DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) – Level 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) – Level 1 February 2010 DURHAM COUNTY (LEVEL 1) Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) – Level 1 Report Number: P9514100112-A02 Distribution: Durham County Council Environment Agency Northumbrian Water Durham County SFRA (Level 1) Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 BACKGROUND TO THE SFRA ................................................................................................................................1 3.0 THE POLICY FRAMEWORK .....................................................................................................................................2 4.0 DATA INFORMING THE SFRA ................................................................................................................................. 4 4.1 Historical Flooding .........................................................................................................................................4 4.2 Areas at Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea.......................................................................................5 4.2.1 Flood Zone Maps ....................................................................................................................................5 4.2.2 Flood Defences .......................................................................................................................................6 4.2.3 Flood Warning Areas ...............................................................................................................................6 4.3 Topography ...................................................................................................................................................6 4.4 Geology .........................................................................................................................................................6 4.5 Previous Flooding Related Investigations .....................................................................................................7 5.0 THE RISK OF FLOODING IN DURHAM COUNTY ...................................................................................................8 5.1 Brief Description of Durham County ..............................................................................................................8 5.2 History of Flooding in Durham County ..........................................................................................................8 5.3 Risk of Flooding from Rivers .........................................................................................................................9 5.4 Risk of Flooding from the Sea .......................................................................................................................9 5.5 Risk of Flooding from Surface Water ............................................................................................................9 5.6 Risk of Flooding from Groundwater .............................................................................................................10 5.7 Risk of Flooding from Reservoirs ................................................................................................................10 5.8 Risk to Life due to Flooding (Flood Hazard) ................................................................................................11 5.9 Climate Change ..........................................................................................................................................12 5.9.1 Impact of Climate Change upon Fluvial (River) Flooding ......................................................................14 5.9.2 Impact of Climate Change upon Tidal Flooding .....................................................................................14 5.9.3 Impact of Climate Change upon Surface Water Flooding ......................................................................14 6.0 PLANNING FOR FLOOD RISK IN DURHAM COUNTY ..........................................................................................16 6.1 Responsibility for Flood Risk Management ................................................................................................. 16 6.2 Spatial Planning ..........................................................................................................................................17 6.2.1 PPS25 Flood Zones ..............................................................................................................................17 6.2.2 The Sequential Test ..............................................................................................................................19 February 2010 Report No. P9514100112-A02 i Durham County SFRA (Level 1) 6.2.3 The Exception Test................................................................................................................................20 6.3 Development management .........................................................................................................................21 6.3.1 Adopting a Sequential Approach ...........................................................................................................21 6.3.2 Applying the Exception Test ..................................................................................................................22 6.3.3 Flood Risk Assessment .........................................................................................................................22 6.3.4 Mitigating the Risk of Flooding through Design .....................................................................................22 6.4 Emergency Planning ...................................................................................................................................24 7.0 MITIGATING THE RISK OF FLOODING THROUGH DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................25 7.1 The Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) .............................................................................................................25 7.2 Data Sources for Developers ......................................................................................................................27 7.3 Site Selection & Site Layout (A Sequential Approach) ................................................................................27 7.4 Building Design ...........................................................................................................................................28 7.5 Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) ......................................................................................................30 7.5.1 Overview ...............................................................................................................................................30 7.5.2 SUDS Maintenance ...............................................................................................................................31 7.5.3 SUDS Approaches ................................................................................................................................32 7.5.4 The Application of SUDS in County Durham .........................................................................................33 7.6 Safe Site Access .........................................................................................................................................34 7.7 Flood Warning, Planning and Preparation ..................................................................................................35 7.7.1 Flood Warning .......................................................................................................................................35 7.7.2 Evacuation Plan (Developers & Site Operators) ....................................................................................35 7.7.3 Flood Plan (Residents & Businesses) ...................................................................................................35 8.0 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................................................36 9.0 A LIVING DOCUMENT ............................................................................................................................................36 February 2010 Report No. P9514100112-A02 ii Durham County SFRA (Level 1) FIGURES Figure 1 Locality Plan Figure 2 Policy Framework (Flood Risk Management) Figure 3 Hierarchy of Flood Risk Management Figure 4 Flood Warning Areas Figure 5 Topography Figure 6 Geology Figure 7 Flood Defences & Flood Hazard Figure 8 Reservoirs Figure 9 Permissible Land Uses Figure 10 Levels of Detail for a Site Based Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) Figure 11 Recommended Building Design Approach (vs Flood Depth) Figure 12 Hierarchy of SUDS Techniques Figure 13 DG5 Register Summary (Northumbrian Water) APPENDICES Appendix A Historical Flooding Incidents Appendix B SFRA Flood Maps (PPS25) Appendix C The Policy Framework Appendix D Previous Investigations Appendix E Data Received to Inform Durham County SFRA Appendix F Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification (Land Uses) Appendix G Methodology for delineating Zone 3b Functional Floodplain Appendix H The ‘Simple’ Method (FD2320) – Flood Defence Failure Appendix I Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) - A Guide for Developers Appendix J Impact of Climate Change (Zone 3a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tyne Estuary Partnership Report FINAL3
    Tyne Estuary Partnership Feasibility Study Date GWK, Hull and EA logos CONTENTS CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 2 PART 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 6 Structure of the Report ...................................................................................................... 6 Background ....................................................................................................................... 7 Vision .............................................................................................................................. 11 Aims and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 11 The Partnership ............................................................................................................... 13 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 14 PART 2: STRATEGIC CONTEXT ....................................................................................... 18 Understanding the River .................................................................................................. 18 Landscape Character ...................................................................................................... 19 Landscape History ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Notes and Local Details for 1:Loooo Sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE Newcastle Upon Tyne and Gateshead
    Natural Environment Research Council INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES Geological Survey of England and Wales Geological notes and local details for 1:lOOOO sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead Part of 1:50000 sheets 14 (Morpeth), 15 (Tynemouth), 20 (Newcastle upon Tyne) and 21 (Sunderland) G. Richardson with contributions by D. A. C. Mills Bibliogrcphic reference Richardson, G. 1983. Geological notes and local details for 1 : 10000 sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE (Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead) (Keyworth: Institute of Geological Sciences .) Author G. Richardson Institute of Geological Sciences W indsorTerrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HE Production of this report was supported by theDepartment ofthe Environment The views expressed in this reportare not necessarily those of theDepartment of theEnvironment - 0 Crown copyright 1983 KEYWORTHINSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICALSCIENCES 1983 PREFACE "his account describes the geology of l:25 000 sheet NZ 26 which spans the adjoining corners of l:5O 000 geological sheets 14 (Morpeth), 15 (Tynemouth), 20 (Newcastle upon Tyne) and sheet 22 (Sunderland). The area was first surveyed at a scale of six inches to one mile by H H Howell and W To~ley. Themaps were published in the old 'county' series during the years 1867 to 1871. During the first quarter of this century parts of the area were revised but no maps were published. In the early nineteen twenties part of the southern area was revised by rcJ Anderson and published in 1927 on the six-inch 'County' edition of Durham 6 NE. In the mid nineteen thirties G Burnett revised a small part of the north of the area and this revision was published in 1953 on Northumberland New 'County' six-inch maps 85 SW and 85 SE.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Club Experience - Cheap Weekend Walking Breaks Enjoy the High Pennines, Hadrian’S Wall & Durham on Our Annual Short Summer Break
    “Outdoor activities for all” 2010 Club Experience - Cheap Weekend Walking Breaks Enjoy the High Pennines, Hadrian’s Wall & Durham on our annual Short Summer Break Thursday 1st to Monday 5th July 2010 John Hillaby’s Journey through Britain: “No botanical name-dropping, can give an adequate impression of the botanical jewels sprinkled on the ground above High Force. In this valley, a tundra has been marvellously preserved; the glint of colour, the reds, deep purples, and blues have the quality of Chartres glass.” High Force Booking Information & Form High England – Hadrian’s Wall and The North Pennines, a designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, for much of its history a wild and dangerous frontier zone until the union of the crowns in 1603 largely ended centuries of war with Scotland. Today, it is sadly an area often overlooked by walkers as we head further north to the mountains of Scotland or to the Lake District. On our Club Experience summer short breaks we seek remoteness, the lure of hills, trails and paths to suit all abilities, places of culture and history and a destination that can enable us to escape for a short while from the stress of work and enjoy the social fun and community we all crave. Blackton Grange www.blacktongrangefarmhouse.com I promise will surprise - surrounded by rolling uplands, quiet lanes, dry stone walls and scenic reservoirs it is the perfect destination to escape the hustle and bustle and enjoy a relaxing break, with the comforts of home in a spectacular setting. This great venue can sleep up to 45 persons, but for our club experience long weekend the maximum number accommodated will be 28 persons, giving us a minimum of 6 double/twin rooms available and no more than four persons will share the other spacious bedrooms (these shared rooms will be allocated on a single sex basis unless booked by couples or friends who may wish to share).
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 Project Pipeline
    3.0 Project Pipeline Following the workshop the project proposals were summarised into a pipeline. This was shared with all attendees for comments and further input and then reviewed by the North East LNP Natural Environment Group and other LNP representatives. The following summary provides an overview of project potential and likelihood of development. It is clear from this that there are potential landscape projects in the pipeline until 2019. Beyond this there is significant potential for further delivery, however the majority of these projects are currently at an outline stage and would require significant work to move towards delivery. This pipeline will be reviewed annually by the 3 North East LNPs to ensure that it remains a current overview of landscape delivery potential and allow partners to focus and align resources to ensure that there is the best approach taken to achieve delivery. It is anticipated that during this process, some projects will be discounted from the pipeline as delivery is unachievable whilst new ideas may be added as new opportunities are presented. Title Living Wild at Kielder Forest Source Existing project Lead Organisation Kielder Water and Forest Park Development Trust Estimated Size Geography Kielder Forest Project description Help people experience and learn about the area’s special animals and plants through the development of ‘nature hubs’ and a year-round events and activity programme. Partners Kielder Water and Forest Park Development Trust, Northumbrian Water, Forestry Commission , Northumberland Wildlife Trust, Environment Agency, Northumberland National Park Authority and Newcastle University. Timescale 2016- Estimated project £350,000 cost Funding sources HLF Identified need Outcomes Wildlife trails will be created from Stonehaugh, Falstone and Greenhaugh villages with support from the local community, while wildlife ambassadors and volunteers will inspire and engage with visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Pennines
    LANDSCAPE CHARACTER THE NORTH PENNINES The North Pennines The North Pennines The North Pennines Countryside Character Area County Boundary Key characteristics • An upland landscape of high moorland ridges and plateaux divided by broad pastoral dales. • Alternating strata of Carboniferous limestones, sandstones and shales give the topography a stepped, horizontal grain. • Millstone Grits cap the higher fells and form distinctive flat-topped summits. Hard igneous dolerites of the Great Whin Sill form dramatic outcrops and waterfalls. • Broad ridges of heather moorland and acidic grassland and higher summits and plateaux of blanket bog are grazed by hardy upland sheep. • Pastures and hay meadows in the dales are bounded by dry stone walls, which give way to hedgerows in the lower dale. • Tree cover is sparse in the upper and middle dale. Hedgerow and field trees and tree-lined watercourses are common in the lower dale. • Woodland cover is low. Upland ash and oak-birch woods are found in river gorges and dale side gills, and larger conifer plantations in the moorland fringes. • The settled dales contain small villages and scattered farms. Buildings have a strong vernacular character and are built of local stone with roofs of stone flag or slate. • The landscape is scarred in places by mineral workings with many active and abandoned limestone and whinstone quarries and the relics of widespread lead workings. • An open landscape, broad in scale, with panoramic views from higher ground to distant ridges and summits. • The landscape of the moors is remote, natural and elemental with few man made features and a near wilderness quality in places.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Visual Impact Appriasal Proposed Western Relief Road
    LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT APPRIASAL PROPOSED WESTERN RELIEF ROAD Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope and purpose of the appraisal 1.2 Methodology 2. Landscape and visual baseline 2.1 Landscape character 2.1.1 National Character Areas / County Character Areas 2.1.2 Broad Landscape Types and Character Areas 2.1.3 Local Character Areas 2.1.4 Local Landscape Types and subtypes 2.2 Landscape features 2.2.1 Landform 2.2.2 Woodlands and scrub 2.2.3 Field boundaries and field trees 2.2.4 Wetlands and watercourses 2.2.5 Other features 2.3 Landscape value 2.3.1 National Designations 2.3.2 Local designations 2.3.3 Other designations 2.3.4 Local landscape strategies 2.3.5 Tree Preservation Orders 2.3.6 Values and attributes 3. Visual baseline • Visibility • Visual receptors • Viewpoints and views 4 Potential landscape effects 4.1 Landscape features 4.1.1 Landform 4.1.2 Woodlands and scrub 4.1.3 Field boundaries and field trees 4.1.4 Wetlands and watercourses 4.1.5 Other features 4.2 Landscape character 4.2.1 National Character Areas / County Character Areas 4.2.2 Broad Landscape Types and Character Areas 4.2.3 Local Character Areas 4.3 Designated Landscapes 4.3.1 Area of High Landscape Value 4.3.2 Parks and Gardens of Local Interest 4.3.3 Green Belt 5 Potential visual effects 5.1 Residents 5.2 Walkers, cyclists and horse riders 5.4 Motorists 6. Mitigation 7. Conclusions Appendices Appendix 1: Methodology Appendix 2: Figures Figure 1: National Character Areas and County Character Areas Figure 2: Broad Landscape Types and Character Areas Figure 3: Local
    [Show full text]
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009
    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast England – a History of Flash Flooding
    Northeast England – A history of flash flooding Introduction The main outcome of this review is a description of the extent of flooding during the major flash floods that have occurred over the period from the mid seventeenth century mainly from intense rainfall (many major storms with high totals but prolonged rainfall or thaw of melting snow have been omitted). This is presented as a flood chronicle with a summary description of each event. Sources of Information Descriptive information is contained in newspaper reports, diaries and further back in time, from Quarter Sessions bridge accounts and ecclesiastical records. The initial source for this study has been from Land of Singing Waters –Rivers and Great floods of Northumbria by the author of this chronology. This is supplemented by material from a card index set up during the research for Land of Singing Waters but which was not used in the book. The information in this book has in turn been taken from a variety of sources including newspaper accounts. A further search through newspaper records has been carried out using the British Newspaper Archive. This is a searchable archive with respect to key words where all occurrences of these words can be viewed. The search can be restricted by newspaper, by county, by region or for the whole of the UK. The search can also be restricted by decade, year and month. The full newspaper archive for northeast England has been searched year by year for occurrences of the words ‘flood’ and ‘thunder’. It was considered that occurrences of these words would identify any floods which might result from heavy rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-Response.Pdf
    MOVING THE NORTH EAST FORWARD Blueline COVID19 Response Plan BUILDING A SAFER TRANSPORT NETWORK A targeted extension to our normal business planning. 3 Stage Plan. Government Transport Guidelines. PUBLIC TRANSPORT CAPACITY REDUCED BY 90% BY GOVERNMENT Chester-le-Street Billingham Bearpark Ouston Wolsingham Whickham Trimdon Sherburn Hill Redcar High Shincliffe Belford Amble Bournmoor Chopwell Byers Green Ferryhill East Rainton Newcastle Wallsend Tynemouth Blyth Jesmond Consett Stanley Washington Hartlepool North Shields Cramlington Ponteland Whitley Bay Walker Passionately believing in Moving the North East Safely, our Wideopenreconfigured Chester-le-Streettaxi service provides those in need ofBillingham Bearparktransportation the uniqueOuston opportunity for privateWolsingham passenger Whickhamtransport without Trimdon the risks associated Sherburn with queuin gHill, Redcar congregation and excess contact with others – combatting High the risksShincliffe of using public transport. Belford Amble Bournmoor Chopwell Byers Green Ferryhill East Rainton Gateshead Newcastle Wallsend Tynemouth Blyth Jesmond Consett Stanley Washington Hartlepool North Shields Cramlington Ponteland Whitley Bay Walker Our safe Transport Measures. = 24/7 D R D R PRIVATE HIRE SERVICE CONTROLLLED PASSENGER NUMBERS PROTECTIVE CABIN SEPARATION SCREENS DRIVER & PASSENGER SAFETY #StopTheSpread DEEP CLEANSING VEHICLE TREATMENT ACROSS OUR FLEET BOTTLES OF HAND SANITISER VEHICLES CLEANED & DISINFECTED BEFORE & AFTER EVERY SHIFT PAYMENTS TO PREVENT TRANSMISSION FULLY UNIFORMED DRIVERS FRESHLY LAUNDERED IN 60 DEGREE WASH FOR EACH SHIFT £25,000 WORTH OF TAXIS TO KEY WORKERS ACROSS THE REGION DELIVERING GROCERIES TAKEAWAY MEALS MEDICINE & MORE CONTINUED FINANCIAL SUPPORT MEASURES FOR OUR DRIVERS DRIVERS WEAR PPE EQUIPMENT MASKS & GLOVES WHEN NECESSARY MOVING THE NORTH EAST SAFELY #FromOurFamilyToYours #StaySafe .
    [Show full text]
  • Hamsterley Forest 1 Weardalefc Picture Visitor Library Network / John Mcfarlane Welcome to Weardale
    Welcome to Weardale Things to do and places to go in Weardale and the surrounding area. Please leave this browser complete for other visitors. Image : Hamsterley Forest www.discoverweardale.com 1 WeardaleFC Picture Visitor Library Network / John McFarlane Welcome to Weardale This bedroom browser has been compiled by the Weardale Visitor Network. We hope that you will enjoy your stay in Weardale and return very soon. The information contained within this browser is intended as a guide only and while every care has been taken to ensure its accuracy readers will understand that details are subject to change. Telephone numbers, for checking details, are provided where appropriate. Acknowledgements: Design: David Heatherington Image: Stanhope Common courtesy of Visit England/Visit County Durham www.discoverweardale.com 2 Weardale Visitor Network To Hexham Derwent Reservoir To Newcastle and Allendale Carlisle A69 B6295 Abbey Consett River Blanchland West Muggleswick A 692 Allen Edmundbyers Hunstanworth A 691 River Castleside East Allen North Pennines Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Lanchester A 68 B6278 C2C C2C Allenheads B6296 Heritage C2C Centre Hall Hill B6301 Nenthead Farm C2C Rookhope A 689 Lanehead To Alston Tunstall Penrith Cowshill Reservoir M6 Killhope Lead Mining The Durham Dales Centre Museum Wearhead Stanhope Eastgate 3 Ireshopeburn Westgate Tow Law Burnhope B6297 Reservoir Wolsingham B6299 Weardale C2C Frosterley N Museum & St John’s Chapel Farm High House Trail Chapel Weardale Railway Crook A 689 Weardale A 690 Ski Club Weardale
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Outline Water Cycle Study
    Water Durham County Council March 2012 County Durham Outline Water Cycle Study Final Report Water Durham County Council March 2012 Prepared by: Christian Lomax Checked by: Alex Perryman Associate Director Consultant Approved by: Roy Lobley Associate Director County Durham Outline Water Cycle Study Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 0 Draft for comment CL VH Feb 2011 1 Update based on new data AP RL Feb 2012 2 Final Report incorporating feedback AP RL March 2012 5th Floor, 2 City Walk, Leeds, LS11 9AR Telephone: 0113 391 6800 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No: 60155102.M012 Reference: Outline WCS Date Created: March 2012 This document is confidential and the copyright of AECOM Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. f:\projects\water resources - durham swmpwcs\04_reports\wcs\wcs outline report\durham wcs outline report final.doc Table of Contents Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the River Wear-Part 1
    Armchair Adventurers Explore The River Wear G eog rap Part 1 from the Pennines to the outskirts of Durham hy A period. On the sea bed a limy ooze full of the rch y aeo eolog log G decaying skeletons of sea creatures built up. y Rivers washed down sand and gravel building His up deltas, and forests flourished on the deltas tory and swampy margins. Periodically the seas rose, drowned the deltas and forests and more Geology ooze was deposited; then sea levels dropped The River Wear rises in the North Pennines and and the deltas and forests returned. This cycle flows in an easterly direction to empty in the with compression gave rise to sedimentary North Sea at Sunderland. Weardale is in an rocks. The oozes became limestone, the sands, gravels and muds became shale and sandstone, and the forests became coal. Limestone and sandstone are resistant to erosion, whereas the softer shales wear away more easily. This contrast has produced the terraced hillsides which are characteristic of the whole area and the hard limestone outcrops form waterfalls created by the erosion. area designated for it’s Outstanding Natural Beauty. It is also a UNESCO Global Geopark. A Geopark is a place of outstanding geological heritage which is used to support sustainable development through conservation, education, interpretation and nature tourism. High Force Waterfall Limestone is the dominant rock in Upper The landscape has evolved over 500 million Weardale. Its main constituent, calcium years. During that time the valley has been carbonate, is soluble in rainwater which is liquid molten rock, desert,tropical sea,swamps, acidic and has eroded it to form sink holes, and an ice sheet.
    [Show full text]