DOCSLIB.ORG

EOU2019 Abstracts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Programme and Abstracts Edited by Erik Matthysen, Péter L. Pap, Gábor M. Bóné 12th European Ornithologists’ Union Congress 26 – 30 August 2019 Cluj Napoca Romania ORGANIZERS: SPONSORS /EXHIBITORS: https://conference.eounion.org/2019/ Copyright © 2019 European Ornithologists’ Union PUBLISHED BY THE SCIENCTIFIC PROGRAMME COMMITTEE AND THE LOCAL ORGANISING COMMITTEE Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License (the “License”). You may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an “AS IS” BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. The design of this booklet is based on the Legrand Orange Book LATEX Template by Mathias Legrand (HTTP://WWW.LATEXTEMPLATES.COM) and was conceptualized by Zoltán Barta. Photograph credits: Attila Nagy, Ferenc Kósa, Péter L. Pap, Sebastian Bugariu, Konrád Zelina Conference logo is designed by Elemér Könczey APART FROM CORRECTING FOR OBVIOUS TYPOS, THE ABSTRACTS ARE PUBLISHED AS THEY WERE SUBMITTED BY THEIR AUTHORS. A Web based version of this booklet can be found at http://conference.eounion.org/wp-content/uploads/EOU2019_abstracts.pdf First printing, August 2019 Contents I General information 1 Welcome messages .....................................................6 1.1 Message from the EOU President6 1.2 Message from local organizers6 2 Organisers ..............................................................8 2.1 Local Organising Committee8 2.2 Scientific Programme Committee8 3 Related events ..........................................................9 II Programme 4 Monday, 26th August, 2019 .............................................. 11 4.1 Plenary 11 5 Tuesday, 27th August, 2019 .............................................. 12 5.1 Plenary 12 5.2 Parallel symposia I 12 5.3 Plenary 14 5.4 Parallel oral sessions I 15 6 Wednesday, 28th August, 2019 .......................................... 25 6.1 Plenary 25 6.2 Parallel symposia II 25 6.3 Plenary 27 6.4 Parallel oral sessions II 28 7 Thursday, 29th August, 2019 ............................................. 38 7.1 Excursion 38 8 Friday, 30th August, 2019 ................................................ 39 8.1 Plenary 39 8.2 Parallel oral sessions III 39 8.3 Plenary 42 8.4 Parallel oral sessions IV 42 III Abstracts 9 Plenaries ............................................................... 47 10 Symposia .............................................................. 50 11 Oral sessions ........................................................... 76 12 Posters ................................................................ 139 INDEX Author Index .......................................................... 217 I General information 1 Welcome messages ..................6 1.1 Message from the EOU President 1.2 Message from local organizers 2 Organisers ...........................8 2.1 Local Organising Committee 2.2 Scientific Programme Committee 3 Related events .......................9 1. Welcome messages 1.1 Message from the EOU President The European Ornithological Union is very happy to announce that the venue of the 12th EOU Congress will be in Cluj, Romania in August 2019. Cluj will be a perfect setting for the congress as being situated in a part of Europe that has not so far hosted our congresses. This will provide us with great opportunities to experience this very beautiful region and the visit will surely be a memory for life. We will be in the hands of a very devoted group of local organisers headed by Péter L. Pap ensuring that the congress in itself will also be memorable. The EOU Congresses aim at providing opportunities for avian researchers of all fields and from all corners of Europe and beyond, to meet in a friendly atmosphere to share ideas and discuss recent results and conservation concerns. I will take the opportunity to encourage you to participate in this vibrating event and to warmly welcome you to the Cluj congress in 2019. Jan-Åke Nilsson President 1.2 Message from local organizers It is a great honor for the three institutions, the Babes, -Bolyai Univerity, the Milvus Group – Bird and Nature Protection Association, and the Romanian Ornithological Society, to take the responsibility of organizing the forthcoming European Ornithologist’s Union congress in Cluj, Romania. As well, it is a great pleasure to host such a prestigious community of bird lovers from all over Europe, encompassing professional scientists and conservationists, experienced seniors and junior undergraduate or PhD students. With this congress which will be organized in the eastern corner of Europe, some of our long lasting dreams appear to be fulfilled. Among these are: (1) to advertise the nature and bird diversity values we still have in this region, (2) to strengthen the connection between East and West and between South and North in the European ornithologists community, and (3) to direct the attention of national and local authorities, as well as the public, to our scientific and naturalist community in Romania, which has reached the maturity to bring to Cluj such a prestigious international congress. We all are aware of the crisis of decreasing bird populations across Europe, which initially started in western European countries, and which later spread out to eastern regions of Europe. We, scientists and conservationists, are responsible for unraveling the causes of this negative process, for offering solutions, and for making progress to halt the loss of biodiversity across Europe and the whole Globe. By your presence at this conference, you highlight to Romanian people the value of the natural assets they still have, and show them that the rich bidiversity and healthy bird populations are worth preserving. Welcome messages 7 We are happy to welcome you in Cluj, where you will enjoy the warm hospitality of Romanians and our bird-friendly landcapes during the mid-congress excursion, and the vibrant cultural and social life of our city. We are looking forward to welcoming you in Cluj for the 12th EOU congress in August 2019. Péter L. Pap Convener 2. Organisers 2.1 Local Organising Committee • Péter L. Pap, Babes, -Bolyai University (President) • Zoltán Benko,˝ Romanian Ornithological Society • Gábor Máté Bóné, Milvus Group Bird and Nature Protection Association • Teodora Doms, a, Romanian Ornithological Society • Judith Papp, Milvus Group Bird and Nature Protection Association • Tamás Papp, Milvus Group Bird and Nature Protection Association • Alexandru Stermin, Babes, -Bolyai University • Zoltán Szabó D., Milvus Group Bird and Nature Protection Association • Csongor I. Vágási, Babes, -Bolyai University • Orsolya Vincze, Babes, -Bolyai University • Local Volunteer Team (Denisa Kalisch, Anca-Ioana Margea, Andrei Dinu, Sara Botezan, Mihaela Miron, Andreea-Mihaela Ples, a, Raluca Pintea, Eszter Ilona, Mirela-Adriana Buda, Carla Andreea Culda, Janka Pénzes, Ana-Maria Neaca,˘ Valentin Adrian Kiss, Anna Dénes, Attila Marton, Vlad-S, tefan Ghioci, Izabella- Katalin Sprîncenatu, Martina-Cristina Matei, Alexandru Cat˘ alin˘ Birau,˘ Zsófia Tóth) • Events Design, Cluj Napoca (Paula Coman, Olesia Matros, , Flavia Burlibas, a, Cristina Buzan, Marian Fangli) 2.2 Scientific Programme Committee • Erik Matthysen, University of Antwerp, Belgium (Chair) • Jan-Åke Nilsson, University of Lund, Sweden • Tamer Albayrak, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Burdur, Turkey • Jan Engler, University of Ghent, Belgium • Arne Hegemann, University of Lund, Sweden • Alfonzo Marzal, University of Extremadura, Spain • James Reynolds, University of Birmingham, UK • Judy Shamoun-Baranes, Universiteit of Amsterdam, Netherlands • Toni Laaksonen, University of Turku, Finland • Mark Mainwaring, University of Montana, USA 3. Related events MIGRANT LANDBIRD STUDY GROUP SYMPOSIUM • August 24th-25th, EOU2019 Cluj-Napoca, Romania BIOLOGICAL DATABASES AND DATA STORING PRE-CONGRESS MEETING • August 25th, EOU2019 Cluj-Napoca, Romania ECOTONE TELEMETRY WORKSHOP • August 25th, EOU2019 Cluj-Napoca, Romania II Programme 4 Monday, 26th August, 2019 ........... 11 4.1 Plenary 5 Tuesday, 27th August, 2019 ........... 12 5.1 Plenary 5.2 Parallel symposia I 5.3 Plenary 5.4 Parallel oral sessions I 6 Wednesday, 28th August, 2019 ....... 25 6.1 Plenary 6.2 Parallel symposia II 6.3 Plenary 6.4 Parallel oral sessions II 7 Thursday, 29th August, 2019 .......... 38 7.1 Excursion 8 Friday, 30th August, 2019 ............. 39 8.1 Plenary 8.2 Parallel oral sessions III 8.3 Plenary 8.4 Parallel oral sessions IV 4. Monday, 26th August, 2019 Registration 14:00 - 18:00 Student’s Cultural House Opening Session 18:00 - 18:30 Plenary Hall 4.1 Plenary 18:30 - 19:30 Plenary Hall Peter L. Pap Bird conservation efforts in Romania Dan Hulea, Tamás Papp P-0, p. 47 Reception 19:30 - 21:00 Student’s Cultural House 5. Tuesday, 27th August, 2019 5.1 Plenary 09:00 - 10:00 Plenary Hall Barbara Helm 09:00 The small pelagics: ecology of prions and storm-petrels Petra Quillfeldt P-1, p. 47 Coffee break 10:00 - 10:30 University Building 5.2 Parallel symposia I Symposium: Shifting the focus: avian life-history stages from the perspective of understudied hormonal systems 10:30 - 12:05 Wryneck Sara Lupi and Pablo Salmón 10:35 The role of thyroid hormones in coordinating
Recommended publications
  • 345 Fieldfare Put Your Logo Here

    345 Fieldfare Put Your Logo Here

    Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 345 Fieldfare Fieldfare. Adult. Male (09-I). Song Thrush FIELDFARE (Turdus pilaris ) IDENTIFICATION 25-26 cm. Grey head; red-brown back; grey rump and dark tail; pale underparts; pale flanks spotted black; white underwing coverts; yellow bill with ochre tip. Redwing Fieldfare. Pattern of head, underwing co- verts and flank. SIMILAR SPECIES Song Thrush has orange underwing coverts; Redwing has reddish underwing coverts; Mistle Thrush has white underwing coverts, but lacks pale supercilium and its rump isn’t grey. Mistle Thrush http://blascozumeta.com Write your website here Page 1 Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 345 Fieldfare SEXING Male with dark or black tail feathers; red- dish feathers on back with blackish center; most have a broad mark on crown feathers. Female with dark brown tail feathers but not black; dull reddish feathers on back with dark centre (but not blackish); most have a thin mark on crown feathers. CAUTION: some birds of both sexes have similar pattern on crown feathers. Fieldfare. Sexing. Pattern of tail: left male; right fe- male. Fieldfare. Sexing. Pat- AGEING tern of Since this species doesn’t breed in Aragon, only crown feat- 2 age groups can be recognized: hers: top 1st year autumn/2nd year spring with moult male; bot- limit within moulted chestnut inner greater co- tom female. verts and retained juvenile outer greater coverts, shorter and duller with traces of white tips; pointed tail feathers.
  • What Is So Rare?

    What Is So Rare?

    WHAT IS SO RARE? As a Fieldfare in April? In Massachusetts, perhaps only a Western Reef Heron or a White-faced Ibis. April here is a month of avian surprises. The 1986 birdwatching spring was off to a happy start with the discovery by schoolteacher Ralph Richards, during a lonely vigil on the cold and rainy Sunday of April 6, of a Fieldfare Turdus pilaris) in a Concord cornfield near the Sudbury River. According ta a bulletin promptly issued by the Massachusetts Audubon Society, this is a first state record, and there have been, s-ince 1878, ten prior records in North America, the most recent being the occurrence of four Fieldfares in St. John's, Newfoundland, from December 1985 to mid-January 1986. "It seems not unlikely that the Massachusetts bird originated with the same midwinter flight that brought the Newfoundland birds to North America. ..." In winter, the Fieldfare ranges from southern Scandinavia, the British Isles, and central Europe south to the Mediterranean. Outside of the breeding season, the bird's habitat choice is open fields and pastures, where it occurs gregariously in large flocks, often accompanied by Redwings (Turdus iliacus). The Fieldfare nests in northern Scandinavia (it is Norway's most common thrush), in north and central continental Europe east to Siberia, and also in Iceland and southern Greenland. The story of the establishment of the disjunct Greenland population is well documented. In January 1937, a strong southeast gale swept a flock of Fieldfares across Europe and the Atlantic to the island of Jan Mayen and the Greenland coast.
  • Ticks and Mites from a Wild Bird Survey Performed by the Wild Animal Medical Center of Rakuno Gakuen University in Japan

    Ticks and Mites from a Wild Bird Survey Performed by the Wild Animal Medical Center of Rakuno Gakuen University in Japan

    J. Acarol. Soc. Jpn., 25(S1): 189-192. March 25, 2016 © The Acarological Society of Japan http://www.acarology-japan.org/ 189 Ticks and mites from a wild bird survey performed by the Wild Animal Medical Center of Rakuno Gakuen University in Japan 1, 2 3 2, 3 Tomoo YOSHINO , Kii USHIYAMA and Mitsuhiko ASAKAWA * 1Kushiro Zoo, Kushiro, Hokkaido 085-0201, Japan 2Wild Animal Medical Center, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido 069-8501, Japan 3Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido 069-8501, Japan ABSTRACT A summary of avian ticks and mites from an epidemiological survey performed by the Wild Animal Medical Center of the Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine of Rakuno Gakuen University is reported, with errata for mite taxa. Ten taxa were recorded, and their taxonomic positions are shown in a table. Key words: ticks, mites, birds, Wild Animal Medical Center, Japan Epidemiological surveys are an essential conservation tool for fully understanding infectious diseases. In 2004, we began an investigation of avian parasitic diseases at the Wild Animal Medical Center of the Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine of Rakuno Gakuen University, Japan (Asakawa 2010; Asakawa et al. 2002, 2013; Hirayama et al. 2013). This paper summarizes the findings of seven publications on avian ticks and parasitic mites (Nakamura et al. 2003; Uemura et al. 2010; Yoshino et al. 2003, 2009a, b, 2011, 2013). During submission of a publication for the proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Acarology, Kyoto, taxonomical inconsistencies, including invalid names or synonyms for mite species, were reported to us.
  • Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 A) Total in Grid Squares SP0172, SP0272, SP0273, SP0274, SP0275, SP0276, SP

    Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 A) Total in Grid Squares SP0172, SP0272, SP0273, SP0274, SP0275, SP0276, SP

    Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 A) Total in grid squares SP0172, SP0272, SP0273, SP0274, SP0275, SP0276, SP0370, SP0371, SP0372, SP0374, SP0375, SP0376, SP0469, SP0470, SP0471, SP0472, SP0473, SP0474, SP0475, SP0476, SP0569, SP0570, SP0571, SP0572, SP0573, SP0574, SP0575 Barn Owl Green Sandpiper Pochard Barnacle Goose Green Woodpecker Red Kite Blackbird Greenfinch Redshank Blackcap Grey Heron Redwing Black-headed Gull Grey Wagtail Reed Bunting Blue Tit Greylag Goose Reed Warbler Bullfinch Herring Gull Ring Ouzel Buzzard Hobby Robin Canada Goose House Martin Rook Carrion Crow House Sparrow Sand Martin Caspian Gull Jackdaw Scaup Chaffinch Jay Sedge Warbler Chiffchaff Kestrel Shoveler Coal Tit Kingfisher Siskin Collared Dove Lapwing Skylark Common Gull Lesser Black-backed Gull Smew Common Sandpiper Lesser Redpoll Snipe Common Tern Lesser Whitethroat Song Thrush Coot Linnet Sparrowhawk Cormorant Little Egret Starling Cuckoo Little Grebe Stock Dove Curlew Little Owl Stonechat Dunnock Long-tailed Tit Swallow Feral Pigeon Magpie Swift Fieldfare Mallard Teal Gadwall Mandarin Treecreeper Garden Warbler Meadow Pipit Tufted Duck Goldcrest Mistle Thrush Turnstone Golden Plover Moorhen Wheatear Goldeneye Mute Swan Whitethroat Goldfinch Nuthatch Wigeon Goosander Osprey Willow Warbler Great Crested Grebe Oystercatcher Wood Pigeon Great Grey Shrike Peregrine Woodcock Great Northern Diver Pheasant Wren Great Spotted Woodpecker Pied Wagtail Yellowhammer Great Tit Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 B) Individual grid
  • (Dendrocopos Syriacus) and Middle Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocoptes Medius) Around Yasouj City in Southwestern Iran

    (Dendrocopos Syriacus) and Middle Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocoptes Medius) Around Yasouj City in Southwestern Iran

    Archive of SID Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics (IJAB) Vol.15, No.1, 99-105, 2019 ISSN: 1735-434X (print); 2423-4222 (online) DOI: 10.22067/ijab.v15i1.81230 Comparison of nest holes between Syrian Woodpecker (Dendrocopos syriacus) and Middle Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocoptes medius) around Yasouj city in Southwestern Iran Mohamadian, F., Shafaeipour, A.* and Fathinia, B. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran (Received: 10 May 2019; Accepted: 9 October 2019) In this study, the nest-cavity characteristics of Middle Spotted and Syrian Woodpeckers as well as tree characteristics (i.e. tree diameter at breast height and hole measurements) chosen by each species were analyzed. Our results show that vertical entrance diameter, chamber vertical depth, chamber horizontal depth, area of entrance and cavity volume were significantly different between Syrian Woodpecker and Middle Spotted Woodpecker (P < 0.05). The average tree diameter at breast height and nest height between the two species was not significantly different (P > 0.05). For both species, the tree diameter at breast height and nest height did not significantly correlate. The directions of nests’ entrances were different in the two species, not showing a preferentially selected direction. These two species chose different habitats with different tree coverings, which can reduce the competition between the two species over selecting a tree for hole excavation. Key words: competition, dimensions, nest-cavity, primary hole nesters. INTRODUCTION Woodpeckers (Picidae) are considered as important excavator species by providing cavities and holes to many other hole-nesting species (Cockle et al., 2011). An important part of habitat selection in bird species is where to choose a suitable nest-site (Hilden, 1965; Stauffer & Best, 1982; Cody, 1985).
  • Cooperative Breeding Shapes Post&#X2010;Fledging Survival in An

    Cooperative Breeding Shapes Post‐Fledging Survival in An

    Received: 17 August 2016 | Revised: 2 December 2016 | Accepted: 22 December 2016 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2744 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Cooperative breeding shapes post-fledging survival in an Afrotropical forest bird Dries Van de Loock1,2,3 | Diederik Strubbe1 | Liesbeth De Neve1 | Mwangi Githiru2,4 | Erik Matthysen3 | Luc Lens1 1Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Abstract 2Department of Zoology, National Museums For avian group living to be evolutionary stable, multiple fitness benefits are expected. of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya Yet, the difficulty of tracking fledglings, and thus estimating their survival rates, limits 3Evolutionary Ecology Group, University of our knowledge on how such benefits may manifest postfledging. We radio- tagged Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Wilrijk, Belgium 4Wildlife Works, Voi, Kenya breeding females of the Afrotropical cooperatively breeding Placid greenbul (Phyllastrephus placidus) during nesting. Tracking these females after fledging permit- Correspondence Dries Van de Loock, Terrestrial Ecology Unit, ted us to locate juvenile birds, their parents, and any helpers present and to build in- Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, dividual fledgling resighting datasets without incurring mortality costs or causing 9000 Ghent, Belgium Email: [email protected] premature fledging due to handling or transmitter effects. A Bayesian framework was used to infer age- specific mortality rates in relation to group size, fledging date, mater- Funding information Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Grant/ nal condition, and nestling condition. Postfledging survival was positively related to Award Number: G.0308.13N. group size, with fledglings raised in groups with four helpers showing nearly 30% higher survival until independence compared with pair- only offspring, independent of fledging date, maternal condition or nestling condition.
  • Bird Watching in Cyprus a Brief Guide for Visitors To

    Bird Watching in Cyprus a Brief Guide for Visitors To

    BIRD WATCHING IN CYPRUS A BRIEF GUIDE FOR VISITORS TO THE ISLAND 1 Information on Cyprus in general The position of Cyprus in the eastern Mediterranean with Turkey to the north, Syria to the east and Egypt to the south, places it on one of the major migration routes in the Mediterranean and makes it a stop off point for many species which pass each year from Europe/Asia to Africa via the Nile Delta. The birds that occur regularly on passage form a large percentage of the ‘Cyprus list’ that currently totals nearly 380 species. Of these only around 50 are resident and around 40 are migrant species that regularly or occasionally breed. The number of birds passing over during the spring and autumn migration periods are impressive, as literally millions of birds pour through Cyprus. Spring migration gets underway in earnest around the middle of March, usually depending on how settled the weather is, and continues into May. A few early arrivals can even be noted in February, especially the swallows, martins and swifts, some wheatears and the Great Spotted Cuckoo Clamator glandarius. Slender-billed Gulls Larus genei and herons can be seen in flocks along the coastline. Each week seems to provide a different species to watch for. The end of March sees Roller Coracias garrulous, Masked Shrike Lanius nubicus, Cretzschmar’s Bunting Emberiza caesia, Black-headed Wagtails Motacilla flava feldegg and Red-rumped Swallows Cecropsis daurica, while on the wetlands Marsh Sandpipers Tringa stagnatilis, Collared Pratincole Glareola pratincola, Spur-winged Vanellus spinosus and Greater Sand Plover Charadrius leschenaultii can be seen.
  • Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only

    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only

    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X
  • Parasitic Helminths and Arthropods of Fulvous Whistling-Ducks (Dendrocygna Bicolor) in Southern Florida

    Parasitic Helminths and Arthropods of Fulvous Whistling-Ducks (Dendrocygna Bicolor) in Southern Florida

    J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 61(1), 1994, pp. 84-88 Parasitic Helminths and Arthropods of Fulvous Whistling-Ducks (Dendrocygna bicolor) in Southern Florida DONALD J. FORRESTER,' JOHN M. KINSELLA,' JAMES W. MERTiNS,2 ROGER D. PRICE,3 AND RICHARD E. TuRNBULL4 5 1 Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, 2 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, P.O. Box 844, Ames, Iowa 50010, 1 Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, and 4 Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Okeechobee, Florida 34974 ABSTRACT: Thirty fulvous whistling-ducks (Dendrocygna bicolor) collected during 1984-1985 from the Ever- glades Agricultural Area of southern Florida were examined for parasites. Twenty-eight species were identified and included 8 trematodes, 6 cestodes, 1 nematode, 4 chewing lice, and 9 mites. All parasites except the 4 species of lice and 1 of the mites are new host records for fulvous whistling-ducks. None of the ducks were infected with blood parasites. Every duck was infected with at least 2 species of helminths (mean 4.2; range 2- 8 species). The most common helminths were the trematodes Echinostoma trivolvis and Typhlocoelum cucu- merinum and 2 undescribed cestodes of the genus Diorchis, which occurred in prevalences of 67, 63, 50, and 50%, respectively. Only 1 duck was free of parasitic arthropods; each of the other 29 ducks was infested with at least 3 species of arthropods (mean 5.3; range 3-9 species). The most common arthropods included an undescribed feather mite (Ingrassia sp.) and the chewing louse Holomenopon leucoxanthum, both of which occurred in 97% of the ducks.
  • Vickery Et Al. 2014, Cresswell 2014)

    Vickery Et Al. 2014, Cresswell 2014)

    1 Accepted Journal of Avian Biology 25/8/16 MS JAV-1119 R2 2 Cyprus Wheatears Oenanthe cypriaca likely reach sub-Saharan African wintering 3 grounds in a single migratory flight 4 5 Marina Xenophontos, Emma Blackburn & Will Cresswell* 6 Centre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews, Fife KY16 7 9TH, UK 8 9 *Correspondence author: [email protected] 10 11 1 12 Long-distance migratory flights with multiple stop-overs, multiple wintering sites, and small-scale 13 connectivity in Afro-Palearctic migrants are likely to increase their vulnerability to environmental change 14 and lead to declining populations. Here we present the migration tracks and wintering locations of the first 15 six Cyprus Wheatears to be tracked with geolocators: a species with high survival and a stable 16 population. We therefore predicted a non-stop flight from Cyprus to sub-Saharan wintering grounds, a 17 single wintering area for each individual and a wide spread of wintering locations representing low 18 migratory connectivity at the population level. The sub-Saharan wintering grounds in South Sudan, Sudan 19 and Ethiopia were likely reached by a single flight of an average straight-line distance of 2,538 km in ca. 20 60 hours, with an average minimum speed of 43.1 km/h. The high speed of migration probably ruled out 21 stop-overs greater than a few hours. Cyprus Wheatears migrated from Cyprus in mid-late October and 22 most probably remained at a single location throughout winter; three out of five birds with available data 23 may have used a second site <100 km away during February; all returned between the 7 – 22nd March 24 when accurate geolocation data are not possible due to the equinox.
  • ORL 5.1 Non-Passerines Final Draft01a.Xlsx

    ORL 5.1 Non-Passerines Final Draft01a.Xlsx

    The Ornithological Society of the Middle East, the Caucasus and Central Asia (OSME) The OSME Region List of Bird Taxa, Part A: Non-passerines. Version 5.1: July 2019 Non-passerine Scientific Families placed in revised sequence as per IOC9.2 are denoted by ֍֍ A fuller explanation is given in Explanation of the ORL, but briefly, Bright green shading of a row (eg Syrian Ostrich) indicates former presence of a taxon in the OSME Region. Light gold shading in column A indicates sequence change from the previous ORL issue. For taxa that have unproven and probably unlikely presence, see the Hypothetical List. Red font indicates added information since the previous ORL version or the Conservation Threat Status (Critically Endangered = CE, Endangered = E, Vulnerable = V and Data Deficient = DD only). Not all synonyms have been examined. Serial numbers (SN) are merely an administrative convenience and may change. Please do not cite them in any formal correspondence or papers. NB: Compass cardinals (eg N = north, SE = southeast) are used. Rows shaded thus and with yellow text denote summaries of problem taxon groups in which some closely-related taxa may be of indeterminate status or are being studied. Rows shaded thus and with yellow text indicate recent or data-driven major conservation concerns. Rows shaded thus and with white text contain additional explanatory information on problem taxon groups as and when necessary. English names shaded thus are taxa on BirdLife Tracking Database, http://seabirdtracking.org/mapper/index.php. Nos tracked are small. NB BirdLife still lump many seabird taxa. A broad dark orange line, as below, indicates the last taxon in a new or suggested species split, or where sspp are best considered separately.
  • Tanzania, 30 November to 21 December 2020

    Tanzania, 30 November to 21 December 2020

    Tanzania, 30 November to 21 December 2020 Thomas Pettersson This tour was organized by Tanzania Birding and Beyond Safaris and unfortunately, I was the only participant as my friend was prevented from going as was planned. The flights from Stockholm via Addis Ababa to Dar es Salaam and back with Ethiopian Airlines were uneventful. The only differences from my previous flights were that wearing face masks on the aircrafts was mandatory, and recommended at the airports, and that they checked my body temperature at both arrival and departure. I am not sure what the consequences would have been in case of fever. You must also complete a health declaration both for transfer and arrival. The outbound flight from Stockholm to Addis Ababa was about half empty and on the return perhaps only 25 % of the seats were occupied, which meant good nights sleep on three seats both ways. The flights between Addis Ababa and Dar es Salaam were fully booked both ways. The domestic flights with Coastal Aviation from Dar es Salaam via Zanzibar (Unguja) to Pemba and on to Tanga were also smooth, with the same regulations as above. The aircrafts were painfully small though, 12 seats. Not much space for legs and hand luggage. On the other hand, the distances are short. All in all, the tour was a big success. Accommodation was generally good, although basic at some places, but nothing to complain about. Food was excellent and plentiful, and I had no issues with the stomach. The drivers and the guides were excellent, in particular the outstanding Anthony, who guided most of the tour.