DOCSLIB.ORG

Svflux Tutorial Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Svflux Tutorial Manual 2D Slope Stability Modeling Software Tutorial Manual Written by: Murray Fredlund, Ph.D. Tiequn Feng, Ph.D. Robert Thode, B.Sc.G.E. Edited by: Murray Fredlund, Ph.D. SoilVision Systems Ltd. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Software License The software described in this manual is furnished under a license agreement. The software may be used or copied only in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Software Support Support for the software is furnished under the terms of a support agreement. Copyright Information contained within this Tutorial Manual is copyrighted and all rights are reserved by SoilVision Systems Ltd. The SVSLOPE software is a proprietary product and trade secret of SoilVision Systems. The Tutorial Manual may be reproduced or copied in whole or in part by the software licensee for use with running the software. The Tutorial Manual may not be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means for the purpose of selling the copies. Disclaimer of Warranty SoilVision Systems Ltd. reserves the right to make periodic modifications of this product without obligation to notify any person of such revision. SoilVision does not guarantee, warrant, or make any representation regarding the use of, or the results of, the programs in terms of correctness, accuracy, reliability, currentness, or otherwise; the user is expected to make the final evaluation in the context of his (her) own problems. Trademarks Windows™ is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation. SoilVision® is a registered trademark of SoilVision Systems Ltd. SVFLUX ™ is a trademark of SoilVision Systems Ltd. CHEMFLUX ™ is a trademark of SoilVision Systems Ltd. SVSOLID ™ is a trademark of SoilVision Systems Ltd. SVHEAT ™ is a trademark of SoilVision Systems Ltd. SVSLOPE ® is a registered trademark of SoilVision Systems Ltd. ACUMESH ™ is a trademark of SoilVision Systems Ltd. FlexPDE® is a registered trademark of PDE Solutions Inc. Copyright © 2013 by SoilVision Systems Ltd. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Printed in Canada Last Updated: May 20, 2013 Table of Contents 3 of 133 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 2 Authorization ............................................................................................................................. 6 3 Basic Slope ............................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Results and Disc..u..s..s..i.o...n..s............................................................................................................... 13 4 Weak Layer Example............................................................................................................................. 14 4.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 16 4.2 Results and Disc..u..s..s..i.o...n..s............................................................................................................... 20 5 Geomembrane Exam..p...l.e....................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 24 5.2 Results and Disc..u..s..s..i.o...n..s............................................................................................................... 29 6 Dynamic Programmi.n..g.. .E..x..a..m....p..l.e.......................................................................................................... 30 6.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 30 6.2 Results and Disc..u..s..s..i.o...n..s............................................................................................................... 39 7 Kulhawy Method ............................................................................................................................. 41 7.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 41 7.2 Results and Disc..u..s..s..i.o...n..s............................................................................................................... 43 8 2D Hong Kong Examp..l.e.......................................................................................................................... 45 8.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 46 8.2 Results and Disc..u..s..s..i.o...n................................................................................................................. 54 8.3 Model Data ............................................................................................................................. 56 9 2D Cannon Dam Exam....p..l.e...................................................................................................................... 62 9.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 62 9.2 Results and Disc..u..s..s..i.o...n................................................................................................................. 68 9.3 Model Data ............................................................................................................................. 69 10 2D Spatial Variabilit..y.. .E..x..a..m...p...l.e........................................................................................................... 71 10.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 71 10.2 Results and Dis..c..u..s..s..i..o..n............................................................................................................... 74 11 2D Two-Way Sensit.i.v..i.t..y.. .A...n..a..l.y..s..i.s...................................................................................................... 75 11.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 75 11.2 Results and Dis..c..u..s..s..i..o..n............................................................................................................... 78 12 3D Multi Planar Exa.m....p..l.e..................................................................................................................... 79 12.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 79 12.2 Results and Dis..c..u..s..s..i..o..n..s............................................................................................................. 85 13 3D Submergence Ex..a..m....p..l.e.................................................................................................................. 88 13.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 88 13.2 Results and Dis..c..u..s..s..i..o..n..s............................................................................................................. 95 14 3D General Sliding S..u...r.f..a..c.e.................................................................................................................. 98 14.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 99 14.2 Results and D.i.s..c..u...s..s..i.o..n............................................................................................................. 104 Table of Contents 4 of 133 15 2D Rapid Drawdow...n... .E..x..a..m...p...l.e......................................................................................................... 106 15.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 106 15.2 Results and D.i.s..c..u...s..s..i.o..n............................................................................................................. 111 15.3 Model Data ............................................................................................................................. 112 16 3D Rapid Drawdow...n... .E..x..a..m...p...l.e......................................................................................................... 114 16.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 114 16.2 Results and D.i.s..c..u...s..s..i.o..n............................................................................................................. 116 17 3D Arbitrary Slidin..g.. .D...i.r.e...c.t..i.o..n.......................................................................................................... 118 17.1 Model Setup ............................................................................................................................. 119 17.2 Results and D.i.s..c..u...s..s..i.o..n............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Numerical Study on the Hydrologic Characteristic of Permeable Friction Course Pavement
    water Article Numerical Study on the Hydrologic Characteristic of Permeable Friction Course Pavement Tan Hung Nguyen 1 and Jaehun Ahn 2,* 1 Faculty of Architectural, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nam Can Tho University, Can Tho 900000, Vietnam; [email protected] 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-51-510-7627 Abstract: The hydrologic characteristic of a permeable friction course (PFC) pavement is dependent on the rainfall intensity, pavement geometric design, and porous asphalt properties. Herein, the hydrologic characteristic of PFC pavements of various lengths and slopes was determined via numerical analysis. A series of analyses was conducted using length values of 10, 15, 20, and 30 m and slope values of 0.5%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% for the equivalent water flow path. The PFC pavements were simulated for various values of rainfall intensity, which ranged from 10 to 120 mm/h, to determine the time taken for water to flow over the PFC pavement surface. The results show that the time for water overflow decreased when the pavement length or rainfall intensity increased, and it increased when the slope increased. Finally, a series of design charts was developed to determine the time taken for water to flow over the PFC pavement surface for given rainfall intensities. Since this study was conducted based on numerical analysis, further studies are recommended to verify experimentally the results presented. Citation: Nguyen, T.H.; Ahn, J. Keywords: hydrologic characteristic; permeable friction course pavement; geometric design Numerical Study on the Hydrologic Characteristic of Permeable Friction Course Pavement.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoysynthetic Reinforced Embankment Slopes Akshay Kumar Jha and Madhav Madhira
    Chapter Geoysynthetic Reinforced Embankment Slopes Akshay Kumar Jha and Madhav Madhira Abstract Slope failures lead to loss of life and damage to property. Slope instability of natural slope depends on natural and manmade factors such as excessive rainfall, earthquakes, deforestation, unplanned construction activity, etc. Manmade slopes are formed for embankments and cuttings. Steepening of slopes for construc- tion of rail/road embankments or for widening of existing roads is a necessity for development. Use of geosynthetics for steep slope construction considering design and environmental aspects could be a viable alternative to these issues. Methods developed for unreinforced slopes have been extended to analyze geosynthetic reinforced slopes accounting for the presence of reinforcement. Designing geosyn- thetic reinforced slope with minimum length of geosynthetics leads to economy. This chapter presents review of literature and design methodologies available for reinforced slopes with granular and marginal backfills. Optimization of reinforce- ment length from face end of the slope and slope - reinforcement interactions are also presented. Keywords: slopes, geosynthetics, reinforcement, optimization of length, marginal soils, steepening 1. Introduction Landslides in slopes and failures of embankment and cut slopes lead to loss of life and property. Several factors, natural and manmade, such as heavy rainfall, unplanned construction, deforestation, restricting waterways of rivers and their tributaries are major causes for instability of slopes. Factors controlling stability of natural slopes are type of soil, environmental conditions, groundwater, stress history, rainfall, cloud burst, earthquakes, etc. Landslide mortality rate exceeds one per 100 km2 per year in developing countries like India, China, Nepal, Peru, Venezuela, Philippines and Tajikistan [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Precipitation on the Slope Stability of Landfills Gergő Albert1–Krisztina Beáta Faur2 INTRODUCTION
    Geosciences and Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 5 (2014), pp 155-163. Effect of precipitation on the slope stability of landfills Gergő Albert1–Krisztina Beáta Faur2 1MSc student - 2Department engineer;1,2Institute of Environmental Management, Department of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, H-3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Precipitation and pore water pressure increase can cause landslides not only on tropical climate, but also in Hungary. The determination of the effect of different amounts of precipitation is the main goal of this paper. The slope stability calculations were run by Soilvision’s coupled SVFlux and SVSlope modules. Due to the lack of knowledge of the input parameters several problem occurred by the evaluation of the results. Further investigation of the hydraulic and the geotechnical parameters of municipal solid wastes are suggested for more reliable calculations. INTRODUCTION Several large, sometimes fatal landfill failures in the world prove the effect of pore water pressure increase on slope stability. Since we have the opportunity to use the Soilvision software package, we tried to couple the SV Flux and the SV Slope modules to determine the effect of precipitation on landfills without cover systems (e.g. landfills under construction). The stability analysis of the failure (in February 2005) of the Leuwigajah dumpsite near Bandung, Indonesia proved that the failure most likely have been triggered by water pressure in the soft subsoil in combination with a severe damage of reinforcement particles due to a smoldering landfill fire. This result addresses a specific stability problem in tropical countries. Since precipitation is high (1500–2000 m per year), but non-uniform, both events may happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability-Based Optimization Design of Geosynthetic Reinforced Embankment Slopes
    Scholars' Mine Doctoral Dissertations Student Theses and Dissertations Summer 2015 Reliability-based optimization design of geosynthetic reinforced embankment slopes Michelle (Mingyan) Deng Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Department: Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Recommended Citation Deng, Michelle (Mingyan), "Reliability-based optimization design of geosynthetic reinforced embankment slopes" (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 2407. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations/2407 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION DESIGN OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED EMBANKMENT SLOPES by MICHELLE (MINGYAN) DENG A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in CIVIL ENGINEERING 2015 Approved Ronaldo Luna, Advisor Bate Bate Xiaoming He Norbert Maerz Cesar Mendoza © 2015 Michelle (Mingyan) Deng All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT This study examines the optimization design of geosynthetic reinforced embank- ment slopes (GRES) considering both economic benefits and technical safety require- ments. In engineering design, cost is always a big concern. To minimize the cost, engineers tend to seek an optimal combination of design parameters among the considered alterna- tives while ensuring the optimal solution is safe. Reliability-based optimization (RBO) is such a technique that provides engineers the optimal design with the minimum cost while all technical design requirements are satisfied.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Approach for Tunnel Support Design Through Q and Rmi Systems in Fractured Rock Mass
    applied sciences Article An Empirical Approach for Tunnel Support Design through Q and RMi Systems in Fractured Rock Mass Jaekook Lee 1, Hafeezur Rehman 1,2, Abdul Muntaqim Naji 1,3, Jung-Joo Kim 4 and Han-Kyu Yoo 1,* 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 426-791, Korea; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (H.R.); [email protected] (A.M.N.) 2 Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta 87300, Pakistan 3 Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta 87300, Pakistan 4 Korea Railroad Research Institute, 176 Cheoldobangmulgwan-ro, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do 16105, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-400-5147; Fax: +82-31-409-4104 Received: 26 November 2018; Accepted: 14 December 2018; Published: 18 December 2018 Abstract: Empirical systems for the classification of rock mass are used primarily for preliminary support design in tunneling. When applying the existing acceptable international systems for tunnel preliminary supports in high-stress environments, the tunneling quality index (Q) and the rock mass index (RMi) systems that are preferred over geomechanical classification due to the stress characterization parameters that are incorporated into the two systems. However, these two systems are not appropriate when applied in a location where the rock is jointed and experiencing high stresses. This paper empirically extends the application of the two systems to tunnel support design in excavations in such locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity Study of Different Parameters Affecting Design of the Clay Blanket in Small Earthen Dams
    Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences Volume 48, No. 2, 2015 pp.139-147 Sensitivity study of different parameters affecting design of the clay blanket in small earthen dams Ishtiaq Alam and Irshad Ahmad Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan. Abstract Dams are structures that retain water for human services. Dams may be earthen, concrete, timber, steel or masonry made. On the basis of size, they may be small, medium and large. The main purpose of a dam is to divert the flow of water for the intended use. Flow of water cannot be stopped permanently even by the best dam ever made. Water may seep from dam body, abutments or the foundation bed below the body of the dam. To control seepage from the foundation bed, certain available methods like cutoff trench, cutoff walls, diaphragms, grout curtains, sheet pile walls and upstream impervious blankets are used. Upstream impervious blankets are considered more economical compared with the other methods mentioned above. The key parameters playing role in blanket efficiency are length of blanket, thickness of blanket, clay core width of the dam, foundation bed depth up to impervious zone, reservoir head, permeability of blanket material and permeability of bed material. This study is focused on the effect of these parameters in seepage control. Seep/W, a finite element method based software is used to model all the mentioned parameters within the individually selected ranges. The results based on the software analysis show that when the length of blanket is gradually increased, the seepage quantity reduces gradually until a specific length where the effect of further increase in length become meaningless.
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Determination of Field Suction Values, Hydraulic Properties, August 2005; Revised March 2007 and Shear Strength in High PI Clays 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jorge G. Zornberg, Jeffrey Kuhn, and Stephen Wright 0-5202-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5202 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2004–August 2006 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Determination of Field Suction Values in High PI Clays for Various Surface Conditions and Drain Installations 16. Abstract Moisture infiltration into highway embankments constructed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) using high Plasticity Index (PI) clays results in changes in shear strength and in flow pattern that leads to recurrent slope failures. In addition, soil cracking over time increases the rate of moisture infiltration. The overall objective of this research is to determine the suction, hydraulic properties, and shear strength of high PI Texas clays. Specifically, two comprehensive experimental programs involving the characterization of unsaturated properties and the shear strength of a high PI clay (Eagle Ford clay) were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Soil Dilatancy
    The Influence of Grain Shape on Dilatancy Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Cox, Melissa Reiko Brooke Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 03:25:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195563 THE INFLUENCE OF GRAIN SHAPE ON DILATANCY by MELISSA REIKO BROOKE COX ________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN CIVIL ENGINEERING In the Graduate College THE UNIVERISTY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 8 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Melissa Reiko Brooke Cox entitled The Influence of Grain Shape on Dilatancy and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Muniram Budhu ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Achintya Haldar ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Chandrakant S. Desai ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 John M. Kemeny Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics
    Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics Shear Strength of Soils Ability of soil to resist sliding on itself on the slope Angle of Repose definition n1. the maximum angle to the horizontal at which rocks, soil, etc, will remain without sliding Shear Strength Parameters and Soils Info Φ angle of internal friction C cohesion (clays are cohesive and sands are non-cohesive) Θ slope angle γ unit weight of soil Internal Angles of Friction Estimates for our use in example Silty sand Φ = 25 degrees Loose sand Φ = 30 degrees Medium to Dense sand Φ = 35 degrees Rock Riprap Φ = 40 degrees Slope Stability Analysis Basics Explore Site Geology Characterize soil shear strength Construct slope stability model Establish seepage and groundwater conditions Select loading condition Locate critical failure surface Iterate until minimum Factor of Safety (FS) is achieved Rules of Thumb and “Easy” Method of Estimating Slope Stability Geology and Soils Information Needed (from site or soils database) Check appropriate loading conditions (seeps, rapid drawdown, fluctuating water levels, flows) Select values to input for Φ and C Locate water table in slope (critical for evaluation!) 2:1 slopes are typically stable for less than 15 foot heights Note whether or not existing slopes are vegetated and stable Plan for a factor of safety (hazards evaluation) FS between 1.4 and 1.5 is typically adequate for our purposes No Flow Slope Stability Analysis FS = tan Φ / tan Θ Where Φ is the effective
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Sciences Software Guide
    Table of Contents In The Name Of God the Compassionate the Merciful ! "#$% Application of Computers in Water-Sciences :&' ' ) #* Seyyed Javad Hoseiny : +, #./ +- Dr. Mhohamad Aflatuni 84 ) ' August 2005 219 3 -01 ! "#$% ,2/ " +, 34 5 6/ Table of Contents 1 Special Thanks 4 1 2 Abstract 5 2 3 Suggestions 6 3 4 Reason of Importance 7 4 5 Similar Researches 8 5 Detailed Guide for The First 6 9 #$% &' 12 !" # 6 Top 12 Software 7 Where to Find the Software 32 +,) # #$% &' () * 7 8 Software-Course List 33 /# .#$% &' -% 8 9 Rating Method 56 0# 1# 9 10 Initials & Expressions 58 23456 #!78 ,94 10 11 Full Software List 59 ,2/ " 7 6/ 11 12 CD Introduction 201 - %: 12 13 Website Introduction 202 - %: 13 To Those Who Are Whishing to # ;<4 0= >< 14 Continue Researching in This Field 204 14 * ? 15 Contact Us 205 / 15 16 Refrences and Resources 206 @8A B 16 17 What Do You Say? 218 + =C D 17 219 4 -01 ! "#$% ,2/ " +, 8 ' 9' Special Thanks ,' =8 =' #= #= , # # E ;= 'F=G H ? # ) &)D # 8 :;= - =: 3 # * ) (# 7-) '=G4% 7) . (* D N' *#) ' 7-) 2HL ,M' ":0 7) . 7D# # 7) =(' . 5< 5< O4 P=QH #@N' ) #= ,-< 1='% / . (;LS.;-# 7:6 N' R=L#=Q7# =7 7H' R=L# (; * # S 7 )) 'H3 * / . ( L7- Griffith N' 7-) Graham Jenkins 7) . (; /# N' 7-) ,: =0 7) . (VS - E.#- N' 7-) 3 #U T L8 7) . (S Utah State N' # S 7-) Wynn R. Walker 7) . ., # '#< ' Back to Contents 219 5 -01 ! "#$% ,2/ " +, :9-' 8; Abstract '# [7E #) VS &= ;XU36 ;-D#) Y;=(' ;) DS ? * Z .- E ? \ )S *=3 # =T= UG
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Modeling in Geoenvironmental Practice
    Numerical Modeling in Geoenvironmental Practice By Craig H. Benson, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE o deling o f non-linear systems is now a regular Software Resources part of geoenvironmental engineering practice M due to Lh e ava il ability of inexpensive, high-speed A variety of powerful codes are available. The most PCs that utilize user-friendly software and graphical user common codes used for analysis o f vadose zone hydrol­ interfaces. Robust and effici ent solvers for no n-linear par­ ogy and unsaturated flow are 1-JYDRUS (www.pc-progress. lial d ifferential equations have also had a major irnpact com), UNSAT-H. (www.hydrology.pnl.gov or www.uwgeo on the practicality of geoenvironmental software packages. soft.org), VADOSE/W (www.geoslope.com), SEEP/W (www. Consequentl y, detailed analyses are being done in practice geoslope.corn), and SVFLUX (www.soilvision.com). that were not possible a decade ago. These include realistic HYDRUS is the most cornmonly used code in vadose zone assessrn ents of potential perfo rrn ance as well as "what if" hydrology worldwide, and can also be used to simulate scenarios. The rnost common analyses are associated with heat flow and contarninant transport in unsaturated rn edia. vadose-zone hydrology to predict the movement of water Other software packages cornrnonly used for contaminant in the vadose zone and i nteractions with the atmosphere. transpo 11 sirnulation in va riably saturated media include However, contarninant transport analyses in variably satu­ CTRAN/W (www.geoslope.com), CHEMFLUX (www.so il rated systerns are also becorning cornmonplace.
    [Show full text]
  • SVSLOPE® Support for Multi-Plane Analysis (MPA™)
    PRODUCT DATA SHEET SVSLOPE® Support for Multi-Plane Analysis (MPA™) SVSLOPE is the most advanced 3D slope stability analysis and slip surface search methods. The entire plane configuration process is designed so software available, with advanced searching methods that it is quick to perform on one or many planes at once. For example, the slope limits that are implemented to correctly determine the location may be defined for all planes at once by simply drawing a polygon that encloses the of the critical slip surface. The software provides you with area of interest on the 3D model. The slip surface search method is then automated, powerful 2D or 3D analysis for increased accuracy when with some options available to the user. calculating the factor of safety. Advanced probabilistic analysis or accommodation of spatial variation is possible Although there are multiple ways to create planes, the most common one, which with the software. SVSLOPE can be combined with was used in this case, is to simply select a point on each of the two banks. Planes SVFLUX™ to import pore-water pressures or SVSOLID™GT are then created along the slope automatically, at configurable distance intervals. to import soil stress conditions. The direction for each plane is automatically set based on the surface geometry. Each plane can be set to use multiple similar directions so that the critical direction Design and Analyze Different Locations Simultaneously is more likely to be found. Slope stability analysis is often targeted at topographically complex sites with features that vary greatly in three dimensions, or seemingly simple Results Collected and Aggregated into the Original 3D Model surface topology with strong and weak internal layers that vary across the for Visualization site.
    [Show full text]