DOCSLIB.ORG

Online Library of Liberty: the Chief Works of Benedict De Spinoza, Vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico- Politicus, Tractatus Politicus)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Online Library of Liberty: the Chief Works of Benedict De Spinoza, Vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico- Politicus, Tractatus Politicus) The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Benedict de Spinoza, The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico-Politicus, Tractatus Politicus) [1670] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected]. LIBERTY FUND, INC. 8335 Allison Pointe Trail, Suite 300 Indianapolis, Indiana 46250-1684 Online Library of Liberty: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico- Politicus, Tractatus Politicus) Edition Used: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, translated from the Latin, with an Introduction by R.H.M. Elwes, vol. 1 Introduction, Tractatus-Theologico-Politicus, Tractatus Politicus. Revised edition (London: George Bell and Sons, 1891). Author: Benedict de Spinoza Translator: Robert Harvey Monro Elwes About This Title: This volume contains 2 of Spinoza’s most important political works, the Theologico- Political Treatise and the posthumous Political Treatise. PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 2 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1710 Online Library of Liberty: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico- Politicus, Tractatus Politicus) About Liberty Fund: Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. Copyright Information: The text is in the public domain. Fair Use Statement: This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit. PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 3 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1710 Online Library of Liberty: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico- Politicus, Tractatus Politicus) Table Of Contents Introduction. Preface. A Theologico-political Treatise. Chapter I.: Of Prophecy. Chapter II.: Of Prophets. Chapter III.: Of the Vocation of the Hebrews, and Whether the Gift of Prophecy Was Peculiar to Them. Chapter IV.: Of the Divine Law. Chapter V.: Of the Ceremonial Law. Chapter VI.: Of Miracles. Chapter VII.: Of the Interpretation of Scripture. Chapter VIII.: Of the Authorship of the Pentateuch and the Other Historical Books of the Old Testament. Chapter IX.: Other Questions Concerning the Same Books: Namely, Whether They Were Completely Finished By Ezra, And, Further, Whether the Marginal Notes Which Are Found In the Hebrew Texts Were Various Readings. Chapter X.: An Examination of the Remaining Books of the Old Testament According to the Preceding Method. Chapter XI.: An Inquiry Whether the Apostles Wrote Their Epistles As Apostles and Prophets, Or Merely As Teachers; and an Explanation of What Is Meant By an Apostle. Chapter XII.: Of the True Original of the Divine Law, and Wherefore Scripture Is Called Sacred, and the Word of God. How That, In So Far As It Contains the Word of God, It Has Come Down to Us Uncorrupted. Chapter XIII.: It Is Shown That Scripture Teaches Only Very Simple Doctrines, Such As Suffice For Right Conduct. Chapter XIV.: Definitions of Faith, the Faith, and the Foundations of Faith, Which Is Once For All Separated From Philosophy. Chapter XV.: Theology Is Shown Not to Be Subservient to Reason, Nor Reason to Theology: a Definition of the Reason Which Enables Us to Accept the Authority of the Bible. Chapter XVI.: Of the Foundations of a State; of the Natural and Civil Rights of Individuals; and of the Rights of the Sovereign Power. Chapter XVII.: It Is Shown That No One Can, Or Need, Transfer All His Rights to the Sovereign Power. of the Hebrew Republic, As It Was During the Lifetime of Moses, and After His Death, Till the Foundation of the Monarchy; and of Its Excellence. Lastly, O Chapter XVIII.: From the Commonwealth of the Hebrews, and Their History, Certain Political Doctrines Are Deduced. Chapter XIX.: It Is Shown That the Right Over Matters Spiritual Lies Wholly With the Sovereign, and That the Outward Forms of Religion Should Be In Accordance With Public Peace, If We Would Obey God Aright. PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 4 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1710 Online Library of Liberty: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico- Politicus, Tractatus Politicus) Chapter XX.: That In a Free State Every Man May Think What He Likes, and Say What He Thinks. From the Editor’s Preface to the Posthumous Works of Benedict De Spinoza. A Political Treatise. Chapter I.: Introduction. Chapter II.: Of Natural Right. Chapter III.: Of the Right of Supreme Authorities. Chapter IV.: Of the Functions of Supreme Authorities. Chapter V.: Of the Best State of a Dominion. Chapter VI.: Of Monarchy. Chapter VII.: Of Monarchy (continuation). Chapter VIII.: Of Aristocracy. Chapter IX.: Of Aristocracy. Continuation. Chapter X.: Of Aristocracy. Conclusion. Chapter XI.: Of Democracy. PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 5 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1710 Online Library of Liberty: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico- Politicus, Tractatus Politicus) [Back to Table of Contents] INTRODUCTION. “Konstatiert ist es, das der Lebenswandel des Spinoza frei von allem Tadel war, und rein und makellos wie das Leben seines göttlichen Vetters, Jesu Christi. Auch wie Dieser litt er für seine Lehre wie Dieser trug er die Dornenkrone. Ueberall, wo ein grosser Geist seine Gedenken ausspricht, ist Golgotha.” —Heine. A VERY few years ago the writings of Spinoza were almost unknown in this country. The only authorities to which the English reader could be referred were the brilliant essays of Mr. Froude1 and Mr. Matthew Arnold,2 the graphic but somewhat misleading sketch in Lewes’s “History of Philosophy,” and the unsatisfactory volume of Dr. R. Willis.3 But in 1880 Mr. Pollock brought out his most valuable “Spinoza, his Life and Philosophy,”4 likely long to remain the standard work on the subject; Dr. Martineau has followed with a sympathetic and gracefully written “Study of Spinoza;” Professor Knight has edited a volume of Spinozistic Essays by Continental Philosophers; Auerbach’s biographical novel1 has been translated, and many writers have made contributions to the subject in magazines and reviews. At first sight this stir of tardy recognition may seem less surprising than the preceding apathy, for history can show few figures more remarkable than the solitary thinker of Amsterdam. But the causes which kept Spinoza in comparative obscurity are not very far to seek. Personally he shrank with almost womanly sensitiveness from anything like notoriety: his chief work was withheld till after his death, and then published anonymously; his treatise on Religion was also put forth in secret, and he disclaims with evident sincerity all desire to found a school, or give his name to a sect. Again, the form in which his principal work is cast is such as to repel those dilettante readers, whose suffrage is necessary for a widely-extended reputation; none but genuine students would care to grapple with the serried array of definitions, axioms, and propositions, of which the Ethics is composed, while the display of geometric accuracy flatters the careless into supposing, that the whole structure is interdependent, and that, when a single breach has been effected, the entire fabric has been demolished. The matter, no less than the manner, of Spinoza’s writings was such as to preclude popularity. He genuinely shocked his contemporaries. Advances in thought are tolerated in proportion as they respond to and, as it were, kindle into flame ideas which are already smouldering obscurely in many minds. A teacher may deepen, modify, transfigure what he finds, but he must not attempt radical reconstruction. In the seventeenth century all men’s deepest convictions were inseparably bound up with anthropomorphic notions of the Deity; Spinoza, in attacking these latter and endeavouring to substitute the conception of eternal and necessary law, seemed to be striking at the very roots of moral order: hence with curious irony his works, which few read and still fewer understood, became associated with notions of monstrous PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 6 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1710 Online Library of Liberty: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol 1 (Tractatus-Theologico- Politicus, Tractatus Politicus) impiety, and their author, who loved virtue with single-hearted and saintly devotion, was branded as a railer against God and a subverter of morality, whom it was a shame even to speak of.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spinoza's Political Theory: Naturalism, Determinism And
    Open Journal of Philosophy, 2017, 7, 105-115 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp ISSN Online: 2163-9442 ISSN Print: 2163-9434 Spinoza’s Political Theory: Naturalism, Determinism and Institutionalism Jan-Erik Lane Public Policy Institute, Belgrade, Serbia How to cite this paper: Lane, J.-E. (2017). Abstract Spinoza’s Political Theory: Naturalism, De- terminism and Institutionalism. Open Jour- Spinoza has a formidable reputation as an abstract philosopher in the ratio- nal of Philosophy, 7, 105-115. nalist school of the 17th century. This standard image of him stems from his https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2017.72007 elegant Ethics, examining men and women with the Euclidean method of Received: March 25, 2017 axioms, corollaries and implications. He launched a fascinating theory about Accepted: May 24, 2017 moral naturalism and ethical determinism, much debated by other great phi- Published: May 27, 2017 losophers. However, he also has two political texts, one on religion and Copyright © 2017 by author and another on political regime. They are much more reader friendly and the ar- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. guments are simple, following from the foundations in Ethics. At least, Spi- This work is licensed under the Creative noza so believed. This paper presents systematically the political theory in Commons Attribution International Tractatus Politicus, which has received too little attention. License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access Keywords Naturalism, Determinism, Hobbes, Kierkegaard, Monarchy, Aristocracy and Democracy, Institutionalism and Choice 1. Introduction Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677) dealt with general philosophy, the philosophy of re- ligion and political philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Confucian Defense of Shame: Morality, Self-Cultivation, and the Dangers of Shamelessness
    religions Article Article Article A ConfucianA Confucian Defense Defense of Shame: of Shame: Morality, Morality, Self-Cultivation, Self-Cultivation, A Confucian Defense of Shame: Morality, Self-Cultivation, and theand Dangers the Dangers of Shamelessness of Shamelessness and the Dangers of Shamelessness Mark BerksonMark Berkson Mark Berkson Department of Religion,Department Hamline of Religion, University, Hamline St. Paul, University, MN 55104, St. USA;Paul, [email protected] 55104, USA; [email protected] Department of Religion, Hamline University, St. Paul, MN 55104, USA; [email protected] Abstract: ManyAbstract: philosophers Many and philosophers scholars in and the scholars West have in the a negative West have view a negative of shame. view In muchof shame. In much of Abstract: Many philosophers and scholars in the West have a negative view of shame.of post-classical In much ofpost-classical Western ethical Western thought, ethical shame thought, is compared shame is negativelycompared negatively with guilt, with as shame guilt, isas shame is asso- post-classical Western ethical thought, shame is compared negatively with guilt, asassociated shame is asso- withciated the “outer”, with the how “outer”, one appears how one before appears others before (and othe thusrs is (and merely thus a is matter merely of a “face”), matter of “face”), and ciated with the “outer”, how one appears before others (and thus is merely a matterand of “face”), guilt is and associatedguilt is associated with the “inner”with the realm “inner” of therealm conscience of the conscience and soul. and Anthropologists soul. Anthropologists and and philoso- guilt is associated with the “inner” realm of the conscience and soul.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of the Development of Augustine's Doctrine of Grace By
    In Defense of the Development of Augustine’s Doctrine of Grace by Laban Omondi Agisa Submitted to the faculty of the School of Theology of the University of the South in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Sacred Theology January 2020 Sewanee, Tennessee Approved ____________________________ _______________ Adviser Date ____________________________ _______________ Second Adviser Date 2 DECLARATION I declare that this is my original work and has not been presented in any other institution for consideration of any certification. This work has been complemented by sources duly acknowledged and cited using Chicago Manual Style. Signature Date 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My study of theology was initiated in 2009 by the then Provost of St. Stephens Cathedral, Nairobi, the late Ven. Canon John Ndung’u who was a great encouragement to me. This was further made possible through my bishop the Rt. Rev. Joel Waweru and the Rev. Geoffrey Okapisi who were sources of inspiration. My studies at Carlile College (Church Army Africa) and St. Paul’s University laid a strong theological foundation and I appreciate among others the influence of the Rev. Dr. John Kiboi who introduced me to Philosophy, Systematic Theology, Ethics, and African Christian Theology that eventually became the foundation for my studies at the University of the South. I also appreciate the encouragement of my lecturers Mrs. Tabitha Waweru and Dr. Scholarstica Githinji during my Study of Education at Kenya Technical Trainers College and at Daystar University respectively. My interest in this topic came as a result of many sittings with two professors at the University of the South, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinoza on the Body Politic
    _full_journalsubtitle: A Journal for the Study of Science, Technology and Medicine in the Pre-modern Period _full_abbrevjournaltitle: ESM _full_ppubnumber: ISSN 1383-7427 (print version) _full_epubnumber: ISSN 1573-3823 (online version) _full_issue: 1 _full_issuetitle: The Body Politic from Medieval Lombardy to the Dutch Republic _full_alt_author_running_head (neem stramien J2 voor dit article en vul alleen 0 in hierna): 0 _full_alt_articletitle_running_head (rechter kopregel - mag alles zijn): From the King’s Two Bodies to the People’s Two Bodies _full_is_advance_article: 0 _full_article_language: en indien anders: engelse articletitle: 0 46 Early Science and Medicine 25 (2020) 46-72 Terpstra www.brill.com/esm From the King’s Two Bodies to the People’s Two Bodies: Spinoza on the Body Politic Marin Terpstra Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract In this article, using Spinoza’s treatment of the image of the political body, I aim to show what happens to the concept of a healthy commonwealth linked to a monarchist model of political order when transformed into a new context: the emergence of a democratic political order. The traditional representation of the body politic becomes problematic when people, understood as individual natural bodies, are taken as the starting point in political theory. Spinoza’s understanding of the composite body, and the assumption that each body is composed, raises the question of the stability or instability of this composition. This has implications for the way one looks
    [Show full text]
  • The Curious Case of Baruch Spinoza in Walter Ben­Ja­Min’S “Toward the Critique of Violence”
    The Curious Case of Baruch Spinoza in Walter Ben ja min’s “Toward the Critique of Violence” MASSIMO PALMA abstract Although Baruch Spinoza was im por tant for think ers of his gen er a tion, Walter Ben ja­ min seems to have com pletely ig nored the phi los o pher. Spinoza’s name ap pears just a few times in Ben ja min’s works, and Spinoza’s thought never seems to have been rel e vant to him. The only place where Ben ja min quotes a text of Spinoza’s, al beit be tween the lines, is in “Toward the Critique of Violence” (1921). Still, in this essay Ben ja min is far from enthu si as tic about the au thor of the Ethics. He names Spinoza as a pro po nent of nat u ral law the o ry, which Ben ja min dismisses in his search for a cri te rion with which to judge Gewalt. This ar ti cle seeks to in ves ti gate Ben ja min’s ap par ent hos til ity to Spinoza and to reexamine the re la tion ship be tween the two, from both a the o ret i cal and a po lit i cal per spec tive. keywords Walter Ben ja min, Baruch Spinoza, le gal vi o lence, nat u ral law, mi gra tion The names of Walter Ben ja min and Baruch Spinoza rarely ap pear along side one an other in the lit er a ture on Ben ja min.
    [Show full text]
  • Endowment Investment Philosophy® White Paper
    Investor Use ENDOWMENT INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY® WHITE PAPER Abstract The purpose of this white paper is to explain why the Endowment Investment Philosophy ® is a better option to manage your wealth. The Endowment Investment Philosophy is rooted in the basic idea that financial markets as defined by 2-dimensional stock and bond portfolios are inherently efficient and to exploit inefficiencies investors have to extend their investment universe to include alternative investments. The Endowment Investment Philosophy seeks to replicate the 3-dimensional asset allocations built by Yale, Harvard, and over 800 other university endowments across the nation. Why? Because these institutions have historically exhibited an ability to beat an equity -only index. By separating their long-term capital appreciation goals from their short -term liquidity needs, University Endowments expand their time horizons to reduce volatility concerns. This allows them to exhibit behavioral characteristics that make them more disciplined and less susceptible to emotional biases, and more heavily weight ed to the highest-expected return asset classes. Prateek Mehrotra, MBA, CFA, CAIA ©Copyright 2013-2020 Endowment Wealth Management, Inc. White Paper: Endowment Investment Philosophy® WHAT IS THE ENDOWMENT INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY? The Endowment Investment Philosophy builds 3-dimensional portfolios using an asset allocation methodology pursued by major universities like Yale and Harvard as it offers the potential for superior risk-adjusted returns and lower volatility across a complete market cycle. This investment philosophy expands the number of asset classes and strategies used to create a 3-D portfolio by including alternative investments such as hedge funds, private equity, and real assets, in addition to traditional stocks and bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2021 PAULA LOUISE GOTTLIEB Department of Philosophy 5185 Helen C
    May 2021 PAULA LOUISE GOTTLIEB Department of Philosophy 5185 Helen C. White Hall 600 North Park Street University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 263 0253 (office) (608) 265 3701 (fax) [email protected] (e-mail) gottlieb.philosophy.wisc.edu (web site) Present Position: Full Professor of Philosophy and Affiliate Professor of Classical and Near Eastern Studies Education: St. Hilda’s College, Oxford University, England 1977-83: B.A. Hons. in Literae Humaniores (Ancient Greek and Latin Literature; Philosophy and Ancient Greek and Roman History) 1981 B.Phil. in Philosophy (Moral and Political Philosophy, Philosophical Logic and Aristotle) 1983 M.A. 1986 Cornell University 1983-88: M.A. in Philosophy 1986 Ph.D. in Philosophy 1988 Areas of Specialization: Ancient Greek Philosophy; Ethics B.Phil. Thesis: “Some Problems of Akrasia in Aristotle and Modern Writers” Main Supervisor: M. J. Woods; also Susan Hurley Doctoral Dissertation: “Aristotle and the Measure of All Things” Committee: T. H. Irwin (main supervisor), Gail Fine, David Lyons and Sydney Shoemaker Employment: Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Fall 1988-Spring 1994 Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Summer 1994-Fall 1999 Full Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, from Fall 1999 1 Honors and Awards: Oxford: Open Exhibition, 1977-81 Christina Keith Travel Prize (awarded by the college), 1979 Postgraduate College Scholarship, 1981-83 Cornell: Sage Graduate Fellowship, 1983-84 Martin McVoy Trust Fellowship, 1987-88 Messenger-Chalmers prize for “the doctoral dissertation giving evidence of the best research and most fruitful thought” in the Humanities (University-wide, Cornell University, 1989) Honorable mention in the Guilford Prize for the best-written dissertation (University- wide, Cornell University, 1989) University nomination for a National Endowment for the Humanities summer stipend, 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Bertrand Russell As a Moral Force in World Politics by I
    Bertrand Russell as a moral force in world politics by I. F. Stone THE PHILOSOPHER WE are here to honour tonight has a unique distinction in the history of philosophy. There has never been in the history of the world a philosopher who was as much loved in his time and as world wide as Bertrand Russell. No other philosopher made himself so relevant to the concerns and the anguish ofhis time as Bertrand Russell. True, he did not develop a system, but every system merely takes a flash ofinsight and creates an elaborate fiction out of it. But I am not here to talk about Russell as a philosopher-I am not competent to discuss his achievements in the more recondite and technical fields of philosophy-but to speak of him as a moral influence, for the world has great need ofmen ofthis kind. He and Einstein (and one really has to think of them together) represented what is some­ thing almost new in world history. Ifwe look about for a successor to exercise a moral influence on the rather tangled and immoral activities of mankind, we have to recognize that the human race is very, very primitive. To exercise a moral influence over the human race requires, first of all, that you be associated with some tricks-a little bit of "circus" is required to capture the imagination and win the awe of mankind. Moses had the worst and the best of the Pharoah's sorcerers to prove his mettle, Jesus had to walk on water, and in our more enlightened age, we have much the same phenomenon, although it is in a somewhat more superficially subtle form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essential JOHN STUART MILL the Essential DAVID HUME
    The Essential JOHN STUART MILL The Essential DAVID HUME DAVID The Essential by Sandra J. Peart Copyright © 2021 by the Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. The author of this publication has worked independently and opinions expressed by him are, therefore, his own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Fraser Institute or its supporters, directors, or staff. This publication in no way implies that the Fraser Institute, its directors, or staff are in favour of, or oppose the passage of, any bill; or that they support or oppose any particular political party or candidate. Printed and bound in Canada Cover design and artwork Bill C. Ray ISBN 978-0-88975-616-8 Contents Introduction: Who Was John Stuart Mill? / 1 1. Liberty: Why, for Whom, and How Much? / 9 2. Freedom of Expression: Learning, Bias, and Tolerance / 21 3. Utilitarianism: Happiness, Pleasure, and Public Policy / 31 4. Mill’s Feminism: Marriage, Property, and the Labour Market / 41 5. Production and Distribution / 49 6. Mill on Property / 59 7. Mill on Socialism, Capitalism, and Competition / 71 8. Mill’s Considerations on Representative Government / 81 Concluding Thoughts: Lessons from Mill’s Radical Reformism / 91 Suggestions for Further Reading / 93 Publishing information / 99 About the author / 100 Publisher’s acknowledgments / 100 Supporting the Fraser Institute / 101 Purpose, funding, and independence / 101 About the Fraser Institute / 102 Editorial Advisory Board / 103 Fraser Institute d www.fraserinstitute.org Introduction: Who Was John Stuart Mill? I have thought that in an age in which education, and its improvement, are the subject of more, if not of profounder study than at any former period of English history, it may be useful that there should be some record of an education which was unusual and remarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Enacting Knowledge: Spinoza's Dynamic of Politics
    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Enacting knowledge: Spinoza’s dynamic of politics https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40421/ Version: Full Version Citation: Marston, Stephanie (2019) Enacting knowledge: Spinoza’s dy- namic of politics. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Enacting Knowledge: Spinoza’s Dynamic of Politics Stephanie Marston Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Birkbeck College, University of London 2019 1 Abstract The central claims of my thesis are that Spinoza’s philosophy of mind and affect entails that human knowledge is distinctively creative; and that understanding this makes it possible to understand Spinoza’s political philosophy as grounded in the interplay between knowing and the effects of knowledge. I develop the arguments underpinning these claims to show that the tensions commonly perceived in Spinoza’s political philosophy are a manifestation of its dynamism and creativity. The first part of my thesis proposes that, within Spinoza’s metaphysics, individual modes should be understood as distinguished by their effects on other modes, rather than by essence. I proceed from this interpretive premise to an explication of Spinoza’s theory of knowledge: situating it within the philosophy of mind adumbrated in Part 2 of the Ethics, I develop a reading of Spinoza’s epistemology as a theory of ‘affective knowing’. I argue that his account of knowledge formation implies a necessary interdependence among the three kinds of knowledge discussed in E2p40s2, with all knowledge shaped by both the knower’s encounters with other modes and her own acting.
    [Show full text]
  • Katharina T. Kraus CURRICULUM VITAE
    Katharina T. Kraus CURRICULUM VITAE PERSONAL INFORMATION Department of Philosophy Email: [email protected] University of Notre Dame Office: 309 Malloy Hall 100 Malloy Hall Phone: +1 (574) 631 - 7327 Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA RESEARCH AREAS Areas of Specialisation Kant, Philosophy of Mind, Philosophy of Psychology Areas of Competence Modern Philosophy (esp. 17th and 18th Century), Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Language, Moral Psychology ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2017 – present Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame (USA) Steering Committee and Fellow of the History of Philosophy Forum Faculty Fellow of the Nanovic Institute for European Studies Faculty Member of the Ph.D. Program in History and Philosophy of Science 2014 – 2016 Assistant Professor, Epistemology and Theory of Science, University College Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs University of Freiburg (Germany) 2013 – 2014 Postdoctoral Fellow of the Martin Buber Society of Fellows in the Humanities, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Israel) EDUCATION PHILOSOPHY 2013 Ph.D. History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge (UK) Thesis Title: “Psychological knowledge in Kant’s Critical thinking” 2010 MPhil History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge (UK) Thesis Title: “Kant’s Theory of Agency” 2009 Philosophy (Bachelor equivalent: “Grundstudium” of Magister Artium) Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg (Germany) PHYSICS 2008 Diplom Physics (Bachelor & Master equivalent; Minors: Mathematics, Philosophy) Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg (Germany) PUBLICATIONS MONOGRAPHS 1. Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation: The Nature of Inner Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. EDITED VOLUMES 2 Katharina T. Kraus – CV 2. Kant’s Philosophy of Science. Bridging the Gap between the Natural and the Human Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • NEH Grant Offers and Awards, July 2020 Page 2 of 45
    NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES GRANT AWARDS AND OFFERS, JULY 2020 ALABAMA (5) $840,069 Auburn Auburn University Outright: $175,000 [Institutes for School Teachers] Project Director: Jada Kohlmeier Project Title: Citizens Fighting for Civil Rights: The Places, Faces, and Cases that Changed a Nation Project Description: A two-week institute for 25 school teachers on civil rights and legal history, focusing on four landmark Supreme Court cases from Alabama. Birmingham Alabama Humanities Foundation Outright: $214,955 [Institutes for School Teachers] Project Director: Martha Bouyer Project Title: “Stony the Road We Trod…”: Exploring Alabama’s Civil Rights Legacy Project Description: A three-week institute for 30 school teachers on the history and legacy of the civil rights movement in Alabama. Dothan Wiregrass Museum of Art, Inc Outright: $9,987 [Preservation Assistance Grants] Project Director: Dana-Marie Lemmer Project Title: Preservation Supplies Project Description: The purchase of preservation supplies and environmental monitoring equipment, including storage supplies and equipment for collecting data and monitoring light levels, temperature, and humidity. The Wiregrass Museum of Art, a small contemporary art museum in the Wiregrass region of southeast Alabama, maintains a collection of over 1,100 objects. Mobile Spring Hill College Outright: $185,427 [Landmarks of American History] Project Director: Ryan Noble Project Title: From Clotilda to Community: The History of Mobile, Alabama’s Africatown Project Description: Two one-week
    [Show full text]