SUB-REGIONAL CENTRE

1) Bangor

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh * This site has planning permission as POLICY TAI14, T1 - 1552 Water (Mr Dewi Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Goetra Uchaf, Bangor Griffiths ) [2680] make No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks a deletion of a site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an extensive range of supporting evidence that demonstrates the housing requirement over the JLDP period and has also identified the necessary infrastructure required to support the development. The Abolish plans to develop 1) the old Friars sites allocated within the plan are site on Ffriddoedd Road 2) the Pen y consistent with the overall plan Strategy CPERA (Cynghorydd POLICY TAI14, T2 - Ffridd site 3) check that there are no and are deliverable within the plan period 113 Elin Walker Jones) Former Friars School Object plans to develop the area between to enable the JLDP to meet the identified [2760] Playing Field, Bangor Ffordd Eithinog and Bryn Eithinog - build housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. on brownfield and not greenfield Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a suite of policies and supporting text that explains how development will be managed within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the

1 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation

It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site.

No Change

Not Accepted The representation seeks a deletion of a site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing I would like to see the justification for the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an proposing the former Friars site - where extensive range of supporting evidence did this appear and what justification is that demonstrates the housing there for building on this site? It is a requirement over the JLDP period and has mistake to build more houses without also identified the necessary infrastructure carefully considering the infrastructure CPERA (Cynghorydd POLICY TAI14, T2 - required to support the development. The and amenities and there needs to be 1419 Elin Walker Jones) Former Friars School Object sites allocated within the plan are planning to ensure that amenities and [2760] Playing Field, Bangor consistent with the overall plan Strategy infrastructure plans are an integral part and are deliverable within the plan period of any plans for more housing. I would to enable the JLDP to meet the identified like to see us collecting our own data, housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. basing our need for housing on data Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a rather than on the Welsh Government's suite of policies and supporting text that figures. explains how development will be managed within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary

2 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation

It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site.

No Change

* This site may be at a height where mains water cannot be guaranteed at all times. Under the Water Industry Act Comments Noted 1991, DCWW are not obliged to provide The Councils will continue to engage with mains water to a height greater than that DCWW at the planning application stage. it will flow by gravity from the service Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T2 - reservoir or tank the supply is taken. As Recommendation 1553 Water (Mr Dewi Former Friars School Object such it is likely that a hydraulic modelling No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Playing Field, Bangor assessment will be required to establish if matters raised. improvements are required to the water network to supply water to this site. Any No Change requirement to upgrade our water network can be acquired through the water requisition provisions of the Water

3 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Industry. * The public sewerage network can Comments Noted accept the potential foul flows from the The Councils will continue to engage with proposed development site. DCWW at the planning application stage. * The proposed growth being promoted Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T2 - for this settlement would require Recommendation 1554 Water (Mr Dewi Former Friars School Object improvements at Treborth Wastewater No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Playing Field, Bangor Treatment Works (WwTW) which would matters raised. need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier No Change through developer contributions. Note the Support Council for the POLICY TAI14, T3 - T3 is a small redevelopment site which Protection of Rural 671 Former Jewsons Site, Support has been empty for some time. T3 is Recommendation Wales (Mr Noel Bangor broadly acceptable to us. Davey) [1169] No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * The site would eventually drain to the Bangor Beach Road SPS and an Comments Noted assessment of this SPS may be required The Councils will continue to engage with to establish whether flows from this site DCWW at the planning application stage. can be accommodated or whether future Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T3 - improvements would be required to the Recommendation 1556 Water (Mr Dewi Former Jewsons Site, Object SPS to allow development to proceed. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Bangor * The proposed growth being promoted matters raised. for this settlement would require improvements at Treborth Wastewater No Change Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. Natural Resources POLICY TAI14, T4 - The housing allocation T4 is within flood Accepted 104 Object Wales (Mr Gareth Former Crosville Site, zone C2 of Welsh Government's TAN15: Gwynedd Consultancy was commissioned

4 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Thomas) [2757] Bangor Development Advice Maps. TAN15 to undertake a stage 2 SFCA which shows confirms highly vulnerable developments that the site does not comply with the should not be located within such areas. requirements of TAN15. A Strategic Flood Consequences Assessment has been completed, but this Recommendation site was not included within any such The allocation should be removed from the assessment. The SFCA, section 9.3 states plan and a suitable alternative found in its that none of the allocations fall within place in order to ensure internal zones C1 or C2. consistency of the plan and to conform to Separate Call-In procedures exist where National Policy Guidance. more than 10 dwellings located within zone C2 would need to be called in by the Focussed Change NF112, NF77 Local Planning Authority to the Welsh Government for direction. The flood risk has not been assessed.

Remove allocation T4 from the Joint Local Development Plan, with possible substitution with a suitable alternative sites outside of flood zones C1 and C2 Council for the T4 is a small redevelopment site which POLICY TAI14, T4 - Protection of Rural has been empty for some time. T4 would 672 Former Crosville Site, Object Wales (Mr Noel seem vulnerable to flooding and Bangor Davey) [1169] therefore inappropriate for housing. The land is located with flood zone C2 of the Welsh Government's TAN15: Development Advice Maps. Developing Cyfoeth Naturiol this land for residential use would Cymru / Natural POLICY TAI14, T4 - contradict national policy guidance 1084 Resource Wales Former Crosville Site, Object contained within TAN15. NRW (Ymgynhoriadau Bangor recommends that either a stage 2 or Cynllunio) [1521] stage 3 SFCA is prepared and forwarded to NRW for further assessment to demonstrate that developing this site for

5 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan residential use would comply with the requirements of TAN15 or that this allocation is removed from the Local Development Plan. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * The site would eventually drain to the Bangor Beach Road SPS and an Comments Noted assessment of this SPS may be required The Councils will continue to engage with to establish whether flows from this site DCWW at the planning application stage. can be accommodated or whether future Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T4 - improvements would be required to the Recommendation 1555 Water (Mr Dewi Former Crosville Site, Object SPS to allow development to proceed. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Bangor * The proposed growth being promoted matters raised. for this settlement would require improvements at Treborth Wastewater No Change Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions The proposed sites in Bangor include a green field site (T5) opposite the Note the Support Council for the crematorium, adjacent to the POLICY TAI14, T5 - Protection of Rural development boundary and within the 669 Land opposite The Support Recommendation Wales (Mr Noel SLA; this has good access and may not be Crematorium, Bangor Davey) [1169] convenient for agricultural use as it is No Change separated from other fields. T5 is broadly acceptable to us. The proposed allocation of circa 72 Note the Support residential units on T5 is supported for POLICY TAI14, T5 - RCH Douglas the following reasons: 1293 Land opposite The Support Recommendation Pennant [3070] - Deliverability - Positive Planning Crematorium, Bangor - Allocated Housing Numbers No Change - Development Principle

6 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan - Opportunities and constraints- App 1 - Indicative Masterplan - App 2 - Positive Sustainability Appraisal Not Accepted The representation seeks a deletion of a site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an The City Council are of the opinion that: extensive range of supporting evidence - The site is located in a prominent and that demonstrates the housing attractive rural location, divorced from requirement over the JLDP period and has the built up area of the City of Bangor also identified the necessary infrastructure and the shopping, community facilities required to support the development. The and services it provides. It would sites allocated within the plan are therefore not be sustainable consistent with the overall plan Strategy development as it would encourage the and are deliverable within the plan period use of motor cars in order to take to enable the JLDP to meet the identified advantage of these facilities. housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. 1299 Cyngor Dinas Bangor POLICY TAI14, T5 - - It would extend a ribbon development Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a & (Mr Gwyn Hughes) Land opposite The Object into an attractive rural landscape to the suite of policies and supporting text that 1345 [1523] Crematorium, Bangor detriment of the character and visual explains how development will be amenities of the area. managed within the areas of change, and - The site occupies a prominent location the mechanisms by which the necessary when viewed from the adjoining highway infrastructure, services and facilities will be and buildings erected thereon would secured. This policy framework also dominate the skyline and cause serious includes the Councils’ requirement to injury to the visual amenities of the area. mitigate potential impacts of development - The residential allocation of the site in relation to enhancing and protecting the should be re-considered and the natural and built environment, provision of development boundary re-drawn to sustainable transport, community facilities, exclude the site. environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

7 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Recommendation

It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary.

No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * Off-site sewers would be required to Comments Noted connect to the public sewerage network. The Councils will continue to engage with These can be provided through the sewer DCWW at the planning application stage. requisition scheme under Sections 98- Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T5 - 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. Recommendation 1557 Water (Mr Dewi Land opposite The Object * The proposed growth being promoted No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Crematorium, Bangor for this settlement would require matters raised. improvements at Treborth Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) which would No Change need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. The Proposals Map for Bangor excludes Accepted the property Derwen Deg from the Development boundaries are drawn settlement boundary together with other around the urban form of settlements. The properties fronting to Hwfa Road. The properties along Ffordd Hwfa and Derwen 912 Plan should be modified to include these Deg are considered to be part of Bangor’s Dr Dewi Roberts & Map 1 - Bangor Object existing properties within the Settlement urban form. [3096] 915 Boundary. Derwen Deg is a long established property, build 18??, that Recommendation formed an important part of the original To ensure the internal consistency of the expansion of the city in the late Victorian plan the development boundary should be period and the development of the amended to include both the properties on

8 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan University. The Conservation Area Ffordd Hwfa and Derwen Deg. boundary includes the property and recognizes its importance as part of the Focussed Change NF113 built environment. The land use shown on that plan clearly shows the house and its curtilage as part of the existing housing whilst the surrounding oak woodland and green spaces that provide the setting for the built environment are rightly protected. We wish to propose a site off Siliwen Road to be included in the development boundary of Bangor. The site is identified as being located immediately adjoining the development boundary in 3 directions. It is considered that the Not Accepted continuation of the development Development boundaries are drawn boundary as shown on the attached plan around the urban form of settlements. The would form a logical and reasonable site in question is not considered to be part extension to the development boundary of the Bangor’s urban form. of Bangor. The site is well integrated with 913 CatrinEames[3097] Map1-Bangor Object and connected to the existing pattern of Recommendation development along Siliwen Road. The site Amending the development boundary is would sensitively infill a small gap not considered necessary to ensure the between existing housing. soundness of the Plan.

We wish to seek that the development No Change boundary of Bangor be extended to include the land off Siliwen Road as shown on the attached plan which will form a logical and reasonable extension to the development boundary. Mr Bleddyn Hughes Site SP270 as amended is a natural infill Not Accepted 1020 Map 1 - Bangor Object [68] and would be in line with existing The representation seeks the inclusion of a

9 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan dwellings already included within the new site not included within the Deposit Deposit Plan boundary and is a natural Plan. Having considered the policy context, extension to the settlement. The Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other development of this site answers all the relevant material factors, it is considered criteria listed within the SA Framework that there is no demonstrable need to offering housing to local people who include the site within the Plan. work local. It takes account of the relevant community strategy. It is poor Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, agricultural land which would lend itself supporting text and documentation have to housing and would not unduly set out how the Council proposes to encroach into open countryside. The manage the delivery of new development alleged traffic issues in Penrhosgarnedd including details on infrastructure planning. are not insurmountable. The LDP therefore demonstrates how We wish the Deposit Plan boundary to development can be managed, phased and include site SP270 as amended. impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change The plan fails to provide for sufficient Not Accepted housing in the sub regional centre of The representation seeks the inclusion of a Bangor to meet its target growth level of new site not included within the Deposit 1022 MrREllerby[3185] Map1-Bangor Object 969 dwelling units. This site would help to Plan. Having considered the policy context, address this deficit and its sustainable Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other well screened location would form a relevant material factors, it is considered logical extension to the urban form of the that there is no demonstrable need to

10 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan settlement. include the site within the Plan.

Redrafting of the development boundary Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, for Bangor indicated on Inset Map 1 to supporting text and documentation have include this site and its designation as a set out how the Council proposes to housing allocation without planning manage the delivery of new development permission. including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the LDP.

No Change Comment Noted In preparing the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an extensive range of supporting I would like to verify that the identified evidence that demonstrates the housing area on Ffordd Eithinog does not include requirement over the JLDP period and has CPERA (Cynghorydd the drover's road between Bryn Eithinog also identified the necessary infrastructure 1416 Elin Walker Jones) Map 1 - Bangor Object and Ffordd Eithinog. In addition, with required to support the development. The [2760] regards to specific sites, I would like to sites allocated within the plan are see Pen y Ffridd be deleted entirely. consistent with the overall plan Strategy and are deliverable within the plan period to enable the JLDP to meet the identified housing needs of the plan area up to 2026.

11 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a suite of policies and supporting text that explains how development will be managed within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation No change is required to address the matters raised.

No Change

Accepted Cyngor Dinas Bangor Established open space with recreational 1302 (Mr Gwyn Hughes) value [1523] Identify Pen y Bryn Gardens and Penrhyn Map 1 – Bangor Object Recommendation Arms as protected open Space Bangor Civic Society Identfy as protected open space on Inset 1383 (Mr Don Mathew) Map [2988] Focussed Change NF114

12 URBAN SERVICE CENTRE

2) Amlwch

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan At least 10% should be starter homes for Cyngor Tref Amlwch POLICY TAI14, T6 - young local people - our youngsters are Note the Support 687 (Mrs M Hughes) Land near Maes Support leaving the area due to the lack of Policy TAI9 aims to secure an appropriate [1266] Mona, Amlwch employment. Population is important to level of affordable housing in the Plan area Amlwch. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * The public sewerage network can Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T6 - accept the potential foul flows from the 1558 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Maes Support proposed development site. Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Mona, Amlwch * Amlwch Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul No Change flows from the proposed development sites/growth figure. At least 10% should be starter homes for Cyngor Tref Amlwch POLICY TAI14, T7 - young local people - our youngsters are Note the Support 689 (Mrs M Hughes) Land near Lôn Bach, Support leaving the area due to the lack of Policy TAI9 aims to secure an appropriate [1266] Amlwch employment. Population is important to level of affordable housing in the Plan area Amlwch * A water supply can be providedto serve this site. * The public sewerage network can accept the potential foul flows from the Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T7 - proposed development site. Potential 1559 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Lôn Bach, Support developers need to be aware that this Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Amlwch site is crossed by a sewer and protection measures in the form of easement widths No Change or a diversion of the pipe would be required, which may impact upon the housing density achievable on site.

13 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Amlwch Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from these proposed development sites/growth figure. At least 10% should be starter homes for Cyngor Tref Amlwch POLICY TAI14, T8 - young local people - our youngsters are Note the Support 691 (Mrs M Hughes) Land at Madryn Farm, Support leaving the area due to the lack of Policy TAI9 aims to secure an appropriate [1266] Amlwch employment. Population is important to level of affordable housing in the Plan area. Amlwch. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * The public sewerage network can accept the potential foul flows from the proposed development site. Potential developers need to be aware that this Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T8 - site is crossed by a sewer and protection Note the Support 1560 Water (Mr Dewi Land at Madryn Farm, Support measures in the form of easement widths Griffiths ) [2680] Amlwch or a diversion of the pipe would be required, which may impact upon the housing density achievable on site. * Amlwch Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from these proposed development sites/growth figure. At least 10% should be starter homes for Cyngor Tref Amlwch POLICY TAI14, T9 - young local people - out youngsters are Note the Support 693 (Mrs M Hughes) Land near Rheinwas Support leaving the area due to the lack of Policy TAI9 aims to secure an appropriate [1266] Field, Amlwch employment. Population is important to level of affordable housing in the Plan area. Amlwch. * Off-site water mains may be required to Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T9 - serve the site. These can be provided 1561 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Rheinwas Support through a water requisition scheme Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Field, Amlwch under Sections 41 - 44 of the Water Industry Act 1991. No Change

14 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Off-site sewers would be required to connect to the public sewerage network. These can be provided through the sewer requisition scheme under Sections 98- 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. * Amlwch Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from these proposed development sites/growth figure. Concern with this site as there is a Not Accepted problem with surface water. The representation seeks a deletion of a site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing Cyngor Tref Amlwch POLICY TAI14, T10 - The Council feel that if these building the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an 685 (Mrs M Hughes) Land near Tan y Bryn Object areas become reality, that at least 10% extensive range of supporting evidence [1266] Amlwch should be starter homes for young local that demonstrates the housing people - our youngsters are leaving the requirement over the JLDP period and has area due to lack of employment. also identified the necessary infrastructure Population is important to Amlwch. required to support the development. The sites allocated within the plan are consistent with the overall plan Strategy and are deliverable within the plan period to enable the JLDP to meet the identified housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. Candidate site T10 includes land owned Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a by the applicants for which permission is suite of policies and supporting text that POLICY TAI14, T10 - refused. Development on site may deny Mr Chris Jones explains how development will be 1377 Land near Tan y Bryn Object legal rights of access to site by occupier [1683] managed within the areas of change, and Amlwch of Tan y Bryn. the mechanisms by which the necessary infrastructure, services and facilities will be Removal of T10 from development plan. secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of

15 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary.

No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * The public sewerage network can Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T10 - accept the potential foul flows from the 1562 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Tan y Bryn Support proposed development site. Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Amlwch * Amlwch Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul No Change flows from these proposed development sites/growth figure. The site is in perfect location for Not Accepted development especially with the inclusion The representation seeks the inclusion of a of site SP561. It would enhance all new site not included within the Deposit aspects of Amlwch and remove the Plan. Having considered the policy context, current eyesore that effects Amlwch and Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Mr Hugh Rowlands 931 Map 2 - Amlwch Object the future development of SP561 (who relevant material factors, it is considered [3115] wants to buy a house next to a site for fly that there is no demonstrable need to tipping!). It would provide much needed include the site within the Plan. affordable housing, with the minimum transport infrastructure development Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, costs and disturbance to the residents. supporting text and documentation have

16 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Any infrastructure development required set out how the Council proposes to for drainage works wold only reduce the manage the delivery of new development potential of flood risk not only to the site including details on infrastructure planning. but also the rest of Amlwch. The site The LDP therefore demonstrates how should be included within the development can be managed, phased and development for housing to help meet impacts mitigated. It is considered that the the settlements needs. LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Site was filtered from the Candidate Site process at the 1st stage as the majority of the site falls within a C2 flood risk zone. No evidence to the contrary has been provided by the respondent.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change The reason for my objection is as follows Not Accepted in that from a consistency basis the Rhos The representation seeks the inclusion of a Place development is an ideal new site not included within the Deposit "alternative site" to maximise the land Plan. Having considered the policy context, Dafydd Ioan Hughes footprint available as part of the Deposit Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other 1201 Map 2 - Amlwch Object [2083] plan. Amlwch has been designated as a relevant material factors, it is considered primary growth area as part of the overall that there is no demonstrable need to development plan and this particular site include the site within the Plan. lends itself to mirror the SP561 development and allow for an infilling Furthermore, the Plan’s policies,

17 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan development which would enhance both supporting text and documentation have the landscape, infrastructure and provide set out how the Council proposes to a much needed mixture of housing manage the delivery of new development development right in the middle of including details on infrastructure planning. Amlwch. Access to the highway and The LDP therefore demonstrates how amenities are all walking distance and the development can be managed, phased and Sustainability Matrix addresses the 11 impacts mitigated. It is considered that the key points. LDP meets the tests of soundness without There appears also to be planning history the need for a different approach such as a on this particular site in that in January new settlement or the suggested 1978 Anglesey alternative site to deliver the identified Borough Council granted themselves housing and employment needs. deemed permission as housing authority in respect of this particular site Site was filtered from the Candidate Site reaffirming the land's suitability for process at the 1st stage as the majority of residential development. the site falls within a C2 flood risk zone. No evidence to the contrary has been provided by the respondent.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change My client has a plot of development land Not Accepted adjacent to a JLDP considered site in The representation seeks the inclusion of a Amwlch (T10). We believe that including new site not included within the Deposit this site would improve the housing Plan. Having considered the policy context, Mr Lloyd Williams 1395 Map 2 - Amlwch Object policy TAI14. Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other [2838] - Within walking distance to community relevant material factors, it is considered facilities that there is no demonstrable need to - All main services present include the site within the Plan. - Land available for development during

18 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan plan period Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, - Low visual and landscape impact supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Issues raised during the Candidate Site Assessment processed highlighted the inadequate visibility at the junction with the A5025 and capacity of Lôn Bach.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the LDP.

No Change

3) Holyhead

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T11 - * This site has planning permission as Note the Support 1563 Water (Mr Dewi Tyddyn Bach, Support such we have no further comment to Griffiths ) [2680] Holyhead make. Recommendation

19 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks a deletion of a site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an extensive range of supporting evidence that demonstrates the housing The AONB, SAC and SPA will all be requirement over the JLDP period and has adversely affected by the proximity and also identified the necessary infrastructure the amount of additional proposed required to support the development. The housing developments. sites allocated within the plan are Pluvial flooding associated with standing consistent with the overall plan Strategy water. Poorly drained land will place and are deliverable within the plan period significant constraints on development. to enable the JLDP to meet the identified Bedrock at shallow depth will present housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. constraints on the construction and Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a 387 POLICY TAI14, T12 - design of the sites drainage. Bedrock near suite of policies and supporting text that & Mr Dave Eccles [269] Land near Cae Rhos, Object the surface limits the fall on drainage explains how development will be 402 Holyhead runs and the options for surface water managed within the areas of change, and management and disposal. Alternative the mechanisms by which the necessary brownfield sites with the advantages of infrastructure, services and facilities will be services access, no flooding, and green secured. This policy framework also space for amenities are in close includes the Councils’ requirement to proximity. Two large windfall sites mitigate potential impacts of development resulting from 2 agreed, school closures. in relation to enhancing and protecting the That the land at Cae Rhos not be natural and built environment, provision of considered as a site designated for sustainable transport, community facilities, housing or other development. environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation: It is considered that the

20 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary.

No Change Note the Support The site T12 will meet with all the POLICY TAI14, T12 - relevant issues raised by any / all council. 660 MrTANevin[244] Land near Cae Rhos, Support Recommendation Departments to support a housing Holyhead development. No Change Comments Noted * A water supply can be provided to serve The Councils will continue to engage with this site. DCWW at the planning application stage. * Potential developers need to be aware Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T12 - that the site is crossed by a sewer and Recommendation 1564 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Cae Rhos, Object protection measures in the form of No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Holyhead easement widths or a diversion of the matters raised. pipe would be required, which may impact upon the housing density No Change achievable on site. * There are isolated incidents offlooding in the public sewerage system that may Comments Noted need to be resolved to allow The Councils will continue to engage with development to proceed. Potential DCWW at the planning application stage. developers can either wait for DCWW to Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T12 - resolve the flooding, subject to funding Recommendation 1565 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Cae Rhos, Object being approved by our regulator Ofwat, No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Holyhead or progress the improvements through matters raised. the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of No Change the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA) may be required to determine the point

21 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan of connection to the public sewerage system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages. Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with DCWW at the planning application stage. * Holyhead Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T12 - Works (WwTW) can accommodate the Recommendation 1566 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Cae Rhos, Object foul flows from these proposed No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Holyhead development sites/growth figure. matters raised.

No Change

The AONB, SAC and SPA will all be Not Accepted adversely affected by the proximity and The representation seeks a deletion of a the amount of additional proposed site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing housing developments. the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an Pluvial flooding associated with standing extensive range of supporting evidence water. Poorly drained land will place that demonstrates the housing significant constraints on development. requirement over the JLDP period and has Bedrock at shallow depth will present also identified the necessary infrastructure constraints on the construction and required to support the development. The POLICY TAI14, T13 - design of the sites drainage. Bedrock near sites allocated within the plan are 389 MrDaveEccles[269] Land near Yr Ogof, Object the surface limits the fall on drainage consistent with the overall plan Strategy Holyhead runs and the options for surface water and are deliverable within the plan period management and disposal. Alternative to enable the JLDP to meet the identified brownfield sites with the advantages of housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. services access, no flooding, and green Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a space for amenities are in close suite of policies and supporting text that proximity. Two large windfall sites explains how development will be resulting from 2 agreed, school closures. managed within the areas of change, and That the land at Yr Ogof not be the mechanisms by which the necessary considered as a site designated for infrastructure, services and facilities will be

22 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan housing or other development. secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary.

No Change Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T13 - * A water supply can be provided to serve Recommendation 1567 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Yr Ogof, Object this site. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Holyhead matters raised.

No Change

* There are isolated incidents of flooding Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T13 - in the public sewerage system that may 1568 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Yr Ogof, Object need to be resolved to allow Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Holyhead development to proceed. Potential developers can either wait for DCWW to No Change

23 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan resolve the flooding, subject to funding being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA) may be required to determine the point of connection to the public sewerage system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages. Note the Support * Holyhead Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T13 - Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1569 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Yr Ogof, Object Recommendation foul flows from these proposed Griffiths ) [2680] Holyhead development sites/growth figure No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T14 - * A water supply can be provided to serve 1570 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Tyddyn Support Recommendation this site. Griffiths ) [2680] Bach Farm, Holyhead No Change * There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that may Comments Noted need to be resolved to allow The Councils will continue to engage with development to proceed. Potential DCWW at the planning application stage. developers can either wait for DCWW to Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T14 - resolve the flooding, subject to funding Recommendation 1571 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Tyddyn Object being approved by our regulator Ofwat, No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Bach Farm, Holyhead or progress the improvements through matters raised. the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of No Change the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA)

24 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan may be required to determine the point of connection to the public sewerage system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages. Note the Support * Holyhead Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T14 - Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1572 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Tyddyn Support Recommendation foul flows from these proposed Griffiths ) [2680] Bach Farm, Holyhead development sites/growth figure. No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T15 - * This site has planning permission as 1573 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Waunfawr Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Estate, Holyhead make. No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh * This site has planning permission as POLICY TAI14, T16 - 1574 Water (Mr Dewi Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Glan y Dŵr, Holyhead Griffiths ) [2680] make. No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T17 - * This site has planning permission as 1575 Water (Mr Dewi Cae Serri Road, Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Holyhead make No Change It was clearly the intention of the original Accepted plan to use the line of mean high water to As with all settlements that are located on define the boundary between the County the coast, the development boundary aims of Anglesey and the Statutory Harbour to follow the line of mean high water. Holyhead Marina Ltd 916 Map 3 - Holyhead Object Authority. This line was drafted based on [3101] an old Ordnance Survey maps. Recommendation Development and land reclamation have The Holyhead Marina has altered this line altered the line of mean high water and therefore to ensure the internal therefore left a key area of land (which consistency of the plan the development

25 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan has been developed) between the boundary should be amended to reflect development boundary and the harbour. this. This is inconsistent but disjointed permissions for development of Focussed Change NF116 Holyhead's waterfront on land surrounding the site. Amend the development boundary to include the land. Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan.

Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have Please include my land in the set out how the Council proposes to development plan. There is currently no manage the delivery of new development 947 W H Edwards [2256] Map 3 - Holyhead Object access to the land but my neighbour has including details on infrastructure planning. agreed that I can access the land via his The LDP therefore demonstrates how field. development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Other sites with less access issues are available in Holyhead.

26 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, I submitted some land in my ownership in Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Holyhead as a Candidate Site for relevant material factors, it is considered residential use (SY287) at Llaingoch. The that there is no demonstrable need to land is not suitable for agricultural use include the site within the Plan. and is only really useful for grazing horses. It is however ideally suited for Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, sustainable residential use. supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to The land has access both vehicular and manage the delivery of new development pedestrian form the existing highway including details on infrastructure planning. 952 Lisa Fowlie[2093] Map3-Holyhead Object network. It is served by the local bus The LDP therefore demonstrates how service and is within walking distance of development can be managed, phased and town centre, local shops and amenities, impacts mitigated. It is considered that the including primary and secondary schools. LDP meets the tests of soundness without The site is on the edge of the the need for a different approach such as a development boundary. Technically new settlement or the suggested there are means to sustainably drain alternative site to deliver the identified surface water and the main sewer is also housing and employment needs. accessible. The site forms a natural infill between Hirfron and the higher land to Recommendation the east. The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

27 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit * Change Policy TAI14 to include the Plan. Having considered the policy context, Holyhead Waterfront Site as a housing Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other allocation that is part of a mixed-use relevant material factors, it is considered scheme (site has extant planning consent that there is no demonstrable need to for 380 residential units, 7,645 m² of include the site within the Plan. commercial space and an 80 bed hotel). * The scheme has the potential to make a critical impact on the regeneration of Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Holyhead and Anglesey and to deliver the supporting text and documentation have "transformational change" sought in set out how the Council proposes to Policy CYF7. manage the delivery of new development * The development has a potentially including details on infrastructure planning. important role in meeting the objectives The LDP therefore demonstrates how Conygar Stenaline 1830 Map 3 - Holyhead Object of Policy TAI3 (providing key worker development can be managed, phased and Ltd [3373] accommodation associated with Wylfa impacts mitigated. It is considered that the Newydd). LDP meets the tests of soundness without * Allocation T16 'Glan y Dŵr' should be the need for a different approach such as a revised from 90 to 380 units to reflect the new settlement or the suggested residential units approved. The alternative site to deliver the identified commercial floorspace provision and the housing and employment needs. hotel proposal should be referenced in policies CYF1 & 7 and TWR2. The Recommendation development will make a significant The majority of the residential units contribution to achieving the key approved are located beyond the mean objectives which underpin Policies CYF1 high water mark and the allocation reflects and 7, as well as Housing Policies 1, 3 and the units with permission on land. We do 9. not propose to extend the housing allocation over the sea.

Bob - wylfa

28 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan

No Change

4) Llangefni

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with * Potential developers need to be aware DCWW at the planning application stage. that this site is crossed by a trunk water Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T18 - main and protection measures in the Recommendation 1576 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Ty Hen, Object form of easement widths or a diversion No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni of the pipe would be required, which may matters raised. impact upon the density achievable on site. No Change

* There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that will need to be resolved to allow development to proceed. Potential Comments Noted developers can either wait for DCWW to The Councils will continue to engage with resolve the flooding, subject to funding DCWW at the planning application stage. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T18 - or progress the improvements through Recommendation 1577 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Ty Hen, Object the sewerage requisition provisions of No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of matters raised. the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA) No Change may be required to determine the point of connection to the public sewerage system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages.

29 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted * Off-site sewers required to connect to The Councils will continue to engage with the public sewerage network can be DCWW at the planning application stage. provided through the sewer requisition Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T18 - scheme under Sections 98-101 of the Recommendation 1578 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Ty Hen, Object Water Industry Act 1991. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni * Llangefni Wastewater Treatment Works matters raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising No Change from this development area. Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with * Potential developers need to be aware DCWW at the planning application stage. that this site is crossed by water main Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T19 - and protection measures in the form of Recommendation 1579 Water (Mr Dewi Former Ysgol y Bont, Object easement widths or a diversion of the No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni pipe would be required, which may matters raised. impact upon the density achievable on site. No Change

* There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that will need to be resolved to allow Comments Noted development to proceed. Potential The Councils will continue to engage with developers can either wait for DCWW to DCWW at the planning application stage. resolve the flooding, subject to funding Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T19 - being approved by our regulator Ofwat, Recommendation 1580 Water (Mr Dewi Former Ysgol y Bont, Object or progress the improvements through No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni the sewerage requisition provisions of matters raised. the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. No Change A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA) may be required to determine the point of connection to the public sewerage

30 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages. Comments Noted * Off-site sewers required to connect to The Councils will continue to engage with the public sewerage network can be DCWW at the planning application stage. provided through the sewer requisition Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T19 - scheme under Sections 98-101 of the Recommendation 1581 Water (Mr Dewi Former Ysgol y Bont, Object Water Industry Act 1991 No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni * Llangefni Wastewater Treatment Works matters raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising No Change from this development area Not Accepted It is considered that the JLDP identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate The allocation of housing sites to the housing land in the area and the proposed north of Llangefni represents a logical change is not considered required to extension to the urban area, however, ensure the soundness of the plan. the proposed development boundary is drawn too restrictively and the site Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, allocations are of insufficient size to supporting text and documentation have provide the numbers of new dwellings set out how the Council proposes to Mr B Pritchard POLICY TAI14, T20 - required in the plan period. Further land 498 Object manage the delivery of new development [2951] Ty'n Coed, Llangefni is available in this location and a revised including details on infrastructure planning. development boundary would facilitate The LDP therefore demonstrates how appropriate new housing development. development can be managed, phased and Specifically land identified as site SP159 impacts mitigated. It is considered that the on the Candidate Site register is available LDP meets the tests of soundness without to cater for new housing and this would the need for a different approach such as a form a logical extension of the urban new settlement or the suggested area. alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

31 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other It is considered that there is an over- relevant material factors, it is considered reliance on windfall sites within the LDP. that there is no demonstrable need to It is not considered that there is sufficient include the site within the Plan. landbank within the development boundary to accommodate the identified Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, windfall needed within the centre of supporting text and documentation have Llangefni. We wish to propose an set out how the Council proposes to extension to the allocated site (T20) land manage the delivery of new development Aporis Trading LLP POLICY TAI14, T20 - adjacent to Tyn Coed to be included including details on infrastructure planning. 1273 Object [3151] Ty'n Coed, Llangefni within the development boundary for The LDP therefore demonstrates how allocation of housing to ensure that the development can be managed, phased and level of housing is maintained over the impacts mitigated. It is considered that the plan period. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without extension to the allocated site would the need for a different approach such as a form a logical and reasonable addition new settlement or the suggested with well-defined boundaries allowing for alternative site to deliver the identified more comprehensive and sustainable housing and employment needs. development. Recommendation The inclusion of the alternative site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

32 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T20 - * A water supply can be provided to serve 1582 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Ty'n Coed, Llangefni this site. Griffiths ) [2680] No Change * There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that will need to be resolved to allow development to proceed. Potential Comments Noted developers can either wait for DCWW to The Councils will continue to engage with resolve the flooding, subject to funding DCWW at the planning application stage. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, Dwr Cymru Welsh or progress the improvements through POLICY TAI14, T20 - Recommendation 1583 Water (Mr Dewi Object the sewerage requisition provisions of Ty'n Coed, Llangefni No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of matters raised. the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA) No Change may be required to determine the point of connection to the public sewerage system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages. Comments Noted * Off-site sewers required to connect to The Councils will continue to engage with the public sewerage network can be DCWW at the planning application stage. provided through the sewer requisition Dwr Cymru Welsh scheme under Sections 98-101 of the POLICY TAI14, T20 - Recommendation 1584 Water (Mr Dewi Object Water Industry Act 1991. Ty'n Coed, Llangefni No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] * Llangefni Wastewater Treatment Works matters raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising No Change from this development area. 1585 Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T21 - Support * A water supply can be provided to serve Note the Support

33 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Water (Mr Dewi Land near Ysgol y this site. Griffiths ) [2680] Graig, Llangefni Recommendation

No Change * There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that will need to be resolved to allow development to proceed. Potential Comments Noted developers can either wait for DCWW to The Councils will continue to engage with resolve the flooding, subject to funding DCWW at the planning application stage. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T21 - or progress the improvements through Recommendation 1586 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Ysgol y Object the sewerage requisition provisions of No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Graig, Llangefni the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of matters raised. the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA) No Change may be required to determine the point of connection to the public sewerage system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages. Comments Noted * Off-site sewers required to connect to The Councils will continue to engage with the public sewerage network can be DCWW at the planning application stage. provided through the sewer requisition Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T21 - scheme under Sections 98-101 of the Recommendation 1587 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Ysgol y Object Water Industry Act 1991. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Graig, Llangefni * Llangefni Wastewater Treatment Works matters raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising No Change from this development area. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T22 - * Potential developers need to be aware Comments Noted 1588 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Bro Tudur, Object that this site is crossed by a water main The Councils will continue to engage with Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni and protection measures in the form of DCWW at the planning application stage.

34 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan easement widths or a diversion of the pipe would be required, which may Recommendation impact upon the density achievable on No change is required to address the site. matters raised.

No Change

* There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that will need to be resolved to allow development to proceed. Potential Comments Noted developers can either wait for DCWW to The Councils will continue to engage with resolve the flooding, subject to funding DCWW at the planning application stage. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T22 - or progress the improvements through Recommendation 1589 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Bro Tudur, Object the sewerage requisition provisions of No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of matters raised. the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA) No Change may be required to determine the point of connection to the public sewerage system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages. Comments Noted * Off-site sewers would be required to The Councils will continue to engage with connect to the public sewerage network. DCWW at the planning application stage. These can be provided through the sewer Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T22 - requisition scheme under Sections 98- Recommendation 1590 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Bro Tudur, Object 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991 No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llangefni * Llangefni Wastewater Treatment Works matters raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising No Change from this development area.

35 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T23 - * A water supply can be provided to serve 1591 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Coleg Support Recommendation this site. Griffiths ) [2680] Menai, Llangefni No Change * There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that will need to be resolved to allow development to proceed. Potential Comments Noted developers can either wait for DCWW to The Councils will continue to engage with resolve the flooding, subject to funding DCWW at the planning application stage. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T23 - or progress the improvements through Recommendation 1592 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Coleg Object the sewerage requisition provisions of No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Menai, Llangefni the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of matters raised. the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. A hydraulic modelling assessment (HMA) No Change may be required to determine the point of connection to the public sewerage system and potential developers would be expected to fund investigations during pre-planning stages. Comments Noted * Off-site sewers required to connect to The Councils will continue to engage with the public sewerage network can be DCWW at the planning application stage. provided through the sewer requisition Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T23 - scheme under Sections 98-101 of the Recommendation 1593 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Coleg Object Water Industry Act 1991. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Menai, Llangefni * Llangefni Wastewater Treatment Works matters raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising No Change from this development area. Watkin Jones (Mr Land at Tan y Capel, Llangefni. The above Not Accepted 1000 Map 4 - Llangefni Object Stuart Hardy) [3159] information, which is supplemented by a The representation seeks the inclusion of a

36 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan comprehensive sustainability appraisal of new site not included within the Deposit the site, indicates that the site is suitable Plan. Having considered the policy context, for housing and should be included as a Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other candidate/allocated site within the JLDP. relevant material factors, it is considered The site is accessible, available, that there is no demonstrable need to deliverable and developable and can help include the site within the Plan. Anglesey/Gwynedd meet its housing requirements throughout the plan Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, period. It is therefore considered to be supporting text and documentation have appropriate to be brought forward due to set out how the Council proposes to its central location in Llangefni, which is manage the delivery of new development recognised within the JLDP as priority including details on infrastructure planning. area for development. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Land adj Fron Farm, Llangefni. The above Not Accepted information, which is supplemented by a The representation seeks the inclusion of a comprehensive sustainability appraisal of new site not included within the Deposit Watkin Jones (Mr 1001 Map 4 - Llangefni Object the site, indicates that the site is suitable Plan. Having considered the policy context, Stuart Hardy) [3159] for housing and should be included as a Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other candidate/allocated site within the JLDP. relevant material factors, it is considered The site is accessible, available, that there is no demonstrable need to

37 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan deliverable and developable and can help include the site within the Plan. Anglesey/Gwynedd meet its housing requirements throughout the plan Issues raised during the Candidate Site period. It is therefore considered to be Assessment process highlighted the appropriate to be brought forward due to inadequate visibility at the junction with its central location in Llangefni, which is the B5109 and capacity of the road through recognised within the JLDP as a priority the estate. area for development. Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted Land at Gwernhefin, Llangefni. My wish is The representation seeks the inclusion of a Rhian Williams to see land at Gwernhefin included in the new site not included within the Deposit 1005 Map 4 - Llangefni Object [2303] deposit plan for the reasons noted in the Plan. Having considered the policy context, enclosed notes. Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered

38 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan.

Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the alternative site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Land at Caeau Bodelis Fields should be 1006 Alyn Nicholls[3084] Map4-Llangefni Object relevant material factors, it is considered allocated for housing development. that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan.

Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have

39 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

5) Blaenau Ffestiniog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan To designate Y Ddôl, the old site of the Not Accepted Rugby Club, for housing. It is very The representation seeks a deletion of a important to note that this site lies on site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing floodplain. The maps that were created the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an Cyngor Tref POLICY TAI14, T24 - by the old Environmental Agency about extensive range of supporting evidence 420 Ffestiniog (Mrs Ann Former Playing Fields, Object flood risks confirm this. Therefore, if that demonstrates the housing Coxon) [2940] Blaenau Ffestiniog houses are built on that site, they would requirement over the JLDP period and has have to be specially designed, perhaps also identified the necessary infrastructure even raised on stilts. Building normal required to support the development. The houses would mean forcing future sites allocated within the plan are residents to suffer floods time after time. consistent with the overall plan Strategy

40 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan and are deliverable within the plan period to enable the JLDP to meet the identified housing needs of the plan area up to 2026.

Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a suite of policies and supporting text that explains how development will be managed within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary.

No Change * A water supply can be provided toserve Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T24 - this site. 1594 Water (Mr Dewi Former Playing Fields, Support * The public sewerage network can Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Blaenau Ffestiniog accept the potential foul flows from the proposed development site. No Change

41 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Blaenau Ffestiniog Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising from this development area. Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with * Potential developers need to be aware DCWW at the planning application stage. that this site is crossed by water main Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T25 - and protection measures in the form of Recommendation 1595 Water (Mr Dewi Land at Congl y Wal, Object easement widths or a diversion of the No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Blaenau Ffestiniog pipe would be required, which may matters raised. impact upon the density achievable on site. No Change

* The foul flows would lead to Tanrhos Manod Pumping Station (SPS) and an assessment of this SPS may be needed to establish whether the flows can be accommodated or whether Comment Noted improvements to the SPS will be required to allow development to proceed. Recommendation Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T25 - Should off-site sewers be required these The Councils will continue to have ongoing 1596 Water (Mr Dewi Land at Congl y Wal, Object can be provided through the sewer discussions with DCWW on the matters Griffiths ) [2680] Blaenau Ffestiniog requisition scheme under Sections 98- raised. 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. * Blaenau Ffestiniog Wastewater No Change Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising from this development area. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY CYF1, C18 - * Our local water networkshould be Note the Support 1636 Water (Mr Dewi Tanygrisiau Site, Support sufficient to provide the domestic water Griffiths ) [2680] Blaenau Ffestiniog demands required to serve this Recommendation

42 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan development area. * The public sewerage network can No Change accept the domestic foul flows arising from this development area. * Blaenau Ffestiniog Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising from this development area Accepted This brownfield site relates to the urban Due to significant physical constraints in fabric of the settlement rather than the Blaenau Ffestiniog there was a difficulty of adjoining open countryside and is well identifying suitable sites to allocate for located both in terms of access to local housing. To combat this the Strategy services and facilities and public proposes a higher level brownfield land and transport services. Its inclusion within the buildings within the settlement compared settlement boundary of Blaenau to other settlements. Ffestiniog would represent a logical rounding off of the settlement, where it Recommendation Mrs Mair Jones Map 5 - Blaenau will be well placed to help contribute 979 Object The inclusion of the site within the [3144] Ffestiniog towards the required indicative windfall development boundary would: provide provision of housing units. Any such sufficient flexibility within the Plan to contributions are important because as achieve the indicative windfall figure for the Plan notes this required level of Blaenau Ffestiniog; align with the Plan’s provision is a challenge to achieve due to spatial strategy; and ensure the internal the significant physical constraints the consistency of the Plan. settlement experiences. Redrafting of the development boundary Focussed Changed NF117 for Blaenau Ffestiniog indicated on Inset Map 5 to include this site.

6) Caernarfon

43 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and recommendations ID to Plan *A water supply can be provided to serve this site. Comments Noted * The public sewerage network can The Councils will continue to engage with accept the potential foul flows from the DCWW at the planning application stage. proposed development site. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T26 - * The proposed growth being promoted Recommendation 1597 Water (Mr Dewi Former Hendre Object for this settlement would require No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] School, Caernarfon improvements at Caernarfon Wastewater matters raised. Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset No Change Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with DCWW at the planning application stage. POLICY TAI14, T27 - Dwr Cymru Welsh Land to the rear of * A water supply can be provided to serve Recommendation 1598 Water (Mr Dewi Object Maes Gwynedd, this site No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Caernarfon matters raised.

No Change

* Off-site sewers would be required to connect to the public sewerage network. Comments Noted These can be provided through the sewer The Councils will continue to engage with requisition scheme under Sections 98- DCWW at the planning application stage. POLICY TAI14, T27 - 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. Dwr Cymru Welsh Land to the rear of There are isolated incidents of flooding in Recommendation 1599 Water (Mr Dewi Object Maes Gwynedd, the public sewerage system that may No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Caernarfon need to be resolved to allow matters raised. development to proceed. Potential developers can either wait for DCWW to No Change resolve the flooding, subject to funding being approved by our regulator Ofwat,

44 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and recommendations ID to Plan or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with * The proposed growth being promoted DCWW at the planning application stage. for this settlement would require POLICY TAI14, T27 - Dwr Cymru Welsh improvements at Caernarfon Wastewater Land to the rear of Recommendation 1600 Water (Mr Dewi Object Treatment Works (WwTW) which would Maes Gwynedd, No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] need to be funded through our Asset Caernarfon matters raised. Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T28 - * This site has planning permission as 1601 Water (Mr Dewi Cae Phillips Road, Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Caernarfon make. No Change To allocate Gallt y Sill/Tyddyn Pandy Not Accepted (SP632), Caernarfon for Residential Uses. The representation seeks the inclusion of a The submission provides further new site not included within the Deposit information and justification as to why Plan. Having considered the policy context, the site should be allocated within the Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Joint Local Development Plan. The site relevant material factors, it is considered Watkin Jones & Son has been assessed in accordance with the that there is no demonstrable need to 988 (Mr Stuart Hardy) Map6-Caernarfon Object Council's site assessment methodology include the site within the Plan. [3150] (Topic Papers 1 & 1A), and Sustainability Appraisal methodology, set out in the Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Deposit SA Report. The letter and supporting text and documentation have submitted assessment demonstrates that set out how the Council proposes to the subject site is justified, effective, manage the delivery of new development deliverable, viable and consistent with including details on infrastructure planning. Policy, and therefore justify inclusion in The LDP therefore demonstrates how

45 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and recommendations ID to Plan the final Local Development Plan. development can be managed, phased and Support including land adjoining Tyddyn impacts mitigated. It is considered that the Pandy (SP586), for housing development. LDP meets the tests of soundness without The land is based within the proposed the need for a different approach such as a line of the new Caernarfon bypass. It is new settlement or the suggested immediately adjacent to housing alternative site to deliver the identified development T28and would not be housing and employment needs. protruding into nearby countryside. Not enough land has been allocated for Recommendation Mr George Denham housing in Caernarfon to compare with The inclusion of the site is therefore not 989 Map6-Caernarfon Object [34] Holyhead and smaller towns such as considered necessary to ensure the Llangefni and Blaenau Ffestiniog. The vast soundness of the JLDP. majority of land allocated within the development boundary for housing in No Change Caernarfon is Council owned land and there are not many privately owned land. The inclusion of the said land would have a positive impact on the people, area and economy of Caernarfon. It is considered that there is an over- Not Accepted reliance on windfall sites within the Local The representation seeks the inclusion of a Development Plan. It is not considered new site not included within the Deposit that there is sufficient landbank within Plan. Having considered the policy context, the development boundary to Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other accommodate the identified windfall relevant material factors, it is considered need within the centre of Caernarfon. We that there is no demonstrable need to Aporis Trading LLP 990 Map6-Caernarfon Object wish to propose a site adjacent to Glan include the site within the Plan. [3151] Seiont (identified as site SP606 on the candidate site register) to be included Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, within the development boundary of supporting text and documentation have Caernarfon for allocation of housing to set out how the Council proposes to ensure that the level of housing is manage the delivery of new development maintained over the plan period. including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how

46 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and recommendations ID to Plan We wish to seek the following changes: development can be managed, phased and 1. Additional land should be allocated impacts mitigated. It is considered that the within the Urban Service Centre of LDP meets the tests of soundness without Caernarfon for housing to the need for a different approach such as a accommodate the identified housing new settlement or the suggested need to ensure that the level of housing alternative site to deliver the identified is maintained over the housing and employment needs. plan period. 2. The site adjacent to Glan Seiont should Recommendation be included within the development The inclusion of the site is therefore not boundary of Caernarfon considered necessary to ensure the and allocated for housing. soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

7) Porthmadog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type ID to Plan Include a plot of land, namely Moelwyn Not Accepted Dairy, Porthmadog Plot OS.56390101 Although Porthmadog is defended against within the Plan based on the fact that it flooding, large parts of the settlement are conforms with Policies TAI10 and TAI14. categorised as being within flood zone C1. 1. The plot of land should be included It is the Councils’ opinion that no suitable within the town boundary. It conforms alternative site can be found outside the Mr Bryan Rees Jones with the criteria of Policy TAI10 for flood risk area therefore it has been 101 Map7-Porthmadog Object [2737] Affordable Housing. 2. Policy TAI14 states necessary to identify alternative locations a growth level of 123 for Porthmadog. 3. in the settlement’s catchment area to assist It is intended to use the plot entirely for in meeting the requirement for housing. Affordable Housing. It is land that was used to prepare and distribute milk and Suitable sites have been found in permission has been given for a Rescue Penrhyndeudraeth and Criccieth to help Team Centre. 4. All public services are meet Porthmadog’s housing requirement.

47 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type ID to Plan available Recommendation No robust evidence was submitted which would justify amending the Deposit Plan to ensure the Plan’s soundness.

No Change Not Accepted Although Porthmadog is defended against flooding, large parts of the settlement are categorised as being within flood zone C1. It is the Councils’ opinion that no suitable Include additional land to develop alternative site can be found outside the housing (affordable and for the market) flood risk area therefore it has been on Moelwyn Dairy land. Map reference necessary to identify alternative locations O.S. SH5639 and SH5539. As a great deal in the settlement’s catchment area to assist of the town is affected by flood risk, it is in meeting the requirement for housing. Mr Llywelyn Rhys 137 Map7-Porthmadog Object not possible to serve the projected [2770] growth level (see Topic Paper 5, Table 16, Suitable sites have been found in page 48). Including the plot would Penrhyndeudraeth and Criccieth to help conform to the criteria of Policies TAI10 meet Porthmadog’s housing requirement. and TAI14. All public services are available for the site. Recommendation No robust evidence was submitted which would justify amending the Deposit Plan to ensure the Plan’s soundness.

No Change I feel that the 20 acresof land I own Not Accepted should be included in the boundaries of Although Porthmadog is defended against Mr Alun Evans what is deemed to be land that can be flooding, large parts of the settlement are 274 Map7-Porthmadog Object [2854] part of this policy i.e. Affordable Housing, categorised as being within flood zone C1. the land can be used to build one or two It is the Councils’ opinion that no suitable houses, the remainder of the land has alternative site can be found outside the

48 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type ID to Plan much many wildlife flood risk area therefore it has been benefits and can accordingly be necessary to identify alternative locations developed into a nature reserve or in the settlement’s catchment area to assist maintained to preserve the environment. in meeting the requirement for housing. The land in question is as follows SH5637 and SH5638 Borth y Gest, Suitable sites have been found in Porthmadog. Penrhyndeudraeth and Criccieth to help meet Porthmadog’s housing requirement.

Recommendation No robust evidence was submitted which would justify amending the Deposit Plan to ensure the Plan’s soundness.

No Change Not Accepted The current development plant outline Although Porthmadog is defended against for Porthmadog is limited to the town flooding, large parts of the settlement are centre, and as it stands it will not categorised as being within flood zone C1. sufficiently meet the housing shortage It is the Councils’ opinion that no suitable problem in the town. This is mainly due alternative site can be found outside the to insufficient land within the LDP outline flood risk area therefore it has been to build new housing. Housing shortages necessary to identify alternative locations in the town are regularly reported in the in the settlement’s catchment area to assist Mrs Elen Williams 295 Map7-Porthmadog Object local press and therefore other suitable in meeting the requirement for housing. [2874] sustainable options and locations need to be considered. In its current state the Suitable sites have been found in LDP boundary for Porthmadog is not Penrhyndeudraeth and Criccieth to help future proof, and doesn't allow for meet Porthmadog’s housing requirement. flexibility to meet potential future housing demands. Amend the Recommendation development boundary to include Cae No robust evidence was submitted which Brics near Maes Gerddi. would justify amending the Deposit Plan to ensure the Plan’s soundness.

49 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type ID to Plan

No Change Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan The Company considers that the area identifies sufficient, deliverable and covered should a) be shown on the appropriate housing and employment land Proposals Map (as indicated in the in the area and the proposed change is not policy), and b) be extended to include all considered required to ensure the Welsh Highland of the land covered by Candidate Site soundness of the plan. 376 Railway (Mr Graham MAP7-Porthmadog Object submission ref: SP870 and surrounding Farr) [254] area, including open land on both sides of Recommendation the new A487(T) bypass road (copies of Amending the development boundary is this submission and earlier related not considered necessary to ensure the Candidate Site submission ref: SP552 soundness of the Plan. attached). No Change Our concerns reference Bryn Awel, Hill, Street, Porthmadog LL49 9BD, and at present the development boundary doesn't reflect the established use of the Not Accepted land which forms part of the garden at Development boundaries are drawn around Bryn Awel. the built up form of settlements and where As on the Land Registry copy of the plan possible follow physical features on the (CYM78816), the property's boundary has ground and not land ownership. Arwel Williams changed. The extension of the property's 975 Map7-Porthmadog Object [3139] land may provide opportunity in the Recommendation future for new development e.g. a granny Amending the development boundary is flat. The land is accessible and full not considered necessary to ensure the amenities are available. soundness of the Plan. Amend the development boundary so that it reflects the new boundary of Bryn No Change Awel (see attached map) Include the site shown within the development boundary.

50 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type ID to Plan Development boundary near Penbryn Not Accepted Cottage has been shown incorrectly. The Development boundaries are drawn around line on the Proposal Map does not follow the built up form of settlements and where the boundary of the property and it possible follow physical features on the excludes the garden area to the north ground and not land ownership. and south. The area to the south has always been part of the back garden of Recommendation Penybryn Cottage and the area to the Amending the development boundary is Mrs Pamela Beer north is a parking area for the property. I not considered necessary to ensure the 976 Map7-Porthmadog Object [266] believe the development boundary soundness of the Plan. should be redrawn to include the whole of the cottage grounds (see attached No Change plans). I have copies of the old O.S. Maps if required to support the above together with aerial photographs. Redraw Development Boundary as per submitted plans for the reasons explained in 2c. 1. Land is outside flood risk Not Accepted 2. Within walking distance of schools, Although Porthmadog is defended against workplaces and public services such as flooding, large parts of the settlement are libraries, food shop businesses, 'blue categorised as being within flood zone C1. lights' stations. It is the Councils’ opinion that no suitable 3. There are already many houses nearby. alternative site can be found outside the 4. The need for affordable housing to flood risk area therefore it has been Mrs Haf Madoc keep young people (Welsh speaking) in necessary to identify alternative locations 1044 Map7-Porthmadog Object Wilson [263] the area. in the settlement’s catchment area to assist in meeting the requirement for housing. I would like to see the boundaries of Porthmadog extended to include land at Suitable sites have been found in Penclogwyn in case the town loses its Penrhyndeudraeth and Criccieth to help new settlement building rights to meet Porthmadog’s housing requirement. Penrhyndeudraeth and Criccieth due to flooding problems. Recommendation

51 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type ID to Plan No robust evidence wassubmitted which would justify amending the Deposit Plan to ensure the Plan’s soundness.

No Change

8) Pwllheli

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan No evidence of local housing need that Not Accepted POLICY TAI14, T29 - can justify the number that has been The representation seeks a deletion of a Dr Richard Roberts 411 Land near Lôn Object designated. Building so many houses site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing [2938] Caernarfon, Pwllheli would have a detrimental impact on the the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an Welsh language. extensive range of supporting evidence We object to developing this green land that demonstrates the housing for environmental, landscape and visual requirement over the JLDP period and has reasons (C1 (soundness tests). also identified the necessary infrastructure required to support the development. The Approving development here would be sites allocated within the plan are unacceptable as it would be linear and consistent with the overall plan Strategy would adjoin the highway, it is green and are deliverable within the plan period POLICY TAI14, T29 - land and indigenous trees and bushes to enable the JLDP to meet the identified 1288 Mr Iwan Edgar [251] Land near Lôn Object would be lost. housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. Caernarfon, Pwllheli It is also in a narrow corridor with steep Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a sides and used to be a landscape suite of policies and supporting text that conservation area. Any development explains how development will be managed would involve excavation and would ruin within the areas of change, and the a gateway of beautiful landscape into the mechanisms by which the necessary town. infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also

52 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan A further consideration is that the includes the Councils’ requirement to community of Pwllheli does not require mitigate potential impacts of development this additional number of houses. in relation to enhancing and protecting the Need to delete for the following reasons: natural and built environment, provision of Cyngor Tref Pwllheli POLICY TAI14, T29 - sustainable transport, community facilities, 1346 (Mr Robin W Land near Lôn Object 1. Sufficient settlement provision. environmental assets and the careful Hughes) [1235] Caernarfon, Pwllheli 2. Ecological reasons. management of development in We object to the allocation for housing of environmentally sensitive areas or rural site T29 on land near the Caernarfon locations. Council for the Road on grounds of unacceptable ribbon POLICY TAI14, T29 - Protection of Rural development, damaging landscape Recommendation 1347 Land near Lôn Object Wales (Mr Noel impact and significant traffic and access It is considered that the JLDP meets the Caernarfon, Pwllheli Davey) [1169] issues. We think alternative sites could be tests of soundness without the need for the identified in other parts of Pwllheli and in removal of the site. Therefore, the accessible satellite centres such as Y Ffôr. proposed change is not considered 1. Inhospitable combination of necessary. North South Facing Valley and polluting main road. No Change 2. Planning housing for today needs attached indoor amenities - sports etc. POLICY TAI14, T29 - 3. Looking ahead: Ribbon development 1411 Julie O'Neil [3350] Land near Lôn Object will not suffice; still need a proper new Caernarfon, Pwllheli village. 4. The "investment" homes question. 5. Widening/straightening of the main road is necessary re. even less housing & amenities space. Dismayed at seeing the suggestion to replace land that was to be used for an POLICY TAI14, T29 - industrial site was now to be included for 1427 Brian Jones [2173] Land near Lôn Object housing and a considerable amount of Caernarfon, Pwllheli land added as well. I thought that the Council had been forward thinking with the allocation of this land for industrial

53 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan use as there is a good chance that the site of the existing industrial estate will be lost with the upcoming rising tides. Surely there are other candidates who have put up land for housing. It would be possible to build a road from this land to gain access to land above it which would be just as suitable for housing. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. Comments Noted * There are isolated incidents of flooding The Councils will continue to engage with in the public sewerage system that may DCWW at the planning application stage. need to be resolved to allow Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T29 - development to proceed. Potential Recommendation 1602 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Lôn Object developers can either wait for DCWW to No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Caernarfon, Pwllheli resolve the flooding, subject to funding matters raised. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through No Change the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. * A hydraulic modelling assessment Comments Noted (HMA) may be required to determine the The Councils will continue to engage with point of connection to the public DCWW at the planning application stage. sewerage system and potential Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T29 - developers would be expected to fund Recommendation 1603 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Lôn Object investigations during pre-planning stages. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Caernarfon, Pwllheli * Pwllheli Wastewater Treatment Works matters raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure No Change allocated for this catchment area. The dangerous hill Salem Terrace/Allt Not Accepted Mr Tony Elliott POLICY TAI14, T30 - 84 Object Salem (the only access between the The representation seeks a deletion of a [2717] Deiniol Field, Pwllheli proposed developments and Pwllheli site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing

54 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan town centre) would become even more the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an dangerous through increased use, and extensive range of supporting evidence the lack of pavements and lack of room that demonstrates the housing to build any would put pedestrians at requirement over the JLDP period and has particular risk. also identified the necessary infrastructure required to support the development. The The present infrastructure is inadequate sites allocated within the plan are for the proposed developments and consistent with the overall plan Strategy changing it would be intrusive and alter and are deliverable within the plan period the character of the area. to enable the JLDP to meet the identified housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. The proposed developments are on a scale that is too big for Penrallt and Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a would involve encroachment on suite of policies and supporting text that surrounding countryside and harm the explains how development will be managed environment. within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary The hockey field should be used for infrastructure, services and facilities will be educational, recreational and community secured. This policy framework also purposes. includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development Removal of the sites T30 and T31 from in relation to enhancing and protecting the the proposed development plan and natural and built environment, provision of policy. sustainable transport, community facilities, Allt Salem is not capable of taking the environmental assets and the careful much increased capacity created by the management of development in proposed developments T30 and T31, environmentally sensitive areas or rural because of the lack of service facilities locations. POLICY TAI14, T30 - and infrastructure, and automatic 208 DerekSoane[2783] Object Deiniol Field, Pwllheli increase of traffic on an already restricted Recommendation access. It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the Alternative sites for housing removal of the site. Therefore, the developments should be investigated proposed change is not considered

55 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan where facilities are easier. necessary. No evidence of local need for housing Dr Richard Roberts POLICY TAI14, T30 - which justifies the number allocated. No Change 413 Object [2938] Deiniol Field, Pwllheli Adverse impact upon the Welsh language from building so many. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. Comments Noted * There are isolated incidents of flooding The Councils will continue to engage with in the public sewerage system that will DCWW at the planning application stage. need to be resolved to allow Dwr Cymru Welsh development to proceed. Potential POLICY TAI14, T30 - Recommendation 1604 Water (Mr Dewi Object developers can either wait for DCWW to Deiniol Field, Pwllheli No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] resolve the flooding, subject to funding matters raised. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through No Change the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. * Off-site sewers would be required to Comment Noted connect to the public sewerage network. These can be provided through the sewer Recommendation Dwr Cymru Welsh requisition scheme under Sections 98- POLICY TAI14, T30 - The Councils will continue to have ongoing 1605 Water (Mr Dewi Object 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. Deiniol Field, Pwllheli discussions with DCWW on the matters Griffiths ) [2680] * Pwllheli Wastewater Treatment Works raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure No Change allocated for this catchment area Not Accepted The representation seeks a deletion of a No evidence for local need to justify the POLICY TAI14, T31 - site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing Dr Richard Roberts number of houses proposed. Building so 415 Former Hockey Field, Object the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an [2938] many houses will have a detrimental Pwllheli extensive range of supporting evidence effect on the Welsh language. that demonstrates the housing requirement over the JLDP period and has

56 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan also identified the necessary infrastructure required to support the development. The sites allocated within the plan are consistent with the overall plan Strategy and are deliverable within the plan period to enable the JLDP to meet the identified housing needs of the plan area up to 2026.

Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a suite of policies and supporting text that explains how development will be managed within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary.

No Change 1606 Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T31 - Object * A water supply can be provided to serve Comments Noted

57 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Water (Mr Dewi Former Hockey Field, this site. The Councils will continue toengage with Griffiths ) [2680] Pwllheli * There are isolated incidents of flooding DCWW at the planning application stage. in the public sewerage system that will need to be resolved to allow Recommendation development to proceed. Potential No change is required to address the developers can either wait for DCWW to matters raised. resolve the flooding, subject to funding being approved by our regulator Ofwat, No Change or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Comments Noted * Off-site sewers would be required to The Councils will continue to engage with connect to the public sewerage network. DCWW at the planning application stage. These can be provided through the sewer Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI14, T31 - requisition scheme under Sections 98- Recommendation 1607 Water (Mr Dewi Former Hockey Field, Object 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Pwllheli * Pwllheli Wastewater Treatment Works matters raised. (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure No Change allocated for this catchment area. Allt Salem is not capable of taking the Not Accepted much increased capacity created by the The representation seeks a deletion of a proposed developments T30 and T31, site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing because of the lack of service facilities the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an POLICY TAI14, T31 - and infrastructure, and automatic extensive range of supporting evidence 1831 Derek Soane [2783] Former Hockey Field, Object increase of traffic on an already restricted that demonstrates the housing Pwllheli access. requirement over the JLDP period and has also identified the necessary infrastructure Alternative sites for housing required to support the development. The developments should be investigated sites allocated within the plan are where facilities are easier. consistent with the overall plan Strategy 1832 Mr Tony Elliott POLICY TAI14, T31 - Object The dangerous hill Salem Terrace/Allt and are deliverable within the plan period

58 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan [2717] Former Hockey Field, Salem (the only access between the to enable the JLDP to meet the identified Pwllheli proposed developments and Pwllheli housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. town centre) would become even more dangerous through increased use, and Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a the lack of pavements and lack of room suite of policies and supporting text that to build any would put pedestrians at explains how development will be managed particular risk. within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary The present infrastructure is inadequate infrastructure, services and facilities will be for the proposed developments and secured. This policy framework also changing it would be intrusive and alter includes the Councils’ requirement to the character of the area. mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the The proposed developments are on a natural and built environment, provision of scale that is too big for Penrallt and sustainable transport, community facilities, would involve encroachment on environmental assets and the careful surrounding countryside and harm the management of development in environment. environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations. The hockey field should be used for educational, recreational and community Recommendation purposes. It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the Removal of the sites T30 and T31 from removal of the site. Therefore, the the proposed development plan and proposed change is not considered policy. necessary.

No Change The Plan seeks land for 291 houses in Accepted Pwllheli. 110 of these will be windfall - Objectors have drawn attention to Mr Gwyn Llewelyn how realistic is this? There isn't enough legitimate issues relating to allocation T29’s 994 Map 8 - Pwllheli Object Jones [77] land to deliver these numbers. The ability to deliver the number of units set "Assessing Pwllheli's development land out in Policy TAI14 (the presence of a potential" report shows that stream and trees on part of the site, and

59 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan consideration has been given to land in the site’s topography and shape means that the Denio area, but it was not brought to it is unlikely that the site will deliver 30 the plan due to development costs, dwellings per hectare). On this premise the without giving consideration to smaller Unit has reviewed objections relating to developments. Gwyn Jones owns the amendments to the development boundary land, he was brought up there and he to determine whether minor amendments farms the land. Positive opinion has been could be made to ensure sufficient received from the Highways Department flexibility within the Plan to deliver the (see the enclosed letter). The NFU and Plan’s strategy and objectives. the police also support Gwyn Jones building a house on the land. On this Recommendation basis, we believe that the land displayed No issues were raised about this site during on the map is suitable for development. the plan preparation process and forms a Change the development boundary to reasonable extension to the existing built include the Ysgubor Wen section of land form. Amend the development boundary to for up to four houses (see enclosed map). include the site to help towards achieving the indicative figure for the settlement.

Focussed Change NF118 The Plan's allocation of housing land in Not Accepted Pwllheli is inadequate in terms of its The representation seeks the inclusion of a proportion of the 55% target for delivery new site not included within the Deposit in the Primary Settlements and the Plan. Having considered the policy context, town's continued role as an Urban Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Service Centre. The over-dependence of relevant material factors, it is considered the proposed housing on a single large that there is no demonstrable need to 1049 Owen Lloyd[3189] Map8-Pwllheli Object site (T29) will effectively create an urban include the site within the Plan. extension of ribbon development on "greenfield" land with poor connectivity Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting to the town centre. The whole of text and documentation have set out how Candidate Site SP765 is excluded from the Council proposes to manage the the Proposals Map, despite the delivery of new development including opportunity to provide housing on details on infrastructure planning. The LDP "brownfield" land on the edge of town therefore demonstrates how development

60 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan centre - thereby providing a more can be managed, phased and impacts sustainable alternative. mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the In the light of the above representations, need for a different approach such as a the changes required would be an new settlement or the suggested amendment of the Pwllheli development alternative site to deliver the identified boundary to include 10-15 acres of land housing and employment needs. along and adjacent to the Ala Road frontage. Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Support the inclusion of SP858 Penmaen Not Accepted Estate Land in the Candidate Site The representation seeks the inclusion of a Register. There are comments in the new site not included within the Deposit initial responses to the application that Plan. Having considered the policy context, the main drawback to its inclusion are Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other associated with access issues relevant material factors, it is considered May I respectfully point out that access that there is no demonstrable need to to potential small scale development include the site within the Plan. sites from the villages of Penrhos and Efailnewydd are already in place; and Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting 1050 RKJones[3194] Map 8 - Pwllheli Object could quite easily accommodate text and documentation have set out how additional vehicular access The land the Council proposes to manage the above Ala Road Pwllheli despite being delivery of new development including close to the skyline could with sensitive details on infrastructure planning. The LDP development ease the pressure on therefore demonstrates how development housing estates and business premises in can be managed, phased and impacts the town which are under increasing mitigated. It is considered that the LDP threat of rising water levels as a result of meets the tests of soundness without the climate change It is inevitable that this need for a different approach such as a land will need to be utilised for building new settlement or the suggested

61 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan purposes in the medium term future I am alternative site to deliver the identified also aware that a proportion of the land housing and employment needs. is offered protection under Historic Parks and Gardens designation and is as a Recommendation result unsuitable for development The The inclusion of the site is therefore not same applies to all land adjacent to Afon considered necessary to ensure the Rhydhir which floods on a regular basis. soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Accepted Objectors have drawn attention to legitimate issues relating to allocation T29’s ability to deliver the number of units set out in Policy TAI14 (the presence of a stream and trees on part of the site, and the site’s topography and shape means that it is unlikely that the site will deliver 30 dwellings per hectare). On this premise the The site hasn't been included within the Unit has reviewed objections relating to development boundary on the map. amendments to the development boundary Having looked at the sustainability to determine whether minor amendments H & V Williams appraisal and the content of Topic Paper 1435 Map 8 - Pwllheli Object could be made to ensure sufficient [2145] 1A, I am of the opinion that the flexibility within the Plan to deliver the information included in this document Plan’s strategy and objectives. highlights the site's suitability for housing development. Recommendation No issues were raised about the lower portion of this site during the plan preparation process and forms a reasonable extension to the existing built form. Therefore in line with the Plan’s spatial strategy and in order to ensure sufficient flexibility within the Plan the Unit is exploring the potential to include the

62 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan southern part of the objection site within the development boundary. Amend development boundary to include the site to help towards achieving the indicative figure for the settlement.

Focussed Change NF119

9) Beaumaris

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Accepted The Protected Open Space and Play Area The bowling Green is an established part of marked at Happy Valley omits part of the Beaumares’ leisure facilities relevant area. The Bowling Green, which Cyngor Tref is available for use by the public, has 537 Biwmares (Prof TW Map9–Beaumares Object Recommendation been omitted from the area marked. Ashenden) [1267 Identify as Portected Open Space on the Inset Map Change the marked areas as shown in the scanned document. Focussed Change NF120 Dwr Cymru Welsh * This site has planning permission as POLICY TAI15, T32 - 1354 Water (Mr Dewi Support such we have no further comment to Note the Support Casita, Beaumaris Griffiths ) [2680] make

10) Benllech

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * A water supply can be provided to serve Note the Support POLICY TAI15, T33 - Dwr Cymru Welsh this site. Land adjoining 1355 Water (Mr Dewi Support * Potential developers need to be aware Recommendation Wendon Cafe, Griffiths ) [2680] that the site is crossed by a sewer and Benllech protection measures in the form of No Change

63 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan easement widths or a diversion of the pipe would be required, which may impact upon the housing density achievable on site. * Benllech Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. The Deposit JLDP allocated T33 for Not Accepted Housing in Benllech, which is classed as a The representation seeks the inclusion of a Local Service Village. It is a popular new site not included within the Deposit settlement of some growing size and Plan. Having considered the policy context, population. There is a growing market Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other housing need here, and an even greater relevant material factors, it is considered local affordable housing need. Allocation that there is no demonstrable need to T33 is insufficient in size/density, and include the site within the Plan. inappropriate in location, and is by its beach-side location is patently more Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, attractive and appropriate for in-migrant supporting text and documentation have retiree/holiday homes, for which there is set out how the Council proposes to Mr M Williams- intense demand, to the detriment of local manage the delivery of new development 1107 Map 10 - Benllech Object Bulkeley [3229] persons in real housing need. including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how According to need, Benllech should be development can be managed, phased and allocated a more appropriately sized and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the located Housing Site. An alternative site LDP meets the tests of soundness without for housing is proposed at Ffordd the need for a different approach such as a Amlwch, Benllech. Please refer to the new settlement or the suggested comprehensive Supplementary alternative site to deliver the identified Information document on the proposed housing and employment needs. site, dated March 20, 2015. Recommendation The needs of local persons should The inclusion of the site is therefore not override the demands of affluent in- considered necessary to ensure the

64 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan migrants. Such needs are not recognised soundness of the JLDP. in the Plan. No Change

11) Bodedern

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Representations ID to Plan We fully support the new settlement in Bodedern village - Inset Map 11 - T34 at Treangharad. This plot is in a good location. The site/field is flat and well Accepted in Part drained. There is good access to the site Development boundaries are drawn from the main road where there is good around the urban form of settlements. The visibility both ways. There is a secondary development boundary should be school less than 100 yards north of the amended to include Rhoslwyn but not the POLICY TAI15, T34 - plot and a primary school approx. 700 plot of land as requested by the responder. Bleddyn & Bethan 618 Land near Llwyn Support yds. The site is on the bus and cycle Hughes [2121] Angharad, Bodedern route and is only one mile from the A55. Recommendation The doctor's surgery with dispensing To ensure the internal consistency of the facilities, village shops are all within easy plan the development boundary should be walking distance. amended to include Rhoslwyn.

If you require extra sites in Bodedern can Focussed Change NF121 you please consider plots on the same field beside the bungalow on map attached (T34) - (SP171) * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T34 - * The public sewerage network can 1356 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Llwyn Support accept the potential foul flows from the Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Angharad, Bodedern proposed development site. * Bodedern Wastewater Treatment No Change Works (WwTW) can accommodate the

65 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Representations ID to Plan foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to Land at Sarn Gannu can be linked with include the site within the Plan. allocation T34 to provide a comprehensive housing allocation which Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, will meet the increased housing needs of supporting text and documentation have Anglesey over the plan period given likely set out how the Council proposes to significant economic growth led by major manage the delivery of new development infrastructure projects over the plan including details on infrastructure planning. Dr Cledwyn Hughes period. There is an under-supply of 1282 Map 11 - Bodedern Object The LDP therefore demonstrates how [129] housing in the deposit Plan and an over development can be managed, phased and reliance on existing commitments which impacts mitigated. It is considered that the have failed to deliver in the past, LDP meets the tests of soundness without combined with an over reliance of the need for a different approach such as a windfall sites. Bodedern is a sustainable new settlement or the suggested settlement with a primary and secondary alternative site to deliver the identified school which could accommodate housing and employment needs. significant additional housing. Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

12) Cemaes

66 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan This site is a logical location for new housing development within Cemaes Bay. Note the Support POLICY TAI15, T35 - It is well related to the existing urban Land to rear of area, has ready access to services and has 504 J & A Parry [2980] Support Recommendation Holyhead Road, a suitable road access. In addition, the Cemaes developed site will have no deleterious No Change impact on the visual amenity of the locality or on the landscape. In 1990 an application to develop this site Not Accepted was refused following receipt of The representation seeks a deletion of a community survey highlighting the site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing concerns of local residents and there the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an POLICY TAI15, T35 - being no safe access on to the highway. extensive range of supporting evidence Cyngor Cymuned Land to rear of This issue is more apparent now than that demonstrates the housing 1300 Llanbadrig (Carli Object Holyhead Road, ever with an increase in traffic and road requirement over the JLDP period and has Evans-Thau) [1375] Cemaes use. Parking is also a big problem in the also identified the necessary infrastructure immediate area. Residents have required to support the development. The previously asked for pavements but the sites allocated within the plan are road is deemed to narrow and dangerous consistent with the overall plan Strategy for pedestrian use. and are deliverable within the plan period The land refT35 is first class agricultural to enable the JLDP to meet the identified land and was outside the original housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. boundaries of Cemaes Bay, which have recently been extended to include plot Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a T35. suite of policies and supporting text that POLICY TAI15, T35 - explains how development will be Miss J Madoc-Jones Land to rear of Land at Manora ref SP334 could be managed within the areas of change, and 1303 Object [3298] Holyhead Road, extended to link in with Maes Padrig and the mechanisms by which the necessary Cemaes Maes Cynfor where similar housing infrastructure, services and facilities will be already exists. Access for site SP334 secured. This policy framework also extended to Maes Padrig would be from includes the Councils’ requirement to A5025 Holyhead Road with access from mitigate potential impacts of development Maes Cynfor. in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of

67 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Concerns for the development of T35are: sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful 1. Road not designed or constructed to management of development in accommodate extra traffic use; environmentally sensitive areas or rural 2. Inadequate sewerage capacity for locations. major development with serious problems in the past; Recommendation: It is considered that the 3. Capacity of Cemaes Primary School to JLDP meets the tests of soundness without cope with additional pupils; the need for the removal of the site. 4. Capacity issues relating to the ability of Therefore, the proposed change is not Cemaes Bay Surgery to cope with considered necessary additional numbers. The land refT35 is first class agricultural No Change land and was outside the original boundaries of Cemaes Bay, which have recently been extended to include plot T35.

Land at Manora ref SP334 could be extended to link in with Maes Padrig and Maes Cynfor where similar housing POLICY TAI15, T35 - already exists. Access for site SP334 Felicity Lillywhite Land to rear of extended to Maes Padrig would be from 1304 Object [3299] Holyhead Road, A5025 Holyhead Road with access from Cemaes Maes Cynfor.

Concerns for the development of T35 are:

1. Road not designed or constructed to accommodate extra traffic use; 2. Inadequate sewerage capacity for major development with serious problems in the past; 3. Capacity of Cemaes Primary School to

68 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan cope with additional pupils; 4. Capacity issues relating to the ability of Cemaes Bay Surgery to cope with additional numbers. We are writing to lodge our objection to the change of use and proposed development of land located behind Lon Ysgubor. This land (T35) is located behind our property and runs alongside Ffordd y Felin which is adjacent to the primary school.

To summarise, our objections are: POLICY TAI15, T35 - Glyn & Karen Land to rear of 1. Loss of habitats, hedgerows and 1305 Object Williams [3300] Holyhead Road, wildlife. Cemaes 2. Depreciation of value to property. 3. Increase in risk to school children and pedestrians. 4. The ability of sewage systems to cope. 5. The increase in noise and possible crime impact. 6. Reduction in quality of life for residents. 7. Lack of consultation on changes to boundaries and housing needs. POLICY TAI15, T35 - Not Accepted Miss Gweneth Mary Land to rear of This land has always been agricultural The representation seeks a deletion of a 1379 Object Jones [3303] Holyhead Road, land site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing Cemaes the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an POLICY TAI15, T35 - Dubious at to the reasons for not extensive range of supporting evidence Mrs Cerrie Douglass Land to rear of developing the land at Manora (SP334) that demonstrates the housing 1397 Object [2736] Holyhead Road, directly behind Maes Cynfor and do not requirement over the JLDP period and has Cemaes agree with the 'poor access' argument. also identified the necessary infrastructure

69 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan There are capacity, parking and road required to support the development. The safety issues associated with Cemaes sites allocated within the plan are Primary School. Arguments used to consistent with the overall plan Strategy discount other sites are a matter of and are deliverable within the plan period personal opinion. Firmly believe that the to enable the JLDP to meet the identified land in question is unsuitable for housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. development. Risk of overdeveloping the village and killing the tourist industry. Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a Capacity issues with the local GP. Also an suite of policies and supporting text that issue with sewage systems. Impact on the explains how development will be Welsh Language. managed within the areas of change, and Strongly oppose development for the the mechanisms by which the necessary following grounds: infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also * impact on the free and safe flow of includes the Councils’ requirement to traffic, with particular reference to mitigate potential impacts of development POLICY TAI15, T35 - primary school; in relation to enhancing and protecting the Mrs G. L. Tennet Land to rear of 1426 Object * inadequacy of infrastructure, including natural and built environment, provision of [3352] Holyhead Road, school, to support development; sustainable transport, community facilities, Cemaes * site in an area of natural beauty and environmental assets and the careful valuable wildlife; management of development in * impact on quality of life; environmentally sensitive areas or rural * social housing would de-value locations. properties. * Wrong and misleading description for Recommendation: It is considered that the the site; JLDP meets the tests of soundness without * Feel there has been a lack of publicity the need for the removal of the site. POLICY TAI15, T35 - for adjacent neighbours; Therefore, the proposed change is not Mr Thomas Conway Land to rear of * Having affordable housing in this considered necessary 1823 Object [3371] Holyhead Road, location is contrary to original zoning Cemaes policy with Council estates located No Change elsewhere in the Village; * Maes Cynfor estate was never completed with land to West of

70 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan boundary available; * It is grade 3 agricultural land; * Limited capacity of sewage plant near Wylfa; * Anglesey document states no further development in Cemaes; * Refusal of previous residential application in 1990 on grounds of lack of need and road safety; * Adverse impact on value and amenity of adjacent houses; * Surface water problems with part of site; * An overage charge on the site impacts on its viability. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. Comments Noted * The public sewerage network can The Councils will continue to engage with accept the potential foul flows from the DCWW at the planning application stage. POLICY TAI15, T35 - proposed development site. Dwr Cymru Welsh Land to rear of * The proposed growth being promoted Recommendation 1357 Water (Mr Dewi Object Holyhead Road, for this settlement may require No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Cemaes improvements at Cemaes Wastewater matters raised. Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset No Change Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. Candidate Site SP851 was initially not Not Accepted taken forward in the deposit plan as it The representation seeks the inclusion of a was deemed to be in the open new site not included within the Deposit Mr&MrsHRees 954 Map 12 - Cemaes Object countryside. We now wish to resubmit it Plan. Having considered the policy context, [31] as an Alternative Site. Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered The site is situated within a that there is no demonstrable need to

71 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan cluster/settlement of 9 houses, all within include the site within the Plan. walking distance of Cemaes and all its facilities/services. Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have Development would be restricted to one set out how the Council proposes to eco-friendly property only. manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. Accessible from public highway with The LDP therefore demonstrates how adequate frontage to provide access. development can be managed, phased and The site is within the geographical spread impacts mitigated. It is considered that the of the village and would fit within the LDP meets the tests of soundness without medium growth option of the Spatial the need for a different approach such as a Strategy. (Consider Wylfa Newydd new settlement or the suggested Requirements) alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change We wish to object to the Deposit Local Not Accepted Development Plan's development The representation seeks the inclusion of a boundary for Cemaes. It is proposed that new site not included within the Deposit land to the west of the Football field Plan. Having considered the policy context, should be included within the Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other development boundary (as outlined in relevant material factors, it is considered 1390 MrLlyrJones[3307] Map12-Cemaes Object red on the attached plan). that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan. The site is within a sustainable location close to the A5025, a key public transport Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, route which will link the village with the supporting text and documentation have planned Wylfa Newydd Nuclear Power set out how the Council proposes to

72 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Station. manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The land is also close to the local primary The LDP therefore demonstrates how school and could be developed for development can be managed, phased and housing. impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change * Summary of issues identified with Not Accepted SP334 Manora in topic paper 1A is The representation seeks the inclusion of a incorrect, biased and based on an new site not included within the Deposit unjustified opinion; Plan. Having considered the policy context, * The access to the site is suitable and Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other easy and better than those for other relevant material factors, it is considered estates in the settlement; that there is no demonstrable need to * Existing access to the property on the include the site within the Plan. Mr Thomas Conway 1825 Map 12 - Cemaes Object site through the Maes Cynfor estate; [3371] * The original Maes Cynfor estate land Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, provision extended in a westerly supporting text and documentation have direction as far as the watercourse the set out how the Council proposes to original intention was to complete the manage the delivery of new development estate before changes in National Policy including details on infrastructure planning. in the 1980's; The LDP therefore demonstrates how * This area of land would be better suited development can be managed, phased and for development than the T35 site. impacts mitigated. It is considered that the

73 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation: The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, * Topic paper 1A states the site SP851 Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other land adjacent to Hafod is in the relevant material factors, it is considered countryside, but so is site T35; that there is no demonstrable need to * Topic paper 1A states it is unsuitable for include the site within the Plan. housing however no evidence is provided to support this statement; Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, * It further states that the allocation supporting text and documentation have Mr Thomas Conway 1826 Map 12 - Cemaes Object would be contrary to National Policy & set out how the Council proposes to [3371] JLDP strategy - both these are rejected as manage the delivery of new development not applicable; including details on infrastructure planning. * The group of houses around the Mill The LDP therefore demonstrates how was identified as a Rural Cluster in the development can be managed, phased and Interim Policy in 2011; impacts mitigated. It is considered that the * SP851 could be developed as the LDP meets the tests of soundness without adjoining property Hafod house. the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

74 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Recommendation: The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, * Topic paper 1A states the site SP852 Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other former Faraway Site is in the countryside, relevant material factors, it is considered but so is site T35; that there is no demonstrable need to * Topic paper 1A states it is unsuitable for include the site within the Plan. housing however no evidence is provided to support this statement; Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, * It further states that the allocation supporting text and documentation have would be contrary to National Policy & set out how the Council proposes to JLDP strategy - both these are rejected as manage the delivery of new development not applicable; including details on infrastructure planning. Mr Thomas Conway 1827 Map 12 - Cemaes Object * This is the site of the former Faraway The LDP therefore demonstrates how [3371] hotel and therefore is a brownfield site development can be managed, phased and and should be given a priority for impacts mitigated. It is considered that the appropriate development; LDP meets the tests of soundness without * The access has a steep gradient but the need for a different approach such as a never caused any difficulty for the hotel new settlement or the suggested clients nor for the usage in the alternative site to deliver the identified intervening years for industrial type housing and employment needs. storage by a local builder; * Should be allocated as a future high Recommendation quality housing of appropriate size. The inclusion of the alternative site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

75 13) Gaerwen

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to The Deposit LDP allocates no land for include the site within the Plan. housing in Gaerwen, which is classed as a Local Service Village. It is a settlement of Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting some growing size and population. There text and documentation have set out how is a growing market housing need here, the Council proposes to manage the and an even greater affordable housing delivery of new development including need. Such needs are not recognised in details on infrastructure planning. The LDP Mrs Sioned Jones the Plan. 1121 Map 13 - Gaerwen Object therefore demonstrates how development [3235] can be managed, phased and impacts According to the need, Gaerwen should mitigated. It is considered that the LDP be allocated a Housing site. An meets the tests of soundness without the alternative site for Housing is proposed, need for a different approach such as a at Lôn Graig, Gaerwen. Please refer to new settlement or the suggested the Supplementary Information alternative site to deliver the identified document on the proposed site, dated housing and employment needs. March 20, 2015. Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change 1124 Christine Webster Map 13 - Gaerwen Object We wish to object to the lack of Not Accepted

76 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan [3236] allocation of housing within the Local The representation seeks the inclusion of a Service Centre of Gaerwen and to the new site not included within the Deposit exclusion of the site which surrounds Plan. Having considered the policy context, Gaerwen Uchaf Business Park (as Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other identified in red on the attached plan) relevant material factors, it is considered from the development boundary of that there is no demonstrable need to Gaerwen. We wish to propose that the include the site within the Plan. site is included within the development boundary and allocated for mixed use Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting development comprising of housing, text and documentation have set out how public open space, community facilities the Council proposes to manage the development within the settlement. delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

14) Llanfairpwll

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan

77 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Potential developers need to be aware that this site is crossed by a water main and protection measures in the form of easement widths or a diversion of the Comments Noted pipe would be required, which may The Councils will continue to engage with impact upon the density achievable on DCWW at the planning application stage. site. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T36 - * Off-site sewers would be required to Recommendation 1358 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Bryn Eira, Object connect to the public sewerage network. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Llanfairpwll These can be provided through the sewer matters raised. requisition scheme under Sections 98- 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991 No Change * Llanfairpwll Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Site T37 is not the optimum housing site Not Accepted for the settlement of Llanfairpwll, The representation seeks a deletion of a because - site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing 1. In locational terms it is not the most the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an sustainable extensive range of supporting evidence 2. In locational terms it is not the most that demonstrates the housing accessible requirement over the JLDP period and has 3. The Alternative Site now available and also identified the necessary infrastructure POLICY TAI15, T37 - Mr TC Roberts proposed at 2d, was not proposed as a required to support the development. The 1334 Land near Penmynydd Object [3231] Candidate Site sites allocated within the plan are Road, Llanfairpwll 4. The Deposit Plan is unsound if it does consistent with the overall plan Strategy not consider and accept the Alternative and are deliverable within the plan period Site. to enable the JLDP to meet the identified housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. Site T37 should be OMITTED in favour of the Alternative Site now available and Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a proposed at - suite of policies and supporting text that Land at Lon Refail explains how development will be

78 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Llanfairpwll managed within the areas of change, and LL61 5YY the mechanisms by which the necessary OS GRID REF. SH 53536 72021 infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also (see comment 1109) includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary

No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T37 - * This site has planning permission as 1359 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Penmynydd Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Road, Llanfairpwll make No Change it is considered that the land allocated for Not Accepted housing within the Local Service Centre of The representation seeks the inclusion of a Llanfairpwll should remain within the new site not included within the Deposit Mr & Mrs Brooke 723 Map14-Llanfairpwll Support Local Development Plan. The site adjoins Plan. Having considered the policy context, [3081] the current UDP boundary along its Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other northern boundary and also adjoins the relevant material factors, it is considered settlement's built form in terms of the that there is no demonstrable need to

79 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan residential properties of Y Wern estate. include the site within the Plan. The site forms a logical and sustainable extension to the settlement with the A55 Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, creating a physical boundary preventing supporting text and documentation have intrusion into the open countryside. set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Site T36 is not the optimum housing site Not Accepted for the settlement of Llanfairpwll The representation seeks the inclusion of a because: new site not included within the Deposit 1. In locational terms it is not the most Plan. Having considered the policy context, sustainable Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Mr TC Roberts 2. In locational terms it is not the most relevant material factors, it is considered 1109 Map14-Llanfairpwll Object [3231] accessible that there is no demonstrable need to 3. The Alternative Site now available and include the site within the Plan. proposed at 2d, was not proposed as a Candidate Site Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, 4. The Deposit Plan is unsound if it does supporting text and documentation have not consider and accept the Alternative set out how the Council proposes to

80 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Site. manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. Site T36 should be omitted in favour of The LDP therefore demonstrates how the Alternative Site now available and development can be managed, phased and proposed at: Land at Lon Refail, impacts mitigated. It is considered that the Llanfairpwll, LL61 5YY, OS Grid Ref: LDP meets the tests of soundness without SH53536 72021 the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit We wish to propose an extension to the Plan. Having considered the policy context, allocated site on land adjacent to Bryn Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Eira for housing. Part of the site has been relevant material factors, it is considered allocated for housing within the centre of that there is no demonstrable need to Llanfairpwll to accommodate 30 units. It include the site within the Plan. Mr & Mrs Brooke is considered that extending the allocated 1388 Map14-Llanfairpwll Object [3081] site to include fields to the east would Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, ensure that the level of housing is supporting text and documentation have maintained over the plan period and set out how the Council proposes to would ensure that there is sufficient land manage the delivery of new development within the boundary to accommodate for including details on infrastructure planning. the identified housing need. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the

81 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

15) Menai Bridge

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh * This site has planning permission as POLICY TAI15, T38 - Ty 1360 Water (Mr Dewi Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Mawr, Menai Bridge Griffiths ) [2680] make. No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T39 - * This site has planning permission as 1361 Water (Mr Dewi Tyddyn Mostyn, Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Menai Bridge make. No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve Comments Noted this site. The Councils will continue to engage with Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T40 - * The public sewerage network can DCWW at the planning application stage. 1362 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Lôn Gamfa, Object accept the potential foul flows from the Griffiths ) [2680] Menai Bridge proposed development site. Recommendation * The proposed growth being promoted No change is required to address the

82 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan within the catchment area of Treborth matters raised. WwTW would require improvements at the treatment works which would need No Change to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. We wish to propose a site off Mount Street be included in the development Accepted boundary of Menai Bridge. The site is Development boundaries are drawn identified as being located immediately around the urban form of settlements. This adjoining the development boundary in 3 site forms a natural rounding off the directions. The proposed inclusion of the development boundary. site within the development boundary Mr & Mrs Brooke Map 15 - Menai 927 Object will assist in providing windfall sites to [3081] Bridge Recommendation accommodate the housing need over the To ensure the internal consistency of the plan period. It is considered that the site plan the development boundary should be would form a reasonable extension to the amended to include the site. development boundary sensitively infilling a small gap between existing Focussed Change NF? housing to accommodate the identified housing need. Land adj Tyddyn Isaf. The above Not Accepted information, which is supplemented by a The representation seeks the inclusion of a comprehensive sustainability appraisal of new site not included within the Deposit the site, indicates that the site is suitable Plan. Having considered the policy context, for housing and should be included as a Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other candidate/allocated site within the JLDP. relevant material factors, it is considered Watkin Jones (Mr Map 15 - Menai 1017 Object The site is accessible, available, that there is no demonstrable need to Stuart Hardy) [3159] Bridge deliverable and developable and can help include the site within the Plan. Anglesey/Gwynedd meet its housing requirements throughout the plan Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, period. It is therefore considered to be supporting text and documentation have appropriate to be brought forward due to set out how the Council proposes to its highly sustainable location in Menai manage the delivery of new development

83 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Bridge, which is recognised within the including details on infrastructure planning. JLDP as a priority area for development. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted Pentraeth Automotive, Henffordd, Menai The representation seeks the inclusion of a Bridge. The above information, which is new site not included within the Deposit supplemented by a comprehensive Plan. Having considered the policy context, sustainability appraisal of the site, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other indicates that the site is suitable for other relevant material factors, it is considered uses, preferably for housing (or that there is no demonstrable need to leisure/retail) and should be included as a include the site within the Plan. candidate/allocated site within the JLDP. Watkin Jones (Mr Map 15 - Menai 1018 Object The site is brownfield land and as such Stuart Hardy) [3159] Bridge Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, the principle of built development has supporting text and documentation have already been established. Whilst the site set out how the Council proposes to is not currently available, there is manage the delivery of new development reasonable prospect that it would including details on infrastructure planning. become available in the future. The site The LDP therefore demonstrates how is deliverable and developable and can development can be managed, phased and help Anglesey/Gwynedd meet to impacts mitigated. It is considered that the development requirements. LDP meets the tests of soundness without

84 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Land opp Tafarn Four Crosses, Menai relevant material factors, it is considered Bridge. We wish to object to the that there is no demonstrable need to development boundary of Menai Bridge. include the site within the Plan. We wish to propose a site on land to the north-west of the Four Crosses Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Roundabout to be included within the Cadnant Planning supporting text and documentation have Map 15 - Menai development boundary of Menai Bridge 1157 (Mr Rhys Davies) Object set out how the Council proposes to Bridge for the allocation of mixed use [1366] manage the delivery of new development development on the site is considered to including details on infrastructure planning. be deliverable due to the site's merits of The LDP therefore demonstrates how being located in a popular, accessible and development can be managed, phased and sustainable location, having excellent impacts mitigated. It is considered that the social and transport links with the nearby LDP meets the tests of soundness without regional centre of Bangor. the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

85 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

16) Pentraeth

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a Meithrinfa Pentraeth Nursery, Pentraeth. new site not included within the Deposit Pentraeth has been categorised as a Local Plan. Having considered the policy context, Service Centre under Policy TAI15. It is Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other identified within Strategic Policy PS15 relevant material factors, it is considered that at least 20% of the plan's growth is that there is no demonstrable need to located within Local Service Centres. include the site within the Plan. However, no land has been allocated within Pentraeth for housing. It is Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting Cadnant Planning considered that there is an over-reliance text and documentation have set out how 1159 (Mr Rhys Davies) Map16-Pentraeth Object on windfall sites with the LDP. It is not the Council proposes to manage the [1366] considered that there is sufficient delivery of new development including landbank within the development details on infrastructure planning. The LDP boundary to accommodate the identified therefore demonstrates how development housing need. Therefore, we wish to can be managed, phased and impacts propose a brownfield site at Pentraeth mitigated. It is considered that the LDP Nursery to be included within the meets the tests of soundness without the development plan and allocated for need for a different approach such as a housing. new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

86 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Land at Glanrafon, Pentraeth. Pentraeth relevant material factors, it is considered has been categorised as a Local Service that there is no demonstrable need to Centre under Policy TAI15. It is identified include the site within the Plan. within Strategic Policy P1S15 that at least 20% of the plan's growth is located within Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting Local Service Centres. However, no land text and documentation have set out how has been allocated within Pentraeth for the Council proposes to manage the Cadnant Planning housing. It is considered that there is an delivery of new development including 1160 (Mr Rhys Davies) Map16-Pentraeth Object over-reliance on windfall sites within the details on infrastructure planning. The LDP [1366] Local Development Plan. It is not therefore demonstrates how development considered that there is sufficient can be managed, phased and impacts landbank within the development mitigated. It is considered that the LDP boundary to accommodate the identified meets the tests of soundness without the housing need. We wish to propose the need for a different approach such as a Glanrafon site for inclusion in the new settlement or the suggested development boundary and allocated for alternative site to deliver the identified housing. housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

87 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan

No Change

17) Rhosneigr

• No Representations

18) Valley

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * The public sewerage network can Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T41 - accept the potential foul flows from the 1363 Water (Mr Dewi Former Cattle Market Support proposed development site. Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] site, Valley * Holyhead Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the No Change foul flows from the proposed growth figures. Land adj Bryn Derwen, Valley. The Not Accepted Authority needs to increase the level of The representation seeks the inclusion of a housing than currently planned for to new site not included within the Deposit meet expected housing need. For Plan. Having considered the policy context, example, in order to meet the needs of Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Strutt and Parker (Jo Wylfa construction workers, a degree of relevant material factors, it is considered 1045 Map 18 - Valley Object Remond) [3188] whom are likely to permanently relocate that there is no demonstrable need to to Anglesey. There are a number of include the site within the Plan. smaller sustainable settlements, including Valley/Gorad which have the capacity to Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, accommodate more growth than supporting text and documentation have currently planned for. set out how the Council proposes to

88 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

19) Barmouth

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan There are serious errors in the Accepted judgements and methods used to Development boundaries are drawn around calculate the urban capacity for the urban form of settlements. The land in Barmouth detailed in Topic Paper 6 question is considered to be part of resulting in a significant and Barmouth’s urban form. Mr Rob Bonser 978 Map19-Barmouth Object inappropriate reliance on the conversion [3143] of existing large houses and commercial Recommendation properties and the contribution of the To ensure the internal consistency of the empty homes strategy. The inclusion of plan the development boundary should be this brownfield site, which has been the amended to include the land in question. subject of previous planning consents for

89 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan residential development, within the Focussed Change NF123 development boundary for Barmouth, would help support and achieve the required indicative windfall provision of 81 dwelling units in Policy TAI15. Redrafting of the development boundary for Barmouth indicated on Inset Map 19 to include this site. Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit The land for which Planning Permission Plan. Having considered the policy context, was granted on the 1st July 2009 whilst Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other the Unitary Development Plan was still relevant material factors, it is considered current (and is to the present day) should that there is no demonstrable need to be re-included within the Development include the site within the Plan. Boundary for Barmouth. Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting The land met Planning Policy text and documentation have set out how requirements at that time and thus must the Council proposes to manage the hold to be in accord with policies at Mr Bruce Davies delivery of new development including 1387 Map19-Barmouth Object present time since the UDP had not yet [3305] details on infrastructure planning. The LDP been superseded by the LDP. therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts Barmouth has been identified in the LDP mitigated. It is considered that the LDP consultation process as requiring 27 no. meets the tests of soundness without the dwellings to fulfil its housing need for a different approach such as a requirements for the term of the LDP. new settlement or the suggested This site represents a parcel of land that alternative site to deliver the identified was previously considered suitable for housing and employment needs. development under the UDP but would also meet planning windfall criteria. Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the

90 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan. As planning permission for two dwellings Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting has previously been approved on this text and documentation have set out how land, and in light of the fact that some 90 the Council proposes to manage the new dwellings are recommended for the delivery of new development including Barmouth area (a number which may not Cyngor Tref details on infrastructure planning. The LDP be achieved within the existing time 1707 Abermaw (Ms Sue Map19-Barmouth Object therefore demonstrates how development frame), the Town Council is in unanimous Phillips) [3318] can be managed, phased and impacts agreement that the area of land owned mitigated. It is considered that the LDP by Mr Evans (adjacent to his home, and meets the tests of soundness without the previously having been granted planning need for a different approach such as a permission for two dwellings) should be new settlement or the suggested included within the development area. alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

91 20) Abersoch

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other I submit that part of the land shown on relevant material factors, it is considered the proposal map under reference SP352 that there is no demonstrable need to should be included as land suitable for include the site within the Plan. housing in the future. It is not an encroachment into open countryside but Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting would in fact be infill between already text and documentation have set out how existing housing areas. The benefit from the Council proposes to manage the existing mains services and access to the delivery of new development including adjoining highway. It is well sheltered and details on infrastructure planning. The LDP Emlyn Williams 953 Map 20 - Abersoch Object would not be detrimental to the visual therefore demonstrates how development [2153] amenity. Development would support can be managed, phased and impacts local employment and residential need. mitigated. It is considered that the LDP Test of soundness (CE2) - The strategy, meets the tests of soundness without the policies and allocations are not realistic need for a different approach such as a and appropriate having considered the new settlement or the suggested relevant alternatives. alternative site to deliver the identified Extend the development boundary to housing and employment needs. include land as shown on the attached plan. Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change The settlement boundary drawnon the Not Accepted Mr Rod Thompson 956 Map 20 - Abersoch Object inset map for Abersoch splits the It is considered that the Deposit Plan [3125] curtilage of the property (shown edged identifies sufficient, deliverable and

92 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan red on the attached plan) into two. It is appropriate housing land in the area and illogical that half of the curtilage of the the proposed change is not considered property should be excluded from the required to ensure the soundness of the settlement boundary particularly when it plan. is adjoined on three sides by residential development that lie within the Recommendation settlement boundary and on the fourth Amending the development boundary is side by the Cors Llyferin SSSI where not considered necessary to ensure the further expansion of the settlement soundness of the Plan. would not be permitted. No Change Modification of the Settlement Boundary for Abersoch as indicated on the attached plan Extend the village boundary along Lon Not Accepted Garmon for the following reasons: It is considered that the Deposit Plan * Not enough plots available to build the identifies sufficient, deliverable and further dwellings in Abersoch appropriate housing land in the area and * Strong demand for local housing in and the proposed change is not considered around the Abersoch area. required to ensure the soundness of the * The site is a sustainable, feasible, plan. suitable and a deliverable site, free of development constraints such as issues Recommendation Mr Daniel Bufton with drainage, access & flooding. Amending the development boundary is 1026 Map 20 - Abersoch Object [321] * Form a sensible development boundary not considered necessary to ensure the as is adjoining to the existing building soundness of the Plan. line. * The site is on a major public transport No Change (bus) route and within close proximity, therefore walking distance of all of Abersoch's amenities, shops, school, banks, etc. * The site is NOT within the AONB, but a conservation area

93 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * There is good access. Not Accepted Whilst we acknowledge and support the The representation seeks the inclusion of a identification of Abersoch as a Local new site not included within the Deposit Service Centre, we object to Policy TAI15 Plan. Having considered the policy context, on the grounds that no sites are Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other identified as housing land allocations relevant material factors, it is considered within the settlement. We also object on that there is no demonstrable need to the grounds that the site promoted (Hen include the site within the Plan. Dy Farm - SP 830) is excluded from the schedule of housing allocations under Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting this policy. text and documentation have set out how We contend that insufficient provision is the Council proposes to manage the made in the local service centre of delivery of new development including Abersoch as there is limited scope within details on infrastructure planning. The LDP 1027 Mr Alex Badley [255] Map 20 - Abersoch Object the existing settlement boundary to therefore demonstrates how development provide for local housing needs, including can be managed, phased and impacts affordable housing. mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the By not providing for necessary growth in need for a different approach such as a such a sustainable settlement the Deposit new settlement or the suggested Plan fails Test of Soundness C2 and CE2. alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs. The site in question should be allocated for 90 dwellings in subsequent Focused Recommendation Changes. This would be of a scale The inclusion of the site is therefore not compatible with the role and function of considered necessary to ensure the Abersoch and its status as a Local Service soundness of the JLDP. Centre. No Change Council for the We question whether 65 windfall/infill Not Accepted Protection of Rural sites could be found within the village The representation seeks the inclusion of a 1292 Map 20 - Abersoch Object Wales (Mr Noel development boundary of Abersoch and new site not included within the Deposit Davey) [1169] would prefer a suitable housing site to be Plan. Having considered the policy context,

94 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan identified. If there is evidence of genuine Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other need for additional affordable/local relevant material factors, it is considered housing on this scale, then in principle we that there is no demonstrable need to would support use of SP830 (south) include the site within the Plan. adjacent to the village boundary in the west. We would oppose other candidate Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting site proposals on the Sarn Bach road and text and documentation have set out how in Machroes further from the village the Council proposes to manage the boundary, or in Mynytho, principally on delivery of new development including grounds of adverse landscape impact. details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

21) Bethesda

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY CYF1, C17 - * Our local water network should be Note the Support 1635 Support Water (Mr Dewi Felin Fawr, Bethesda sufficient to provide the domestic water

95 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Griffiths ) [2680] demands required to serve this Recommendation development area. * Potential developers need to be aware No Change that the site is crossed by a sewer. Under the Water Industry Act 1991 Dwr Cymru Welsh Water has rights to access its apparatus at all times. Protection measures in respect of these assets will be required either in the form of an easement width or a possible diversion of the asset. * Tregarth Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered We do not believe that there is sufficient that there is no demonstrable need to existing land bank and windfall sites include the site within the Plan. within the Bethesda development RCH Douglas boundary to meet the indicative level of 1200 Map 21 - Bethesda Object Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Pennant [3070] growth. A wider settlement boundary supporting text and documentation have should be drawn to include the land adj set out how the Council proposes to Maes Coetmor site which was within the manage the delivery of new development UDP development boundary. including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a

96 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

22) Criccieth

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Although, the site is not identified as being within a flood risk zone, NRW is aware of a history of flooding from the Comments Noted Afon Cwrt which flows through the site. The Councils will continue to engage with The river enters a culvert at the bottom DCWW at the planning application stage. Cyfoeth Naturiol of the site, and any blockage of the Cymru / Natural POLICY TAI15, T42 - screen could increase flood risk. Due to Recommendation 1085 Resource Wales Land near North Object the steep nature of the land, it is unlikely No change is required to address the (Ymgynhoriadau Terrace, Criccieth that flooding would affect a large matters raised. Cynllunio) [1521] proportion of the site. However, NRW would expect any planning application to No Change be supported by a Flood Consequence Assessment to ensure that development is adequately protected. * A water supply can be provided to serve Comments Noted Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T42 - this site. The Councils will continue to engage with 1364 Water (Mr Dewi Land near North Object * Potential developers need to be aware DCWW at the planning application stage. Griffiths ) [2680] Terrace, Criccieth that the site is crossed by a sewer and

97 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan protection measures in the form of Recommendation easement widths or a diversion of the No change is required to address the pipe would be required, which may matters raised. impact upon the housing density achievable on site. No Change * The proposed growth being promoted for this settlement may require improvements at Criccieth Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. We live at Helidon, L.on Merllyn, Criccieth and have a protected open space area as per the deposit plan in our garden.

A number of houses have been built Accepted either side of the garden e.g. Curtilage of garden with no public "Broadlands" "Fern Dell" and a number of recreational value houses have been built over the last few Mr Maldwyn Evans 1380 Map 22 – Criccieth Object years on the opposite side of the A497 in [2619] Recommendation Morannedd. Remove protected open space status. The garden can only be seen by high Focussed Change NF124 sided vehicles from the main road. There is also a separate access to the garden from the right hand side of the property.

Delete the protected open space status.

23) Llanberis

98 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * The public sewerage network can Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T43 - accept the potential foul flows from the 1365 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Victoria Support proposed development site. Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Hotel, Llanberis * Llanberis Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul No Change flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Comment Noted

The site has planning permission and development has started. Biodiversity issues were discussed and mitigated during North Wales Wildlife POLICY TAI15, T44 - the planning application stage. 377 Trust (Mr Chris Land near Tŷ Du Road, Object This area is also awoodland localWS Wynne) [2626] Llanberis Recommendation No change is required to address the matters raised.

No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T44 - * This site has planning permission as 1366 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Tŷ Du Road, Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Llanberis make. No Change This area would be ideal for families Not Accepted having gardens and walking to the school The representation seeks the inclusion of a and village. The road at Church Lane new site not included within the Deposit could be easily widened on my land to Plan. Having considered the policy context, 917 AnnSweeney[2052] Map23-Llanberis Object provide passing, parking and the building Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other of some new houses (A small number). relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to I would like to see the boundary include the site within the Plan.

99 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan extended to include this area and allow for people to have small and affordable Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, house in a very pleasant rural area , with supporting text and documentation have lots of space around. Llanberis is a set out how the Council proposes to thriving village and we need to provide manage the delivery of new development for our young people. (CE4). including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change The Boundary for Llanberis does not Accepted extend enough as it has not taken into Agree that the site forms part of the account my proposed site which falls well settlement’s built form and its inclusion within the Village boundary and is not within the development boundary would: within the Countryside. The site is provide sufficient flexibility within the Plan immediately opposite an area of to achieve the indicative windfall figure for John M Prydderch 995 Map 23 - Llanberis Object residential development and is placed Llanberis; align with the Plan’s spatial Roberts [3157] within two main roads. The site is not a strategy; and ensure the internal Greenfield site but a Brownfield site and consistency of the Plan. very suitable for development. I understand for the settlement of Recommendation Llanberis Indicative additional number of Amend Development boundary to include housing required is 53 to 2026 therefore, the land in question.

100 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan additional suitable sites in Llanberis is limited therefore not to be missed. Focussed Change NF125

To include my suggested site as per enclosed map The community of Llainwen, Tŷ Du Road and Yankee Street have extreme concern about the proposed inclusion of site SP427 as a suitable housing development Not Accepted site in the joint local development plan. Site is not included in the JDLP. Whilst we note and agree with your consideration at review that access to Guy (Paddy) Smith Recommendation 1672 Map 23 - Llanberis Object this site and ensuring traffic and parking [2101] No change necessary as the site is not problems it will cause are prohibitive to included within the Deposit Plan. its success, we would like to add in objection the well known and recorded No Change history of this site as a flood plain. We feel this is also prohibitive to its development and subsequent property insurance issues.

24) Llanrug

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh * This site has planning permission as POLICY TAI15, T45 - 1367 Water (Mr Dewi Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Church Field, Llanrug Griffiths ) [2680] make No Change POLICY TAI15, T46 - Land opposite former Hafod garage, Not Accepted 1295 MrIanTrevor[2930] Land near Rhythallt Object Llanrug: proposed housing allocation & The representation seeks the inclusion of a Road, Llanrug inclusion within development boundary new site not included within the Deposit

101 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan of Llanrug. Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other * Proposed site is a sustainable relevant material factors, it is considered development proposal. that there is no demonstrable need to * The suggested site is an appropriate include the site within the Plan. addition to the settlement, and would perform better against the LDP's criteria Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, than site T46. supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to Deletion of housing allocation T46 manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T46 - * This site has planning permission as 1368 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Rhythallt Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Road, Llanrug make No Change Cyngor Cymuned At a recent meeting of the Community Note the Support 981 Llanrug. (Mr Meirion Map 24 - Llanrug Support Council, Councillor Charles Jones Jones) [3134] explained the amendments to the above Recommendation

102 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Plan and that he, as a Local Member, was very happy with the amendments. This No Change was endorsed unanimously by the Community Council and I was requested to contact you to express the Community Council's satisfaction with the plan and to express gratitude to you for considering local concerns.

The Council intends to contact you again in future to express their views on the type of housing they are eager to see being approved in Llanrug. I wish to submit an alternative site for Not Accepted consideration in the plan for the village of The representation seeks the inclusion of a Llanrug. new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, This land was located within the Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other development boundary of Llanrug in the relevant material factors, it is considered consultative version of the Unitary that there is no demonstrable need to Development Plan in 2002 which in my include the site within the Plan. opinion acknowledges the suitability of the site to be included as an alternative Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, 1011 MrDMPrice[274] Map24-Llanrug Object site. supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to The site is located in the centre of the manage the delivery of new development village, adjacent to the Minffordd estate including details on infrastructure planning. which means that the sewerage The LDP therefore demonstrates how infrastructure and the mains water and development can be managed, phased and electricity systems are conveniently impacts mitigated. It is considered that the located for the site. LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a There is a lack of affordable housing in new settlement or the suggested the village and the document notes that alternative site to deliver the identified

103 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan there is a need for 14 extra units. I housing and employment needs. believe that it is crucially important for the sustainability of Welsh communities Recommendation that there is sufficient affordable housing The inclusion of the site is therefore not provision for local people to enable them considered necessary to ensure the to remain within their localities. soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan. Land opposite former Hafod garage, Llanrug: proposed housing allocation & Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, inclusion within development boundary supporting text and documentation have of Llanrug in place of T46. set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development 1123 MrIanTrevor[2930] Map24-Llanrug Object * Proposed site is a sustainable including details on infrastructure planning. development proposal. The LDP therefore demonstrates how * The suggested site is an appropriate development can be managed, phased and addition to the settlement, and would impacts mitigated. It is considered that the perform better against the LDP's criteria LDP meets the tests of soundness without than site T46. the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the

104 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

25) Nefyn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that will need to be resolved to allow development to proceed. Potential developers can either wait for DCWW to Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T47 - resolve the flooding, subject to funding 1369 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Helyg, Object being approved by our regulator Ofwat, Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Nefyn or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of No Change the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. * Nefyn Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T48 - * This site has planning permission as 1370 Water (Mr Dewi Former Allotments, Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Nefyn make. No Change Council for the 27.1 We have no objection to site T47 Not Accepted 719 Protection of Rural Map 25 - Nefyn Object which involves a logical extension to the The representation seeks the inclusion of a Wales (Mr Noel eastern boundary of the town. There is new site not included within the Deposit

105 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Davey) [1169] no explanation of why land near the Plan. Having considered the policy context, Holborn Estate included in the GUDP for Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other housing has been deleted and the relevant material factors, it is considered boundary redrawn. Similarly, an isolated that there is no demonstrable need to development area to the south east of include the site within the Plan. the town in the GUDP has been deleted from JLDP. Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change The proposed allocation of alternative Not Accepted site known as Land at Nefyn (East of Y The representation seeks the inclusion of a Fron)for 16 residential units. Site is new site not included within the Deposit Lord Newborough supported for the following reasons: Plan. Having considered the policy context, 1040 Map 25 - Nefyn Object [3187] Deliverability - Positive Planning. Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Allocated Housing Numbers relevant material factors, it is considered Development Principle that there is no demonstrable need to Opportunities and Constraints - As include the site within the Plan.

106 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan attached at Appendix 1 Indicative Masterplan - As attached at Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Appendix 2 supporting text and documentation have Positive Sustainability Appraisal set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development Allocation of additional site known as including details on infrastructure planning. Land at Nefyn (East of Y Fron) to provide The LDP therefore demonstrates how 16 residential units as indicated on the development can be managed, phased and Opportunities and Constraints Plan. A impacts mitigated. It is considered that the Sustainability Appraisal has been carried LDP meets the tests of soundness without out and is included in the supporting the need for a different approach such as a documentation. new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change The proposed allocation of alternative Not Accepted site known as Site South of Nefyn off The representation seeks the inclusion of a A497 for 16 residential units. Site is new site not included within the Deposit supported for the following reasons: Plan. Having considered the policy context, Deliverability - Positive Planning. Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Allocated Housing Numbers relevant material factors, it is considered Lord Newborough 1041 Map 25 - Nefyn Object Development Principle that there is no demonstrable need to [3187] Opportunities and Constraints - As include the site within the Plan. attached at Appendix 1 Indicative Masterplan - As attached at Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Appendix 2 supporting text and documentation have Positive Sustainability Appraisal set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development

107 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Allocation of additional site known as Site including details on infrastructure planning. South of Nefyn off A497 to provide 16 The LDP therefore demonstrates how residential units as indicated on the development can be managed, phased and Opportunities and Constraints Plan. A impacts mitigated. It is considered that the Sustainability Appraisal has been carried LDP meets the tests of soundness without out and is included in the supporting the need for a different approach such as a documentation. new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

26) Penrhyndeudraeth

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. Comments Noted * The public sewerage network can The Councils will continue to engage with accept the potential foul flows from the DCWW at the planning application stage. proposed development site. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T49 - * The foul flows would lead to Recommendation 1371 Water (Mr Dewi Canol Cae, Object Penrhyndeudraeth Pumping Station (SPS) No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Penrhyndeudraeth and an assessment of this SPS may be matters raised. needed to establish whether the flows can be accommodated or whether No Change improvements to the SPS will be required to allow development to proceed.

108 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Penrhyndeudraeth Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * The public sewerage network can accept the potential foul flows from the Comments Noted proposed development site. The Councils will continue to engage with * The foul flows would lead to DCWW at the planning application stage. Penrhyndeudraeth Pumping Station (SPS) POLICY TAI15, T50 - Dwr Cymru Welsh and an assessment of this SPS may be Land near former Recommendation 1372 Water (Mr Dewi Object needed to establish whether the flows Bron Garth Hospital, No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] can be accommodated or whether Penrhyndeudraeth matters raised. improvements to the SPS will be required to allow development to proceed. No Change * Penrhyndeudraeth Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. Comments Noted * The public sewerage network can The Councils will continue to engage with accept the potential foul flows from the DCWW at the planning application stage. proposed development site. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T51 - * The foul flows would lead to Recommendation 1373 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Canol Cae, Object Penrhyndeudraeth Pumping Station (SPS) No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Penrhyndeudraeth and an assessment of this SPS may be matters raised. needed to establish whether the flows can be accommodated or whether No Change improvements to the SPS will be required to allow development to proceed.

109 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Penrhyndeudraeth Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Porthmadog's needs should not be Not Accepted satisfied in Penrhyndeudraeth because: Although Porthmadog is defended against * Motoring difficulties along streets, flooding, large parts of the settlement are which will be exacerbated anyway when categorised as being within Zone C1. A Cyngor Tref Pont Briwet is completed; core function of the Plan is to ensure that Penrhynddeudraeth Map 26 - * Parking is a major problem; all development is sustainable, having 1430 Object (Mr Glyn Roberts) Penrhyndeudraeth * No room to expand the school; regard to the implications of addressing [1261] * Create difficulties to gain access to the climate change. Development proposals surgery car park, where an accident that would lead to a reduction in floodplain occurred in 2015. storage capacity or impede flood flows are Intense consideration needs to be given strongly discouraged. On this basis and the to these spatial and traffic issues. lack of alternative sites beyond the flood risk area, the Plan cannot allocate land for I object to the fact that housing in Porthmadog. Penrhyndeudraeth has to absorb more housing units because Porthmadog is Criccieth and Penrhyndeudraeth have been unable to accept its quota of housing. I chosen after taking into account a range of understand the reason for this, in that factors. Both Local Service Centres have Porthmadog is in an area at risk of good transport links with Porthmadog and flooding. But the requirement that Cyngor Gwynedd each one has a good level of services that Map 26 - adjoining towns like Penrhyndeudraeth 1437 (Cyng/Counc Gareth Object provide their residents the opportunity to Penrhyndeudraeth and Criccieth accept additional housing is Thomas) [402] walk to them to satisfy their everyday completely unacceptable for a number of requirements, thus reducing the need for reasons, which includes: capacity of journeys to Porthmadog. streets to deal with extra traffic, capacity of Ysgol Cefn Coch, the surgery and car Recommendation park, as well as doubt about the The JPPU commissioned Ymgynghoriaeth suitability and therefore the viability of Gwynedd Consultancy to undertake a stage sites allocated for housing. 2 Strategic Flood Consequences

110 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Assessment for Porthmadog so that the Unit could address objections 1430 and 1437 and therefore ascertain whether there were any development opportunities in Porthmadog that would align with the requirements of TAN15. The SFCA2 concluded that the accessible sites for development in the town were all subject to flood risk. As indicated in section 3 of this report the Deposit Plan contains a suite of policies and supporting text that explains how development will be managed within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

No Change We object to the development boundary Accepted in Part which runs through the centre of our Development boundaries are drawn around property. The stable is outside the the urban form of settlements. Agree that Mr Geraint Evans Map 26 - 1669 Object development boundary and the line of the stable forms parts of the settlement’s [2855] Penrhyndeudraeth the boundary does not follow any built form. physical of visual line to the south of the buildings. This will lead to uncertainty Recommendation: To ensure the internal

111 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan when assessing policy and will reduce the consistency of the plan the development option to extend the B&B enterprise. As boundary should be amended to include a listed building there is an opportunity the stable but the remainder of the garden to change the use of the stable to should not be included as the plan follows safeguard the building for the future. physical boundaries, where possible, and The entire property is considered to be not land ownership. an essential part of the town and its built form. According to our Sustainability Focussed Change NF126 Appraisal the site is suitable to be included within the development boundary.

27) Penygroes

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan North Wales Wildlife POLICY TAI15, T52 - Comment Noted 370 Trust (Mr Chris Land near Maes Object This area includes partof alocalWS The western side of the allocation is Wynne) [2626] Dulyn, Penygroes identified as a Candidate Wildlife site. Discussions with the Biodiversity Unit state that this field does not contain a habitat of high value but the there is a hedge ditch which is worth retaining. North Wales Wildlife POLICY TAI15, T52 - 371 Trust (Mr Chris Land near Maes Object This area includes partof alocalWS Recommendations Wynne) [2626] Dulyn, Penygroes In lieu of comments from the Biodiversity Unit no change is required to plan

No Change

Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI15, T52 - A water supply can be provided to serve Note the Support 1374 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Maes Support this site. Potential developers need to be Griffiths ) [2680] Dulyn, Penygroes aware that the site is crossed by a water Recommendation

112 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan main and protection measures in the form of easement widths or a diversion No Change of the pipe would be required, which may impact upon the housing density achievable on site. Potential developers need to be aware that the site is crossed by a sewer and protection measures in the form of easement widths or a diversion of the pipe would be required, which may impact upon the housing density achievable on site. Llanllyfni Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate Not Accepted I object to the plan as I want the land The representation seeks the inclusion of a behind Maes Llyn (No:854, map inset 27) new site not included within the Deposit to be included within the development Plan. Having considered the policy context, boundary in order to build a house on it. I Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other live in a small terraced house in relevant material factors, it is considered Penygroes and need a larger house in that there is no demonstrable need to order to accommodate my growing include the site within the Plan. family. It is currently impossible for me to purchase another house in the area Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Mr Malcolm Love Map 27 - Penygroes, because they are out of my price range. 925 Object supporting text and documentation have [3106] Gwynedd The land behind Maes Llyn is in an ideal set out how the Council proposes to location for building a house without manage the delivery of new development extending the development boundary out including details on infrastructure planning. of Penygroes, by infilling between the The LDP therefore demonstrates how Cefn Faes houses and the Penygroes development can be managed, phased and Factory. impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without I wish to see changes made to the deposit the need for a different approach such as a plan to include land 854 (map inset 27) in new settlement or the suggested the dwelling boundary. alternative site to deliver the identified

113 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

28) Tywyn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh * This site has planning permission as POLICY TAI15, T53 - 1375 Water (Mr Dewi Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Sŵn y Tonnau, Tywyn Griffiths ) [2680] make. No Change Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh * This site has planning permission as POLICY TAI15, T54 - 1376 Water (Mr Dewi Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Garreglwyd, Tywyn Griffiths ) [2680] make. No Change * Our local water network is sufficient to provide the domestic water demands required to serve this development area. Note the Support * The public sewerage network can Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY CYF1, C9 - accept the domestic foul flows arising 1624 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Pendre Estate, Tywyn from this development area. Griffiths ) [2680] * Tywyn Wastewater Treatment Works No Change (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the domestic demands arising from this development area.

114 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Site excluded from the Development Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Boundary due to the land being claimed relevant material factors, it is considered to be within the C2 Flood Zone. Site that there is no demonstrable need to Levels provided for the nearby and include the site within the Plan. adjacent approved dwellings shows that the subject land requested to be included Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, is set at a higher level. Thus the reasoning supporting text and documentation have for exclusion of the land due to it being set out how the Council proposes to subject to C2 Zone status on flooding is manage the delivery of new development incorrect. Estimated ground levels on including details on infrastructure planning. Environment Agency Flood Maps which 1051 MrTimSingh[3195] Map28-Tywyn Object The LDP therefore demonstrates how are conceded to be less accurate than development can be managed, phased and actual Landform levels taken on site and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the referred directly to Ordnance Survey LDP meets the tests of soundness without Datums. the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested The Site to be included within the alternative site to deliver the identified Development Boundary for Tywyn due to housing and employment needs. the reasoning for its exclusion of being within the C2 Zone being proven by Recommendation actual Ground levels to be wholly The inclusion of the alternative site is incorrect. therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

SERVICE VILLAGES

29) Gwalchmai

115 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan A water supply can be provided to serve this site.

Potential developers need to be aware that this site is crossed by a sewer and protection measures in the form of Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T55 - easement widths or a diversion of the 1335 Water (Mr Dewi Land near the A5, Support pipe would be required, which may Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Gwalchmai impact upon the housing density achievable on site. No Change

Gwalchmai Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan. The land edged blue on the Plan has been omitted. Could you please let me know 1413 MariBall[2258] Map29-Gwalchmai Object Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, the reasons why the land edged red has supporting text and documentation have not been included in the (Joint LDP) set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a

116 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

30) Newborough

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T56 - This site has planning permission as such 1336 Water (Mr Dewi Tyn Cae Estate, Support Recommendation we have no further comment to make. Griffiths ) [2680] Newborough No Change Include land previously granted planning Not Accepted permission within Newborough It is considered that the Deposit Plan Development boundary. identifies sufficient, deliverable and a) Site is within the stopped udp appropriate housing land in the area and boundary (PC561) the proposed change is not considered b) Application ref 45C353 was approved required to ensure the soundness of the Mr Brian Owen 929 Map30-Newborough Object c) 'Have your say on the Plan' leaflet plan. [3108] states that existing land bank of 26 with an indicative additional of 14 required. is Recommendation this land within the existing land bank Amending the development boundary is figure not considered necessary to ensure the d) Windfall figure of 28 required in soundness of the Plan. Newborough

117 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan.

Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have Land adj Bryn Felin. My client wishes to set out how the Council proposes to include the attached plans into the new manage the delivery of new development deposit plan if possible as land available including details on infrastructure planning. Mr Dafydd Edwards 1019 Map30-Newborough Object for any possible development - I do not The LDP therefore demonstrates how [3118] have the policy numbers of inset map development can be managed, phased and numbers to hand, is it possible to impacts mitigated. It is considered that the complete this section again. LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Land adj Ael-y-Bryn. My client wishes to Not Accepted Mr Dafydd Edwards include the attached plans into the new The representation seeks the inclusion of a 1021 Map30-Newborough Object [3118] deposit plan if possible as land available new site not included within the Deposit for any possible development - I do not Plan. Having considered the policy context,

118 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan have the policy numbers of inset map Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other numbers to hand, is it possible to relevant material factors, it is considered complete this section again. that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan.

Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted Land adj Ty Lawr. My client wishes to The representation seeks the inclusion of a include the attached plans into the new new site not included within the Deposit deposit plan if possible as land available Plan. Having considered the policy context, Mr Dafydd Edwards 1039 Map30-Newborough Object for any possible development - I do not Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other [3118] have the policy numbers of inset map relevant material factors, it is considered numbers to hand, is it possible to that there is no demonstrable need to complete this section again. include the site within the Plan.

119 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Current SA Report on Cae Glas not Not Accepted realistic (see attached matrix) which The representation seeks the inclusion of a shows it should be included within new site not included within the Deposit development boundary. Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other The indicative housing growth predicted relevant material factors, it is considered Mrs Ann Evans of 40 for Newborough is not realistic and that there is no demonstrable need to 1257 Map30-Newborough Object [2781] not flexible to deal with the proposed include the site within the Plan. Wylfa site which will take 10 years to construct and an estimate of 8500 staff Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, will need housing (owned or rented) for supporting text and documentation have the construction phase, with various sites set out how the Council proposes to needed for logistics, transport spin offs. manage the delivery of new development On completion of construction there will including details on infrastructure planning.

120 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan be an estimate of 1000 staff working on The LDP therefore demonstrates how site. development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the Cae Glas has no issues identified in the LDP meets the tests of soundness without Plan and has good access links and should the need for a different approach such as a be accepted within the development new settlement or the suggested boundary irrespective of allocation within alternative site to deliver the identified above housing growth. housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

31) Llannerch-y-medd

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support POLICY TAI16, T57 - Mrs G Griffiths Land near Tyn y I would like to support TAI16 (site T57). 704 Support Recommendation [3043] Ffynnon, This site is suitable for development. Llanerchymedd No Change Note the Support POLICY TAI16, T57 - We support designation T57 and are Mrs H Thomas Land near Tyn y 718 Support happy to offer more land if needed Recommendation [3078] Ffynnon, (SP82). Llanerchymedd No Change POLICY TAI16, T57 - Note the Support Hugh R. Jones I support designation T57 as the land is 722 Land near Tyn y Support [3079] suitable for development. Ffynnon, Recommendation

121 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Llanerchymedd No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks a deletion of a site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an extensive range of supporting evidence that demonstrates the housing requirement over the JLDP period and has also identified the necessary infrastructure Llannerchymedd County Council wishes required to support the development. The to submit the following observations: sites allocated within the plan are Concern regarding site T57 on the map consistent with the overall plan Strategy regarding Llannerchymedd because of and are deliverable within the plan period additional parking and traffic problems - to enable the JLDP to meet the identified Lack of affordable plots in the future for housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. Cyngor Cymdeithas POLICY TAI16, T57 - the young people of our area - Complex Llannerchymedd Land near Tyn y process of finding information regarding Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a 1199 Object (Mrs Sydna Roberts) Ffynnon, the Plan on the Internet or in the suite of policies and supporting text that [2881] Llanerchymedd documents received from the Community explains how development will be Council. It would have been much easier managed within the areas of change, and and more cost effective to send a map of the mechanisms by which the necessary our area for consideration. - As a result infrastructure, services and facilities will be of the above, finding out how to respond secured. This policy framework also to the Plan was not an easy process includes the Councils’ requirement to either. mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

122 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Recommendation It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary

No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * Off-site sewers would be required to Comments Noted connect to the public sewerage network. The Councils will continue to engage with These can be provided through the sewer DCWW at the planning application stage. requisition scheme under Sections 98- POLICY TAI16, T57 - Dwr Cymru Welsh 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. Land near Tyn y Recommendation 1337 Water (Mr Dewi Object * The proposed growth being promoted Ffynnon, No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] for this settlement would require Llanerchymedd matters raised. improvements at Llanerchymedd Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) No Change which would need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. The development boundary around Not Accepted Llanerchymedd has been drawn very The representation seeks the inclusion of a tightly and only one housing new site not included within the Deposit development site has been allocated Plan. Having considered the policy context, within that boundary. An overly Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other M & O Roberts Map 31 - 490 Object restrictive boundary will limit significantly relevant material factors, it is considered [2978] Llanerchymedd the prospects for much needed new that there is no demonstrable need to housing in the village. There is an include the site within the Plan. opportunity to include suitable land to the west of the village, namely site SP431 Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, on the Candidate Site register. supporting text and documentation have

123 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and Enclosed is the LDP plan for Llannerch-y- the proposed change is not considered medd. Would you please include the required to ensure the soundness of the Mr Anthony Lewis Map 31 - area shaded red on the plan. I would plan. 918 Object [3102] Llanerchymedd only require one plot for my daughter and family who would like to return to Recommendation Llannerch-y-medd. Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change Mr Hugh Owen Map 31 - I am resubmitting SP340 but have Not Accepted 997 Object Jones [3156] Llanerchymedd reduced its size from 0.3 The representation seeks the inclusion of a

124 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan 3ha to 0.25ha. I hope you will give the new site not included within the Deposit submission due attention. Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan.

Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change A decision was made to object to the Not Accepted inclusion of SP359 into the Deposit Plan. The representation seeks the inclusion of a The reason for this is Tudor Street is new site not included within the Deposit Thomas Arfon Jones Map 31 - 1106 Object unsuitable for a development of this site. Plan. Having considered the policy context, [2293] Llanerchymedd The Community Council and I have Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other decided to resubmit a smaller piece of relevant material factors, it is considered land (0.5ha) which would be suitable for that there is no demonstrable need to

125 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan 5 dwellings. The road should therefore include the site within the Plan. be suitable . There is water, electric and sewerage connections on site. Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change According to the housing figures for Not Accepted Anglesey the indicative additional The representation seeks the inclusion of a number required for Llanerchymedd is new site not included within the Deposit 22. It appears that SP82 (T57)has been Plan. Having considered the policy context, allocated for affordable housing in part Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Map 31 - only would not be able to sustain the relevant material factors, it is considered 1253 Frank Parry [2287] Object Llanerchymedd building of 22 affordable homes. But that there is no demonstrable need to according to the site register no include the site within the Plan. alternative areas have been allocated. There is therefore no scope to increase Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, the number of houses to 22 in the future. supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to

126 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan I would therefore like you to reconsider manage the delivery of new development SP30 for the additional development including details on infrastructure planning. required as it is in the same area as SP82 The LDP therefore demonstrates how and has good access to the B5112 and is development can be managed, phased and between existing housing. impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change We wish to record our objection to SP30 land adjacent to Pendref, Llanerchymedd. In order to make a new entrance to the site trees would have to be cut down and Not Accepted uprooted and this should not be SP30 has not been included in the Deposit permitted. Plan. Mr /Mrs john Owen Map 31 - 1381 Object Including the site would go against Recommendation [2622] Llanerchymedd highways rules and regulations, which ask No change necessary as the site has not for a distance from the entrance to see been included in the Deposit Plan. clearly the oncoming traffic. There is a hump in the road restricting the view of No Change oncoming traffic from Llanerchymedd and would be a major concern to road safety. Mr Elwyn Schoffield Map 31 - It is considered that there is an over- Not Accepted 1389 Object [3306] Llanerchymedd reliance on windfall sites within the LDP. The representation seeks the inclusion of a

127 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan It is not considered that there is sufficient new site not included within the Deposit landbank within the development Plan. Having considered the policy context, boundary to accommodate the identified Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other windfall need. We wish to propose a site relevant material factors, it is considered adjacent to Eithinog (Site SP 615) to be that there is no demonstrable need to included within the development include the site within the Plan. boundary of Llanerchymedd and allocated for housing. The site would Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, form a reasonable extension to the supporting text and documentation have development boundary to accommodate set out how the Council proposes to the identified housing need. The site is manage the delivery of new development well integrated with and connected to including details on infrastructure planning. the existing pattern of development The LDP therefore demonstrates how along the B5111 and would sensitively development can be managed, phased and infill a small gap between existing impacts mitigated. It is considered that the housing. The site has good connection to LDP meets the tests of soundness without services and is deliverable in the short the need for a different approach such as a term and forms a logical infill which will new settlement or the suggested deliver a modest amount of housing as alternative site to deliver the identified frontage development onto the B5111 housing and employment needs. with a single point of access. Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

32) Bethel (Gwynedd)

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan 94 Mr Steven Burgess POLICY TAI16, T58 - Object We believe that the designated site T58 is Accepted in Part

128 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan & [2699] Land near Saron, too small to accommodate the number of Following another objection to T58 from 996 Bethel, Gwynedd units proposed to Bethel in the Joint LDP. the North Wales Wildlife Trust, we propose We request that the site at the rear of that the allocation is removed from the Capel Bethel be included as a housing Plan. The site has been recognised as a development site within the village in Wildlife Site and following discussions with order to accommodate the future the Council’s Biodiversity officers who housing needs. We request that the consider that the site is of high local village development boundary be biodiversity value and an alternative site extended to include this site. meet the settlement’s demand will need to be identified in Bethel. We wish to change the Joint LDP so that the site at the rear of Capel Bethel be Recommendation included within the village development Delete housing allocation T58. Two boundary as shown on the attached plan alternative sites have been identified that are considered to be more suitable than the land to the rear of Capel Bethel.

Focussed Change NF127,128,129 Comment Noted The site has been recognised as a Wildlife Site and following discussions with the Council’s Biodiversity officers who consider that the site is of high local biodiversity North Wales Wildlife POLICY TAI16, T58 - value and an alternative site meet the 369 Trust (Mr Chris Land near Saron, Object This area includes partof alocalWS settlement’s demand will need to be Wynne) [2626] Bethel, Gwynedd identified in Bethel.

Recommendation Delete housing allocation T58.

Focussed Change NF127,128,129, NF78 POLICY TAI16, T58 - I object to this development, first of all Accepted in Part Owen M Jones 1230 Land near Saron, Object because it is too large. Second of all the Following another objection to T58 from [3286] Bethel, Gwynedd land is higher than the garden which will the North Wales Wildlife Trust, we propose

129 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan affect the privacy of my house. Third of that the allocation is removed from the all I anticipate that there will be a risk of Plan. The site has been recognised as a flooding to the houses that back onto this Wildlife Site and following discussions with land, as nearly every yard of it will be the Council’s Biodiversity officers who covered by concrete or tarmacadam. consider that the site is of high local POLICY TAI16, T58 - 1. Concerns over the boundary wall. biodiversity value and an alternative site Nia Lloyd Griffith 1254 Land near Saron, Object 2. Concerns over flooding if it is not meet the settlement’s demand will need [3287] Bethel, Gwynedd meticulously prepared to be identified in Bethel. 1. Economic factors - the houses currently for sale in the village are not Recommendation selling. To delete housing allocation T58. Two 2. Environmental factors - public footpath alternative sites have been identified that runs through the site and history of will meet the housing needs of Bethel. flooding and the impact on adjoining houses. T58 is likely to exacerbate the Focussed Change NF127,128,129, NF78 POLICY TAI16, T58 - problem. 1256 Hefin Evans [3288] Land near Saron, Object Both factors are essential and highlight Bethel, Gwynedd the fact that the site is totally unsuitable. Smaller sites should be considered and sites that are less intrusive. T58 abuts too much on open countryside. Consideration must be given to sites that extend existing development and are not likely to create a detrimental environmental impact. * I am unware of any proof that there is Accepted in Part need for further house-building in Bethel. Following another objection to T58 from * There are 'empty' plots on Stad Bro the North Wales Wildlife Trust, we propose POLICY TAI16, T58 - Eglwys ready for development. that the allocation is removed from the Dr J Elwyn Hughes, 1391 Land near Saron, Object * Building more houses could attract non Plan. The site has been recognised as a MA. [3308] Bethel, Gwynedd Welsh-speakers, thus eroding the 'old Wildlife Site and following discussions with Welsh way of life', anglicizing the area, the Council’s Biodiversity officers who and contributing towards destroying our consider that the site is of high local language and culture. biodiversity value and an alternative site

130 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Adding another entrance/exit to the meet the settlement’s demand will need B4366 would create an additional flow of to be identified in Bethel. traffic, already comprising heavy lorries and farm vehicles, thus causing further Recommendation problems and dangers on a road which is To delete housing allocation T58. Two already constantly busy. alternative sites have been identified that * Any kind of development on the will meet the housing needs of Bethel.. No proposed site would affect the present robust evidence was submitted to suggest unadulterated scenery. amending the housing figure for bethel. Discussions with residents have drawn my attention to the following: Focussed Change NF127,128,129 * Robust evidence required via a detailed study under the Council's supervision to demonstrate that drainage and sewerage POLICY TAI16, T58 - problems can be overcome, particularly Cyng/Counc Sion 1456 Land near Saron, Object from the perspective of Saron's residents Jones [308] Bethel, Gwynedd who are near the proposed site; * Full consideration needs to be given to views from nearby properties; * Need to ensure that Saron's residents have a new access and parking spaces in order to tackle the parking situation. There is no need for more housing in the village. One estate remains unfinished, POLICY TAI16, T58 - that is Bro Eglwys. There are sewerage 1458 Dilwyn Jones [3356] Land near Saron, Object problems and the school is too small to Bethel, Gwynedd accept more children. And what will happen to the bus stop by the gate, - a lot of people and children use this bus! * A water supply can be provided toserve Comments Noted Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T58 - this site. The Councils will continue to engage with 1338 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Saron, Object * The foul flows would lead to Bethel DCWW at the planning application stage. Griffiths ) [2680] Bethel, Gwynedd Sewage Pumping Station (SPS) and an assessment of this SPS may be needed to Recommendation

131 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan establish whether the flows can be No change is required to address the accommodated or whether matters raised. improvements to the SPS will be required to allow development to proceed. No Change * The proposed growth being promoted for this settlement would require improvements at Treborth Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. Accepted Following another objection to T58 from There are no physical obstructions to the North Wales Wildlife Trust, we propose developing the site and it is less visible that the allocation is removed from the than the designated site T58. It is better Plan. The site has been recognised as a in a relatively small village to have a Wildlife Site and following discussions with greater variety of sites for smaller local the Council’s Biodiversity officers who developers. This would be more consider that the site is of high local sustainable and would improve the biodiversity value and an alternative site Mr Sam Davies Map 32 - Bethel, operational chances of the Plan to realise 1004 Object meet the settlement’s demand will need [3160] Gwynedd the spatial strategy and to provide the to be identified in Bethel. housing numbers. There are no negative impacts deriving from the site's Recommendation Sustainability Appraisal. Delete housing allocation T58. Two alternative sites have been identified to That site SP 282 is designated and that meet the housing needs of Bethel including site T58 is reduced to accommodate this site. approximately 20 houses. Focussed Change NF127,129, NF78 I have submitted an application for a new Accepted in Part Mr Dafydd Hughes Map 32 - Bethel, access into Tŷ'n Rhos; the reason is Following another objection to T58 from 1008 Object [185] Gwynedd because I need to undertake work on the the North Wales Wildlife Trust, we propose house, and it needs to be wide enough to that the allocation is removed from the

132 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan bring lorries/vans and trailers up to the Plan. The site has been recognised as a house. Wildlife Site and following discussions with the Council’s Biodiversity officers who I have received a letter from the Council consider that the site is of high local noting that I cannot build on the land of biodiversity value and an alternative site Tŷ'n Rhos. I never asked for permission to meet the settlement’s demand will need build on the land, but, as I have been to be identified in Bethel. given this information, I would like to know why? The Council refuses Recommendation permission to build on land in the centre Delete housing allocation T58. Two of the village, and then decides to build alternative sites have been identified that houses on the outskirts (T58). I would like are considered to be more suitable than to know, where is the sense in this? If I the land submitted. were to submit an application for building, at most, I would only permit 6 Focussed Change NF127,128,129 houses. We support including site LS029 in the Local Development Plan. The site is ideal for development due to its location as a gap site. The land has been developed in the past with the installation of above ground sewage pipes, therefore it is currently a brownfield site, not a site in open countryside. The proposed Map 32 - Bethel, development would comply with the 1009 Olwen Davies [3163] Object Gwynedd Council's main policies including creating affordable housing, creating a house as high quality accommodation for tourists, improving the environment through suitable design and using appropriate materials from the area, assisting the Welsh language and culture, energy efficiency etc.

133 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Include LS029 (Land at Tŷ Cerrig) in the Plan as a suitable site for development. Bethel is served by Malltraeth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 32 - Bethel, 1189 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Gwynedd Griffiths ) [2680] from the growth figure allocated for the catchment area. No Change I would like to see the surface area of designation T58 reduced for around 20 Accepted in Part units, and an alternative site designated Following another objection to T58 from opposite the Rhoslan Estate with around the North Wales Wildlife Trust, we propose 20 units (site SP282). that the allocation is removed from the Plan. The site has been recognised as a I object due to the fact that the site is too Wildlife Site and following discussions with large for the village and more choice of the Council’s Biodiversity officers who sites in the village is needed to ensure consider that the site is of high local that the relevant development occurs biodiversity value and an alternative site Mr Sam Davies Map 32 - Bethel, 1289 Object within the life of the plan. The Bro Eglwys meet the settlement’s demand will need [3160] Gwynedd development for 48 dwellings has to be identified in Bethel. commenced since 1985 and still is not complete. This shows that the market for Recommendation large sites does not exist. Delete housing allocation T58. Two alternative sites have been identified that The designation is not realistic therefore, are considered to be more suitable than given the alternative sites available that the land submitted. were considered in Background Paper 1A. This undermines the robustness of the Focussed Change NF127,129 plan under CE2. Accepted in Part Ty Cerrig, Bethel (LS029) - I have met the Following another objection to T58 from owners of this land and I don't have any Cyng/Counc Sion Map 32 - Bethel, the North Wales Wildlife Trust, we propose 1457 Object objections to the proposal. Therefore I Jones [308] Gwynedd that the allocation is removed from the would appreciate if the matter can be Plan. The site has been recognised as a reconsidered. Wildlife Site and following discussions with

134 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the Council’s Biodiversity officers who consider that the site is of high local biodiversity value and an alternative site meet the settlement’s demand will need to be identified in Bethel.

Recommendation Delete housing allocation T58. Two alternative sites have been identified that are considered to be more suitable than the land submitted.

Focussed Change NF127,128,129

33) Bontnewydd

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T59 - * This site has planning permission as 1339 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Glanrafon Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Estate, Bontnewydd make. No Change The proposed allocation of circa 10 residential units on site T60 is supported for the following reasons: Note the Support POLICY TAI16, T60 - - Deliverability - positive planning Lord Newborough 1281 Land near Pont Glan Support - Allocated housing numbers Recommendation [3187] Beuno, Bontnewydd - Development principle - Opportunities and Constraints (App 1) No Change - Indicative Masterplan (App 2) - Positive Sustainability Appraisal 1340 Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T60 - Object * A water supply can be provided to serve Comments Noted

135 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Water (Mr Dewi Land near Pont Glan this site. The Councils will continue to engage with Griffiths ) [2680] Beuno, Bontnewydd * Off-site sewers would be required to DCWW at the planning application stage. connect to the public sewerage network. These can be provided through the sewer Recommendation requisition scheme under Sections 98- No change is required to address the 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. matters raised. * The proposed growth being promoted for this settlement would require No Change improvements at Llanfaglan Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. Not Accepted Land adjacent to Pont Glan Beuno (T60) The representation seeks the inclusion of a has been allocated within Bontnewydd new site not included within the Deposit for housing. It is not considered that this Plan. Having considered the policy context, site is the best site for housing allocation Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other to accommodate the identified housing relevant material factors, it is considered need for Bontnewydd. We wish to that there is no demonstrable need to propose a site at Ceirw to be included include the site within the Plan. within the development boundary for Bontnewydd for allocation of housing. It Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Mr Huw M Jones 980 Map33-Bontnewydd Object is considered that the site would form a supporting text and documentation have [3145] natural and modest extension to the set out how the Council proposes to development boundary of Bontnewydd manage the delivery of new development without resulting in a sporadic intrusion including details on infrastructure planning. into the countryside. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and We wish to seek that the land allocated impacts mitigated. It is considered that the for housing within Bontnewydd be LDP meets the tests of soundness without reviewed and altered to include land at the need for a different approach such as a Ceirw. new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified

136 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to To include the land within the plan as a include the site within the Plan. petrol station and associated business uses along with a caravan site on the Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, remainder of the site. The new supporting text and documentation have Bontnewydd/Caernarfon road will open set out how the Council proposes to this land up for this use and there are no manage the delivery of new development 982 Joe Brown [3146] Map 33 - Bontnewydd Object stations on the roadside for 10 miles in including details on infrastructure planning. both direction. Suitable land for this use The LDP therefore demonstrates how and no flood risk. development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the Allocate land for use as a petrol station LDP meets the tests of soundness without and holiday site. the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the

137 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

34) Botwnnog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Re: T61: Cefn Capel, Botwnnog: Agree with this potential site. Central to the village, direct access from the site either to the B4413 highway or to a quieter Note the Support POLICY TAI16, T61 - road before joining the B4413. A footpath Mr Geraint Evans 476 Land near Cefn Capel, Support already exists from this site all the way to Recommendation [2962] Botwnnog the centre of the village to the services. Botwnnog is a village which services No Change through two schools, a central Pen Llyn surgery, Congl y Meinciau Business Park, phone exchange etc. * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * Off-site sewers would be required to connect to the public sewerage network. Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T61 - These can be provided through the sewer 1341 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Cefn Capel, Support requisition scheme under Sections 98- Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Botwnnog 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. * Botwnnog Wastewater Treatment No Change Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T62 - * A water supply can be provided to serve Note the Support 1342 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Pentre, Support this site. Griffiths ) [2680] Botwnnog * Off-site sewers would be required to Recommendation

138 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan connect to the public sewerage network. These can be provided through the sewer No Change requisition scheme under Sections 98- 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. * Botwnnog Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area.

35) Chwilog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The representation seeks a deletion of a site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an extensive range of supporting evidence that demonstrates the housing requirement over the JLDP period and has Delete Allocation T63 as this is now a also identified the necessary infrastructure committed Site with planning approval POLICY TAI16, T63 - required to support the development. The WYG/Alliance (April 2015) for 15 homes and allocated Land to rear of sites allocated within the plan are 382 Planning (Mr Mark Object the adjacent land to the south for future Madryn Arms, consistent with the overall plan Strategy Walton) [2905] housing. Chwilog and are deliverable within the plan period to enable the JLDP to meet the identified Amend indicative growth levels to 10-30 housing needs of the plan area up to 2026.

Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a suite of policies and supporting text that explains how development will be managed within the areas of change, and the mechanisms by which the necessary

139 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan infrastructure, services and facilities will be secured. This policy framework also includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site. Therefore, the proposed change is not considered necessary

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other POLICY TAI16, T63 - relevant material factors, it is considered WYG/Alliance Land to rear of Extend allocation T63 to include land to that there is no demonstrable need to 441 Planning (Mr Mark Object Madryn Arms, the south of the proposed allocation. include the site within the Plan. Walton) [2905] Chwilog Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning.

140 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion/extension of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * Off-site sewers would be required to connect to the public sewerage network. Note the Support POLICY TAI16, T63 - Dwr Cymru Welsh These can be provided through the sewer Land to rear of 1343 Water (Mr Dewi Support requisition scheme under Sections 98- Recommendation Madryn Arms, Griffiths ) [2680] 101 of the Water Industry Act 1991. Chwilog * Chwilog Wastewater Treatment Works No Change (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Site allocation T63 already granted Not Accepted planning permission and therefore The representation seeks the inclusion of a POLICY TAI16, T63 - allocation should be deleted as it no new site not included within the Deposit Admiral Taverns Land to rear of longer comprises an allocation, but a Plan. Having considered the policy context, 1409 Object [3348] Madryn Arms, committed site. Similarly T64 is highly Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Chwilog likely to be granted planning during 2015. relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to Policy TAI (i) envisages that both include the site within the Plan.

141 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan allocations T63 and T64 will deliver 38 units where in fact will only bring forward Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, 32 leaving a shortfall of 7 units. The supporting text and documentation have Service Village has limited previously set out how the Council proposes to developed land opportunities available manage the delivery of new development within the proposed development including details on infrastructure planning. boundary and shortfall will need to be The LDP therefore demonstrates how accommodated on suitable adjacent land development can be managed, phased and to the development boundary. Given the impacts mitigated. It is considered that the two allocations will have most likely been LDP meets the tests of soundness without consented in 2015 the Deposit Plan is the need for a different approach such as a unrealistic in assuming that the Service new settlement or the suggested Village will not deliver further housing alternative site to deliver the identified for the remainder of the plan period. Will housing and employment needs. impact on the viability of existing community facilities. Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not Proposed a further allocation of land for considered necessary to ensure the residential use to the south of T63 which soundness of the JLDP. is a logical and definable boundary to the Village. No Change Site allocation T63 already granted planning permission and therefore allocation should be deleted as it no longer comprises an allocation, but a committed site. Similarly T64 is highly POLICY TAI16, T63 - likely to be granted planning during 2015. Admiral Taverns Land to rear of 1410 Object [3348] Madryn Arms, Policy TAI (i) envisages that both Chwilog allocations T63 and T64 will deliver 38 units where in fact will only bring forward 32 leaving a shortfall of 7 units. The Service Village has limited previously developed land opportunities available

142 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan within the proposed development boundary and shortfall will need to be accommodated on suitable adjacent land to the development boundary. Given the two allocations will have most likely been consented in 2015 the Deposit Plan is unrealistic in assuming that the Service Village will not deliver further housing for the remainder of the plan period. Will impact on the viability of existing community facilities.

Proposed a further allocation of land for residential use to the south of T63 which is a logical and definable boundary to the Village. * Potential developers need to be aware that this site is crossed by water main and protection measures in the form of easement widths or a diversion of the pipe would be required, which may Note the Support impact upon the density achievable on Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T64 - site. 1348 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Cae Capel, Support Recommendation * The public sewerage network can Griffiths ) [2680] Chwilog accept the potential foul flows from the No Change proposed development site. * Chwilog Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Council for the Why has a 0.7 ha GUDP site near Ty'n Not Accepted Protection of Rural Rhos estate on the northern side of the The representation seeks the inclusion of a 667 Map 35 - Chwilog Object Wales (Mr Noel village been deleted and the boundary new site not included within the Deposit Davey) [1169] redrawn to exclude the area? The old Plan. Having considered the policy context,

143 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Afon Wen laundry site was safeguarded Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other as a redevelopment site in the GUDP but relevant material factors, it is considered is not included in the JLDP. A proposal for that there is no demonstrable need to 13 houses was refused here in 2014 include the site within the Plan. mainly because it was not allocated for housing. It is proposed for housing in the Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, CSR (SP839). It is close to the main road supporting text and documentation have and the new laundry premises. The site is set out how the Council proposes to a derelict eyesore and urgently needs manage the delivery of new development redevelopment. including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change The current deposit plan omits Not Accepted approximately 1.7 acres of unused land The representation seeks the inclusion of a to the rear of our property (Brookside, new site not included within the Deposit Madryn Terrace) which is ideally suited Plan. Having considered the policy context, Ms Daphne Marini 1023 Map 35 - Chwilog Object for new build residences, community Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other [326] parking space (either for residents and or relevant material factors, it is considered public in general) or light commercial that there is no demonstrable need to development and is positioned within include the site within the Plan. easy access of the centre of the village, its

144 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan amenities, recreational facilities and a Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, public transport node. Our suggested supporting text and documentation have changes to the 2015 Deposit Plan align set out how the Council proposes to with the objectives of the Sustainability manage the delivery of new development Appraisal report and would significantly including details on infrastructure planning. support a number of the SA objectives in The LDP therefore demonstrates how particular 2/3/6/7/10 whilst incurring development can be managed, phased and none of the negative outcomes impacts mitigated. It is considered that the mentioned therein. LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Why has the 0.7ha GUDP site near the Not Accepted Ty'n Rhos estate on the northern side of The representation seeks the inclusion of a the village been deleted and the new site not included within the Deposit boundary redrawn to exclude the area? Plan. Having considered the policy context, The old Afon Wen laundry site was Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Council for the safeguarded as a redevelopment site in relevant material factors, it is considered Protection of Rural the GUDP but not included in the JLDP. A that there is no demonstrable need to 1255 Map 35 - Chwilog Object Wales (Mr Noel proposal for 13 houses was refused here include the site within the Plan. Davey) [1169] in 2014 mainly because it was not allocated for housing. It is proposed for Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, housing in the CSR (SP839). Although the supporting text and documentation have site is well outside the Chwilog village set out how the Council proposes to boundary, it is close to the main road and manage the delivery of new development the new laundry premises. The site is a including details on infrastructure planning.

145 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan derelict eyesore and urgently needs The LDP therefore demonstrates how redevelopment. We would advocate development can be managed, phased and flexible treatment in respect of its re-use. impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

36) Deiniolen

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T65 - * This site has planning permission as 1349 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Pentre Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Helen, Deiniolen make. No Change

37) Rachub

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Council for the POLICY TAI16, T66 - We have no objection to the site Note the Support 521 Support Protection of Rural Land near Maes identified in Rachub (T66).

146 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Wales (Mr Noel Bleddyn, Rachub Recommendation Davey) [1169] No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. * Potential developers need to be aware that this site is crossed by a sewer and Comments Noted protection measures in the form of The Councils will continue to engage with easement widths or a diversion of the DCWW at the planning application stage. pipe would be required, which may Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T66 - impact upon the housing density Recommendation 1350 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Maes Object achievable on site. No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Bleddyn, Rachub * The proposed growth being promoted matters raised. for this settlement would require improvements at Bethesda Wastewater No Change Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions.

38) Tremadog • No Representations

39) Y Ffôr

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a Cyngor Cymuned POLICY TAI16, T67 - If application C14/0999/40/LL is new site not included within the Deposit 1344 Llannor (Mr Haydn Land near Tyn Lôn, Y Object successful, there is no need to include Plan. Having considered the policy context, Jones) [1549] Ffor T67 in the plan. Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered

147 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan.

Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, supporting text and documentation have set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve Comments Noted this site. The Councils will continue to engage with * The public sewerage network can DCWW at the planning application stage. accept the potential foul flows from the Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T67 - proposed development site. Recommendation 1351 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Tyn Lôn, Y Object * The proposed growth being promoted No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Ffor for this settlement would require matters raised. improvements at Y Ffor Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) which would No Change need to be funded through our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier

148 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan through developer contributions. Not Accepted The representation seeks a deletion of a site within the Deposit Plan. In preparing the Deposit Plan, the JPPU collated an extensive range of supporting evidence that demonstrates the housing requirement over the JLDP period and has also identified the necessary infrastructure required to support the development. The sites allocated within the plan are consistent with the overall plan Strategy The location of T68, the current site for and are deliverable within the plan period Ysgol Hafod Lon has been included in the to enable the JLDP to meet the identified deposit plan. The members do not housing needs of the plan area up to 2026. support this. In a public meeting that Furthermore, the Deposit Plan contains a Cyngor Cymuned POLICY TAI16, T68 - was organised many years ago by suite of policies and supporting text that 1181 Llannor (Mr Haydn Land near the School, Object Gwynedd Council, it was agreed that explains how development will be Jones) [1549] Y Ffor consideration would be given to using the managed within the areas of change, and site as a car park for the village of Y Ffor. the mechanisms by which the necessary infrastructure, services and facilities will be The members would like to see T68 secured. This policy framework also removed from the plan. includes the Councils’ requirement to mitigate potential impacts of development in relation to enhancing and protecting the natural and built environment, provision of sustainable transport, community facilities, environmental assets and the careful management of development in environmentally sensitive areas or rural locations.

Recommendation

149 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan It is considered that the JLDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for the removal of the site.

No Change * A water supply can be provided to serve this site. Comments Noted * The public sewerage network can The Councils will continue to engage with accept the potential foul flows from the DCWW at the planning application stage. proposed development site. Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T68 - * The proposed growth being promoted Recommendation 1352 Water (Mr Dewi Land near the School, Object for this settlement would require No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] Y Ffor improvements at Y Ffor Wastewater matters raised. Treatment Works (WwTW) which would need to be funded through our Asset No Change Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh POLICY TAI16, T69 - * This site has planning permission as 1353 Water (Mr Dewi Land near Bro Gwystil, Support such we have no further comment to Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] Y Ffor make. No Change We support development of housing and Not Accepted employment sites on suitable sites in the The representation seeks the inclusion of a Service Village of Y Ffôr. The settlement new site not included within the Deposit offers scope for expansion as a self- Plan. Having considered the policy context, Council for the contained residential and employment Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Protection of Rural centre within easy access of the urban relevant material factors, it is considered 720 Map39 -YFfôr Object Wales (Mr Noel services of Pwllheli. We support the two that there is no demonstrable need to Davey) [1169] housing land proposals T67 and T68, as include the site within the Plan. well as C10 which is proposed for employment land. We note that the Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, housing site near Hafod Lôn has been supporting text and documentation have deleted, We do not see the logic of this set out how the Council proposes to

150 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan and would argue for reinstatement and manage the delivery of new development use of this site for housing. including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how development can be managed, phased and impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation: The inclusion of the alternative site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP. Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit We support development of housing and Plan. Having considered the policy context, employment sites on suitable sites in the Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other Service Village of Y Ffôr. The settlement relevant material factors, it is considered offers scope for expansion as a self- that there is no demonstrable need to contained residential and employment include the site within the Plan. Council for the centre within easy access of the urban Protection of Rural services of Pwllheli. We support the two 721 Map39 -YFfôr Object Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, Wales (Mr Noel housing land proposals T67 and T68, as supporting text and documentation have Davey) [1169] well as C10 which is proposed for set out how the Council proposes to employment land. We note that the manage the delivery of new development housing site near Hafod Lôn has been including details on infrastructure planning. deleted, We do not see the logic of this The LDP therefore demonstrates how and would argue for reinstatement and development can be managed, phased and use of this site for housing. impacts mitigated. It is considered that the LDP meets the tests of soundness without the need for a different approach such as a

151 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a The proposed allocation of circa 18 new site not included within the Deposit residential units on Site T67 (Land near Plan. Having considered the policy context, Tyn Lôn) Y Ffôr is supported for the Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other following reasons: relevant material factors, it is considered Deliverability - Positive Planning. that there is no demonstrable need to Allocated Housing Numbers include the site within the Plan. Development Principle Opportunities and Constraints - As Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, attached at Appendix 1 supporting text and documentation have Lord Newborough Indicative Masterplan - As attached at set out how the Council proposes to 1037 Map39 -YFfôr Object [3187] Appendix 2 manage the delivery of new development Positive Sustainability Appraisal including details on infrastructure planning. The LDP therefore demonstrates how An additional site opposite Site T68 (land development can be managed, phased and near the School) has also been put impacts mitigated. It is considered that the forward for consideration as indicated on LDP meets the tests of soundness without the Opportunities and Constraints Plan. A the need for a different approach such as a Sustainability Appraisal has been carried new settlement or the suggested out and is included in the supporting alternative site to deliver the identified documentation. housing and employment needs.

Recommendation

152 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered The Plan provides an indicative figure that there is no demonstrable need to that 40 houses are needed in Ffôr include the site within the Plan. between 2011 and 2026. Planning permission has already been granted for Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, nine houses which reduces the need to supporting text and documentation have 31 houses. set out how the Council proposes to manage the delivery of new development Planning application C14/0999/40Ll has Cyngor Cymuned including details on infrastructure planning. been submitted (but not determined) on 1038 Llannor (Mr Haydn Map39 -YFfôr Object The LDP therefore demonstrates how the site for 40 houses. Land is in the Jones) [1549] development can be managed, phased and previous Plan and the Community Council impacts mitigated. It is considered that the is concerned that it is not included in the LDP meets the tests of soundness without new plan. The Community Council the need for a different approach such as a supports this application. It does not new settlement or the suggested support location T68. alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs. Include the site of planning application C14/0999 in the new deposit plan. Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

153 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The representation seeks the inclusion of a new site not included within the Deposit Plan. Having considered the policy context, Plan strategy, the JLDP provision, and other relevant material factors, it is considered that there is no demonstrable need to include the site within the Plan.

Furthermore, the Plan’s policies, We note that the GUDP housing site near supporting text and documentation have Hafod Lôn has been deleted from the set out how the Council proposes to GUDP, although it is the subject of a manage the delivery of new development Council for the pending outline application for 40 including details on infrastructure planning. Protection of Rural housing units (C14/0999/40/AM), while 1116 Map39 -YFfôr Object The LDP therefore demonstrates how Wales (Mr Noel the proposed village development development can be managed, phased and Davey) [1169] boundary has been redrawn to exclude impacts mitigated. It is considered that the this area. We do not see the logic of this LDP meets the tests of soundness without and would argue for reinstatement and the need for a different approach such as a use of this site for housing. new settlement or the suggested alternative site to deliver the identified housing and employment needs.

Recommendation The inclusion of the site is therefore not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the JLDP.

No Change

154 LOCAL VILLAGES

40) Bethel (Anglesey)

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted To extend Bethel's development It is considered that the Deposit Plan boundary to include land shown on identifies sufficient, deliverable and attached map to allow a dwelling for a appropriate housing land in the area and local person. the proposed change is not considered The site is located on a former quarry and required to ensure the soundness of the is classified as brownfield land. Map 40 - Bethel (Ynys plan. 914 Ceri Pritchard [3098] Object The site can be accessed from the main Môn) road. Recommendation The site itself is level, not at risk of Amending the development boundary is flooding or surface water problems. not considered necessary to ensure the Development of the site would not lead soundness of the Plan. to a loss of trees and hedgerows. Utilities are directly on site. No Change Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and the proposed change is not considered My client wishes to include the attached required to ensure the soundness of the Iolo Owen & Co Map 40 - Bethel (Ynys plans into the new deposit plan if plan. 1396 Object [2237] Môn) possible as land available for any possible development. Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change

155 41) Bodffordd

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and the proposed change is not considered My client wishes to include the attached required to ensure the soundness of the Iolo Owen & Co plans into the new deposit plan if plan. 933 Map41-Bodffordd Object [2237] possible as land available for any possible development Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and the proposed change is not considered My client wishes to include the attached required to ensure the soundness of the Iolo Owen & Co plans into the new deposit plan if plan. 934 Map41-Bodffordd Object [2237] possible as land available for any possible development Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change The proposed growth being promoted for Comments Noted Dwr Cymru Welsh this settlement would require The Councils will continue to engage with 1190 Water (Mr Dewi Map41-Bodffordd Object improvements at Bodffordd Wastewater DCWW at the planning application stage. Griffiths ) [2680] Treatment Works (WwTW) which would

156 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan need to be funded through our Asset Recommendation Management Plan or potentially earlier No change is required to address the through developer contributions. matters raised.

No Change

42) Bryngwran

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and The site in question already has planning appropriate housing land in the area and approval for one plot (given on appeal the proposed change is not considered APP/L6805/A/2195898 20/09/13). The required to ensure the soundness of the Mr Gwyn Williams inspector deemed the site suitable for an plan. 935 Map42–Bryngwran Object [3119] infill site within the village of Bryngwran. Recommendation We wish you to look favourably for one Amending the development boundary is more building plot on this site. not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Bryngwran as the indicative housing 1191 Water (Mr Dewi Map42-Bryngwran Support Recommendation growth is provided for by completed Griffiths ) [2680] units and the existing landbank. No Change

157 43) Brynsiencyn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan I am objecting to the proposed inclusion Not Accepted within the Brynsiencyn village boundary Development boundaries have been drawn of the field bounded by properties in Lôn around villages to ensure sufficient Uchaf and Ty'n y Bryn. I am objecting on opportunities exist for settlements within the grounds that this is prime, the plan. The suitability or otherwise of agricultural land that is currently in use parcels of land within a development for grazing and free-range poultry. There boundary will be considered at the Mrs Rosamund are other sites available for potential planning application stage. 386 Map43-Brynsiencyn Object James [2726] housing development that are currently neither used nor maintained. Land at Merddyn Gwyn has had the benefit I am also objecting on grounds of of planning permission for a number of increased traffic, insufficient capacity in years but has not been developed to date. the sewerage system, adverse effect on In the 2014 Joint Housing Land Availability wildlife, and basic lack of facilities within Study this site was outside the 5 year land the village to support current population, supply due to the length of time it has had never mind an increase. permission. In fact Table 3 in Appendix 5 of Objecting on the grounds that this is the Deposit Plan identifies a number of prime, agricultural land. There are other units from the land bank which are unlikely non-agricultural sites available? I refer to be completed and the 13 for specifically to land at Ty'n y Brynsiencyn are the Merddyn Gwyn site. Cwrt/Merddyn Gwyn Other considerations are that it would The Highways Dept has not objected to the bring an unwelcome increase in traffic settlement’s development boundary. Mr Dave Shone and I have it on authority that the 1405 Map43-Brynsiencyn Object [3347] present sewerage system is near capacity Recommendation and might not be able to cope with any Amending the development boundary is further load. not considered necessary to ensure the Also objecting to this proposal on soundness of the Plan. environmental grounds. It would also destroy the open aspect currently No Change enjoyed by local residents. An increase in intensive urbanization of Brynsiencyn will

158 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan ultimately result in the loss of village character.

I would like the field bounded by properties in Lôn Uchaf and Ty'n y Bryn to remain outside the village boundary, so that it can't be used for building development. Remove filed marked A on the map from the development boundary: i) We believe that the sewerage treatment works would not be able to cope with the development ii) Access to the field is poor because it Cyngor Cymuned would lead to traffic going through 924 Llanidan (Mr ME Map43-Brynsiencyn Object existing estates to reach the site. Jones) [1392] As a way forward the Community Council would like to see the filed marked B on the map included within the development boundary because this site benefits from existing planning permission. Note the Support Brynsiencyn Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1192 Water (Mr Dewi Map43 -Brynsiencyn Support Recommendation foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

44) Caergeiliog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan

159 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan I object to the plan on the basis that the development boundary for Caergeiliog should include my alternative site. Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan The site is located in the centre of the identifies sufficient, deliverable and village opposite a housing estate which appropriate housing land in the area and means that infrastructure such as the proposed change is not considered sewerage and water and electricity required to ensure the soundness of the Mr HR Michael supply are located convenient to the site. plan. 1110 Map44-Caergeiliog Object [3232] A lack of affordable housing exists in the Recommendation settlement and I note from the document Amending the development boundary is that more houses are required and I not considered necessary to ensure the believe that it is essentially important in soundness of the Plan. terms of sustainable Welsh communities that the provision of affordable houses is No Change sufficient for the needs of local people who want to remain in their localities. The development boundary for Not Accepted Caergeiliog, which currently excludes this The Deposit Plan recognises a hierarchy of site, should be amended to include it and towns and villages which have a specific the land should be designated as a role and function. Within Topic Paper 5 – housing allocation with planning Developing the Settlement Strategy a permission to correctly reflect the land's methodology was developed and published status as a committed site for to recognise these settlements on the basis Mr Selwyn Owen development of 69 dwellings and 4 flats. of their role, function, range of facilities 1117 Map44-Caergeiliog Object [3233] and services. In Appendix 5, the removal of the reference to 73 units in Caergeiliog in the The spatial strategy will ensure that table of sites within Ynys Môn which are development is targeted to locations which unlikely to be developed during the Plan are sustainable in terms of size, role, period. character, facilities, transport links, social inclusion and environment. Therefore, The addition of these 73 units into the there will be a sustainable pattern of

160 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan figure for the number of units with communities which have a viable permission in the villages section of table community. 18 and a corresponding reduction in the figure for the additional number of Distributing further growth to villages and dwelling unites required. clusters beyond what has currently been recognised in Policy PS15 without robust evidence to do so would undermine the spatial strategy and the sustainability principles which the Plan is based upon.

Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that, depending on the location of the Comment Noted development, may need to be resolved to allow development to proceed. Potential Recommendation Dwr Cymru Welsh developers can either wait for DCWW to The Councils will continue to have ongoing 1193 Water (Mr Dewi Map44-Caergeiliog Object resolve the flooding, subject to funding discussions with DCWW on the matters Griffiths ) [2680] being approved by our regulator Ofwat, raised. or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of No Change the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Caergeiliog is served by Holyhead Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1194 Water (Mr Dewi Map44-Caergeiliog Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

161 45) Dwyran

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan There are isolated incidents of flooding in Comments Noted the public sewerage system that, The Councils will continue to engage with depending on the location of the DCWW at the planning application stage. development, may need to be resolved to allow development to proceed. Potential Dwr Cymru Welsh Recommendation developers can either wait for DCWW to 1195 Water (Mr Dewi Map 45 - Dwyran Object No change is required to address the resolve the flooding, subject to funding Griffiths ) [2680] matters raised. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through No Change the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of No Change the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Dwyran is served by Newborough Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1196 Water (Mr Dewi Map 45 - Dwyran Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

46) Llandegfan

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that, depending on the location of the Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh development, may need to be resolved to 1197 Water (Mr Dewi Map46-Llandegfan Support allow development to proceed. Potential Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] developers can either wait for DCWW to resolve the flooding, subject to funding No Change being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through

162 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Comments Noted The total growth being promoted within The Councils will continue to engage with the catchment area of Treborth DCWW at the planning application stage. Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Dwr Cymru Welsh would necessitate improvements to the Recommendation 1198 Water (Mr Dewi Map46-Llandegfan Object treatment works which would need to be No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] funded through our Asset Management matters raised. Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

Not Accepted The Deposit Plan recognises a hierarchy of towns and villages which have a specific role and function. Within Topic Paper 5 – Developing the Settlement Strategy a methodology was developed and published to recognise these settlements on the basis Land should be allocated for housing to of their role, function, range of facilities accommodate the identified housing and services. need. Mrs Mary Davidson 1797 Map46-Llandegfan Object The spatial strategy will ensure that [3359] We wish to seek that our site adjacent to development is targeted to locations which Gwel y Llan Estate should be included are sustainable in terms of size, role, within the development boundary of character, facilities, transport links, social Llandegfan and allocated for housing. inclusion and environment. Therefore, there will be a sustainable pattern of communities which have a viable community.

Distributing further growth to villages and clusters beyond what has currently been

163 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan recognised in Policy PS15 without robust evidence to do so would undermine the spatial strategy and the sustainability principles which the Plan is based upon.

Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change

47) Llanddaniel Fab

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and the proposed change is not considered required to ensure the soundness of the Please include my land in the Joint Local Carolyn Watcyn Map 47 - Llanddaniel plan. 967 Object Development Plan for reasons shown on [2216] Fab the attachments. Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change 1) Llanddaniel is a local village listed in Not Accepted Map 47 - Llanddaniel table 20 and is therefore under policy It is considered that the Deposit Plan 968 WGDavies[2218] Object Fab TAI17 identifies sufficient, deliverable and 2) The site shown on the candidate site appropriate housing land in the area and

164 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan register attached is in the village the proposed change is not considered boundary and is considered to meet required to ensure the soundness of the criteria in TAI17 plan. 3) Current proposals to extend Ysgol Parc y Bont and the creation of a science park Recommendation in nearby Gaerwen will increase the Amending the development boundary is demand for local homes. The provision not considered necessary to ensure the therefore requires amendment. soundness of the Plan.

Include site SP769 in the new Local No Change Development Plan. 1) Llanddaniel is listed in table 20 as a Not Accepted local village and is therefore under policy It is considered that the Deposit Plan TAI17. identifies sufficient, deliverable and 2) The sites shown on the candidate sites appropriate housing land in the area and register attached are infill sites within the the proposed change is not considered village area which will meet the criteria in required to ensure the soundness of the TAI17 Map 47 - Llanddaniel plan. 991 WGDavies[2218] Object 3) Current proposals to amalgamate Ysgol Fab Parc y Bont and Llangaffo, the demand by Recommendation local welsh families will increase, thus Amending the development boundary is provision requires amendment. not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan. Include the parcels of land (identified as SP123 on the Candidate Site Register) in No Change the new Local Development Plan. Llanddaniel Fab is served by Gaerwen Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 47 - Llanddaniel 1202 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Fab Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

165 48) Llanfachraeth

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Llanfachraeth Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 48 - Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1203 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Llanfachraeth foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

49) Llanfaethlu

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan We wish to object to the Deposit Local Development Plan's boundary for Llanfaethlu. The inclusion of the land to Not Accepted the north of Bryn Llwyd Estate would It is considered that the Deposit Plan ensure that Llanfaethlu could identifies sufficient, deliverable and accommodate the new area primary appropriate housing land in the area and school together with additional housing the proposed change is not considered ensuring that the level of housing is required to ensure the soundness of the Mr Tom Carpenter maintained over the plan period. The site plan. 920 Map49-Llanfaethlu Object [2863] is within a sustainable location alongside the A5025, a key public transport route Recommendation which will link the village with the Amending the development boundary is planning Wylfa Newydd Nuclear Power not considered necessary to ensure the Station and also with the larger soundness of the Plan. settlements of Holyhead and Valley to the west where there are accessible links No Change to the national public transport network via the mainline railway stations. Dwr Cymru Welsh No additional growth is anticipated in Note the Support 1204 Water (Mr Dewi Map49-Llanfaethlu Support Llanfaethlu as the indicative housing Griffiths ) [2680] growth is provided for by completed Recommendation

166 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan units and the existing landbank. No Change

50) Llanfechell

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that, Comments Noted depending on the location of the The Councils will continue to engage with development, may need to be resolved to DCWW at the planning application stage. allow development to proceed. Potential Dwr Cymru Welsh developers can either wait for DCWW to Recommendation 1205 Water (Mr Dewi Map50-Llanfechell Object resolve the flooding, subject to funding No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] being approved by our regulator Ofwat, matters raised. or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of No Change the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Note the Support Llanfechell Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1206 Water (Mr Dewi Map50-Llanfechell Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area No Change

51) Llanfihangel yn Nhowyn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Dwr Cymru Welsh Llanfihangael yn Nhowyn is served by Note the Support Map 51 - Llanfihangel 1207 Water (Mr Dewi Support Holyhead Wastewater Treatment Works yn Nhowyn Griffiths ) [2680] (WwTW) which can accommodate the Recommendation

167 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

52) Llangaffo

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. this settlement would require Dwr Cymru Welsh improvements at Llangaffo Wastewater Recommendation 1208 Water (Mr Dewi Map 52 - Llangaffo Object Treatment Works (WwTW) which would No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] need to be funded through our Asset matters raised. Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

53) Llangristiolus

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Extend the development boundary to Not Accepted include the land marked in red in the It is considered that the Deposit Plan map. identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and Muriel Williams There should be a choice of housing the proposed change is not considered 921 Map 53 - Llangristiolus Object [2075] needs ion local villages which recognises required to ensure the soundness of the the housing needs of all. plan. TAI17 currently conflicts with the wider aims and objectives of PPW with respect Recommendation to housing in rural areas. Amending the development boundary is

168 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan It is difficult to reconcile the draft JLDP's not considered necessary to ensure the narrowly defined housing strategy soundness of the Plan. The policy will prove unrealistic in fulfilling its objectives and is not No Change reasonably flexible to deal with the changing circumstances which are currently faced by Anglesey as opposed to Gwynedd. Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and Building housing will provide work for the proposed change is not considered local tradesmen and trade for local required to ensure the soundness of the Mr & Mrs D.R. & merchandisers. The site had planning plan. 1007 Map 53 - Llangristiolus Object K.M. Jones [3161] permission granted for housing 29/07/1970 no A/1369a which has Recommendation lapsed. Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with DCWW at the planning application stage. No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Llangristiolus as the indicative housing 1209 Water (Mr Dewi Map 53 - Llangristiolus Support Recommendation growth is provided for by completed Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the units and the existing landbank. matters raised.

No Change

169 54) Llanrhyddlad

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Llanrhuddlad as the indicative housing 1210 Water (Mr Dewi Map 54 - Llanrhyddlad Support Recommendation growth is provided for by the existing Griffiths ) [2680] landbank. No Change

55) Pencarnisiog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan 76 Michael D Whitehead [2724] Confirm support subject to correct 632 Mr Martin Singleton interpretation- [3044] * Planning applications must conform to 636 Mr Geraint Simpson all points of TAI17. [3046] * Development is restricted to within 639 Ms Kerris Singleton outline boundaries (map 55) [3053] * Preference is given to Sustainable living 643 Myfanwy Williams Note the Support SO5 - whilst respecting the varied role [3054] and character 646 Trevor Roberts Map 55 - Pencarnisiog Support Recommendation of the centres, villages and countryside. [3042] * Preference is given to protect and 650 Tina Raistrick [3055] No Change enhance the natural and built Ms Gwion Llyn environment SO16 - Protect, 652 Williams [3056] enhance and manage the natural and Mr Dennis heritage assets of the Plan area, including 655 Whitehead [3057] its natural A.E. Stewart [3063] resources, wildlife habitats, and its 663 Dr Medwyn Williams landscape character. [3064] 666 Miss Siwan Mair

170 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Williams [3065] 668 Susan Nason [3066] 670 A.M. Nason [3067] 684 Dorothy Whitehead [3076] 710 Nerys F. Owen [3077] 715 Mr T.H. Jones [3080] 724 Mrs J Jones [3082] 725 Margaret E.P. 745 Roberts [3085] 746 Wyn Owen [3086] 747 Elen Wyn Simpson [3088] Map 55 - Pencarnisiog Support Pencaernisiog Wastewater Treatment Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1211 Water (Mr Dewi foul flows from the proposed growth Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] figures for this catchment area. No Change

56) Penysarn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Penysarn is served by Amlwch Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1212 Water (Mr Dewi Map 56 - Penysarn Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

57) Rhosybol

171 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Rhosybol is served by Amlwch Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1213 Water (Mr Dewi Map 57 - Rhosybol Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

58) Talwrn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan I would like to include my land in the identifies sufficient, deliverable and development boundary for the following appropriate housing land in the area and reasons: the proposed change is not considered - access required to ensure the soundness of the - adjacent to development boundary Mr Emlyn Williams plan. 992 Map 58 - Talwrn Object - suitability [40] - flat / dry land Recommendation - walking distance to Talwrn school Amending the development boundary is - walking distance to bus route not considered necessary to ensure the - active community with village hall soundness of the Plan. where groups are held No Change I would like to include my land in the Not Accepted development boundary for the following It is considered that the Deposit Plan reasons: identifies sufficient, deliverable and - access appropriate housing land in the area and Mr Emlyn Williams 993 Map 58 - Talwrn Object - adjacent to development boundary the proposed change is not considered [40] - suitability required to ensure the soundness of the - flat / dry land plan. - walking distance to Talwrn school - walking distance to bus route Recommendation

172 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan - active community withvillage hall Amending the development boundaryis where groups are held not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change Talwrn is served by Llangefni Wastewater Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) which can 1214 Water (Mr Dewi Map 58 - Talwrn Support accommodate the foul flows from these Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] growth figure allocated for the catchment area No Change

59) Tregele

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted Tregele is served by Cemaes Bay The Councils will continue to engage with Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). DCWW at the planning application stage. The proposed growth being promoted for Dwr Cymru Welsh this settlement may require Recommendation 1215 Water (Mr Dewi Map 59 - Tregele Object improvements to the treatment works No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through matters raised. our Asset Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer No Change contributions.

60) Abererch

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Council for the Why has a 0.9 ha area allocated for Not Accepted 717 Map 60 - Abererch Object Protection of Rural housing in the GUDP near Ty Gwyn on It is considered that the Deposit Plan

173 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Wales (Mr Noel the south side of the village been deleted identifies sufficient, deliverable and Davey) [1169] and the village boundary redrawn? appropriate housing land in the area and the proposed change is not considered required to ensure the soundness of the plan.

Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that, Comments Noted depending on the location of the The Councils will continue to engage with development, may need to be resolved to DCWW at the planning application stage. allow development to proceed. Potential Dwr Cymru Welsh developers can either wait for DCWW to Recommendation 1231 Water (Mr Dewi Map 60 - Abererch Object resolve the flooding, subject to funding No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] being approved by our regulator Ofwat, matters raised. or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of No Change the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. this settlement would require Dwr Cymru Welsh improvements at Abererch Wastewater Recommendation 1232 Water (Mr Dewi Map 60 - Abererch Object Treatment Works (WwTW) which would No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] need to be funded through our Asset matters raised. Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

174 61) Brynrefail

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan In order to provide housing choice, allow for increased flexibility and for the Not Accepted sustainability of existing services the It is considered that the Deposit Plan target housing figure for the village of identifies sufficient, deliverable and Brynrefail should be increased by a appropriate housing land in the area and further 8 units and brownfield site the proposed change is not considered identified on the attached plan should be required to ensure the soundness of the Mr Hefin Williams included within the settlement boundary. plan. 919 Map 61 - Brynrefail Object [3103] Amend table 20 to allow for 15 Recommendation residential units as the indicative growth Amending the development boundary is level of Brynrefail. not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan. Amend the settlement boundary of Brynrefail to include the proposed site No Change within the settlement. Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with DCWW at the planning application stage. Deiniolen Brynrefail Wastewater Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) can Recommendation 1233 Water (Mr Dewi Map61-Brynrefail Support accommodate the foul flows from the No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this matters raised. catchment area. No Change

62) Caeathro

175 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The Deposit Plan recognises a hierarchy of towns and villages which have a specific role and function. Within Topic Paper 5 – Developing the Settlement Strategy a methodology was developed and published to recognise these settlements on the basis of their role, function, range of facilities and services. I am aware that permission has been The spatial strategy will ensure that granted to construct 19 houses for the development is targeted to locations which field that lies across the road from Gwalia are sustainable in terms of size, role, Garage. Is this development going to character, facilities, transport links, social proceed? inclusion and environment. Therefore, Cyng/Counc Eurig there will be a sustainable pattern of 983 Map 62 - Caeathro Object If it is, I would want assurance that the Wyn [364] communities which have a viable appropriate proportion of affordable community. houses would be part of the development. I believe that in certain Distributing further growth to villages and circumstances the quota of affordable clusters beyond what has currently been housing should be increased. Hopefully recognised in Policy PS15 without robust the plan will consider this. evidence to do so would undermine the spatial strategy and the sustainability principles which the Plan is based upon.

Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change Dwr Cymru Welsh Caeathro is served by Caernarfon Comments Noted 1234 Map 62 - Caeathro Object Water (Mr Dewi Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with

176 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Griffiths ) [2680] The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. this catchment area would require improvements which would need to be Recommendation funded through our Asset Management No change is required to address the Plan or potentially earlier through matters raised. developer contributions. No Change

63) Carmel

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted Carmel is served by Llanfaglan The Councils will continue to engage with Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). DCWW at the planning application stage. The proposed growth being promoted for Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require Recommendation 1235 Water (Mr Dewi Map 63 - Carmel Object improvements which would need to be No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] funded through our Asset Management matters raised. Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

The village of Carmel is defined as a Not Accepted cluster settlement however, the Responder has mistaken Carmel, Anglesey boundary of the cluster omits parts of the for Carmel Gwynedd. village which are very much part of the Miss Nia Morris village fabric. There appears to be no It is considered that the Deposit Plan 484 Map 63 - Carmel Object [2972] logical reason for this. It is important that identifies sufficient, deliverable and the village has an opportunity to expand appropriate housing land in the area and and to regenerate and there must be the proposed change is not considered opportunities provided for that to take required to ensure the soundness of the place. There are development plan.

177 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan opportunities available including site ref SP91 on the Candidate Site register, Recommendation which is a suitable site largely surrounded Amending the development boundary is by built development. Such a site can not considered necessary to ensure the make a positive contribution to the soundness of the Plan. village. No Change

64) Cwm y Glo

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Cwm y Glo as the indicative housing 1236 Water (Mr Dewi Map 64 - Cwm y Glo Support Recommendation growth is provided for by completed Griffiths ) [2680] units and the existing landbank No Change

65) Dinas (Llanwnda)

Rep Summary of Representation/ Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 65 - Dinas Dinas as the indicative housing growth is 1237 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation (Llanwnda) provided for by completed units and the Griffiths ) [2680] existing landbank. No Change

66) Dinas Dinlle

178 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted Dinas Dinlle is served by Llanfaglan The Councils will continue to engage with Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). DCWW at the planning application stage. The proposed growth being promoted for Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1238 Water (Mr Dewi Map66-DinasDinlle Object Recommendation improvements which would need to be Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the funded through our Asset Management matters raised. Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

67) Dolydd a Maen Coch

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted Dolydd a Maen Coch is served by The Councils will continue to engage with Llanfaglan Wastewater Treatment Works DCWW at the planning application stage. (WwTW). The proposed growth being Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 67 - Dolydd & promoted for this catchment area would 1239 Water (Mr Dewi Object Recommendation Maen Coch require improvements which would need Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the to be funded through our Asset matters raised. Management Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

68) Efailnewydd

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Since the Parc yr Efail estate has been Not Accepted established, 12 houses have been built on It is considered that the Deposit Plan 961 MeganJones[3131] Map68-Efailnewydd Object the land with local families residing in identifies sufficient, deliverable and every house up to now. The fact that appropriate housing land in the area and these houses were sold so effortlessly the proposed change is not considered

179 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan together with a varying waiting list required to ensure the soundness of the proves the need for sustainable housing plan. in Efailnewydd. A local survey discovered that 12 were in Recommendation need of moving. Designation of 6 (LDP) is Amending the development boundary is low compared to the need that was not considered necessary to ensure the found in the survey. soundness of the Plan. Ideal site to build houses with services nearby. No Change Since the Parc yr Efail estate has been established, 12 houses have been built on the land with local families residing in every house up to now. The fact that these houses were sold so effortlessly together with a varying waiting list Not Accepted proves the need for sustainable housing It is considered that the Deposit Plan in Efailnewydd. identifies sufficient, deliverable and A local survey discovered that 12 were in appropriate housing land in the area and need of moving. Designation of 6 (LDP) is the proposed change is not considered low compared to the need that was required to ensure the soundness of the found in the survey. plan. 963 MeganJones[3131] Map68-Efailnewydd Object Ideal site to build houses with services nearby. Recommendation 10 of the 12 are Welsh speakers who Amending the development boundary is cannot afford housing on the open not considered necessary to ensure the market and not enough available houses soundness of the Plan. to let or buy locally. Result - move to an unfamiliar area away from their family No Change and friends Enquiries by local Welsh speakers looking for open market plots. Extend the current boundary to include part of land near Parc yr Efail. 966 Dr B Hughes-Parry Map 68 - Efailnewydd Object Alteration of the proposed development Not Accepted

180 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan [3132] boundary for Efailnewydd (Map Inset 68) It is considered that theDeposit Plan to include Land at Penllwyn to provide for identifies sufficient, deliverable and a deliverable site on the edge of the appropriate housing land in the area and settlement boundary suitable for the proposed change is not considered residential development of circa 6 required to ensure the soundness of the dwellings. plan. Objection to the restriction of growth in Efailnewydd to 8 windfall dwellings over Recommendation the plan period and the drawing of the Amending the development boundary is development boundary. Objection to the not considered necessary to ensure the sustainability assessment for Efailnewydd soundness of the Plan. (settlement score). The current approach actually puts at risk the viability of local No Change services. Note the Support Efailnewydd Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1240 Water (Mr Dewi Map68-Efailnewydd Support Recommendation foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

69) Garndolbenmaen

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan The proposed growth being promoted for this settlement would require Note the Support improvements at Garndolbenmaen Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 69 - Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1241 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Garndolbenmaen which would need to be funded through Griffiths ) [2680] our Asset Management Plan or No Change potentially earlier through developer contributions.

181 70) Garreg-Llanfrothen

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Llanfrothen Garreg Wastewater Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) can Map 70 - Garreg- 1242 Water (Mr Dewi Support accommodate the foul flows from the Recommendation Llanfrothen Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

71) Groeslon

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan My request is that the village boundary be extended to include the field as indicated on the enclosed map. Not Accepted On checking the plan of the village It is considered that the Deposit Plan boundary there does not appear to be identifies sufficient, deliverable and any other suitable sites for building. My appropriate housing land in the area and field is landlocked and is only occasionally the proposed change is not considered by horses to keep the grass down. required to ensure the soundness of the Mr Kenneth Pitts plan. 922 Map 71 - Groeslon Object my proposal is to be able to build a [3104] bungalow alongside the existing house Recommendation (for our own private use). Access could be Amending the development boundary is gained via the gate leading to the field. not considered necessary to ensure the The remaining parcel of land could be soundness of the Plan. used as further development and access could be gained along the existing No Change driveway to the main house. According to the indicative plan 11 houses are required in the village, a percentage of your quota might be achieved by

182 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan developing this land.

This site is particularly suitable for development due to easy access to all services. Please include SP71 in the Development Plan.

- The site was one of the four sites proposed for the new Primary School. Not Accepted - It has good access to the highway. It is considered that the Deposit Plan - Has the potential of creating more local identifies sufficient, deliverable and housing in the village of Groeslon. appropriate housing land in the area and - Attracting more people of working age the proposed change is not considered and their children into the community to required to ensure the soundness of the Mr Eurwyn Jones support school. plan. 1228 Map 71 - Groeslon Object [2884] - Reduce outmigration of working age people and families enabling young Recommendation people to remain in village via affordable Amending the development boundary is housing. not considered necessary to ensure the - Safeguard the Welsh language. soundness of the Plan. - Promote community interaction and social inclusion. No Change - Opposite Lôn Arfon providing opportunity for healthier lifestyles.

- Groeslon is served by Llanfaglan Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with Dwr Cymru Welsh The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. 1243 Water (Mr Dewi Map 71 - Groeslon Object this catchment area would require Griffiths ) [2680] improvements which would need to be Recommendation funded through our Asset Management No change is required to address the Plan or potentially earlier through matters raised.

183 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan developer contributions. No Change

72) Llandwrog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted Llandwrog is served by Llanfaglan The Councils will continue to engage with Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). DCWW at the planning application stage. The proposed growth being promoted for Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1244 Water (Mr Dewi Map72-Llandwrog Object Recommendation improvements which would need to be Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the funded through our Asset Management matters raised. Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

73) Llandygai

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan We wish to object to the exclusion of Not Accepted land at Hewden's Plant Hire and the It is considered that the Deposit Plan adjacent warehouse from the identifies sufficient, deliverable and development boundary of Llandygai as it appropriate housing land in the area and is considered that the exclusion of this the proposed change is not considered 923 MrBCarter[3105] Map73-Llandygai Object substantial previously developed land is required to ensure the soundness of the contrary the advice contained within plan. Planning Policy Wales. Recommendation We wish for the sites to be included Amending the development boundary is within the development boundary of not considered necessary to ensure the

184 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Llandygai. soundness of the Plan.

No Change Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Llandygai as the indicative housing 1245 Water (Mr Dewi Map73-Llandygai Support Recommendation growth is provided for by completed Griffiths ) [2680] units and the existing landbank. No Change

74) Llangybi

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Llangybi Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1246 Water (Mr Dewi Map 74 - Llangybi Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

75) Llanllyfni

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Llanllyfni Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1247 Water (Mr Dewi Map 75 - Llanllyfni Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

76) Llanystumdwy

185 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Llanystumdwy Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 76 - Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1248 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Llanystumdwy foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

77) Nantlle

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan A stream springs from the Pen yr Orsedd quarry and then under the land at Tŷ Mawr and Sycharth. Comes out as a stream on land in the south and into the 'mud'. Risk of pollution and an impact on Not Accepted the balance of the area's wildlife. Risk of It is considered that the Deposit Plan flooding to developments given the local identifies sufficient, deliverable and history of floods in the Barics. appropriate housing land in the area and the proposed change is not considered Move the boundary closer to the houses required to ensure the soundness of the (perhaps to where it was originally) to Mrs Vera Jones plan. 928 Map 77 - Nantlle Object ensure that there will be no building on [3113] the land. To ensure that there will be Recommendation enough suitable land to permit housing Amending the development boundary is developments in Nantlle, the proposed not considered necessary to ensure the development boundary to the south of soundness of the Plan. Swn y Nant should be expanded to be a 60m boundary which abuts Sycharth. No Change Here, there would be no risk of an impact on nature and wildlife or the possibility of creating unnecessary pollution. By giving more room here it is believed that there would also be less traffic encroaching on

186 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the centre of Nantlle village. Nantlle is served by Llanllyfni Wastewater Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) which can 1249 Water (Mr Dewi Map 77 - Nantlle Support accommodate the foul flows from the Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change Proposal moves the village's boundary to the west in order to provide land for 6 new houses that are part of the LDP. Not Accepted I foresee several problems with this: It is considered that the Deposit Plan - A public footpath runs through the identifies sufficient, deliverable and middle of the site appropriate housing land in the area and - A stream runs through the middle of the the proposed change is not considered site which comes off the quarry and has required to ensure the soundness of the Cyng/Counc Craig ab created a long list of problems for the plan. 1290 Map 77 - Nantlle Object Iago [347] barracks - The site has no obvious entrance Recommendation Amending the development boundary is The best option is to extend the not considered necessary to ensure the boundary down the main road to the soundness of the Plan. right (SP430). The land is dryer, has access from the main road and there is No Change no public footpath. More importantly, local people with children wish to build houses on it.

78) Penisarwaun

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Dwr Cymru Welsh Pensairwaun Wastewater Treatment Note the Support 1250 Map 78 -Penisarwaun Support Water (Mr Dewi Works (WwTW) can accommodate the

187 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Griffiths ) [2680] foul flows from the proposed growth Recommendation figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change As land to build housesupon is scarce in the Penisarwaun area, we would like to make an application to slightly extend the Not Accepted development boundary, permitting the It is considered that the Deposit Plan construction of one or two houses in identifies sufficient, deliverable and some areas that abut the current appropriate housing land in the area and development boundary - See numbers 1, the proposed change is not considered 2, 3 and 4 in the included map. There are required to ensure the soundness of the Cyngor Cymuned several young people who live in the area plan. 1386 Llanddeiniolen (Ms Map78-Penisarwaun Object at present with their parents, or who Eleri Bean) [1531] have had to leave to have a house to live Recommendation in, who are very eager to settle down in Amending the development boundary is Penisarwaun. not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan. The deposit plan as it currently stands does not permit the construction of No Change enough housing to meet the demand in Penisarwaun.

79) Pentref Uchaf

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Pentre Uchaf Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 79 - Pentref Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1251 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Uchaf foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

188 80) Rhiwlas

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan The land is located immediately adjacent to the settlement boundary and has an existing access road. There are no international, national or local biodiversity designations or designated heritage assets within or adjacent to the site. Approximately half of the proposed Not Accepted site is adjacent to the existing village It is considered that the Deposit Plan boundary and therefore would not be identifies sufficient, deliverable and viewed as encroachment into open appropriate housing land in the area and countryside and would integrate with the the proposed change is not considered built form of a settlement. The site is not required to ensure the soundness of the Robert Harrison within a flood risk area. plan. 998 Map 80 - Rhiwlas Object [3158] Hoped that housing on the site will have positive effects to promote social Recommendation inclusion and community cohesion. Lack Amending the development boundary is of potential new building land within the not considered necessary to ensure the existing village boundary, and site could soundness of the Plan. provide low cost affordable local needs housing which in turn could benefit the No Change local school.

I wish to submit a proposal for a new site to be added that lies outside the existing village boundary of Rhiwlas, Gwynedd, North Wales. Note the Support Rhiwlas Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1252 Water (Mr Dewi Map 80 - Rhiwlas Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area No Change

189 81) Rhosgadfan

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that, Comments Noted depending on the location of the The Councils will continue to engage with development, may need to be resolved to DCWW at the planning application stage. allow development to proceed. Potential Dwr Cymru Welsh developers can either wait for DCWW to Recommendation 1306 Water (Mr Dewi Map81-Rhosgadfan Object resolve the flooding, subject to funding No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] being approved by our regulator Ofwat, matters raised. or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of No Change the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Comments Noted Rhosgadfan is served by Llanfaglan The Councils will continue to engage with Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). DCWW at the planning application stage. The proposed growth being promoted for Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1307 Water (Mr Dewi Map81-Rhosgadfan Object Recommendation improvements which would need to be Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the funded through our Asset Management matters raised. Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions No Change

82) Rhostryfan

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan I would like to request a change to the Not Accepted deposit plan (82 Rhostryfan). To include It is considered that the Deposit Plan 946 DelythOwen[3122] Map82-Rhostryfan Object the land outlined in red in the enclosed identifies sufficient, deliverable and copy of the deposit plan. appropriate housing land in the area and I believe that before the plan was the proposed change is not considered

190 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan changed that this piece of land was required to ensure the soundness of the within the village boundary, as I was told plan. previously by a representative of the planning office in Caernarfon to go in for Recommendation full planning as outlined planning wasn't Amending the development boundary is needed. not considered necessary to ensure the The land in question is surrounded by soundness of the Plan. houses on all sides, with no access problems. No Change To add the land marked red to be included in the village boundary. Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Rhostryfan as the indicative housing 1308 Water (Mr Dewi Map82-Rhostryfan Support Recommendation growth is provided for by completed Griffiths ) [2680] units and the existing landbank No Change

83) Sarn Mellteyrn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Sarn Mellteyrn Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 83 - Sarn Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1309 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Mellteyrn foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

84) Talysarn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan 553 Cyngor Cymuned Map 84 - Talysarn Object Object to the size of the land (SP860) in Not Accepted

191 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Llanllyfni (Mrs Alwen question for the use ofa small village It is considered that theDeposit Plan Johnson) [2835] such as Talysarn. identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and Of course building land is needed in the the proposed change is not considered Village, but if the plan is adopted in its required to ensure the soundness of the current form, it will change the character plan. of the village and will adversely affect the language, noise level and will also add to Recommendation traffic on the streets which are already Amending the development boundary is too narrow and dangerous for existing not considered necessary to ensure the traffic. soundness of the Plan.

No Change I wish for the land identified as SP860 to be taken out of the development plan.

1. The fact that there is a covenant Not Accepted preventing the change of use of a section It is considered that the Deposit Plan of the land. identifies sufficient, deliverable and 2. Any development on this land will have appropriate housing land in the area and a detrimental effect on the privacy and the proposed change is not considered amenities of the properties surrounding required to ensure the soundness of the it. Gareth Lloyd Jones plan. 1261 Map 84 - Talysarn Object 3. Any subsequent proposals for [3171] developing the land, if included within Recommendation the new LDP would be in contradiction to Amending the development boundary is a number of the Council's own planning not considered necessary to ensure the policies. soundness of the Plan. 4. A brownfield site, already located within the current UDP area has been No Change refused planning permission for its clearance for development twice since 2007. This being in contradiction of Council planning policy C3.

192 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Talysarn is served by Llanllyfni Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1310 Water (Mr Dewi Map 84 - Talysarn Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

85) Trefor

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Trefor Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1313 Water (Mr Dewi Map 85 - Trefor Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

86) Tregarth

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Would be grateful if you would consider Not Accepted the land edged red on the plan attached It is considered that the Deposit Plan as a housing designation within the identifies sufficient, deliverable and proposed Gwynedd and Mon Local Plan, appropriate housing land in the area and for the following reason: the proposed change is not considered MWJ Properties Ltd required to ensure the soundness of the 1010 Map 86 - Tregarth Object (Mark Jones) [3165] * Closely follows the development plan. boundary for Tregarth; * Used to alleviate the housing pressure Recommendation within larger towns of Bethesda and Amending the development boundary is Bangor; not considered necessary to ensure the * Junction onto B4409 has sufficient soundness of the Plan.

193 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan capacity for sustainable housing development No Change * In a position to provide planning, highway and amenity gains. A large % of the community at Craig y Pandy and Waen y Pandy Tregarth wish to object to the inclusion of land that Not Accepted covers our two streets. It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and We feel it would make our area less safe appropriate housing land in the area and for residents, an increase in traffic, the the proposed change is not considered infrastructure in not suitable, effects on required to ensure the soundness of the biodiversity and affect the living Mr mark richards plan. 1270 Map 86 - Tregarth Object conditions of adjacent occupiers. [2907] Recommendation There are no village services and a Amending the development boundary is diminishing public transport service. not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan. In previous consultations the council was of the opinion that "the land at Craig y No Change Pandy and Waun y Pandy is unsuitable to be included within the development boundary and/or allocated for housing". There are isolated incidents of flooding in Comments Noted the public sewerage system that, The Councils will continue to engage with depending on the location of the DCWW at the planning application stage. development, may need to be resolved to Dwr Cymru Welsh allow development to proceed. Potential Recommendation 1311 Water (Mr Dewi Map 86 - Tregarth Object developers can either wait for DCWW to No change is required to address the Griffiths ) [2680] resolve the flooding, subject to funding matters raised. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through No Change the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of

194 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Note the Support Tregarth Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1312 Water (Mr Dewi Map 86 - Tregarth Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

87) Tudweiliog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Tudweiliog Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1314 Water (Mr Dewi Map87-Tudweiliog Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area No Change

88) Waunfawr

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan I wish to make a representation to Not Accepted include the site 'Cae Top Frondeg' for It is considered that the Deposit Plan inclusion for the development of housing identifies sufficient, deliverable and within the Anglesey and Gwynedd appropriate housing land in the area and Deposit Joint Local Development Plan the proposed change is not considered Jason Anderson 949 Map88-Waunfawr Object 2011-2026. I feel that the current required to ensure the soundness of the [3123] proposed development boundary around plan. this site does not take into account the natural and historical boundary of the Recommendation village and also the fact that this site is Amending the development boundary is situated between 3 residential properties not considered necessary to ensure the

195 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan and the road making it suitable for soundness of the Plan. inclusion within the boundary as windfill/infill site. The site is not green No Change belt, has never been agricultural use, also there has also been development of an area only 25 metres away also outside the boundary into hard standing car park for Antur Waunfawr, this shows that there is scope for development. I request that this site is included within the boundary as windfall/infill site. The field opposite Snowdonia Fire has Not Accepted not been included within the It is considered that the Deposit Plan development boundary even though identifies sufficient, deliverable and there are plans to developed a surgery appropriate housing land in the area and and football field on the site. the proposed change is not considered required to ensure the soundness of the I would like to see the field included Cyng/Counc Eurig plan. 1298 Map88-Waunfawr Object within the village's development Wyn [364] boundary. There is an agreement Recommendation between the Betsi Cadwaladr Health Amending the development boundary is Board and the village surgery that this is not considered necessary to ensure the the location for the new village surgery. soundness of the Plan. There is also an informal agreement that a football field will be located to the rear No Change of the new surgery. Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Waunfawr as the indicative housing 1315 Water (Mr Dewi Map88-Waunfawr Support Recommendation growth is provided for by completed Griffiths ) [2680] units and the existing landbank No Change

196 89) Y Fron

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Y Fron is served by Llanllyfni Wastewater Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) which can 1316 Water (Mr Dewi Map89 -YFron Support accommodate the foul flows from the Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

COASTAL / RURAL VILLAGES

90) Aberffraw

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Aberffraw Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1216 Water (Mr Dewi Map90-Aberffraw Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

91) Carreglefn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Carreglefn does not have public sewerage Comments Noted facilities therefore the provisions of The Councils will continue to engage with Dwr Cymru Welsh Circular 10/99 'Planning Requirement in DCWW at the planning application stage. 1217 Water (Mr Dewi Map91-Carreglefn Object respect of the Use of Non-Mains Griffiths ) [2680] Sewerage incorporating Septic Tanks in Recommendation New Development' apply and No change is required to address the consultation with Natural Resources matters raised.

197 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Wales will be required. No Change

92) Llanbedrgoch

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted It is considered that the Deposit Plan identifies sufficient, deliverable and appropriate housing land in the area and The land hatched in red on the attached the proposed change is not considered plan we feel should be considered for required to ensure the soundness of the Mr Greg Donald Map 92 - development in the future as plan. 1108 Object [3230] Llanbedrgoch Llanbedrgoch is an established village and needs to grow in order to sustain the Recommendation village community. Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change Comments Noted Llanbedrgoch does not have public The Councils will continue to engage with sewerage facilities therefore the DCWW at the planning application stage. provisions of Circular 10/99 'Planning Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 92 - Requirement in respect of the Use of 1219 Water (Mr Dewi Object Recommendation Llanbedrgoch Non-Mains Sewerage incorporating Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the Septic Tanks in New Development' apply matters raised. and consultation with Natural Resources Wales will be required No Change

198 93) Llanbedrgoch

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Llanddona is served by Llangoed Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1220 Water (Mr Dewi Map93-Llanddona Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

94) Llanfaelog

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Comments Noted Llanfaelog is served by Rhosneigr The Councils will continue to engage with Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). DCWW at the planning application stage. The proposed growth being promoted for Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1221 Water (Mr Dewi Map94-Llanfaelog Object Recommendation improvements which would need to be Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the funded through our Asset Management matters raised. Plan or potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

95) Llangoed

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan There are isolated incidents of flooding in Comments Noted the public sewerage system that, The Councils will continue to engage with Dwr Cymru Welsh depending on the location of the DCWW at the planning application stage. 1222 Water (Mr Dewi Map 95 - Llangoed Object development, may need to be resolved to Griffiths ) [2680] allow development to proceed. Potential Recommendation developers can either wait for DCWW to No change is required to address the

199 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan resolve the flooding, subject to funding matters raised. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through No Change the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Note the Support Llangoed Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1223 Water (Mr Dewi Map 95 - Llangoed Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

96) Malltraeth

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Malltraeth Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1224 Water (Mr Dewi Map96-Malltraeth Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

97) Moelfre

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan The development boundary around the Not Accepted village of Moelfre has been drawn very It is considered that the Deposit Plan Mr B Pritchard tightly and in a manner that will limit the identifies sufficient, deliverable and 480 Map 97 - Moelfre Object [2951] prospect of any new housing appropriate housing land in the area and development in an overly restrictive way. the proposed change is not considered There are opportunities to develop small required to ensure the soundness of the

200 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan infill sites within the existing builtform of plan. the village but outside the defined boundary. Land to the west of the village, Recommendation specifically part of the site referred to as Amending the development boundary is SP164 on the Candidate Site register can not considered necessary to ensure the offer such a solution. The Plan identifies soundness of the Plan. limited housing growth for Moelfre but is not clear as to where such sites will be No Change found. Land adj Ystant Nant Bychan, Moelfre. Moelfre should be included as a Local Not Accepted Service Centre under Policy TAI15. It is It is considered that the Deposit Plan considered that there is an over-reliance identifies sufficient, deliverable and on windfall sites within the Local appropriate housing land in the area and Development Plan. Land should be the proposed change is not considered allocated for housing to accommodate required to ensure the soundness of the Cadnant Planning the identified housing need. It is plan. 1158 (Mr Rhys Davies) Map 97 - Moelfre Object considered that only allowing local [1366] market housing and affordable housing Recommendation within Moelfre will weaken the Amending the development boundary is community, resulting in an increase in not considered necessary to ensure the deprivation and will threaten the soundness of the Plan. sustainability of the settlement. We propose a site adjacent to Ystad Nant No Change Bychan to be included within the development boundary for housing. Moelfre is served by Benllech Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1225 Water (Mr Dewi Map 97 - Moelfre Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change The proposal map for Moelfre shows the Not Accepted Mr Neil Fairburn 1259 Map 97 - Moelfre Object garden curtilage of my property as having It is considered that the Deposit Plan [3290] fields. These green areas are my garden, identifies sufficient, deliverable and

201 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan not fields and need to be amended. appropriate housing land in the area and the proposed change is not considered The garden curtilage of Cocyn Uchaf required to ensure the soundness of the should be included in the LDP for Moelfre plan. as house is part of the village. I am looking to apply for planning permission Recommendation to build a property within the curtilage Amending the development boundary is for my son and elderly mother (see figure not considered necessary to ensure the 2 &3). soundness of the Plan.

No Change

98) Four Mile Bridge

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Pont Rhyd y Bont is served by Holyhead Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 98 - Four Mile 1218 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Bridge Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

99) Trearddur

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Old Cricket Ground, Trearddur. This site Not Accepted has a fairly recently approved, and now Topic Paper 5 ‘Developing the Settlement Planning Consultant extant planning consent, for the erection Strategy’ outlines the methodology used to 1042 Map99-Trearddur Object (Ms Jan Tyrer) [1515] of 17 dwellings as a result of the not identify the role of different centres within insubstantial works already undertaken the Plan area. on site. The site contributes to the

202 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan current 5 year housing land supply and as In light of this work Trearddur was a committed site for a housing identified as a Coastal Village under policy development it should be included in the TAI 17 in the Deposit Plan with an development boundary for Trearddur Bay anticipated growth level of 32 units for the as has happened in other LDPs. plan period.

Land at the Old Cricket ground has had the benefit of planning permission for a number of years but has not been developed to date.

The site falls within a C?? flood risk zone. In light of this…..

In fact Table 3 in Appendix 5 of the Deposit Plan identifies a number of units from the land bank which are unlikely to be completed and part of the 100 units for Trearddur is the Old Cricket ground site.

Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change Land adj Timant, Trearddur. It is Not Accepted considered that Trearddur has been The Deposit Plan recognises a hierarchy of categorised incorrectly and should be towns and villages which have a specific Cadnant Planning included as a Service Village under Policy role and function. Within Topic Paper 5 – 1161 (Mr Rhys Davies) Map99-Trearddur Object TAI16. It is considered that there is an Developing the Settlement Strategy a [1366] over-reliance on windfall sites within the methodology was developed and published LDP. Land should be allocated for to recognise these settlements on the basis housing to accommodate the identified of their role, function, range of facilities

203 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan housing need. It is considered that only and services. allowing local market housing and affordable housing within Trearddur will The spatial strategy will ensure that weaken the community both socially and development is targeted to locations which economically resulting in an increase in are sustainable in terms of size, role, deprivation. We wish to propose a site at character, facilities, transport links, social Lôn St Ffraid to be included in the inclusion and environment. Therefore, development boundary and allocated for there will be a sustainable pattern of housing. communities which have a viable community.

Distributing further growth to villages and clusters beyond what has currently been recognised in Policy PS15 without robust evidence to do so would undermine the spatial strategy and the sustainability principles which the Plan is based upon.

Recommendation Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change There are isolated incidents of flooding in Comments Noted the public sewerage system that, The Councils will continue to engage with depending on the location of the DCWW at the planning application stage. development, may need to be resolved to Dwr Cymru Welsh allow development to proceed. Potential 1226 Water (Mr Dewi Map99-Trearddur Object Recommendation developers can either wait for DCWW to Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the resolve the flooding, subject to funding matters raised. being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through No Change the sewerage requisition provisions of

204 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Trearddur is served by Holyhead Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1227 Water (Mr Dewi Map99-Trearddur Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

100) Aberdaron

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Aberdaron Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1317 Water (Mr Dewi Map100-Aberdaron Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

101) Borth y Gest

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan I feel that the 20 acres of land i own Not Accepted should be included in the boundaries of It is considered that the Deposit Plan what is deemed to be land that can be identifies sufficient, deliverable and part of this policy i.e. Affordable Housing, appropriate housing land in the area and Mr Alun Evans Map 101 - Borth y the land can be used to build one or two the proposed change is not considered 1174 Object [2854] Gest houses, the remainder of the land has required to ensure the soundness of the much many wildlife benefits and can plan. accordingly be developed into a nature reserve or maintained to preserve the Recommendation environment. The land in question is as Amending the development boundary is

205 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan follows SH5637 and SH5638 Borth y Gest, not considered necessary to ensure the Porthmadog. soundness of the Plan.

No Change Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with Borth y Gest is served by Porthmadog DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 101 - Borth y 1318 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Gest Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure No change is required to address the allocated for this catchment area matters raised.

No Change Children must have the right to play outside, and most houses in Borth-y-Gest don't have gardens, so this provision must be retained. The playing field is also safe: no danger from cars or from dogs running wild. There has been an increase Comment Noted in the number of children and families, Borth y Gest’s playground and surrounding and the park enables families to meet park has identified as a protected open Mr Dafydd Hughes Map 101 – Borthy and play safely. Losing the park would space. 1012 Object [3162] Gest remove the heart from such a small village where resources such as those Recommendation that currently exist enable families to bring up their children in a safe No change environment. Such a development would place a huge pressure on the village's services, bearing in mind that there is no suitable sewerage system in place or suitable access to the site.

206 102) Clynnog Fawr

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan As a Coastal/Rural Village, Clynnog is Not Accepted assigned an indicative housing provision It is considered that the Deposit Plan of 10 units, all to come from windfall identifies sufficient, deliverable and sites. As there are no allocated housing appropriate housing land in the area and sites, we are puzzled why an extension to the proposed change is not considered the village boundary is shown on the map Council for the required to ensure the soundness of the in north east of the village. It would be Protection of Rural Map 102 - Clynnog plan. 712 Object preferable to developing land (SP673) in Wales (Mr Noel Fawr the south west. We understand that part Davey) [1169] Recommendation of the latter area is subject to a covenant Amending the development boundary is restricting development and we would not considered necessary to ensure the oppose housing here, particularly in the soundness of the Plan. southern part of the site, on grounds of adverse visual impact on the church and No Change graveyard. As a Coastal/Rural Village, Clynnog is Not Accepted assigned an indicative housing provision It is considered that the Deposit Plan of 10 units, all to come from windfall identifies sufficient, deliverable and sites. As there are no allocated housing appropriate housing land in the area and sites, we are puzzled why an extension to the proposed change is not considered the village boundary is shown on the map Council for the required to ensure the soundness of the in north east of the village. It would be Protection of Rural Map 102 - Clynnog plan. 714 Object preferable to developing land (SP673) in Wales (Mr Noel Fawr the south west. We understand that part Davey) [1169] Recommendation of the latter area is subject to a covenant Amending the development boundary is restricting development and we would not considered necessary to ensure the oppose housing here, particularly in the soundness of the Plan. southern part of the site, on grounds of adverse visual impact on the church and No Change graveyard. Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 102 - Clynnog Clynnog Fawr is served by Pontllyfni Note the Support 1319 Support Water (Mr Dewi Fawr Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW)

207 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Griffiths ) [2680] which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

103) Corris

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support Lower Corris Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1320 Water (Mr Dewi Map 103 - Corris Support Recommendation foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

104) Edern

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Edern is served by Morfa Nefyn Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1321 Water (Mr Dewi Map 104 - Edern Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

105) Fairbourne

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Dwr Cymru Welsh No additional growth is anticipated in Note the Support 1322 Water (Mr Dewi Map105-Fairbourne Support Fairbourne as the indicative housing Griffiths ) [2680] growth is provided for by completed Recommendation

208 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan units and the existing landbank. No Change

106) Llanaelheaern

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan A strip to the east of the main road in the Not Accepted south of the village is proposed to be It is considered that the Deposit Plan included within the JDLP village identifies sufficient, deliverable and development boundary, although there is appropriate housing land in the area and no allocated housing site or proposal on the proposed change is not considered Council for the the candidate site register. Why has this required to ensure the soundness of the Protection of Rural Map 106 - change from the GUDP boundary been plan. 716 Object Wales (Mr Noel Llanealhaearn made? This may be an appropriate area Davey) [1169] for infill development given an existing Recommendation group of buildings to the south and line Amending the development boundary is of housing on the opposite side of the not considered necessary to ensure the road. However, ribbon development soundness of the Plan. along the main road is a growing source of traffic hazard in this village. No Change Comments Noted The proposed growth being promoted for The Councils will continue to engage with this settlement would require DCWW at the planning application stage. improvements at Llanaelhaearn Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 106 - Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1323 Water (Mr Dewi Object Recommendation Llanealhaearn which would need to be funded through Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change

107) Llanbedrog

209 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan The site that was included in the Candidate Site Register under site reference number SP422 during the consultation period should be included in the final Plan. The site is 0.17ha in size Not Accepted and is located in a brownfield site in the It is considered that the Deposit Plan centre of the village. The development identifies sufficient, deliverable and boundary of Llanbedrog lies directly east, appropriate housing land in the area and south and west of the site with only the the proposed change is not considered North site of the village not included required to ensure the soundness of the within the Boundary. John Brinley Jones plan. 1025 Map107-Llanbedrog Object This site was included within the Draft [2087] UDP of Gwynedd in 2004. I only need a Recommendation single dwelling as a home on the site. Amending the development boundary is not considered necessary to ensure the To Include Candidate Site SP422 within soundness of the Plan. the development boundary of Llanbedrog, within inset Map 107 No Change Llanbedrog of the Deposit Plan. The site is a brownfield site and is located at the centre of this coastal village. The site was included in the last UDP Deposit Plan back in 2004. Why has the development boundary for Not Accepted Llanbedrog been extended to include a It is considered that the Deposit Plan piece of land on Lon Pwllheli as a red area identifies sufficient, deliverable and in the map as an appendix, whilst the appropriate housing land in the area and Cyngor Cymuned land known as SP422 rear of Capel Seion the proposed change is not considered 1297 Llanbedrog (Mr John Map107-Llanbedrog Object which is coloured blue in the appendix required to ensure the soundness of the Harris) [1547] has not been included. plan. Both sites have had planning permission as a parking area etc recently but why Recommendation haven't both sites been included? Amending the development boundary is Certainly there isn't a consistent not considered necessary to ensure the

210 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan approach to extending the boundary soundness of the Plan. where planning permission recently. No Change Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Llanbedrog as the indicative housing 1325 Water (Mr Dewi Map 107- Llanbedrog Support Recommendation growth is provided for by completed Griffiths ) [2680] units and the existing landbank. No Change Include SP422 within the development Not Accepted boundary of Llanbedrog. The site is It is considered that the Deposit Plan 0.17ha in size and is located in a identifies sufficient, deliverable and brownfield site in the centre of the appropriate housing land in the area and village. The development boundary of the proposed change is not considered Llanbedrog lies directly east, south and required to ensure the soundness of the west of the site with only the north site John Brinley Jones plan. 1384 Map107-Llanbedrog Object of the village not included within the [2087] Boundary. Recommendation Amending the development boundary is The site was included within the draft not considered necessary to ensure the UDP of Gwynedd in 2004. soundness of the Plan. I only need a single dwelling as a home No Change on the site. Accepted SP715 should be indluded adn identified Established playground in the centreof in the plan as a play area only not settlement development land. Cyngor Cymuned 1294 Llanbedrog (Mr John Map107-Llanbedrog Object Recommendation The land is Llanbedrog's Playing Field and Harris) [1547] Identify as Protected Open Space on Inset is owned by Llanbedrog Community Map. Council. The Council wishes to safeguard this playing field. Focussed Change NF130 Cyngor Cymuned SP714 should be included and identified Not Accepted 1294 Map107-Llanbedrog Object Llanbedrog (Mr John in the plan as a play area only. According No formal play equipment on site. Land

211 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Harris) [1547] to the permission granted for Ty'n Pwll has protection via planning condition. Estate 26 May 1376, application number 2/18/3/D - the following condition Recommendation applies: No Change "Amenity space between plots 7&8 shall be maintained as an open space to the satisfaction of the local planning authority."

Please see as an attachement a letter fated Feb 2000 from Gruffydd Wyn Morris - Gynedd's Planning Manager that states this fact.

108) Llangian

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Llangian is served by Abersoch Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1324 Water (Mr Dewi Map108-Llangian Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change

109) Llithfaen

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Dwr Cymru Welsh Llithfaen Wastewater Treatment Works Note the Support 1326 Water (Mr Dewi Map109-Llithfaen Support (WwTW) can accommodate the foul Griffiths ) [2680] flows from the proposed growth figure Recommendation

212 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan allocated for this catchment area No Change

110) Morfa Bychan Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 110 - Morfa Morfa Bychan as the indicative housing 1327 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Bychan growth is provided for by completed Griffiths ) [2680] units and the existing landbank. No Change

111) Morfa Nefyn

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan 1. Community need housing isnot Not Accepted defined. Plan should be clarified to It is considered that the Deposit Plan confirm the status of community need identifies sufficient, deliverable and housing as open market housing (and not appropriate housing land in the area and otherwise restricted). the proposed change is not considered required to ensure the soundness of the Map 111 - Morfa 2.Additional open market housing sites plan. 465 Tai Twnti Cyf [2868] Object Nefyn would not harm the plan strategy nor the welsh language. Recommendation Amending the development boundary is 3. Additional land could be allocated for not considered necessary to ensure the housing or the development soundness of the Plan. boundary extended to accommodate development. Two sites are suggested. No Change 1328 Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 111 - Morfa Support No additional growth is anticipated in Note the Support

213 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Water (Mr Dewi Nefyn Morfa Nefyn as the indicative housing Griffiths ) [2680] growth is provided for by completed Recommendation units and the existing landbank No Change

112) Mynytho

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan There are isolated incidents of flooding in the public sewerage system that, Comments Noted depending on the location of the The Councils will continue to engage with development, may need to be resolved to DCWW at the planning application stage. allow development to proceed. Potential Dwr Cymru Welsh developers can either wait for DCWW to 1329 Water (Mr Dewi Map112-Mynytho Object Recommendation resolve the flooding, subject to funding Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the being approved by our regulator Ofwat, matters raised. or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of No Change the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. Note the Support Mynytho Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1330 Water (Mr Dewi Map112-Mynytho Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area No Change

113) Rhoshirwaun

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan 1258 Mr William Rickards Map 113 - Object It is my belief that the alternative site Not Accepted

214 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan [3289] Rhoshirwaun mentioned and outlined in the attached It is considered that theDeposit Plan plan is eligible to be included in the identifies sufficient, deliverable and deposit plan. My reasons for believing appropriate housing land in the area and are so: the proposed change is not considered - The site lies between existing dwellings required to ensure the soundness of the and the construction of a single dwelling plan. would not be harmful to the natural beauty of the area. Recommendation - The site has existing services as there Amending the development boundary is has been a static caravan on the north not considered necessary to ensure the side of the site for as long as anyone can soundness of the Plan. remember. If a dwelling was built it would replace the caravan. No Change - The site has adequate access to the highway ie good visibility splay etc - The site is close to Ysgol Llidiardau. Comments Noted Rhoshirwaen does not have public The Councils will continue to engage with sewerage facilities therefore the DCWW at the planning application stage. provisions of Circular 10/99 'Planning Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 113 - Requirement in respect of the Use of 1331 Water (Mr Dewi Object Recommendation Rhoshirwaun Non-Mains Sewerage incorporating Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the Septic Tanks in New Development' apply matters raised. and consultation with Natural Resources Wales will be required. No Change

114) Sarn Bach

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Dwr Cymru Welsh Sarn Bach is served by Abersoch Note the Support 1332 Water (Mr Dewi Map114-SarnBach Support Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Griffiths ) [2680] which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation

215 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

115) Y Felinheli

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted The Site adjacent to Y Wern Tan y Maes, It is considered that the Deposit Plan Felinheli forms part of the current UDP, identifies sufficient, deliverable and this is owned by Mr Lewis who has appropriate housing land in the area and instructed us to proceed with the the proposed change is not considered development in partnership with CCG required to ensure the soundness of the who own a plot of land adjacent. CCG are Mr Geraint Lewis plan. 296 Map115-YFelinheli Object proposing a development of 6 affordable [2877] houses and our client is proposing 8 Recommendation affordable and 8 open market housing. Amending the development boundary is Our main objection is that this plot of not considered necessary to ensure the land has been omitted from the JLDP for soundness of the Plan. no apparent reason, this is a scheme that will see fruition in the near future. No Change It is considered that Y Felinheli has been Not Accepted categorised incorrectly and should be It is considered that the Deposit Plan included as a Local Service Centre under identifies sufficient, deliverable and Policy TAI15. Y Felinheli offers local appropriate housing land in the area and facilities and services including a primary the proposed change is not considered school, required to ensure the soundness of the 1024 AmcenLtd[3186] Map115-YFelinheli Object convenience store, post office and a plan. health centre and is located on a bus route linking the village with Caernarfon, Recommendation Bangor and Llandudno. It is considered Amending the development boundary is that there is an over-reliance on windfall not considered necessary to ensure the sites within the LDP. Land should be soundness of the Plan.

216 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan allocated for housing to accommodate the identified housing need. No Change

We wish to seek the following changes: 1. Y Felinheli to be categorised as Local Service Centre under Policy TAI15 2. Our site at Beach Road should be included within the development boundary of Y Felinheli and allocated for housing. Note the Support No additional growth is anticipated in Dwr Cymru Welsh Felinheli as the indicative housing growth 1333 Water (Mr Dewi Map115-YFelinheli Support Recommendation is provided for by completed units and Griffiths ) [2680] the existing landbank. No Change

CLUSTERS

Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Bodorgan is served by Malltraeth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1463 Water (Mr Dewi Map116-Bodorgan Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change * Bro larddur is served by Holyhead Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 117 - Bro Iarddur 1464 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation (Trearddur) Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change Dwr Cymru Welsh * Bryn Du is served by Rhosneigr Comments Noted 1465 Water (Mr Dewi Map 118 - Bryn Du Object Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with Griffiths ) [2680] The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage.

217 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan this catchment area would require improvements to the treatment works Recommendation which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change * Planning approval given for 12 units in the small hamlet of Bryn Du in 2014; Not Accepted * Anglesey's guidance on affordable It is considered that the Deposit Plan housing state that they should be sited in identifies sufficient, deliverable and settlements where there are public appropriate housing land in the area and the facilities to support them; Mr Thomas Conway proposed change is not considered required 1824 Map 118 - Bryn Du Object * Bryn Du does not have any facilities [3371] to ensure the soundness of the plan. other than limited stopping train service at Ty Croes railway and a limited bus Recommendation service; * The nearest settlement to Bryn Du is No Change Rhosneigr which is approximately 5 miles away. Old Llandegfan is served by Treborth Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require Map 119 - Old 1466 Water (Mr Dewi Object improvements to the treatment works Recommendation Llandegfan Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change * Brynrefail is served by Rhosneigr Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 120 - Brynrefail The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. 1467 Water (Mr Dewi Object (Anglesey) this catchment area would require Griffiths ) [2680] improvements to the treatment works Recommendation which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the

218 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions No Change * Bwlch Gwyn is served by Benllech Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 122 - Bwlch 1468 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Gwyn Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Not accepted In order to distribute the growth level of the Plan, a growth estimate must be given for the Clusters tier, which is 2 units in each Cluster.

In preparing the distribution strategy within the Plan, the Council considered the dispersed nature of the area against national policies for reducing the need to travel and Land at Capel Mawr. My client wishes to to locate the largest growth in sustainable include the attached plans into the new locations. deposit plan if possible as land available Mr Dafydd Edwards Map 124 – Capel 1016 Support for any possible development - I do not [3118] Mawr It is felt that distribution in the Deposit Plan have the policy numbers of inset maps has created a suitable balance between numbers to hand, is it possible to national policy and the local situation. Whilst complete this section again. a high growth level of growth in some locations can help somewhat with some local services, having a relaxed development boundary and a higher growth level would possibly lead to other problems within some communities e.g. impact on the Welsh language etc. The objector has not submitted valid reasons or clear evidence to be able to justify supporting an application to change Capel Mawr’s status in the

219 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan settlement tree.

Recommendation The proposed change is not required to ensure the soundness of the plan.

No Change * Cichle is served by Treborth Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1469 Water (Mr Dewi Map 128 - Cichle Object improvements to the treatment woks Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change Note the Support * Llangoed Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 129 - Haulfre (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1470 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation (Llangoed) flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Elim is served by Llanddeusant Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1471 Water (Mr Dewi Map 130 - Elim Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Glanyrafon is served by Llangoed Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1472 Water (Mr Dewi Map131-Glanyrafon Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Dwr Cymru Welsh * Glyn Garth is served by Treborth Comments Noted 1473 Water (Mr Dewi Map132-Glyngarth Object Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with Griffiths ) [2680] The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage.

220 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan this catchment area would require improvements at the treatment works Recommendation which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change Note the Support * Gaerwen Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 133 - Gaerwen (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1474 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Station flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area No Change * Hendre Hywel is served by Pentraeth Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require Map 135 - Hendre 1475 Water (Mr Dewi Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Hywel (Pentraeth) Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions No Change * Hermon is served by Malltraeth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1476 Water (Mr Dewi Map136-Hermon Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Llanddeusant Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 137 - Works (WwTW) which can accommodate 1477 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Llanddeusant the foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Llaneilian is served by Amlwch Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1478 Water (Mr Dewi Map138-Llaneilian Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the growth figure allocated for the

221 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan catchment area. No Change We wish to object to the exclusion of the Not accepted – this is a substantial (15 ha) Former Lairds Site, Llanfaes from the site on the edge of part of Llanfaes, 1.5km to allocated sites of the Deposit Plan and the east of Beaumaris. Most of the site may seek its allocation for mixed use be categorised as ‘brownfield’. Exclusion of a development. The site is a substantial woodland (covered by a TPO) leaves around brownfield site located in Llanfaes 13 ha. Part of the direct vehicular access approximately 1.5km to the north of the from Beaumaris to Llanfaes is along a road coastal town of Beaumaris. that is in a C2 flood risk zone, where there are known flooding events. It is considered that the site can be allocated for mixed use development The Plan does support the re-use of incorporating employment, commercial, brownfield sites. Nonetheless this support is leisure/ hotel and residential land uses subject to conformity with relevant policies (low, medium and higher density in the Plan, which include the need to align Excelsior Properties 932 Map 139 - Llanfaes Object with the Plan’s Settlement Hierarchy (Policy [3117] residential) providing a feasible and deliverable re-development proposal for PS5 and Policy PS15). the site. Part of the site could possibly be Llanfaes is categorised as a ‘Cluster’ in the developed to incorporate an area school Plan’s Settlement Hierarchy. The Plan’s and extra care elderly housing. This Strategy (Chapter 6) proposes “some brownfield site is considered a strategic development in Clusters, identified because site. This objection also covers Policy TAI of their functional links with Villages or 5 (local market housing) as it makes the Centres, and in the countryside”.In housing Plan unsound and undeliverable. terms, 25% of the Plan’s overall housing is The objector considers that the housing directed to villages, clusters and the target for Beaumaris can’t be achieved countryside. This then equates to 2 and therefore the hosuing should be re- affordable housing units to each Cluster directed to the Lairds site. The objector (Policy TAI 18). The Plan’s distribution also contends that the Plan’s overall strategy was agreed at the Pre-Deposit stage

222 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan housing figure is insufficient and the and then at the Deposit Stage. It has been absence of a housing allocation in informed by the Sustainability Appraisal, Llangoed and Llanddona should mean which in turn has been informed by the that more housing should be directed to Welsh Language Impact Assessment. Llanfaes. Although the objector has submitted a plan that seems to identify different use zones this approach isn’t substantiated/ informed by evidence to demonstrate each potential use’s deliverability. The proposal is therefore clearly speculative in nature.

The objection refers to the site’s potential to accommodate an area school. Policy ISA 2 (without prejudice) supports the development of new schools in Clusters, provided that other options have been explored. It is noted that the Council has yet to undertake the process to explore options to provide a new school in this sub area. On this basis, it would clearly be inappropriate for the Plan to allocate part of the site for a new school as it would pre-determine the outcome of another statutory process.

In terms of an extra care housing scheme, the Council is currently exploring different options to deliver an alternative provision in this sub area. Again, it would clearly be inappropriate for the Plan to pre-determine

223 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the results of this work. It is worth noting that relevant policies in the Plan could support an extra care proposal without an allocation, subject to appropriate evidence.

As referred to previously other potential uses (apart from housing) could align with relevant policies in the Plan should a proposal be brought forward during the Plan period. These uses (except for housing) could align with relevant policies, without requiring the site to be specifically allocated for such uses.

The proposal seeks to locate market housing and affordable housing on the site.

It should be noted that Llanfaes lies within a ward where the local market housing policy would apply (Policy TAI 15), which the objector is seeking to deviate from in relation to this site. Notwithstanding concerns about the level of housing in relation to the Plan’s Strategy, support for a mixed use development that includes housing in accordance with the objection would clearly undermine the Plan’s approach to facilitate homes for local communities.

No housing figure is provided by the

224 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan objector in his submission. In trying to clarify this position the objector has indicated that the proposed housing zone could equate to between 55 – 90 housing units. This clearly would be in excess of the number of units being facilitated by the Strategy and the Policy that deals with Clusters. The indicative figure referred to by the objector is based on diversion of housing units currently identified for Beaumaris to the proposed site on the basis that the settlement will not be able to accommodate this level of growth. The objector hasn’t been able to demonstrate that there is no capacity within Beaumaris for the indicative level of growth. Additionally, the objector challenges the Plan’s overall housing figure.

Bearing the above in mind, the site’s size, and the fact that there is no clear/ substantiated commitment to deliver other uses on the site, the site’s inclusion within the Plan as an allocation could equate to a substantial number of houses which would be over and above what accords with the Policy and the Strategy set out in the Plan. On the basis that Policy TAI 5 promotes local market housing in the ward that includes Beaumaris and Llanfaes, and the concern about the number of potential housing units

225 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the proposal would clearly undermine the Plan’s Growth and Spatial and therefore the Housing Strategy. This is considered be a fundamental change to the Plan to the extent that it would not meet the soundness tests.

The Committee’s attention is also drawn to a previous development plan Inspector’s report, which did not support residential development on the site. The Inspector’s report can be viewed on the website at http://www.anglesey.gov.uk/planning-and- waste/planning-policy/current-plans-and- policies/unitary-development- plan/inspectors-report-2004?redirect=false , which also deals with the site’s location with the AONB.

Given the reference to the site’s possible suitability as a site for a new school and/ or extra care housing the objection has been discussed with key officers within IACC. It is understood that the Council is exploring avenues to address the fact that Llanfaes includes a number of disadvantaged households. Within this context the site is seen as somewhere that could deliver new opportunities for the community on its doorstep. Additionally, Llanfaes is

226 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan considered to be a suburb of Beaumaris, having close social connections and should be categorised as one settlement in the hierarchy. Officers within the Council therefore consider that this approach provides a basis for the matter to be dealt with as a focussed change.

Nonetheless, as set out above, it is considered that the Plan could facilitate various types of development on the site without its allocation as a mixed use site. There is no evidence before the Unit to demonstrate the connection between the settlements that justifies recategorising Llanfaes, without undermining the Strategy set out in the Plan.

Recommendation

There is no compelling evidence to justify amending the Deposit Plan to allocate this site for a mixed use that includes housing. Such a change is considered to be a fundamental change that goes to the heart of the Plan, undermining the soundness of the Plan. The Plan could, with the provision of relevant evidence, facilitate the other uses put forward (except for housing) without allocating the site.

227 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan No change

Not Accepted Topic Paper 5 ‘Developing the Settlement Strategy’ outlines the methodology used to identify the role of different centres within the This policy defines the village of Llanfaes Plan area. as a cluster. A more appropriate categorisation would be as a local village, In order to distinguish between a Village and given its size and characteristics. There a Cluster, 9 specific facilities were identified as being essential, and are those defined by are discrepancies in the assessment the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation. To process which has been carried out, given ensure consistency and higher levels of that Talwrn for example, a settlement Mr Emyr Jones growth in a more sustainable centre, at least 383 Map 139 - Llanfaes Object similar in characteristics to Llanfaes, has one of these key facilities was essential. [2935] been defined as a local village. There is a need for both affordable and market Llanfaes has none of these specific facilities and therefore it has been categorised as a housing in Llanfaes to support and Cluster in the Plan. develop local services. The site identified as SP49 in the Candidate Site Register Recommendation would be a suitable site for small scale expansion of the village. There was no robust evidence to justify amending the Deposit Plan in order to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change * There are isolated incidents of flooding Comments Noted in the public sewerage system in Llanfaes The Councils will continue to engage with that may need to be resolved to allow DCWW at the planning application stage. development to proceed. Potential Dwr Cymru Welsh developers can either wait for DCWW to 1479 Water (Mr Dewi Map 139 - Llanfaes Object Recommendation resolve the flooding, subject to funding Griffiths ) [2680] No change is required to address the being approved by our regulator Ofwat, matters raised. or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of No Change the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of

228 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. * Llanfaes is served by Beaumaris Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1480 Water (Mr Dewi Map 139 - Llanfaes Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change * Llangadwaladr is served by Malltraeth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 141 - 1481 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Llangadwaladr Griffiths ) [2680] from the growth figure allocated for the catchment area No Change * Llansadwrn is served by Treborth Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1482 Water (Mr Dewi Map142-Llansadwrn Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions No Change Note the Support * Llynfaes Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1483 Water (Mr Dewi Map144-Llynfaes Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Mynydd Mechell is served by Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Llanfechell Wastewater Treatment Works Map 146 - Mynydd 1484 Water (Mr Dewi Support (WwTW) which can accommodate the Recommendation Mechell Griffiths ) [2680] foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

229 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Nebo is served by Amlwch Wastewater Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) which can Map 147 - Nebo 1485 Water (Mr Dewi Support accommodate the foul flows from the Recommendation (Anglesey) Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change * Penygroes is served by Llanddeusant Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 148 - Penygroes 1486 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation (Anglesey) Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change * Pen y Marian is served by Llangoed Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map149-Peny 1487 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Marian Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Pengorffwysa is served by Amlwch Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 150 - 1488 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Pengorffwysfa Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Penlon is served by Newborough Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1489 Water (Mr Dewi Map 151 - Penlon Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * There are isolated incidents of flooding Comments Noted in the public sewerage system in Pentre The Councils will continue to engage with Berw that may need to be resolved to DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh allow development to proceed. Potential Map 153 - Pentre 1490 Water (Mr Dewi Object developers can either wait for DCWW to Recommendation Berw Griffiths ) [2680] resolve the flooding, subject to funding No change is required to address the being approved by our regulator Ofwat, matters raised. or progress the improvements through the sewerage requisition provisions of No Change

230 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. * Pentre Berw is served by Gaerwen Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 153 - Pentre 1491 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Berw Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Comments Noted The Councils will continue to engage with * Bull Bay is served by Amlwch DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1492 Water (Mr Dewi Map 156 - Bull Bay Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure No change is required to address the allocated for this catchment area matters raised.

No Change * Rhoscefnhir is served by Pentraeth Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require Map 157 - 1493 Water (Mr Dewi Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Rhoscefnhir Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions No Change * Rhosmeirch is served by Llangefni Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1494 Water (Mr Dewi Map 158 - Rhosmeirch Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Rhostrehwfa has been classified as a Not Accepted Mr & Mrs O R & M Map 159 - cluster settlement despite having many Topic Paper 5 ‘Developing the Settlement 463 Object Roberts [2955] Rhostrehwfa of the characteristics of a local village. It Strategy’ outlines the methodology used to is important to the health and vitality of identify the role of different centres within the

231 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan the village that new housing is brought Plan area. forward on suitable site(s). The limitation imposed by cluster designation combined In order to distinguish between a Village and a Cluster, 9 specific facilities were identified with the tightly drawn boundary of such as being essential, and are those defined by designation will act to impede any the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation. To reasonable prospect of new housing ensure consistency and higher levels of development. Other local villages such as growth in a more sustainable centre, at least Llangristiolus, which displays many one of these key facilities was essential. similar characteristics, have a local village Rhostrehwfa has none of these specific designation. Suitable sites such as site ref facilities and therefore it has been SP163 on the Candidate Site register categorised as a Cluster in the Plan. should be included within a redrawn boundary. Recommendation

There was no robust evidence to justify amending the Deposit Plan in order to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change

* Rhostrehwfa is served by Llangefni Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 159 - 1495 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Rhostrehwfa Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Bryn y Mor is served by Holyhead Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 160 - Bryn yMor 1496 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation (Valley) Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Rhydwyn Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1497 Water (Mr Dewi Map161-Rhydwyn Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change

232 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Not Accepted In order to distribute the growth level of the Plan, a growth estimate must be given for the Clusters tier, which is 2 units in each Cluster.

In preparing the distribution strategy within the Plan, the Council considered the dispersed nature of the area against national policies for reducing the need to travel and to locate the largest growth in sustainable locations.

Request that the land edged red to be It is felt that distribution in the Deposit Plan included in the new plan for adoption. has created a suitable balance between national policy and the local situation. Whilst The proposed site is an infill between a high growth level of growth in some existing buildings of 'Dol Fraint' and locations can help somewhat with some local 'Dolwen' as stated in TAI 18. If agreed Mr Brian Owen services, having a relaxed development 1403 Map 162 - Star Object prepared to 2No units stated in your boundary and a higher growth level would [3108] policy. possibly lead to other problems within some communities e.g. impact on the Welsh language etc. The objector has not submitted To include land edged red in the new valid reasons or clear evidence to be able to 'Plan' for adoption to TAI 18 - Housing in justify supporting an application to change Clusters. Star’s status in the settlement tree.

No specific sites are identified within Clusters rather it is a criteria based policy that deems whether a site can be considered as suitable if the land is adjacent to a property coloured in red on the inset map.

Recommendation

No Change

Dwr Cymru Welsh * Star is served by Llanfairpwll 1498 Map 162 - Star Support Note the Support Water (Mr Dewi Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW)

233 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Griffiths ) [2680] can accommodate the foul flows from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Not Accepted Tynygongl has historically been identified as a separate settlement rather than a part of It is not clear why the development Benllech since there is a break in the built boundary for Benllech has been drawn to form from Benllech to Tynygongl. exclude the housing area around Topic Paper 5 ‘Developing the Settlement Tynygongl to the west. This forms part of Strategy’ outlines the methodology used to the urban area of Benllech and functions identify the role of different centres within the as part of the town. There is no logical Plan area. Mr B Pritchard reason to define this area as a cluster 450 Map166-Tynygongl Object [2951] village given its relationship with the rest Based on this methodology Tynygongl has of Benllech. Future housing development been identified as a Cluster within the Plan. within Benllech can be accommodated on Recommendation sites other than that shown on the proposals map, namely site SP161 on the There was no compelling evidence to justify Candidate Site register. This is suitable amending the Deposit Plan in order to ensure land for the expansion of the town. the soundness of the Plan. No Change

* Tynygongl is served by Benllech Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1499 Water (Mr Dewi Map166-Tynygongl Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change * Aberdesach is served by Pontllyfni Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1500 Water (Mr Dewi Map 167 - Aberdesach Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 168 - * Aberllefeni Wastewater Treatment Note the Support 1501 Support Water (Mr Dewi Aberllefenni Works (WwTW) can accommodate the

234 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Griffiths ) [2680] foul flows from the proposed growth Recommendation figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Bethesda Bach is served by Llanfaglan Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require Map 170 - Bethesda 1502 Water (Mr Dewi Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Bach Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change Note the Support * Bryncir Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1503 Water (Mr Dewi Map 171 - Bryncir Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Bryncroes Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1504 Water (Mr Dewi Map172-Bryncroes Support Recommendation foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Bryn Eglwys is served by Tregarth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 173 - Bryn 1505 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Eglwys Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * There are isolated incidents of flooding Comments Noted in the public sewerage system that, The Councils will continue to engage with Dwr Cymru Welsh depending on the location of the DCWW at the planning application stage. 1506 Water (Mr Dewi Map174-Bwlchtocyn Object development, may need to be resolved to Griffiths ) [2680] allow development to proceed. Potential Recommendation developers can either wait for DCWW to No change is required to address the resolve the flooding, subject to funding matters raised.

235 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan being approved by our regulator Ofwat, or progress the improvements through No Change the sewerage requisition provisions of the Water Industry Act 1991 or S106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990. * Bwlchtocyn is served by Abersoch Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1507 Water (Mr Dewi Map 174 - Bwlchtocyn Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Caerhun is served by Tregarth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 176 - Caerhun / 1508 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Waen Wen Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Capel Uchaf is served by Pontllyfni Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 177 - Capel 1509 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Uchaf Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Capel y Graig is served by Treborth Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require Map 178 - Capely 1510 Water (Mr Dewi Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Graig (Bangor) Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change Note the Support * Corris Uchaf Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 180 - Corris Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1511 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Uchaf foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change

236 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan * Crawiau is served by Llanrug Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1512 Water (Mr Dewi Map 181 - Crawia Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Bro Elidir Dinorwig Wastewater Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) can 1513 Water (Mr Dewi Map183-Dinorwig Support accommodate the foul flows from the Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Gallt y Foel is served by Deiniolen Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1514 Water (Mr Dewi Map185-GalltyFoel Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area No Change * Glasinfryn is served by Tregarth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1515 Water (Mr Dewi Map186-Glasinfryn Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Waunfawr Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 187 - Groeslon Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1516 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation (Waunfawr) foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change We would appreciate if the land that has Not Accepted been appended and outlined in red could In order to distribute the growth level of the be included in the local development plan Plan, a growth estimate must be given for the as it is a very suitable site to be Clusters tier, which is 2 units in each Cluster. Mr Alun Morris 1229 Map189-Llandderfel Object developed as an affordable home for a [2956] In preparing the distribution strategy within young couple who wish to remain in their the Plan, the Council considered the local communities. Only a very small dispersed nature of the area against national number of sites are being developed in policies for reducing the need to travel and to the rural village of Llandderfel, therefore, locate the largest growth in sustainable

237 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan including this land to build one affordable locations. home would not have a detrimental impact on the sensitive character It is felt that distribution in the Deposit Plan has created a suitable balance between (environmental and social) of the Village. national policy and the local situation. Whilst a high growth level of growth in some locations can help somewhat with some local services, having a relaxed development boundary and a higher growth level would possibly lead to other problems within some communities e.g. impact on the Welsh language etc. The objector has not submitted valid reasons or clear evidence to be able to justify supporting an application to change Star’s status in the settlement tree.

No specific sites are identified within Clusters rather it is a criteria based policy that deems whether a site can be considered as suitable if the land is adjacent to a property coloured in red on the inset map. the Plan being satisfied. Recommendation

No Change Note the Support * Llandderfel Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1517 Water (Mr Dewi Map 189 - Llandderfel Support Recommendation foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area No Change * Llanengan is served by Abersoch Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1518 Water (Mr Dewi Map190-Llanengan Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change 1519 Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 191 - Llanfor Support * Llanfor Wastewater Treatment Works Note the Support

238 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Water (Mr Dewi (WwTW) can accommodate the foul Griffiths ) [2680] flows from the proposed growth figure Recommendation allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Llaniestyn Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1520 Water (Mr Dewi Map193-Llaniestyn Support Recommendation foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Llanllechid is served by Bethesda Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1521 Water (Mr Dewi Map194-Llanllechid Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change Note the Support * Llannor Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1522 Water (Mr Dewi Map 195 - Llannor Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Llanwnda is served by Llanfaglan Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1523 Water (Mr Dewi Map196-Llanwnda Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change Map 197 - Llwyn We would like Bryn Tirion to be included Not accepted 1271 RI & C Jones [2147] Object Hudol within the Llwyn Hudol cluster. It is Topic Paper 5 ‘Developing the Settlement

239 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan already within the access road to 8 of the Strategy’ outlines the methodology used to existing dwellings. The site has been identify the role of different centres within the identified as SP760. Plan area. To be identified as a Cluster, there must be a cohesive group of 10 or more houses, with an operational link to a higher level centre based on its location on a bus route with a bus stop, or within 800 meters of a bus stop.

Bryn Tirion is not considered to form part of a cohesive group and therefore is not appropriate to be identified as a coloured building within the Cluster.

Recommendation There was no compelling evidence to justify amending the Deposit Plan in order to ensure the soundness of the Plan.

No Change * Llwyn Hudol is served by Pwllheli Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 197 - Llwyn 1524 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Hudol Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Machroes is served by Abersoch Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1525 Water (Mr Dewi Map198-Machroes Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Maes Tryfan is served by Llanfaglan Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 199 - Maes The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. 1526 Water (Mr Dewi Object Tryfan this catchment area would require Griffiths ) [2680] improvements at the treatment works Recommendation which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the

240 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan our Asset Management Planor matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change * Minffordd is served by Penrhyndeudraeth Wastewater Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) which can 1527 Water (Mr Dewi Map200-Minffordd Support Note the Support accommodate the foul flows from the Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. * Minffordd (Bangor) is served by Comments Noted Treborth Wastewater Treatment Works The Councils will continue to engage with (WwTW). The proposed growth being DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh promoted for this catchment area would Map 201 - Minffordd 1528 Water (Mr Dewi Object require improvements at the treatment Recommendation (Bangor) Griffiths ) [2680] works which would need to be funded No change is required to address the through our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions No Change * Mynydd Llandygai is served by Tregarth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) Map 202 - Mynydd 1529 Water (Mr Dewi Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Llandygai Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Nebo is served by Llanllyfni Wastewater Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) which can 1530 Water (Mr Dewi Map 203 - Nebo Support accommodate the foul flows from the Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Pantglas Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1531 Water (Mr Dewi Map204-PantGlas Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change 1532 Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 205 - Support * Pencaenewydd Wastewater Treatment Note the Support

241 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Water (Mr Dewi Pencaenewydd Works (WwTW) can accommodate the Griffiths ) [2680] foul flows from the proposed growth Recommendation figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Penmorfa is served by Porthmadog Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1533 Water (Mr Dewi Map206-Penmorfa Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Penrhos Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1534 Water (Mr Dewi Map207-Penrhos Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Pentir is served by Tregarth Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1535 Water (Mr Dewi Map 208 - Pentir Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Pentrefelin Dwyfor Wastewater Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) can 1536 Water (Mr Dewi Map 209-Pentrefelin Support accommodate the foul flows from the Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Pistyll Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1537 Water (Mr Dewi Map 210 - Pistyll Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change I wish for the SP157 section of land to be Not Accepted considered part of the Pontllyfni cluster. Ms Helena Jones In order to distribute the growth level of the 1274 Map211-Pontllyfni Object There is a need to extend the Deposit Plan, a growth estimate must be given for the [2864] Plan in order for Burnside and Dolwen to Clusters tier, which is 2 units in each Cluster. be earmarked red within the area.

242 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan In preparing the distribution strategy within The section of land in question is not the Plan, the Council considered the agricultural land. In the past, it was part dispersed nature of the area against national policies for reducing the need to travel and to of the garden of an adjacent house, locate the largest growth in sustainable namely Burnside. The land has a wide, locations. clear and convenient access. The land is surrounded by trees and it is not It is felt that distribution in the Deposit Plan intended to fell these trees. The location has created a suitable balance between of the land and the trees around it would national policy and the local situation. Whilst a high growth level of growth in some not disturb other views in the area, locations can help somewhat with some local should it be developed. There is currently services, having a relaxed development a garage and a caravan on the land with boundary and a higher growth level would facilities such as electricity, water, possibly lead to other problems within some sewerage and a phone line. communities e.g. impact on the Welsh language etc. The objector has not submitted valid reasons or clear evidence to be able to justify supporting an application to change Star’s status in the settlement tree.

No specific sites are identified within Clusters rather it is a criteria based policy that deems whether a site can be considered as suitable if the land is adjacent to a property coloured in red on the inset map.

Recommendation

No Change * Pontllyfni Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1538 Water (Mr Dewi Map211-Pontllyfni Support Note the Support foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. Dwr Cymru Welsh * Rhiw Wastewater Treatment Works 1539 Water (Mr Dewi Map 212 - Rhiw Support (WwTW) can accommodate the foul Note the Support Griffiths ) [2680] flows from the proposed growth figure

243 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan allocated for this catchment area. * Rhos Isaf is served by Llanfaglan Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1540 Water (Mr Dewi Map213-RhosIsaf Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change * Rhoslan Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1541 Water (Mr Dewi Map 214 - Rhoslan Support Note the Support flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. * Rhydyclafdy Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 215 - Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1542 Water (Mr Dewi Support Note the Support Rhydyclafdy foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area. * Saron is served by Llanfaglan Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require Map 216 - Sarn 1543 Water (Mr Dewi Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation (Llanwnda) Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change * Sling is served by Tregarth Wastewater Dwr Cymru Welsh Treatment Works (WwTW) which can 1544 Water (Mr Dewi Map 217 - Sling Support accommodate the foul flows from the Note the Support Griffiths ) [2680] proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. Dwr Cymru Welsh * Swan is served by Pontllyfni Note the Support 1545 Map 218 - Swan Support Water (Mr Dewi Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW)

244 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Griffiths ) [2680] which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Tai Lon Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1546 Water (Mr Dewi Map219-Tai'nLon Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change Note the Support * Talwaenydd Wastewater Treatment Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 220 - Works (WwTW) can accommodate the 1547 Water (Mr Dewi Support Recommendation Talwaenydd foul flows from the proposed growth Griffiths ) [2680] figure allocated for this catchment area No Change Note the Support * Talybont Wastewater Treatment Works Dwr Cymru Welsh (WwTW) can accommodate the foul 1548 Water (Mr Dewi Map221-Talybont Support Recommendation flows from the proposed growth figure Griffiths ) [2680] allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Tan y Coed is served by Llanrug Note the Support Dwr Cymru Welsh Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) 1549 Water (Mr Dewi Map222-TanyCoed Support which can accommodate the foul flows Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] from the proposed growth figure allocated for this catchment area. No Change * Ty'n-Lon is served by Llanfaglan Comments Noted Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. Dwr Cymru Welsh this catchment area would require 1550 Water (Mr Dewi Map 224 - Ty'n Lon Object improvements at the treatment works Recommendation Griffiths ) [2680] which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions. No Change Dwr Cymru Welsh Map 225 - Ty'n y Lon, * Ty'n y Lon is served by Treborth Comments Noted 1551 Object Water (Mr Dewi Treborth (Bangor) Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW). The Councils will continue to engage with

245 Rep Summary of Representation / Change(s) Name Section Type Comments and Recommendations ID to Plan Griffiths ) [2680] The proposed growth being promoted for DCWW at the planning application stage. this catchment area would require improvements at the treatment works Recommendation which would need to be funded through No change is required to address the our Asset Management Plan or matters raised. potentially earlier through developer contributions No Change Accepted Following a review of the group of houses Waun (Penisarwaun) consists of a tight suggested by the objector the Unit are cluster of 21 houses around Tai Arthur as satisfied that these are appropriate to be well as the more scattered development included as an additional group to form part of 10 houses shown on map 226. In of Waun (Penisarwaun). accordance with paragraph 7.4.129 "Inset MR Taliesyn Roberts Map 226 - Waun Plans are provided to identify the Recommendation 1398 Object [2711] (Penisarwaun) cohesive nature of each cluster with That the Plan be amended through the relevant buildings coloured to allow the identification of this group as a second assessment against the second criteria cohesive group that forms part of Waun within the policy", the cluster centred (Penisarwaun) in policy TAI 18 Clusters. This around Tai Arthur, Waun should be is to ensure consistency within the Plan. shown as inset Map 226. Focussed Change NF?

246