Accounting for Capital Assets
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
WHY ACCOUNTING and FINANCIAL REPORTING for GOVERNMENTS IS DIFFERENT THAN BUSINESSES by Jeffrey Winter
WHY ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR GOVERNMENTS IS DIFFERENT THAN BUSINESSES by Jeffrey Winter here are more than 80,000 user groups differ so too does the revenues through taxes on sales, governmental entities purpose of financial reporting. income, property and other activities. in the United States Governments are created to These types of revenues consisting of counties, provide their citizens with public are referred to as “nonexchange” municipalities,T townships, independent services that businesses are not transactions because they do not school districts and special districts. incentivized to provide. This includes result from a voluntary exchange Each government must adhere a wide variety of services from law between willing participants. In fact, to accounting and financial reporting enforcement to recreational activities the parties who provide the funding standards set by the Governmental to road repair. under nonexchange transactions are Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The users of these services are often not the same parties receiving These standards and the resulting interested in the government’s ability to the services funded – or at least they do financial statements are similar to those sustain the services and their ability to not benefit in direct correlation to the of businesses, but maintain a number do so efficiently. Further, they want to amount of funding provided. of key differences that often prompt know if the burden of paying for current As a result, the nature of individuals with business backgrounds services has already been funded or nonexchange transactions requires to ask the question: Why are the shifted to taxpayers in future years. different accounting considerations standards different for governments? Accordingly, governmental than exchange based revenues. -
Fund Accounting Training: Glossary
GLOSSARY Advance A type of internal borrowing (temporary or long term) between fund groups for which a due to/from must be set up. Agency funds Resources held by the institution as custodian or agent for students, faculty or staff, and organizations. No institutional equity in these funds. AICPA American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Annuity funds Funds established through a deferred giving contract. Payments to beneficiaries include both interest and a portion of principal. Upon the beneficiaries’ death, the funds revert to the agency. Auxiliary enterprise An entity that exists to furnish a service to students, faculty, or staff and charges a fee directly related to although not necessarily equal to the cost of the service; managed as essentially self‐supporting. Balance Sheet Financial statement reflecting self‐balancing classification of each fund group, including assets, liabilities, and fund balances. Board of Regents A group of persons, appointed by the Governor, whose powers are described in the charter or some legislative act that establishes the legal identity of the institution. Also, the governing board. Bond covenant Agreement between bondholders and the issuer, representing the board action that issued the bonds and setting forth related terms and conditions. Book value method Distribution of income among funds in an investment pool by book value of the funds. Capital asset Asset intended for long‐term, continued use or possession, such as land, buildings, and equipment. Synonymous with fixed asset or capital addition. Capital expenditure Expenditure intended to benefit future periods; addition to a capital asset. Capitalization policy Statement of criteria to determine which assets will be expended or recorded as capital assets. -
David Bean David R
Speaker Biographies David Bean David R. Bean is the director of research and technical activities for the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. He assigns and provides oversight to the GASB’s research, technical, and administrative activities. Prior to joining the GASB in 1990, David worked in public accounting and government. He also has served as Deputy Chairman of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). He was the lead author on the 1988 Governmental Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting and was the founder of the GAAFR Review. He was the last director of the National Council on Governmental Accounting before the formation of the GASB in 1984. David is a member of the Government Finance Officers Association, the Connecticut and Illinois Government Finance Officers Associations, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Illinois CPA Society, the Association of Government Accountants, the National Federation of Municipal Analysts, and the Municipal Analysts Group of New York. Lisa Parker Lisa Parker is a senior project manager with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). Prior to joining the GASB in 2008, Lisa worked for Runyon Kersteen Ouellette CPAs for 10 years, the town of Old Orchard Beach, Maine as finance director and interim town manager for 2 years, and the city of Saco, Maine as finance director for 8 years. Lisa is a certified public accountant and a chartered global management accountant. She also is a member of the Association of Governmental Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Maine Society of Certified Public Accountants, where she served as president. -
Governmental Accounting
SECTION I--GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING MEASUREMENT FOCUS BASIS OF ACCOUNTING (MFBA) Traditionally, governments have used essentially the same accounting as private-sector businesses for their proprietary funds (enterprise and internal service funds) and similar trust funds (nonexpendable and pension trust funds). In both cases, the measurement focus of the operating statement has been on the changes in economic resources (changes in total net position). Such changes have been recognized as soon as the underlying event or transaction has occurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flow – the accrual basis of accounting. Thus, under GASB 34, proprietary funds (enterprise and internal service funds) and fiduciary funds recognize revenues as soon as they are earned and expenses as soon as a liability is incurred, just like private-sector businesses. Governments have always taken a very different approach, however, in accounting for their governmental funds and expendable trust funds. The measurement focus here has been on changes in current financial resources. Additionally, changes in current financial resources have only been recognized to the extent that they normally are expected to have an impact upon near-term cash flows (modified accrual basis of accounting). Therefore, in addition to being earned, the inflows of expendable financial resources must also be available to pay for current period liabilities before it can be recognized as revenue. Likewise, in several cases (interest payable, compensated absences) no expenditure is recognized in a governmental fund for future outflows of financial resources that does not represent a use of current financial resources. This unique MFBA for governmental funds is reminiscent of fund accounting’s historical link with checkbook accounting (funds originally developed out of separate checking accounts) and is consistent with the near-term financing focus that typically characterizes a government’s operating budget. -
Governmental Accounting
SECTION I--GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING Fund Accounting Statute indicates resources which a school is permitted to receive and expressly and/or implicitly states the purposes for which those resources may be used. The accounting system used by a school should provide for legal compliance; that is, resources are received and spent according to law. For this reason, schools have evolved a means of indicating legal compliance by use of “fund accounting.” The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has defined the term “fund” as follows: A fund is a fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts recording cash and other financial resources, together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. The diverse nature of a school’s operations and the necessity of determining legal compliance preclude a single set of accounts for recording and summarizing all the financial transactions. Instead, the required accounts are organized on the basis of funds, each of which is completely independent of any other. Each fund must be so accounted for that the identity of its resources, obligations, revenues, expenditures, and fund equities is continually maintained. These purposes are accomplished by providing a complete self-balancing set of accounts for each fund which shows its assets, liabilities, fund balances or net position, revenues and expenditures/expenses. An account is defined as a formal record of a particular type of transaction. A group of accounts comprises a ledger. -
The Infrastructure Finance Challenge
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Walter, Ingo (Ed.) Book — Published Version The Infrastructure Finance Challenge Open Reports Series, No. 3 Provided in Cooperation with: Open Book Publishers Suggested Citation: Walter, Ingo (Ed.) (2016) : The Infrastructure Finance Challenge, Open Reports Series, No. 3, ISBN 978-1-78374-297-4, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0106 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/182375 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. -
Governmental Accounting
SECTION I--GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING MEASUREMENT FOCUS BASIS OF ACCOUNTING (MFBA) Traditionally, governments have used essentially the same accounting as private-sector businesses for their proprietary funds (enterprise and internal service funds) and similar trust funds (nonexpendable and pension trust funds). In both cases, the measurement focus of the operating statement has been on the changes in economic resources (changes in total net position). Such changes have been recognized as soon as the underlying event or transaction has occurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flow – the accrual basis of accounting. Thus, under GASB 34, proprietary funds (enterprise and internal service funds) and fiduciary funds recognize revenues as soon as they are earned and expenses as soon as a liability is incurred, just like private-sector businesses. Governments have always taken a very different approach, however, in accounting for their governmental funds and expendable trust funds. The measurement focus here has been on changes in current financial resources. Additionally, changes in current financial resources have only been recognized to the extent that they normally are expected to have an impact upon near-term cash flows (modified accrual basis of accounting). Therefore, in addition to being earned, the inflows of expendable financial resources must also be available to pay for current period liabilities before it can be recognized as revenue. Likewise, in several cases (interest payable, compensated absences) no expenditure is recognized in a governmental fund for future outflows of financial resources that does not represent a use of current financial resources. This unique MFBA for governmental funds is reminiscent of fund accounting’s historical link with checkbook accounting (funds originally developed out of separate checking accounts) and is consistent with the near-term financing focus that typically characterizes a government’s operating budget. -
A Glossary of Fiscal Terms & Acronyms
AUGUST7,1998VOLUME13,NO .VII A Publication of the House Fiscal Analysis Department on Government Finance Issues A GLOSSARY OF FISCAL TERMS & ACRONYMS 1998 Revised Edition Abstract. This issue of Money Matters is a resource document containing terms and acronyms commonly used by and in legislative fiscal committees and in the discussion of state budget and tax issues. The first section contains terms and abbreviations used in all fiscal committees and divisions. The remaining sections contain terms for particular budget categories and accounts, organized according to fiscal subject areas. This edition has new sections containing economic development, family and early childhood, and housing terms and acronyms. The other sections are revised and updated to reflect changes in terminology, particularly the human services section. For further information, contact the Chief Fiscal Analyst or the fiscal analyst assigned to the respective House fiscal committee or division. A directory of House Fiscal Analysis Department personnel and their committee/division assignments for the 1998 legislative session appears on the next page. Originally issued January 1997 Revised August 1998 House Fiscal Analysis Department Staff Assignments — 1998 Session Committee/Division Fiscal Analyst Telephone Room Chief Fiscal Analyst Bill Marx 296-7176 373 Capital Investment John Walz 296-8236 376 EDIT— Economic Development Finance CJ Eisenbarth Hager 296-5813 428 EDIT— Housing Finance Cynthia Coronado 296-5384 361 Environment & Natural Resources Finance Jim Reinholdz 296-4119 370 Education — Higher Education Finance Doug Berg 296-5346 372 K-12 Education Finance Greg Crowe 296-7165 378 Family & Early Childhood Finance Cynthia Coronado 296-5384 361 Health & Human Services Finance Joe Flores 296-5483 385 Judiciary Finance Gary Karger 296-4181 383 State Government Finance Helen Roberts 296-4117 374 Transportation Finance John Walz 296-8236 376 Taxes — Income, sales, misc. -
Accountant 07.100 Class Specification
STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION TITLE GRADE EEO-4 CODE ACCOUNTANT II (CAFR) 43 B 7.100 ACCOUNTANT I (CAFR) 40 B 7.101 SERIES CONCEPT Accountants in this series perform the highest level of financial reporting. Incumbents work in the State Controller’s Office and produce the State’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which is audited by an independent public accounting firm and submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and is essential for obtaining bond ratings and required for the Single Audit Report; implement Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) pronouncements; assist agencies with accounting issues and document processing; approve agency documents and work programs; provide training to agencies on automated financial system; and calculate arbitrage and prepare arbitrage tax returns. Prepare the State’s CAFR comprising government-wide financial statements and individual financial statements for approximately 100 funds, budgetary statements, introductory section, management’s discussion and analysis, notes to the financial statements, required supplementary information, and the statistical section; analyze and report calculation and allocation of pooled cash and investments, unrealized gains/losses, securities lending, accrued interest, and compensated absences for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and GASB reporting requirements. Provide guidance and expertise on GAAP and GASB reporting requirements, use of the State’s automated financial system, use of the chart of accounts, application of accounting policies and procedures, set-up and maintenance of budget accounts and general ledgers. Provide final approval of journal vouchers and work programs generated by agencies and provide formal accounting training classes; interpret and enforce the State’s Accounting Policies and Procedures. -
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) of William Sharpe (1964)
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 18, Number 3—Summer 2004—Pages 25–46 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French he capital asset pricing model (CAPM) of William Sharpe (1964) and John Lintner (1965) marks the birth of asset pricing theory (resulting in a T Nobel Prize for Sharpe in 1990). Four decades later, the CAPM is still widely used in applications, such as estimating the cost of capital for firms and evaluating the performance of managed portfolios. It is the centerpiece of MBA investment courses. Indeed, it is often the only asset pricing model taught in these courses.1 The attraction of the CAPM is that it offers powerful and intuitively pleasing predictions about how to measure risk and the relation between expected return and risk. Unfortunately, the empirical record of the model is poor—poor enough to invalidate the way it is used in applications. The CAPM’s empirical problems may reflect theoretical failings, the result of many simplifying assumptions. But they may also be caused by difficulties in implementing valid tests of the model. For example, the CAPM says that the risk of a stock should be measured relative to a compre- hensive “market portfolio” that in principle can include not just traded financial assets, but also consumer durables, real estate and human capital. Even if we take a narrow view of the model and limit its purview to traded financial assets, is it 1 Although every asset pricing model is a capital asset pricing model, the finance profession reserves the acronym CAPM for the specific model of Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Black (1972) discussed here. -
Fund & Revenue Accounting
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER DEPARTMENTAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GUIDE FUNDANDREVENUE ACCOUNTING TABLE OF CONTENTS - CHAPTER 4 I. CHAPTER 4 – FUND AND REVENUE ACCOUNTING ............................................ 1 II. PERTINENT GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS .................................................. 1 A. GAAP .............................................................................................................. 1 B. Higher Education Financial Reporting GAAP ........................................................... 3 III. DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONAL STRUCTURE ......................................................... 4 IV. UNRESTRICTED VS. RESTRICTED ..................................................................... 5 V. FUND AND FUND GROUPS ................................................................................ 7 A. Fund ............................................................................................................... 7 B. Fund Group ...................................................................................................... 8 VI. AGENCY FUNDS (Fund 80) ............................................................................... 9 VII. PLANT FUNDS (Funds 71, 72, 73, 74, 78) ......................................................11 A. Capital Construction Plant Fund (Fund 71) .......................................................... 11 B. Renewal and Replacement Plant Fund (Funds 72, 78) ........................................... 12 C. Retirement of Indebtedness Plant Fund (Fund 73) .............................................. -
A Cliff Effect: the New Landscape for Taxable Asset Transactions
A cliff effect: The new landscape for taxable asset transactions New tax act shifts economics of certain transaction structures The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act)1 signed into law last Taxable sale of stock vs. taxable sale of assets December immediately ushered in a wave of unknowns. It’s In general, an acquisition of a trade or business can take only clear, however, that there is a new landscape for negotiating two possible forms, a purchase of equity or a purchase of and structuring taxable acquisitions. Most significantly, the assets. Although certain provisions in the tax law provide for Act reduced the corporate tax rate to 21% for taxable years gain deferral either in whole or in part, a basic tenet of U.S. beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, down from the highest pre-Act federal income tax law provides that gain or loss is recognized rate of 35%. when property is exchanged in a transaction. In such instances, buyers and sellers engaged in taxable transactions face the Although the Act is arguably a boon to corporations overall, fundamental decision of whether to structure the transaction it presents new, nuanced issues when structuring taxable as the sale of equity or the sale of assets. This age-old tension asset acquisitions. Other modifications to the code,2 when between buyers and sellers is an important negotiating point in coupled with the rate changes, may cause ripple effects that many transactions. Sellers are primarily concerned with reducing fundamentally shift the economics of certain transaction their taxes upon sale, while buyers seek higher deductible, structures.