DOCSLIB.ORG

Sorting and Provenance Patterns in the Usumacinta-Grijalva Delta, Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sorting and Provenance Patterns in the Usumacinta-Grijalva Delta, Mexico Sorting and provenance patterns in the Usumacinta‐Grijalva delta, Mexico ______________________________________________________ Master Thesis Earth Sciences T.G.Winkels Student number: 3245799 Utrecht University Faculty of Geosciences Department Physical Geography Supervisor: W.Z. Hoek / C.A.M. Nooren Sorting and provenance patterns in the Usumacinta‐Grijalva delta, Mexico Abstract The Usumacinta‐Grijalva delta is located in southern Mexico and is characterized by the largest beach ridge plain in the world, with well over 500 consecutive beach ridges spanning roughly the last 5000 years. This beach ridge plain has the potential to be used as a high resolution paleo‐environmental record since a sequence of beach ridges can be regarded as a time‐series for coastal evolution. During the 2013 field campaign samples were taken from 70 different coring locations in a series of transects and additional corings covering the delta plain. For a selection (>200) of samples grain‐size parameters were determined according to two different methods: sieving and laser‐diffraction particle size analysis, while magnetic susceptibility was determined for all samples. End member modeling was performed on both grain size datasets, in order to unmix and quantify the relative abundance of different sediment populations. Based on provenance and sorting processes, a physical meaning has been assigned to each specific sediment population (end‐member). Based on these labels, the contribution of the different river systems and coastal sorting processes, that play a role in the coastal evolution of the Usumacinta‐Grijalva delta, were reconstructed. Using LIDAR images and sediment characteristics, five different phases of delta evolution could be identified. Keywords Beach ridges Grain size analysis Magnetic Susceptibility End‐members ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 T.G. Winkels Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Department Physical Geography Sorting and provenance patterns in the Usumacinta‐Grijalva delta, Mexico Contents List of figures ............................................................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Aim of research ...................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Thesis Outline......................................................................................................... 9 2. Previous Research .......................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Beach Ridges ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Heavy minerals .................................................................................................... 12 2.2.1 Hydrodynamic processes ....................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Sediment Provenance .......................................................................................... 12 2.2.3 Post‐depositional processes ................................................................................ 13 3. Regional setting .............................................................................................................. 14 3.1 Climate setting ..................................................................................................... 14 3.2 Geological setting ................................................................................................ 16 3.3 Fluvial systems ..................................................................................................... 16 3.4 Coastal setting ..................................................................................................... 17 3.5 Anthropogenic impact ......................................................................................... 17 4. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Coring ................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 Ground penetrating radar (GPR) ......................................................................... 18 4.3 Grain size ............................................................................................................. 18 4.3.1 Sieving analysis .................................................................................................... 18 4.3.2 Laser‐diffraction analysis ..................................................................................... 20 4.3.3 Grain‐size statistics .............................................................................................. 20 4.4 End‐Member Modeling ........................................................................................ 21 4.5 Heavy Minerals .................................................................................................... 22 4.6 Magnetic Susceptibility ........................................................................................ 23 4.7 Chronology ........................................................................................................... 23 4.7.1 Optical Stimulated Luminescence dating ............................................................ 23 4.7.2 Radiocarbon dating ............................................................................................. 24 5. Results ............................................................................................................................. 25 5.1 Internal structure ................................................................................................. 25 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 T.G. Winkels Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Department Physical Geography Sorting and provenance patterns in the Usumacinta‐Grijalva delta, Mexico 5.2 Sediments anlysis ................................................................................................. 25 5.3 Sedimentary Zone classification .......................................................................... 27 5.3 End‐Member Modeling ........................................................................................ 31 5.4.1 Choosing number of end‐members ..................................................................... 31 5.4.2 End‐member characteristics ................................................................................ 31 5.4.3 End‐member abundances .................................................................................... 33 5.5 Depth variations end‐members ........................................................................... 35 5.6 Heavy minerals ................................................................................................... 37 5.6.1 Heavy mineral percentages ................................................................................. 37 5.6.2 Heavy mineral determination .............................................................................. 37 5.4.3 Heavy mineral comparison .................................................................................. 39 5.7 End‐member labels ............................................................................................. 40 5.8 Sorting processes ................................................................................................ 40 5.7 Age models .......................................................................................................... 41 6. Paleogeographic evolution of the Usumacinta‐Grijalva delta........................................ 43 7. Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 45 8. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 48 9. Recommended future research ...................................................................................... 49 10. Reference list ................................................................................................................. 50 Appendix 1 Coastal Settings ................................................................................................... 53 Appendix 2 GPR Measurements ............................................................................................. 54 Appendix 3 Sieving Analysis ................................................................................................... 55 Appendix 4 End‐Member correction ...................................................................................... 56 Appendix 5 Sea level correction ............................................................................................. 57 Appendix 6 Chronology .......................................................................................................... 58 Appendix 7 Sedimentary Zone classification 1 ................................................................... 59 Appendix 7 Sedimentary Zone classification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Association of Forest Communities of Petén, Guatemala: Context, Accomplishments and Challenges
    Association of Forest Communities of Petén, Guatemala Context, Accomplishments and Challenges Ileana Gómez and V. Ernesto Méndez Association of Forest Communities of Petén, Guatemala Context, Accomplishments and Challenges Ileana Gómez and V. Ernesto Méndez ISBN 978-979-24-4699-9 41p. First edition by PRISMA, 2005 Second edition by CIFOR and PRISMA, 2007 Design and layout by Cyprianus Jaya Napiun Photos by PRISMA Published by Center for International Forestry Research Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang Bogor Barat 16680, Indonesia Tel.: +62 (251) 622622; Fax: +62 (251) 622100 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.cifor.cgiar.org Methodology and Acknowledgements This publication is a collaborative effort by PRISMA in the project “Learning to Build Accompaniment Models for Grassroots Forestry Organizations in Brazil and Central America,” sponsored by the Ford Foundation and executed jointly by the Center for International Forest Research (CIFOR) and the Asociación Coordinadora Indígena Campesina de Agroforestería Comunitaria Centroamericana (ACICAFOC). The context analysis of the Asociación de Comunidades Forestales de Petén (ACOFOP) combined a literature review of secondary sources with field work in Petén (March and October 2004). This included participation in workshops for community leaders and self-systematizers, and interviews with Erick Cuellar of the ACOFOP technical team, Richard Grant and Aldo Rodas of Alianza para un Mundo Justo, Luis Romero of the Centro Maya and Héctor Rosado, Director of the National Council for Protected Areas (CONAP) in Petén. The paper was enriched by information provided at international workshops and exchange visits held in San Salvador (May 2004, methodological workshop) and Petén (October 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Takeshi Inomata Address Positions
    Inomata, Takeshi - page 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Takeshi Inomata Address School of Anthropology, University of Arizona 1009 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030 Phone: (520) 621-2961 Fax: (520) 621-2088 E-mail: [email protected] Positions Professor in Anthropology University of Arizona (2009-) Agnese Nelms Haury Chair in Environment and Social Justice University of Arizona (2014-2019) (Selected as one of the four chairs university-wide, that were created with a major donation). Associate Professor in Anthropology University of Arizona (2002-2009) Assistant Professor in Anthropology University of Arizona (2000-2002) Assistant Professor in Anthropology Yale University (1995-2000) Education Ph.D. Anthropology, Vanderbilt University (1995). Dissertation: Archaeological Investigations at the Fortified Center of Aguateca, El Petén, Guatemala: Implications for the Study of the Classic Maya Collapse. M.A. Cultural Anthropology, University of Tokyo (1988). Thesis: Spatial Analysis of Late Classic Maya Society: A Case Study of La Entrada, Honduras. B.A. Archaeology, University of Tokyo (1986). Thesis: Prehispanic Settlement Patterns in the La Entrada region, Departments of Copán and Santa Bárbara, Honduras (in Japanese). Major Fields of Interest Archaeology of Mesoamerica (particularly Maya) Politics and ideology, human-environment interaction, household archaeology, architectural analysis, performance, settlement and landscape, subsistence, warfare, social effects of climate change, LiDAR and remote sensing, ceramic studies, radiocarbon dating, and Bayesian analysis. Inomata, Takeshi - page 2 Extramural Grants - National Science Foundation, research grant, “Preceramic to Preclassic Transition in the Maya Lowlands: 1100 BC Burials from Ceibal, Guatemala,” (Takeshi Inomata, PI; Daniela Triadan, Co-PI, BCS-1950988) $298,098 (2020/6/3-8/31/2024).
    [Show full text]
  • Damming the Usumacinta: the Archaeological Impact
    Damming the Usumacinta: The Archaeological Impact S. JEFFREY K. WILKERSON INSTITUTE FOR CULTURAL ECOLOGY OF THE TROPICS n 1983, I addressed the Fifth Mesa Redonda con- larly on the Tabasco Plain, and the exploitation of the cerning the alarming news of a massive dam project resources of the isolated region upstream from the San Ito be undertaken on the Usumacinta River. Since lose Canvon increased. It soon became necessarv to de- the meeting, much has transpired and many more details fine the extremely vague border between ~uatekalaand of this immense hydroelectric project have been con- Mexico. After much dispute, the present river boundary firmed.' As a result we can now more accurately exam- following first the Usumacinta proper, and then its main ine the major factors that have an impact upon the tributary, the Chixoy or Salinas, was ratified at the very ample archaeological patrimony of the region. end of the century.4 This brief presentation concentrates upon six aspects: During this same period, archaeological discoveries (1) a general background of the threatened region; (2) were constant and many of the major Maya cities we are the basic facts about the proposed dams; (3) a prelimi- aware of today were recorded. The more accessible river- nary appraisal of the archaeological risk; (4) the current bank sites such as Yaxchiliin and Piedras Negras attracted status of the dams; (5) a review of the archaeological in- particular attention (Charnay 1885; Maudslay 1889; put into the decision-making process; and (6) some sug- Maler 1901). gestions of what we, as concerned scientists and indi- The first half of the twentieth centurv was a time of viduals, can do about this situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation for Maya Cultural and Natural Heritage
    Our mission is to coordinate efforts Foundation for Maya Cultural and provide resources to identify, and Natural Heritage lead, and promote projects that protect and maintain the cultural Fundación Patrimonio Cultural y Natural Maya and natural heritage of Guatemala. 2 # nombre de sección “What is in play is immense” HSH Prince Albert II of Monaco he Maya Biosphere Reserve is located in the heart of the Selva Maya, the Maya Jungle. It is an ecological treasure that covers one fifth of Guatemala’s landmass (21,602 Tsquare kilometers). Much of the area remains intact. It was established to preserve—for present and future generations— one of the most spectacular areas of natural and cultural heritage in the world. The Maya Biosphere Reserve is Guatemala’s last stronghold for large-bodied, wide-ranging endangered species, including the jaguar, puma, tapir, and black howler monkey. It also holds the highest concentration of Maya ruins. Clockwise from bottomleft José Pivaral (President of Pacunam), Prince Albert II of Monaco (sponsor), Mel Gibson (sponsor), Richard Hansen (Director of Mirador The year 2012 marks the emblematic change of an era in the ancient calendar of the Maya. This Archaeological Project) at El Mirador momentous event has sparked global interest in environmental and cultural issues in Guatemala. After decades of hard work by archaeologists, environmentalists, biologists, epigraphers, and other scientists dedicated to understanding the ancient Maya civilization, the eyes of the whole Pacunam Overview and Objectives 2 world are now focused on our country. Maya Biosphere Reserve 4 This provides us with an unprecedented opportunity to share with the world our pressing cause: Why is it important? the Maya Biosphere Reserve is in great danger.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Precision Radiocarbon Dating of Political Collapse and Dynastic Origins at the Maya Site of Ceibal, Guatemala
    High-precision radiocarbon dating of political collapse and dynastic origins at the Maya site of Ceibal, Guatemala Takeshi Inomata (猪俣 健)a,1, Daniela Triadana, Jessica MacLellana, Melissa Burhama, Kazuo Aoyama (青山 和夫)b, Juan Manuel Palomoa, Hitoshi Yonenobu (米延 仁志)c, Flory Pinzónd, and Hiroo Nasu (那須 浩郎)e aSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030; bFaculty of Humanities, Ibaraki University, Mito, 310-8512, Japan; cGraduate School of Education, Naruto University of Education, Naruto, 772-8502, Japan; dCeibal-Petexbatun Archaeological Project, Guatemala City, 01005, Guatemala; and eSchool of Advanced Sciences, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, 240-0193, Japan Edited by Jeremy A. Sabloff, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, and approved December 19, 2016 (received for review October 30, 2016) The lowland Maya site of Ceibal, Guatemala, had a long history of resolution chronology may reveal a sequence of rapid transformations occupation, spanning from the Middle Preclassic period through that are comprised within what appears to be a slow, gradual transi- the Terminal Classic (1000 BC to AD 950). The Ceibal-Petexbatun tion. Such a detailed understanding can provide critical insights into Archaeological Project has been conducting archaeological inves- the nature of the social changes. Our intensive archaeological inves- tigations at this site since 2005 and has obtained 154 radiocarbon tigations at the center of Ceibal, Guatemala, have produced 154 ra- dates, which represent the largest collection of radiocarbon assays diocarbon dates, which represent the largest set of radiocarbon assays from a single Maya site. The Bayesian analysis of these dates, ever collected at a Maya site.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Andrew K
    CURRICULUM VITAE Andrew K. Scherer CONTACT INFORMATION Address: Box 1921, Department of Anthropology, Brown University Providence, RI 02912 Phone: (401) 863-7059 E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION Graduate Studies at Texas A&M University Degree: Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology; December 2004 Dissertation: Dental Analysis of Classic Period Population Variability in the Maya Area Undergraduate Studies at Hamline University. Degree: Bachelor of Arts with Honors in Anthropology, Summa Cum Laude; May 1998 Major: Anthropology Minors: American Indian Studies, Geology, and Religious Studies RESEARCH GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS (Principal Investigator or Co-Principal Investigator) 2021 Faculty Fellowship, Cogut Institute for the Humanities at Brown University. 2021 Fulbright Canada Research Chair in Indigenist Resiliencies at McMaster University (declined). 2020 National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant (Co-PI: Harper Dine), Archaeology Program (BCS- 2054097), $13,555. 2019 National Geographic Society's Committee for Research and Exploration (NGS-60224R- 19), $30,000. 2019 National Science Foundation Senior Research Grant, Archaeology Program (BCS- 1917671), $234,320. 2019 National Science Foundation Senior Research Grant, Archaeology Program (BCS- 1849921), $263,353 2019 Brown University OVPR Salomon Faculty Research Award, $15,000 2017 Mellon Decade Fellow, Clark Art Institute, Fall 2017. 2017 National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant (Co-PI: Omar Alcover), Archaeology Program (BCS- 1733551), $10,565. 2017 Alphawood Foundation, $206,045. 2015 National Science Foundation Senior Research Grant, Archaeology Program (BCS- 1505483/1505399), $154,212. 2015 Brown University Research Seed Funding, $75,000. 2012 Henry Merritt Wriston Fellowship, Brown University. 2011 National Science Foundation Senior Research Grant, Archaeology Program (BCS- 1115818), $42,721. 2010 Baylor University Undergraduate Research and Scholarly Activities Small Grant Program, $4,790.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Analysis by Overtopping During an Upstream Landslide in Peñitas
    https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-191 Preprint. Discussion started: 9 July 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. 1 Case Study: Risk Analysis by Overtopping During an Upstream 2 Landslide in Peñitas Dam, Mexico 3 Humberto J.F. Marengo1, Alvaro A. Aldama2 4 1Engineering Institute, UNAM, Mexico. 5 2 Independent Consultant, Cuernavaca, Mexico. 6 Correspondence to: Humberto Marengo ([email protected]) 7 Abstract. This research presents the procedure for risk assessment and reliability analysis to dam 8 overtopping (Peñitas) located downstream of a landslide dam. For the analysis are used six statistical 9 variables and their uncertainties, peak flood of the upstream dam, are evaluated with empirical formulas. 10 Highest water levels of the dam break event were computed using reservoir routing with an explicit 11 equation developed by authors. Afterward, overtopping risk analysis of Peñitas Dam was assessed for 12 different stages of excavation of the natural dam that were made for solve the problem. A sensitivity 13 analysis of duration of dam break is made, and also is calculated the possible upper elevation of Peñitas 14 dam, finding that is a recommended practice measurement in similar further cases. A methodology to do 15 an orderly and consistently analysis of risk is proposed to solve similar situations. 16 17 1. Introduction. Rain season on 2007 was very severe in the South-east part of Mexico and produced 18 during September and October higher flood until that date in Tabasco State. On 4 November 2007, took 19 place a landslide on Grijalva River, the second in the country with an extension of 80 Ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Waters During the 2009–2010 Drought Reveals Upcoming Trophic Status
    Spatiotemporal variability in Terminos Lagoon (Mexico) waters during the 2009–2010 drought reveals upcoming trophic status shift in response to climate change Renaud Fichez, Carlos Linares, Sandrine Chifflet, Pascal Conan, Adolfo Contreras Ruiz Esparza, Lionel Denis, Pascal Douillet, Christian Grenz, Jean-François Ghiglione, Francisco Gutiérrez Mendieta, et al. To cite this version: Renaud Fichez, Carlos Linares, Sandrine Chifflet, Pascal Conan, Adolfo Contreras Ruiz Esparza, et al.. Spatiotemporal variability in Terminos Lagoon (Mexico) waters during the 2009–2010 drought reveals upcoming trophic status shift in response to climate change. Regional Environmental Change, Springer Verlag, In press, 10.1007/s10113-019-01519-2. hal-02147089 HAL Id: hal-02147089 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02147089 Submitted on 4 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Regional Environmental Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01519-2 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Spatiotemporal variability in Terminos Lagoon (Mexico) waters – during the 2009 2010
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Inferring Ancient
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Inferring Ancient Technology and Practices of the Elite Maya Kingship Through the Application of Materials Engineering Characterization Modalities A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Materials Science and Engineering by Kristina Alyssa Cheung 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Inferring Ancient Technology and Practices of the Elite Maya Kingship Through the Application of Materials Engineering Characterization Modalities by Kristina Alyssa Cheung Master of Science in Materials Science and Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Ioanna Kakoulli, Chair This project focuses on the characterization of materials from burial offerings and painted decoration in a royal Maya tomb at El Zotz, Guatemala, and their association with mortuary rituals. Archaeological findings included vessels, jade masks, organic materials (wood, cord, and textiles), specular hematite cubes, shells with powdered cinnabar, green (malachite) painted stucco assumed to have decorated the wooden bier where the king was resting, and caches of lip-to-lip Aguila Orange bowls containing human phalanges. This paper describes findings from non-invasive and non-destructive analytical techniques including XRF, VPSEM- EDS, and XRD, emphasizing the potential of these combined technologies in the identification of organic and inorganic markers to infer burial customs. The nature and location of the findings, the evidence of pigment coloration on the bones employing hematite and cinnabar, and the indication of exposure of the bones to high temperatures suggest highly complex, even protracted mortuary practices of Maya elite. ii The thesis of Kristina Alyssa Cheung is approved. Kanji Ono Christian Fischer Ioanna Kakoulli, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2014 iii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • FLOODS GLIDE No
    Appeal N° MDRMX002 MEXICO: FLOODS GLIDE no. FL-2007-000200-MEX Operations Update n°1 14 November 2007 Period covered by this Operations Update: 6 November to 13 November 2007; Appeal target: CHF 1,208,000 (USD 1,042,278 or EUR 722,056); Appeal coverage: 98% <click here to go directly to the updated donor response report, or here to link to contact details > Appeal history: • This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on a preliminary basis on 6 November 2007 for CHF 1,208,000 (USD 1,042,278 or EUR 722,056) for four months to assist 40,000 beneficiaries. • Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF): CHF 200,000 (USD 173,563 or EUR 119,546) was initially allocated from the Federation’s DREF to support the National Society’s response. • Due to bilateral contributions from the Swiss Red Cross, this Operations Update n°1 includes a new objective The city of Villahermosa in Tabasco is still where 2,000 families will receive flooded. Source: International Federation cleaning kits and 3,600 children school kits. Summary: Since the onset of the emergency in the states of Tabasco and Chiapas, the Mexican Red Cross (MRC) activated its national response system, coordinated with local authorities, provided information for the Federation’s Disaster Management Information System (DMIS) and has been working arduously to provide relief aid to the affected population. The MRC headquarters in Mexico, F.D. dispatched a Rapid Intervention Unit (RIU) consisting of specialized personnel in disaster response, rescue equipment and vehicles. The National Rescue Director was deployed to Tabasco and led the operation with support from the Tabasco state delegate.
    [Show full text]
  • Metals Distribution and Contamination in the Gulf of Mexico
    METALS DISTRIBUTION AND CONTAMINATION IN THE GULF OF MEXICO Alfonso Vázquez-Botello, Susana Villanueva-Fragoso and Leticia Rosales-Hoz INTRODUCTION Metals are a natural part of the earth’s crust and are found in rocks, soils, sediments, water and volcanic eruptions. However, in the years following the industrial revolution major changes occurred in the natural concentration of metals, due to their widespread use for industrial and human purposes. One clear example of this is found in the Gulf of Mexico, where the excessive presence of some metals in the coastal ecosystems is a result of their introduction through contamination processes and contribution by rivers, which include the two largest deltas that run into the Gulf of Mexico: the Mississippi River in the U.S.A. and the Grijalva-Usumacinta rivers in Mexico. The contamination from the rivers and deltas includes toxic wastes such as metals, oil- based hydrocarbons and persistent organic contaminants such as pesticides and PCB. The industrial and commercial activities carried out in the big port areas of Brownsville, Corpus Christi, Houston and Galveston in the U.S.A., and Tampico-Madero, Altamira, Veracruz, Alvarado, Coatzacoalcos, Dos Bocas and Ciudad del Carmen in Mexico, are potential sources of contamination to marine and coastal environments. There are 22 rivers in Mexico that run into the Gulf, the most important of which is the Rio Grande (Río Bravo), that forms part of the border between Mexico and the U.S.A. A series of dams have been built along the Rio Grande, regulating its flow into the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Region MESOAMERICA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT
    Ecosystem Profile Northern Region Of The MESOAMERICA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT Belize, Guatemala, Mexico Final version January 15, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 THE ECOSYSTEM PROFILE.......................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................2 Biological Importance.............................................................................................................................. 2 Socioeconomic Context........................................................................................................................... 3 Progress in Conserving Biodiversity........................................................................................................ 4 CONSERVATION OUTCOMES ...................................................................................................5 Species Outcomes .................................................................................................................................. 6 Site Outcomes......................................................................................................................................... 7 Prioritization of the Key Biodiversity Areas.............................................................................................. 7 Corridor
    [Show full text]