The European Gas Market and the Outlook for LNG Demand in Europe (欧州ガス市場とLNG需要見通し)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The European Gas Market and the Outlook for LNG Demand in Europe (欧州ガス市場とLNG需要見通し) JOGMEC K Y M C JOGMEC London Office Oil & Gas Researcher Sangeeta Jordan アナリシス The European gas market and the outlook for LNG demand in Europe (欧州ガス市場とLNG需要見通し) Introduction Gas is a key source of energy in Europe’s *1 energy supply mix. Gas is supplied to Europe either via pipeline as natural gas or as frozen gas, liquefied natural gas(LNG), which is regasified in an LNG import(or regasification)terminal. Europe is expected to absorb the LNG surplus coming onto the market in the second half of the 2010s and early 2020s. However the region is facing many uncertainties. This paper focuses on Europe’s gas supply and demand dynamics. On the supply side, we will examine Europe’s domestic gas production, Europe’s key pipeline suppliers and the likelihood of new pipeline suppliers to Europe emerging over the next decade. In the second half of the paper, we will cover the demand side. We will focus on the sectors where demand uptake has occurred or is predicted and will show how gas demand growth in these sectors is determined to a large extent by government policies. Finally, the outlook for LNG growth in gas demand in the European market will be discussed. 1. Europe as the residual market for LNG In 2016, Europe’s net imports of LNG totalled 51 160 bcm of additional LNG with the existing bcm, which represented 15.3 per cent of the global infrastructure. However, there is a regional mismatch: LNG market(GIINL, 2017). Although LNG imports to regasification capacity is concentrated in Western Europe slowed down in the second half of 2016, Europe, along the Mediterranean and Atlantic Coasts Europe is still considered to be a significant market for while there is limited access to LNG in central and LNG. In 2015, eleven countries in Europe imported southeast Europe, due to the lack of LNG regasification LNG. Currently Europe has 29 LNG import terminals capacity and interconnectors. Weak interconnections in operation, with a total LNG regasification capacity of between EU countries are a major obstacle preventing 208 bcm(Standaert, 2016). The LNG import terminals LNG from flowing across the EU. Notwithstanding the are mainly large scale, but Floating Storage underutilization rate, 33 additional terminals are either Regasification Units(FSRUs)and small scale terminals currently under construction or planned(Table 1). are playing an increasingly important role in LNG For example, Italy’s New National Energy Strategy regasification(Table 1). (NES)lays out plans to develop an additional LNG As can be seen from the above, Europe currently terminal and increase storage capacity with the has an oversupply of regasification capacity and objective of increasing the liquidity of the Italian theoretically the region could receive approximately market and diversifying the country’s sources of 19 石油・天然ガスレビュー JOGMEC K Y M C アナリシス supply(Favasuli, 2017). Adding additional regasification Table1 Number of LNG import terminals per type capacity while terminals are practically idle has been criticised by many(Walstad, 2016)(LNG World News, Type Operational Under Construction Planned 2016). Nevertheless, it is suggested that the mere Large scale 24 3 23 FSRUs and others 2 0 11 availability of a regasification terminal may enhance Small-scale 4 4 4 the importer’s competitive position vis-a-vis pipeline Total 29 6 27 gas suppliers. It is hoped that the construction of Note:Figures may not add up due to overlap in categories. terminals in Central and Eastern European countries Source:Gas Infrastructure Europe could reduce dependency of these countries on Russian reopened in Europe in anticipation of the growing role gas supplies and improve price competition. LNG LNG will play in Europe’s energy supply(Financial terminals are also being expanded, constructed or Times, 2017). 2. Europe’s indigenous gas production The overall trend for European domestic gas natural gas production in 2012. With the exception of production is downwards. European gas production has Norway, the remaining European countries are faced fallen by 41% in the last decade and the BP Energy with declining domestic gas production. Outlook predicts domestic gas output to fall by 3.2% Norway’s production is expected to plateau and then per annum until 2035 as existing fields mature and are slowly decline post-2020. In the UK, gas production is not replaced(BP, 2017). In 2014, European domestic expected to decline, though the new supply from the gas production stood at 250 bcm, which was Culzean and Platypus fields due to come online from approximately 50 per cent of Europe’s gas 2019 will slow the rate of decline. Meanwhile in the requirements. However in 2016, according to Eurostat Netherlands, the Dutch government has been steadily data, European domestic production only accounted for reducing output from Europe’s largest field in approximately 30 percent of Europe’s gas supply. Groningen as a result of earthquakes and seismic Norway, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are tremors. Currently production at Groningen has been the three largest producers of natural gas in Europe, capped to 24 bcm per annum(Reuters, 2016), which is accounting for more than 80% of the region’s total more than halving the production from its 2014 peak. 3. Prospects for unconventional gas in Europe As a result of the decline in domestic conventional long term, with estimates of only 0.5 bcm in output by gas production, European countries have made 2030(Wood Mackenzie, 2016). Unconventional gas increasing recourse to unconventional gas production production was touted as being a“game changer” for in an attempt to increase energy security. However, Poland, as the estimated volume of 768 bcm of shale the prospects for unconventional gas production in reserves was considered to be sufficient to enable the Europe are not bright. According to Wood Mackenzie, country to realize its hopes of becoming energy the contribution of European shale gas production to independent of Russia(Tallents, 2011). However after the European supply mix will not be significant in the drilling 70 wells, commercial gas volumes were not 2017.5 Vol.51 No.3 20 JOGMEC K Y M C The European gas market and the outlook for LNG demand in Europe recovered and key international players ended up increasingly important role in supplying the European exiting shale gas exploration.*2 Other countries in the gas market(EIA, 2016). EU have imposed outright bans or moratoria on drilling Before we examine the outlook for LNG in Europe, and fracking.*3 we need to look at Europe’s current pipeline suppliers The future of unconventional gas production in the and the potential for additional gas supplies from other UK is still uncertain. Geological surveys suggest that pipeline suppliers. the UK has significant shale gas reserves(Delebarre et In 2015, approximately 87% of imported gas to al, 2017)and the UK government’s support for Europe was pipeline gas while LNG represented the unconventional gas production is strong(Ozawa, remaining 13%(European Commission, 2015). In 2015). Currently shale gas exploration is concentrated 2015, pipeline gas was supplied to Europe from Russia in three areas of the UK:Cheshire, East Midlands and (40%), Norway(37%), Algeria(7%)and Libya(2%) Yorkshire. Proponents of fracking argue that shale gas (European Commission, 2015). The top three pipe has the potential to provide the UK with greater suppliers of gas to Europe ramped up gas supplies in energy security, economic growth and job creation 2016 in an attempt to either maintain or increase opportunities. In an attempt to“revolutionise UK market share(Platts, 2017). In 2016 Russia increased manufacturing”*4 and to create energy security, the shipments to Europe and Turkey with exports petrochemical company, INEOS, has recently expanded reaching an estimated 185 bcm. Similarly, Norway in its shale gas licence portfolio, enabling the company to 2016 exported close to its record high from 2015 of carry out exploration over approximately one million 115 bcm. In an interview with Platts, Norway’s acres(400,000 hectares). Notwithstanding INEOS’ energy minister, Tord Lien, stated that“we have a large scale acquisition of shale licenses, there is very good understanding on the next 20 years where significant scepticism among many energy companies we expect to export on average 100 bcm per year. about the prospects for shale gas production in the UK. That is less than today, but it’s still high. It’s going to Concerns about the commercial viability of shale gas in still be more than 20% of the EU’s gas consumption.” the UK have been heightened after Engie divested all Gas exports from Algeria grew by 13 bcm in 2016 its shale gas assets in the UK(Ward, 2017). Further, from 38 bcm in 2015.*5 However, in the longer term, the considerable opposition to fracking by various Wood Mackenzie questions Norway’s ability to segments of the population is perceived to be a major maintain export levels at 100 bcm until 2035. obstacle to the development of unconventional gas Similarly, post 2020, Wood Mackenzie raises concerns production in the UK. It is widely considered that whether Algeria will be able to maintain its present unconventional gas production will not contribute export levels as output from maturing fields decline significantly to UK’s energy mix. (Wood Mackenzie, 2016). Thus, it can be seen that With declining domestic production and an uncertain there is uncertainty over how much gas Norway, future for unconventional gas production, gas imports Algeria and Libya will be able to supply Europe in the will rise in Europe. However, the volume, form and future, though Russia’s ability to ramp up supplies is source of the additional imports remains unclear.
Recommended publications
  • Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe's Fossil Fuel Subsidies
    Phase-out 2020 Monitoring Europe’s fossil fuel subsidies Ipek Gençsü, Maeve McLynn, Matthias Runkel, Markus Trilling, Laurie van der Burg, Leah Worrall, Shelagh Whitley, and Florian Zerzawy September 2017 Report partners ODI is the UK’s leading independent think tank on international development and humanitarian issues. Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe is Europe’s largest coalition working on climate and energy issues. Readers are encouraged to reproduce material for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. As copyright holders, ODI and Overseas Development Institute CAN Europe request due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For 203 Blackfriars Road CAN Europe online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. London SE1 8NJ Rue d’Edimbourg 26 The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not Tel +44 (0)20 7922 0300 1050 Brussels, Belgium necessarily represent the views of ODI or our partners. Fax +44 (0)20 7922 0399 Tel: +32 (0) 28944670 www.odi.org www.caneurope.org © Overseas Development Institute and CAN Europe 2017. This work is licensed [email protected] [email protected] under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). Cover photo: Oil refinery in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany – Ralf Vetterle (CC0 creative commons license). 2 Report Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for support and advice on the report from: Dave Jones of Sandbag UK, Colin Roche of Friends of the Earth Europe, Andrew Scott and Sejal Patel of the Overseas Development Institute, Helena Wright of E3G, and Andrew Murphy of Transport & Environment, and Alex Doukas of Oil Change International.
    [Show full text]
  • Decarbonization and Industrial Demand for Gas in Europe
    May 2019 Decarbonization and industrial demand for gas in Europe OIES PAPER: NG 146 Anouk Honoré The contents of this paper are the author's sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2019 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-139-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671396 2 Acknowledgements My grateful thanks to my colleagues at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES) for their support, and in particular James Henserson and Jonathan Stern for their helpful comments. A big thank you to all the sponsors of the Natural Gas Research Programme (OIES) for their constructive observations during our meetings, and a special thank you to Vincenzo Conforti (ENI) and his colleagues, who kindly read and commented on a previous version of this paper. I would also like to thank Catherine Gaunt for her careful reading and final editing of the paper. Last but certainly not least, many thanks to Kate Teasdale who made all the arrangements for the production of this paper. The contents of this paper do not necessarily represent the views of the OIES, of the sponsors of the Natural Gas Research Programme or of the people I have thanked in these acknowledgments.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Control in Europe. Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020
    Tobacco Control in Europe Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020 Tobacco Control in Europe Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020 Authors Dr. Katrin Schaller | Dipl.-Biol. Sarah Kahnert | Laura Graen, M. A. | Prof. Dr. Ute Mons | Dr. Nobila Ouédraogo This publication was funded by the Imprint Tobacco Control in Europe. Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020 © 2020 German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) Responsible for the Content German Cancer Research Center Unit Cancer Prevention and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control Dr. Katrin Schaller (head, comm.) Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 69120 Heidelberg Germany www.dkfz.de www.tabakkontrolle.de [email protected] Layout, Illustration, Typesetting Dipl.-Biol. Sarah Kahnert Cover Photo: © Alexander Marushin/Adobe Stock Suggested Citation German Cancer Research Center (ed.) (2020) Tobacco Control in Europe. Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020. Heidelberg, Germany This publication is an English translation of chapter 8 of the “Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020” (Tabakatlas Deutschland 2020. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, Germany, ISBN: 978-3-95853-638-8). To download the full publication (only available in German) go to https://www.dkfz.de/de/tabakkontrolle/Buecher_und_Berichte.html. Contents 1 The Tobacco Control Scale in Europe .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The European Offshore Wind Industry Key Trends and Statistics 2016 the European Offshore Wind Industry Key Trends and Statistics 2016 Published in January 2017
    The European offshore wind industry Key trends and statistics 2016 The European offshore wind industry Key trends and statistics 2016 Published in January 2017 windeurope.org This report summarises construction and financing activity in European offshore wind farms from 1 January to 31 December 2016. WindEurope regularly surveys the industry to determine the level of installations of foundations and turbines, and the subsequent dispatch of first power to the grid. The data includes demonstration sites and factors in decommissioning where it has occurred, representing net installations per site and country unless otherwise stated. Rounding of figures is at the discretion of the author. DISCLAIMER This publication contains information collected on a regular basis throughout the year and then verified with relevant members of the industry ahead of publication. Neither WindEurope, nor its members, nor their related entities are, by means of this publication, rendering professional advice or services. Neither WindEurope nor its members shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication. TEXT AND ANALYSIS: WindEurope Business Intelligence Andrew Ho (Construction highlights) Ariola Mbistrova (Financing highlights) EDITORS: Iván Pineda, WindEurope Pierre Tardieu, WindEurope DESIGN: Laia Miró, WindEurope FINANCE DATA: Clean Energy Pipeline, IJ Global. All currency conversions made at EUR/GBP 0.8194 and EUR/USD 1.1069 Figures include estimates for undisclosed values PHOTO COVER: Courtesy of ScottishPower Renewables Offshore Wind Farm: West of Duddon Sands, a joint venture between ScottishPower Renewables and DONG Energy MORE INFORMATION: [email protected] +32 2 213 18 68 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 6 1 ANNUAL MARKET IN 2016 ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Literacy Among Young Adults in Romania
    Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy Vol.6 (2018) no.3, pp.449-470; DOI 10.25019/MDKE/6.3.06 ISSN 2392-8042 (online) © Faculty of Management (SNSPA) Digital Literacy Among Young Adults in Romania Florinela MOCANU National University of Political Studies and Public Administration 30A Expozitiei Blvd., 012104 Bucharest, RO [email protected] Abstract. The present study has the purpose to analyze the digital behavior and the digital literacy among young adults in Romania. The first part of the paper investigates the literature studies regarding the essay’s subject, exposing concepts as reference group, social inclusion, groupthink, social façade, gadget and digital literacy. We are investigating also the perceived risks in the internet usage and the self-perception in handling digital devices. The research included three focus groups applied on young people from the 20-29 years old age cluster, urban residence in Romania. The main results exposed that both social media and technology have a central role in young people’s lives, by helping them ease communication, get to information and stay entertained. In choosing the platforms they use, it’s important the friendly interface, the range of activities they can do and the user profile in general, age and interest related. Results show that the participants perceive technology as having both positive and negative impact. They report that they do not perceive any major risks in using social media and that this matter wasn’t considered an issue when using a digital platform until now. The participants have a positive attitude about their digital skills and are declared open to learn new features.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on the European Border Regime: Mobilization, Contestation and the Role of Civil Society
    Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2017, Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 1–6 DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i3.1127 Editorial Perspectives on the European Border Regime: Mobilization, Contestation and the Role of Civil Society Eva Youkhana 1,* and Ove Sutter 2 1 Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Archeology and Cultural Anthropology, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 3 August 2017 | Published: 19 September 2017 Abstract This issue examines politics and practices that challenge the European border regime by contesting and negotiating asy- lum laws and regulations, practices of separation in refugee camps and accommodation centers, as much as political acts by undocumented migrants and activists seeking alternative ways of cohabitation. The different contributions all high- light the role of civil society initiatives during the migration movements in 2015 and 2016 in Europe by discussing critical perspectives on the European border regime and by looking at migration as a contesting political force. Topics related to mobilization and the appropriation of public spaces to actively declare one’s solidarity, political activism to contest borders and boundary-making approaches (no border movements) and the engagement into voluntary work are critically reflected. Keywords border; civil society; contestation; Europe; mobilization Issue This editorial is part of the thematic issue “Perspectives on the European border regime: mobilization, contestation, and the role of civil society,” edited by Ove Sutter and Eva Youkhana (University of Bonn, Germany). © 2017 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal).
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking Europe: the New Manufacturing As an Engine for Growth
    BLUEPRINT SERIES 26 REMAKING EUROPE: THE NEW MANUFACTURING AS AN ENGINE FOR GROWTH Reinhilde Veugelers, editor BRUEGEL BLUEPRINT SERIES VOLUME XXVI Remaking Europe: the new manufacturing as an engine for growth Reinhilde Veugelers, editor Editorial coordination: Stephen Gardner Production: Alessandro Borsello © Bruegel 2017. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted in the original language without explicit permission provided that the source is acknowledged. Opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author alone. Bruegel 33 rue de la Charité, Box 4 1210 Brussels, Belgium www.bruegel.org ISBN: 978-9-078910-44-2 Contents Foreword 11 1. Introduction: Europe and the new manufacturing 13 2. European and global manufacturing: trends,challenges 24 and the way ahead 3. The competitiveness of European industry in the digital era 53 4. Firm growth dynamics and productivity in Europe 79 5. A revival of manufacturing in Europe? Recent evidence 102 about reshoring 6. Manufacturing in central and eastern Europe 125 7. Europe’s comparative advantage in low-carbon technology 149 8. From big oil to big data? Perspectives on the European 177 energy industry of the future 9. Fintech in Europe: challenges and opportunities. 197 10. Strengthening cross-border e-commerce in the European Union 217 About the authors Carlo Altomonte is a professor of economics of European inte- gration at Bocconi University, Italy. His main areas of research are international trade and investment, the political economy of globali- sation and the process of European integration. He is as consultant for a number of international institutions, including the United Nations (UNCTAD), the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Central Bank, analysing international trade and invest- ment and their implications for competitiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2016
    EUPHA Newsletter 10 – 2016 Published: 22 December 2016 In this newsletter: 1. EUPHA update ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2. European Public Health Conference ....................................................................................................... 2 3. EUPHA members update .......................................................................................................................... 2 4. European Journal of Public Health .......................................................................................................... 3 5. Call for proposals, job opportunities ...................................................................................................... 7 6. Interesting news ........................................................................................................................................ 7 7. Upcoming courses and conferences ...................................................................................................... 9 8. Interesting publications .......................................................................................................................... 11 9. European Commission news ................................................................................................................. 12 10. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control news ............................................................ 13 1 1. EUPHA update EUPHA
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Power & Utilities in Europe
    Power & Utilities December 2017 Newsletter Power & Utilities in Europe Commodities Crude oil ($/bbl) The recovery in crude oil prices continued in Q4 2017, with prices closing the year at over $60 per barrel. This is the highest level reached since 2015 and can be attributed to supply-side efforts from OPEC, includingan extension of production cuts to the end of 2018 as announced by OPEC and Russia in late November 2017. OPEC’s efforts to scale back oil production were supported by pipeline disruptions in Libya and the North Sea which further reduced global supply. On the demand side, OPEC’s World Oil Outlook published in November 2017 forecasted oil consumption to increase to 103.2 million barrels per day in 2022 on the back of growing imports from China and India. On the other hand, the upward pressure on prices may have been partially offset by rising production among non-OPEC members. In particular, the US shale industry in Texas and New Mexico took advantage of recovering oil prices to expand production of shale oil. The uncertainty over Spot Brent Spot WTI Future Brent Future WTI the shale industry may be a reason for the modest downward trend in the Source Capital IQ forward curve towards the $60 per barrel mark by 2019. Gas (€/MWh) Gas prices exhibited a general upward trend in Q4 2017 and closed 2017 at around €20/MWh. The rise in gas prices was expected due to seasonally high demand for heating as winter in the Northern Hemisphere approached and temperatures dropped from the end of Q3 onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2016
    Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2016 2017 EUR 28707 EN This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. “Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2016” is a report published by the Joint Research Centre in collaboration with other Directorate Generals of the European Commission, including DG ENV, DG GROW and DG ECHO, and the national wildfire administrations of the countries in the Expert Group on Forest Fires (see list of contributors). Contact information Address: Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, TP 261, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy Email: [email protected] Tel.: +39 0332 78 6138 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc EUR 28707 EN PUBSY No. JRC107591 Print ISBN 978-92-79-71293-7 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2760/66820 PDF ISBN 978-92-79-71292-0 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/17690 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 © European Union, 2017 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, Accompanying the Document
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, COM(2019)1 final PART 1/4 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Energy prices and costs in Europe EN EN Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 10 1 ELECTRICITY PRICES ................................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PRICES .................................................................................................................. 13 1.1.1 Evolution of wholesale electricity prices .......................................................................................... 14 1.1.2 Factors impacting the evolution of wholesale prices ...................................................................... 18 1.1.3 International comparisons .............................................................................................................. 23 1.2 RETAIL ELECTRICITY PRICES ......................................................................................................................... 25 1.2.1 Household Electricity Prices ............................................................................................................. 29 1.2.2 Industrial Electricity Prices..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Glyphosate and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid (AMPA) in Agricultural Topsoils of the European Union
    STOTEN-24317; No of Pages 8 Science of the Total Environment xxx (2017) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Distribution of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in agricultural topsoils of the European Union Vera Silva a,⁎, Luca Montanarella b, Arwyn Jones b, Oihane Fernández-Ugalde b,HansG.J.Molc, Coen J. Ritsema a, Violette Geissen a a Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands b European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Land Resources Unit, Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, VA,Italy c RIKILT – Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands HIGHLIGHTS GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT • Data on occurrence and levels of glyph- osate residues in EU soils is very limited. • Glyphosate and its metabolite AMPA were tested in 317 EU agricultural top- soils. • 21% of the tested EU topsoils contained glyphosate, and 42% contained AMPA. • Both glyphosate and AMPA had a maxi- mum concentration in soil of 2 mg kg−1. • Some contaminated soils are in areas highly susceptible to water and wind erosion. article info abstract Article history: Approval for glyphosate-based herbicides in the European Union (EU) is under intense debate due to concern Received 10 August 2017 about their effects on the environment and human health. The occurrence of glyphosate residues in European Received in revised form 5 October 2017 water bodies is rather well documented whereas only few, fragmented and outdated information is available Accepted 10 October 2017 for European soils.
    [Show full text]