DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Metropolitan Region Groundwater Sources Background Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greater Metropolitan Region Groundwater Sources Background Document Water Sharing Plan Greater Metropolitan Region Groundwater Sources Background document Leading policy and reform in sustainable water management Publisher NSW Office of Water Level 18, 227 Elizabeth Street GPO Box 3889 Sydney NSW 2001 T 02 8281 7777 F 02 8281 7799 [email protected] www.water.nsw.gov.au The NSW Office of Water manages the policy and regulatory frameworks for the State’s surface water and groundwater resources to provide a secure and sustainable water supply for all users. The Office of Water also supports water utilities in the provision of water and sewerage services throughout New South Wales. Water Sharing Plan for the Greater Metropolitan Region Groundwater Sources – Background document July 2011 ISBN 978 1 74263 013 7 © State of New South Wales through the Department of Primary Industries, 2011 This material may be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, providing the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are clearly and correctly acknowledged. Disclaimer: While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of publication, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document. NOW 11_069b Water Sharing Plan for the Greater Metropolitan Region Groundwater Sources – Background document Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the plan ............................................................................................................................... 3 Why are water sharing plans being prepared? ............................................................................. 3 Benefits for water users................................................................................................................. 3 Environmental considerations ....................................................................................................... 4 Description of the plan area................................................................................................................... 5 Fractured rock groundwater sources ............................................................................................ 5 Porous rock groundwater sources ................................................................................................ 5 Coastal sands, tertiary sands and alluvial groundwater sources.................................................. 6 Land use history ............................................................................................................................ 8 Climate ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Entitlement and use..................................................................................................................... 10 Local water utility requirements................................................................................................... 11 Developing the plan............................................................................................................................. 12 Scope of the plan ........................................................................................................................ 12 Water management units ............................................................................................................ 13 Project groups ............................................................................................................................. 13 State Interagency Panel.................................................................................................... 13 State Groundwater Panel.................................................................................................. 14 Regional Assessment Working Groups ............................................................................ 14 Greater Metropolitan Interagency Working Group............................................................ 14 Coxs River Water Management Committee ..................................................................... 14 Policy context .............................................................................................................................. 14 National Water Initiative .................................................................................................... 14 Natural Resources Commission ....................................................................................... 15 Catchment Action Plan ..................................................................................................... 16 Other considerations ................................................................................................................... 16 Protecting Aboriginal values ............................................................................................. 16 Key environmental assets................................................................................................. 17 Key economic and social assets....................................................................................... 17 Protecting basic landholder rights..................................................................................... 18 Other water sharing considerations .................................................................................. 18 i | NSW Office of Water, July 2011 Water Sharing Plan for the Greater Metropolitan Region Groundwater Sources – Background document Rules for groundwater sources ........................................................................................................... 19 Risk assessment approach to determining sustainable limits..................................................... 19 Recharge calculations................................................................................................................. 20 Risk assessment ......................................................................................................................... 22 Sustainability factor ..................................................................................................................... 22 Defining planned environmental water........................................................................................ 23 Annual rainfall recharge reserved in high environmental value areas.............................. 23 Annual rainfall recharge reserved in non-high environmental value areas....................... 23 Defining the long-term average annual extraction limit............................................................... 24 Water sharing rules ..................................................................................................................... 25 Managing extraction to the long-term average annual extraction limit ............................. 25 Unassigned water ............................................................................................................. 25 Aquifer interference........................................................................................................... 26 Protecting environmental values and groundwater dependent ecosystems .................... 27 Water supply works approvals .......................................................................................... 27 Managing connectivity and access rules .......................................................................... 28 Available water determinations......................................................................................... 29 Carryover and water accounts .......................................................................................... 29 Trading of access entitlement........................................................................................... 29 Consultation......................................................................................................................................... 30 Targeted consultation on the draft rules...................................................................................... 30 Refining water sharing rules as a result of targeted consultation and updated data .................. 31 Public exhibition of the draft water sharing plan ......................................................................... 31 Refining water sharing rules as a result of public exhibition and updated data.......................... 32 Adaptive management......................................................................................................................... 34 Monitoring of plan performance ..................................................................................................34 Performance indicators ............................................................................................................... 34 Plan review.................................................................................................................................. 34 Implementation .................................................................................................................................... 35 Implementation programs...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sydney Catchment Authority Appendices Appendices
    sydney catchment authority appendices appendices 1. Names and qualifications of SCA Board members 95 2. SCA Board attendances at meetings 96 3. Standing committees 96 4. Senior Executive qualifications 97 5. Principal legislation and regulation 97 6. Insurance 98 7. Legal change 98 8. Current legal matters 98 9. Freedom of Information applications and status 100 10. Summary of Affairs 101 11. Schedule of charges for regulated water supply services 102 12. Credit card usage 102 13. Engagement of consultants 103 14. Payment of accounts 103 15. Grants and incentives 104 16. Overseas visits by staff 104 17. Equal opportunity, training and development for staff 105 18. Significant committees established/abolished 105 19. Staff above SES level 5 105 20. Waste reduction and purchasing plan implementation 106 21. Guarantee of Service 106 22. Cost of Annual Report 107 23. Cultural heritage assets 107 24. Publications 108 94 Sydney Catchment Authority Annual Report 2003 - 2004 Sydney Catchment Authority Annual Report 2003 - 2004 95 appendicesAPPENDICESAPPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDICESAPPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDICES 1. Names and Qualifi cations executive positions with the EPA since financial advisory services and he acts as its inception. Prior to this, she held consultant to a number of state and federal of Board Members senior positions with the Ministry for the government departments. Accounting The Board’s membership changed during Environment, AWA Limited, Sydney Water and financial services are provided to 2003-04. The Minister appointed Lisa Board and the Department of Planning. She a diverse client base drawn from both Corbyn to the Board as the Sydney also worked for over 10 years with the US the private and public sectors, including Catchment Authority’s (SCA) Chief Environmental Protection Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Upland Swamps in the Sydney Basin - Likely to Occur Australia, 2006
    150°30'E 151°0'E 151°30'E Mogo Creek This map has been compiled from existing landscape scale datasets UNNAMED that do not specifically map the defined national ecological community Yarramalong (EC) and vary in scale and accuracy. Ground-truthing is required to verify the presence of the EC for site based projects, planning or investment decisions. Such decisions should refer to the text of the Conservation Advice at www.environment.gov.au/cgibin/ Peats sprat/public/sprat.pl Ridge Wyong For current information published by the Department on your area of interest youare advised to use the Protected Matters SeCaorlcoh Tool at www.environment.gov.au/epbc/pmst/index.html Heights Yengo LITTLE MOONEY Lower MOONEY Mangrove Gosford S S ' ' 0 0 3 3 ° ° 3 3 3 3 Pittwater Kurrajong Berowra Galston Terrey Hills Katoomba Pennant Hills Lane Cove Sydney Cumberland Wolli Creek S S ' ' 0 0 ° Kurnell ° 4 4 3 Minto 3 Heights Lucas Heights Campbelltown Bundeena LAKE BURRAGORANG WORONORA Waterfall Picton Helensburgh Appin Sydney Cataract LAKE CATARACT LAKE NEPEAN LAKE CORDEAUX Wollongong Mittagong LAKE AVON S S ' ' 0 0 3 Illawarra 3 ° ° 4 4 3 Moss 3 Vale Robertson 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 Approx. Kms 150°30'E 151°0'E 151°30'E Legend Source: Locality Coastal Upland Swamps Coastal Upland Swamps data supplied by David Keith, NSW DEH. Major roads Localities 1:250,000 © Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Australia, 2002. Drainage in the Sydney Basin Major roads 1:5,000,000 © Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Australia, 2002. Coastline and State Borders, 1:250,000 © Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Coastal Upland Swamps in the Sydney Basin - Likely to occur Australia, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Centuries of Botanical Exploration Along the Botanists Way, Northern Blue Mountains, N.S.W: a Regional Botanical History That Refl Ects National Trends
    Two Centuries of Botanical Exploration along the Botanists Way, Northern Blue Mountains, N.S.W: a Regional Botanical History that Refl ects National Trends DOUG BENSON Honorary Research Associate, National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney NSW 2000, AUSTRALIA. [email protected] Published on 10 April 2019 at https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/LIN/index Benson, D. (2019). Two centuries of botanical exploration along the Botanists Way, northern Blue Mountains,N.S.W: a regional botanical history that refl ects national trends. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 141, 1-24. The Botanists Way is a promotional concept developed by the Blue Mountains Botanic Garden at Mt Tomah for interpretation displays associated with the adjacent Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area (GBMWHA). It is based on 19th century botanical exploration of areas between Kurrajong and Bell, northwest of Sydney, generally associated with Bells Line of Road, and focussed particularly on the botanists George Caley and Allan Cunningham and their connections with Mt Tomah. Based on a broader assessment of the area’s botanical history, the concept is here expanded to cover the route from Richmond to Lithgow (about 80 km) including both Bells Line of Road and Chifl ey Road, and extending north to the Newnes Plateau. The historical attraction of botanists and collectors to the area is explored chronologically from 1804 up to the present, and themes suitable for visitor education are recognised. Though the Botanists Way is focused on a relatively limited geographic area, the general sequence of scientifi c activities described - initial exploratory collecting; 19th century Gentlemen Naturalists (and lady illustrators); learned societies and publications; 20th century publicly-supported research institutions and the beginnings of ecology, and since the 1960s, professional conservation research and management - were also happening nationally elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Sydney
    THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY Copyright and use of this thesis This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author -subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Copyright Service. sydney.edu.au/copyright A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN HORNSBY PLATEAU, SYDNEY BASIN, NEW SOUTH WALES by Anthony Richard Norman, B.Sc. (Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY September, 1986 ABSTRACT The Hornsby Plateau rises north of Sydney. Aerial photo interpretation of an area north of Hornsby and south of the Hawkesbury River revealed two well defined extensive traces.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of State Conservation Areas
    Review of State Conservation Areas Report of the first five-year review of State Conservation Areas under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 November 2008 Cover photos (clockwise from left): Trial Bay Goal, Arakoon SCA (DECC); Glenrock SCA (B. Peters, DECC); Banksia, Bent Basin SCA (M. Lauder, DECC); Glenrock SCA (B. Peters, DECC). © Copyright State of NSW and Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW. The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced for educational or non-commercial purposes in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978-1-74122-981-3 DECC 2008/516 November 2008 Printed on recycled paper Contents Minister’s Foreword iii Part 1 – State Conservations Areas 1 State Conservation Areas 4 Exploration and mining in NSW 6 History and current trends 6 Titles 7 Assessments 7 Compliance and rehabilitation 8 Renewals 8 Exploration and mining in State Conservation Areas 9 The five-year review 10 Purpose of the review 10
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Cove River Coastal Zone Management Plan
    A part of BMT in Energy and Environment "Where will our knowledge take you?" Lane Cove River Coastal Zone Management Plan Offices Prepared For: Lane Cove River Estuary Management Committee Brisbane (LCREMC), Hunters Hill Council, Lane Cove Council, Denver City of Ryde, Willoughby Councli Mackay Melbourne Newcastle Perth Prepared By: BMT WBM Pty Ltd (Member of the BMT group of Sydney companies) Vancouver Acknowledgement: LCREMC has prepared this document with financial assistance from the NSW Government through the Office of Environment and Heritage. This document does not necessarily represent the opinion of the NSW Government or the Office of Environment and Heritage. lANE COVE RIVER CZMP FINAL DRAFT DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET BMT WBM Pty Ltd Document : Lane Cove River CZMP FINAL BMT WBM Pty Ltd DRAFT Level 1, 256-258 Norton Street PO Box 194 Project Manager : Reid Butler LEICHHARDT NSW 2040 Australia Client : Lane Cove River Estuary Management Committee, Hunters Tel: +61 2 8987 2900 Hill Council, Lane Cove Council, Fax: +61 2 8987 2999 City of Ryde, Willoughby Council ABN 54 010 830 421 www.bmtwbm.com.au Client Contact: Susan Butler (Lane Cove Council) Client Reference: Lane Cove River CZMP Title : Lane Cove River Coastal Zone Management Plan Author/s : Reid Butler, Smita Jha Synopsis : This report provides a revised management plan for the Lane Cove River Estuary under the requirements of the NSW OEH Coastal Zone Management Planning Guidelines. REVISION/CHECKING HISTORY REVISION DATE OF ISSUE CHECKED BY ISSUED BY NUMBER 0 24/05/2012 SJ
    [Show full text]
  • BROOKLYN ESTUARY PROCESS STUDY (VOLUME I of II) By
    BROOKLYN ESTUARY PROCESS STUDY (VOLUME I OF II) by Water Research Laboratory Manly Hydraulics Laboratory The Ecology Lab Coastal and Marine Geosciences The Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities Edited by B M Miller and D Van Senden Technical Report 2002/20 June 2002 (Issued October 2003) THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WATER RESEARCH LABORATORY BROOKLYN ESTUARY PROCESS STUDY WRL Technical Report 2002/20 June 2002 by Water Research Laboratory Manly Hydraulics Laboratory The Ecology Lab Coastal and Marine Geosciences The Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities Edited by B M Miller D Van Senden (Issued October 2003) - i - Water Research Laboratory School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Technical Report No 2002/20 University of New South Wales ABN 57 195 873 179 Report Status Final King Street Date of Issue October 2003 Manly Vale NSW 2093 Australia Telephone: +61 (2) 9949 4488 WRL Project No. 00758 Facsimile: +61 (2) 9949 4188 Project Manager B M Miller Title BROOKLYN ESTUARY PROCESS STUDY Editor(s) B M Miller, D Van Senden Client Name Hornsby Shire Council Client Address PO Box 37 296 Pacific Highway HORNSBY NSW 1630 Client Contact Jacqui Grove Client Reference Major Involvement by: Brett Miller (WRL), David van Senden (MHL), William Glamore (WRL), Ainslie Fraser (WRL), Matt Chadwick (WRL), Peggy O'Donnell (TEL), Michele Widdowson (MHL), Bronson McPherson (MHL), Sophie Diller (TEL), Charmaine Bennett (TEL), John Hudson (CMG), Theresa Lasiak (CEICC) and Tony Underwood (CEICC). The work reported herein was carried out at the Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, acting on behalf of the client.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Geomorphology of Jenolan Caves and the Surrounding Region
    Geology and Geomorphology of Jenolan Caves and the Surrounding Region DAVID F. BRANAGAN1, JOHN PICKETT2 AND IAN G. PERCIVAL3 1Honorary Associate, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 ([email protected]); 2Honorary Associate, Geological Survey of NSW, WB Clarke Geoscience Centre, Londonderry NSW 2753 ([email protected]); 3Geological Survey of NSW, WB Clarke Geoscience Centre, Londonderry NSW 2753 ([email protected]) Published on 30 May 2014 at http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/LIN Branagan, D.F., Pickett, J.W. and Percival, I.G. (2014). Geology and Geomorphology of Jenolan Caves and the Surrounding Region. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 136, 99-130. Detailed mapping by university students and staff since the 1980s has significantly elucidated previously poorly known stratigraphic and structural relationships in the Jenolan Caves region. Apart from andesite of ?Ordovician age, rocks west of the caves probably correlate with the lower Silurian Campbells Group. That succession is faulted against the Silurian (mid Wenlockian) Jenolan Caves Limestone, in which caves developed during several episodes from the late Palaeozoic. Immediately east of Jenolan Caves, siliciclastic sedimentary and volcaniclastic rocks with interbedded silicic lavas constitute the newly defined Inspiration Point Formation, correlated with the upper Silurian to Lower Devonian Mount Fairy Group. Several prominent marker units are recognised, including limestone previously correlated with the main Jenolan limestone belt. Extensive strike-slip and thrust faulting disrupts the sequence, but in general the entire Silurian succession youngs to the east, so that beds apparently steeply-dipping westerly are actually overturned.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years Post-Wildfire Recovery and Health of Eucalypt
    Managing the Threat Program © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2010 Ten years post-wildfire recovery and health of Eucalypt forests and woodland in the Sydney Basin, Australia: Using remotely sensed vegetation indices Jessica Heath1*, Chris Chafer2, Tom Bishop1, Floris Van Ogtrop1 1 Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2 Sydney Catchment Authority, New South Wales *Contact details: [email protected] INTRODUCTION RESULTS The response of vegetation after a wildfire is •Figures 2-5 provide an example of the NDVI, NDVIc and NBR* for the Nattai subcatchment dependent on factors such as fire intensity and (1990/91- 2009/10), respectively. vegetation type. The majority of post-wildfire vegetation response studies conducted in Victoria, 1 NDVI •A obvious decline in the NDVI, NDVIc and NBR occurs at the time of wildfire (2001/2002 Australia, have been in communities dominated by 0.8 obligate seeders. These studies have found that there is summer). 0.6 a considerable delay in species germination due to a Extreme •The pattern of NDVI, NDVIc and NBR shows 0.4 Very high delay in water uptake by the seed bank. These studies High good vegetation recovery within two-three NDVI value 0.2 Moderate do not represent the response of vegetation in the Low years post-wildfire. Negliglible Sydney Basin, which is dominated by obligate 0 •NDVI, NDVIc and NBR patterns are similar to resprouter species. the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) (Fig. 5) and rainfall (Fig. 6) pattern during the study period. RESEARCH AIMS Fig 2. Nattai River subcatchment NDVI values To determine if vegetation in the Sydney Basin recovers NDIVc 0.7 0.8 NBR within 8 years post-wildfire.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUNDWATER SOURCES, MANAGEMENT ZONES & GROUNDWATER DEPENDENT ECOSYSTEMS MAP No: WSP015
    LOCALITY DIAGRAM LEGEND WATER SHARING PLAN BOUNDARY . GROUNDWATER SOURCE . MANAGEMENT ZONE . NSW HIGHWAY/MOTORWAY . MAIN ROAD . RIVER . M A C D O N A L B D o H! g POTENTIAL KARST GDE . Ettrema g y W o O ll v e e m k OTHER POTENTIAL GDEs k n i e s e e r e r C S ! C w ESTUARINE WETLAND. a m p Y ! e n FLOODPLAIN WETLAND. g reek o a C D b A o O C o R r ! lla g G ee E ie n i Cre k FRESHWATER LAKE . RTE b o rr ek CAPE r SYDNib EY BASIN NORTH m o u U o n g C C re SPRING . ! ek C re R ! e IV E k R SWAMP . k ee Cr C ! A S k WETLAND . T e L RI e E VER r R C E A G H o c Y o T C T Capertee U go Mo H!Valley P ! k H e H Nelungaloo e RIVER I r G C H W A Y AN LG O We W bbs St Albans SYDNEY BASIN | y C k c r o ee R k ok yo COXS RIVER a C N re e k CO C LO O SYDNEY BASIN H! X Wisemans Ferry S R Colo Heights Portland E V ri I boo C R ER nglRe ICHMOre ND RIV BURY Bu ek KES Lake HAW RMAROOTA TERTIARY SANDS Wallerawang Wallace IV . GOSFORD | ER k e WO re LLA Creek C NGA MBE R s E er LITHGOW y rm n V Fa hee I W R RO B OF AHD AWKESBURY E Lake LL Lyell S E | LIN ALLUVIUM Ca R H ttai I AW V KE k E SB e Broken Bay R UR GR GR Y re EAT O ! Longneck Lagoon C SE ER Y Y Mt Victoria RIV ! A A Richmond ! Long Swamp W W ek Pitt Town O H R ek re G O re C ha I T C WindsorLagoon ra H O s M C th r Blackheath or R e E e tw C n V k e I r e IC W W R e F E I k C 3 S A F T Blue Mountains P E ! k ra R e Mona Vale e w n N Sedge Swamps r a C ro Hornsby e w o AY B HW Penrith C L HIG KATOOMBA rook | IT Glenb Lakes CT OXS MOT O C RWAY METROPOLITAN L E re LA e N KE k E RIV DU GR ORWAY Manly ER MB Penrith EAT MOT RIVER A C Dam 2 J M COASTAL SANDS E WE Blacktown O N SYDNEY BASIN M ST V 4 E O MOTORWAY RN E C L HI O GH A N WAY X A FN RACRTURED 7 IV E E S R R M R P Chatswood E BLUI E MOUNTAINS V N PIPELINE H!Jenolan Y Reservoir E SYDNEY BASIN CENTRAL PPL SU n R R Parramatta WATE P o Jenolan ROCK ro s NEY sp k Caves e Ck SYD ec c SYDNEY in t a k J C Po HOLL rs rt AN E k D .
    [Show full text]
  • Oberon Council
    OBERON COUNCIL Local Strategic Planning Statement 2040 “Oberon – more than you imagine” Document Status Author Date Doc stage Rev No. 1 Oberon Council March 2020 Pre exhibition draft 2 Oberon Council May 2020 Exhibition draft 3 Oberon Council June 2020 Final i Mayor’s Foreword To develop a vision for land use for the next twenty years the Oberon Council Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS) considers land use trends that are currently occurring in the Local Government Area (LGA) and anticipates others that may likely emerge. The continued importance of agriculture, forestry, lifestyle and tourism is acknowledged and planning actions are included in this document to ensure ongoing viability in these areas. However we must also be cognisant of the fact that the use of agricultural land is changing across the country. Council is looking at planning strategies to increase employment opportunities in both the manufacturing and farming sectors through value adding and new development. Currently Oberon is enjoying popularity as a lifestyle option with many new residents choosing to move here and embrace our lifestyle. The LSPS looks to expand upon this trend and analyse what will be required to further enhance the popularity of Oberon whilst minimising risks to new residents posed by bushfire, flooding and other natural disasters. “Oberon – more than you imagine” is the vision of Council community strategic plan with the mission being “A prosperous town, village and rural communities set amongst the rolling hills, rivers, forests, mountains and caves of the Great Divide. Breathe fresh air in a landscape of light, colour and seasonal beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • March 9, 2021 Brenda Mallory Chair White House Council On
    March 9, 2021 Brenda Mallory Chair White House Council on Environmental Quality 730 Jackson Pl NW Washington, DC 20506 Via email Re: Utility disconnection moratorium for Tennessee Valley Authority Dear Ms. Mallory, Please find attached petitions signed by over 21,500 people from Tennessee and beyond urging the Tennessee Valley Authority to institute a utility shutoff moratorium throughout its service area. As the letters attached state, “Without electricity, people won’t be able to shelter in homes that are a safe temperature, support remote schooling for their kids, or refrigerate their medicines. It is a decision that literally has life-or-death consequences.” For several months throughout the pandemic, advocates have urged TVA to institute such a moratorium, but to no avail. We now call upon President Biden to act, by issuing an Executive Order directing TVA to keep people’s power on-- the only responsible option during a pandemic. Please also find attached a memo outlining the President’s authority to issue an Executive Order to this effect. Sincerely, Tom Cormons Executive Director Appalachian Voices Erich Pica President Friends of the Earth Cc: Gina McCarthy, White House National Security Advisor Representative Peter DeFazio, Chair, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Senator Tom Carper, Chair, Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Representative Frank Pallone, Chair, House Committee on Energy and Commerce Tennessee Congressional delegation Attachments: Executive Actions for Immediate COVID relief and economic recovery via the Tennessee Valley Authority, Appalachian Voices Appalachian Voices petition Appalachia Voices petition signatories Friends of the Earth petition Friends of the Earth petition signatories EXECUTIVE ACTIONS FOR IMMEDIATE COVID RELIEF AND ECONOMIC RECOVERY VIA THE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY The Tennessee Valley Authority was established in the 1930s by a federal mandate to bring flood relief, economic stimulus and improved quality of life to the people of the Tennessee Valley.
    [Show full text]