Supplementary Materials: Valence Politics and Electoral Choice in a New Democracy: the Case of Taiwan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supplementary Materials: Valence Politics and Electoral Choice in a New Democracy: the Case of Taiwan Supplementary Materials: Valence Politics and Electoral Choice in a New Democracy: The Case of Taiwan Karl Ho, [email protected], School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas; Harold D. Clarke, [email protected], School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas and Department of Government, University of Essex; Li‐Khan Chen, [email protected], Department of Political Science, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan; Dennis Lu‐Chung Weng, [email protected], School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas Version: January 27, 2013 Appendix—List of Variables Vote=f(national leader image, local leader image, central government performance, local government performance, president’s cross-strait policy, partisanship, party preference on handling most important issues, economic evaluations, national identity, citizenship, socio-demographics) Var.Name Variable Label Values Label Missing Value treatment Vote* Which ticket did you vote for? 01 Frank HSIEH and SU Tseng-chang 91forgot 02 MA Ying-jeou and Vincent SIEW 94 cast an invalid vote 95 refuse to answer 98 don’t know 99 skip recoded to separate categories including “refused to answer”, “non-voter” National How would you rate Frank HSIEH using 0 to 00 you dislike him very much 95 refuse to answer Leader Image 10 scale? 01 96 it’s hard to say 02 97 no opinion 03 98 don’t know 04 05 Mean substitution 06 07 08 09 10 you like him very much. National How would you rate MA Ying-jeou 00 you dislike him very much 95 refuse to answer Leader Image using 0 to 10 scale? 01 96 it’s hard to say 02 97 no opinion 03 98 don’t know 04 05 Mean substitution 06 07 08 09 10 you like him very much. Local Leader Image What’s your feeling toward Hau, Lung-bin? 00 you dislike him very much 95. refuse to answer (Mayor of Taipei) 01 96. it’s hard to say _______ 02 97. no opinion 03 98. don’t know 04 05 Mean substitution 06 07 08 09 10 you like him very much. Local Leader Image What’s your feeling toward Hu, Jason ? 00 you dislike him very much 95. refuse to answer (Mayor of Tai-Chung) 01 96. it’s hard to say _______ 02 97. no opinion 03 98. don’t know 04 05 Mean substitution 06 07 08 09 10 you like him very much. Local Leader Image What’s your feeling toward Chen, Chu ? 00 you dislike her very much 95. refuse to answer (Mayor of Kaohsiung) 01 96. it’s hard to say _______ 02 97. no opinion 03 98. don’t know 04 05 Mean substitution 06 07 08 09 10 you like her very much. Central Government Concerning Chen, Shui-bian’s overall 01 very satisfied 95 refuse to answer Performance performance during his presidency, are you 02 somewhat satisfied 96 it depends (2008 Presidential very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat 03 somewhat dissatisfied 97 no opinion Election Survey) dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied? 04 very dissatisfied 98 don’t know recoded to middle category of restructured 5-point scale Central Government How satisfied are you with the overall 01. very satisfied 95. refuse to answer Performance performance of the central government under 02. satisfied 96. it depends (2010 Mayoral the KMT over the last two and half years? 03. somewhat dissatisfied 97. no opinion Election Election 04. very dissatisfied 98. don’t know Survey) recoded to middle category of restructured 5-point scale Local Government Overall, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with 01. very satisfied 95. refuse to answer Performance the performance of the Taipei City mayor over 02. somewhat satisfied 96. it depends the past four years? 03. somewhat dissatisfied 97. no opinion 04. very dissatisfied 98. don’t know recoded to middle category of restructured 5-point scale Local Government Overall, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with 01. very satisfied 95. refuse to answer Performance the performance of the Taichung City mayor 02. somewhat satisfied 96. it depends over the past four years? 03. somewhat dissatisfied 97. no opinion 04. very dissatisfied 98. don’t know recoded to middle category of restructured 5-point scale Local Government Overall, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with 01. very satisfied 95. refuse to answer Performance the performance of the Kaohsiung City mayor 02. somewhat satisfied 96. it depends over the past four years? 03. somewhat dissatisfied 97. no opinion 04. very dissatisfied 98. don’t know recoded to middle category of restructured 5-point scale President’s Due to President Ma’s cross-strait trade 01. better 93. don’t know Cross-strait Policy policies, do you think Taiwan’s economy has 02. worse President Ma’s gotten better, worse or is about the same? 03. about the same cross-strait trade policies 95. refuse to answer 96. it depends 97. no opinion 98. don’t know recoded to middle category Party Identification Which party is that? 01 KMT 95 refuse to answer (Partisanship) 02 DPP 96 it’s hard to say 03 NP 98 don’t know 04 PFP 05 TSU Recoded to “others” 06 Green Party Taiwan category 07 Home Party Party Preference Now we’d like to understand your opinions 00 dislike it very much 95 refuse to answer about each of the political parties. If 0 means 01 98 don’t know you dislike a party very much, and 10 means 02 you like that party very much, what number 03 would you give the KMT? 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 like it very much. Party Preference What about the DPP? 00 dislike it very much 95 refuse to answer 01 98 don’t know 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 like it very much. Candidate best at Which candidate best at most important issue? Candidate names 91 all issue 92 neither 95 refuse to answer 96 it's hard to say 97 no opinion 98 don't know 99 skip recoded to zero Economic Would you say that over the past year, the state 01 better 96 it depends Evaluations of the economy of Taiwan has gotten better, 02 about the same 97 no opinion (Retrospective - stayed about the same, or gotten worse? 03 worse 98 don’t know National) recoded to middle category Economic Would you say that in the forthcoming year, 01 better 95 refuse to answer Evaluations the state of the economy of Taiwan will get 02 about the same 96 it depends (Perspective - better, stay about the same, or get worse? 03 worse 97 no opinion National) 98 don’t know recoded to middle category Economic Would you say that over the past year, your 01 better 95 refuse to answer Evaluations own household’s economic condition has 02 about the same 96 it depends (Retrospective - gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten 03 worse 97 no opinion Personal) worse? 98 don’t know recoded to middle category Economic Would you say that in the forthcoming year, 01 better 95 refuse to answer Evaluations your own household’s economic condition will 02 about the same 96 it depends (Perspective - get better, stay about the same, or get worse? 03 worse 97 no opinion Personal) 98 don’t know recoded to middle category National Identity Concerning the relationship between Taiwan 1 immediate unification 7 it's depended by (Independence/Unific and mainland China, which of the following six 2 immediate independence government ation) positions do you agree with: 1) immediate 3 maintain the status quo, move toward 8 nothing about China9 unification, 2) immediate independence, 3) unification in the future one country two maintain the status quo, move toward 4 maintain the status quo, move toward systems unification in the future, 4) maintain the independence in the future 95 refuse to answer 5 maintain the status quo, decide either 96 it depends unification or indepe ndence, 97 it's hard to say 6 maintain the status quo forever 98 don't know Recoded into three (Indep, Unify and Status recoded to zeros in Quo) dichotomous variables dichotomous variables Citizenship: C1. Some people say, “People like me don’t 01. strongly agree 95. refuse to answer Political Efficacy have any say about what the government does.” 02. agree 96. it depends Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 03. disagree 97. no opinion C2. Some people say, “Government officials 04. strongly disagree 98. don’t know do not care much about what people like me think.” Do you agree or disagree with this recoded to middle statement? category C3. Some people say, “Sometimes politics seems so complicated that a person like me cannot really understand what is going on.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Citizenship: D1. Some people say, “Most decisions made 01. strongly believe 95. refuse to answer Political Trust by the government are correct.” Do you agree 02. believe 96. it depends or disagree with this statement? 03. not believe much 97. no opinion D2. Some people say, “Government officials 04. not believe at all 98. don’t know often waste taxpayers’ money.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? recoded to middle D3. When the government decides important category policies, do you think “popular welfare” is its first priority? Is it often, sometimes, seldom, or never? D4. Do you believe what government officials say? Do you strongly believe them, believe them, not believe them much, or not believe them at all? Citizenship: A1. During last year’s campaign, some people 01. less than 30 minutes 95.
Recommended publications
  • Here Are to Subscribe, Visit Several Factors That Militate Against This Move
    Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 5 Global Taiwan Brief Vol 5. Issue1 5 KMT Elects New Chairman in Attempt to Regain Youth Votes By: Russell Hsiao and Ingrid Bodeen Implications of Coronavirus Outbreak on Taiwan’s Campaign for the World Health Organization By: I-wei Jennifer Chang Reinvigorating Taiwan’s Role as Asia’s NGO Hub By: J. Michael Cole An American Perspective on Australia’s Approach to the Taiwan Strait By: Michael Mazza Potential Downsides to US-China Trade Tensions on Taiwan’s Economy By: Ali Wyne KMT Elects New Chairman in Attempt to Regain Youth Votes The Global Taiwan Brief is a bi-week- ly publication released every other By: Russell Hsiao and Ingrid Bodeen Wednesday and provides insight into Russell Hsiao is the executive director of the Global Taiwan Institute and the editor-in-chief the latest news on Taiwan. of the Global Taiwan Brief. Ingrid Bodeen is currently a student at George Washington Editor-in-Chief University and an intern at the Global Taiwan Institute. Russell Hsiao In the first significant temperature taken of the political climate within Taiwan after the Staff Editor Katherine Schultz January 2020 presidential and legislative elections, the Nationalist Party (Kuomintang Copy Editor or KMT) held a special by-election on March 7 to elect the Party’s new chairman. Eligi- Marshall Reid ble party members had to choose between two candidates: former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌, b. 1952) and legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣, b. 1972). The elec- The views and opinions expressed tion—scheduled after the former chairman and members of the Party’s Central Standing in these articles are those of the Committee (CSC) resigned—saw Chiang emerge as the clear victor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan Independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Dalei Jie University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Jie, Dalei, "The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 524. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Abstract How to explain the rise and fall of the Taiwan independence policy? As the Taiwan Strait is still the only conceivable scenario where a major power war can break out and Taiwan's words and deeds can significantly affect the prospect of a cross-strait military conflict, ot answer this question is not just a scholarly inquiry. I define the aiwanT independence policy as internal political moves by the Taiwanese government to establish Taiwan as a separate and sovereign political entity on the world stage. Although two existing prevailing explanations--electoral politics and shifting identity--have some merits, they are inadequate to explain policy change over the past twenty years. Instead, I argue that there is strategic rationale for Taiwan to assert a separate sovereignty. Sovereignty assertions are attempts to substitute normative power--the international consensus on the sanctity of sovereignty--for a shortfall in military- economic-diplomatic assets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Social Movements on Taiwan's Democracy
    Journal of Current Chinese Affairs China aktuell Philion, Stephen (2010), The Impact of Social Movements on Taiwan’s Democracy,, in: Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39, 3, 149-163. ISSN: 1868-4874 (online), ISSN: 1868-1026 (print) The online version of this and the other articles can be found at: <www.CurrentChineseAffairs.org> Published by GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Institute of Asian Studies in cooperation with the National Institute of Chinese Studies, White Rose East Asia Centre at the Universities of Leeds and Sheffield and Hamburg University Press. The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs is an Open Access publication. It may be read, copied and distributed free of charge according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. To subscribe to the print edition: <[email protected]> For an e-mail alert please register at: <www.CurrentChineseAffairs.org> The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs is part of the GIGA Journal Family which includes: Africa Spectrum • Journal of Current Chinese Affairs • Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs • Journal of Politics in Latin America • <www.giga-journal-family.org> Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 3/2010: 149-163 The Impact of Social Movements on Taiwan’s Democracy Stephen Philion Abstract: This article discusses and critiques the four articles that com- prise this volume on Taiwan’s social movement and democratization. I argue that the four articles suggest that while Taiwan’s social movements have made a clear impact on Taiwan’s democratization, they remain challenged by the neo-liberal orientation of elected governments, in both KMT and DPP forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Propaganda in Taiwan: Where Digital Democracy Meets Automated Autocracy
    Working Paper No. 2017.2 Computational Propaganda in Taiwan: Where Digital Democracy Meets Automated Autocracy Nicholas J. Monaco, Google Jigsaw Table of Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 3 Case study ................................................................................................................... 5 Media and social media landscape in Taiwan ................................................................... 5 Overview of computational propaganda in Taiwan .......................................................... 9 Automation and propaganda .......................................................................................... 10 Fake news ........................................................................................................................ 13 Cross-Strait propaganda ................................................................................................. 15 The 2016 Diba Facebook expedition .............................................................................. 22 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 25 About the Author ...................................................................................................... 27 References ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Voting Shift in the November 2014 Local Elections in Taiwan
    Current affairs China perspectives Voting Shift in the November 2014 Local Elections in Taiwan Strong rebuke to Ma Ying-jeou's government and policies and landslide victory for the DPP. FRANK MUYARD n 29 November 2014, Taiwan held the largest series of local elections policies, including its trumpeted cross-strait economic and political rap - in its history, in a nine-in-one format combining polls for 11,130 po - prochement, left the KMT candidates with few national or local policy Ositions, ranging from mayors of municipalities and cities achievements to run with. In many cases, Ma was seen as so politically toxic (zhixiashi/shizhang 直轄市 /市長 ), county magistrates ( xianzhang 縣長 ), city that candidates declined to stand with him on a public stage. In a desperate and county councillors ( shi/xian yihuiyuan 市/縣議會員 ), township chiefs attempt, Lien Sheng-wen and the KMT tried to nationalise and polarise the (zhenzhang 鎮長 , xiangzhang 鄉長 ), and village and borough chiefs ( cunzhang campaign into a classic Blue-Green battle around cross-strait relations and 村長 , lizhang 里長 ), to indigenous district chiefs and councillors ( zhixiashi identity, pushing the “save the Republic of China (ROC)” card to rally deep- shandi yuanzhumin quzhang , qumin daibiao 直轄市山地原住民區長,區民 Blue voters and prop up their campaign. It had the mostly opposite result 代表 ). All were elected for four-year terms. Two-and-a-half years into the sec - of showing even more clearly the disconnect between today’s mainstream ond presidential term of Ma Ying-jeou, the nation-wide elections were seen national Taiwanese identity and the KMT mainlander old guard such as for - as a mid-term test for his administration and a prelude to the next legislative mer premiers Hau Pei-tsun 郝柏村 and Lien Chan, aggravated by repeated and presidential elections in early 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2008 and the Future of Cross-Strait Relations
    Romberg, China Leadership Monitor, No. 21 Election 2008 and the Future of Cross-Strait Relations Alan D. Romberg With the nomination of Frank Hsieh Chang-ting as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate to oppose Kuomintang (KMT) candidate Ma Ying-jeou in Taiwan’s March 2008 presidential election, and with the PRC gearing up greater pressure on Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, this is an appropriate moment to think about how the election will affect cross-Strait relations. The policies adopted by the next Taipei administration will, of course, be decisive in determining the course of those relations over the next four or even eight years. However, the campaign itself will shape both the way the next administration approaches cross-Strait issues and the mindset of Mainland policymakers as they prepare to deal with the new Taiwan leadership. It will also condition U.S. attitudes toward the winner. Taiwan—Where the Candidates Stand on Cross-Strait Relations One of the striking things that emerges from conversations with senior leaders in the KMT and DPP is their common assertion that, for all of the barbed rhetoric and legislative battles that divide them, and for all of the attempts by the current Taipei administration to paint the KMT as a PRC collaborator, the mainstreams of their parties are not terribly far apart in crucial respects on cross-Strait issues. Both candidates advocate broader cross-Strait economic and cultural ties. Both seek to expand Taiwan’s “international space” in a capacity that does not subordinate it to the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Notes of a Desolate Man As an Act of Mourning Abstract
    96 • Wittenberg University East Asian Studies Journal Notes of a Desolate Man as an Act of Mourning Joy Zhu Joy is a graduate from Middlebury College, class of 2017. She majored in comparative literature with a minor in German. Originally from Hong Kong, she now works as a research assistant as the Strelka Institute in Moscow. Abstract Chu T’ien-wen’s ( ) Notes of a Desolate Man is a montage of vastly different cultural references, where the authenticity of the floating, west-originated signifier repeatedly comes into question in its oriental context of Taiwan. The novel repeatedly includes names such as Eliot, Goethe, Montaigne, Foucault, Fellini, Levi-Strauss, Satyajit Ray, Ozu Yasujiro, the Bible, and references to Mao’s poetry. In my essay, I aim to answer the question: amidst the litter of references and quotes, where do we locate the author in the text, who seems to have created an inscrutable work of pastiche, and in which the different elements don’t seem to unify? Many scholars interpret the book in a Barthesian framework—the kaleidoscopic cultural references as the promiscuous expression of the main character’s homosexuality. Some of Chu’s textual practice is political, aiming to “negotiate Taiwan’s cultural identity through the aesthetics of hybridity,” giving the postcolonial Taiwan its vitality with the erotic potential of the clashing signifiers. However, I disagree with this reading, for Chu T’ien-wen’s conservative politics does not coincide with the vision of a utopia of hybridity. For her, the identity of Taiwan is not fluid but broken. Rather than advocating a concrete political vision or practice, this paper argues that Notes is about nostalgia and mourning Taiwan’s nationalistic past, as she emphasizes the importance of Walter Benjamin’s “Angel of History” in the epilogue of the Chinese version.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ma Administration at Half-Time
    Track Two Dialogue on EU-China-Relations and the Taiwan Question Shanghai, 5-6 June 2010 A workshop jointly organised by German Institute for International and Security Affairs / Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin and Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIS), Shanghai, with the friendly support of the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart. Discussion Paper Do not cite or quote without author’s permission Struggling to Regain Popular Support: The Ma Administration at Half-Time Dr. Hermann Halbeisen Research Institute for Political Science and European Affairs SWP Ludwigkirchplatz 3–4 10719 Berlin Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org 1 Introduction Two years ago, in 2008, the Blue Camp reaped landslide victories in both the legislative and presidential elections. Since then, President Ma Ying-jeou and his administration have experienced a massive loss of support among Taiwan's population, inducing foreign observers to speculate about the causes for 'Ma's puzzling midterm malaise' and about his chances for re-election in 20121. The Kuomintang (KMT) also suffered setbacks, performing poorly in a number of elections and by-elections. Both president and party are thus confronted with a range of challenges that will test their political acumen in the remaining years running up to the presidential elections in 2012. This paper will look at the following aspects of the present administration on Taiwan: • the administration's domestic performance vis-a-vis popular expectations • Ma's chairmanship of the KMT • the administration's – and the KMT's – performance in the elections • ECFA and related matters in the domestic debate, and • the prospects for the elections in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan's 2014 Nine-In-One Election
    TAIWAN’S 2014 NINE-IN-ONE ELECTION: GAUGING POLITICS, THE PARTIES, AND FUTURE LEADERS By John F. Copper* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 2 II. PAN-GREEN’S HANDICAPS ...................... 6 III. PAN-BLUE’S TRAVAILS ........................... 17 IV. PRE-ELECTION POLITICS ........................ 28 A. State of the Economy ............................ 28 B. Sunflower Student Movement ................... 31 C. Gas Explosion in Kaohsiung and Bad Cooking Oil Incidents ..................................... 36 V. THE CANDIDATES AND THE CAMPAIGN ..... 39 A. Taipei Mayor Race: Sean Lien v. KO Wen-je .... 44 B. Taichung Mayor Race: Jason Hu v. LIN Chia- Lung . ............................................ 48 C. Predictions of Other Elections ................... 50 D. How Different Factors May Have Influenced Voting ........................................... 50 VI. THE ELECTION RESULTS ........................ 51 A. Taipei City Mayoral Election Results ............ 53 B. Taichung Mayoral Election Results .............. 55 C. New Taipei Mayoral, Taoyuan Mayoral and Other Election Results ................................. 56 D. Main Reasons Cited Locally for the DPP Win and KMT Defeat ................................ 59 E. Reaction and Interpretation of the Election by the Media and Officialdom in Other Countries . 61 VII. CONCLUSIONS ......... ........................... 64 A. Consequences of This Election in Terms of Its Impact on Taiwan’s Future ...................... 70 * John F. Copper is the Stanley J. Buckman Professor of International Studies (emeritus) at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee. He is the author of a number of books on Taiwan, including Taiwan’s Democracy on Trial in 2010, Taiwan: Nation-State or Province? Sixth edition in 2013 and The KMT Returns to Power: Elections in Taiwan 2008 to 2012 (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2013). He has written on Taiwan’s elections since 1980. (1) 2 CONTEMPORARY ASIAN STUDIES SERIES B.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on the Graphical Design of Chinese Surnames Based on English Letters
    International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology ISSN 2706-6827 Vol. 3, Issue 1: 162-166, DOI: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.030121 Research on the Graphical Design of Chinese Surnames Based on English Letters Wei Sun* and Xinyan Chen Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, China *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This project takes the graphic(logo) design combining English letters and Chinese surnames as the research theme. In the modern social level, people use personalized logo symbols to establish personal and corporate images and deliver effective information. This design project takes surnames as the theme, breaks through the traditional Chinese characters as content graphics, uses the first letters of the surnames in English for logo design and combines the background of Chinese character culture to show a personalized graphic design Computer software is used in designing. KEYWORDS: English Letters, Chinese Surnames, Graphic(Logo) Design 1. Introduction 1.1 Graphic Design of Chinese Surnames There are many Chinese surnames with a long history. The surnames in the history of the Chinese nation have always been said by hundreds of surnames. Chang Yun: "Zhao Qian Sun Li, Wu Zheng Wang, Feng Chen Chu Wei, Jiang Shen Han Yang", there are 5,662 Chinese surnames found in the literature, of which single surname 3484, 2032 double surnames and 146 three-character surnames. The Chinese character logo designed with Chinese surnames can reflect the unique beauty of Chinese culture; the rich and colorful Chinese surname culture gives each Chinese character a special meaning. Therefore, the design of a logo with Chinese characters as graphics conveys the implicitness and compatibility of Chinese culture.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Taiwan Elections: Planning for the Future
    After the Taiwan Elections: Planning for the Future Alan D. Romberg President Ma Ying-jeou’s solid re-election victory on January 14 and the Kuomintang’s respectable showing in the Legislative Yuan (LY) contests not only eased anxiety in Beijing and Washington, but laid a foundation for yet further progress along all sides of the triangular relationship. On the other hand, they created challenges for Ma, the opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Beijing, and the United States. The substantially reduced margin of Ma’s victory as compared with 2008, and the smaller Kuomintang (KMT) majority in the LY, reflected not only the “recovery” of the DPP from the low point of the Chen Shui- bian years, but widespread ambivalence about the Ma administration’s policies and performance. Although the two major parties returned to their traditional levels of support, there were abundant warning signs for President Ma and his colleagues that they needed to pay far more attention to the issues of economic and social inequity raised by the DPP during the election or else their “legacy” would be tarnished and the chances of a DPP return to power in 2016 would be enhanced. Early indications are that Ma is taking the warning to heart. The DPP, meanwhile, is engaging in considerable reflection on why it fared so badly, far worse in the northern and central sections of Taiwan than it aimed for or had expected to achieve based on its internal polls. Particular attention was focused on the question of the party’s cross-Strait policy, and as this essay was being drafted, despite adoption of a report that finessed the question of what the party’s policy toward the Mainland should be, a sharp debate had already taken place and was likely to continue between those advocating “moving to the center” and those who insisted on maintaining traditional positions on Taiwan’s independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Connections a Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations
    Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations China-Taiwan Relations: Post-Election Continuity David G. Brown Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies In January, President Ma Ying-jeou won re-election and the KMT retained its majority in the legislature. Voters endorsed Ma’s gradual approach to developing constructive relations with the Mainland. In Beijing, the outcome validated President Hu Jintao’s “peaceful development” policies. Both sides have indicated that there will be continuity in cross-strait relations with a focus on a busy economic agenda. While understanding the domestic factors constraining Ma’s willingness to discuss political issues, Beijing has emphasized the importance of building political trust and strengthening a common Chinese heritage. Meanwhile, the DPP’s defeat has provoked an internal debate on the party’s policy toward Beijing but no clear picture has emerged on whether or how party policy might eventually change. Ma is re-elected In the Jan. 14 presidential election, Ma Ying-jeou won re-election with 51.6 percent of the vote. While the margin was larger than had been predicted, Ma’s 6 percent margin of victory was much below his 17 percent margin in 2008. In the Legislative Yuan (LY) elections, the Kuomintang (KMT) retained its absolute majority, but with a reduced majority and a much more complicated multi-party lineup. In the absence of exit polls, observers generally concluded that voters had opted to support Ma’s predictable economic and cross-strait policies over the uncertainty associated with Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Tsai Ing-wen and her poorly articulated cross-strait policies.
    [Show full text]