DOCSLIB.ORG

Tobacco Control in Europe. Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Tobacco Control in Europe Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020 Tobacco Control in Europe Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020 Authors Dr. Katrin Schaller | Dipl.-Biol. Sarah Kahnert | Laura Graen, M. A. | Prof. Dr. Ute Mons | Dr. Nobila Ouédraogo This publication was funded by the Imprint Tobacco Control in Europe. Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020 © 2020 German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) Responsible for the Content German Cancer Research Center Unit Cancer Prevention and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control Dr. Katrin Schaller (head, comm.) Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 69120 Heidelberg Germany www.dkfz.de www.tabakkontrolle.de [email protected] Layout, Illustration, Typesetting Dipl.-Biol. Sarah Kahnert Cover Photo: © Alexander Marushin/Adobe Stock Suggested Citation German Cancer Research Center (ed.) (2020) Tobacco Control in Europe. Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020. Heidelberg, Germany This publication is an English translation of chapter 8 of the “Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020” (Tabakatlas Deutschland 2020. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, Germany, ISBN: 978-3-95853-638-8). To download the full publication (only available in German) go to https://www.dkfz.de/de/tabakkontrolle/Buecher_und_Berichte.html. Contents 1 The Tobacco Control Scale in Europe ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Smoking Prevalence and Tobacco Control Measures in Europe .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 3 Smoking Prevalence in Children and Adolescents in Europe .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 4 Taxation in Europe ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 5 Smoke-Free Legislation in Europe ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 6 Health Warnings and Plain Packaging in Europe ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................12 7 Tobacco and E-Cigarette Advertising in Europe ................................................................................................................................................................................................................14 8 Smoking Cessation in Europe ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 9 Use and Regulation of E-Cigarettes in Europe ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................18 10 Use and Regulation of Heated Tobacco Products in Europe .........................................................................................................................................................................20 References and List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 Contents 1 The Tobacco Control Scale in Europe Since 2004, the Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) has been used to The United Kingdom and Ireland have always been at the top compare tobacco control activities in many European countries | of the scale and Germany has always been at the bottom | Developed by international tobacco control experts, the scale Hungary has intensified its tobacco control measures since 2010, assigns a score (number of points) to each tobacco control mea- rising from 27th place in 2010 to 8th place in 2019. In contrast, sure, with a higher score for measures that are highly effective Germany has been continuously downgraded since 2007 as it (e. g. high cigarette prices) and a lower score for those that are has not implemented significant tobacco control measures since less effective. When a country implements a measure in full, it then, and came last in 2019. In a European comparison, Ger- receives the full score. When it partially implements a measure, many is one of the countries with the greatest need for action in it receives only part of the maximum score. tobacco control. Measures to restrict tobacco industry interference (2)new since 2019 Not ratifying the FCTC (-1) 2 new since 2019 3 Measures to combat illicit tobacco trade (3)new since 2019 10 ■ ratication of the FCTC Illicit Trade Protocol (1)■ track and trace system (2) Price of cigarettes (30) 30 maximum score for 10 €/pack in 2018* Smoking cessation support (10) ■ quitline (2) 10 ■ medical smoking status recording (1)■ network of support (4) total ■ brief advice in primary care (1) ■ medication reimbursement (2) maximum Smoke-free public places (22) 100 points ■ workplaces (10) Health warning labels (10) ■ bars and restaurants (8) ■ plain packaging (4) ■ size (3) ■ pictorial health warnings (3) 13 ■ public transport (4) Comprehensive bans on advertising and promotion (13) 22 ■ TV and radio (2) ■ indirect advertising (1) ■ cinema (1) 10 Spending on campaigns (10) ■ outdoor advertising (2) ■ display ban (2) ■ sponsorship (1) maximum score for ■ print media (1.5) ■ point of sale (2) ■ internet (0.5) 2 €/capita in 2018** Maximum achievable score on the Tobacco Control Scale in 2019 | *weighted average price taking into account EU Purchasing Power Standards (PPS), **based on the average EU gross domestic product per capita expressed in PPS Points 2005 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 Price of cigarettes 20 19 17 14 13 14 Smoke-free public places 2 2 11 11 11 11 Spending on campaigns 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bans on advertising 4 5 4 4 4 4 Health warning labels 6 6 1 1 5 5 Smoking cessation support 4 5 4 2 4 4 Illicit tobacco trade – – – – – 2 Tobacco industry interference – – – – – 0 total rank/of 36 22/30 37 27/30 37 26/30 32 33/34 37 33/35 40 36/36 Points and rank of Germany in the TCS ranking in 2005, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2019 2 Tobacco Control in Europe Norway Iceland 5 66 4 70 Finland Sweden 6 62 15 52 United Estonia Kingdom 23 49 Russian 1 80 Denmark Latvia Federation 29 47 Poland 23 49 29 47 Ireland Netherlands 23 49 Lithuania 3 73 29 47 14 53 Germany Czechia Belgium 36 40 23 49 Slovakia Ukraine 10 58 Luxembourg Austria 32 46 20 50 34 44 France 20 50 Hungary Romania 8 59 2 74 Switzerland Slovenia 12 57 35 41 8 59 Croatia Serbia Bulgaria 17 51 33 45 Spain 27 48 Portugal Italy 10 58 Turkey 20 50 15 52 Greece 17 51 13 54 Malta Cyprus 17 51 27 48 TCS ranking of the European countries in 2019 Israel rank | points: 7 61 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 93 81 80 77 73 74 74 64 59 56 55 57 53 53 52 50 47 50 46 40 37 37 36 37 35 32 36 31 32 31 2005 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 Points for selected countries in the TCS ranking in 2005, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2019 | United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Austria, Germany Excerpt from the Tobacco Atlas Germany 2020 3 Smoking Prevalence and Tobacco Control Measures in Europe The proportion of smokers in the member states of the Euro- The better evidence-based tobacco control measures are imple- pean Union, including the United Kingdom, fell by an average mented in a country, the lower the proportion of smokers in the of 18.8 percent between 2006 and 2017 | However, according population and the higher the proportion of those who stop to a European-wide representative survey, there are very large smoking | In Germany, effective tobacco control measures were differences: In Sweden and the United Kingdom, the proportion implemented mainly between 2000 and 2009. No significant of smokers has more than halved, in four countries (Denmark, tobacco control measures have been taken since 2010 – apart Ireland, the Netherlands, Estonia) it has dropped by almost a from the implementation of European regulation such as the third or more and in four countries (Belgium, Hungary, Finland, Tobacco Products Directive. According to the European survey, Italy) by around a quarter. In Bulgaria and the Czech Republic, the the proportion of smokers in Germany mainly decreased proportion of smokers has not changed between 2006 and 2017 between 2008 and 2009 and there has been hardly any change and in five countries (Slovakia, Croatia, Portugal, France, Slovenia) since then. it has even increased. In 17 countries, the proportion of smokers has decreased more among men than among women, and in nine countries more among women than among men. EU 28 30 -7
Recommended publications
  • Heated Cigarettes: How States Can Avoid Getting Burned

    Heated Cigarettes: How States Can Avoid Getting Burned

    HEATED CIGARETTES: HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED 8/30/18 1 HEATED CIGARETTES HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED 8/30/18 2 THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW CENTER 8/30/18 3 8/30/18 4 LEGAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Legal Research Policy Development, Implementation, Defense Publications Trainings Direct Representation Lobby 8/30/18 5 HEATED CIGARETTES HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED • Presenters: – Kristy Marynak, MPP, Public Health Analyst, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Hudson Kingston, JD, LLM, Staff Attorney, Tobacco Control Legal Consortium at the Public Health Law Center 8/30/18 6 HEATED CIGARETTES HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED • Heated cigarettes on the global market • Distinguishing features 1. Heating at a temperature lower than conventional cigarettes that produce an inhalable aerosol • Heated Cigarettes: 450-700° F (generally) • Conventional cigarettes: 1250 – 1300 °F, • (max: 1500 °F) 2. Processed, commercial tobacco leaf is the nicotine source, flavor source, or both 8/30/18 7 HEATED CIGARETTES HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED Federal Regulation • Pre-Market Review • Modified Risk Tobacco Product Application • Vapeleaf 8/30/18 8 Heated Tobacco Products: Considerations for Public Health Policy and Practice KRISTY MARYNAK, MPP LEAD PUBLIC HEALTH ANALYST CDC OFFICE ON SMOKING AND HEALTH TOBACCO CONTROL LEGAL CONSORTIUM WEBINAR AUGUST 2018 8/30/18 9 What’s the public health importance of this topic? The landscape of tobacco products is continually changing By being proactive and anticipating new products, we can
  • Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe's Fossil Fuel Subsidies

    Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe's Fossil Fuel Subsidies

    Phase-out 2020 Monitoring Europe’s fossil fuel subsidies Ipek Gençsü, Maeve McLynn, Matthias Runkel, Markus Trilling, Laurie van der Burg, Leah Worrall, Shelagh Whitley, and Florian Zerzawy September 2017 Report partners ODI is the UK’s leading independent think tank on international development and humanitarian issues. Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe is Europe’s largest coalition working on climate and energy issues. Readers are encouraged to reproduce material for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. As copyright holders, ODI and Overseas Development Institute CAN Europe request due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For 203 Blackfriars Road CAN Europe online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. London SE1 8NJ Rue d’Edimbourg 26 The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not Tel +44 (0)20 7922 0300 1050 Brussels, Belgium necessarily represent the views of ODI or our partners. Fax +44 (0)20 7922 0399 Tel: +32 (0) 28944670 www.odi.org www.caneurope.org © Overseas Development Institute and CAN Europe 2017. This work is licensed [email protected] [email protected] under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). Cover photo: Oil refinery in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany – Ralf Vetterle (CC0 creative commons license). 2 Report Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for support and advice on the report from: Dave Jones of Sandbag UK, Colin Roche of Friends of the Earth Europe, Andrew Scott and Sejal Patel of the Overseas Development Institute, Helena Wright of E3G, and Andrew Murphy of Transport & Environment, and Alex Doukas of Oil Change International.
  • Robert K. Jackler Testimony.Pdf

    Robert K. Jackler Testimony.Pdf

    Brief Biography of Robert K. Jackler, MD: Dr. Jackler is a professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine and is a practicing surgeon. He is the founder and principal investigator of an interdisciplinary research group (Stanford Research Into The Impact of Tobacco Advertising or SRITA) which conducts research into the promotional activities of the tobacco industry. SRITA collected 56,600 original tobacco advertisements which were donated to the National Museum of American History of the Smithsonian Institution. A public exhibit at NMAH drawn from this collection opened in April 2019. SRITA maintains an extensive online tobacco advertising research database (tobacco.stanford.edu) which has over 813,000 unique users. As an academic research program, SRITA scholars conduct a wide spectrum of research into the promotional behaviors of the tobacco industry. SRITA focuses upon original scholarship utilizing the unique resource of our advertising collection. Our early academic focus was primarily an historical study of advertisements from the 20th century. In recent years, our research has focused upon the design and marketing of emerging tobacco products such as e-cigarettes (e.g. JUUL), heated tobacco (e.g. IQOS), and novel nicotine delivery systems. Our research is primarily designed to provide scientific data and analysis to inform regulators and legislators. SYNOPSIS OF OPINIONS: Today’s Tobacco Advertising Conveys the Same Messages as it Did in the 1950s: I suspect that most Americans think that the worst excesses of tobacco marketing lay in the 20th century when countless ads glorified smoking as glamorous and sexy and a worried public was reassured that “More Doctors Smoke Camels.” While the tobacco industry loudly claims they advertise ethically today, my in-depth study of tobacco advertising makes it clear that they still convey the same messages as during the earlier era.
  • SOUTH DAKOTA TOBACCO CONTROL STATE PLAN 2020-2025 SOUTH DAKOTA 600 East Capitol Avenue | Pierre, SD 57501 P605.773.3361 F605.773.5683 DEPARTMENT of HEALTH

    SOUTH DAKOTA TOBACCO CONTROL STATE PLAN 2020-2025 SOUTH DAKOTA 600 East Capitol Avenue | Pierre, SD 57501 P605.773.3361 F605.773.5683 DEPARTMENT of HEALTH

    SOUTH DAKOTA TOBACCO CONTROL STATE PLAN 2020-2025 SOUTH DAKOTA 600 East Capitol Avenue | Pierre, SD 57501 P605.773.3361 F605.773.5683 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Office of the Secretary March 2020 Dear Fellow South Dakotans: Tobacco use remains the single most preventable cause of disease and death in the United States and in South Dakota. Of all deaths in South Dakota in 2018, 18.8% were in part caused by tobacco use, including 17.7% of all heart disease deaths and 29% of cancer deaths. The South Dakota Department of Health and its partners are pleased to present the 2020-2025 Tobacco Control State Plan. The plan was developed in collaboration with Tobacco Control Program staff, key partners and stakeholders. The 2016 Surgeon General’s report, E-cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults called youth use of e-cigarettes an epidemic, and data from the 2019 National Youth Tobacco Survey shows 1 in 4 high school students use e-cigarettes. While cigarette use rates among high school students are at an all-time low, the rise in e-cigarettes has brought overall tobacco product use up. The South Dakota Tobacco Control Program is dedicated to decreasing e-cigarette use among youth in South Dakota and will act to protect our young people from all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. Smoking cessation improves health status and enhances quality of life. The 2020 Surgeon General’s report, Smoking Cessation: A Report of the Surgeon General, found that smoking cessation, at any age, is beneficial. Smoking places a substantial financial burden on smokers, healthcare systems, and society.
  • Decarbonization and Industrial Demand for Gas in Europe

    Decarbonization and Industrial Demand for Gas in Europe

    May 2019 Decarbonization and industrial demand for gas in Europe OIES PAPER: NG 146 Anouk Honoré The contents of this paper are the author's sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2019 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-139-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671396 2 Acknowledgements My grateful thanks to my colleagues at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES) for their support, and in particular James Henserson and Jonathan Stern for their helpful comments. A big thank you to all the sponsors of the Natural Gas Research Programme (OIES) for their constructive observations during our meetings, and a special thank you to Vincenzo Conforti (ENI) and his colleagues, who kindly read and commented on a previous version of this paper. I would also like to thank Catherine Gaunt for her careful reading and final editing of the paper. Last but certainly not least, many thanks to Kate Teasdale who made all the arrangements for the production of this paper. The contents of this paper do not necessarily represent the views of the OIES, of the sponsors of the Natural Gas Research Programme or of the people I have thanked in these acknowledgments.
  • Heated Tobacco Products (Htps) Information Sheet May 2018 WHO/NMH/PND/17.6

    Heated Tobacco Products (Htps) Information Sheet May 2018 WHO/NMH/PND/17.6

    HEATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS (HTPS) INFORMATION SHEET MAY 2018 WHO/NMH/PND/17.6 What is a heated tobacco product? Heated tobacco products are tobacco products that produce aerosols containing nicotine and other chemicals, which are inhaled by users, through the mouth. They contain the highly addictive substance nicotine (contained in the tobacco), which makes HTPs addictive. They also contain non-tobacco additives, and are often flavoured. HTPs mimic the behaviour of smoking conventional cigarettes, and some make use of specifically designed cigarettes to contain the tobacco for heating. What are some examples of HTPs? Where are HTPs marketed? There are a number of these tobacco products HTPs are marketed or planned to be marketed in available on several markets. Examples include close to forty countries as of September 2017*, iQOS from Philip Morris International, Ploom and based on the current trend, it is likely that TECH from Japan Tobacco International, Glo these tobacco products will be introduced in from British American Tobacco, and PAX from more countries. PAX Labs. Are HTPs electronic-cigarettes? How do HTPs work? No, HTPs are not e-cigarettes. HTPs heat tobacco In order to produce the nicotine-infused vapor, to generate nicotine. E-cigarettes heat e-liquid, HTPs heat tobacco up to 350°C (lower than 600°C which may or may not contain nicotine and in as in conventional cigarettes) using battery- most cases do not contain tobacco. powered heating-systems. The heating-system enclosed in a device, can be an external heat source to aerosolize nicotine from specially designed cigarettes (e.g. iQOS and Glo), or a heated sealed chamber to aerosolize nicotine directly from tobacco leaf (ex.
  • Vaping and E-Cigarettes: Adding Fuel to the Coronavirus Fire?

    Vaping and E-Cigarettes: Adding Fuel to the Coronavirus Fire?

    Vaping and e-cigarettes: Adding fuel to the coronavirus fire? abcnews.go.com/Health/vaping-cigarettes-adding-fuel-coronavirus-fire/story By Dr. Chloë E. Nunneley 26 March 2020, 17:04 6 min read Vaping and e-cigarettes: Adding fuel to the coronavirus fire?Because vaping can cause dangerous lung and respiratory problems, experts say it makes sense that the habit could aggravate the symptoms of COVID-19. New data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week warns that young people may be more impacted by COVID-19 than was initially thought, with patients under the age of 45 comprising more than a third of all cases, and one in five of those patients requiring hospitalization. Although scientists still don’t have good data to explain exactly why some young people are getting very sick from the novel coronavirus, some experts are now saying that the popularity of e-cigarettes and vaping could be making a bad situation even worse. Approximately one in four teens in the United States vapes or smokes e-cigarettes, with the FDA declaring the teenage use of these products a nationwide epidemic and the CDC warning about a life-threatening vaping illness called EVALI, or “E-cigarette or Vaping- Associated Lung Injury.” Public health experts believe that conventional cigarette smokers are likely to have more serious illness if they become infected with COVID-19, according to the World Health Organization. Because vaping can also cause dangerous lung and respiratory problems, 1/4 experts say it makes sense that the habit could aggravate the symptoms of COVID-19, although they will need longer-term studies to know for sure.
  • The Tobacco Industry, 2020

    The Tobacco Industry, 2020

    Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056358 on 9 December 2020. Downloaded from Editorial Framework Convention on Tobacco The tobacco industry, 2020: a snapshot Control includes Article 5.3, which urges governments to take measures to exclude Ruth E Malone the tobacco industry from such policy- making. It is needed now as much as ever. As Willemsen and Fooks show in a Tobacco Control as a journal has long been new products, which can serve as an early 3 study of tobacco control governance in focused not only on addressing the nega- warning of increased uptake. It may 13 the Netherlands, the tobacco industry tive disease-promoting impacts of tobacco also involve, as McKelvey and colleagues worked to try to shift governance of products but on the industry that produced illustrate in a study with youth,4 trying tobacco control in the Netherlands from them. From its inception, the journal has to navigate how the blunt instrument of the Ministry of Health to the Ministry had a normative aim. Tobacco Control is policy can address public perceptions of of Economics, regarded as more favour- focused primarily on research and analysis ‘reduced exposure’ and ‘reduced risk’ able to industry positions. The e-cigarette that advance understanding of how best to claims such as those now being made by industry seems determined to follow the develop, defend and extend public policy tobacco companies about a broad range same path. Ollila14 describes how govern- measures to protect the public from an of newer tobacco and nicotine products ment attempts in Finland to regulate e- cig- industry that promotes products that harm being marketed with minimal independent arettes have been thwarted by multiple and kill people.
  • The European Offshore Wind Industry Key Trends and Statistics 2016 the European Offshore Wind Industry Key Trends and Statistics 2016 Published in January 2017

    The European Offshore Wind Industry Key Trends and Statistics 2016 the European Offshore Wind Industry Key Trends and Statistics 2016 Published in January 2017

    The European offshore wind industry Key trends and statistics 2016 The European offshore wind industry Key trends and statistics 2016 Published in January 2017 windeurope.org This report summarises construction and financing activity in European offshore wind farms from 1 January to 31 December 2016. WindEurope regularly surveys the industry to determine the level of installations of foundations and turbines, and the subsequent dispatch of first power to the grid. The data includes demonstration sites and factors in decommissioning where it has occurred, representing net installations per site and country unless otherwise stated. Rounding of figures is at the discretion of the author. DISCLAIMER This publication contains information collected on a regular basis throughout the year and then verified with relevant members of the industry ahead of publication. Neither WindEurope, nor its members, nor their related entities are, by means of this publication, rendering professional advice or services. Neither WindEurope nor its members shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication. TEXT AND ANALYSIS: WindEurope Business Intelligence Andrew Ho (Construction highlights) Ariola Mbistrova (Financing highlights) EDITORS: Iván Pineda, WindEurope Pierre Tardieu, WindEurope DESIGN: Laia Miró, WindEurope FINANCE DATA: Clean Energy Pipeline, IJ Global. All currency conversions made at EUR/GBP 0.8194 and EUR/USD 1.1069 Figures include estimates for undisclosed values PHOTO COVER: Courtesy of ScottishPower Renewables Offshore Wind Farm: West of Duddon Sands, a joint venture between ScottishPower Renewables and DONG Energy MORE INFORMATION: [email protected] +32 2 213 18 68 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 6 1 ANNUAL MARKET IN 2016 ......................................................................................
  • Digital Literacy Among Young Adults in Romania

    Digital Literacy Among Young Adults in Romania

    Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy Vol.6 (2018) no.3, pp.449-470; DOI 10.25019/MDKE/6.3.06 ISSN 2392-8042 (online) © Faculty of Management (SNSPA) Digital Literacy Among Young Adults in Romania Florinela MOCANU National University of Political Studies and Public Administration 30A Expozitiei Blvd., 012104 Bucharest, RO [email protected] Abstract. The present study has the purpose to analyze the digital behavior and the digital literacy among young adults in Romania. The first part of the paper investigates the literature studies regarding the essay’s subject, exposing concepts as reference group, social inclusion, groupthink, social façade, gadget and digital literacy. We are investigating also the perceived risks in the internet usage and the self-perception in handling digital devices. The research included three focus groups applied on young people from the 20-29 years old age cluster, urban residence in Romania. The main results exposed that both social media and technology have a central role in young people’s lives, by helping them ease communication, get to information and stay entertained. In choosing the platforms they use, it’s important the friendly interface, the range of activities they can do and the user profile in general, age and interest related. Results show that the participants perceive technology as having both positive and negative impact. They report that they do not perceive any major risks in using social media and that this matter wasn’t considered an issue when using a digital platform until now. The participants have a positive attitude about their digital skills and are declared open to learn new features.
  • Exposure to Heated Tobacco Products and Adverse Health Effects, a Systematic Review

    Exposure to Heated Tobacco Products and Adverse Health Effects, a Systematic Review

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Exposure to Heated Tobacco Products and Adverse Health Effects, a Systematic Review Małgorzata Znyk * , Joanna Jurewicz and Dorota Kaleta Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] (J.J.); [email protected] (D.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-426-781-688 Abstract: Heated tobacco products (HTP) are a form of nicotine delivery intended to be an alternative to traditional cigarettes. HTP tobacco products are sold to consumers as a less harmful alternative to traditional cigarettes, both for users and bystanders. The actual impact of HTP on the health of users and its overall impact on public health is still not fully known. A systematic search of the literature was carried out to identify relevant studies published in English from 2015 to February 2021. The following databases were used: PubMed, Scopus, Elsevier and ClinicalKey. 25 studies (indepen- dent and sponsored by the tobacco industry) were considered. The analysis of exposure biomarkers and cardiovascular and respiratory biomarkers showed differences between smokers and people using heated tobacco products. Improvements in clinically relevant risk markers, especially choles- terol, sICAM-1, 8-epi-PGF2α, 11-DTX-B2, HDL and FEV1, were observed compared to persistent cigarette smokers. On the other hand, exposure to IQOS has been reported to alter mitochondrial function, which may further exaggerate airway inflammation, airway remodeling and lung cancer. These products have the potential to increase oxidative stress and increase respiratory tract infections Citation: Znyk, M.; Jurewicz, J.; by increasing microbial adherence to the respiratory tract.
  • Trends in Use of E-Cigarette Device Types and Heated Tobacco Products

    Trends in Use of E-Cigarette Device Types and Heated Tobacco Products

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Trends in use of e‑cigarette device types and heated tobacco products from 2016 to 2020 in England Harry Tattan‑Birch*, Jamie Brown, Lion Shahab & Sarah E. Jackson This study examined use trends of e‑cigarette devices types, heated tobacco products (HTPs) and e‑liquid nicotine concentrations in England from 2016 to 2020. Data were from a representative repeat cross‑sectional survey of adults aged 16 or older. Bayesian logistic regression was used to estimate proportions and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Of 75,355 participants, 5.3% (weighted = 5.5%) were currently using e‑cigarettes or HTPs, with the majority (98.7%) using e‑cigarettes. Among e‑cigarette users, 53.7% (CrI 52.0–55.1%) used tank devices, 23.7% (22.4–25.1%) mods, 17.3% (16.1–18.4%) pods, and 5.4% (4.7–6.2%) disposables. Tanks were the most widely used device type throughout 2016– 2020. Mods were second until 2020, when pods overtook them. Among all e‑cigarette/HTP users, prevalence of HTP use remains rare (3.4% in 2016 versus 4.2% in 2020), whereas JUUL use has risen from 3.4% in 2018 to 11.8% in 2020. Across all years, nicotine concentrations of ≤ 6 mg/ml were most widely (41.0%; 39.4–42.4%) and ≥ 20 mg/ml least widely used (4.1%; 3.4–4.9%). Among e‑cigarette/ HTP users, ex‑smokers were more likely than current smokers to use mod and tank e‑cigarettes, but less likely to use pods, disposables, JUUL and HTPs.