By Content/Topic
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Awareness and Utilization of Search Engines for Information Retrieval by Students of National Open University of Nigeria in Enugu Study Centre Library
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2020 Awareness and Utilization of Search Engines for Information Retrieval by Students of National Open University of Nigeria in Enugu Study Centre Library SUNDAY JUDE ONUH National Open University of Nigeria, [email protected] OGOEGBUNAM LOVETH EKWUEME National Open University of Nigeria, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons ONUH, SUNDAY JUDE and EKWUEME, OGOEGBUNAM LOVETH, "Awareness and Utilization of Search Engines for Information Retrieval by Students of National Open University of Nigeria in Enugu Study Centre Library" (2020). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 4650. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4650 Awareness and Utilization of Search Engines for Information Retrieval by Students of National Open University of Nigeria in Enugu Study Centre Library By Jude Sunday Onuh Enugu Study Centre Library National Open University of Nigeria [email protected] & Loveth Ogoegbunam Ekwueme Department of Library and Information Science National Open University of Nigeria [email protected] Abstract This study dwelt on awareness and utilization of search engines for information retrieval by students of National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) Enugu Study centre. Descriptive survey research was adopted for the study. Two research questions were drawn from the two purposes that guided the study. The population consists of 5855 undergraduate students of NOUN Enugu Study Centre. A sample size of 293 students was used as 5% of the entire population. -
PDF-Xchange Viewer
PDF-XChange Viewer © 2001-2011 Tracker Software Products Ltd North/South America, Australia, Asia: Tracker Software Products (Canada) Ltd., PO Box 79 Chemainus, BC V0R 1K0, Canada Sales & Admin Tel: Canada (+00) 1-250-324-1621 Fax: Canada (+00) 1-250-324-1623 European Office: 7 Beech Gardens Crawley Down., RH10 4JB Sussex, United Kingdom Sales Tel: +44 (0) 20 8555 1122 Fax: +001 250-324-1623 http://www.tracker-software.com [email protected] Support: [email protected] Support Forums: http://www.tracker-software.com/forum/ ©2001-2011 TRACKER SOFTWARE PRODUCTS II PDF-XChange Viewer v2.5x Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 7 IMPORTANT! FREE vs. PRO version ............................................................................................... 8 What Version Am I Running? ............................................................................................................................. 9 Safety Feature .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Notice! ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Files List ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Latest (available) Release Notes ................................................................................................. -
Gender and Information Literacy: Evaluation of Gender Differences in a Student Survey of Information Sources
Gender and Information Literacy: Evaluation of Gender Differences in a Student Survey of Information Sources Arthur Taylor and Heather A. Dalal Information literacy studies have shown that college students use a va- riety of information sources to perform research and commonly choose Internet sources over traditional library sources. Studies have also shown that students do not appear to understand the information quality issues concerning Internet information sources and may lack the information literacy skills to make good choices concerning the use of these sources. No studies currently provide clear guidance on how gender might influ- ence the information literacy skills of students. Such guidance could help improve information literacy instruction. This study used a survey of college-aged students to evaluate a subset of student information literacy skills in relation to Internet information sources. Analysis of the data collected provided strong indications of gender differences in information literacy skills. Female respondents ap- peared to be more discerning than males in evaluating Internet sources. Males appeared to be more confident in the credibility and accuracy of the results returned by search engines. Evaluation of other survey responses strengthened our finding of gender differentiation in informa- tion literacy skills. ollege students today have come of age surrounded by a sea of information delivered from an array of sources available at their fingertips at any time of the day or night. Studies have shown that the most common source of information for college-aged students is the Internet. Information gathered in this environment is most likely found using a commercial search engine that returns sources of dubious quality using an unknown algorithm. -
Goodbye Gutenberg NIEMAN REPORTS
NIEMAN REPORTS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 60 NO. 4 WINTER 2006 Five Dollars Goodbye Gutenberg rward • Building C g Fo omm hin un us it P y • • F ge in n d a in h g C O e h u t r g F n o i o s t n i n e g S • • E s x d r p o a n W d g i n n i g k O a u T r • R s e n a o c i t h c • e n C n o o n C v e w r e g i N n g g n o i r n o l t h p e x E W e • b ‘… to promote and elevate the standards of journalism’ —Agnes Wahl Nieman, the benefactor of the Nieman Foundation. Vol. 60 No. 4 NIEMAN REPORTS Winter 2006 THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY Publisher Bob Giles Editor Melissa Ludtke Assistant Editor Lois Fiore Editorial Assistant Sarah Hagedorn Design Editor Diane Novetsky Nieman Reports (USPS #430-650) is published Editorial in March, June, September and December Telephone: 617-496-6308 by the Nieman Foundation at Harvard University, E-Mail Address: One Francis Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138-2098. [email protected] Subscriptions/Business Internet Address: Telephone: 617-496-2968 www.nieman.harvard.edu E-Mail Address: [email protected] Copyright 2006 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Subscription $20 a year, $35 for two years; add $10 per year for foreign airmail. -
Social Media at Legal Division Programs Cont
Summer 2010 The Newsletter of the Legal Division of The Special Libraries Association Volume 17, Number 3 Social Media at Legal Inside Division Programs Social Media at Legal Division by Stephanie Davidson, (@stephdavidson), Head of Public Services & Assistant Programs Professor of Library Administration, University of Illinois College of Law Library, 2010 Stephanie Davidson . 1 Academic Law Librarian Grant Recipient Editor’s Notes Liz Smith . 2 As a new member of SLA and the about programs could be shared Legal Division and a first-time attendee between participants and attendees and From the Board Room Constance Ard . 3 of the SLA annual conference, there even with SLA members and others at were many programs that caught my home. The most interesting example Conference Review: BNA Breakfast and eye before I arrived in New Orleans. I observed during the conference was Legal Division Business Meeting Certainly all of this year’s Legal Division in the 10 AM Tuesday program slot, as Kami Bedard . 4 programs were of interest, though Steve I tweeted from Steve Arnold’s program Conference Review: “SPOTLIGHT Arnold’s “Emerging Technologies: Real- and simultaneously monitored tweets SESSION—Emerging Technologies: Time Search” and the panel on “Law from at least three other sessions. Real-time Search” Librarianship Off the Cuff,” were most Emily Rushing . 6 At the same time Steve Arnold’s “Real applicable to my work and experience Conference Review: “60 Sites in 60 level (“Cases, Codes & Context,” was Time Search” program was being held Minutes” marketed to non-law librarians). in the VirtualU Spotlight Session room Virginia M . -
Jeffrey Scudder Google Inc. March 28, 2007 Google Spreadsheets Automation Using Web Services
Jeffrey Scudder Google Inc. March 28, 2007 Google Spreadsheets Automation using Web Services Jeffrey Scudder Google Inc. March 28, 2007 2 Overview What is Google Spreadsheets? • Short Demo What is the Google Spreadsheets Data API? • Motivations (Why an API?) • Protocol design • Atom Publishing Protocols • GData • List feed deconstructed How do I use the Google Spreadsheets Data API? • Authentication • Longer Demo Questions 3 What is Google Spreadsheets? Let’s take a look 4 What is Google Spreadsheets? Why not ask why • Spreadsheets fits well with our mission… – “Organize My Information… and… – Make it Accessible and Useful… – With whomever I choose (and nobody else, thanks)” • In other words…. – Do-it-yourself Content Creation – Accepted/Familiar Interface of Spreadsheets and Documents – Accessibility from anywhere (…connected) – Easy-to-use Collaboration – Do-it-yourself Community Creation 5 What is the Google Spreadsheets Data API? Motivations • Foster development of specific-use apps • Allow users to create new UIs • To extend features offered • To integrate with 3rd party products • To offer new vertical applications 6 What is the Google Spreadsheets Data API? Protocol design based on existing open standards • Deciding on design principles – Use a RESTful approach – Reuse open standards – Reuse design from other Google APIs • The end result – REST web service based on GData – Data is in Atom XML and protocol based on the Atom Publishing Protocol (APP) – GData is based on Atom and APP and adds authentication, query semantics, and more -
Web Search Tutoring for the Local Community
Web search for local communities in the Highlands of Scotland: A self-tutoring guide MODULE III Alternatives to Google: some other search tools worth a try © Copyright Hans Zell Publishing Consultants 2011 Glais Bheinn, Lochcarron, Ross-shire IV54 8YB, Scotland, UK Email: [email protected] Web: www.hanszell.co.uk Web search for local communities in the Highlands of Scotland: A self-tutoring guide MODULE I How to get the most out of Google Web search MODULE II A concise guide to Google products, services, applications, and other offerings MODULE III Alternatives to Google: some other search tools worth a try MODULE IV The best of the Web: a guide to some of the most information-rich resources on the Internet 2 Introduction Google is a marvellous Web search tool and is as good as they get at present, but it is certainly not the only one. Other top search engines include Ask.com (aka as Ask Jeeves), Bing (formerly called MSN Search), and Yahoo! (and see General purpose, product, and visual search engines below). According to data published by Experian Hitwise http://www.hitwise.com/us/datacenter/main/dashboard-23984.html in June 2011, Google still heavily dominates the market with a share of about 68%, while the market share of Yahoo and Microsoft’s Bing currently is something just under 14% for both; Ask.com is in fourth place with around 2.6%, and AOL Search in fifth place with about 1.4%. The picture is roughly the same if ranked by number of visits, although Bing does better than Yahoo in this category. -
Final Study Report on CEF Automated Translation Value Proposition in the Context of the European LT Market/Ecosystem
Final study report on CEF Automated Translation value proposition in the context of the European LT market/ecosystem FINAL REPORT A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology by: Digital Single Market CEF AT value proposition in the context of the European LT market/ecosystem Final Study Report This study was carried out for the European Commission by Luc MEERTENS 2 Khalid CHOUKRI Stefania AGUZZI Andrejs VASILJEVS Internal identification Contract number: 2017/S 108-216374 SMART number: 2016/0103 DISCLAIMER By the European Commission, Directorate-General of Communications Networks, Content & Technology. The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. ISBN 978-92-76-00783-8 doi: 10.2759/142151 © European Union, 2019. All rights reserved. Certain parts are licensed under conditions to the EU. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 2 CEF AT value proposition in the context of the European LT market/ecosystem Final Study Report CONTENTS Table of figures ................................................................................................................................................ 7 List of tables .................................................................................................................................................. -
Lookeen Desktop Search
Lookeen Desktop Search Find your files faster! User Benefits Save time by simultaneously searching for documents on your hard drive, in file servers and the network. Lookeen can also search Outlook archives, the Exchange Search with fast and reliable Server and Public Folders. Advanced filters and wildcard options make search more Lookeen technology powerful. With Lookeen you’ll turn ‘search’ into ‘find’. You’ll be able to manage and organize large amounts of data efficiently. Employees will save valuable time usually Find your information in record spent searching to work on more important tasks. time thanks to real-time indexing Lookeen desktop search can also Search your desktop, Outlook be integrated into Outlook The search tool for Windows files and Exchange folders 10, 8, 7 and Vista simultaneously Ctrl+Ctrl is back: instantly launch Edit and save changes to Lookeen from documents in Lookeen preview anywhere on your desktop Save and re-use favorite queries and access them with short keys View all correspondence with individuals or groups at the push of a button Create one-click summaries of email correspondences Start saving time and money immediately For Companies Features Business Edition Desktop search software compatible with Powerful search in virtual environments like Compatible with standard and virtual Windows 10, 8, 7 and Vista Citrix and VMware desktops like Citrix, VMware and Terminal Servers. Simplified roll out through exten- Optional add-in to Microsoft Outlook 2016, Simple, user friendly interface gives users a sive group directives and ADM files. 2013, 2010, 2007 or 2003 and Office 365 unified view over multiple data sources Automatic indexing of all files on the hard Clear presentation of search results drive, network, file servers, Outlook PST/OST- Enterprise Edition Full fidelity preview option archives, Public Folders and the Exchange Scans additional external indexes. -
The SEO Battlefield WINNING STRATEGIES for SEARCH MARKETING PROGRAMS
The SEO Battlefield WINNING STRATEGIES FOR SEARCH MARKETING PROGRAMS Anne Ahola Ward The SEO Battlefield Winning Strategies for Search Marketing Programs Anne Ahola Ward Beijing Boston Farnham Sebastopol Tokyo The SEO Battlefield by Anne Ahola Ward Copyright © 2017 Anne Ward. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Published by O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472. O’Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. Online editions are also available for most titles (http://oreilly.com/safari). For more information, contact our corporate/insti‐ tutional sales department: 800-998-9938 or [email protected]. Editor: Meg Foley Indexer: Judy McConville Production Editor: Nicholas Adams Interior Designer: David Futato Copyeditor: Gillian McGarvey Cover Designer: Randy Comer Proofreader: Charles Roumeliotis Illustrator: Rebecca Demarest April 2017: First Edition Revision History for the First Edition 2017-03-21: First Release See http://oreilly.com/catalog/errata.csp?isbn=9781491958377 for release details. The O’Reilly logo is a registered trademark of O’Reilly Media, Inc. The SEO Battlefield, the cover image, and related trade dress are trademarks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. While the publisher and the author have used good faith efforts to ensure that the information and instructions contained in this work are accurate, the publisher and the author disclaim all responsibility for errors or omissions, including without limitation responsibility for damages resulting from the use of or reliance on this work. Use of the information and instructions contained in this work is at your own risk. If any code samples or other technology this work contains or describes is subject to open source licenses or the intellectual property rights of others, it is your responsibility to ensure that your use thereof complies with such licenses and/or rights. -
Query Expansion Based on Crowd Knowledge for Code Search
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, VOL. 9, NO. X, XXXXX 2016 1 Query Expansion Based on Crowd Knowledge for Code Search Liming Nie, He Jiang, Zhilei Ren, Zeyi Sun, and Xiaochen Li Abstract—As code search is a frequent developer activity in software development practices, improving the performance of code search is a critical task. In the text retrieval based search techniques employed in the code search, the term mismatch problem is a critical language issue for retrieval effectiveness. By reformulating the queries, query expansion provides effective ways to solve the term mismatch problem. In this paper, we propose Query Expansion based on Crowd Knowledge (QECK), a novel technique to improve the performance of code search algorithms. QECK identifies software-specific expansion words from the high quality pseudo relevance feedback question and answer pairs on Stack Overflow to automatically generate the expansion queries. Furthermore, we incorporate QECK in the classic Rocchio’s model, and propose QECK based code search method QECKRocchio. We conduct three experiments to evaluate our QECK technique and investigate QECKRocchio in a large-scale corpus containing real-world code snippets and a question and answer pair collection. The results show that QECK improves the performance of three code search algorithms by up to 64 percent in Precision, and 35 percent in NDCG. Meanwhile, compared with the state-of-the-art query expansion method, the improvement of QECKRocchio is 22 percent in Precision, and 16 percent in NDCG. Index Terms—Code search, crowd knowledge, query expansion, information retrieval, question & answer pair Ç 1INTRODUCTION ODE search is a frequent developer activity in software Obviously, it is not an easy task to formulate a good query, Cdevelopment practices, which has been a part of soft- which depends greatly on the experience of the developer and ware development for decades [47]. -
Statistics for Donauschwaben-Usa.Org (2010-10)
Statistics for donauschwaben-usa.org (2010-10) Statistics for: donauschwaben-usa.org Last Update: 01 Nov 2010 - 13:51 Reported period: Month Oct 2010 When: Monthly history Days of month Days of week Hours Who: Organizations Countries Full list Hosts Full list Last visit Unresolved IP Address Robots/Spiders visitors Full list Last visit Navigation: Visits duration File type Viewed Full list Entry Exit Operating Systems Versions Unknown Browsers Versions Unknown Referrers: Origin Referring search engines Referring sites Search Search Keyphrases Search Keywords Others: Miscellaneous HTTP Status codes Pages not found Summary Reported period Month Oct 2010 First visit 01 Oct 2010 - 00:05 Last visit 31 Oct 2010 - 23:59 Unique visitors Number of visits Pages Hits Bandwidth 4264 5044 16762 108013 9.02 GB Viewed traffic * (1.18 visits/visitor) (3.32 Pages/Visit) (21.41 Hits/Visit) (1875.41 KB/Visit) Not viewed traffic * 39400 45593 3.12 GB * Not viewed traffic includes traffic generated by robots, worms, or replies with special HTTP status codes. Monthly history Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 Month Unique visitors Number of visits Pages Hits Bandwidth Jan 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Feb 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Mar 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Apr 2010 0 0 0 0 0 May 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Jun 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Aug 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Sep 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Oct 2010 4264 5044 16762 108013 9.02 GB Nov 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Dec 2010 0 0 0 0 0 Total 4264 5044 16762 108013 9.02 GB Days of month 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08