DOCSLIB.ORG

M a N a G E M E N T P L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
M a N a G E M E N T P L Long Hollow Heathland M A N A G E M E N T P L A N Contents Abstract 3 Vision 3 Background 4 Issues 5 References 8 Management Prescriptions 9 Weed Control Specifications 11 Mapped Details 12 Long Hollow Heathland Page 2 Abstract Long Hollow Heathland is an area of Significance values consist of the remnant vegetation and has a key role in remnants of a swamp depression, ‘The Bayside’s bushland and open space Long Hollow Swamp’, of local network. It contains woodlands of significance and there are 12 species of regional significance and heathlands of indigenous orchids recorded in the State significance in addition to being the Heathland. Of these, 8 are listed as rare only location for a number of locally in the Melbourne Metropolitan area. significant species. It is a popular local reserve with an It is the site of the most diverse single active Friends Group. remnant of the noted ‘Sandringham Flora’ and is the most biodiverse remnant of Heathland within Bayside. The primary management objective of the Heathland is the maintenance of the diversity of indigenous vegetation. This plan aims to protect the indigenous significant and worthy of protective remnant vegetation found in Long Hollow management. It is the site of the largest Heathland and to ensure its diversity is remnants of regionally significant Low maintained through management Woodland community and Open Heath including fire, weeding and education of vegetation of state significance (Cropper the general community. As an area of 1996). Cropper (1996) also states that remnant vegetation in suburbia, Long Long Hollow is the most biodiverse Hollow Heathland is at least locally remnant of Heathland within Bayside. Long Hollow Heathland MANAGEMENT PLANPage 3 Background The Office of the Registrar of Geographic tree, regenerative burning and weed Names approved the name ‘Long Hollow control with an added emphasis on Heathland’ in February 1999. Prior to environmental education. One of the this, the Heathland was known as the management directions was the removal Beaumaris Campus Heathland. The area of Coast Tea-tree. is situated approximately 20 kilometres south east of the Melbourne GPO. The Group produced two plans, which directed works in the Heathland. They The Heathland is an uneven rectangle in were a Restoration Plan and a Site shape with the east and west sides Clearing Plan. approximately 215 metres in length and the north and south sides 188 metres and A number of controlled burns and a 113 metres respectively. The area number of unplanned burns have covered is approximately 2.2 hectares. occurred in the Heathland. Post-burn Long Hollow is covered in remnant weed control has been priority of the vegetation comprising heathland, Heathland Group. The quality and woodland and even-aged stands of Coast diversity of the indigenous vegetation in Tea-tree (Leptospermum laevigatum). the Heathland can be attributed largely to the work carried out by this group. The Government of Victoria purchased the area of land from Balcombe Road to Pavey (1996) indicates that the Gramatan Avenue in 1957, for educational Heathland is considered Principal habitat purposes. In 1964 the State Electricity in Bayside and this is due to the high Commission of Victoria purchased the diversity of birds. area on the corner of Gramatan Avenue and Reserve Road. The Heathland area The existing vegetation of the Heathland was transferred from the ownership of the is comprised of mature stands of Coast- Education Department to the Department Tea-tree, heathland vegetation in various of Conservation and Natural Resources stages of development, wet heath (now DNRE) in 1993. vegetation and woodland with heath understorey. It is the only reserve in the Prior to the formation of the Long municipality with woodland vegetation Hollow Heathland Group, previously the and is also the sole location for 28 Beaumaris Heathland Group, the former species. 21 regionally rare species can City of Sandringham carried out limited also be found in the Heathland. maintenance in the area. Vegetation management consisted of clearing of The Heathland is Crown land and is Coast Tea-tree and subsequent mowing managed by the appointed Committee of of the understorey. Following their Management, Bayside City Council. formation in 1982, works by the Long Hollow Heathland Group have concentrated on clearing of Coast Tea- Long Hollow Heathland Page 4 Issues This plan is based upon knowledge of Vegetation Management the Reserve with an advisory committee Vegetation management should include a consisting of a member from each of: priority for natural regeneration of the • The Long Hollow Heathland Group indigenous floral community within the • Beaumaris Conservation Society Inc. Heathland. As the largest remnant of the • Bayside City Council original ‘Sandringham Flora’, it is • Department of Natural Resources & important that ecological relationships Environment. within the Heathland be maintained and conserved. This includes the staged eradication of Coast Tea-tree from the Heathland, (excluding Coast Tea-tree in the vegetative buffer system outside the Reserve, which protects the Heathland from external pressures). SIGNIFICANT SPECIES Some orchid species have been identified within the Heathland as rare within the Melbourne Metropolitan area. As such, the remaining orchid colonies need to be protected and maintained accordingly. This may require maintenance of some tree canopy to insure the survival of these colonies. The Wet Heath community is another significant community that needs to be conserved and where necessary regenerated to maintain ecological relationships. Determine and conserve significant species. WEED CONTROL Weed control within the Heathland is an ongoing issue and weed control within the Heathland should be carried out in accordance with Council contract specifications and updated annually in the specification review. Eradication of pest plant species within the Heathland should be conducted. Long Hollow Heathland MANAGEMENT PLANPage 5 Issues Fauna Management Access & Visitor Management Further surveys are required within the Recreational opportunities within the Heathland to determine what species are Heathland need to be consistent with present within the Heathland and which conservation objectives. Degradation of these species are significant. Once within the Heathland can occur from identified, management strategies can be visitor access, especially with informal established to best manage these species cubby-house building and the informal and the floral communities in which they BMX track. Informal paths within the occur. This will enable planting or track network should be rationalised and maintaining provision of appropriate closed where necessary to allow habitat for native fauna and their regeneration of soil stored seed. contribution to the ecosystem. Control, and where possible, eradication Dog droppings bring excessive nutrients of introduced animals using best practise foreign to the heathland community into methods of removal should also be the Reserve. Excess nutrients can lead to conducted within the Heathland. an increase in weed species, which can out-compete the indigenous vegetation. Fire Risk Management Dogs running off leash through the Control of wildfire is an issue within Reserve damage delicate regenerating urban areas. Should wildfire occur within species, such as orchid colonies and the Heathland, control is to be those species regenerating after burns. conducted with minimum damage to the Soil stored seed may also be disturbed. Heathland. Preventative measures to protect facilities and abutting properties Long Hollow Heathland is designated as through the reduction of potential fire a dog ‘on-leash’ area, as are all Bushland hazards within the Heathland. Large reserves, due to the sensitivity of the site branches of deadfall should be scattered to disturbance by dogs. to reduce fire hazard and where necessary, fine fuel portions of deadfall Provision of appropriate interpretational removed. signs and information to visitors regarding the natural and cultural Formal access points need to be clear for features of the Heathland may assist to all relevant emergency services. increase their care of the area. Ecological Fire Regimes Informal BMX track Fire is an important management tool Long Hollow has had an ongoing within the Heathland for maintaining problem with the creation of an informal vegetation diversity. Appropriate fire and unauthorised BMX track within the regimes for the Heathland should Heathland. As a significant area of continue and be carried out in remnant heathland within Bayside, a accordance with Council contract BMX track within Long Hollow does not specifications. Long Hollow Heathland Page 6 Issues comply with the primary objective of this importance of remnant vegetation. Management plan, which is to maintain Increased promotion of the Heathland the biodiveristy of indigenous through local papers, guided walks and vegetation, nor is it considered active working bees may increase ‘appropriate’ enjoyment of Long Hollow. appreciation of the area. Active steps must be taken, in However, it is the aim of this plan that conjunction with an education campaign the conservation status of Long Hollow within the school, to ensure the long- Heathland be maintained, with only low- term removal of the track. Importance of key interpretational facilities provided, to conserving the vegetation must be enhance the appropriate enjoyment and communicated to those involved
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tovvn and COUN1'r,Y PL1\NNING 130ARD
    1952 VICTORIA SEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT 01<' THE TOvVN AND COUN1'R,Y PL1\NNING 130ARD FOI1 THE PERIOD lsr JULY, 1951, TO 30rH JUNE, 1~)52. PHESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 4 (3) OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLA},"NING ACT 1944. Appro:rima.te Cost of Repo,-1.-Preparat!on-not given. PrintJng (\l50 copieti), £225 ]. !'!! Jtutlt.ortt!): W. M. HOUSTON, GOVERNMENT PRINTER, MELBOURNE. No. 5.-[2s. 3d.].-6989/52. INDEX Page The Act-Suggested Amendments .. 5 Regulations under the Act 8 Planning Schemes-General 8 Details of Planning Schemes in Course of Preparation 9 Latrobe Valley Sub-Regional Planning Scheme 12 Abattoirs 12 Gas and Fuel Corporation 13 Outfall Sewer 13 Railway Crossings 13 Shire of Narracan-- Moe-Newborough Planning Scheme 14 Y allourn North Planning Scheme 14 Shire of Morwell- Morwell Planning Scheme 14 Herne's Oak Planning Scheme 15 Yinnar Planning Scheme 15 Boolarra Planning Scheme 16 Shire of Traralgon- Traralgon Planning Scheme 16 Tyers Planning Scheme 16 Eildon Sub-Regional Planning Scheme 17 Gelliondale Sub-Regional Planning Schenu• 17 Club Terrace Planning Scheme 17 Geelong and Di~triet Town Planning Scheme 18 Portland and DiHtriet Planning Scheme 18 Wangaratta Sub-Regional Planning Scheme 19 Bendigo and District Joint Planning Scheme 19 City of Coburg Planning Scheme .. 20 City of Sandringham Planning Seheme 20 City of Moorabbin Planning Scheme~Seetion 1 20 City of Prahran Plaml'ing Seheme 20 City of Camberwell Planning Scheme 21 Shire of Broadml'adows Planning Scheme 21 Shire of Tungamah (Cobmm) Planning Scheme No. 2 21 Shire of W odonga Planning Scheme 22 City of Shepparton Planning t::lcheme 22 Shire of W arragul Planning Seh<>liH' 22 Shire of Numurkah- Numurkah Planning Scheme 23 Katunga.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Shadow of Metropolitan Planning Local Plan Making in Melbourne, 1946 to 1976
    In the Shadow of Metropolitan Planning Local Plan Making in Melbourne, 1946 to 1976 Dr Benno Engels School of Global, Urban and Social Studies RMIT University Victoria, Australia [email protected] Melbourne has evolved and changed over time in response to the many challenges that this city has faced over the last century and a half. Some of this change was due to forces that lay beyond the control of those who governed it whereas other changes had been guided by local government acts and a handful of metropolitan level strategic plans. Largely absent from the historical narratives that have been written about the planning of Melbourne is what had happened to urban planning at the local level. This is a serious gap in our understanding of Melbourne’s historical urban development when it is remembered that local councils and shires had been charged with enforcing metropolitan strategy since 1955. It was at the local government level that the detailed strategic and statutory planning was undertaken but it was also here at the local level that a city’s capacity to respond to any newly emerging challenges were either expedited or stymied. In an attempt to shed some light on this much neglected facet of Melbourne’s urban planning history this paper proposes to investigate how much urban planning took place at the local level and what forms it took between 1944 to 1976, plus what factors may have impacted upon the local plan making process. Keywords — Local planning schemes; Town and Country Planning Board, Melbourne. INTRODUCTION Daniel Burnham, the famous American architect and urban planner of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, has been quoted as saying, ‘…make no little plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Battleship to Breakwater
    THE SANDRINGHAM HISTORICAL SERIES No. 3 H M V S CERBERUS BATTLESHIP TO BREAKWATER Historic Iron Monitor Warship of the Victorian Navy by R.J. Herd, B.Sc., F.R.I.N.A., M.I.E., Aust. ABOUT THE SANDRINGHAM HISTORICAL SERIES The previous booklets in the Series are: No. 1: The first people of Black Rock − The Bunurong Tribe of Aborigines, 1982. No. 2: Black Rock House, 1983. It is intended that there be further publications in this series dealing with other aspects of Sandringham's history. The series is published by the City of Sandringham, Municipal Offices, Royal Avenue, Sandringham, 3191, Victoria, Australia, telephone (03) 598 8111. National Library of Australia Card Number and ISBN 1ST EDITION MAY, 1986 ISBN: 0−9596863−8−X COPYRIGHT: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 Early Melbourne 3 Protection for Port Phillip 3 The Name 6 The Design 7 The Voyage from England 11 Fifty−Three Years of Service 12 Acquisition by Sandringham Council 14 The Future 15 Recollections of Commander R. S. Veale (Retired) 15 List of Relics 15 Further Reading 15 Acknowledgments 16 Main Features of Cerberus 17 Appendix 1 19 Appendix 2 20 Appendix 3 23 Appendix 4 24 HMVS 'CERBERUS' − BATTLESHIP TO BREAKWATER 1. INTRODUCTION This volume in the Sandringham Environment Series deals with the 'Cerberus', the iron−clad man−o−war and former flagship of the Victorian Navy that now lies rusting as a breakwater for small craft in Half Moon Bay, Black Rock. The 'Cerberus' is one of the most historically important naval vessels in esistence.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
    SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Sue Forster1.55 MB
    Inquiry into Environmental Infrastructure for Growing Populations by Sue Forster Personal statement I am providing this submission in a personal capacity. My responses to this Inquiry are based on five years of experience as an environmental volunteer in City of Bayside reserves and Bayside Community Nursery, and ten months’ experience as Convenor for the Friends of Bay Road Heathland Sanctuary, Sandringham (see Appendix). Terms of Reference ‘The Legislative Assembly Environment and Planning Committee is seeking information on how to secure environmental infrastructure for Melbourne and regional Victoria now and into the future. In recent years, the rapid population growth of Melbourne and key regional centres has brought many benefits but also poses challenges to the preservation of existing infrastructure. Significant differences in the availability of environmental infrastructure also exist between different suburbs and different regions. More recently, COVID-19 has highlighted the importance of access to local parks, open space and other forms of environmental infrastructure.’ My understanding is that the Committee is interested in the views and insights of stakeholders on any aspect of the Terms of Reference, including the following issues: 1. the benefits of accessing and using different types of environmental infrastructure; 2. the impact of population growth in Melbourne and regional centres on the provision and preservation of environmental infrastructure; 3. differences in the availability of environmental infrastructure between different suburbs and between different regional centres; 4. the effectiveness of current legislation and planning provisions in securing environmental infrastructure; 5. existing delays or obstacles to securing environmental infrastructure; 6. the impact of COVID-19 on the importance, use and design of environmental infrastructure; 7.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Bayside Heritage Review Building Citations
    CITY OF BAYSIDE HERITAGE REVIEW BUILDING CITATIONS VOLUME 2 PART I CITY OF BAYSIDE HERITAGE REVIEW BUILDING CITATIONS VOLUME 2 PART I Allom Lovell & Associates Conservation Architects 35 Little Bourke Street Melbourne 3000 February 1999 City of Bayside Heritage Review: Building Citations TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 2 PART I TABLE OF CONTENTS i CONSULTANTS ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.01 Background and Brief 1 1.02 Methodology 1 1.03 Designation of Structures 1 1.04 Datasheets 2 2.0 SUMMARY LIST OF DATASHEETS 5 2.01 Summary List of Datasheets 5 3.0 DATASHEETS A-F 19 PART II 4.0 DATASHEETS G-N 411 PART III 5.0 DATASHEETS O-Z 733 APPENDIX A SUMMARY LIST OF C GRADE BUILDINGS APPENDIX B SUMMARY LIST OF DEMOLISHED BUILDINGS Allom Lovell & Associates i City of Bayside Heritage Review: Building Citations CONSULTANTS This report was prepared by: Robyn Riddett Allom Lovell & Associates Amanda Matthews George Phillips Katrina Place Simon Reeves Emma Watson John Patrick John Patrick Pty Ltd, Landscape Architects Simon Howe Geoffrey Down Historian ii Allom Lovell & Associates City of Bayside Heritage Review: Building Citations ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the following people: The City of Bayside Steering Committee: Cr Alex del Porto Mayor, City of Bayside Cr Elizabeth Francis Councillor, City of Bayside Cr Jill McKiggan Councillor, City of Bayside Cr Craig Tucker Councillor, City of Bayside Melissa Rogers Urban Design Co-ordinator Michael Top Development Manager In addition to: Neil
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Iing Policies for the Melbourne Metropolitan Region Plan & Epa Library
    IING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION PLAN & EPA LIBRARY M0026673 MINISTRY FOR PLANNING AfJD ENVIRONMENT LIBRARY PLANNING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION NOVEMBER 1971 711.4099 731770 451 MEL:M Planning policies for the (1971) Melbourne metropolitan region MELBOURNE AND METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS Chairman of the Board: A. H. Croxford, L.L.B. Honorary Commissioners (as at 14th September, 1971) R. Bassett, M.B.E., J.P. (City of Footscray) T. H. King (City of Malvern) A. E. Beckett, J.P. (City of Sandringham) G. F. Knowles, J.P. (Shire of Cranbourne) E. W. Best, C.M.G., J.P. (City of Melbourne) A. C. Laing, M.Sc, A.O.S.M. (City of Heidelberg) W. G. Boundy, J.P. (City of Camberwell) J. D. Langdon, J.P. (City of Richmond) G. R. Bricker, J.P. (City of Moorabbin) F. W. Le Page (City of Moorabbin) H. W. Cousins, I.S.M., J.P. (City of Essendon) E. O. Lundgren, J.P. (City of Box Hill) A. P. Donnelly, J.P. (City of Oakleigh) K. C. Marriott, J.P. (City of Springvale) G. C. Dreverman, J.P. (Shire of Eltham) L. W. Mason (City of Brighton) J. C. Duggan, J.P. (City of St. Kilda) V. R. Michael, J.P. (Shire of Whittlesea) D. W. Dumbrell (Shire of Bulla) K. E. Miller, J.P. (City of Dandenong) Sir Bernard Evans, Kt., D.S.O., E.D., F.R.A.I.A. (City of K. G. Mitchell (City of Broadmeadows) Melbourne) I. A. McNab (City of Keilor) M.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Bayside Inter-War & Post-War Heritage Study
    City of Bayside Inter-War & Post-War Heritage Study Volume 2 of 2 The Lindsay House in Boxshall Street, Brighton, 1942 (Source: G Biers, Houses of Australia) Prepared for The City of Bayside May 2008 This Heritage Study has been undertaken in accordance with the principles of the Burra Charter adopted by ICOMOS Australia This document has been completed by David Wixted and Simon Reeves © The City of Bayside & heritage ALLIANCE 2008 Final approved version 11 May 2010 Volume 2 of 2 Datasheets for New Individual Heritage Places Appendix: Additional Places Identified 7.0 Individual Places of Heritage Significance No Place Street Address Suburb Page 7.01 Sandringham Masonic Centre 23 Abbott Street Sandringham 5 7.02 Black Rock Public Hall 574-576 Balcombe Road Black Rock 7 7.03 House and doctor’s clinic 32 Bay Street Brighton 9 7.04 House 46 Bay Street Brighton 11 7.05 House 242 Beach Road Black Rock 13 7.06 Houses (pair) 16 & 18 Berwick Avenue Brighton 15 7.07 Sandringham & District Hospital 191 Bluff Road Sandringham 17 7.08 House 207 Bluff Road Sandringham 19 7.09 Olive Phillips Free Kindergarten 28 Bodley Street Beaumaris 21 7.10 House 9 Boxshall Street Brighton 23 7.11 Fire station and flats (former) 10-14 Boxshall Street Brighton 25 7.12 Duplex 1 & 3 Burston Place Brighton 27 7.13 Maisonettes (Malaru Flats) 33, 35, 37 & 39 Campbell Street Brighton 29 7.14 House 60 Centre Road/2a Billson St Brighton East 31 7.15 Flats 8 Cole Street Brighton 33 7.16 House 21 Collins Street Brighton 35 7.17 House 245 Dendy Street Brighton East 37 7.18 St
    [Show full text]
  • The Places We Keep: the Heritage Studies of Victoria and Outcomes for Urban Planners
    The places we keep: the heritage studies of Victoria and outcomes for urban planners Robyn Joy Clinch Submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Architecture & Planning) June 2012 Faculty of Architecture, Building & Planning The University of Melbourne Abstract The incentive for this thesis that resulted from an investigation into the history of my heritage house, developed from my professional interest in the planning controls on heritage places. This was further motivated by my desire to reinvent my career as an urban planner and to use my professional experience in management, marketing and information technology. As a result, the aim of this thesis was to investigate the relationship between the development of the heritage studies of Victoria and the outcome of those documents on planning decisions made by urban planners. The methods used included a simulated experience that established a methodology for the thesis. In addition, interviews were conducted with experts in the field that provided a context for understanding the influencing factors of when, where, by whom, with what, why and how the studies were conducted. These interviews also contributed to the understanding of how the historical research had been undertaken and used to establish the significance of places and how this translated into outcomes for urban planners. Case studies in the form of Tribunal determinations have been used to illustrate key outcomes for urban planners. A large amount of information including that relating to the historical background of the studies plus a collection of indicative content from over 400 heritage studies was traversed.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Sandringham
    CITY OF SANDRINGHAM Planning of retail centres 711 . 5522 0194 51 SAN I I J - -----~-- -~~--- ~-~ 1 DEPUTA'I'ION '1'0 THE MINISTER FOR PLANNING The Honourable, L.S. Lieberman, M.P. r, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANDRINGHAM PLANNING OF RETAIL CENTRES THURSDAY 16th &UGUST, 1979 Dear Mr. Minister, Thank you for the opportunity to put before you matters of serious concern to the Council of the City of Sandringh~m. The Council of the City of Sandringham assumed its town planning responsibilities in 1948 with the adoption of the Sandringham Planning Scheme for its industrial area. Since that time most of the municipality has become fully developed. The coastal residenti~l character of Sandringham largely reflecti the vision and the long term strategies of past Councils with recent development superimposed on the older coastal settlements without disturbing t~e character and identity of the city. In essence these strategies, through the Councils local government and coastal management roles, often through direct consultation with other public authoritiei, have resulted in:- - the provision of metropolitan Melbourne and the residents of Sandringham with a coastal reserve which" includes some of the finest beaches in the metropolitan area (mainly funded from Council revenues) not spoilt by inappropriate development. "" through the long term purchase of indiviaual allotments, a magnif- icent municipal golf-co~rse which is completemented by one of the te~ best privately owned golf courses iothe world. - throu~the operation of its planning controls development of a relatively attractive and significant industri~! - employment ar2il. preserva~jon of 5 acres of some of the last remaining indigenous heathland in the Metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2019 Newsletter
    Second Quarter 2019 May 2019 Newsletter Dr Don Garden, OAM, FFAHS, FRHSV, President of the Royal Historical Society of Victoria and Associate Professor, University of Melbourne, as he gave his interesting address to our members at the Annual General Meeting on 3 March 2019. Sandringham & District Historical Society Inc., Newsletter, May 2019 Articles The Table of Contents in the (PDF) version has page navigation within the Table of Contents 2 document. Just mouse (hover) over an Next Event 2 article in the Table of Contents (TOC) New Committee 3 and your pointer changes to a hand, Presidents’ Report 4 then click and you go straight to the article. Mousing over any end of article Collections Report 5 SDHS symbol and clicking takes you back to Significant Funeral Record Collection 6 the TOC. (No GPS required). Donation Maria Millard and the Bigamist 9 Note this does not work on the printed version. :-( Family Reunion 12 A Magnificent Man and his Flying 13 Machines Photos from around the Group 18 Secretary’s Report 19 Secretary’s Notices 20 Treasurer’s Report 21 Application for Membership 22 Volunteer’s Application 23 Newsletter Team 23 Next Event Sunday 9 June at 2:00 pm SDHS Resource Centre, 31 Abbott Street, Sandringham General Meeting Page 2 of 23 Sandringham & District Historical Society Inc., May 2019 SANDRINGHAM & DISTRICT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC. Inc. No. A0018151X ABN 75 395 603 584 Contact Details: 31 Abbott Street, Sandringham, 3191 PO Box 8, Sandringham, 3191 Telephone: (03) 9597 0985 Web: www.sandringhamhistorical.org.au Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Sandringham-District-Historical-Society- Inc-1135867603110493/ Email: [email protected] Your newsletter for May 2019 It’s Your History Too NEW COMMITTEE President: Lorraine Huddle Vice President: Olivia Abbay Secretary: Gwen Zammit Treasurer: Michael Miliotis Committee Members: Margaret Tripp (Hon.
    [Show full text]