RADIO Meteor Astronomy - a REVIE'ií

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RADIO Meteor Astronomy - a REVIE'ií RADTO METEOR ASTRONOMY by G" Gartrel-r, B.Sc. (Hons" ) A thesis presented for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the UNIVERS]TY OF ADELATDE (Physics Departrnent ) May l-971 TO MY'WTFE LESLYE CONTE{TS SUMT{ARY PREFACE CHAPTER T CITAPTER IÏ RADIO METEOR ASTRONOI\4Y - A REVTET\I CHAPTER T]] - RA.DIO REFLECTTON FROM METEOR TRATLS 3.1 Introduction 21 3.2 Trail Formation 2T 3.3 Reflection of Rad.io 'nlaves by Meteor Trails 23 3. 3.1 Phase Angles 2l+ 3.3.2 The Cornu Spiral- 26 3.3.3 The Effect of Wind. and. llind. Shear DO 3. 3.4 Irregular lonization 32 3.3.5 Diffusion 33 CHAPTER IV THE A.DEI,AIDE RADIO METEOR SYSTEM 3)+ )+.r Introduction 3\ \.2 Equipnent 3' \.2.t Transmitters 35 )+.2.2 Transraitting Aerials 36 )+.2 .3 Main Station Receiving Aerials 3T )+.e.)+ 27 Î,¡ftlz Receivers 38 )+.2 ,5 The Outstations and. Telemetry Links 39 \.2.6 Main Station Reeord.ing Equipment )+3 \.3 Film Record.s )+T \.\ Grour¡d Geometry and. Reflection Point Determination l+8 l+. \. r Location of Outstations 48 )+. \.2 Location of Reflection Points )+9 CHAPTER V DATA REDUCTTON 5rI Fil-rn Read.ing 52 5.2 Deternination of Velocity a¡rd. Position ,6 5.3 Aceuracy of Resrrlts 6o CHAPTER VT ATMOSPHERTC RETARDATTON 6T 6 l_ Introd.uction 67 6 2 Derivation and. Solution of the Drag Equation 6B 6 3 Aecuracy of Results 75 6 4 Measured. Val-ues of Surface Area/Mass Ratio 76 6 5 Caleul-atlon of Unretarded Geocentric Velocity 92 6 6 Sunna^:ry 95 CHAPTER VII - METEOR STREAT4S 97 7.r fntroduction 97 7.2 Assoeiation Tests for Strea.m Meteors 98 7.3 The Significance of Small Groups 10\ 7.\ Association Significance and. Salrple ,Size 108 7.5 A Systenatic Strea¡n Search 109 7.6 Discussion of Particular StreFms a.nd. Some Possible Conetary Assocíations 110 7 .6.t Ihe Geninid ltitreteor Strenm 110 7.6.2 The Virginids ar6 7 .6.3 The Arietid.s 118 7 .6.)1 Hy¡rerbolic Stre¡ms 420 7.6.j The Monocerotid. Strea.m ]t23 7.6.6 The Southern Taurid.s a¡rd. Ç-Perseid.s 1z)1 T .6.7 The Andronedid (siefj.a) Strean L26 7.6.8 Strea¡r Rad.iants Possibly Associated. w"ith Comet Lexell 1770 I Lzg T.T Toroid.aJ- Meteor Stre¡ms 131 7.8 A Conprehensive Southern Hemisphere Search for Cometary Assoeiations with }4eteor gf,¡q¡ms L39 CHAPTER VIII - DISTRTBUTTONS 1\8 8.r Introduction 1\8 8.2 Selection Effects 150 Page No. 8.2.t Astronomi cal Sele ct Íon 150 8.2.2 Atmospheric Interaction Seleetion ]-r2 8.2.3 Fragmentation Lr6. 8.3 Dístribution with Reflection Point Height l,57 8.s.r A Possible Velocity-Ifeight Selection Effect L5T 8.s.2 Und.erd.ense and. Persistent Echoes 158 8. 3.3 H¡ryerbolíc Meteors anci a Check on the Atmospheri c Retard.ation Correction ]-59 8.\ Rad.iant Distributions' rr9 8.5 Velocity Distributions L63 8.6 Orbital Elenent Distributions 166 CHAPTER TX SOME CONCLUSIO}TS FROM THE PRESENT SIIR\TEY Æ\ÏD Æ\Ï E"XPI,AT{ATION OF SOME APPARENÎ ANOMALIES ]N TERMS OF A HTPOTTTETICAL ORIGIN TOR COMETS r82 9.1, Recapitulation r82 9.1.1 Atmospherí c Deceleration ltde asurements 182 9.1.2 Meteor St?eâns ancl Cometary Assoeiations 183 9 .1.3 Orbit Distributions 18)+ 9.2 The Relation of Meteors in Orbits of High ïnclination to the System of T,ong-Period Comets 186 9.3 An Intra-Solar System Origin for the Systen of Long-Period. Comets 493 9.3.a Meteoroid. Density 193 9.3.2 Conetary Cosmogony a9 )+ 9.3.3 Concl-usions 198 9. \ Future llork 200 APPENDTX 203 REFERENCES 2LL SUMMARY This thesis describes an investigation of the orbits of meteors cletected at Adelaide (tatitu¿e ¡5oS) using a combined. multi-stati.on e.w. and pulse rad.ar system. The orbit survey deseribed. is the only rad.io survey conducted. in the Southern Hemisphere to measure the orbits of indivÍd,ual- meteors d.own to a liniting rad.io magnitud.e of + 8. The equip- ment ¡¡as operated. for one rreek eaeh month from.,Deeember 1968 to Jr.me 1969 with a further rr:r¡ during October f969, To date ]1667 orbj-ts have been deterrnined from six months of d.ata. Reflections from a mininum of three and. a maximr:m of five points along the trail ¡¡ere used. to d.eternine the rad.iant and. velocity. A long- ôistance outstation enabled. occasional measu¡ements of refleetion point separations as large as l-6 kms., although the najority of reliably determined separations were.of the ord.er of 6 kns. or t"s=. The equip- ment was simultaneously use,d tc measure meteor region wind.s and wind shears, enabl-ing account to be taken of these factors in the d.etermina- tion of the rad.iant and. veJ-ocity d.ata. Distributions of the various geoeentrie and. helioeentrie quantities shol¡ broad- agreement with those from other surveys cond.ucted. along similar lines, althougþ the present clata eontain a significantly larger proportion of high velocity meteors than other surveys to a cornparable liniting magnitud.e. This ís attributeè to a selection effect in d.ata reduction as well as the use of the exbremely clear pre-specular reflec- tion point d.iffraction waveforr. available in a coherent phase system for the d.etermination of velocity. Measurements of d.eceleration have been carried. out for each meteor of the sì.rrvey. Althougþ a wicle range of d.ecelerations ar¡d. even accelera- tions was observed., no d.oubt in part d.ue to velocity measurement errors combined. with small. refleetion:point separations, the longer reflection point separations afford.ed. by the d,istant outstations have enabl-ed. com- putation of sr¡¡face areafmass ratios from measu¡ed. mean d.eeel-erations. Est'imates of the average mass, size and density of the meteors d.etected. have been maile, depend.ent uBon assì,uq)tions regarding the ablation energ¡, the ionizing effieiency and. the magnitude. The action of a height selection effect acting on meteor d.ensity is apparent. Conparison of the present d.ensity estinates with other d-ata indi- cates that average meteor bulk densities increase r¡ith d.ecreasing mass. This gives support for an aggloneration mod.el of meteor fornation, , although fragmentatíon does not seem to be pronouneeÈI anongst the present rad.io meteor popr:lation. In ad.d.ition to the ¡rreII-knovn helion, antihelion and. apex concen- trations of apparent meteor radlants this surve¡r confirms the existence of a lesser concentration eentred. on the longitud.e of the apex at ecl-iptic latitud.e - 6o0. Both this and the dpex concêntration are virLually removed. r¡hen aceount is taken of observational and. astronomi- eal seleetion factors although a strong exbend.ed. high latitud.e concen- tration remains. Comparison of the rad.iant d.istributi-ons with sinil-ar d.istributions for Northern Hemisphere data shows marked. symmetry ahout the ecliptic. The d.ata has been systematically seareÏ¡ed. for strea.n meteors an¿ the significa.nce of minor associations has been re-appraised.. Altogether )+O.\/" of the orbíts were found to be associated. with at least one other orbit wÍthin the linits of resolution of the neasulement technique. This figure drops to 2).8/o when associations of pairs only are exclud.ed.. Nunerous ninor streans with high inclination and. low eccentricity have been fountl at d.eep Southern d.eclinatÍons from Dece¡lber to March, T,r"ith littIe activity in this quarber during Jrxre and October. In actd.ition to several previously establ-ished. cometary associations a couprehensive search has inòicated. that 34 of the meteor associations found. may be related to 17 comets. Associations between several long- period. comets and 1ow eecentrieity high inelination streams appear in- ctisputable and confirm trre origin of the 'toroidal- group' meteoïs, previously a matter of some doubt. Prefaee Ilris thesis contains no naterial whicl¡ has been accepted. for the awarcl of any other degree or diploma in arry University. To the best of the authorls kno¡¡leclge and. belief , this thesis contains no material previously published or wrÍtten by another person, except where due reference,is matle in the te:ct of the thesis; (Cra¡rt GartrelL) oû1e nts Ttre project deseribed. in this thesis was carried. out within the Department of Physics of the University of Adelaid.e r:nder the super- vision of Dr. l[. G. E1ford.. The author would like to thank Dr. Elford. for suggesting the project, for helpfirl d.iscussions and. parbicularly for his reassurance and. encouragement througþout the course of the work. The author would also like to thank Dr. C., S. Nilsson for suggestions d.uring the latter stages of the project. The buil-d.ing, operation a¡d. maintenance of the rad.io meteor system Ìras very mueh a cooperative coneern. Without, the assistance of a number of people the work outlined in this thesis r¡ou1d have been impossible. The author is ind-ebted. to his colleague Dr. B. J. McAvaney, who, in collaboration with Mr. J. Irl. Srûith, designed. some of the outstation and tape d.eIay system equipment. Dr. MeAvaney also shared. with the author the responsibility for operation and maintenance of the nulti-station system. Thanks are al-so due to Mr. N. Bro¡rn for assisting with the equipnent operation.
Recommended publications
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Species and Meteor Activity 5 Discussion J
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 18705–18726, 2009 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/18705/2009/ Chemistry ACPD © Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under and Physics 9, 18705–18726, 2009 the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Discussions This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry Metal species and and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP if available. meteor activity J. Correira et al. Title Page Metal concentrations in the upper Abstract Introduction atmosphere during meteor showers Conclusions References J. Correira1,*, A. C. Aikin1, J. M. Grebowsky2, and J. P. Burrows3 Tables Figures 1 The Catholic University of America, Institute for Astrophysics and Computational Sciences J I Department of Physics, Washington, DC 20064, USA 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 695, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA J I 3Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany Back Close *now at: Computational Physics, Inc., Springfield, Virginia, USA Full Screen / Esc Received: 30 June 2009 – Accepted: 10 August 2009 – Published: 10 September 2009 Correspondence to: J. Correira ([email protected]) Printer-friendly Version Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Interactive Discussion 18705 Abstract ACPD Using the nadir-viewing Global Ozone Measuring Experiment (GOME) UV/VIS spec- trometer on the ERS-2 satellite, we investigate short term variations in the vertical mag- 9, 18705–18726, 2009 nesium column densities in the atmosphere and any connection to possible enhanced 5 mass deposition during a meteor shower. Time-dependent mass influx rates are de- Metal species and rived for all the major meteor showers using published estimates of mass density and meteor activity temporal profiles of meteor showers.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications in Observations
    ISSN 0917-7388 COMMUNICATIONS IN CMO Since 1986 MARS No.383 10 April 2011 OBSERVATIONS No.09 PublishedbytheInternational Society of the Mars Observers The Craters of Mars By William SHEEHAN n November 1915, the First World War was rag‐ assistant astronomer at Yerkes Observatory in Iing in Europe. The Allies had started an offensive Southern Wisconsin, John Edward Mellish (1886~ on the Western Front; thedailyravagesofgales 1970), took advantage of the exceptional observing and illness were requiring three hundred men to be conditions to make one of the most remarkable ob‐ evacuated every day. Although America had not servations of Mars ever made. yet entered the war ‐‐ the sinking of the Lusitania Mellish had been born on his maternal grandfa‐ was still months away ‐‐ it was exerting itself in ther’s farm three miles south of Cottage Grove, Central America and the Caribbean, defying British Wisconsin (near Madison). He had received four tolls in the Panama canal zone and assuming a vir‐ years of formal schooling, which was all the time he tual protectorate over Haiti. needed to finish the curriculum. At sixteen, he ob‐ In Berlin, a pacifist professor of physics, Albert tained a four dollar spyglass; it was unsatisfactory, Einstein, completing work on the General Theory of but he saved enough money for a two‐inch refrac‐ Relativity, used the new theory of gravitation to tor, which was large enough to whet a burgeoning produce a small correction to that of Newton ex‐ astronomical interest. “With it, I was able to see plaining a hitherto unexplained excess in the pre‐ many new stars,” he later recalled.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 598, A40 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629659 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics Separation and confirmation of showers? L. Neslušan1 and M. Hajduková, Jr.2 1 Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 05960 Tatranska Lomnica, Slovak Republic e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 84504 Bratislava, Slovak Republic e-mail: [email protected] Received 6 September 2016 / Accepted 30 October 2016 ABSTRACT Aims. Using IAU MDC photographic, IAU MDC CAMS video, SonotaCo video, and EDMOND video databases, we aim to separate all provable annual meteor showers from each of these databases. We intend to reveal the problems inherent in this procedure and answer the question whether the databases are complete and the methods of separation used are reliable. We aim to evaluate the statistical significance of each separated shower. In this respect, we intend to give a list of reliably separated showers rather than a list of the maximum possible number of showers. Methods. To separate the showers, we simultaneously used two methods. The use of two methods enables us to compare their results, and this can indicate the reliability of the methods. To evaluate the statistical significance, we suggest a new method based on the ideas of the break-point method. Results. We give a compilation of the showers from all four databases using both methods. Using the first (second) method, we separated 107 (133) showers, which are in at least one of the databases used. These relatively low numbers are a consequence of discarding any candidate shower with a poor statistical significance.
    [Show full text]
  • 17. a Working List of Meteor Streams
    PRECEDING PAGE BLANK NOT FILMED. 17. A Working List of Meteor Streams ALLAN F. COOK Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, Massachusetts HIS WORKING LIST which starts on the next is convinced do exist. It is perhaps still too corn- page has been compiled from the following prehensive in that there arc six streams with sources: activity near the threshold of detection by pho- tography not related to any known comet and (1) A selection by myself (Cook, 1973) from not sho_m to be active for as long as a decade. a list by Lindblad (1971a), which he found Unless activity can be confirmed in earlier or from a computer search among 2401 orbits of later years or unless an associated comet ap- meteors photographed by the Harvard Super- pears, these streams should probably be dropped Sehmidt cameras in New Mexico (McCrosky and from a later version of this list. The author will Posen, 1961) be much more receptive to suggestions for dele- (2) Five additional radiants found by tions from this list than he will be to suggestions McCrosky and Posen (1959) by a visual search for additions I;o it. Clear evidence that the thresh- among the radiants and velocities of the same old for visual detection of a stream has been 2401 meteors passed (as in the case of the June Lyrids) should (3) A further visual search among these qualify it for permanent inclusion. radiants and velocities by Cook, Lindblad, A comment on the matching sets of orbits is Marsden, McCrosky, and Posen (1973) in order. It is the directions of perihelion that (4) A computer search
    [Show full text]
  • Meteor Shower Detection with Density-Based Clustering
    Meteor Shower Detection with Density-Based Clustering Glenn Sugar1*, Althea Moorhead2, Peter Brown3, and William Cooke2 1Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 2NASA Meteoroid Environment Office, Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, 35812 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Western Ontario, London N6A3K7, Canada *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present a new method to detect meteor showers using the Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise algorithm (DBSCAN; Ester et al. 1996). DBSCAN is a modern cluster detection algorithm that is well suited to the problem of extracting meteor showers from all-sky camera data because of its ability to efficiently extract clusters of different shapes and sizes from large datasets. We apply this shower detection algorithm on a dataset that contains 25,885 meteor trajectories and orbits obtained from the NASA All-Sky Fireball Network and the Southern Ontario Meteor Network (SOMN). Using a distance metric based on solar longitude, geocentric velocity, and Sun-centered ecliptic radiant, we find 25 strong cluster detections and 6 weak detections in the data, all of which are good matches to known showers. We include measurement errors in our analysis to quantify the reliability of cluster occurrence and the probability that each meteor belongs to a given cluster. We validate our method through false positive/negative analysis and with a comparison to an established shower detection algorithm. 1. Introduction A meteor shower and its stream is implicitly defined to be a group of meteoroids moving in similar orbits sharing a common parentage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comet's Tale
    THE COMET’S TALE Journal of the Comet Section of the British Astronomical Association Number 33, 2014 January Not the Comet of the Century 2013 R1 (Lovejoy) imaged by Damian Peach on 2013 December 24 using 106mm F5. STL-11k. LRGB. L: 7x2mins. RGB: 1x2mins. Today’s images of bright binocular comets rival drawings of Great Comets of the nineteenth century. Rather predictably the expected comet of the century Contents failed to materialise, however several of the other comets mentioned in the last issue, together with the Comet Section contacts 2 additional surprise shown above, put on good From the Director 2 appearances. 2011 L4 (PanSTARRS), 2012 F6 From the Secretary 3 (Lemmon), 2012 S1 (ISON) and 2013 R1 (Lovejoy) all Tales from the past 5 th became brighter than 6 magnitude and 2P/Encke, 2012 RAS meeting report 6 K5 (LINEAR), 2012 L2 (LINEAR), 2012 T5 (Bressi), Comet Section meeting report 9 2012 V2 (LINEAR), 2012 X1 (LINEAR), and 2013 V3 SPA meeting - Rob McNaught 13 (Nevski) were all binocular objects. Whether 2014 will Professional tales 14 bring such riches remains to be seen, but three comets The Legacy of Comet Hunters 16 are predicted to come within binocular range and we Project Alcock update 21 can hope for some new discoveries. We should get Review of observations 23 some spectacular close-up images of 67P/Churyumov- Prospects for 2014 44 Gerasimenko from the Rosetta spacecraft. BAA COMET SECTION NEWSLETTER 2 THE COMET’S TALE Comet Section contacts Director: Jonathan Shanklin, 11 City Road, CAMBRIDGE. CB1 1DP England. Phone: (+44) (0)1223 571250 (H) or (+44) (0)1223 221482 (W) Fax: (+44) (0)1223 221279 (W) E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected] WWW page : http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jds/ Assistant Director (Observations): Guy Hurst, 16 Westminster Close, Kempshott Rise, BASINGSTOKE, Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 X 11 Long.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85349-1 - Meteor Showers and their Parent Comets Peter Jenniskens Index More information Index a – semimajor axis 58 twin shower 440 A – albedo 111, 586 fragmentation index 444 A1 – radial nongravitational force 15 meteoroid density 444 A2 – transverse, in plane, nongravitational force 15 potential parent bodies 448–453 A3 – transverse, out of plane, nongravitational a-Centaurids 347–348 force 15 1980 outburst 348 A2 – effect 239 a-Circinids (1977) 198 ablation 595 predictions 617 ablation coefficient 595 a-Lyncids (1971) 198 carbonaceous chondrite 521 predictions 617 cometary matter 521 a-Monocerotids 183 ordinary chondrite 521 1925 outburst 183 absolute magnitude 592 1935 outburst 183 accretion 86 1985 outburst 183 hierarchical 86 1995 peak rate 188 activity comets, decrease with distance from Sun 1995 activity profile 188 Halley-type comets 100 activity 186 Jupiter-family comets 100 w 186 activity curve meteor shower 236, 567 dust trail width 188 air density at meteor layer 43 lack of sodium 190 airborne astronomy 161 meteoroid density 190 1899 Leonids 161 orbital period 188 1933 Leonids 162 predictions 617 1946 Draconids 165 upper mass cut-off 188 1972 Draconids 167 a-Pyxidids (1979) 199 1976 Quadrantids 167 predictions 617 1998 Leonids 221–227 a-Scorpiids 511 1999 Leonids 233–236 a-Virginids 503 2000 Leonids 240 particle density 503 2001 Leonids 244 amorphous water ice 22 2002 Leonids 248 Andromedids 153–155, 380–384 airglow 45 1872 storm 380–384 albedo (A) 16, 586 1885 storm 380–384 comet 16 1899
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain 20–23 September, 2012
    ISBN 978-2-87355-024-4 Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain 20–23 September, 2012 Published by the International Meteor Organization 2013 Edited by Marc Gyssens and Paul Roggemans Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain, 20–23 September, 2012 International Meteor Organization ISBN 978-2-87355-024-4 Copyright notices c 2013 The International Meteor Organization The copyright of papers in this publication remains with the authors. It is the aim of the IMO to increase the spread of scientific information, not to restrict it. When material is submitted to the IMO for publication, this is taken as indicating that the author(s) grant(s) permission for the IMO to publish this material any number of times, in any format(s), without payment. This permission is taken as covering rights to reproduce both the content of the material and its form and appearance, including images and typesetting. Formats may include paper and electronically readable storage media. Other than these conditions, all rights remain with the author(s). When material is submitted for publication, this is also taken as indicating that the author(s) claim(s) the right to grant the permissions described above. The reader is granted permission to make unaltered copies of any part of the document for personal use, as well as for non-commercial and unpaid sharing of the information with third parties, provided the source and publisher are mentioned. For any other type of copying or distribution, prior written permission from the publisher is mandatory.
    [Show full text]
  • 812 Ta Ta Basalt Depletion, 820474 Melanesian Basin, 610705, 610707
    812 Ta T Ta 910437, 920026, 920117, 920265, 920291 Guaymas Basin, 650644 basalt Panama, Pacific Ocean, 950217 laumontite, 670551 depletion, 820474 pumice, source, 850821 mineralogy Melanesian Basin, 610705, 610707 Volcanic rocks, petrography, alkalic Mariana Islands, 600458 Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 820442, 820445, 820446 island, 200691 Mariana Trench, 600458 midocean ridge, 820396, 820417, 820449, Taif, Saudi Arabia, Red Sea, geology, 230813 Mariana Trough, 600457 820450 Tairyo Formation, 061289 minerals, chemical composition, 600461 hygromagmaphile element, 820460, 820461, Taito Fracture Zone, 870740 Panama Basin, sediments, 690386, 690392 820462, 820464, 820467, 820468 Nankai Trough, heat flow, 870740 Patton Escarpment, petrography, 630687, fractionation, absence, 820460 Taiwan, 061289, 660661, 780578, 840767 630701 nonfractionating pairs, 820467 basin genesis, 310874 Shatskiy Plateau S, 200683 trace elements, 660732 Ryukyu Islands, 310863 temperature, 670551 Goban Spur, 800944 Philippine Basin, genesis, 310863 X-ray diffraction analysis result, 920492 see also tantalum Philippine Sea, Paleogene-Neogene, 310837 Tallahatta Formation, 950365, 950369, 950370 Ta/Hf ratio Philippines Talme Yafe borehole, Mediterranean Sea E, basalt, 820474, 820475 genesis, 310874 history, 42B1202 hygromagmaphile element, 820464, 820465 plate, 600928 Talparo Formation, 040599 Ta/La ratio planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy, Tamabra limestone, talus, 770397, 770404 hygromagmaphile element, 820645 310679 Tamatave, Rio Grande Rise N, regional trace elements,
    [Show full text]
  • Meteor Activity Outlook for January 2-8, 2021
    Meteor Activity Outlook for January 2-8, 2021 Daniel Bush captured this impressive fireball at 04:11 UT (23:11 CDT on Sept. 5) on 6 Septmeber 2020, from Albany, Missouri, USA. For more details on this particular event visit: https://fireball.amsmeteors.org/members/imo_view/event/2020/5020. Credit Daniel Bush January is best known for the Quadrantids, which have the potential of being the best shower of the year. Unfortunately, this shower is short lived and occurs during some of the worst weather in the northern hemisphere. Due to the high northern declination (celestial latitude) and short summer nights, little of this activity can be seen south of the equator. There are many very minor showers active throughout the month. Unfortunately, most of these produce less than 1 shower member per hour and do not add much to the overall activity total. Activity gets interesting as seen from the southern hemisphere as ill-defined radiants in Vela, Carina, and Crux become active this month. This activity occurs during the entire first quarter of the year and moves eastward into Centaurus in February and ends in March with activity in Norma and Lupus. Sporadic rates are generally similar in both hemispheres this month. Sporadic rates are falling though for observers in the northern hemisphere and rising as seen from the southern hemisphere. During this period, the moon reaches its last quarter phase on Wednesday January 6th. At this time, the moon is located 90 degrees west of the sun in the sky and will rise near midnight standard time.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Morelian Meteoroid Impact on Mexican Environment
    atmosphere Article Assessment of Morelian Meteoroid Impact on Mexican Environment Maria A. Sergeeva 1,2,*, Vladislav V. Demyanov 3,4, Olga A. Maltseva 5 , Artem Mokhnatkin 6, Mario Rodriguez-Martinez 7 , Raul Gutierrez 7, Artem M. Vesnin 3, Victor Jose Gatica-Acevedo 1,8, Juan Americo Gonzalez-Esparza 1 , Mark E. Fedorov 4, Tatiana V. Ishina 4, Marni Pazos 9, Luis Xavier Gonzalez 1,2, Pedro Corona-Romero 1,2, Julio Cesar Mejia-Ambriz 1,2, Jose Juan Gonzalez-Aviles 1,2, Ernesto Aguilar-Rodriguez 1, Enrique Cabral-Cano 10 , Blanca Mendoza 11, Esmeralda Romero-Hernandez 12, Ramon Caraballo 1 and Isaac David Orrala-Legorreta 1,13 1 SCiESMEX, LANCE, Instituto de Geofisica, Unidad Michoacan, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Morelia, Michoacan C.P. 58089, Mexico; [email protected] (V.J.G.-A.); americo@igeofisica.unam.mx (J.A.G.-E.); xavier@igeofisica.unam.mx (L.X.G.); p.coronaromero@igeofisica.unam.mx (P.C.-R.); jcmejia@geofisica.unam.mx (J.C.M.-A.); jjgonzalez@igeofisica.unam.mx (J.J.G.-A.); ernesto@igeofisica.unam.mx (E.A.-R.); rcaraballo@igeofisica.unam.mx (R.C.); [email protected] (I.D.O.-L.) 2 CONACYT, Instituto de Geofisica, Unidad Michoacan, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Morelia, Michoacan C.P. 58089, Mexico 3 Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia; [email protected] (V.V.D.); [email protected] (A.M.V.) 4 Irkutsk State Transport University, 664074 Irkutsk, Russia; [email protected] (M.E.F.); [email protected] (T.V.I.) 5 Institute for Physics, Southern Federal University, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia; [email protected] Citation: Sergeeva, M.A.; Demyanov, 6 Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 125047 Moscow, Russia; V.V.; Maltseva, O.A.; Mokhnatkin, A.; [email protected] 7 Rodriguez-Martinez, M.; Gutierrez, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Morelia, Michoacan C.P.
    [Show full text]