DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Gas & Electric Company ELC (Corp ID 39) Status of Advice Letter 5847E Disposition: Effective Date: Accepted 07-11-20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pacific Gas & Electric Company ELC (Corp ID 39) Status of Advice Letter 5847E Disposition: Effective Date: Accepted 07-11-20 STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco CA 94102-3298 Pacific Gas & Electric Company ELC (Corp ID 39) Status of Advice Letter 5847E As of August 10, 2020 Subject: Grant of Easement to California Department of Water Resources for Relocation Work Related to the Oroville Spillway Incident Request for Approval under Public Utilities Code Section 851 and General Order 173 Division Assigned: Energy Date Filed: 06-11-2020 Date to Calendar: 06-17-2020 Authorizing Documents: None Disposition: Accepted Effective Date: 07-11-2020 Resolution Required: No Resolution Number: None Commission Meeting Date: None CPUC Contact Information: [email protected] AL Certificate Contact Information: Annie Ho 415-973-8794 [email protected] STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco CA 94102-3298 To: Energy Company Filing Advice Letter From: Energy Division PAL Coordinator Subject: Your Advice Letter Filing The Energy Division of the California Public Utilities Commission has processed your recent Advice Letter (AL) filing and is returning an AL status certificate for your records. The AL status certificate indicates: Advice Letter Number Name of Filer CPUC Corporate ID number of Filer Subject of Filing Date Filed Disposition of Filing (Accepted, Rejected, Withdrawn, etc.) Effective Date of Filing Other Miscellaneous Information (e.g., Resolution, if applicable, etc.) The Energy Division has made no changes to your copy of the Advice Letter Filing; please review your Advice Letter Filing with the information contained in the AL status certificate, and update your Advice Letter and tariff records accordingly. All inquiries to the California Public Utilities Commission on the status of your Advice Letter Filing will be answered by Energy Division staff based on the information contained in the Energy Division's PAL database from which the AL status certificate is generated. If you have any questions on this matter please contact the: Energy Division's Tariff Unit by e-mail to [email protected] Erik Jacobson Pacific Gas and Electric Company Director 77 Beale St., Mail Code B13U Regulatory Relations P.O. Box 770000 San Francisco, CA 94177 Fax: 415.973.3582 June 11, 2020 Advice 5847-E (Pacific Gas and Electric Company ID U 39 E) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Subject: Grant of Easement to California Department of Water Resources for Relocation Work Related to the Oroville Spillway Incident – Request for Approval under Public Utilities Code Section 851 and General Order 173 Purpose Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) requests approval under Public Utilities Code Section 851 (Section 851) and General Order 173, to grant the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) a perpetual non-exclusive easement agreement (Easement, included as Attachment 1) located on PG&E fee-owned property1 near Lake Oroville in unincorporated Butte County, California (Property). The Easement areas within the Property are located near Oroville Dam Boulevard to the North East of the City of Oroville. The proposed Easement would grant DWR permission to occupy the Property to construct, operate, and maintain three (3) 230 kilovolt (kV) power lines and four (4) underground electric and communication conduits on PG&E’s Property. This is necessary safety work as described in the Oroville Spillway Emergency Response and Recovery Resources Report (OER Resources Report)2 regarding the Oroville Spillway Incident in February 2017 (Incident). The OER Resources Report is included herein as Attachment 2. The purchase fee for the Easement is $80,300. The fair market value was determined by a formal appraisal performed by Bender Rosenthal Inc., dated February 9, 2018, included herein as Attachment 3. PG&E has inspected the Property and determined that the proposed Easement will not interfere with PG&E’s operations or PG&E’s ability to provide safe and reliable utility 1 PG&E’s property consists of two separate parcels; Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 069-010-019-000 (139.93 acres) and 033-010-055-000 (96.49 acres). 2 Oroville Spillway Emergency Response and Recovery Resources Report, California Department of Water Resources; dated January 24, 2018. Advice 5847-E - 2 - June 11, 2020 service to its customers. In addition, said Easement will not be adverse to the public interest. Background PG&E owns land, buildings, and other facilities in connection with the provision of electric and natural gas services to its customers throughout northern and central California. In the provision of these services, PG&E relies on a portfolio of fee properties, rights-of-way, and facilities to support its electric and gas activities. Some of these properties are adjacent to those owned by DWR. The Property, which is approximately 236.42 acres, is owned by PG&E for the purpose of housing portions of the Table Mountain-Palermo 230kV and Palermo-Oroville #2 60kV Electric Transmission facilities. DWR owns the Oroville Dam, located on the Feather River, approximately 75 miles north of Sacramento, California, and five miles northeast of the City of Oroville, and operates the dam facilities under a license from FERC (FERC Hydroelectric Project No. 2100). The DWR-owned real property on which the Oroville Dam is located is adjacent to the Property. In February of 2017, the Oroville Dam main spill way and emergency spillway suffered extensive erosion and damage. Due to high inflows into Lake Oroville and reduced outflow capacity on the main spillway, Lake Oroville overtopped the adjacent emergency spillway on February 11, 2017, which resulted in back-cutting erosion on the emergency spillway that threatened the stability of the emergency spillway’s crest structure. Subsequent increased operation of the main spillway led to the loss of the lower portion of the spillway chute and caused significant erosion near the spillway failure site. To ensure public safety following the Incident, DWR was required to complete emergency response and recovery activities before seasonal rainfall began in November 2017, as the rainfall could have required the use of the main or emergency spillways. As a result, this work was initiated in late February 2017, pursuant to DWR’s Oroville facilities Emergency Action Plan (EAP). As part of this effort, DWR immediately routed two (2) temporary electrical lines (shoofly) partially around the repair sites to transmit power generated from the Hyatt Pumping-Generating Plant. In May 2017, DWR submitted an initial filing to the FERC to notify them of the emergency response and recovery effort that was deployed in February 2017 per the EAP. The FERC filing is included herein as Attachment 4. After obtaining an amendment to its license from FERC on August 23, 2017, DWR proceeded to permanently reroute its Oroville-Table Mountain 230 kV overhead electrical facilities (Oroville-Table Mountain Facilities), away from the area of the project spillways and associated construction activities. This work, a portion of which took place on the Property, was completed in October 2018, including site stabilization and restoration. DWR has a standing requirement to ensure that the Advice 5847-E - 3 - June 11, 2020 facilities can reliably and permanently transmit electricity during the repair of the damaged sites, thereby necessitating the need to relocate the electrical facilities immediately.3 PG&E learned of the Oroville-Table Mountain permanent relocation work in February 2018. In addition to the overhead electrical facilities, an existing DWR underground 13.8kV power feeder cable (Feeder Cable) and associated existing fiber optic system (Fiber Optic System) were compromised during the Incident. Sections of the Power Feeder Cable were exposed by erosion, which has placed the cable at risk of failure. Also, DWR system communications rely on the Fiber Optic System, which is buried underground along the same corridor and, in some places within the same trench, as the Feeder Cable. The proposed Easement would allow the future relocation of the Feeder Cable and the Fiber Optic System. While the existing Fiber Optic System and Feeder Cable will remain in service during construction and installation of the new conduit and cables, they will be decommissioned and abandoned in place after the new Fiber Optic and Feeder Cables are commissioned. Once the new Fiber Optic System and Feeder Cable are relocated, power and communication will be transferred from the existing cables to the new cables, to minimize disruption to Oroville Dam operations. The new Feeder Cable and Fiber Optic System will be installed completely underground in conduit.4 The proposed Easement would grant DWR retroactive permission to occupy the Property to install, operate and maintain the Oroville-Table Mountain Facilities, and to conduct the necessary relocation of the Feeder Cable and the Fiber Optic System. The proposed Easement area is approximately 25.83 acres. The proposed Easement area consists of three (3) separate areas on the Property: 1) a tower line easement area (25.54 acres) for the Oroville-Table Mountain Facilities, 2) an underground cable easement area (.22 acres) for the Feeder Cable and Fiber Optic System, and 3) an underground cable easement area (.07 acres) for the Feeder Cable and Fiber Optic system. All three (3) Easement areas are shown on Exhibit B of the Easement. 3 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance; Environmental Assessment; Amendment of Project License to Reroute Primary Transmission Line, Feather River; August 2017, included herein as Attachment 5 (Environmental Assessment). 4 California Department of Water Resources; Oroville Spillway Emergency Response and Recovery, Resource Report; January 24, 2018, included herein as Attachment 2. Advice 5847-E - 4 - June 11, 2020 Providing an easement for the relocation of these facilities benefits the public. First, the Oroville-Table Mountain Facilities that have already been relocated, had to be moved because they created a physical obstacle that would have interfered with reconstruction of the damaged Oroville Dam spillways.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resources.Pdf
    National Centers for Environmental Information | State Climate Summaries Supplementary Material Resources 1. Abkowitz, M., J. Camp, R. Chen, V. Dale, J. Dunn, D. Kirschke, D. de La Torre ugarte, J. Fu, J. Gilligan, Q. He, D. Larsen, E. Parish, B. Preston, J. Schwartz, A. Vergara, B. Wesh, and T. Wilbanks, 2012: Sustaining Tennessee in the face of climate change: Grand challenges and great opportunities, 72 pp. [Available online at http://www.eenews.net/assets/2012/09/13/document_cw_01.pdf] 2. ADWR, cited 2016: Climate of the Eastern Plateau Planning Area, Arizona Department of Water Resources. [Available online at http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/EasternPlateau/Plannin gAreaOverview/Climate.htm] 3. Allegheny Highlands Climate Change Impacts Initiative, 2015: “On the chopping block” The impacts of global warming and climate change on the Mid-Atlantic Allegheny Highlands: A report from the Allegheny Highlands Climate Change Impacts Initiative, 19pp. [Available online at 4. Amico, C., D. DeBelius, T. Henry, and M. Stiles, cited 2015: Dried out confronting the Texas drought, NPR, [Available online at http://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/drought/] 5. AON Benfield, 2011: United States April & May 2011 Severe Weather Outbreaks, Impact Forecasting, Severe Weather Outbreaks Event Recap Report. [Available online at http://www.aon.com/attachments/reinsurance/201106_us_april_may_severe_weather_out breaks_recap.pdf] 6. AON Benfield, 2013: Hurricane Sandy event recap report: Impact forecasting, 50 pp. [Available online at http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20130514_if_hurricane_sandy_eve nt_recap.pdf] 7. Arizona Climate Extremes, cited 2016: [Available online at https://azclimate.asu.edu/docs/azclimate/ArizonaClimateExtremes.pdf] 8. Arkansas Groundwater Protection and Management Report, 2014: A Supplement to the Arkansas Water Plan, 92pp.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather & Climate Disasters 1980-2021
    U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather & Climate Disasters 1980-2021 https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/ The U.S. has sustained 298 weather and climate disasters since 1980 in which overall damages/costs reached or exceeded $1 billion. Values in parentheses represent the 2021 Consumer Price Index cost adjusted value (if different than original value). The total cost of these 298 events exceeds $1.975 trillion. Drought Flooding Freeze Severe Storm Tropical Cyclone Wildfire Winter Storm 2021 Western Drought and Heatwave - June 2021: Western drought expands and intensifies across many western states. A historic heat wave developed for many days across the Pacific Northwest shattering numerous all-time high temperature records across the region. This prolonged heat dome was maximized over the states of Oregon and Washington and also extended well into Canada. These extreme temperatures impacted several major cities and millions of people. For example, Portland reached a high of 116 degrees F while Seattle reached 108 degrees F. The count for heat-related fatalities is still preliminary and will likely rise further. This combined drought and heat is rapidly drying out vegetation across the West, impacting agriculture and contributing to increased Western wildfire potential and severity. Total Estimated Costs: TBD; 138 Deaths Louisiana Flooding and Central Severe Weather - May 2021: Torrential rainfall from thunderstorms across coastal Texas and Louisiana caused widespread flooding and resulted in hundreds of water rescues. Baton Rouge and Lake Charles experienced flood damage to thousands of homes, vehicles and businesses, as more than 12 inches of rain fell. Lake Charles also continues to recover from the widespread damage caused by Hurricanes Laura and Delta less than 9 months before this flood event.
    [Show full text]
  • Feather Falls: Wildfire Community Assessment and Action Plan Feather Falls
    Feather Falls: Wildfire Community Assessment and Action Plan Feather Falls Wildfire Community Assessment & Action Plan November 17, 2015 1 Feather Falls: Wildfire Community Assessment and Action Plan INDEX I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………3 a. Feather Falls Community At-a-Glance Demographics b. Collaborators who assisted with assessment Section I Attachments:………………………………………………………………….4 Attachment A: Map – Top Boundary_1:100,000 scale Attachment B: Community at Risk List for Butte County – California Fire Alliance Attachment C: Map – CAL FIRE/Butte Unit Battalions II. Definition of Home Ignition Zone………………………………………………………7 III. Description of the severe case wildland fire characteristics that could threaten the area Fire History…………………………………………………………………………8 a. Fire History b. Vegetation Type c. Topography d. Weather Section III Attachments:………………………………………………………………10 Attachment D - Map - Fire History Attachment E - Map - Fire Severity Zones IV. Site Description………………………………………………………………………..12 a. Feather Falls Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Project List b. Battalion Five Priorities Section IV Attachments:………………………………………………………………17 F - Map – Shaded Relief: _1:250,000 G - Map – CAL FIRE/Butte Unit Battalions H - Map – Compass Maps: Street Map V. Assessment Process…………………………………………….……………………23 VI. Important Considerations…………………………………………..…………………24 VII. Observations and Recommendations………………………………….……………26 VIII. Successful Firewise Modifications……………………………………...……………28 IX. Next Steps / Action Plan………………………………………………………………32
    [Show full text]
  • Annex J Nevada Irrigation District
    Annex J Nevada Irrigation District J.1 Introduction This Annex details the hazard mitigation planning elements specific to the Nevada Irrigation District (NID or District), a previously participating jurisdiction to the 2016 Placer County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) Update. This Annex is not intended to be a standalone document, but appends to and supplements the information contained in the Base Plan document. As such, all sections of the Base Plan, including the planning process and other procedural requirements apply to and were met by the District. This Annex provides additional information specific to NID, with a focus on providing additional details on the risk assessment and mitigation strategy for this District. J.2 Planning Process As described above, the District followed the planning process detailed in Chapter 3 of the Base Plan. In addition to providing representation on the Placer County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC), the District formulated their own internal planning team to support the broader planning process requirements. Internal planning participants, their positions, and how they participated in the planning process are shown in Table J-1. Additional details on plan participation and District representatives are included in Appendix A. Table J-1 NID – Planning Team Name Position/Title How Participated Greg Jones Interim General Oversite and Review Manager Chip Close Water Operations Facility vulnerability and risk assessment as well as historical Manager references Doug Roderick Engineering Capital improvement planning and forecasting Manager Keane Sommers Hydroelectric Facility vulnerability and risk assessment as well as historical Manager references Cameron Townsend Environmental Review; Updated and included new relevant watershed hazards Resources Technician Coordination with other community planning efforts is paramount to the successful implementation of this LHMP Update.
    [Show full text]
  • Developed Recreation Sites 5/87 Plumas National Forest
    Management Area 36 (cont'd) PRESCRIPTION ALLOCATION RANGE ALLOTMENT STRATEGIES Allotment Name Grazing Strategy Chase B Horton Canyon East B Horton Canyon South B Burnham B Mapes Canyon C Bald Rock C Arms C Chase Enclosure D Bacher D Bulson D Dotta Neck D 4-333 T 24 N, R 13 E Management Area #37 Lake Davis I 4-334 MANAGEMENT AREA 37 Lake Davis District: Beckwourth Acreage: 16,462 Total 13,146 or 80% PNF Description The Lake Davis Management Area surrounds Lake Davis. It is entirely within Plumas County. The major feature of the area is the "lake", a 4.000 acre reservoir of the California Water System formed by damming Big Grizzly Creek in 1966. Gradual releases provide domestic-use water to Plumas County communities and streamflow to Grizzly Creek and the Middle Fork of the Feather River. Terrain is slightly sloping near the lake, but very steep and rugged between the Walker Mine Road and Crocker Ridge and between the West Side Road and Three Mile Ridge. Elevations range from 5,775 feet, the surface elevation of Lake Davis when full, to 7,693 feet at the top of Smith Peak. Soils have low to moderate erodibility, and risk of instability is dominantly low. Vegetation is sagebrush with scattered pine on the flat terrain near the lake shore, changing to a dense stand of ponderosa pine and fir on the steeper slopes and ridges. Wet stringer meadows surrounded by dense stands of lodgepole pine extend along the major tributary streams on the west side of the lake.
    [Show full text]
  • 8-1 A. Introduction a Wide Range of Recreational Facilities And
    8 RECREATION A. Introduction A wide range of recreational facilities and recreational programs are found in Butte County, offering numerous recreational opportunities to local residents and visitors. Most public recreational facilities and parks in the unincorporated County are owned and/or managed by one of five large independent special districts, or by various local, State and federal agencies, sometimes in joint arrangements. Others, including some facilities located within the incorporated jurisdictions, are owned and managed by the municipalities themselves. Privately-owned, commercial facilities such as campgrounds, golf courses, and bowling alleys also provide an important range of recreational and leisure activities. This chapter describes all of these various types of recreational facilities in Butte County. B. Regulatory Setting Parks and recreational open space are the most significantly regulated types of recreation facility. Provision of parks is generally regulated through parks planning standards, which set forth requirements for dedication of open space, or payment of in-lieu fees, in conjunction with new development. In 1996, the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) published the Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines. In addition, the NRPA has published best practice guidelines for planning, designing, and implementing green infrastructure in parks, financing green infrastructure projects, and safe routes to parks as well as other resource guidelines that can be used as reference by recreation planning agencies. The guidelines are used by many recreation planning agencies as a guide to develop their own standards for their service areas. These national standards serve as a guideline for measurement and are not designed to be considered absolute requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Legislative Report a Summary of EMWD’S Federal and State Legislative Programs
    Annual Legislative Report A Summary of EMWD’s Federal and State Legislative Programs Delivering value to our customers and the communities we serve by providing safe, reliable, economical and environmentally sustainable water, wastewater and recycled water services. This page intentionally left blank Mission To deliver value to our customers and the communities we serve by providing safe, reliable, economical and environmentally sustainable water, wastewater and recycled water services. Vision To provide essential services to our community at a level that exceeds the performance of any other public or private entity. Prepared by the Eastern Municipal Water District Public and Governmental Aairs Department 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Contact Information Eastern Municipal Water District PO Box 8300 | 2270 Trumble Road | Perris, California 92572-8300 T 951.928.3777 | F 951.928.6160 Board of Directors Board President Board Vice-President Board Treasurer David J. Slawson Ronald W. Sullivan Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Board Member Board Member Philip E. Paule Randy A. Record General Manager Paul D. Jones, II, P.E. Board Secretary Sheila Zelaya Public and Governmental Aairs Senior Director Senior Legislative Program Manager Deputy Board Secretary Jolene R. Walsh Danielle N. Coats Joyce A. Messin [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Western Riverside Council of Governments Public Service Fellow Bryan Martinez [email protected] EMWD’s Sacramento, CA Contact Ron Davis Advocacy Ronald L. Davis 916.802.3891 [email protected] EMWD’s Washington, D.C. Contact Van Scoyoc Associates Pete Evich, Laura Morgan-Kessler, and Geoff Bowman 202.737.7391 [email protected] Eastern Municipal Water District Annual Legislative Report Table of Contents I.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Natural Catastrophe Events 2020 Willis Re Eventtm Update Insured Losses and Economic Impact Due to Natural Disasters
    Summary of Natural Catastrophe Events 2020 Willis Re eVENTTM Update Insured losses and economic impact due to natural disasters Volume 9 Natural Catastrophes in 2020 i Table of contents Major natural catastrophes in 2020 per region based on insured losses ..................................................... iii Contact us ..................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. In focus .................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Major natural catastrophes in 2020 ....................................................................................................... 8 3. Other natural catastrophe events by peril and location ....................................................................... 51 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................ 65 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 65 Natural Catastrophes in 2020 ii Major natural catastrophes in 2020 per region based on insured losses *The man-made explosion at Beirut port is included in the map
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino County Vulnerability Assessment
    San Bernardino County San Bernardino County Vulnerability Assessment INTRODUCTION San Bernardino County is actively seeking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as described in its Regional Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan1. At the same time, action must be taken to recognize and prepare for the impacts that may arise from a changing climate. Climate change may increase the frequency or severity of eight primary hazards in Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Climate Change the County: extreme heat, wildfire, drought, flooding, air quality Adaptation and Climate Resilience: How Do and other health and ecological hazards, severe weather, extreme They Relate? wind, and mud- and landslides. Greenhouse gas mitigation strategies This report represents an assessment of these hazards on combat climate change by reducing communities, assets, and ecosystems within the County. The first greenhouse gas emissions. section of the report, Climate Change in the County, provides information on the scientific projections for the climate hazards in Climate adaptation strategies reduce the the County. The section Priority Vulnerability Sectors discusses vulnerability of life, property, and natural potential impact these hazards might have on priority sectors in resources to climate change effects. the County, such as disadvantaged communities, natural Climate resilience refers to the ability of an resources, and transportation and infrastructure. This vulnerability asset, system, or organization to withstand assessment provides information to develop possible adaptation the effects of climate change. Adaptation strategies for addressing these impacts. A Technical Appendix strategies are usually implemented with the provides further information relevant to each section. goal of increasing climate resilience. The County will integrate the findings and recommendations from this report into the Countywide Plan, ensuring that both greenhouse gas mitigation and climate resilience will be core principles of future growth and development.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Region Report
    CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT San Francisco Bay Area Region Report Coordinating Agencies: CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT Introduction to California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment alifornia is a global leader in using, investing in, and advancing research to set proactive climate change policy, and its Climate Change Assessments provide the scientifc foundation for understanding climate- related vulnerability at the local scale and informing resilience actions. The Climate Change Assessments directly inform State policies, plans, programs, and guidance to promote effective and integrated action to Csafeguard California from climate change. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment (Fourth Assessment) advances actionable science that serves the growing needs of state and local-level decision-makers from a variety of sectors. Tis cutting-edge research initiative is comprised of a wide-ranging body of technical reports, including rigorous, comprehensive climate change scenarios at a scale suitable for illuminating regional vulnerabilities and localized adaptation strategies in California; datasets and tools that improve integration of observed and projected knowledge about climate change into decision- making; and recommendations and information to directly inform vulnerability assessments and adaptation strategies for California’s energy sector, water resources and management, oceans and coasts, forests, wildfres, agriculture, biodiversity and habitat, and public health. In addition, these technical reports have been distilled into summary reports and a brochure, allowing the public and decision-makers to easily access relevant fndings from the Fourth Assessment. • A concise summary of the Fourth Assessment’s most important fndings and conclusions. • An in-depth report on how California’s people, built KEY FINDINGS environment, and ecosystems will be impacted by climate change and how we can proactively adapt, based on the Fourth Assessment’s fndings.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex C City of Lincoln
    Annex C City of Lincoln C.1 Introduction This Annex details the hazard mitigation planning elements specific to the City of Lincoln, a previously participating jurisdiction to the 2016 Placer County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) Update. This Annex is not intended to be a standalone document, but appends to and supplements the information contained in the Base Plan document. As such, all sections of the Base Plan, including the planning process and other procedural requirements apply to and were met by the City. This Annex provides additional information specific to Lincoln, with a focus on providing additional details on the risk assessment and mitigation strategy for this community. C.2 Planning Process As described above, Lincoln followed the planning process detailed in Chapter 3 of the Base Plan. In addition to providing representation on the Placer County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC), the City formulated their own internal planning team to support the broader planning process requirements. Internal planning participants, their positions, and how they participated in the planning process are shown in Table C-1. Additional details on Plan participation and City representatives are included in Appendix A. FILL OUT TABLE ON WHO PARTICIPATED. TELL HOW THEY PARTICIPATED (ATTENDED MEETINGS, REVIEWED ANNEX, PROVIDED PAST OCCURRENCE INFO, FILLED OUT CAPABILITY TABLES, PROVIDED MITIGATION ACTIONS, ETC. Table C-1 City of Lincoln – Planning Team Name Position/Title How Participated Coordination with other community planning efforts is paramount to the successful implementation of this LHMP Update. This section provides information on how the City integrated the previously approved 2016 Plan into existing planning mechanisms and programs.
    [Show full text]