DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive Summary Es.1 Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executive Summary Es.1 Introduction MTA New York City Transit Fulton Street Transit Center FEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), in cooperation with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), MTA Capital Construction (MTACC) and New York City Transit (NYCT), proposes the construction and operation of the Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC) to improve access to, from and within Lower Manhattan—the area south of Chambers Street in Manhattan. The Proposed Action consists of the construction and operation of a rehabilitated, reconfigured and enhanced multi-level, street-level, and subsurface station complex in Lower Manhattan that would serve 12 NYCT subway lines. The complex would extend from Church Street in the west to William Street in the east. The entry facility (“Entry Facility”) to the FSTC would be located on Broadway between Fulton and John Streets with a subsurface pedestrian passageway extending on Dey Street west to Church Street. The FSTC would include improvements to the following four (4) existing connected subway stations that comprise the existing Fulton Street – Broadway Nassau Subway Station Complex (Existing Complex): • 45 Fulton Street; • AC Broadway-Nassau; • 23 Fulton Street; and, • JMZ Fulton Street. In addition to the four (4) existing connected subway stations, the Proposed Action would also include improvements to the RW Cortlandt Street Station and the E World Trade Center (WTC) Station. In aggregate, the Proposed Action involves six (6) principal elements: 1. A new prominent Entry Facility at street-level, with a subsurface level passenger concourse (i.e. the Central Station Concourse), centrally located on Broadway between Fulton and John Streets that: integrates horizontal connectivity between the AC and 45 service with vertical connectivity between the street and different levels; and, provides improved street-level access and visibility. 2. Rehabilitation of the 45 line Fulton Street Station and the 23 line Fulton Street Station. 3. A subsurface pedestrian passageway (i.e. the Dey Street Passageway), beneath Dey Street between Broadway and Church Street connecting the Entry Facility to the WTC site with an access structure on the south side of Dey Street at Broadway (i.e. the Dey Street Access Plaza). 4. Improvements to the mezzanines and platform access at the AC line Fulton Street Station and JMZ line Fulton Street Station, improving circulation and reducing overcrowding conditions. 5. A pedestrian and passenger connection between the RW and E service. 6. Improved street access to the subway, including wider and more direct stairways, access for disabled customers, and new street entrances. The FSTC would provide direct access to the future concourse at the WTC site, from which access to a variety of transit options similar to those existing prior to September 11 is anticipated to be available, including: • The reconstructed 19 line Cortlandt Street Station; • The reconstructed Permanent WTC Port Authority Trans-Hudson (PATH) Terminal to the west; and, • The ferry terminal at the World Financial Center (WFC) further to the west. October 2004 Executive Summary ES-1 MTA New York City Transit Fulton Street Transit Center FEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation Improvements to transit facilities, particularly to the existing complex of stations encompassed by the Proposed Action, are not only needed to restore transportation functionality in support of the revitalization of Lower Manhattan, but to accommodate the range of changes that September 11 has triggered in the broader context of Lower Manhattan’s recovery. This includes the redevelopment of the WTC site, changes in the uses of certain buildings from commercial to residential, and anticipated substantial increases in visitor activity. Improvements to Lower Manhattan’s existing transportation facilities would substantially improve the quality of daily life for the area’s residents and workers and improve visitor experiences. These advances are important in retaining and developing Lower Manhattan’s commercial base. The FSTC is one (1) of three (3) currently identified priority transit projects meant to address the urgent need for comprehensive transit improvements in Lower Manhattan in response to the events of September 11. The two (2) other priority projects are the WTC Transportation Hub (also referred to as the Permanent WTC PATH Terminal), sponsored by the Port Authority of New York New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the South Ferry Subway Terminal Project, sponsored by the MTA and NYCT. These priority projects were formally identified by New York Governor George Pataki as the “Lower Manhattan Transportation Recovery Projects” through a coordinated process conducted in late 2002 and early 2003 by the Transportation Working Group, a group of decision-makers including the State of New York, the City of New York, MTA, PANYNJ and the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC). On February 27, 2003, U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta announced the selection of these projects as a group of nationally recognized transportation projects designated to receive high-level attention under President Bush’s September 18, 2002 Executive Order 13274, Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Review. This designation is intended to help expedite the rebuilding of the transit system damaged in the terrorist attacks as the projects advance through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process. The Proposed Action represents a much-needed enhancement of the transit facilities in key Lower Manhattan locations and also forms an essential node within the larger context of the regeneration of Lower Manhattan. As such, the Proposed Action would continue to be developed in close consultation with the other planning entities in Lower Manhattan. ES.2 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED The events of September 11 destroyed critical portions of the Lower Manhattan transportation system, compounding existing deficiencies and jeopardizing the area’s sustainability as a Central Business District, emerging residential area, and key tourist destination. Rebuilding the Lower Manhattan transportation network— restoring service, eliminating deficiencies and anticipating future needs—is a critical basis for the successful revitalization of Lower Manhattan. The New York City’s Vision for Lower Manhattan (the Mayor’s Vision) outlines the transportation needs of Lower Manhattan as well as the importance of connecting Lower Manhattan to the rest of the Tri-State area as part of the revitalization process. The concentration of subway lines at the centrally located Existing Complex makes it integral to this revitalization process. In order for the Existing Complex to realize its potential for contributing to the revitalization of Lower Manhattan and the region, its existing and anticipated operational deficiencies need to be addressed and its connectivity with other transit services and the street network needs to be improved. The Existing Complex is critical to the restoration and revitalization of the local and regional economy for the following reasons: • The Existing Complex houses the largest concentration of subway services in Lower Manhattan; • The Existing Complex is located in close proximity to other transit services (such as the PATH service) and to existing and future centers of activity, including the redeveloped WTC site and Memorial; and, • The Existing Complex is located centrally within the Lower Manhattan street network. October 2004 Executive Summary ES-2 MTA New York City Transit Fulton Street Transit Center FEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation In order for the Existing Complex to maximize its contribution to the economic recovery of Lower Manhattan and the region, and meet the increased transportation demand anticipated with the regeneration and growth in Lower Manhattan, substantial improvements are needed, including: • Improved connectivity of the Existing Complex with the WTC site and Memorial, WFC and PATH service; • Elimination of existing operational problems of the Existing Complex (including resolution of congestion); and, • Enhanced street-level wayfinding and access to the subway system. The proposed FSTC would be able to adequately accommodate present customer demands and anticipated year 2025 levels of demand for movement to, from, and within the FSTC. ES.3 ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK This FEIS has been prepared pursuant to NEPA, 42 U.S.C. Section 4321 et seq., and the New York State Environmental Quality Act (SEQRA), Article 8 of the New York Environmental Conservation Law, Section 8-0101 et seq., and their implementing regulations, to assist decision-makers in evaluating the environmental consequences of the Proposed Action and its alternatives, and to identify feasible measures to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts. The application of NEPA to mass transportation projects is reinforced in the Federal surface transportation statutes (23 U.S.C. Highways and 49 U.S.C. Transportation) that require the Secretary of Transportation to ensure NEPA mandates have been met before approving applications for Federal financial assistance. NEPA and SEQRA requirements necessitate a comparison between future conditions without the project (No Action Alternative) and future conditions with the project fully constructed and operational (Build Alternative). The incremental difference between these two (2) conditions is then considered to be the impact of the Proposed Action. The No Action Alternative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix H – Cultural Resources H-1 New York City Transit, Fulton Street Transit Center, New York
    PROPOSED FULTON STREET TRANSIT CENTER FULTON, DEY, CHURCH, & WILLIAM STREETS AND BROADWAY BLOCK 79, LOTS 15, 16, 18, 19 AND 21 NEW YORK, NEW YORK PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for: New York City Transit New York, New York Prepared by: The Louis Berger Group, Inc. New York, New York October 2003 MTA New York City Transit Fulton Street Transit Center DEIS APPENDIX H: CULTURAL RESOURCES H.1 INTRODUCTION New York City Transit (NYCT) is planning to construct the Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC) in the vicinity of Fulton Street and Broadway, covering portions of Fulton Street, Dey Street, Church Street, William Street and Broadway, with direct impacts to Block 79, Lots 15, 16, 18, 19 and 21, New York City, New York (see Figures 1 and 2). The Proposed Action includes: • Construction of a new Entry Facility building at Block 79, Lots 15, 16, 18, 19 and 21, designed to connect subway passengers with other elements of the FSTC; • Construction of a pedestrian tunnel underneath Dey Street, the Dey Street Passageway, from the Entry Facility at Broadway and to the redeveloped World Trade Center (WTC) site and RW service at the Cortlandt Street station at Church and Dey Streets; • Improvements to the Fulton Street AC underground mezzanines and JMZ entrances and mezzanines, by widening the existing facilities; • Installation of stairways at the southwest and southeast corners of the intersection of Maiden Lane and Broadway, and installation of stairway, escalator and an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) elevator at the southwest corner of Dey Street and Broadway to improve street access; • Rehabilitation of the existing 23 and 45 stations at Fulton Street; and, • Creation of a new, paid RW - E and an unpaid E to the FSTC connections along Church Street at the Chambers Street and WTC - Cortlandt Street stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fulton Street Transit Center Project: 3D/4D Model Application Report
    CIFECENTER FOR INTEGRATED FACILITY ENGINEERING Fulton Street Transit Center Project: 3D/4D Model Application Report By Timo Hartmann, William E. Goodrich, Martin Fischer, & Doug Eberhard CIFE Technical Report #TR170 MAY 2007 STANFORD UNIVERSITY COPYRIGHT © 2007 BY Center for Integrated Facility Engineering If you would like to contact the authors, please write to: c/o CIFE, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Stanford University Terman Engineering Center Mail Code: 4020 Stanford, CA 94305-4020 Fulton Street Transit Center Project: 3D/4D Model Application Report Timo Hartmann Ph.D. Student, CIFE Stanford University William E. Goodrich, P.E. Senior Project Manager, Parsons Brinckerhoff Fulton Street Project Martin Fischer Associate Professor Stanford University Doug Eberhard Chief Technology Officer Parsons Brinckerhoff 1 Executive Summary Within this report we describe the 3D/4D model implementation and application on the Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC) project during July 2004 to July 2005. The Fulton Street Transit Center is one of the major subway reconstruction projects in New York City. With a budgeted project value of $750 Million the New York City Transit Authority (TA) plans to refurbish the seven subway lines around Fulton Street [Figure 1]. Furthermore, the TA plans to build a new above ground Transit Terminal. On this project a joint venture between Parsons Brinckerhoff and Bovis Lendlease formed the consultant construction management team to support the TA with the tasks of constructability review, bid packaging and site supervision. Figure 1: Subway Lines around Fulton Street in Lower Manhattan Early on in the project the CCM team decided to build a 3D/4D model of the project to visually support the necessary engineering decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Historic Resources 5.1 Introduction
    CHAPTER 5. HISTORIC RESOURCES 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 CONTEXT Lower Manhattan is home to many of New York City’s most important historic resources and some of its finest architecture. It is the oldest and one of the most culturally rich sections of the city. Thus numerous buildings, street fixtures and other structures have been identified as historically significant. Officially recognized resources include National Historic Landmarks, other individual properties and historic districts listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places, properties eligible for such listing, New York City Landmarks and Historic Districts, and properties pending such designation. National Historic Landmarks (NHL) are nationally significant historic places designated by the Secretary of the Interior because they possess exceptional value or quality in illustrating or interpreting the heritage of the United States. All NHLs are included on the National Register, which is the nation’s official list of historic properties worthy of preservation. Historic resources include both standing structures and archaeological resources. Historically, Lower Manhattan’s skyline was developed with the most technologically advanced buildings of the time. As skyscraper technology allowed taller buildings to be built, many pioneering buildings were erected in Lower Manhattan, several of which were intended to be— and were—the tallest building in the world, such as the Woolworth Building. These modern skyscrapers were often constructed alongside older low buildings. By the mid 20th-century, the Lower Manhattan skyline was a mix of historic and modern, low and hi-rise structures, demonstrating the evolution of building technology, as well as New York City’s changing and growing streetscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • A $1.4 Billion Project That Created a New Transit Hub and Improved Links to Six Subway Stations in Lower Manhattan Was Completed Last Year
    AUTONOMOUSTHE FULTON CENTER SYSTEMS WEALTH CREATION A $1.4 billion project that created a new transit hub and improved links to six subway stations in Lower Manhattan was completed last year. The engineer and freelance writer Hugh Ferguson talked to Craig Covil, Principal of Arup and New York Project Director, to find out the main challenges and how they were overcome. The Fulton Center is a $1.4 billion subway changing platforms had to use cramped glass pavilion, surrounding a giant eight- interchange in New York, that improves passages, or rise to ground level and cross storey dome structure capped with a connections between six subway stations in busy streets. Peak hour ‘dwell times’ for 53ft-diameter oculus, inclined to draw the Lower Manhattan and has regenerated an trains had become unacceptably high, maximum amount of sunlight down area badly affected by the 9/11 attack in reducing train frequency and increasing through the building to the lowest 2001 and the economic crisis of 2008. With congestion still further, and the system- subterranean level. It is lined with a large- Arup as lead consultant, the project wide knock-on effects could affect services scale installation, the Sky Reflector-Net, The northwest corner of the Fulton Center, showing the dome and the oculus rising above the steel and glass pavilion. At the rear is combined a wide range of engineering skills, all day. which involved a detailed collaboration the west end of the Corbin Building projecting on to Broadway, with the eight-storey ‘interstitial’ building in between © James Ewing from modelling pedestrian movements to A key to the solution was a new central between engineering, art and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • The New-York Historical Society Library Department of Prints, Photographs, and Architectural Collections
    Guide to the Geographic File ca 1800-present (Bulk 1850-1950) PR20 The New-York Historical Society 170 Central Park West New York, NY 10024 Descriptive Summary Title: Geographic File Dates: ca 1800-present (bulk 1850-1950) Abstract: The Geographic File includes prints, photographs, and newspaper clippings of street views and buildings in the five boroughs (Series III and IV), arranged by location or by type of structure. Series I and II contain foreign views and United States views outside of New York City. Quantity: 135 linear feet (160 boxes; 124 drawers of flat files) Call Phrase: PR 20 Note: This is a PDF version of a legacy finding aid that has not been updated recently and is provided “as is.” It is key-word searchable and can be used to identify and request materials through our online request system (AEON). PR 000 2 The New-York Historical Society Library Department of Prints, Photographs, and Architectural Collections PR 020 GEOGRAPHIC FILE Series I. Foreign Views Series II. American Views Series III. New York City Views (Manhattan) Series IV. New York City Views (Other Boroughs) Processed by Committee Current as of May 25, 2006 PR 020 3 Provenance Material is a combination of gifts and purchases. Individual dates or information can be found on the verso of most items. Access The collection is open to qualified researchers. Portions of the collection that have been photocopied or microfilmed will be brought to the researcher in that format; microfilm can be made available through Interlibrary Loan. Photocopying Photocopying will be undertaken by staff only, and is limited to twenty exposures of stable, unbound material per day.
    [Show full text]
  • EMPIRE BUILDING, 71 Broadway (Aka 69-73 Broadway, 1-5 Rector Street, and 51-53 Trinity Place), Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission June 25, 1996, Designation List 273 LP-1933 EMPIRE BUILDING, 71 Broadway (aka 69-73 Broadway, 1-5 Rector Street, and 51-53 Trinity Place), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1897-98, [Francis H.] Kimball & [G. Kramer] Thompson, architects; Charles Sooysmith, foundation engineer; Marc Eidlitz & Son, builders. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 21 , Lot 6, and the portions of the adjacent sidewalk on which the described improvement is situated. ' On September 19, 1995, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Empire Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No . 3) . The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. The hearing was continued to December 12, 1995 (Item No. 1) . The hearing was subsequently continued to January 30, 1996 (Item No . 1). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Nineteen witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including Councilwoman Kathryn Freed and representatives of Manhattan Borough President Ruth Messinger, the Downtown Alliance, New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, Municipal Art Society, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Historic Districts Council, Fine Alts Federation, and Landmarks Committee of Community Board 1. A representative of the mortgagee attended the first hearing but took no position regarding the proposed designation. No one spoke in opposition to designation. The Commission has received several letters and other statements in support of designation, including a resolution by Community Board 1. Summary The richly decorative, neo-classical Empire Building was commissioned in 1895 by the Estate of Orlando B.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire Building Designation Report
    Landmarks Preservation Commission June 25, 1996, Designation List 273 LP-1933 EMPIRE BUILDING, 71 Broadway (aka 69-73 Broadway, 1-5 Rector Street, and 51-53 Trinity Place), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1897-98, [Francis H.] Kimball & [G. Kramer] Thompson, architects; Charles Sooysmith, foundation engineer; Marc Eidlitz & Son, builders. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 21, Lot 6, and the portions of the adjacent sidewalk on which the described improvement is situated.1 On September 19, 1995, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Empire Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. The hearing was continued to December 12, 1995 (Item No. 1). The hearing was subsequently continued to January 30, 1996 (Item No. 1). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Nineteen witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including Councilwoman Kathryn Freed and representatives of Manhattan Borough President Ruth Messinger, the Downtown Alliance, New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, Municipal Art Society, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Historic Districts Council, Fine Arts Federation, and Landmarks Committee of Community Board 1. A representative of the mortgagee attended the first hearing but took no position regarding the proposed designation. No one spoke in opposition to designation. The Commission has received several letters and other statements in support of designation, including a resolution by Community Board 1. Summary The richly decorative, neo-classical Empire Building was commissioned in 1895 by the Estate of Orlando B.
    [Show full text]
  • Everything Old Is New Again CONVERSIONS of HISTORIC PROPERTIES in LOWER MANHATTAN
    ALLIANCE FOR DOWNTOWN NEW YORK Everything Old is New Again CONVERSIONS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN LOWER MANHATTAN JUNE 2014 Remaking History Conver- Contents sions OF Historic Properties in Lower 3 Manhattan Remaking History 4 Temple Court Building 5 Pier A 6 Corbin Building 7 Battery Maritime Building 8 The Woolworth Building 9 195 Broadway 10 Cunard Building 11 1 Wall Street 12 70 Pine Street Source: SHORPY Everything Old Remaking is New Again History CONVERSIONS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES Conver- IN LOWER MANHATTAN sions OF Historic Properties in Lower Manhattan Source: SHORPY ew York City’s first “fireproof” building…The last The conversion of older office buildings provides a counterbal- surviving historic pier in Manhattan… The tallest ance to the new office space coming online at the World Trade Nbuilding in the world, circa 1913… A neo-Classical Center and elsewhere. In just the last ten years 10.1 million masterpiece with Ionic columns inspired by an ancient Greek square feet of older office stock has been taken offline, an temple… amount roughly equal to a fully built World Trade Center Site. Lower Manhattan teems with architectural splendor and inno- The conversion trend is poised to continue with another 5.1 vation — with renowned brick, iron, stone and steel creations million square feet under construction or in the planning stag- that are as much spectacles of daring and whimsy as they are es. Much of this activity is occurring in historic buildings, where feats of engineering. Now, many of the area’s most notable storied space is being transformed into a multitude of new in- historic structures are being infused with new life, as several carnations: residential units, hotels, eateries, and major retail landmark buildings attract a host of modern tenants, including projects throughout Lower Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Projects Update
    EMPLOYMENT & OFFICE RETAIL TOURISM & HOSPITALITY RESIDENTIAL MAJOR PROJECTS UPDATE ALLIANCE FOR DOWNTOWN NEW YORK LOWER MANHATTAN REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW Q2 2016 COMMERCIAL OFFICE MARKET Lower Manhattan’s commercial market sent mixed signals through the second quarter of 2016, echoing trends also seen in other Private Sector Employment submarkets. Office leasing was on par with activity last year but still below the historical average, and news of new major tenant Total Private relocations remained quiet. Despite this, there were clear areas 232,200 Sector Workers of strength. The vacancy rate is currently below 10 percent, and key Lower Manhattan companies committed to stay or expand Additional Workers in new locations south of Chambers Street. The arrival of new 5,100 Year Over Year commercial tenants and the opening of hotels and retail has pushed Lower Manhattan’s private sector employment to grow, workers or 2% growth year over year. The employment expansion reaching a new post-2001 peak of more than 232,000 employees cuts across all the key sectors that have been fueling Lower 1 as of the end of 2015. Manhattan’s economy and leasing activity. EMPLOYMENT The hotel, retail and restaurant sectors added the largest share of employees to Lower Manhattan over the course of 2015. These Private sector employment climbed to nearly 232,200 employees as industries grew by more than 2,000 employees or 10%. More than of the end of 2015, marking the sixth consecutive year of growth and 58 stores and restaurants were added to the retail market, including the highest point since Lower Manhattan had 236,700 private sector Brookfield Places’ offerings as well as three hotels with over 433 rooms.2 employees at the end of 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Corbin Building 192 Broadway New York, NY
    Corbin Building 192 Broadway New York, NY Schematic Lighting Design Matthew Trethaway | Lighting/ Electrical | Advisor: Dr. Houser1 Corbin Building World Trade Center 192 Broadway, New York, NY Corbin Building Introduction | Façade | Retail | Lobby | Office 2 Corbin Building Lower Manhattan New York, NY Congested area of tall buildings Introduction | Façade | Retail | Lobby | Office 3 Corbin Building 192 Broadway New York, NY Fulton Street Transit Center Corbin Building Introduction | Façade | Retail | Lobby | Office 4 Fulton Street Transit Center Introduction | Façade | Retail | Lobby | Office 5 Corbin Building “Renovation and integration into the design of the Transit Center while preserving its historic character.” Introduction | Façade | Retail | Lobby | Office 6 Corbin Building Statistics • Renovation of Retail / Office Space • Size 53,000 Square Feet • Cost $59.5 Million • Owner Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) • Architect Page Ayres Cowley Architects • SMEP Arup • Contractor Judlau Contracting Introduction | Façade | Retail | Lobby | Office 7 Lighting Overview Areas of Interest • Exterior Façade: Outdoor Space • Lobby: Psychological Impressions • Retail Store: Special Purpose Space • Open Office: Large Work Space 3 Schematic Design Concepts 3rd floor Introduction | Façade | Retail | Lobby | Office 8 Lighting Overview Areas of Interest • Exterior Façade: Outdoor Space • Lobby: Psychological Impressions • Retail Store: Special Purpose Space • Open Office: Large Work Space 3 Schematic Design Concepts 3rd floor Introduction | Façade
    [Show full text]
  • Corbin Building
    Corbin Building Technical Assignment 2 Matthew Trethaway Lighting/ Electrical AE 481W 10/26/2011 Advisor: Ted Dannerth 10/26/2011 Technical Report II 1 Executive Summary The following report is an overview and analysis of the existing electrical system for the Corbin Building in New York City, NY. The 53,000 square foot building is a multi-use facility composed of street level retail and eight floors of open office space. The building is to accommodate a variety of store and office configurations therefore the electrical system needs to be flexible to control the building systems. The documentation and analysis includes an overall summary of the electrical system including power distribution, utility information, service entrance, voltage system, emergency system and major equipment and loads. The service entrance size was calculated three ways to show the size of the system for each design phase. Communication systems summary was provide for each system in the building.. A single-line diagram is included to show the electrical distribution system thought the building starting at the service entrance and ending at the branch circuit panels. Matthew Trethaway | Lighting/Electrical | Corbin Building | 192 Broadway, New York | Advisor: Ted Dannerth 10/26/2011 Technical Report II 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Power Distribution Systems ............................................................. 3 Summary .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Alliance, MTA Unveil Large-Scale Rendering of Things to Come at Corbin Building
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Nicole Kolinsky, [email protected], 212-835-2763 MTA Press Office, 212-878-7440 Downtown Alliance, MTA Unveil Large-Scale Rendering of Things to Come at Corbin Building New York, NY (September 8, 2011) – The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) and the Alliance for Downtown New York today announced the installation of a large- scale rendering of things to come on the façade of the Corbin Building. “As we make progress on the restoration of the Corbin Building and the building of the Fulton Street Transit Center, we’re pleased to work with the Alliance for Downtown New York to help mitigate the impacts of construction by installing public art where possible. The Corbin Building wrap shows what the finished Corbin Building will look like and improves the aesthetics of the construction site,” said Michael Horodniceanu, President of MTA Capital Construction. “This is a very distinctive project, following the European tradition of large-scale architectural renderings that show pedestrians what the future holds,” said Elizabeth H. Berger, President of the Downtown Alliance. “We are glad that this project could be part of our Re:Construction program, which provides an opportunity for government, property owners, business people, artists and curators to work together.” The Corbin project is home to the 27th Re:Construction installation. Launched in 2007, Re:Construction is produced by the Downtown Alliance, and funded by a $1.5 million grant from the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. About half of the 26 earlier temporary installations are still up for viewing in the area. The MTA is committed to preserving the historic Corbin Building and is restoring it as part of the Fulton Street Transit Center project.
    [Show full text]