DOCSLIB.ORG

Paper-11 SOCIOLOGY of HEALTH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paper-11 SOCIOLOGY of HEALTH MA Sociology Paper‐XI SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH Author Suvashree Behera Sociology of Health Unit‐I: Sociology of Health: its aim & scope, Contribution of Sociology to Health, Definition of Health & Illness‐ Four Dimensions of Health and Evolution of Social medicine in India . Unit‐I 1.0. Objectives of the Unit 1.1. Sociology of Health: an introduction 1.2. Aim and Scope 1.2.1 The social basis of health, illness and medicine 1.2.1.1 Bio‐chemical model versus Holistic approach 1.2.1.2 The relationship between society and individual 1.2.1.3 Class and health inequalities 1.2.1.4 Ethnicity, race and health 1.2.1.5 Gender and health 1.2.2 Mental health 1.2.2.1 Mental illness 1.2.2.2 Stigma 1.2.2.3 Ethnicity and mental health 1.2.2.4 Gender and mental health 1.3 Theoretical approaches 1.4 Contribution of sociology to health 1.4.1 Health promotion and sociology 1.4.2 Mental health roots 1.4.3 Some Contributions of Medical Sociology 1.4.4 Medical education 1.4.5 Medical sociology and physicians 1.4.6 Some of other major contributions of the sociology of health and illness 1.5 The Future of Medical Sociology 1.6 Definition of Health & Illness 1.6.1 Health: a global survey 1.6.1.1 Health in history 1.6.1.2 Health in low‐income countries 1.6.1.3 Health in high‐income countries 1.6.2 Current inequalities in health 1.6.3 Sociological Perspective on Health 1.6.4 The determinants of health 1.6.5 Policies to improve health 1.7 Four Dimensions of Health 1.8 Evolution of Social medicine in India 1.8.1 What is Social Medicine? Meaning and scope 1.8.2 Genesis and evolution of social medicine 1.8.3: Development of preventive and social medicine 1.8.4 Challenges 1.9. Summary 1.10. Key words 1.11. Further Readings 1.0.Objectives of the Unit: The main objective of this unit is to inform the readers about the basic idea on Health Sociology. After the completion of studying this unit the students will gain some fundamental knowledge on the following topics: Meaning, aim, objectives and scope of Health Sociology. Major theoretical approaches to health sociology. The concept of health and illness and different social determinates of health and illness. Major contributions of health sociology. Social Medicine‐ Its Evolution and development. 1.1 Sociology of Health: an introduction Over the last decade the promotion of health has become a central feature of health policy at local, national and international levels, forming part of global health initiatives such as those endorsed by the World Health Organization. At the same time a concern with ‘healthy living’ has become a preoccupation for many people. The Sociology of Health Promotion responds by offering the first critical sociological account of these developments and locates them within a set of wider socio‐cultural changes associated with late modernism. The Sociology of Health offers analyses of contemporary public health policy, lifestyle, consumption, risk and health. It also examines socio‐political critiques of health promotion and reflects upon their implications for policy and practice, the impact of both morbidity on social life and social life on morbidity. Diseases and conditions once attributed mainly to genetic predispositions are increasingly being looked at under a more global microscope with factors such as family, education, religion and economic standing all playing key roles in understanding the issue at hand. The history of HIV/Aids illustrates a prime example of how sociological factors affect health. The disease is thought to have originated in Sub‐Saharan Africa, where 69% of the world’s HIV/Aids cases currently exist, making heritage an important component to consider. However, there are even more sociological circumstances that contribute to the plethora of HIV/Aids victims in this area of the world. Female genital mutilation, an unfortunate cultural norm in parts of Africa, is conducive to the exchange of blood during sexual intercourse. Additionally, interference by religious activists often prevents any hope for promoting safe‐sex campaigns. Even major political figures in Africa have been known to cling strongly to AIDS‐denialist claims. This ignorant standpoint places a society that is already intensely prone to contracting the disease in an even more uneducated position. The positive side to discovering the influence of sociological factors on disease is that it provides us with further insight to humanity’s core issues and obstacles. When not adequately paid attention to, however, knowledge can be a double‐edged sword. For instance, when HIV/Aids first emerged in the US in the 1980s, it was feared but also believed to solely infect the homosexual and/or African American communities. Though these groups do often dominate statistics, HIV/Aids have actually been on the rise significantly in heterosexual females as of late. So, though the stigma and fear of HIV/Aids still exists in the US, the invention of new medicines and the spotlight on stereotypical victims sometimes make it not as prominent a concern as it should be for others who could still be infected. As we progress as a society, it is vital that we fully acknowledge potential health risks and make a joint effort to share and spread preventative knowledge. Health is a state of complete well‐being: physical, mental, and emotional. This definition emphasizes the importance of being more than disease free, and recognizes that a healthy body depends upon a healthy environment and a stable mind. Medicine is the social institution that diagnoses, treats, and prevents disease. To accomplish these tasks, medicine depends upon most other sciences—including life and earth sciences, chemistry, physics, and engineering. Preventive medicine is a more recent approach to medicine, which emphasizes health habits that prevent disease, including eating a healthier diet, getting adequate exercise etc. The sociology of health and illness studies the interaction between society and health. In particular, sociologists examine how social life impacts morbidity and mortality rates and how morbidity and mortality rates impact society. This discipline also looks at health and illness in relation to social institutions such as the family, work, school, and religion as well as the causes of disease and illness, reasons for seeking particular types of care, and patient compliance and noncompliance. Health, or lack of health, was once merely attributed to biological or natural conditions. Sociologists have demonstrated that the spread of diseases is heavily influenced by the socioeconomic status of individuals, ethnic traditions or beliefs, and other cultural factors. Where medical research might gather statistics on a disease, a sociological perspective of an illness would provide insight on what external factors caused the demographics that contracted the disease to become ill. The sociology of health and illness requires a global approach of analysis because the influence of societal factors varies throughout the world. Diseases are examined and compared based on the traditional medicine, economics, religion, and culture that are specific to each region. For example, HIV/AIDS serves as a common basis of comparison among regions. While it is extremely problematic in certain areas, in others it has affected a relatively small percentage of the population. Sociological factors can help to explain why these discrepancies exist. Moreover, there are obvious differences in patterns of health and illness across societies, over time, and within particular society types. There has historically been a long‐term decline in mortality within industrialized societies, and on average, life‐expectancies are considerably higher in developed, rather than developing or undeveloped, societies. Patterns of global change in health care systems make it more imperative than ever to research and comprehend the sociology of health and illness. Continuous changes in economy, therapy, technology and insurance can affect the way individual communities view and respond to the medical care available. These rapid fluctuations cause the issue of health and illness within social life to be very dynamic in definition. Advancing information is vital because as patterns evolve, the study of the sociology of health and illness constantly needs to be updated. 1.2 Aim and Scope: 1.2.1 The social basis of health, illness and medicine 1.2.1.1 Bio‐chemical model versus Holistic approach Health and illness are, surely, simply biological descriptions of the state of our bodies. When we’re ill, we’re ill. A more refined version of this common‐sense view underlies the long‐standing biomedical model of disease, which is based on the following assumptions: Disease is an organic condition: non‐organic factors associated with the human mind are considered unimportant or are ignored altogether in the search for biological causes of pathological symptoms. Disease is a temporary organic state that can be eradicated – cured – by medical intervention. Disease is experienced by a sick individual, who then becomes the object of treatment. Disease is treated after the symptoms appear – the application of medicine is a reactive healing process. Disease is treated in a medical environment – a surgery or a hospital – away from the site where the symptoms first appeared. This model has dominated medical practice because it has been seen to work. It is based on a technically powerful science that has made a massive contribution to key areas of health (for example, vaccination). The anatomical and neurophysiologic structures of the body have been mapped out, and the genetic mapping of the body is being undertaken through the Human Genome Project. The search for the fundamental – that is, genetic – basis of human pathology is on, whether the target is cancer, AIDS or Alzheimer’s disease.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Urban Hospitals As Anchor Institutions: Frameworks for Medical Sociology
    SRDXXX10.1177/2378023118817981SociusFranz et al. 817981research-article2018 Original Article Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World Volume 5: 1 –10 © The Author(s) 2019 Urban Hospitals as Anchor Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions Institutions: Frameworks for DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118817981 10.1177/2378023118817981 Medical Sociology srd.sagepub.com Berkeley Franz1, Daniel Skinner2, Jonathan Wynn3, and Kelly Kelleher4 Abstract Recent policy developments are forcing many hospitals to supplement their traditional focus on the provision of direct patient care by using mechanisms to address the social determinants of health in local communities. Sociologists have studied hospital organizations for decades, to great effect, highlighting key processes of professional socialization and external influences that shape hospital-based care. New methods are needed, however, to capture more recent changes in hospital population health initiatives in their surrounding neighborhoods. The authors describe three promising sociological frameworks for studying the changing hospital: (1) the study of professions, (2) social network analysis, and (3) community-based participatory research. The authors argue that future analyses of hospitals and health outcomes must move beyond the internal-external dichotomy to see hospitals as complex institutions that are increasingly entwined with communities and subject to changes in state regulation. Keywords social science, hospital, population health, research methods,
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Report on Hospitals
    2000 Report on Hospitals Licensed by Mississippi State Department of Health Division of Health Facilities Licensure and Certification 2000 Report on Hospitals Licensed by Mississippi State Department of Health P.O. Box 1700 Jackson, Mississippi 39216 Published June 2001 Health Facilities Licensure and Certification Vanessa Phipps, Chief and Public Health Statistics Judy Moulder, Director Table of Contents Page Preface..............................................................i Map I Distribution of Mississippi Hospitals by Type of Facility and County.................................1 Table I-A Number of Acute Care Hospitals and Beds in Mississippi by Type of Ownership and Control in 2000...............................................2 Table I-B Number of Psychiatric Hospitals and Beds in Mississippi by Type of Ownership and Control in 2000................................................3 Table I-C Number of Chemical Dependency Hospitals and Beds in Mississippi by Type of Ownership and Control in 2000................................................4 Table I-D Number of Rehabilitation Hospitals and Beds in Mississippi by Type of Ownership and Control in 2000................................................5 Table II Accreditations and Certifications of Mississippi Hospitals, 1990, 1995 and 2000..,...................6 Table III 2000 Staffing of All Mississippi Hospitals by Type....7 Map II Hospital Service Area Map.............................8 Table IV-A Computed Tomographic Body Procedures by Hospital Service Area in 2000................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Hospital Emergency Services Inventory
    Agency For Health Care Administration 9/1/2021 2:03 PM Hospital ER Services License Provider Name County Number No Emergency Room Services Dedicated Emergency Department Anesthesia Burn Cardiology Cardiovascular Surgery Colon & Rectal Surgery Emergency Medicine Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Surgery Gynecology Hematology Hyperbaric Medicine Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Neurosurgery Obstetrics Ophthalmology Oral/Maxillo-Facial Surgery Orthopedics Otolaryngology Plastic Surgery Podiatry Psychiatry Pulmonary Medicine Radiology Thoracic Surgery Urology Vascular Surgery Level 1 Trauma Center Level 2 Trauma Center Pediatric Trauma Center Provisional Level 1 Trauma Center Provisional Level 2 Trauma Center Provisional Pediatric Trauma Center 4247 NORTH FLORIDA REGIONAL ALACHUA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MEDICAL CENTER 4489 SELECT SPECIALTY ALACHUA X HOSPITAL GAINESVILLE 4529 UF HEALTH REHAB ALACHUA X HOSPITAL 4286 UF HEALTH SHANDS ALACHUA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X HOSPITAL 4286 UF HEALTH SHANDS ALACHUA X PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL 4152 ED FRASER MEMORIAL BAKER X X X HOSPITAL 4004 NORTHEAST FLORIDA BAKER X STATE HOSPITAL 3982 ASCENSION SACRED HEART BAY X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X BAY 4500 EMERALD COAST BAY X BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL 4458 ENCOMPASS HEALTH BAY X REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF PANAMA CITY 4337 GULF COAST REGIONAL BAY X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MEDICAL CENTER 4475 SELECT SPECIALTY BAY X HOSPITAL - PANAMA CITY
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Regional Hospital Authority
    Norman Regional Hospital Authority Independent Auditor’s Reports and Financial Statements June 30, 2020 and 2019 Norman Regional Hospital Authority June 30, 2020 and 2019 Contents Independent Auditor’s Report ......................................................................................................... 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ..................................................................................... 3 Financial Statements Balance Sheets .................................................................................................................................... 9 Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position ................................................... 10 Statements of Cash Flows ................................................................................................................ 11 Notes to Financial Statements .......................................................................................................... 12 Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios .................................................. 49 Schedule of Authority Contributions ................................................................................................ 50 Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards – Independent Auditor’s Report ................................. 51 Schedule
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Hospital Diversion Policy Section: Operational Policies Polcy Number: 07-003 Date Issused: August 1, 2004 Reviewed: 06-17-15
    Regional Hospital Diversion Policy Section: Operational Policies Polcy Number: 07-003 Date Issused: August 1, 2004 Reviewed: 06-17-15 I. Indications: a. Hospital equipment failure b. Internal disaster(ER only effected) c. Hospital disaster(entire hospital effected) II. Policy: Stable patients should generally be transported to the hospital of their choice, unless otherwise stated in the agency’s written standard operating procedures. Diversion to another hospital may become necessary only for the indications listed above. Patients will not be diverted due to a crowded ER, lack of Critical Care beds, or lack of a specialty service / physician. The receiving facility will accept the patient, stabilize as needed, and then arrange for appropriate transport to another facility if required. It is not appropriate to hold or delay EMS crews to receive a patient turnover or to re- transport to another facility. In the event that any 2 hospital ERs are closed due to an internal disaster, the MCI Coordinating Hospital system will be instituted. The Coordinating Hospital is Sentara Careplex on odd numbered months and Riverside Regional on even numbered months. When on diversion roll call all peninsula EMS units are to contact the Coordinating Hospital on the COR system (either via radio, cell, or landline) with the patient report. On line Medical Control will determine the most appropriate hospital to receive the patient and the EMS unit will then contact that receiving hospital to give a patient report. III. Procedure: WebEOC shall be used for diversion. a. WebEOC Description i. WebEOC is a web-based program providing real-time information on hospital emergency department status, hospital patient capacity, availability of staffed beds and available specialized treatment capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Sociology Newsletter
    Volume 45, Issue 1 Page 1 Medical Sociology Newsletter VOLUME 45, ISSUE 1 FALL 2008 A Publication of the Medical Sociology Section of the ASA NOTES FROM THE NEW CHAIR By Janet Hankin I am honored to serve as the Chair of the Medical Sociology Section as we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the founding of the section. Samuel W. Bloom recounts the establishment of the section in The Word as Scalpel: A History of Medical Sociology. The council of the American Sociological Society (now the American Sociological Association) approved the formation of the Section on Reminders: Medical Sociology in September 1959. By January 1960, the section had 407 members. A.B. Hollingshead was Chair, Odin Anderson served as Chair-Elect, and MSN Winter Deadline: Samuel Bloom was Secretary-Treasurer. Everett Hughes, George Reeder (a January 9, 2009 physician), and Benjamin Paul (an anthropologist) were council members. 2009 ASA Annual Meeting: From that auspicious beginning, our section has swelled to over 1,000 August 8-11, 2009 members, thanks to our outgoing and incoming membership chairs, Jennifer Foskett, San Francisco, California Heather Turner, and other section members who helped with our last minute 2010 ASA Annual Meeting membership appeal. I have planned six sessions to celebrate our golden anniversary. August 14-17, 2010 The sessions, as described elsewhere in this newsletter (Editor‘s note: see page 2), highlight a common theme: Fifty Years of Medical Sociology: Contributions and Atlanta, Georgia New Directions. I encourage you to submit papers to the section organizers for the San Francisco meetings. Mark your calendars for the 2009 meetings! Our section day will be the first day of the ASA meetings, Saturday, August 8th.
    [Show full text]
  • PATIENT GUIDE Copyright © 2018 Norman Regional Health System to Reorder Call 307-1170
    NORMAN REGIONAL 901 N. Porter Avenue, Norman, OK 73071 405.307.1000 • NormanRegional.com PATIENT GUIDE Copyright © 2018 Norman Regional Health System To reorder call 307-1170. TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from our President 1 COMMUNICATIONS Mission & Vision 2 Online Access 10 Online Health Newsletter 10 PHONE DIRECTORY Keep In Touch 10 Norman Regional Hospital 3 Support Groups and Classes 10 YOUR CARE Non-Discrimination Statement 10 Emergencies: Dial 88 4 VISITORS Speak Up About Your Care 4 Visitor Guidelines 11 Language and TDD Services 4 Visitor Entrances 11 Advanced Directive 4-5 Parking 12 Tobacco-Free Campus 5 Hospitality House 12 iCare 5 Guardian Angel Program 5-6 SERVICES Case Management 13 YOUR ROOM Giving Tree Gift Shop 13 During Your Stay 7 Pastoral Care 13 Television 7 Volunteer Services 13 Telephone 7 Consumer Health 13 Cell Phone 7 Information Outgoing Calls 7 Home Run Van 14 Courtesy Telephone 8 Home Medical Equipment 14 Incoming Calls 8 Before You Leave 8 FINANCE Patient Advisors 15 DINING Financial Services 15-17 Cafeteria Hours 9 Daily Grind Coffee Shop 9 SAFETY Guest Meal Trays 9 Patient Safety 18-19 Vending Machines 9 Security 19 National Safety Goals 19 FROM OUR PRESIDENT Welcome to Norman Regional Hospital Thank you for choosing Norman Regional Health System for your healthcare needs. Our staff of qualified physicians and medical professionals is dedicated to providing the highest-quality, personalized care in a respectful, courteous and timely manner. Norman Regional Hospital is equipped with the technology that will meet your healthcare needs and afford you the best of care.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement by and Between Washington State
    Collective Bargaining Agreement by and between Washington State Nurses Association and Pullman Regional Hospital Pullman, Washington OCTOBER 1, 2019 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1 – RECOGNITION ..........................................................................................1 ARTICLE 2 – PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT ..........................................................1 ARTICLE 3 – DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................1 3.1 Resident Nurse .............................................................................................1 3.2 Staff RN .......................................................................................................1 3.3 Charge RN ...................................................................................................1 3.4 Full-time RN ................................................................................................2 3.5 Part-time RN ................................................................................................2 3.6 Supplemental RN .........................................................................................2 3.7 Preceptor ......................................................................................................2 ARTICLE 4 – NON-DISCRIMINATION ..........................................................................2 ARTICLE 5 – NURSES’ PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY ......................................3 5.2 Association Membership .............................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Hospital Ownership in California
    Changes in Hospital Ownership in California ••• Joanne Spetz Jean Ann Seago Shannon Mitchell 1999 PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA Foreword Californians are understandably concerned about rapid changes in the health care industry. One concern that has prompted state legislation is the increased merger activity between for-profit and nonprofit hospitals. Many critics view the potential decline of nonprofit hospitals as another restriction on choice in health care. In response to this concern, Joanne Spetz and her colleagues Jean Ann Seago and Shannon Mitchell have undertaken a careful study of the state’s hospital mergers and their consequences. Their findings indicate that nonprofit hospitals are in no danger of extinction. About 80 percent of hospital mergers and acquisitions between 1986 and 1996 did not involve any change in the profit status of the hospitals. The remaining mergers were almost equally divided between conversions to for-profit and to nonprofit status. Although these mergers have not altered the overall balance between for-profit and nonprofit hospitals, they have raised new concerns about the concentration of hospital ownership in California. At least half of the iii state’s hospitals are now affiliated with multi-site hospital corporations, and the six largest firms in the state operate over one-third of its hospitals. The three largest hospital firms in both Sacramento and San Diego control more than 60 percent of the beds. Although hospital ownership is less concentrated in the Los Angeles and San Francisco metropolitan areas, both markets are far more consolidated than they were ten years ago. With these patterns in mind, the authors plan to continue their study of ownership changes and their consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • I. INTRODUCTION A. History and Background Of
    I. INTRODUCTION A. History and Background of The Cleveland Clinic Foundation A brief history of The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (“CCF” or “Cleveland Clinic”) is necessary to provide background and context for the materials that follow. The Cleveland Clinic was founded in 1921 in Cleveland, Ohio by four physicians who envisioned a group practice in which individual members would share clinical expertise and specialization and dedicate themselves to the education of future medical practitioners, and where innovations in medical procedures and practices would be encouraged through basic and applied research activities. The Cleveland Clinic began with a staff of six surgeons, one radiologist, four internists and one biophysicist. As early as 1921, they recognized that medicine was far too complex for any one person to fully comprehend and that it would be in the best interests of patients if the resources and talents of multiple specialties were pooled for the development and application of the best medical techniques. The four founders also envisioned a corporate structure that would support their vision and one which involved the oversight and direction by a separate board of community trustees in matters unrelated to patient and medical practice issues. The original clinic facility was located on the near east side of Cleveland, in the area where the main campus of CCF is located today. In 1924, CCF opened its first hospital on property near the original clinic facility. To this day, although larger and broader in scope, CCF continues to operate as an integrated and cooperative group practice, as an academic medical center and as an active research institute.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medical Sociologists' Contribution to the Interdisciplinary Geriatric Assessment Unit: a Sociology "With" Medicine*
    Sociological Practice Volume 11 Issue 1 Social Gerontology: The Linkage of Sociological Article 17 Knowledge and Practice January 1993 The edicM al Sociologists' Contribution to the Interdisciplinary Geriatric Assessment Unit: A Sociology "With" Medicine Jeffrey Michael Clair University of Alabama at Birmingham Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/socprac Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Clair, Jeffrey Michael (1993) "The eM dical Sociologists' Contribution to the Interdisciplinary Geriatric Assessment Unit: A Sociology "With" Medicine," Sociological Practice: Vol. 11: Iss. 1, Article 17. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/socprac/vol11/iss1/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociological Practice by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. The edicM al Sociologists' Contribution to the Interdisciplinary Geriatric Assessment Unit: A Sociology "With" Medicine Cover Page Footnote Author's Note: This paper was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation/American Sociological Association Fund for the Advancement of the Discipline, and the AARP Andrus Foundation. The author would like to thank Richard M. Allman, Elizabeth Clark, William C. Cockerham, Jan Fritz, Joyce Iutcovich, Ferris J. Ritchey, William C. Yoels and the anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. This article is available in Sociological Practice: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/socprac/vol11/iss1/17 The Medical Sociologists' Contribution to the Interdisciplinary Geriatric Assessment Unit: A Sociology "With" Medicine* Jeffrey Michael Clair, University of Alabama at Birmingham ABSTRACT Observations are drawn from field experience to explicate the role of the med- ical sociologist within geriatric clinical practice—a case presentation of a soci- ology "with" medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIOLOGY 515.01W Medical Sociology COURSE SYLLABUS: Summer II 2015
    SOCIOLOGY 515.01W Medical Sociology COURSE SYLLABUS: Summer II 2015 Instructor: Yvonne Villanueva-Russell (Associate Professor) Office: Social Sciences 307 Office Hours: by appointment Office Phone: (903) 886-5320 Office Fax: 903-886-5330 University Email Address: [email protected] eCollege Website: https://myleo.tamuc.edu COURSE INFORMATION Materials – Textbooks, Readings, Supplementary Readings: 1] Abraham, Laurie Kaye. 1994. Mama Might Be Better Off Dead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN-13: 978-0226001395 2] Eight reserve readings (these articles have been posted on eCollege by your professor) COURSE DESCRIPTION This course will examine research and theory on the changing concepts of health, illness and medical practice as well as place these understandings in socio-historical and comparative context. Topics will include: social epidemiology, the social construction of health/illness, the experience of illness, health professions, alternative medicine and the health care system. Emphasis on how social factors such as gender, race, social class and sexual preference affect both illness and health care. STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: 1) Students will demonstrate the ability to synthesize evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles in written work. 2) Student will demonstrate comprehension of sociological concepts and issues within the field of medical sociology through written work. 3) Students will show the ability to critically evaluate concepts in the field of medical sociology through the book review assignment. Sociology 515 Syllabus Summer II, 2015 1 COURSE REQUIREMENTS Instructional/Methods/Activities Assessments 1, Weekly Written Papers: 4 papers @ 30 points each- due on FRIDAYS This course element is designed to measure Learning Outcomes 1 & 2: 1) Students will demonstrate the ability to synthesize evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles in written work.
    [Show full text]