DOCSLIB.ORG

Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 A) Total in Grid Squares SP0172, SP0272, SP0273, SP0274, SP0275, SP0276, SP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 A) Total in Grid Squares SP0172, SP0272, SP0273, SP0274, SP0275, SP0276, SP Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 A) Total in grid squares SP0172, SP0272, SP0273, SP0274, SP0275, SP0276, SP0370, SP0371, SP0372, SP0374, SP0375, SP0376, SP0469, SP0470, SP0471, SP0472, SP0473, SP0474, SP0475, SP0476, SP0569, SP0570, SP0571, SP0572, SP0573, SP0574, SP0575 Barn Owl Green Sandpiper Pochard Barnacle Goose Green Woodpecker Red Kite Blackbird Greenfinch Redshank Blackcap Grey Heron Redwing Black-headed Gull Grey Wagtail Reed Bunting Blue Tit Greylag Goose Reed Warbler Bullfinch Herring Gull Ring Ouzel Buzzard Hobby Robin Canada Goose House Martin Rook Carrion Crow House Sparrow Sand Martin Caspian Gull Jackdaw Scaup Chaffinch Jay Sedge Warbler Chiffchaff Kestrel Shoveler Coal Tit Kingfisher Siskin Collared Dove Lapwing Skylark Common Gull Lesser Black-backed Gull Smew Common Sandpiper Lesser Redpoll Snipe Common Tern Lesser Whitethroat Song Thrush Coot Linnet Sparrowhawk Cormorant Little Egret Starling Cuckoo Little Grebe Stock Dove Curlew Little Owl Stonechat Dunnock Long-tailed Tit Swallow Feral Pigeon Magpie Swift Fieldfare Mallard Teal Gadwall Mandarin Treecreeper Garden Warbler Meadow Pipit Tufted Duck Goldcrest Mistle Thrush Turnstone Golden Plover Moorhen Wheatear Goldeneye Mute Swan Whitethroat Goldfinch Nuthatch Wigeon Goosander Osprey Willow Warbler Great Crested Grebe Oystercatcher Wood Pigeon Great Grey Shrike Peregrine Woodcock Great Northern Diver Pheasant Wren Great Spotted Woodpecker Pied Wagtail Yellowhammer Great Tit Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 B) Individual grid squares SP0172 SP0272 Barnacle Goose Blue Tit Black-headed Gull Buzzard Canada Goose Carrion Crow Grey Wagtail Chiffchaff Mandarin Long-tailed Tit Starling Magpie Mallard Nuthatch SP0273 Blackbird Great Grey Shrike Moorhen Black-headed Gull Great Tit Mute Swan Blue Tit Grey Heron Pochard Buzzard Herring Gull Redwing Canada Goose House Martin Robin Carrion Crow House Sparrow Rook Collared Dove Jackdaw Song Thrush Cormorant Jay Starling Coot Lesser Black-backed Gull Stock Dove Dunnock Lesser Redpoll Swallow Fieldfare Long-tailed Tit Tufted Duck Goldfinch Magpie Wood Pigeon Great Crested Grebe Mallard Wren Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 SP0274 Blackbird Great Tit Redwing Black-headed Gull Grey Heron Robin Blue Tit Grey Wagtail Scaup Buzzard Herring Gull Smew Carrion Crow Jackdaw Sparrowhawk Chaffinch Kestrel Starling Chiffchaff Lesser Black-backed Gull Stock Dove Dunnock Long-tailed Tit Wood Pigeon Fieldfare Magpie Wren Great Grey Shrike Meadow Pipit SP0275 Barnacle Goose Goldcrest Kestrel Blackbird Goldeneye Kingfisher Black-headed Gull Goldfinch Lapwing Blue Tit Goosander Lesser Black-backed Gull Bullfinch Great Crested Grebe Little Grebe Buzzard Great Northern Diver Long-tailed Tit Canada Goose Great Spotted Woodpecker Magpie Carrion Crow Great Tit Mallard Caspian Gull Green Sandpiper Mistle Thrush Chaffinch Green Woodpecker Moorhen Coal Tit Greenfinch Mute Swan Common Sandpiper Grey Heron Nuthatch Coot Grey Wagtail Osprey Cormorant Greylag Goose Pheasant Dunnock Herring Gull Pied Wagtail Fieldfare Jackdaw Pochard Gadwall Jay Redshank (Cont.) Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 SP0275 (cont.) Redwing Skylark Teal Reed Bunting Snipe Treecreeper Reed Warbler Song Thrush Tufted Duck Robin Sparrowhawk Turnstone Rook Starling Wigeon Sedge Warbler Stock Dove Wood Pigeon Shoveler Stonechat Wren Siskin Swallow SP0276 Red Kite SP0370 Great Tit Kestrel Red Kite SP0371 Barn Owl SP0372 Bullfinch Herring Gull Magpie Buzzard Jackdaw Rook Carrion Crow Kestrel Wood Pigeon Cormorant Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 SP0374 Barn Owl Chiffchaff Kestrel Buzzard Great Grey Shrike Magpie Carrion Crow Jackdaw Ring Ouzel SP0375 Great Grey Shrike SP0376 Blackbird Great Spotted Woodpecker Nuthatch Black-headed Gull Great Tit Pheasant Blue Tit Green Woodpecker Robin Buzzard Greenfinch Song Thrush Carrion Crow Grey Wagtail Starling Chaffinch Jackdaw Stock Dove Chiffchaff Jay Treecreeper Dunnock Kestrel Wood Pigeon Fieldfare Long-tailed Tit Woodcock Goldcrest Magpie Wren Goldfinch Mallard SP0469 SP0470 SP0471 Barn Owl None reported Lesser Whitethroat Kestrel Willow Warbler Kingfisher Sparrowhawk Starling Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 SP0472 SP0473 None reported Bullfinch Buzzard Coot Great Crested Grebe Kestrel SP0474 Black-headed Gull Great Grey Shrike Little Owl Blue Tit Grey Heron Robin Carrion Crow Jackdaw Rook Feral Pigeon Kestrel Song Thrush Fieldfare Lesser Black-backed Gull Wren SP0475 SP0476 Ring Ouzel None reported SP0569 Barnacle Goose Coal Tit Golden Plover Blackbird Collared Dove Goldfinch Blackcap Common Gull Goosander Black-headed Gull Common Tern Great Crested Grebe Blue Tit Coot Great Spotted Woodpecker Bullfinch Cormorant Great Tit Buzzard Curlew Green Sandpiper Canada Goose Dunnock Green Woodpecker Carrion Crow Fieldfare Greenfinch Chaffinch Garden Warbler Grey Heron Chiffchaff Goldcrest Greylag Goose (cont.) Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 SP0569 (cont.) Herring Gull Meadow Pipit Song Thrush House Martin Mistle Thrush Sparrowhawk House Sparrow Moorhen Starling Jackdaw Mute Swan Stock Dove Jay Nuthatch Swallow Kestrel Oystercatcher Swift Kingfisher Pheasant Treecreeper Lapwing Pied Wagtail Tufted Duck Lesser Black-backed Gull Redwing Wheatear Lesser Redpoll Reed Bunting Whitethroat Linnet Robin Wigeon Little Egret Rook Willow Warbler Little Grebe Sand Martin Wood Pigeon Long-tailed Tit Siskin Wren Magpie Skylark Yellowhammer Mallard Snipe SP0570 SP0571 None reported None reported SP0572 Blackbird Carrion Crow Dunnock Blackcap Chaffinch Feral Pigeon Black-headed Gull Chiffchaff Goldfinch Blue Tit Collared Dove Great Crested Grebe Bullfinch Common Tern Great Spotted Woodpecker Buzzard Coot Great Tit Canada Goose Cormorant Greenfinch (cont.) Bird Species Recorded in Alvechurch Parish 2010-2016 SP0572 (cont.) Grey Heron Moorhen Stock Dove House Martin Mute Swan Swallow House Sparrow Nuthatch Swift Kingfisher Peregrine Treecreeper Lapwing Pied Wagtail Tufted Duck Lesser Black-backed Gull Robin Whitethroat Magpie Sand Martin Wood Pigeon Mallard Song Thrush Wren SP0573 SP0574 SP0575 None reported Cuckoo None reported Hobby Reed Bunting .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 345 Fieldfare Put Your Logo Here
    Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 345 Fieldfare Fieldfare. Adult. Male (09-I). Song Thrush FIELDFARE (Turdus pilaris ) IDENTIFICATION 25-26 cm. Grey head; red-brown back; grey rump and dark tail; pale underparts; pale flanks spotted black; white underwing coverts; yellow bill with ochre tip. Redwing Fieldfare. Pattern of head, underwing co- verts and flank. SIMILAR SPECIES Song Thrush has orange underwing coverts; Redwing has reddish underwing coverts; Mistle Thrush has white underwing coverts, but lacks pale supercilium and its rump isn’t grey. Mistle Thrush http://blascozumeta.com Write your website here Page 1 Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 345 Fieldfare SEXING Male with dark or black tail feathers; red- dish feathers on back with blackish center; most have a broad mark on crown feathers. Female with dark brown tail feathers but not black; dull reddish feathers on back with dark centre (but not blackish); most have a thin mark on crown feathers. CAUTION: some birds of both sexes have similar pattern on crown feathers. Fieldfare. Sexing. Pattern of tail: left male; right fe- male. Fieldfare. Sexing. Pat- AGEING tern of Since this species doesn’t breed in Aragon, only crown feat- 2 age groups can be recognized: hers: top 1st year autumn/2nd year spring with moult male; bot- limit within moulted chestnut inner greater co- tom female. verts and retained juvenile outer greater coverts, shorter and duller with traces of white tips; pointed tail feathers.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is So Rare?
    WHAT IS SO RARE? As a Fieldfare in April? In Massachusetts, perhaps only a Western Reef Heron or a White-faced Ibis. April here is a month of avian surprises. The 1986 birdwatching spring was off to a happy start with the discovery by schoolteacher Ralph Richards, during a lonely vigil on the cold and rainy Sunday of April 6, of a Fieldfare Turdus pilaris) in a Concord cornfield near the Sudbury River. According ta a bulletin promptly issued by the Massachusetts Audubon Society, this is a first state record, and there have been, s-ince 1878, ten prior records in North America, the most recent being the occurrence of four Fieldfares in St. John's, Newfoundland, from December 1985 to mid-January 1986. "It seems not unlikely that the Massachusetts bird originated with the same midwinter flight that brought the Newfoundland birds to North America. ..." In winter, the Fieldfare ranges from southern Scandinavia, the British Isles, and central Europe south to the Mediterranean. Outside of the breeding season, the bird's habitat choice is open fields and pastures, where it occurs gregariously in large flocks, often accompanied by Redwings (Turdus iliacus). The Fieldfare nests in northern Scandinavia (it is Norway's most common thrush), in north and central continental Europe east to Siberia, and also in Iceland and southern Greenland. The story of the establishment of the disjunct Greenland population is well documented. In January 1937, a strong southeast gale swept a flock of Fieldfares across Europe and the Atlantic to the island of Jan Mayen and the Greenland coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Experimentally Simulated Presence of a Common Cuckoo (Cuculus Canorus) Affect Egg Rejection and Breeding Success in the Red‑Backed Shrike (Lanius Collurio)?
    acta ethologica (2021) 24:87–94 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-021-00362-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Does experimentally simulated presence of a common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) affect egg rejection and breeding success in the red‑backed shrike (Lanius collurio)? Piotr Tryjanowski1,2 · Artur Golawski3 · Mariusz Janowski1 · Tim H. Sparks1,4 Received: 23 September 2020 / Revised: 18 January 2021 / Accepted: 10 February 2021 / Published online: 8 March 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Providing artifcial eggs is a commonly used technique to understand brood parasitism, mainly by the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). However, the presence of a cuckoo egg in the host nest would also require an earlier physical presence of the common cuckoo within the host territory. During our study of the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio), we tested two experimental approaches: (1) providing an artifcial “cuckoo” egg in shrike nests and (2) additionally placing a stufed common cuckoo with a male call close to the shrike nest. We expected that the shrikes subject to the additional common cuckoo call stimuli would be more sensitive to brood parasitism and demonstrate a higher egg rejection rate. In the years 2017–2018, in two locations in Poland, a total of 130 red-backed shrike nests were divided into two categories: in 66 we added only an artifcial egg, and in the remaining 64 we added not only the egg, but also presented a stufed, calling common cuckoo. Shrikes reacted more strongly if the stufed common cuckoo was present. However, only 13 incidences of egg acceptance were noted, with no signifcant diferences between the locations, experimental treatments or their interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Business and Biodiversity Platform
    EU Business and Biodiversity Platform Workstream 2: Innovation for Biodiversity and Business Innovation for reed bed biomass fuel and biodiversity by FIELDFARE – ANALYSIS OF THE OPPORTUNITY October 2015 Author: Guy Duke Contributing author: Paul Goriup (FIELDFARE) 1 BASIC INFORMATION 1.1 Companies and contact points FIELDFARE Contact: Paul Goriup, Managing Director, FIELDFARE Email: [email protected] Web: www.fieldfare.biz 1.2 Summary of the opportunity An innovation offering significant benefit to small rural businesses in a particular region of the EU (lower Danube) and offering significant enhancement of reed bed biodiversity in this region as well as larger populations along flyways of migrants benefiting from these reed bed enhancements. It offers a financially sustainable solution to reducing the extent of overgrown reed beds and eventually reverse ecologically unsustainable floodplain management in the lower Danube region. Good scalability in the lower Danube region with possible transfer to other reed bed areas in Europe, limited by reed bed area. There is a potential €40+ million per annum market from the lower Danube resource, generating 2000-2500 jobs. Feasibility currently constrained by inflexible standards, slow rate of innovation in management and processing technologies, and low diffusion of appropriate boiler equipment. 1.3 Description of the innovation FIELDFARE harnesses ethical investment in Western Europe to promote ecologically sustainable development and wise use of natural resources in Eastern Europe. It is particularly active in the Danube Delta, a region of high biodiversity, where relatively modest investment can generate large biodiversity benefits. The main innovation is the production of biomass fuel from overgrown, low biodiversity reed beds that have become widespread as a result of floodplain modification since the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejection Behavior by Common Cuckoo Hosts Towards Artificial Brood Parasite Eggs
    REJECTION BEHAVIOR BY COMMON CUCKOO HOSTS TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL BROOD PARASITE EGGS ARNE MOKSNES, EIVIN ROSKAFT, AND ANDERS T. BRAA Departmentof Zoology,University of Trondheim,N-7055 Dragvoll,Norway ABSTRACT.--Westudied the rejectionbehavior shown by differentNorwegian cuckoo hosts towardsartificial CommonCuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs. The hostswith the largestbills were graspejectors, those with medium-sizedbills were mostlypuncture ejectors, while those with the smallestbills generally desertedtheir nestswhen parasitizedexperimentally with an artificial egg. There were a few exceptionsto this general rule. Becausethe Common Cuckooand Brown-headedCowbird (Molothrus ater) lay eggsthat aresimilar in shape,volume, and eggshellthickness, and they parasitizenests of similarly sizedhost species,we support the punctureresistance hypothesis proposed to explain the adaptivevalue (or evolution)of strengthin cowbirdeggs. The primary assumptionand predictionof this hypothesisare that somehosts have bills too small to graspparasitic eggs and thereforemust puncture-eject them,and that smallerhosts do notadopt ejection behavior because of the heavycost involved in puncture-ejectingthe thick-shelledparasitic egg. We comparedour resultswith thosefor North AmericanBrown-headed Cowbird hosts and we found a significantlyhigher propor- tion of rejectersamong CommonCuckoo hosts with graspindices (i.e. bill length x bill breadth)of <200 mm2. Cuckoo hosts ejected parasitic eggs rather than acceptthem as cowbird hostsdid. Amongthe CommonCuckoo hosts, the costof acceptinga parasiticegg probably alwaysexceeds that of rejectionbecause cuckoo nestlings typically eject all hosteggs or nestlingsshortly after they hatch.Received 25 February1990, accepted 23 October1990. THEEGGS of many brood parasiteshave thick- nestseither by grasping the eggs or by punc- er shells than the eggs of other bird speciesof turing the eggs before removal. Rohwer and similar size (Lack 1968,Spaw and Rohwer 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Trends of Common Birds in the Italian Alps
    Population Index of Common Breeding Birds in Italian Mountain Prairies Rural development: A critical opportunity for people and biodiversity With a spotlight on the Alpine region Turin 6 november 2013 Mountains cover almost a quarter of the Earth surface, host more than 16% of global human population but provide services to many more communities and people Mountains provide many kind of resources that have positive impacts on human health and its prosperity far beyond their natural boundaries. One for all, water The mountains contribute for the 16% to the Italian national GDP However, despite their importance, the conservation status of mountains is not so satisfactory and many problems exist. Some of these are related with human presence and activities, e.g. effects of climate change, pollution, settlement and infrastructures development and tourism pressure; others with the opposite phenomena e.g. changes in cultural landscape and decrease of open habitats, and their biodiversity, due to the land abandonment For these reasons, MITO2000 project (the Italian national common bird monitoring scheme) decided to focus on species breeding in mountain open habitats MITO2000 is part of PECBMS (Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme), a Europe-wide network of national breeding bird monitoring projects. This network produces indices of population trends of many breeding bird species. One of the most important index is the FBI (Farmland Bird Index), that is one of the EU indicators to assess the impact of agri- environment measures of the CAP These indices are “aggregated indices” because they are calculated averaging the population trends of some species, choosen on the basis of their shared ecological preferences Through objective procedures we identified a group of species breeding in mountain open habitats and, from 2009, we used them to build up a new aggregate index, named FBIpm ( Mountain Prairies Index) Some results .....
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Birds
    European Red List of Birds Compiled by BirdLife International Published by the European Commission. opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, Citation: Publications of the European Communities. Design and layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Pannónia Nyomda Picture credits on cover page: Fratercula arctica to continue into the future. © Ondrej Pelánek All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed Published by the European Commission. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN: 978-92-79-47450-7 DOI: 10.2779/975810 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Hungary. European Red List of Birds Consortium iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................1 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Mongolia Cumulative Bird List Column A
    China: Inner Mongolia Cumulative Bird List Column A: total number of days that the species was recorded in 2016 Column B: maximum daily count for that particular species Column C: H = Heard only; (H) = Heard more often than seen Globally threatened species as defined by BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-Rom Cambridge, U.K. BirdLife International are identified as follows: EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near- threatened. A B C Ruddy Shelduck 2 3 Tadorna ferruginea Mandarin Duck 1 10 Aix galericulata Gadwall 2 12 Anas strepera Falcated Teal 1 4 Anas falcata Eurasian Wigeon 1 2 Anas penelope Mallard 5 40 Anas platyrhynchos Eastern Spot-billed Duck 3 12 Anas zonorhyncha Eurasian Teal 2 12 Anas crecca Baer's Pochard EN 1 4 Aythya baeri Ferruginous Pochard NT 3 49 Aythya nyroca Tufted Duck 1 1 Aythya fuligula Common Goldeneye 2 7 Bucephala clangula Hazel Grouse 4 14 Tetrastes bonasia Daurian Partridge 1 5 Perdix dauurica Brown Eared Pheasant VU 2 15 Crossoptilon mantchuricum Common Pheasant 8 10 Phasianus colchicus Little Grebe 4 60 Tachybaptus ruficollis Great Crested Grebe 3 15 Podiceps cristatus Eurasian Bittern 3 1 Botaurus stellaris Yellow Bittern 1 1 H Ixobrychus sinensis Black-crowned Night Heron 3 2 Nycticorax nycticorax Chinese Pond Heron 1 1 Ardeola bacchus Grey Heron 3 5 Ardea cinerea Great Egret 1 1 Ardea alba Little Egret 2 8 Egretta garzetta Great Cormorant 1 20 Phalacrocorax carbo Western Osprey 2 1 Pandion haliaetus Black-winged Kite 2 1 Elanus caeruleus ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of Less Familiar Birds 106. Lesser Grey Shrike by I
    Studies of less familiar birds 106. Lesser Grey Shrike By I. J. Ferguson-Lees Photographs by Eric Hoskitig and K. Koffan (Plates 50-54) WHEN THE FIRST VOLUME of The Handbook was published in 1938, only 22 records of the Lesser Grey Shrike (Lanitts minor) in the British Isles were admitted and five of those cannot now be accepted. Only 17 Lesser Grey Shrikes in nearly a hundred years since the first was identified in 1842—yet from the autumn of 1952 to the spring of i960 at least 13 well-authenticated occurrences have taken place, a third of these being trapped and ringed. In 1958 two were recorded (Brit. Birds, 53: 171) and, although there was none in 19 5 9, there have already been two this year. This is yet another illustration of the way in which the greatly increased ranks of competent observers and ringers have shown birds formerly regarded as extremely rare vagrants to be of almost annual occurrence. In this country we tend to think of the Great Grey Shrike (L. excubitor) as a northern breeder which comes to us in winter, and of the Lesser Grey as a southern species. In fact, however, the former with its much vaster range extends considerably further south (as well as north), while the Lesser Grey nests or has nested in the east Baltic states and north-west Russia at 59°N, on the same latitude as Orkney. Its normal breeding range is from NE Spain (Costa Brava) and central and southern France eastwards through Germany, Czechoslovakia and Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet Composition and Prey Choice of the Southern Grey Shrike Lanius Meridionalis L
    ARDEOLA 53(2) 2aver 19/2/07 15:41 Página 237 Ardeola 53(2), 2006, 237-249 DIET COMPOSITION AND PREY CHOICE OF THE SOUTHERN GREY SHRIKE LANIUS MERIDIONALIS L. IN SOUTH-EASTERN SPAIN: THE IMPORTANCE OF VERTEBRATES IN THE DIET José A. HÓDAR* SUMMARY.—Diet composition and prey choice of the Southern grey shrike Lanius meridionalis L. in South-eastern Spain: the importance of vertebrates in the diet. Aims: The study of the diet and prey selection of the Southern grey shrike. Location: Two shrubsteppes of South-eastern Spain. Methods: The diet is determined by pellet analysis, and then compared with samples of prey availabil- ity recorded by means of pitfall traps, on a monthly basis during an annual cycle. Results: The Southern grey shrike consumes several beetle types, grasshoppers, and, during the breed- ing period, lizards. Birds and small mammals are captured incidentally. It consistently rejects prey small- er than 10 mm long, and prey are larger during the breeding period and summer. Compared with other populations of Southern grey shrike and also with Northern grey shrike, the population studied here shows a greater importance of lizards in the diet. Birds and mammals, which are progressively more frequent in diet as latitude increases, both in breeding and wintering periods, are here at low frequency. Conclusions: The diet of the Southern grey shrike in South Spain combines arthropods (mainly be- tween 10 and 30 mm in length) and lizards. The changes in the taxonomic groups captured along an an- nual cycle and their sizes suggest that, apart of the weak limits of prey size described, the Southern grey shrike is quite opportunistic when feeding, and captures any prey of the adequate size available, regard- less of their taxonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Global Decline in the True Shrikes (Family Laniidae)
    228 ShortCommunications and Commentaries [Auk, Vol. 111 The Auk 111(1):228-233, 1994 CONSERVATION COMMENTARY Evaluation of the Global Decline in the True Shrikes (Family Laniidae) REUVEN YOSEF t ArchboldBiological Station, P.O. Box2057, Lake Placid, Florida 33852, USA The first International Shrike Symposiumwas held Shrike was found in 1975, and of the Northern Shrike at the Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, Flor- in 1982. In Switzerland, these two specieshave offi- ida, from 11-15 January 1993. The symposium was cially been declared extinct. attended by 71 participants from 23 countries(45% In Sweden, Olsson (1993) and Carlson (1993) have North America, 32%Europe, 21% Asia, and 2% Africa). attributed the decline (over 50% between 1970 and The most exciting participation was that of a strong 1990) of the Red-backed Shrike to the destruction and contingent of ornithologists from eastern Europe. In deterioration of suitable habitats. Olsson (1993) ob- this commentary I present the points stressedat the served a large reduction of pastures in the last two Symposiumand illustrate them with severalexamples decades,and considers the Swedish law requiring as presentedby the authors. planting of unused pastures and fallow lands with The Symposiumwas convened to focus attention conifers as unfavorable for shrikes. He also stated that on, evaluate, and possibly recommend methods to nitrogenousand acid-rainpollutants have influenced reverse the worldwide decline of shrike populations. vegetationcomposition and insectpopulations, both Many of the 30 speciesare declining, or have become of which in turn have affected shrikes negatively. In extinct locally. Studies have focused mainly on the the Swedish Bird Population Monitoring Program, five speciesfound closestto placeswhere ornithol- the numbers of Red-backed Shrikes declined from a ogists live: Northern/Great Grey Shrike (Laniusex- high index of 100 in 1975, to a low of 60 in 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • Viscum Album L.) in Urban Areas (A Case Study of the Kaliningrad City, Russia)
    plants Article Ecological and Landscape Factors Affecting the Spread of European Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) in Urban Areas (A Case Study of the Kaliningrad City, Russia) Liubov Skrypnik 1,* , Pavel Maslennikov 1 , Pavel Feduraev 1 , Artem Pungin 1 and Nikolay Belov 2 1 Institute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Universitetskaya str., 2, Kaliningrad 236040, Russia; [email protected] (P.M.); [email protected] (P.F.); [email protected] (A.P.) 2 Institute of Environmental Management, Urban Development and Spatial Planning, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Zoologicheskaya str., 2, Kaliningrad 236022, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +74012533707 Received: 1 March 2020; Accepted: 19 March 2020; Published: 23 March 2020 Abstract: Green spaces are very important for an urban environment. Trees in cities develop under more stressful conditions and are, therefore, more susceptible to parasite including mistletoe infestation. The aim of this study was to investigate the ecological, microclimatic, and landscape factors causing the spread of European mistletoe (Viscum album L.) in urban conditions. The most numerous hosts of mistletoe were Tilia cordata (24.4%), Acer platanoides (22.7%), and Populus nigra (16.7%). On average, there were more than 10 mistletoe bushes per tree. The mass mistletoe infestations (more than 50 bushes per the tree) were detected for Populus berolinensis, Populus nigra, × and Acer saccharinum. The largest number of infected trees was detected in the green zone (city parks), historical housing estates, and green zone along water bodies. Based on the results of principal component analysis (PCA), the main factors causing the spread of mistletoe on the urban territories are trees’ age and relative air humidity.
    [Show full text]