DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Open Access LMU ASSESSMENT OF (COMPUTER-SUPPORTED) COLLABORATIVE LEARNING This is a post-print of an article submitted for consideration in the IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies © 2011 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Personal use of this manuscript is permitted. Permission from Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers must be obtained for any other commercial purpose. This article may not exactly replicate the published version, due to editorial changes and/or formatting and corrections during the final stage of publication. Interested readers are advised to consult the published version which can be found at: http://www.computer.org/csdl/trans/lt/2011/01/tlt2011010059-abs.html doi:{10.1109/TLT.2010.37} Please refer this manuscript as: Strijbos, J. W. (2011). Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies , 4, 59-73. 2 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, VOL. #, NO. #, MMMMMMMM 1996 Assessment of (Computer-Supported) Collaborative Learning J.W. Strijbos Abstract —Within the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CS)CL research community there has been an extensive dialogue on theories and perspectives on learning from collaboration, approaches to scaffold (script) the collaborative process, and most recently research methodology. In contrast, the issue of assessment of collaborative learning has received much less attention. This article discusses how assessment of collaborative learning has been addressed, provides a perspective on what could be assessed, and highlights limitations of current approaches. Since assessment of collaborative learning is a demanding experience for teachers and students alike, they require adequate computer-supported and intelligent tools for monitoring and assessment. A roadmap for the role and application of intelligent tools for assessment of (CS)CL is presented. Index Terms —Assessment, Collaborative learning, Computers and Education, Psychology —————————— —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION ollaborative learning (CL) is nowadays a common Assessment criteria, in turn, are shaped by the purpose C practice at all levels of education. Since the 1970s of assessment. Broadly two purposes are distinguished: small group dynamics have been intensively studied summative and formative [7], [8]. Summative assessment in education (for a detailed historial overview see [1]). (also referred to as ‘assessment of learning’) is Research in the 1980s focused initially on face-to-face decontextualised and individualistic, it is isolated from student-student interaction in primary education, but it the learning process, and it takes place only at the end of was soon extended to secondary and higher education. a course to judge how well a student performed. Rapid developments in computer-mediated Summative assessment focuses strongly on the cognitive communication in the late 1980s led to a new discipline in aspects of learning, often applies a single performance the 1990s now referred to as Computer-Supported score, and it is designed and conducted by the teacher. Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Formative assessment (also referred to as ‘assessment for The introduction of computers in collaborative learning’) is contextualised and aims to build a learning induced a shift in the behaviors being studied. comprehensive picture of learners’ characteristics. It is an Initially research focused on individual cognitive learning integral part of a learning process and takes place several gain (1970–1990), whereas the rise of computer times during a course rather than only at the end. technology stimulated a shift in studying how group Formative assessment focuses on cognitive, social, and process affects individual and group cognition (1990– motivational aspects of learning, often applies a multi- present). At present there are roughly two dominant foci method approach and it leads to a profile instead of a in (CS)CL research: (a) understanding (successful) CL single score. Although distinguishing both purposes can practices, and (b) determining effective conditions for be useful, it should be kept in mind that any assessment – (succesful) CL [2], [3]. when communicated to a student – involves the use of Although it is common knowledge that assessment can feedback information and whether the use of this strongly influence learning [4], interestingly assessment information is more summative or formative, is an issue of CL has thus far remained an implicit issue – despite of interpretation rather than one of absolutes [7], [9], [10]. several publications highlighting the diverse theoretical Alike any other individual learning context, key to the and methodological positions in (CS)CL [2], [5], [6]. In assessment of CL is the operationalisation of relevant CL essence, what are considered relevant CL outcomes outcomes, i.e ‘why and what to assess’. The next section governs their (a) operationalisation and (b) subsequent first reviews assessment in CL approaches developed in measurement. The assessment of CL is directly shaped by the 1970s and 1980s, followed by common approaches to what is measured; however, it is more than merely assessment of CL. Subsequently four metaphors on measurement because it also contains a statement on the learning in CL are discussed, and it concludes with three quality of the CL process or product in relation to major challenges for assessment of CL. The third section prespecified criteria. presents an alternative framework of (CS)CL that explicitly addresses these challenges. The final section ———————————————— will discuss the need to align CL and its assessment, the • J.W. Strijbos is with the Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden teacher’s role in assessment of CL, the students’ role, and University, the Netherlands, E-mail: [email protected]. how technology can offer them (intelligent) tools for monitoring and assessment of CL. Manuscript received (insert date of submission if desired). Please not e that all acknowledgments should be placed at the end of the paper, before the bibliography. xxxx-xxxx/0x/$xx.00 © 200x IEEE AUTHOR ET AL.: TITLE 3 2. WHY ASSESS AND WHAT TO ASSESS ? Cohen’s [19] seminal review reoriented CL research stressing the role of tasks and interaction over the ‘reward Presently CL researchers widely agree that it is crucial for versus goal interdependence’ debate. Nowadays, it is collaborative learning that all group members perform a agreed that individual accountability and positive fair share of the task and that problems arise when one or interdependence are both crucial preconditions for several group members do not [2], [3]. This lack of potential productive interaction in any CL approach [21]. individual effort is referred to as social loafing and free- Moreover, most current CL methods achieve individual riding. Social loafing is a tendency to reduce the accountability by other means than reward individual effort when working in a group, as compared interdependence, for example through the use of roles to the individual effort expended when working alone [22], [23]. [24], [25], rather than through assessment [11]. Free-riding exists when an individual does not bear (reward structures). a proportional amount of the CL process and yet s/he shares the benefits of the group [12]. Social loafing and 2.2 Common Approaches to Assessment of CL free-riding are two often voiced complaints regarding Although assessment of CL gained attention in the past unsatisfactory assessment of CL. decade in face-to-face [26], [27], [28] and online [29], [30], 2.1 Assessment and Accountability [31], [32], [33], [34] CL contexts, it is currently still (a) mostly summative, (b) designed and conducted by the Understanding the current CL assessment practices teacher, (c) consists of individual tasks (i.e., tests, quizzes, requires revisiting the theoretical origins of the essays, etc.), a group task with each student receiving the approaches developed in the 1970s and 1980s – at the same grade or a combination of group and individual time referred to as ‘cooperative learning’. Two basic CL tasks, and (d) nearly exclusively focused on cognitive principles were introduced early-on to ensure that all outcomes (achievement). Especially group grades and/or members contribute to the group: individual grading based on a mix of group and individual tasks can accountability [13] and positive (goal) interdependence be problematic in a practical as well as theoretical sense. [14]. With respect to assessment of CL Slavin’s [15], [16] Kagan [35] argues that group grades should never be original operationalisation of individual accountability is used, despite the appeal for grading efficiency, because: of particular interest. Slavin’s view emphasizes reward (a) they violate individual accountability and invite free- and goal structures under which students operate. More riding or that the most able group member conducts most importantly, it emphasizes that group rewards enhance (or all) of the work (‘sucker effect’; see [36], [37]), (b) an student learning only if group rewards are based on the individual student typically has little influence on group individual learning of all group members. In most of formation and due to the coincidental presence of high or Slavin’s CL methods (e.g., Student Teams Achievement low achieving students or a free-rider, a group grade Divisions (STAD), students take individual quizzes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distributed Cognition As the Basis for Adaptation and Homeostasis In
    DISTRIBUTEDCOGNITIONASTHEBASISFORADAPTATION ANDHOMEOSTASISINROBOTS james henry stovold Doctor of Philosophy University of York Computer Science July 2016 ABSTRACT Many researchers approach the problem of building autonomous systems by looking to biology for inspiration. This has given rise to a wide-range of artificial systems mimicking their biological counterparts—artificial neural networks, artificial endocrine systems, and artificial musculoskeletal systems are prime examples. While these systems are succinct and work well in isolation, they can become cumbersome and complicated when combined to perform more complex tasks. Autonomous behaviour is one such complex task. This thesis considers autonomy as the complex behaviour it is, and proposes a bottom-up approach to developing autonomous beha- viour from cognition. This consists of investigating how cognition can provide new approaches to the current limitations of swarm systems, and using this as the basis for one type of autonomous behaviour: artificial homeostasis. Distributed cognition, a form of emergent cognition, is most often described in terms of the immune system and social insects. By taking inspiration from distributed cognition, this thesis details the development of novel algorithms for cognitive decision-making and emergent identity in leaderless, homogenous swarms. Artificial homeostasis is provided to a robot through an architecture that combines the cognitive decision-making algorithm with a simple associative memory. This architecture is used to demonstrate how a simple architecture can endow a robot with the capacity to adapt to an unseen environment, and use that information to proactively seek out what it needs from the environment in order to maintain its internal state. iii CONTENTS Abstract iii Table of Contents v List of Figures viii List of Tables xi List of Code Listings xii Acknowledgements xiii Declaration xv 1 introduction 1 1.1 Motivation .
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of a Flipped Classroom Design on Student Performance and Engagement in a First-Year Undergraduate Economics Classroom
    education sciences Article “A Little Flip Goes a Long Way”—The Impact of a Flipped Classroom Design on Student Performance and Engagement in a First-Year Undergraduate Economics Classroom Nadia Singh Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK; [email protected] Received: 7 October 2020; Accepted: 3 November 2020; Published: 4 November 2020 Abstract: The flipped classroom is gaining prominence as an active learning pedagogy to engage a new generation of students. However, all courses do not lend themselves to a fully flipped design and instructors are often reluctant to flip lectures due to the additional time and effort involved, especially so in case of technical subjects such as economics. This study experiments with a flipped classroom design in a first-year undergraduate economics course. The research was motivated by the fact that many undergraduate economics students do not engage with traditional lectures. They fail to acquire critical thinking, data handling and reasoning skills, which are thought to be at the core of the economics curriculum. In this flipped classroom format, traditional lectures were substituted with micro-lectures and the remaining class time was devoted to active learning pedagogies including quizzes, group work and student presentations. The full lectures were panopto recorded and put up on the e-learning site, Blackboard. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the flipped classroom format, I compared the final exam scores of students in the flipped classroom with those in the control group, which followed a traditional lecture-based approach. The key results from the analysis revealed that students in the flipped classroom performed better in the final exams vis-à-vis students in the traditional classroom format.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnographies of Science Education: Situated Practices of Science Learning for Social/Political Transformation
    Ethnographies of science education: situated practices of science learning for social/political transformation By: Carol B. Brandt, Heidi Carlone Brandt, C. & Carlone, H.B. (2012). Ethnographies of science education: Situated practices of science learning for social/political transformation. Ethnography and Education, 7(2), 143-150. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Ethnography and Education on 18 Jul 2012, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17457823.2012.693690. ***© Taylor & Francis. Reprinted with permission. No further reproduction is authorized without written permission from Taylor & Francis. This version of the document is not the version of record. Figures and/or pictures may be missing from this format of the document. *** Abstract: This article is an introductory essay to the Ethnography and Education special issue Ethnographies of science education: situated practices of science learning for social/political transformation. Keywords: Science Education | Ethnography | Culture Article: Transforming science education has been cited as a global imperative in terms of: producing technological innovation to maintain economic security (Bybee and Fuchs 2006; Tytler 2007); creating critical consumers of scientific knowledge (Osborne and Dillon2008) and fostering a more environmentally sustainable and equitable world (Calabrese Barton 2001; Carter 2008). In light of these agendas, viewing science as a cultural process has significantly contributed to our understanding
    [Show full text]
  • Mediated Peer (To Peer) Learning
    Mediated peer (to peer) learning Ulf Blomqvist TRITA-CSC-A 2006 : 9 ISSN 1653-5723 ISRN KTH/CSC/A--06/09--SE ISBN 91-7178-384-9 © Ulf Blomqvist, May 2006 Thesis for the degree of Licentiate of Technology, to be presented with due permission for public examination and criticism in the Lounge (Salongen) KTHB, Osquars Backe 31, at the Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, on 9 June 2006, at 10.00 am. Opponent: Dr. Jonas Gustafsson – Lärarhögskolan, Stockholm Abstract Peer learning means learning from and with each other. Collaboration and co- operation in a friendly environment is, however, something that is neither easy nor obvious for students attending the university. Though, different methods and technological solutions can be implemented to facilitate and improve peer learning as well as dialogue and reflection. The aims of this thesis were to study the implementation and use of inno- vative methods and technologies, and its effects on the learning process in mediated peer learning in higher education, as well as methods for facilitating peer learning through students’ individual and group reflection. The aim was also to study end-user involvements in the development processes. Dialogue sheets as a medium, i.e. a large sheet of paper with questions (about learning and reflection in this case) printed around its perimeter as support and guidance to the dialogue, have been investigated. Furthermore, the use of peer-to-peer (P2P) technology as mediator in learning has also been studied. The use of P2P technology in learning can be encapsulated in the expression peer-to-peer learning, hence the title “Mediated peer (to peer) learning”.
    [Show full text]
  • Flipped Classroom and Academic Performance 1
    FLIPPED CLASSROOM AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE 1 ACTION RESEARCH IN EDUCATION : EFFECTIVENESS OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS Mrs Aparna Vinay Date : 27th August 2020 FLIPPED CLASSROOM AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE 2 ABSTRACT This study is an action research in the field of education. In this research paper I have tried to gauge the effectiveness of flipped classroom as a strategy to improve the academic performance of students. The present study involved a sample of 14 AS and A level (CAIE curriculum) psychology students from an International School in Mumbai. Active learning strategy of flipped classroom was used to foster teaching and learning process among students. The data collection was done using self-report, observation and objective assessment. The results supported the effectiveness of flipped classroom on academic performance. The strategy helped improve the grades of students who were at the lower end of academic performance. KEY WORDS Flipped Classroom, academic performance,CAIE Cirriculum FLIPPED CLASSROOM AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE 3 INTRODUCTION The field of education has transformed in the past couple of decades. There are many innovations that have crept in. From active learning strategies which focus on a participative approach in teaching, to virtual classrooms that have brought schools into our homes, we have it all. The focus has changed from content to concept. The demographics of education have changed and so has its purpose. The academic performance still remains an important criterion of determining success in one’s educational life. However, in the present time the importance of skill building and easing the transfer of learning to workplace has also found a place in discussion of academics.
    [Show full text]
  • GB-Human Computation Handbook
    From Human Computation to the Global Brain: the self-organization of distributed intelligence Francis Heylighen Global Brain Institute Vrije Universiteit Brussel Introduction The present chapter wishes to investigate the wider context of human computation, viewing it as merely one approach within the broad domain of distributed human-computer symbiosis. The multifarious developments in the “social” Internet have shown the great potential of large-scale col- laborative systems that involve both people and the various information and communication technologies (ICT) that process, store and distribute data. Here, I wish to explore this development in the broadest sense, as the self-organization of a distributed intelligence system at the planetary level—a phenomenon that has been called the “global brain”. To get there, I will first define and illustrate the fundamental concept of distributed intelligence. Then I will review how such an intelligent net- work emerges and grows through a combination of self-organization and design. Finally, I will sketch some potential applications of the anticipated global brain. Human-computer complementarity The rationale for human computation is that people have certain intrinsic skills that are difficult to reproduce in computer programs. A computation system that requires those skills must therefore include people as informa- tion-processing agents. Thus, in human computation, people and comput- ers are supposed to work together synergetically, the one complementing the other. The reason for this complementarity lies in the fact that humans and com- puters process information in very different ways. Computers excel at ac- curately storing and retrieving discrete items, such as numbers or strings of characters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences Edited by R
    Cambridge University Press 0521845548 - The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences Edited by R. Keith Sawyer Frontmatter More information The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences Learning sciences is an interdisciplinary field that studies teaching and learning. The sciences of learning include cognitive science, educational psychology, computer sci- ence, anthropology, sociology, neuroscience, and other fields. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences shows how educators can use the learning sciences to design more effective learning environments, including school classrooms and informal settings such as science centers or after-school clubs, online distance learning, and computer- based tutoring software. The chapters in this handbook describe exciting new classroom environments, based on the latest science about how children learn. CHLS is a true handbook: readers can use it to design the schools of the future – schools that will prepare graduates to participate in a global society that is increasingly based on knowledge and innovation. R. Keith Sawyer is Associate Professor of Education at Washington University in St. Louis. He received his Ph.D. in Psychology at the University of Chicago and his S.B. in Computer Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He studies cre- ativity, collaboration, and learning. Dr. Sawyer has written or edited eight books. His most recent book is Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (2006). © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521845548 - The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences Edited by R. Keith Sawyer Frontmatter More information The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences Edited by R. Keith Sawyer Washington University © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521845548 - The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences Edited by R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Learning Sciences: the Very Idea Liam Rourkea* and Norm Friesenb Ananyang Technological University, Singapore; Bsimon Fraser University, Canada
    Educational Media International, Vol. 43, No. 4, December 2006, pp. 271–284 The learning sciences: the very idea Liam Rourkea* and Norm Friesenb aNanyang Technological University, Singapore; bSimon Fraser University, Canada TaylorREMI_A_192539.sgm10.1080/09523980600926226Educational0952-3987Original2006434000000DecemberLiamRourkeliam.rourke@gmail.com and& Article Francis (print)/1469-5790Francis Media 2006 LtdInternational (online) Attempts to frame the study of teaching and learning in explicitly scientific terms are not new, but they have been growing in prominence. Journals, conferences, and centres of learning science are appearing with remarkable frequency. However, in most of these invocations of an educational science, science itself is understood largely in progressivist, positivistic terms. More recent theory, sociology, and everyday practice of science are ignored in favour of appeals to apparently idealized scientific rigour and efficiency. We begin this article by considering a number of examples of prominent scholarship undermining this idealization. We then argue that learning and education are inescapably interpretive activities that can only be configured rhetorically rather than substantially as science. We conclude by arguing for the relevance of a broader and self-consciously rhetorical/metaphorical conception of science, one that would include the possibility of an interpretive human science. Science et apprentissage: l’idée elle-même Les tentatives visant à enchâsser l’étude de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage dans des termes explicitement scientifiques, ne sont pas nouvelles mais elles sont de plus en plus marquées. Des revues, des conférences et des centres de science de l’apprentissage apparaissent de plus en plus fréquemment. Dans la plupart de ces invoca- tions à une science éducative le mot science est toutefois pris dans un sens largement positiviste et progressiste.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating Change Through Peer Teaching
    Journal of Agricultural Education Volume 52, Number 1, pp. 40–49 DOI: 10.5032/jae.2011.01040 Cultivating Change Through Peer Teaching Jonathan J. Velez, Assistant Professor Oregon State University Jamie Cano, Associate Professor The Ohio State University M. Susie Whittington, Associate Professor The Ohio State University Kattlyn J. Wolf, Assistant Professor University of Idaho The purpose of this qualitative research study was to describe the impact of peer teaching on both the students and the classroom environment. Students, enrolled in two Introduction to Teaching courses in agricultural and extension education, were asked to engage in peer teaching activities. The researchers utilized discourse analysis, textual analysis, individual interviews, and focus group interviews to gather data addressing the research objectives. Overall, participants enjoyed both peer teaching and being taught by peers. The peer teaching environment facilitated student interaction which allowed students to assume the role of active participants. Students laughed, talked, and interacted throughout the lessons, creating a warm and inclusive atmosphere. Specifically, students that engaged in peer teaching displayed elements of metacognition, self-reflection, and career formation, coupled with a classroom environment free from the typical instructional and relational constraints associated with instructor/learner interaction. Keywords: peer teaching, instructional techniques, learner centered instruction, active learning Introduction teaching encourages students to assume a more active role in knowledge acquisition (De Lisi, The engagement of students in the learning 2002; Topping, 2005; Wadoodi & Crosby, process is an important component in successful 2002). De Lisi believed that educational university classrooms. All too often, students practices, including peer learning and peer enter a classroom, take a seat, listen to a lecture interaction, “…should be systematically and leave without engaging in higher order examined and evaluated” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace
    Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series Sean P. Goggins Isa Jahnke Volker Wulf Editors Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace CSCL@Work Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING SERIES Series Editors: Christopher Hoadley, New York University, New York, USA Naomi Miyake, Chukyo University, Aichi, Japan Editorial Board: Michael Baker, CNRS & Université Lumière Lyon, France Carl Bereiter, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Canada Yrjö Engeström, University of Helsinki, Finland Gerhard Fischer, University of Colorado, U.S.A. H. Ulrich Hoppe, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany Timothy Koschmann, Southern Illinois University, U.S.A. Claire O’Malley, University of Nottingham, U.K. Roy Pea, SRI International, U.S.A. Clotilde Pontecorovo, University ‘La Sapienza’, Italy Jeremy Roschelle, SRI International, U.S.A. Daniel Suthers, University of Hawaii, U.S.A. The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Book Series is for people working in the CSCL fi eld. The scope of the series extends to ‘collaborative learning’ in its broadest sense; the term is used for situations ranging from two individuals performing a task together, during a short period of time, to groups of 200 students following the same course and interacting via electronic mail. This variety also concerns the computational tools used in learning: elaborated graphical whiteboards support peer interaction, while more rudimentary textbased discussion forums are used for large group interaction. The series will integrate issues related to CSCL such as collaborative problem solving, collaborative learning without computers, negotiation patterns outside collaborative tasks, and many other relevant topics. It will also cover computational issues such as models, algorithms or architectures which support innovative functions relevant to CSCL systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Embodied Mind, Situated Cognition, and Expressive Microtiming In
    http://cnmat.berkeley.edu/publications/embodied-mind-situated-cognition-and-expressive-microtiming-african- american-music Embodied Mind, Situated Cognition, and Expressive Microtiming in African-American Music Author(s): Vijay Iyer Source: Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Spring 2002), pp. 387-414 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.387 Accessed: 30-03-2017 21:59 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal This content downloaded from 162.233.200.40 on Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:59:20 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Music Perception © 2002 BY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Spring 2002, Vol. 19, No. 3, 387–414 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Embodied Mind, Situated Cognition, and Expressive Microtiming in African-American Music V I J AY I Y E R New York City The dual theories of embodied mind and situated cognition, in which physical/temporal embodiment and physical/social/cultural environment contribute crucially to the structure of mind, are brought to bear on issues in music perception.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines
    Human Enhancement and Technologies Our Merger with Machines Human • Woodrow Barfield and Blodgett-Ford Sayoko Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines Edited by Woodrow Barfield and Sayoko Blodgett-Ford Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Philosophies www.mdpi.com/journal/philosophies Human Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines Human Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines Editors Woodrow Barfield Sayoko Blodgett-Ford MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editors Woodrow Barfield Sayoko Blodgett-Ford Visiting Professor, University of Turin Boston College Law School Affiliate, Whitaker Institute, NUI, Galway USA Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/philosophies/special issues/human enhancement technologies). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Volume Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-0365-0904-4 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-0365-0905-1 (PDF) Cover image courtesy of N. M. Ford. © 2021 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND.
    [Show full text]