Note for the Attention of the STOA Panel 

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Note for the Attention of the STOA Panel  Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union Directorate E Legislative Coordination and Conciliation Unit for Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) The Head of Unit Brussels, 18 October 2010 Note for the attention of the STOA Panel Subject: STOA delegation to the 7th meeting of the STS forum, 3 – 5 October 2010, Kyoto, Japan SUMMARY A STOA delegation attended the 7th meeting of the STS forum (3-5 October 2010, Kyoto). As the only high-level European policy-makers attending the forum, the three Members, led by the STOA Chairman, participated in meetings with leading Japanese policy-makers, where they presented the European Parliament's position and exchanged views about important and sensitive issues concerning EU-Japan cooperation in the area of Science and Technology (S&T), notably the future financing and management of the ITER Project1 and the ratification of the EU-Japan S&T Cooperation Agreement. Mr Rübig spoke in the Plenary Session entitled ‘Investing in Science and Technology for Building the Future Dialogue among Political Leaders, Scientists and Industrialists’; Mr Correia de Campos spoke in the Concurrent Session entitled ‘The Science of Ageing’; Ms Riera Madurell spoke in the Concurrent Session entitled ‘Security in the Age of ICT’. The delegation further participated in a roundtable discussion focusing on Technology Assessment (TA) structures in the European Parliament (EP) and the European Commission (EC), at a time when the Japanese government is exploring the possibility to establish an official TA institution in Japan. The interaction with the Japanese policy-makers was appreciated by both sides, resulting in a sense of mutual trust and respect, which led the two sides to confirm their interest and commitment in pursuing these contacts in the context of or in parallel with future meetings of the STS forum. The delegation also participated in meetings with policy-makers from other countries and visited advanced research facilities (Naka Fusion Research Institute, RIKEN Kobe Institute). 1. Introduction A delegation of STOA Panel members led by Mr Paul RÜBIG, STOA Chairman, attended the 7th meeting of the Science and Technology in Society (STS) forum held from 3 to 5 October 2010 in 1 ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) is a cooperative research project using international resources and expertise towards the practical realisation of fusion energy. The ITER Agreement was signed by the EU, China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the USA in November 2006. The main ITER facility will be constructed in Cadarache, France. The EU will carry 45.5 % of the construction costs. Construction should take 10 years, to be followed by 20 years of operation and 5 years planned for deactivation. The ITER Organisation (IO) is responsible for the joint implementation of the ITER Project. Each ITER party's Domestic Agency is responsible for the party's contribution to IO. B-1047 Bruxelles - Tel +32 2 28 43812 - Fax 0032 2 28 44984 F-67070 Strasbourg - Tel +33 3 88 1 72579 - Fax 0033 3 88 1 79054 Kyoto. The other delegation members were Mr António F. CORREIA DE CAMPOS, STOA Vice- Chairman, and Ms Teresa RIERA MADURELL, Panel member. A STOA delegation of up to three Members had been authorised by the EP Bureau on 5 May 2010. The STS forum, inaugurated in November 2004, holds an annual meeting, starting on the first Sunday of October every year, in Kyoto. The meeting is aimed at providing a framework for open discussions regarding the further progress of science and technology for the benefit of humankind, while keeping track of ethical, safety and environmental issues resulting from their application. The forum has been founded and chaired since the beginning by Mr Koji Omi, former Japanese Minister of Science and Technology (2001 - 2002) and Minister of Finance (2006 - 2007). Over the years, it has grown in stature and has attracted important participants, including many from third-world countries. Prior to its departure, the delegation had been briefed, in two separate meetings, by the Japanese Ambassador to the EU, Mr Nobutake ODANO, on current developments in Japanese S&T policy. Mr Octavio QUINTANA TRIAS, Director responsible for Nuclear Energy (Euratom) in the EC's DG Research, had briefed the delegation on recent developments concerning ITER. A visit to the Fusion Research Institute in Naka (North East of Tokyo) on 1 October 2010 and high- level bilateral meetings on 2 October 2010 in Kyoto were added to the programme in the course of the preparation - an extension of the delegation authorisation, to cover these dates, was requested from the EP President. The rest of the delegation's activities were centred on the meeting of the STS forum, which took place in the Kyoto International Conference Center (ICC Kyoto). The delegation was accompanied by Mr Theodoros KARAPIPERIS, head of the STOA Secretariat. Three officials of the EU Delegation in Tokyo (Ms Barbara RHODE, head of S&T at the delegation, Mr Akira KIMURA and Ms Mari TOMODA, interpreter) accompanied the STOA delegation throughout their visit to Japan and helped in the organisation of many activities and meetings. STOA information material (general information, sample of recent studies, STOA CD) was available at the main conference information desk and were very much in demand by conference participants. 2. Background The visit to the Naka Institute and the subsequent discussions of the delegation with leading Japanese policy-makers were carried out under the particular situation that developed among the ITER partners following the recent substantial re-evaluation of the cost of the project during the construction phase. Being by far the biggest contributor, the EU is confronted with the need to agree on a way of financing a substantial gap in commitment appropriations for the years 2012-2013. Concerns by the Japanese side about the further financing of the project by the EU and the recent changes in the top management structure of ITER have contributed to a certain erosion of trust among the partners. The Japanese side is further concerned about the delay in the ratification of the EU-Japan S&T Cooperation Agreement, signed on 30 November 2009, and currently being considered by the EP. [The delay is, in fact, due to the deliberations between EP and Council concerning the role of the EP in the conclusion of international agreements under the Lisbon Treaty (Art. 218) and does not reflect any reservations on the European side. The EP is expected to give its consent before the end of 2010.] In this context, the Japanese policy-makers were keen to underline their commitment to fulfilling their obligations under the ITER Agreement, as well as under the so-called ‘Broader Approach’2. The STOA delegation visited Japan at a time when the Japanese government is deliberating on the next (4th) period of the S&T Basic Plan (analogous to the EU Research Framework Programme), which is due to begin in April 2011. Moreover, the roundtable discussion held on Sunday, 3 October, at the University of Kyoto to discuss TA structures within the EP (TA projects account for the biggest part of STOA's activities and budget) and the EC, took place at a time when the Japanese government is exploring the possibility to establish an official TA institution in Japan. 2 The ‘Broader Approach’ is a joint EU-Japan project, which will carry out supportive research for ITER and R&D for a DEMO reactor (the next step towards the realisation of fusion energy, which should serve as a prototype for commercial reactors) during the ITER construction phase. 2 3. Friday, 1 October 2010 Ms Riera Madurell, accompanied by Mr Karapiperis and her assistant, Ms Iris ONTAVILLA MATSCHILLES, visited the Naka Fusion Research Institute on 1 October. The visit was preceded by a working lunch with high-level JAEA3 representatives, including Dr Sohei OKADA, JAEA Executive Director, Dr Hiromasa NINOMIYA, Director-General of the Naka Institute, and Kazuichiro HASHIMOTO, Director responsible for International Affairs in JAEA. JAEA acts as the Japanese Domestic Agency (DA) of the ITER Project and runs the Naka site. Also present was Mr Kaname IKEDA, ITER Director-General from December 2005 until his replacement in July 2010. Highlights of the visit included tours of the Superconducting Coil Test Facility and the Large Tokamak Device JT-60, which will be upgraded to a superconducting tokamak, known as JT-60SA, in the context of the ‘Broader Approach’. Ms Riera Madurell expressed her appreciation of the high quality of the research described by her interlocutors and reassured them about the European commitment to the continuation of the ITER and ‘Broader Approach’ activities. 4. Saturday, 2 October 2010 Ms Riera Madurell, her assistant and the accompanying EP and EC officials, travelled to Kyoto the following day (2 October), where they were joined by the STOA Chairman for a working lunch. A meeting of the delegation with Ms Naledi Grace MANDISSA, South African Minister of S&T, originally scheduled for that afternoon was cancelled due to a conflicting meeting that the Minister was finally obliged to attend at the same time. 4.1. Meeting with Prof. John Beddington, Chief Scientist, UK Government The delegation met, later that evening (18:00-19:00), with Prof. BEDDINGTON, Chief Scientific Adviser, Government Office for Science, UK, and members of his staff. The discussion focused on: 1) The need to maintain the current levels of research funding, in the face of pressures to reduce it;
Recommended publications
  • List of Participants As of 17 January 2014
    Japan Meeting List of Participants As of 17 January 2014 Tokyo, Japan, 11 June 2013 Shinzo Abe Prime Minister of Japan Evgeny V. Afanasiev Ambassador of the Russian Federation Embassy of the Russian Japan to Japan Federation in Japan Nicolas Aguzin Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Hong Kong SAR Asia-Pacific Hirotsugu Aida Columnist Kyodo News Japan Koichi Akaishi Japan Economic Revitalization Bureau Cabinet Office of Japan Japan Manager, Assistant Director Akira Amari Minister for Economic Revitalization and Minister for Economic and Fiscal Policy of Japan Jun Arai Representative Director and Chief Showa Shell Sekiyu KK Japan Operating Officer Hiroto Arakawa Vice-President, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Japan Hiroto Arakawa Vice-President, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Japan Keiichiro Asao Member of the House of Representatives, Japan William Barriga Chief of Mission International Organization for Japan Migration (IOM) Neelanjan Head, Japan Business HCL Technologies Ltd Japan Bhattacharjee Børge Brende Managing Director and Member of the World Economic Forum Switzerland Managing Board Børge Brende Managing Director and Member of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway Managing Board Norway Urs Bucher Ambassador of Switzerland Embassy of Switzerland Japan Johan Cels Representative United Nations High Japan Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Adrian David Cheok Professor and Inventor, Graduate Keio University Japan School of Media Design Mitsuru Claire Chino Executive Officer, General Manager of Itochu Corporation Japan Lega l Division I-han Chou Senior Editor, Nature Nature Publishing Group Japan Sayuri Daimon Managing Editor The Japan Times Ltd Japan Katsuya Debari President and Chief Executive Officer Odyssey Communications Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Roster of Winners in Single-Seat Constituencies No
    Tuesday, October 24, 2017 | The Japan Times | 3 lower house ele ion ⑳ NAGANO ㉘ OSAKA 38KOCHI No. 1 Takashi Shinohara (I) No. 1 Hiroyuki Onishi (L) No. 1 Gen Nakatani (L) Roster of winners in single-seat constituencies No. 2 Mitsu Shimojo (KI) No. 2 Akira Sato (L) No. 2 Hajime Hirota (I) No. 3 Yosei Ide (KI) No. 3 Shigeki Sato (K) No. 4 Shigeyuki Goto (L) No. 4 Yasuhide Nakayama (L) 39EHIME No. 4 Masaaki Taira (L) ⑮ NIIGATA No. 5 Ichiro Miyashita (L) No. 5 Toru Kunishige (K) No. 1 Yasuhisa Shiozaki (L) ( L ) Liberal Democratic Party; ( KI ) Kibo no To; ( K ) Komeito; No. 5 Kenji Wakamiya (L) No. 6 Shinichi Isa (K) No. 1 Chinami Nishimura (CD) No. 2 Seiichiro Murakami (L) ( JC ) Japanese Communist Party; ( CD ) Constitutional Democratic Party; No. 6 Takayuki Ochiai (CD) No. 7 Naomi Tokashiki (L) No. 2 Eiichiro Washio (I) ㉑ GIFU No. 3 Yoichi Shiraishi (KI) ( NI ) Nippon Ishin no Kai; ( SD ) Social Democratic Party; ( I ) Independent No. 7 Akira Nagatsuma (CD) No. 8 Takashi Otsuka (L) No. 3 Takahiro Kuroiwa (I) No. 1 Seiko Noda (L) No. 4 Koichi Yamamoto (L) No. 8 Nobuteru Ishihara (L) No. 9 Kenji Harada (L) No. 4 Makiko Kikuta (I) No. 2 Yasufumi Tanahashi (L) No. 9 Isshu Sugawara (L) No. 10 Kiyomi Tsujimoto (CD) No. 4 Hiroshi Kajiyama (L) No. 3 Yoji Muto (L) 40FUKUOKA ① HOKKAIDO No. 10 Hayato Suzuki (L) No. 11 Hirofumi Hirano (I) No. 5 Akimasa Ishikawa (L) No. 4 Shunpei Kaneko (L) No. 1 Daiki Michishita (CD) No. 11 Hakubun Shimomura (L) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Legislator-Expert Delegation on the Future of Democracy
    日本国際交流センター JAPAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE JAPAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE 日本国際交流センター Joint Legislator-Expert Delegation on the Future of Democracy REPORT OCTOBER 2019 On September日 17–20,本国 2019,際交 a流 jointセン JCIEター delegation of Japanese legislators and policy experts visited Washington DCJAPAN to CENTERmeet FOR with INTERNATIONAL US Congressional EXCHANGE members, government officials, think tank experts, and NGO leaders to exchange views on the global state of democracy and on ways in which the two countries can further support democratization. The delegation members and their American counterparts expressed concern over the rise of authoritarianism and populism worldwide, as well as about the backsliding in countries that had been thought to be in a transition to democracy, sharing a sense of crisis about the future of democracy around the globe. In particular, US leaders repeatedly expressed their strong hope that Japan will play a more proactive role in supporting democratization and the rule of law in the Asia-Pacific region. US APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY Further, the growing global influence of non-democratic SUPPORT states such as China and Russia adds to the sense that authoritarianism is on the rise worldwide. Against this Democracy’s Global Retreat backdrop, there is a sense of crisis and a recognition that US legislators, government officials, and experts shared democracy must be defended and democratic backslid- a deep sense of concern over democratic backsliding and ing must stop. rising threats to democracy around the world. In many emerging democracies, progress has been reversed and US Institutions Involved in Democracy Promotion authoritarianism is resurgent as widening inequality Overseas and an increase in corruption and crime have fueled Since its founding, Americans have considered democ- disappointment in democratic transitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilience the Motif of Bamboo in the U.S
    2012 Japanese American Leadership Delegation 復元力 Resilience The motif of bamboo in the U.S. is a common design found on screens, paintings, textiles and ceramics. It is a beautiful plant that reminds us of East Asia and is known to grow widely throughout Japan. It is a functional, practical and edible material that the Japanese have used for centuries in building houses, shaping utensils and enjoying in their daily meals. Aside from art and form, the Japanese often turn to nature for life lessons and bamboo is known for symbolizing resilience. Not only does it grow quickly and proliferate in groves, but it can bend without breaking under the weight of wind and rain. In March of 2012, the twelfth Japanese American Leadership Delegation first convened in Tokyo before traveling to Sendai and Ishinomaki, areas which had been damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake just one year before. Anniversaries of natural disasters may bring out anxiety, as people remember the past and look around at a present that seems fragile with endless cleanup work to be done. We were no longer watching events unfold from thousands of miles away on a television screen. Instead, we were offered a glimpse of 3.11 up close. (continued on inside back cover) cover photograph by Shannon Hori © 2012 U.S.-Japan Council All Rights Reserved 2012 Report 復元力 Resilience 1 Table of Contents March 4, 2012 JEN Tour and Meetings . 3 March 5, 2012 Social Entrepreneurs in Sendai . 10 The Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership Symposium . 13 March 6, 2012 The 2012 Delegates with Her Imperial Highness Princess Takamado .
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008/04 -2009/03
    Health Policy Institute, Japan Annual Report FY2009 Our Mission To help citizens shape health policies by generating policy options, and to bring stakeholders together as a think-tank. Guiding Principles Independent Maintain independence. Be non-partisan. Multi-stakeholder Bring stakeholders together. Provide an open forum for debate. Agenda Shaping Identify critical issues for citizens. Promote active exchange of ideas. Global Cultivate a global perspective. Collaborate with world-class leaders in health policy. Pursuit of Excellence Pursue excellence in all that the Institute does. Lead in the policy arena. Contents 1. Greetings from the Chairman 5 2. Highlights of Our Activities in FY2009 7 3. Our Activities in FY 2009 I. Health Policy 8 II. Commission on Citizens and Health 11 III. Global Health 14 4. Our Plans for FY2010 16 5. Our Publications 16 6. Our History 17 7. “Revolving Door Realization” -Health Policy Institute, Japan’s Talent Production Cycle 18 8. Overview 20 9. Financial Results 21 o help citizens shape health policies by generating policy options, and to T bring stakeholders together as a think-tank. Independent Multi Stakeholder 1. Greetings from the Chairman Health Policy Institute, Japan was established in 2004 as an independent, non-profit, non-partisan private think tank aiming to realize citizen-centered health policy. Since inception, our activities have been conducted in the belief that realizing the health policies truly sought by the public demands the development of a mature and democratic process; one involving a wide range of stakeholders and open discussion of policy options based on objective data in order to arrive at responsible, meaningful decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • US-Japan Parliamentary Exchange Program 2019 Delegation to the United States
    US-Japan Parliamentary Exchange Program 2019 Delegation to the United States SEPTEMBER 2019 ON SEPTEMBER 17–20, JCIE’s 30th delegation of Diet While in the United States, the delegates met with members visited the United States. Representing both seven Congressional members and a diverse array of the ruling and opposition parties, the parliamentarians senior government officials and NGO leaders to ex- traveled together with a JCIE study team comprised of change views on US-Japan security and trade issues Japanese experts on democratic governance for a series and to discuss lessons learned by US institutions en- of high-level meetings and roundtables in Washington gaged with democracy assistance. Toward the end of DC. The group met with more than 50 American and the week, they were also featured as speakers at the Japanese leaders to exchange views on US-Japan re- fifth Tadashi Yamamoto Memorial Seminar, hosted lations, as well as to explore the potential for greater by the Council on Foreign Relations, where they dis- cooperation in support of democratization in Asia. The cussed the theme of the program, “Japan in the World: exchange was part of a project that JCIE began in 2018 Sustaining Democracy,” and talked more broadly about on “Expanding Support for Democratic Governance.” Japan’s domestic political situation. Diet members with Rep. David Price, Rep. Adrian Smith, and Rep. Bill Senator Cory Gardner discusses US-Japan relations and the future of Flores from the House Democratic Partnership Asia with the delegation 2 KEY POINTS OF DISCUSSION PARTICIPANTS Domestic Politics in the US and Japan Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal Toward Achieving Co-Creation of Policies Between Diet Members and Scientists
    EAJ Report 2020-01 General Incorporated Foundation: Watanabe Memorial Foundation for The Advancement of New Technology Science and Technology Research Grant for the first half of fiscal year 2019 “Research and Trial Studies on Sharing Intelligent Information between Legislative Bodies and Academia” Result Report Proposal Toward Achieving Co-Creation of Policies Between Diet Members and Scientists August 2020 THE ENGINEERING ACADEMY OF JAPAN Project for the research and trial studies on sharing intelligent information between legislative bodies and academia (Leader: Hiroshi Nagano) July 7, 2020 THE ENGINEERING ACADEMY OF JAPAN The Engineering Academy of Japan (EAJ) is a non-profit, non-governmental organization established for the purpose of contributing to the advancement of engineering and technological sciences in Japan. Its members are leading engineers in industry, academia, and government. EAJ has several project teams that tackle various issues fully utilizing its broad network and abundant experience and knowledge of its members. With these project teams playing the core roles, EAJ promotes investigation and proposal activities, also with the cooperation of external people and organizations. EAJ summarizes the outcome of its activities, and proposes leading and creative policies to the public agencies, legislative bodies, industry, academic societies, research institutions, etc. in terms of the direction the society shall head for, and provides support for the proposed policies to be socially implemented. In view of the current situation where legislative bodies and academia have no practical systematic relationship pertaining to important policy making even though Japan is facing complex social issues, the team for the “Project for the research and trial studies on sharing intelligent information between legislative bodies and academia” studied where the problems lie and which direction reforms shall take, and summarized what EAJ shall do.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Policy Summit 2019 Hosted by Health and Global Policy Institute (HGPI) 2019年2月23日(土) Saturday, February 23, 2019 医療政策サミット2019
    医療政策サミット2019 特定非営利活動法人 日本医療政策機構(HGPI) 主催 Health Policy Summit 2019 Hosted by Health and Global Policy Institute (HGPI) 2019年2月23日(土) Saturday, February 23, 2019 医療政策サミット2019 ■日時: 2019年2月23日(土)10:30-15:30 ■会場: 六本木アカデミーヒルズ タワーホール 10:30 開会 開会の辞 10:35-10:40 上野 宏史(厚生労働大臣政務官) 趣旨説明・HGPIの15年を振り返る 10:40-10:50 乗竹 亮治(日本医療政策機構 理事・事務局長) 10:50-11:50 セッション 1「次世代を担うキーパーソンと考える日本の医療」 11:50-13:00 ランチネットワーキング 13:00-14:00 セッション 2「リデザイニング人類社会 ~デジタル化する医療・国・個人の関係のなかで」 14:20-15:20 セッション 3「いま考える2040年の社会保障」 閉会の辞 15:20-15:30 黒川 清(日本医療政策機構 代表理事) *同時通訳あり・敬称略 Health Policy Summit 2019 ■ Date & Time: 10:30-15:30, Saturday, February 23, 2019 ■ Venue: Tower Hall, Roppongi Academy Hills 10:30 Opening Welcoming Remarks 10:35-10:40 Hiroshi Ueno (Parliamentary Vice-Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)) Explanatory Introduction / Reviewing HGPI’s 15 Years 10:40-10:50 Ryoji Noritake (CEO, HGPI) 10:50-11:50 Session 1: A Conversation on Healthcare in Japan with Key Leaders of the Next Generation 11:50-13:00 Lunch Networking Session 2: : Redesigning Society – Digitization of the Healthcare-Government-Individual 13:00-14:00 Dynamic 14:20-15:20 Session 3: Setting a Vision for Social Security Towards 2040 Closing Remarks 15:20-15:30 Kiyoshi Kurokawa (Chairman, HGPI) *Simultaneous translation will be available **Titles omitted 2 | Health Policy Summit 2019 セッション1「次世代を担うキーパーソンと考える日本の医療」 10:50-11:50 Session 1: A Conversation on Healthcare in Japan with Key Leaders of the Next Generation 多くの政策領域と同じくして、医療政策を含む社会保障政策では、国民への給付や富の再分配のみならず、国 民に負担の分配を求める状況が発生します。特に、超高齢社会を迎えた我が国においては、社会保障領域での 今後の国民負担は、多くの国民にとって関心事になっています。国立社会保障・人口問題研究所が2017年に公 表した推計によると、2025年には、75歳以上の後期高齢者の全人口に対する割合が17.8パーセントに達し、2040 年代には高齢化社会がピークに至り、人口の35パーセント以上が65歳以上の高齢者になると予測されています。 このような状況にあって、「日本のあるべき医療・社会保障」について国民にビジョンを示し、説得していく 政治的リーダーシップは不可欠です。立法府で今後も活躍が期待される次世代のキーパーソンが思い描くビ ジョンは何か。与野党のリーダーの知見を共有します。 As is common in many other fields of policy, social security policy including healthcare policy can cause the redistribution of public benefits and wealth and may increase the burden borne by the public.
    [Show full text]