DOCSLIB.ORG

Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 1.32

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 1.32 Wednesday Volume 645 18 July 2018 No. 174 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 18 July 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 387 18 JULY 2018 388 Alun Cairns: The Government have committed to consult House of Commons later this year on the UK shared prosperity fund, which will be a Brexit dividend. We are already seeing a Brexit Wednesday 18 July 2018 dividend with the £20 billion increase in health spending, which will have considerable consequences for Scotland The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock and, rightly, for Wales. As their budgets are protected, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland will benefit PRAYERS significantly from that. Stephen Gethins: The Secretary of State’sanswer directly [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] contradicts the UK Government’s own analysis, which shows that Wales and every other part of the United Oral Answers to Questions Kingdom will be badly hit by their plans for Brexit. If the Government do have a plan for Brexit, we would love to hear it—and is there any economic analysis for it? WALES Alun Cairns: The hon. Gentleman ignores the hard data,whichshowsrecordnumbersof peopleinemployment The Secretary of State was asked— and sharp falls in unemployment. I have met a whole host Leaving the EU of international investors from the US, Qatar, Japan and elsewhere, and we are seeing significant foreign direct 1. John Mc Nally (Falkirk) (SNP): What recent investment projects coming to the UK. That shows the assessment he has made of the effect on the Welsh great opportunities there are as we leave the European economy of the UK leaving the EU. [906435] Union. 7. Gavin Newlands (Paisley and Renfrewshire North) Luke Graham (Ochil and South Perthshire) (Con) (SNP): What recent assessment he has made of the rose— effect on the Welsh economy of the UK leaving the EU. [906441] Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Ind) rose— 9. Stephen Gethins (North East Fife) (SNP): What recent assessment he has made of the effect on the Mr Speaker: We will hear from Mr Elphicke, but it is very nice to see you, Mr Graham. Welsh economy of the UK leaving the EU. [906443] The Secretary of State for Wales (Alun Cairns): Wales Charlie Elphicke: Thank you, Mr Speaker. approaches Brexit from a position of strength with a DoestheSecretaryof Stateagreethatthemostimportant growing economy and falling unemployment, and our market to the Welsh economy is the internal market of plan for Brexit will allow us to shape our own ambitious the United Kingdom? That is also true for Scotland, trade and investment opportunities, putting Wales and which is why it makes no sense that the Scottish National the wider UK at the forefront of global trade. party wants to peel Scotland away from the United Kingdom and the success of this nation. John Mc Nally: The Welsh Affairs Committee has now joined in the calls for the retention of membership Alun Cairns: The hon. Gentleman makes an extremely of the single market and customs union to protect the important point. He is right to say that the UK market agricultural sector, in which 80% of Welsh exports go to is more important to the Welsh and Scottish economies the EU. Will the Secretary of State confirm what than any international market is. It has already been representations he made to the Prime Minister ahead of demonstrated that Scotland sells four times more to the the Chequers agreement for continued membership for rest of the UK than to any international market. That the agricultural sector? dependence on the UK economy is greater for the Alun Cairns: As the House would expect, I looked Welsh economy. closely at that report, but of course the outcome that the hon. Gentleman suggests would mean that we could Stephen Kerr (Stirling) (Con): Does my right hon. Friend not honour the expectations of the British people following agree that the economic benefit of the city deals that the referendum decision to leave the European Union; have been agreed in Wales and Scotland is evidence of it would mean retaining free movement of people. The what is possible when the UK Government and the Chequers agreement protects the agricultural sector so devolved Administrations pull together in the same that it has the opportunity to trade frictionlessly with direction? the European Union. Alun Cairns: May I pay tribute to my hon. Friend, Gavin Newlands: By 2020, the Welsh economy will who has worked so hard on the Stirling city growth have been supported by almost £150 billion of investment deal? That exciting prospect, will offer real opportunities through EU structural funds. The Government committed for long-term economic regeneration. I take the opportunity to replacing that funding, along with support for farming to highlight the fact that Wales will be the only part of and the English NHS, with money from the mythical the UK that is entirely covered by city deals and growth Brexit dividend. Now that it is clear that the UK will deals. That meets the UK Government’s ambitions to not receive a single penny back from Brexit, will the close the wealth gap between the most prosperous and Secretary of State confirm that there will still be money most deprived areas of the UK by raising the economic for Wales? prospects of some of the poorest parts of the UK. 389 Oral Answers 18 JULY 2018 Oral Answers 390 Liz Saville Roberts (Dwyfor Meirionnydd) (PC): Given protection that the UK Government have given to Wales, the impact of Brexit uncertainty on the Welsh rural whereby Wales now receives £120 for every £100 spent economy, the Minister will surely agree that technology in England, demonstrates the priority that we put on and science opportunities must be seized. What is he protecting Wales’s interests. doing to ensure that Snowdonia Aerospace at Llanbedr becomes the UK’s first horizontal-launch spaceport? International Trading Opportunities: Promotion Alun Cairns: The hon. Lady is absolutely right. Llanbedr 2. Mr Ranil Jayawardena (North East Hampshire) offers great opportunities. The Secretary of State for (Con): What recent steps he has taken to promote Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and I have spoken Wales’s international trading opportunities. [906436] on a number of occasions about this, and I hope that the hon. Lady will welcome the statement that was The Secretary of State for Wales (Alun Cairns): My made last week and the additional money that is being Department continues to work closely with the Department made available to exploit the opportunities in Llanbedr. for International Trade on promoting Wales’s trading I am excited by this prospect, and we will put the hon. opportunities. During my recent trips to Qatar, Kuwait, Lady’s constituency at the forefront of space technology. Hong Kong and the US I saw at first hand the enthusiasm for Welsh exports as well as the potential for foreign Mr Speaker: Let us hear more about the horizontal direct investment projects to come to Wales. port situation. Mr Jayawardena: Given Wales’s connectivity on the Liz Saville Roberts: I will say more about the situation M4 corridor, does my right hon. Friend agree that we of the rural economy, given that the former Wales can truly capitalise on trading opportunities internationally Office Minister, the hon. Member for Aberconwy (Guto for Wales and, indeed, the Thames valley by improving Bebb), stood down this week to oppose the Brexiteers’ the Reading to Gatwick road corridor? wrecking amendments. At next week’s Royal Welsh show, will the Secretary of State announce his resignation Alun Cairns: My hon. Friend will be aware that I have in protest at the Government’s policy of wrecking Welsh been a strong supporter of the third runway at Heathrow livestock farming? because it is important to the Welsh economy, and connectivity to airports is vital to deliver its prospects Alun Cairns: First, I pay tribute to my hon. Friend and objectives. He is right about the M4 corridor. With the Member for Aberconwy (Guto Bebb) for his excellent the abolition of the Severn tolls, it creates an opportunity work at the Ministry of Defence in supporting the for a natural economy to develop between Bath, Bristol, defence services across the whole UK, as well as his role Newport and the south Wales economy in general, to in looking after agriculture as a Wales Office Minister. create further economic growth. The hon. Lady will be well aware that the Chequers agreement provides a frictionless trading opportunity Owen Smith (Pontypridd) (Lab): The Secretary of for Welsh farmers that will allow them to continue to State knows that Airbus is one of Wales’s most important sell Welsh beef and lamb, and other Welsh produce, to trading entities and companies, so does he think it is a the European Union as they do at the moment. good or bad sign that the chief executive of Airbus is so worried about the Government screwing up Brexit that Mr Speaker: In calling the hon. Member for Vale of he is now stockpiling goods that he feels he will not be Clwyd (Chris Ruane), I congratulate him on what I able to get in to make his finished products? understand is, unbelievably, his 60th birthday. Alun Cairns: I think the hon. Gentleman is out of Chris Ruane (Vale of Clwyd) (Lab): It’s a hard life! date. The latest statements from Airbus have welcomed The shadow Wales team recently met Farmers Union the Chequers agreement, because it will allow the company of Wales representatives, who are desperately worried to protect its supply chain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Expert Says Brexit Campaign Used Data Mined from Facebook 27 March 2018, by Danica Kirka
    Expert says Brexit campaign used data mined from Facebook 27 March 2018, by Danica Kirka persuade voters. "It was everywhere." Among the companies that had access to the data was AggregateIQ, a Canadian political consultant that did work for Vote Leave, the official campaign backing Britain's withdrawal from the EU, Wylie said. Wylie described Cambridge Analytica as just one arm of a global company, SCL Group, that gets most of its income from military contracts but is also a political gun-for-hire, often in countries where democratic institutions are weak. He suggested the company combines computer algorithms and dirty tricks to help candidates win regardless of the cost. Whistleblower Christopher Wylie who alleges that the The 28-year-old Canadian with a swath of pink hair campaign for Britain to leave the EU cheated in the referendum in 2016, speaking at a lawyers office to the says he helped set up Cambridge Analytica in media in London, Monday, March 26, 2018. Chris 2013. He left the next year. Wylie's claims center around the official Vote Leave campaign and its links to a group called BeLeave, which Wylie has previously alleged that Cambridge it helped fund. The links allegedly allowed the campaign Analytica used personal data improperly collected to bypass spending rules. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant) from Facebook users to help Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Cambridge Analytica says none of the Facebook The computer expert who alleges a trove of data was used in its work on the Trump campaign. Facebook data was improperly used to help It denies any wrongdoing.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of an Investigation in Respect Of
    Report of an investigation in respect of - Vote Leave Limited - Mr Darren Grimes - BeLeave - Veterans for Britain Concerning campaign funding and spending for the 2016 referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU 17 July 2018 1 Other formats For information on obtaining this publication in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Electoral Commission. Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The Electoral Commission is the independent body which oversees elections and regulates political finance in the UK. We work to promote public confidence in the democratic process and ensure its integrity. 2 Contents 1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 4 2 The decision to investigate ............................................................................. 9 3 The investigation .......................................................................................... 12 4 The investigation findings ............................................................................. 16 Joint spending by Vote Leave and BeLeave ................................................... 16 Vote Leave’s spending limit ............................................................................. 21 Other issues with Vote Leave’s spending return ............................................. 24 BeLeave’s spending ........................................................................................ 25 Mr Grimes’ spending return ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF on Watching the Watchmen
    REPORT Watching the Watchmen The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Sam Goodman About the Author Sam Goodman is the author of the Imperial Premiership: The Role of the Modern Prime Minister in Foreign Policy Making, 1964-2015 (Manchester University Press: 2015). He is currently working as a political adviser to Peter Dowd MP the current Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and has previously worked for a variety of Labour Members of Parliament including: Julie Cooper MP, Sir Mark Hendrick MP, Michael Dugher MP, and Rt. Hon Jack Straw MP. Watching the Watchmen: The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Members of the House of Commons have long flirted parliamentary conventions and much procedure with the idea of British exceptionalism—citing the is arcane, which makes it difficult even for the UK’s role as the ‘mother of all parliaments’, its most ardent politically engaged citizen to follow unwritten constitution, its unitary voting system, proceedings and debates in the House of Commons. and the principle of the sovereignty of Parliament This separation between the governors and over the people—as a bulwark against the instability governed is exacerbated further by the limited customarily found in other western democracies. avenues available to the public to hold those elected In modern times, this argument held water as to account, which is exemplified by recent political it delivered stable parliamentary majorities, scandals, including allegations of bullying and peaceful transfers of power between governments, sexual harassment in the House of Commons. At the and kept in check the ideological fringes of both time of writing this report, no MP has been forced major political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 July 2018 - - Page 1 of 38 - (I) Causing Or Permitting a Derogatory Article to Be Written in Brexit Central; And
    IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CASE NUMBER: [TBC] B E T W E E N: SHAHMIR SANNI (Claimant) -and- THE TAX PAYERS ALLIANCE LIMITED (Respondent) PARTICULARS OF CLAIM Parties (1) The Claimant was employed by the Respondent from 13 March 2017 to 13 April 2018. He was employed as a Digital Campaign Manager. His responsibilities included running the Respondent’s social media accounts, YouTube channel, and producing website content and video content. (2) The Respondent is a self-declared “grassroots campaigning group dedicated to reforming taxes, cutting spending and protecting taxpayers”. It is a lobbying group pursuing a right-wing political ideology. It operates from 55 Tufton Street, Westminster, an office block where seven other similar right-wing political organisations are based. (3) The Claimant was summarily dismissed by the Respondent on 13 April 2018. Legal Claims (4) The Claimant advances claims of: (a) Automatically Unfair Dismissal by reason of having made a protected disclosure (s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”)); (b) Directly discriminatory dismissal (s.13 and s.39(2)(c) Equality Act 2010 (“EqA 2010”) because of his belief that protecting the integrity and sanctity of British democracy from taint and corruption was paramount, which is a philosophical belief protected by s.10 EqA 2010 and in accordance with the characteristics set out in Grainger v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360; (c) Protected Disclosure detriment (s.47B ERA), namely:- _________________________ - Particulars of Claim - - 17 July 2018 - - Page 1 of 38 - (i) Causing or permitting a derogatory article to be written in Brexit Central; and (ii) Instructing Wilsons LLP to write the letter wrongly threatening defamation proceedings; and (iii) Permitting or causing the making of derogatory statements in public and the media on 4 July 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Believe Pundits' Claims About the Cost of Brexit.Pdf
    Don’t Believe Pundits’ Claims About the Cost of Brexit Experts agree leaving the European Union will damage the British economy, but past performance should make them wary of offering outlandish assertions about an unknowable future. Embattled British Prime Minister Theresa May put on a brave face last week at the U.K. Conservative Party’s annual conference in Birmingham. Facing pressure from all sides over what has become known as her Chequers proposal for an orderly Brexit, she reiterated her government’s commitment to leaving the European Union as scheduled on March 29 of next year. Ridiculing opponents’ calls for further compromise, she stated unequivocally that “Britain isn’t afraid to leave with no deal if we have to.” May’s feisty formal address was preempted by an off-program speech the day before by the former foreign secretary and perennial Conservative Party renegade Boris Johnson, who all but called for a no-deal hard Brexit as the only way to avoid bowing to a Brussels dictatorship. Johnson called the Chequers plan “a cheat” of the electorate and likened it to the 14th-century offense of praemunire. (According to the Oxford English Dictionary, that’s “the offence of asserting or maintaining papal jurisdiction in England.”) In another reference that left watchers turning to Wikipedia for enlightenment, Johnson warned that the Chequers plan would see the United Kingdom “paraded in manacles down the Rue de la Loi like Caractacus.” (For the record, he’s referring to “a 1st-century AD British chieftain of the Catuvellauni tribe, who led the British resistance to the Roman conquest.”) As Johnson and other hard Brexiteers portray the Chequers plan as an abrogation of British sovereignty, hard core Remainers who want the United Kingdom to stay in the European Union routinely warn that a no-deal Brexit will be an economic catastrophe for their country.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Next for Britain and for Europe? Senior European Experts Seminar
    Where next for Britain and for Europe? Senior European Experts Seminar Tuesday 26 February Regent’s University London 16:30 – 18:00 This background paper has been prepared by the Senior European Experts Group, an independent group of former UK ambassadors and former EU and UK government officials which prepares briefings on current EU topics for opinion formers. Introduction Brexit has been a huge challenge for the UK and a headache Just as there were differences within the UK, so there were for the EU. The 2016 referendum plunged the UK into a differences between the regions of England. London had the constitutional and political crisis. More than two years on, the highest vote to Remain but the Leave vote was highest in the UK’s future relationship with the EU is still unresolved. East and West Midlands.1 EU Member States have been united in their response to Detailed analysis of the result identified the two most Brexit, but divided when responding to other challenges such significant factors separating Leave from Remain voters as as immigration and the stability of the euro, as well as being their level of educational achievement and their age. No less troubled by the rise of populist parties in some Member States. than 78 per cent of those with no qualifications voted Leave What should their response be to Brexit in the longer term? (admittedly only about 10 per cent of voters), and 61 per cent How can they maintain a united European front on security and of those whose education had stopped at O-levels or CSEs trade in the face of the challenges from Putin and from Trump? (about a quarter of voters).2 Leave voters tended to be older than Remain voters, with 61 per cent of people over 65 voting This paper looks at the history of Brexit from the referendum to Leave compared to 60 per cent of 18-34 year-olds voting until the end of January 2019 and poses some questions to Remain.3 In addition, 59 per cent of voters identifying as about the future direction of the UK and of the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Impasse in Brexit Negotiations and Future Outlook
    Mitsui & Co. Global Strategic Studies Institute Monthly Report October 2018 CURRENT IMPASSE IN BREXIT NEGOTIATIONS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK Ryuji Hiraishi Strategic Information & Research Dept. Mitsui & Co. Europe PLC BREXIT NEGOTIATIONS DEADLOCKED AS TIME RUNS OUT The negotiations on the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (Brexit) are approaching a climax. The Brexit negotiations began on June 19, 2017 after the UK made the decision to leave the EU in a referendum held on June 23, 2016 and then submitted notice of its intention to leave the EU to the European Council on March 29, 2017 (Figure 1). Under Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon, a country that decides to leave the EU shall leave two years after submitting notice of its intention to leave even if it is unable to conclude a withdrawal agreement, unless there is unanimous agreement of all member states to extend the negotiation period. As such, the UK and EU are negotiating on the assumption that the UK will leave the EU on March 29, 2019, which will be two years after the UK submitted its notice. The Brexit negotiations are composed of the following three discussions: (1) the terms of withdrawal : including payment by the UK of its liabilities, securing the rights of citizens of both the UK and EU, and managing the border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland; (2) the future relationship: this could include a comprehensive FTA after the UK’s withdrawal; and (3) the transition period: this is the relationship in the period after withdrawal until the future relationship can be finalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 10 Brexit Update Report
    THIS PAPER RELATES TO ITEM 10 CLACKMANNANSHIRE COUNCIL ON THE AGENDA Report to: CLACKMANNANSHIRE COUNCIL Date of Meeting: 25TH October 2018 Subject: Brexit Update Report Report by: Strategic Director – Partnership & Performance 1.0 Purpose 1.1. The purpose of this report is to summarise the latest developments in Brexit negotiations, and to highlight the high level implications for Scotland and Clackmannanshire. Given the critical stage of the EU Withdrawal negotiations, it is advised that regular future briefings are prepared to ensure that Council is kept updated on developments. 2.0 Recommendations 2.1. It is recommended that Council: a) Note, challenge and comment on the report as appropriate; b) Note that future update briefings on EU Withdrawal negotiations will be brought to Council until at least 29th March 2019. 3.0 Considerations Background and Update on Brexit Negotiations 3.1. Details of the final withdrawal treaty and any transitional deals require to be ratified by the EU nations and the UK Parliament before the UK leaves in March 2019. Negotiations on the UK’s departure from the EU is governed by provisions in Article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union. Article 50 makes provision for a withdrawal agreement to include the terms of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and to take account of future relationship between the EU and the UK. Updates on the latest negotiation rounds in July and August 2018 have focussed on resolving the remaining issues in relation to the Withdrawal Agreement. Further negotiations in late August took place in Brussels with the focus being on the framework for future relationship between the UK and the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
    Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF | Brexit Blog: Why 'No Deal' May Still Be Avoided
    Economic and Financial Analysis 26 September 2018 Brexit blog: Why ‘no deal’ may still be avoided Article Plus: What markets should look out for in this year's political party conferences, and is the UK economy heading into another rough patch? Source: Shutterstock Theresa May, UK Prime Minister Content - Has the Salzburg meeting really raised the odds of no deal? - All eyes on Conservative Brexiteers as Labour reiterates it'll reject final deal - Other things to watch this week With six months to go until the UK leaves the EU, our weekly Brexit update/blog is back. Each week we'll try to give a brief digest of the twists and turns of the negotiations as the clock counts down, as well as provide our latest thoughts on the UK economy and markets. Has the Salzburg meeting really raised the odds of no deal? We kick-off following what has been, even by Brexit standards, a tumultuous period. The big hope for the meeting in Salzburg last week was that at long last, EU leaders would signal talks were moving closer to a positive conclusion. But in the event, the week ended in bitter disagreement and stark warnings from both UK and EU leaders. So what went wrong? Cast your mind back to July when the UK government reached a tentative (and ultimately short-lived) truce on what the future trading relationship should entail. The so-called Chequers plan, which was effectively centred on single market access for goods, was met with a cold reception in Europe. But despite a range of concerns - chiefly on the issue of cherrypicking - EU negotiators had appeared wary to completely destroy May's plan publically.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham from Eating Cake to Crashing
    University of Birmingham From eating cake to crashing out Kettell, Steven; Kerr, Peter DOI: 10.1057/s41295-019-00200-6 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Kettell, S & Kerr, P 2020, 'From eating cake to crashing out: constructing the myth of a no-deal Brexit', Comparative European Politics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00200-6 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Comparative European Politics. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00200-6 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]