DOCSLIB.ORG

Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan 2015 Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan 2015 Final Prepared for the Inyo County Public Works Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Inyo 2015 Regional Transportation Plan FINAL Prepared for the Inyo County Transportation Commission 168 N. Edwards Street Independence, CA 93526 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 5875 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C Tahoe City, California 96145 530 583-4053 September 22, 2015 LSC #147440 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Development Requirements and Process ......................................................................... 1 RTP Process ............................................................................................................................. 2 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS .................................................... 15 Regional Characteristics .......................................................................................................... 15 Transportation Land Use Integration ....................................................................................... 23 Roadway Transportation System Description ......................................................................... 23 Transit Services ....................................................................................................................... 40 Non-Motorized Facilities ........................................................................................................ 44 Aviation ................................................................................................................................... 52 Goods Movement .................................................................................................................... 53 Transportation System Operations and Management .............................................................. 56 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... 56 Climate Change ....................................................................................................................... 57 3 POLICY ELEMENT .................................................................................................................... 59 Regional Transportation Needs and Issues ............................................................................. 59 Local and Regional Issues and Needs .................................................................................... 60 Goals, Policies, and Objectives .............................................................................................. 61 4 ACTION ELEMENT .................................................................................................................... 69 Plan Assumptions .................................................................................................................... 69 Transportation Safety .............................................................................................................. 70 Transportation Security / Emergency Preparedness ................................................................ 70 Funding Strategies ................................................................................................................... 71 Transportation System Improvements ..................................................................................... 71 Environmental Mitigation ....................................................................................................... 92 Inyo County Strategies to Reduce GHG Emissions ................................................................ 93 5 FINANCIAL ELEMENT ............................................................................................................. 95 Roadway Improvement Funding ............................................................................................. 95 Transit Improvement Funding ............................................................................................... 103 Aviation ................................................................................................................................. 105 Projected Revenues ............................................................................................................... 105 Appendix A ..................................................................................................................................... Acronyms Appendix B ................................................................................................................................. RTP Process Appendix C ................................................................................................... Public Involvement Procedures Appendix D .................................................................................................................. Correspondence/Input Appendix E .......................................................................................................................... LOS Description Appendix F ..................................................................................................................................... Accidents Inyo 2015 Regional Transportation Plan LSC Transportation Consultants Inc. Page i Appendix G ............................................................................................... US 395 10 Year Collision History Appendix H .......................................................................................................................... Bridge Inventory Appendix I ........................................................................................................ Tribal Transportation Needs Appendix J ................................................................................................................ Response to Comments LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Participation Process During RTP Development ............................................................................ 4 2 Inyo County Median Household Income ....................................................................................... 12 3 Inyo County 2013 Demographic Estimates ................................................................................... 15 4 Inyo County Population Projections ............................................................................................... 17 5 Inyo County Population Forecasts by Age ..................................................................................... 17 6 Eligibility for Free Reduced School Lunches .................................................................................. 21 7 Inyo County Commute Pattern Data .............................................................................................. 22 8 Inyo County Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes on State Highways .................................... 28 9 Inyo County Peak Month Average Daily Traffic Volumes on State Highways .............................. 29 10 Traffic Counts in Death Valley National Park ................................................................................ 30 11 Inyo County State Highway Peak Hour Roadway Level of Service ............................................... 31 12 Truck Traffic on Inyo County State Highways ............................................................................... 32 13 RTP Program Level Performance Measures ................................................................................... 72 14 Project Selection Criteria ................................................................................................................. 74 15 Recently Completed Transportation Improvement Projects in Inyo County .................................. 74 16 Inyo County 2015 Ten Year SHOPP Projects ................................................................................. 77 17 Top Priority Funded Roadway and Bridge Projects ........................................................................ 78 18 Inyo County Mid-Term Regional Roadway Projects ...................................................................... 79 19 Inyo County Long-Term Regional Roadway Projects .................................................................... 80 20 Inyo County Regional Highway Bridge Program Projects .............................................................. 81 21 Inyo County Financially Unconstrained Roadway Projects ............................................................ 82 22 Inyo County Regional Public Transit Projects ................................................................................ 83 23 Inyo County Active Transportation Projects ................................................................................... 84 24 Inyo County Long-term Regional Bicycle Facility Projects ........................................................... 85 25 Inyo County Financially Unconstrained Regional Bicycle Facility Projects .................................. 87 26 Inyo County Short-term Regional Airport Capital Improvement Projects ...................................... 91 27 Inyo County Long-term Regional Airport Capital Improvement Projects ...................................... 92 28 RTP Forecast Revenue Summary .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks a Tool for Planning Stock-Supported Wilderness Trips
    Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Parks Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks A tool for planning stock-supported wilderness trips SEQUOIA & KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS Wilderness Office 47050 Generals Highway Three Rivers, California 93271 559-565-3766 [email protected] www.nps.gov/seki/planyourvisit/wilderness.htm Revised May 6th, 2021 EAST CREEK .............................................................................. 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPHINX CREEK .......................................................................... 19 INTRO TO GUIDE ........................................................................ 2 ROARING RIVER ....................................................................... 19 LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE............................................................. 3 CLOUD CANYON ....................................................................... 20 STOCK USE & GRAZING RESTRICTIONS: DEADMAN CANYON ................................................................ 20 KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARK .................................... 4 SUGARLOAF AND FERGUSON CREEKS ................................. 21 SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARK ................................................ 6 CLOVER AND SILLIMAN CREEKS .......................................... 23 MINIMUM IMPACT STOCK USE ................................................ 8 LONE PINE CREEK .................................................................... 23 MINIMUM
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Trail Names and Quotas for Inyo National Forest
    Wilderness Trail Names and Quotas for Inyo National Forest • Quota is the number of people that can start at the listed location each day. • Permit is only valid to start on specific entry date and location reserved. • (JMT) or (PCT) indicates trail connects to the John Muir Trail or Pacific Crest Trail. • Information about quotas, commercial use, wilderness permit requirements on page 3. • For help identifying what quota applies for a trip, contact our wilderness permit office. Trail Name Trail Total Reserve Reserve Commercial Code Quota (6 month (2 weeks Quota – Notes* advance) advance) Baker Lakes JM22 8 5 3 Special Approval Baxter Pass (JMT) JM29 8 5 3 Special Approval Beck Lake AA12 15 9 6 *Single quota Big Pine Creek North Fork JM23 25 15 10 15 (PO); 8 (O/G) Big Pine Creek South Fork JM24 12 7 5 *Single quota Birch Lake JM25 8 5 3 Special Approval Bishop Pass (JMT) JM21 36 22 14 15 Blackrock GT66 Non Quota--Unlimited Bloody Canyon AA03 8 5 3 Special Approval Convict Creek JM04 10 6 4 *Single quota Cottonwood Lakes JM39 60 36 24 15 Cottonwood Pass (PCT) GT60 40 24 16 Non-quota Deer Lakes JM0 10 6 4 *Single quota Duck Pass (JMT) JM01 30 18 12 15 Fern Lake AA13 10 6 4 *Single quota Fish Creek AA14 15 9 6 15 Gable Lakes JM12 8 5 3 Special Approval George Creek - Mt. Williamson JM33 8 5 3 Special Approval George Lake JM18 10 6 4 *Single quota Gibbs Lake AA02 8 5 3 *Single quota Glacier Canyon AA01 8 5 3 *Single quota Golden Trout Lakes (Onion JM30 10 6 4 Special Approval Valley) Haiwee Pass (PCT) SS64 Non Quota--Unlimited High Trail –PCT
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Potential of the John Muir Wilderness, Fresno, Inyo, Madera, and Mono Counties, California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1185-C UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE JOHN MUIR WILDERNESS, FRESNO, INYO, MADERA, AND MONO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By 2 E. A. du Bray1, D. ~ Dellinger1, H. W. ~ver 1 , M. F. Diggl~l, Fredrick L. J~ , Horace K. 'lburber , Richard W. Morris , Thomas J. Peters , and David s. Lindsey STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and the Joint Conference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the John Muir Wilderness, Inyo and Sierra Na tional Forests, Fresno, lnyo, Madera, and Mono Counties, California. The area was established as a wilderness by Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964. SUMMARY The U.S. Bureau of Mines arj the U.S. Geological Survey identified many areas of the John Muir Wilderness as having marginal and subeconomic resources of tungsten, molybdenum, copper, gold, and silver.
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop Creek Progress Report 2: APPENDIX D - BISHOP CREEK GENERAL WILDLIFE TECHNICAL MEMO
    Bishop Creek Progress Report 2: APPENDIX D - BISHOP CREEK GENERAL WILDLIFE TECHNICAL MEMO Results of General Wildlife Surveys Bishop Creek Hydroelectric Power Project (FERC No. 1394) Relicensing Inyo County, California Prepared for Mr. Finlay Anderson Kleinschmidt Group 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 550 Portland, Oregon 97232 T: 503.345.7956 Prepared by Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 T: 714.751.7373 March 2020 Bishop Creek Hydroelectric Power Project (FERC No. 1394) Relicensing TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Project Background ..................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................. 1 3.1 Project Facilities Use .......................................................................................... 3 3.1.1 Reservoirs ............................................................................................... 3 3.1.2 Dams and Diversions .............................................................................. 3 4.0 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 5 4.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................ 5 4.2 General Wildlife Field
    [Show full text]
  • The Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan 2019-2039
    The Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan Prepared2019-2039 For the PUBLIC DRAFT NEVADA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Prepared for the Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants County Of Inyo Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan 2019-2039 Prepared for the Inyo County Local Transportation Commission 168 N. Edwards St Independence, CA 93526 760 • 878-0201 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 2690 Lake Forest Road Post Office Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 530 • 583-4053 June 12, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction and RTP Overview ................................................................................................ 1 Plan Development and Process ....................................................................................................... 2 Participation and Consultation Process ........................................................................................... 2 Social Equity and Environmental Justice Considerations .............................................................. 15 Coordination with Other Plans and Studies ................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: Background Conditions ............................................................................................................ 17 Regional Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 17 Public Health and Health Equity ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JONGS CANYON NATIONAL PARK/ /If UNITED STATES KINGS CANYON DEPARTTTTT of the INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK HAROLD L
    JONGS CANYON NATIONAL PARK/ /If UNITED STATES KINGS CANYON DEPARTTTTT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK HAROLD L. ICKES, SECRETARY (CREATED MARCH 5, 1940) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ARNO B. CAMMERER, DIRECTOR CALIFORNIA PARK SEASON THE GENERAL GRANT GROVE SECTION AND THE FLOOR OF KINGS CANYON IN KINGS CANYON "K-ATIONAL PARK ARE OPEN ALL YEAR, WITH FEDERAL AND STATE AUTHORITIES COOPERATING TO CLEAR THE ROADS IN WINTER, IT IS SELDOM THAT TRAVEL IS INTERRUPTED MCRE THAU A OAY OR TWO. CAMPGROUNDS, OF COURSE, ARE NOT OPEN DURING THE WINTER SEASON, BUT INFORMAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE GENERAL GRANT GROVE SECTION OF THE NEW PARK. ALL FORMS OF WINTER SPORTS, EXCEPT SKATING, ARE ENJOYEO; AND SNOWSHCES, SKIS, AND TOBOGGAN'S MAY BE RENTED AT REASONABLE TRICES IN GENERAL GRANT GROVE SEC­ TION. ENTRANCES OVER HIGH MOUNTAIN PASSES ARE NOT OPEN TC TRAVEL UNTIL AFTER JULY I. ADMINISTRATION THE KINGS CANYON-'NATIONAL PARK IS ADMINISTERED 'BY THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THIS BUREAU IN DIRECT CHARGE OF THE PARK is GUY HOPPING, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS IS AT THE PLAZA, NEAR THE CENTER OF THE GENERAL GRANT GROVE SECTION, ALL-YEAR MAIL, TELEPHONE, AND TELEGRAPH SERVICE IS MAINTAINED AT THIS POINT. THE POST OFFICE ADDRESS AT PRESENT IS GENERAL GRANT NA­ TIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA, BUT WILL BE CHANGED TO KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARK. LOCATION AMD USE KINGS CANYON "ATIOHAL PARK INCLUDES THE HEADWATERS OR KINGS RIVER, INCLUDING THE WATERSHEDS OF BOTH THE SOUTH FORK AND MIDDLE PORK, THE EVOLUTION BASIN OF THE UPPER PART OF THE SOUTH FORK OF THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER AND THE CREST AND WESTERN SLOPE OF THE SIERRA NEVADA FROM JUNCTION PEAK TO MOUNT LAMARK, A SUMMIT AREA CONTAINING PEAKS OF MORE THAN 14,000 FOOT ALTITUDE.
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep (Ovis Canadensis Californiana) and Proposed Taxonomic Revision; Proposed Rule
    Wednesday, July 25, 2007 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis californiana) and Proposed Taxonomic Revision; Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:27 Jul 24, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\25JYP2.SGM 25JYP2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2 40956 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD), call the Federal Information including or excluding any areas that Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. exhibit those impacts; and Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (6) Whether we could improve or modify our approach to designating 50 CFR Part 17 Public Comments Solicited critical habitat in any way to provide for RIN 1018–AV05 We intend that any final action greater public participation and resulting from this proposal will be as understanding, or to better Endangered and Threatened Wildlife accurate and as effective as possible. accommodate public concerns and and Plants; Designation of Critical Therefore, we seek comments or comments. Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn suggestions on this proposed rule. We If you wish to comment, you may Sheep (Ovis canadensis californiana) particularly seek comments concerning: submit your comments and materials and Proposed Taxonomic Revision (1) The reasons why we should or concerning this proposal by any one of should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical several methods (see ADDRESSES). If you AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act (16 use e-mail to submit your comments, Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the 2018 Inyo County
    VISITOR’S GUIDE TO IINNYYOOCCOOUUNNTTYY 11 TH EDITION www.TheOtherSideOfCalifornia.com Table of Contents Chamber of Commerce of Inyo County Birds Come Back to Owens Lake Page 4 Bishop Chamber of Commerce & Borax Wagons Find A New Home Page 6 Visitor Center 690 N. Main St. Bishop, CA 93514 Enchanting Fall Colors Page 8 760-873-8405 1-888-395-3952 760-873-6999 Enjoy Bishop’s Big Backyard Page 10 [email protected] www.bishopvisitor.com Appealing Adventures in Lone Pine Page 11 Death Valley Chamber of Commerce 118 Highway 127 Everyone Loves A Parade Page 12 P.O. Box 157 Shoshone, CA 92384 760-852-4524 Historic Independence Page 14 760-852-4144 www.deathvalleychamber.org Direct Results Media, Inc. Direct ResultsLone Media, Pine Inc. Big Pine: An Adventure Hub Page 15 Chamber of Commerce 124 Main St BusinessPO B oCardsx 749 Inyo County Fun Facts Page 16 Lone Pine, CA 93545 Rodney Preul Ph: 760-876-4444 Fx: 760-876-9205 Sales Associate Owens River Links LA And Inyo Page 17 [email protected] https://w3.5x2ww.lonepinechamber.org Inyo Attractions At A Glance Page 19 6000 Bel Aire Way Cell: 760-382-1640 Bakersfield, CA 93301 [email protected] The 2018 Inyo County Visitor Guide is produced by the Lone Pine Chamber of Government Agencies: Commerce and the County of Inyo. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) contents do not necessarily reflect the views 760-872-4881 of the Lone Pine Chamber of Commerce or the County of Inyo. (Except for our view that Inyo County is a spectacular place to visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Crest Trail (California – Sierra Nevada) Tehachapi, CA to Echo Lakes, CA (Sections F-J : 527 Miles) Please Put Phones on Mute Unless Speaking
    PCT-SIERRA (2017) Pacific Crest Trail (California – Sierra Nevada) Tehachapi, CA to Echo Lakes, CA (Sections F-J : 527 Miles) Please put phones on mute unless speaking. This will reduce background noise. Thank You!!! March 21st, 2017 @ 7:00PM Pacific Time Double Tap (Matt Parker) Hitchcock Lakes Sequoia NP Mile 767 August 2007 3/21/2017 PCT-SIER ® 1 AGENDA • Sierra Snow Data & SoCal Potential Snow Areas • Special Gear • Guest Speaker Ned Tibbits (Snow Safety Courses) • Maps • Section G Potential Exit Points • High Sierra Passes Summary & Information Sapphire Lake Kings Canyon NP • Pass Strategy (1 Pass Per Day) Mile 842 • Times of day to ascend & descend from passes August 2007 • Potential Exit Points in the Sierra • Photos of High Sierra Passes (South & North sides) • Flipping Strategies • Water Crossings • Resupply Strategy • Questions & Answers 3/21/2017 PCT-SIER ® 2 GENERAL COMMENTS • All mileage points in presentation are referenced to Halfmile mileage points. • 2017 is a UNIQUE year. 2016-2017 Winter is the 2nd Wettest Sierra Winter on record for the Sierra. • Still plenty of Winter left. However, no major storms in March so far and temperatures have been warm. • May be safer and easier to start earlier (before the thaw). • Daily mileage in snow is reduced (~1 mile per hour). • Multiple set of footsteps in snow, can be confusing. • Lots of roads up to PCT crossings or side passes may be closed until later in the season due to snow. • All photos are taken during the PCT 2014 hiking season which was low snow Winter. Some photos from JMT 2007 (August).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Policy Element
    Attachment D Inyo 2015 Regional Transportation Plan FINAL Prepared for the Inyo County Transportation Commission 168 N. Edwards Street Independence, CA 93526 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 5875 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C Tahoe City, California 96145 530 583-4053 September 16, 2015 LSC #147440 Chapter 1 Introduction As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for the region, the Inyo County Transportation Commission (ICLTC) is required by California law to adopt and submit an updated Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) at least every five years. The region is defined as geographic Inyo County, California. Broad in scope, the purpose of the plan is to provide a transportation vision for the region, supported by goals, for 10- and 20-year planning horizons. This is accomplished by identifying transportation related needs and issues on a regional level, reaffirming the region’s goals, objectives and policies, developing a list of improvements to the transportation system that meet the identified needs and prioritizing these improvements so as to create a financially constrained plan. The RTP for the Inyo region was last updated in 2009. After this update to the RTP, the ICLTC has agreed to update the RTP at least every four years. In exchange, the City of Bishop and County of Inyo will only be required to update the Housing Element to their respective General Plan once every eight years. The Inyo County regional transportation system includes all types of transportation modes: roadways, public transit, bicycle paths, pedestrian facilities, airports, rail, and other strategies to improve the flow and safety of the regional transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflower Hot Spots of the Eastern Sierra Welcome to the Eastern Sierra…
    Wildflower Hot Spots of the Eastern Sierra Welcome to the Eastern Sierra… THE EASTERN SIERRA truly is a land of superlatives: Elevations you will visit using this guide range from the oldest living trees on the planet (bristlecone pines); 3,300 feet (1,005 meters) at Fossil Falls to 10,200 feet the highest peak in the contiguous United States (Mt. (3,100 meters) at the Mosquito Flat trailhead in Rock Whitney); the youngest mountain range in North Creek. Many of the peaks around you soar to more than America (Mono Craters); one of the oldest lakes in 13,000 feet, and a side trip into Death Valley will plunge North America (Mono Lake). All of these and more are you down to below sea level at Badwater. within an easy day’s drive of each other. The spectacular landscapes of this area draw a worldwide audience, and with good reason. The elevation range combined with the diverse geologic environment results in a wide variety of vegetation communities. Three major biotic provinces—the Mojave Geology field classes often visit the area for the Desert, Great Basin, and Sierra Nevada—all converge in relatively easy access to a wide variety of geologic this area. Dozens of plant communities and thousands formations and rock types. Volcanic craters, basalt flows, of plant species occur here, many of them unique to layers of ash and pumice, carbonate formations, and the Eastern Sierra. This guide is an introduction to the granite peaks, walls, and spires all can be seen here. botanical gems to be encountered here.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 X9b and A17 Zone Hunt Info
    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Wildlife Branch 1010 Riverside Parkway, West Sacramento, CA 95605 ZONE X9b and Area-Specific Archery Hunt A17 2021 General Deer Hunting Information (Includes Additional Hunt G-3) GENERAL INFORMATION This information sheet has been prepared to assist deer hunters applying for, or planning to hunt in, Zone X-9b located in portions of Inyo County. The following information should be useful to hunters for archery season (A-17; Zone X-9b Archery Hunt), Zone X-9b general season, and any “additional hunts” within this geographic area. For more specific information or additional questions regarding this area, contact the following Department office(s): • Inland Deserts Region (Region 6), Bishop Field Office (760-872-1171). REGULATIONS Laws and regulations are designed to conserve wildlife and to provide for an equitable distribution of game mammals. All hunters should read and be familiar with the Current Hunting Regulations. Remember, if you are hunting on private property you must obtain, and have in your possession written permission to hunt on private property. Hunter trespass laws are strictly enforced. NON-LEAD RESTRICTIONS As of July 1, 2019, all hunters must use nonlead ammunition when taking any wildlife in California, except when hunting with a pellet rifle for approved species. • CCR T14 250.1(d)(3) Effective July 1, 2019, it shall be unlawful to use, or possess with any firearm capable of firing, any projectile(s) not certified as nonlead when taking any wildlife for any purpose in this state. • CCR T14 475(f) The take or attempted take of any nongame bird or nongame mammal with a firearm shall be in accordance with the use of nonlead projectiles and ammunition pursuant to Section 250.1 of these regulations.
    [Show full text]