TABLE of CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction & Scoping

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TABLE of CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction & Scoping CALFED Category III Grant 98E14 American River (North and Middle Forks) Integrated Watershed Plan and Stewardship Strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction & Scoping Introduction 1-1 Physical/Biological Characteristics 1-2 Erosion Hazard 1-4 Geology/Soils 1-5 Climate/Precipitation 1-6 Vegetation/Land Cover 1-7 Fire 1-9 Water Quality/Quantity/Uses 1-9 Animal/Plant communities 1-14 Economy 1-15 Public and Agency Scoping 1-16 Initial Scoping 1-16 Final Objectives 1-27 Resource Issues 1-36 Desired Future Conditions 1-37 Chapter 2 Data Collection Assessment Plan 2-1 Issues/Objectives/Resources 2-1 Watershed Assessment Goals 2-9 Resource Assessment Themes 2-11 Assessment Approach 2-12 Data Assemblage Phase 1 First Generation GIS Products & System 2-15 US Forest Service 2-15 Additional First Generation Products 2-44 Phase 1 Conclusion 2-47 Phase 2 Second Generation GIS Products 2-47 Subwatershed Delineation 2-48 GIS-Based Subwatershed Analysis/Ranking 2-50 Watershed Assessments Geology 2-74 Soil-Water Routing 2-100 Channels 2-125 Erosion Hazard 2-140 Phase 3 Third Generation GIS Products 2-145 Placer County Fire Safe Council GIS Assessment 2-145 Greater Auburn Area FSC GIS Map Assessment 2-147 Placer Hills FSC GIS Map Assessment 2-148 Greater Colfax Area FSC GIS Map Assessment 2-149 Alta FSC GIS Map Assessment 2-150 Iowa Hill FSC GIS Map Assessment 2-151 Foresthill FSC GIS Map Assessment 2-152 GIS System 2-152 Additional Watershed Assessment and Data Analysis 2-153 Table of Contents Page 1 CALFED Category III Grant 98E14 American River (North and Middle Forks) Integrated Watershed Plan and Stewardship Strategy Human History in the Watershed 2-153 Census Demographics 2-159 Biomass Utilization (Amesbury) 2-166 Hydrology Study (Humphrey) 2-186 Chapter 3 Watershed Evaluation Introduction 3-1 Agency Review 3-1 Federal 3-2 US Forest Service (USFS) 3-2 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 3-8 Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) 3-13 State 3-17 California Department of Forestry (CDF) 3-17 Resource Conservation District (RCD) 3-21 Local 3-24 El Dorado County 3-24 Nevada County 3-36 Placer County 3-46 Stewardship Opportunities Common to All Agencies 3-65 Non-governmental Organizations 3-67 Chapter 4 Stewardship Strategy Introduction 4-1 Programmatic ARWG Stewardship Strategies 4-3 Landowner Component 4-3 Commercial/Business Component 4-6 Agency Component 4-9 Field Strategies 4-13 Firesafe Ecosystem 4-13 Sediment 4-24 Education 4-26 Data Management & Capacity-Building 4-30 Resource Inventory 4-33 Chapter 5 Pilot Projects Introduction 5-1 Pilot Project #1- Bunch Canyon 5-2 Bunch Canyon Pilot GIS Analysis 5-4 Applied Stewardship Strategies 5-7 Programmatic 5-8 Field 5-10 Table of Contents Page 2 CALFED Category III Grant 98E14 American River (North and Middle Forks) Integrated Watershed Plan and Stewardship Strategy Pilot Project #2 - Upper Middle Fork American 5-13 Middle Fork Pilot GIS Analysis 5-16 Applied Stewardship Strategies 5-20 Programmatic 5-20 Field 5-22 Chapter 6 Evaluation/Monitoring Project Evaluation 6-3 Stewardship Program Objectives 6-3 Watershed Health/Conditions Objectives 6-6 Monitoring Implementation-Accomplishments to Date 6-9 Appendices 7 Appendix A Phase I GIS Soil-Water Routing Hand Calculations Appendix B Phase I GIS Available Water Capacity Appendix C Phase I GIS USFS Metadata Appendix D Phase II GIS ARWG Metadata example (each coverage or grid has metadata in ArcCatalog) Appendix E Placer Legacy Draft Strategy for the Conservation of Biological Resources Appendix F A Guide to Placer County Ecological Zones Appendix G A Watershed-Based Approach for Setting Conservation Priorities in Nevada County, CA Appendix H Biomass Utilization Background Material Forest-Sourced Biomass Utilization Table of Contents Page 3 CALFED Category III Grant 98E14 American River (North and Middle Forks) Integrated Watershed Plan and Stewardship Strategy List of Maps & Figures Map # Map Name Page Map 1-1 ARWG Area Shaded Relief Map 1-1 Map 1-2 Fifth Field Watershed Boundaries 1-2 Map 2-1 Change Detection 2-18 Map 2-2 Cities, Towns & Other Landmarks 2-21 Map 2-3 80-Ft Contour Interval 2-21 Map 2-4 Major Vegetation Covertypes 2-22 Map 2-5 Fire Frequency 2-25 Map 2-6 Bedrock Geology 2-27 Map 2-7 Government Administrative Boundaries 2-30 Map 2-8 Mining Sites and Features 2-30 Map 2-9 Placer Co. Prop. 204 Projects 2-31 Map 2-10 Quad Index 2-32 Map 2-11 Average Annual Precipitation 2-32 Map 2-12 Rain on Snow Zone 2-33 Map 2-13 Wilderness, Wild & Scenic Rivers and Roadless Areas 2-33 Map 2-14 Road System 2-37 Map 2-15 General Landscape Incision 2-39 Map 2-16 Streams 2-39 Map 2-17 Fifth Field Watershed Boundaries 2-41 Map 2-18 Road Density for Sixth Field Watersheds 2-43 Map 2-19 Relative Fast Runoff Potential 2-45 Map 2-20 Available Water Capacity I 2-45 Map 2-21 Delayed Runoff Potential [superceded by Map 2-45] Map 2-22 Groundwater Recharge [superceded by Map 2-46 and 2-47] Map 2-23 Erosion Hazard Potential [superceded by Map 2-52 & 2-54] Map 2-24 American River Region Calwater Watersheds & 500-Acre Subwatersheds 2-49 Map 2-25 American River Region: Watershed Zones 2-53 Map 2-26 American River Region: Subwatershed Scores 2-56 Map 2-27 American River Region: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem 2-57 Report Areas of Late Successional Emphasis Map 2-28 American River Region: Blue Oak Woodlands 2-59 Map 2-29 American River Region: Mines in Subwatersheds 2-65 Map 2-30 American River Region: California Natural Diversity 2-67 Database Threatened and Endangered Species Map 2-31 American River Region: Mean Parcel Size 2-69 Map 2-32 American River Region: Subwatershed Road Density 2-70 Map 2-33 American River Region: Relative Road Density 2-70 Normalized by Ecological Zones Map 2-34 American River Region: Roads in Streamside Zones 2-70 Map 2-35 Geology II 2-74 and 2-83 Map 2-36 Generalized Watershed Incision 2-36 Map 2-37 Bedrock Permeability first approximation 2-86 Map 2-38 Potential Geochemical Hazards: Low-sulfide 2-92 Table of Contents Page 4 CALFED Category III Grant 98E14 American River (North and Middle Forks) Integrated Watershed Plan and Stewardship Strategy gold-quartz deposits Map 2-39 Potential Geochemical Hazards: Sulfide deposits, 2-92 kuroko type Map 2-40 Potential Geochemical Hazards: Copper 2-92 porphyry deposits Map 2-41 Potential Geochemical Hazards: Copper skarn deposits 2-93 Map 2-42 Potential Geochemical Hazards: Anthropogenic mercury 2-93 Map 2-43 Soils: Relative Direct Runoff Potential 2-111 Map 2-44 Soils: Available Water Capacity II 2-113 Map 2-45 Soils: Relative Subsurface Stormflow Runoff Potential 2-113 Map 2-46 Soils: Relative Groundwater Recharge Potential 2-115 Map 2-47 Potential Groundwater Recharge: Soil and Geologic 2-115 Parameters Map 2-48 Precipitation Regime 2-135 Map 2-49 Dominant Channel Forming Runoff Regime 2-135 Map 2-50 Dominant Channel Forming Runoff Regime: Global 2-135 Warming Scenario Map 2-51 Wildland Fire: Potential Intensity 2-140 Map 2-52 Erosion Hazard: Soil & Slope Parameters 2-141 Map 2-53 Precipitation Intensity: 2 year – 6 hour Storm 2-141 Map 2-54 Erosion Hazard: Soil & Precipitation Parameters 2-141 Map 2-55 Wildland Fire: Potential Erosion Hazard 2-142 Map 2-56 Placer County Fire Safe Councils: Vegetation Types 2-146 Map 2-57 Placer County Fire Safe Councils: Fuel Hazard Ranking 2-146 Map 2-58 Greater Auburn Area Fire Safe Council Base Map 2-147 Map 2-59 GAAFSC: Contour Map 2-147 Map 2-60 GAAFSC: Elevation Schematic 2-147 Map 2-61 GAAFSC: Fire History 2-147 Map 2-62 GAAFSC: Fuel Model ` 2-147 Map 2-63 GAAFSC: Fuel Hazard Ranking 2-147 Map 2-64 GAAFSC: Ownership 2-147 Map 2-65 GAAFSC: Placer County General Plan Zoning Designation 2-147 Map 2-66 Placer Hills Fire Safe Council: Base Map 2-148 Map 2-67 PHFSC: Contour Map 2-148 Map 2-68 PHFSC: Elevation Schematic 2-148 Map 2-69 PHFSC Fire History 2-148 Map 2-70 PHFSC: Fuel Model 2-148 Map 2-71 PHFSC: Fuel Hazard Rank 2-148 Map 2-71 PHFSC: Ownership 2-148 Map 2-73 PHFSC: Placer County General Plan Zoning Designation 2-148 Map 2-74 Greater Colfax Area Fire Safe Council: Base Map 2-149 Map 2-75 GCAFSC: Elevation Map 2-149 Map 2-76 GCAFSC: Historical Fires 2-149 Map 2-77 GCAFSC: Fuel Model 2-149 Map 2-78 GCAFSC: Fuel Hazard Ranking 2-149 Map 2-79 GCAFSC: Ownership 2-149 Map 2-80 GCAFSC: Placer County General Plan Zoning Designation 2-149 Map 2-81 Alta Fire Safe Council: Base Map 2-150 Table of Contents Page 5 CALFED Category III Grant 98E14 American River (North and Middle Forks) Integrated Watershed Plan and Stewardship Strategy Map 2-82 AFSC: Elevation Schematic 2-150 Map 2-83 AFSC: Fire History 2-150 Map 2-84 AFSC: Fuel 2-150 Map 2-85 AFSC: Fuel Hazard Map 2-150 Map 2-86 AFSC: Ownership 2-150 Map 2-87 AFSC: Placer County General Plan Zoning Designation 2-150 Map 2-88 Iowa Hill Fire Safe Council: Base Map 2-151 Map 2-89 IHFSC: Elevation Schematic 2-151 Map 2-90 IHFSC: Historical Fires 2-151 Map 2-91 IHFSC: Fuel Hazard Ranking 2-151 Map 2-92 IHFSC: Fuel Model 2-151 Map 2-93 IHFSC: Ownership 2-151 Map 2-94 IHFSC: Placer County General Plan Zoning Designation 2-151 Map 2-95 Foresthill Fire Safe Council: Base Map 2-152 Map 2-96 FFSC: Elevation Schematic 2-152 Map 2-97 FFSC: Historical Fires 2-152 Map 2-98 FFSC: Fuel Model 2-152 Map 2-99 FFSC: Fuel Hazard Rank 2-152 Map 2-100 FFSC: Ownership 2-152 Map 2-101 FFSC: Placer County General Plan Zoning Designation 2-152 Map 2-102 Colfax and Placer Hills Fire Safe Councils: Census Population and Tracks versus Blocks 2-163 Map 2-103 Colfax and Placer Hills Fire Safe Councils: Census Data: Households per Block 2-164 Map 2-104 Colfax and Placer Hills Fire Safe Councils: Census Data: Households with presence of people over 65 years 2-165 Map 2-105 BestBet Map 1: Biomass Supply and Business Location Map 2-173 Map 2-106 BestBet Map 2: Biomass Modeling Results Map Bunch Canyon Assessment Area (Bunch Canyon Pilot) 2-173 Map 2-107 BestBet Map 3: Biomass Modeling Results Map PCWA Assessment Area (Upper MF Pilot 2-174 Map 2-108 BestBet Map 4: Biomass Modeling Results Map Firesafe Council Assessment Area 2-175 Map 2-109 BestBet Map 5: Potential Future Projects Within Assessment Area 2-177 Map 2-110 Middle Fork American River USGS Gage Station No.
Recommended publications
  • UPDATE VOL 23 NO 4 AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2009 PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY Water • Energy • Stewardship
    UPDATE VOL 23 NO 4 AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2009 PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY water • energy • stewardship IN THIS ISSUE: Helping to Plan Tahoe Water Supplies... Page 2 Placer Students Are Water Aware... Page 3 Update for an Old Dam Two-Year Project to Improve Spillway at French Meadows ollowing eight years of studies, planning and design, PCWA is preparing to rebuild key sec- tions of the almost 50-year-old dam that holds back water at French FMeadowsF Reservoir. L.L. Anderson Dam, named for the late Foresthill Divide community leader, and District 5 county supervisor and PCWA director, was built in 1963-66 as a key feature of PCWA’s Middle Fork Regulatory Commission confirmed the Mountain Waterworks American River Project. Corps’ conclusion. The spillway at French Meadows, above, French Meadows Reservoir holds Probable Maximum Flood at left, will be upgraded after studies 136,400 acre-feet of water and is situated Using modern hydrometerological showed that it is too small to handle a at 5200 feet on the western slope of the data, the Corps developed a 72-hour maximum probable flooding event. Sierra Nevada. Lake Tahoe lies about 18 Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) miles to the east. Donner Summit is depth of 46 inches for the French about 15 miles north. Meadows watershed. This computed to a be overtopped,” said PCWA Hydroelectric In 2001, the U.S. Army Corps of French Meadows inflow of 66,700 cubic Engineer Jon Mattson. “This could cause Engineers first released hydrologic studies feet per second, which could overtop the failure of the dam and significant down- showing that the existing L.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Existing Resources
    M I dd L E F O R K 80 A M E R I C A N FRENCH MEADOWS RESER VOIR HELL HOLE R LAKE RESER IVERTAHOE PROJECT VOIR MIDDLE FORK INTERBAY RALSTON AFTERBAY FORESTHILL RUBICON 49 MIDDLE FORK RIVER AMERICAN RIVER 80 AUBURN 50 The Middle Fork 49 River watershed rests in the heartAmerican of the Sierra Nevada, between the Sacramento V Lake alley to the west and Tahoe to the east. S FOLSOM u p p RESER o r t VOIR i n g D SD E o Existing c u Relevant S m u p e p n Comprehensive o t r E Plans & t i n g Resource D SD F o Resources Mgmt. Plans HE MFP IS SITUATED IN THE FOOTHILLS AND c u Existing m e n Resource mountainous uplands of the western slope of the Sierra Nevada t S F u p Information p WatershedT (totaling 616 square miles) is characterized by hot, dry range, northeast of Auburn, California. The surrounding o r Report t i n g summers and mild, wet winters, with most of the precipitation falling D SD G o c S u 00/00 between October and March. Precipitation primarily falls as rain in the u m p p e n Technical o t r lower elevations and snow at elevations greater than 5,000 feet above t G i Study Plans n g D SD J mean sea level (msl). Elevations higher than about 6,000 feet msl are & Reports o c u Confi dential m e typically covered by snow until May.
    [Show full text]
  • Biggie Vegetation Management and Fuels Reduction Project Environmental Assessment
    United States Department Biggie Vegetation Management of Agriculture and Fuels Reduction Project Fore st Service Environmental Assessment Pacific Southwest Region June 2016 Tahoe National Forest American River Ranger District Biggie Vegetation Management and Fuels Reduction Project Environmental Assessment In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Bald Eagle Management Plan
    Application for New License Middle Fork American River Project (FERC Project No. 2079) Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC Project No. 2079) BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT PLAN Placer County Water Agency P.O. Box 6570 Auburn, CA 95604 February 2011 February 2011 Application for New License Middle Fork American River Project (FERC Project No. 2079) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Plan Objective ........................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Presence of Bald Eagles in the Vicinity of the MFP ................................................ 2 3.1 Bald Eagle Nests and Reproductive Chronology .......................................... 2 3.2 Bald Eagle Winter Roosts ............................................................................. 2 3.3 Bald Eagle Occurrences ............................................................................... 3 4.0 Routine Project Maintenance Activities and Project-Related Recreation ................ 3 4.1 Routine Project Maintenance ....................................................................... 3 4.1.1 Vegetation and Integrated Pest Management .................................... 3 4.1.2 Transportation System Management ................................................. 4 4.1.3 Project Powerline Maintenance ......................................................... 5 4.2 Recreation Facility
    [Show full text]