Teresa Barnes, March 2015. Do not cite or circulate without permission:
[email protected] Teresa Barnes, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Beyond Protest: The University of Cape Town and complicity with apartheid1 UCT’s land runs down to the border of Groote Schuur, the Prime Minister’s residence in Rondebosch. The grounds staff of the residence used to use African prison labor, like a chain gang, to do the gardening. Once I saw an Afrikaner warder assaulting one of the prisoners. White UCT students were walking by. From their accents I think they were originally from Rhodesia. They watched the beating and laughed.2 …in existential terms we may need a way of telling what makes for a better or worse, a less or more significant response to the call of responsibility, of good or evil.3 The National Party (NP), which introduced the formal policies and legislation of apartheid in South Africa, won 39% of the vote in the 1948 general election, and nearly 64% in 1961.4 This means that white South Africans found the NP’s principles - apartheid, baaskap, white supremacy - to be increasingly attractive propositions.5 As many studies and the popular understandings of recent South African history have shown, the NP systematically, consciously and visibly inflicted severe discrimination and suffering on the 85% of the South African population.6 Consequently, as early as 1966, apartheid was branded as a “crime against humanity” by the United Nations.7 The election results cited above 1 The research that grew into this project began in my tenure in the History Department at the University of the Western Cape.