DROR PALEY PRINCIPLES of DEFORMITY CORRECTION Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Gmbh DROR PALEY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DROR PALEY PRINCIPLES of DEFORMITY CORRECTION Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Gmbh DROR PALEY DROR PALEY PRINCIPLES OF DEFORMITY CORRECTION Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH DROR PALEY PRINCIPLES OF 0 EFOR M I TV CORRECTION With Editorial Assistance from J. E. Herzenberg With More Than 1,800 Separate Illustrations, Clinical Photographs, and Radiographs i Springer DROR PALEY,MD,FRCSC ISBN 978-3-642-63953-1 ISBN 978-3-642-59373-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-59373-4 Director, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics Sinai Hospital 1st ed. 2002. Corr. 3rd printing 2005 Co-Director, The International Center for Limb Lengthening, Sinai Hospital CIP-data applied for Baltimore, MD Die Deutsche Bibliothek- CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Paley, Dror: Principles of deformity correction 1 Dror Paley.­ Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; Barcelona; Hongkong; Present address: London ; Mailand ; Paris ; Singapur ; Tokio : Springer, 2002 Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics Sinai Hospital This work is subject to copyright. Ali rights are reserved, 2401 West Belvedere Avenue whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specif­ Baltimore, Maryland 21215-5271, USA ically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any E-mail: [email protected] other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this pub­ lication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions www.limblengthening.org of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its cur­ www.deformitycourse.com rent version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law. http:/ /www.springer.de © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002 Originally published by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York in 2002 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2002 The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trade­ marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Product liability: The publishers cannot guarantee the accu­ racy of any information about dosage and application con­ tained in this book. In every individual case the user must check such information by consulting the relevant literature. Cover design: E. Kirchner, Heidelberg Product management and layout: B. Wieland, Heidelberg Typesetting and production: AM-production, Wiesloch 24/3150-5 4 3 2 1 o Printed on acid-free paper ~----------------------------------------------------... This book is dedicated to the memory of my father, Zvi Paley, who gave so much and asked for so little. Foreword - What is genius? Analyzing complex problems and find­ are technique-centric, this tome is principle-based and ing simple ways to explain them in an understandable will therefore stand the test of time. manner. By this definition, this book is genius. The limb lengthening and deformity reconstruction center created by Drs. Paley and Herzenberg in Balti­ The most dramatic progress in orthopaedic surgery more is not only the clinical laboratory where this defor­ during the last 2 decades has been in the field of defor­ mity correction work was developed and understood mity correction. The treatment of deformities has occu­ but has also become the Mecca for students in this med­ pied and challenged orthopaedic surgeons since Nicho­ ical specialty, with visitors from allover the world trav­ las Andry. So many brilliant people have worked in this eling to learn firsthand from these masters of deformity field. Among them, Friedrich Pauwel and Gavril Ilizarov correction. It is in this manner that I first became ex­ should be individually named. Dr. Ilizarov developed posed to the CORA method of mechanical and anatom­ new methods oflimb lengthening and deformity correc­ ic axis planning. This has resulted in a long-standing col­ tion and sparked the newfound interest and develop­ laboration between our two facilities, centered on our ments in this field today. In Dror Paley, this spark be­ common interest in this subspecialty. We routinely apply came a raging fire. these principles to deformity correction at our center in Dr. Paley inaugurated many innovations in the field Germany. Many of the new deformity correction devic­ of deformity correction. Among them, his nomenclature es that I and others are designing are now based on the deserves special mention. Before his classification based CORA principles. on joint orientation, we had a plethora of confusing Dr. Paley'S deformity correction courses around the terminology and definitions leading to a confusion of world have popularized the planning methods and prin­ language reminiscent of the Tower of Babel. Dr. Paley's ciples espoused in this book. The annual Baltimore Limb nomenclature standardizes the terminology in a man­ Deformity Course is the foundation for this book, work­ ner that requires little memorization. This logically book, and CD. Each of its chapters has been presented as based system has gained international recognition and lectures at this course, and the workbook and multime­ acceptance as the single language of deformity analysis dia CD have been tested by live audiences at these cours­ and correction. This book presents us with these con­ es for many years. cepts. The principles and concepts outlined in this book I am sure this book will become the bible for the under­ were not discovered or understood overnight. They rep­ standing, diagnosis, and treatment of lower limb defor­ resent an evolution of Dr. Paley's ideas from the past mities. 14 years of clinical work in the field of deformity correc­ tion. Unlike other texts, which come and go because they Wiesbaden, Germany JOACHIM PFEIL Preface - My prediction: this book will become a classic. Brave pathological abnormalities that come under the pur­ words, but I can safely make this statement because this view of the adult and pediatric orthopaedist. book is not about the latest surgical operation or about It has been my privilege and honor to be associated our knowledge of certain pathologies, which is constant- professionally with Dr. Dror Paley for the past 10 years, 1y changing. Rather, this book presents a system of de­ and I probably know him better than anyone else does. I formity analysis that is universal and applicable to any have therefore been in a unique position to observe how past, current, or future surgical osteotomy techniques he developed the CORA method and to contribute as a and hardware. One needs only to think back to medical co-developer, editor, and author. Dr. Paley has an uncan­ school and realize that most of the textbooks that we so ny knack of clearly seeing and understanding ortho­ carefully studied are now "of historic interest only:' paedic deformities. More importantly, he has a unique Grant's Atlas ofAnatomy is perhaps the only book from ability to then process and integrate this information to my medical school days that I still use. I predict that Pa­ make it accessible to the less clairvoyant. We have ley's Principles of Deformity Correction will also have a striven to make this method practical and teachable. It long shelflife. The treatment of skeletal deformity is the is not hard to learn, but it does take some effort and heart of our specialty. Indeed, the very name of our spe­ practice. The method is mercifully low-tech: the only cialty, orthopaedics, was coined by Nicholas Andry in tools required are a pencil, ruler, and goniometer. We 1741 as a word derived from two Greek words, orthos have honed our ability to teach this method during the (meaning straight) and paedis (meaning child) to indi­ past 10 years at our annual Baltimore Limb Deformity cate his goal "to teach the different methods of prevent­ Course, and many of the figures and cases illustrated in ing and correcting deformities of children" (from Mer­ this book have been used in the course. The case studies cer Rang's Anthology of Orthopaedics, 1966). and the artists' diagrams are all derived from our own Since Andry's writings 260 years ago, little progress practices and are representative of deformities that we has been made in understanding, analyzing, and quan­ have treated. In this regard, we are greatly indebted to tifying the types of limb deformities. Rarely do we come our patients for providing us with both typical and atyp­ across an orthopaedic surgeon who is truly an artist (or ical problems to study and illustrate. sculptor). Such an individual does not require accurate Interestingly, the CORA method of deformity analy­ preoperative planning to execute a flawless corrective sis began simply as an attempt to make some sense of the osteotomy. However, for the rest of us journeymen or­ Ilizarov apparatus. As the orthopaedic surgeon who in­ thopaedic surgeons, achieving such beautiful artistic troduced this method in Canada and the USA, Dr. Paley and aesthetic outcomes is elusive. We tend to take a struggled to understand the concept of the Ilizarov wedge here or there, by eyeball estimation, and then hinge, which is what made the Ilizarov fixator so unique rationalize the less than perfect appearance of the final in its ability to correct deformities in a controlled fash­ X-ray. "It's not bad" or "it should remodel:' True, there ion. In his early experience, he observed some of the sec­ have been attempts by notable surgeons, such as Fried­ ondary deformities that arose from mismatching the lo­ rich Pauwels and Maurice Mueller, to be more precise in cation of the hinge and the CORA. In his effort to more our planning. Although we may have received training accurately identify the level for the Ilizarov hinge, he de­ in the precise repositioning of fracture fragments with rived the CORA method of mechanical and anatomic plates and screws and accurate preoperative planning axis planning described in this text.
Recommended publications
  • Life Science Journal 2015;12(1)
    Life Science Journal 2015;12(1) http://www.lifesciencesite.com Can One Treat Pilon Fracture In Conjunction With Accurate Osseous Reduction And Rigid Fixation By Ilizarov And Assisted Arthroscopic Reduction? Ahmad Altonesy Abdelsamie and Amr I. Zanfaly Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt. [email protected] Abstract: Introduction: Anatomic restoration of the joint is the goal of management in fractures about the ankle. Open surgical treatment of comminuted tibialPilon fractures is associated with substantial complications in many patients. Indirect reduction and stabilization of fractures by means of distraction using a circular external fixator and anatomic repositioning of the joint surface assisted by arthroscopy can be a useful method of achieving satisfactory joint restoration. The potential benefits are less extensive exposure, preservation of blood supply, and improved visualization of the pathology. Patient and methods: This was a prospective study conducted between October 2010 and, September 2013 on twelve patients were presented to the emergency department of Zagazig university hospitals with high energy distal tibial fractures of closed and Gustilo Types I&II open fractures. All cases were treated using Ilizarov fixators with or without limited internal fixation and assessment of intra-articular reduction of tibial plafond by arthroscopy. All had been allowed to bear partial weight on the limb in the early postoperative period. A follow up review ranged from12 to 18 months(mean 15 months). Results: All cases had united with a mean time of 13.75 weeks (range from 8 to 19), good range of motion was achieved in most at the end of the follow up period.
    [Show full text]
  • Femoral Reconstruction Using External Fixation
    SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research Advances in Orthopedics Volume 2011, Article ID 967186, 10 pages doi:10.4061/2011/967186 Research Article Femoral Reconstruction Using External Fixation Yevgeniy Palatnik and S. Robert Rozbruch Limb Lengthening and Deformity Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, USA Correspondence should be addressed to S. Robert Rozbruch, [email protected] Received 15 July 2010; Revised 28 October 2010; Accepted 3 January 2011 Academic Editor: Boris Zelle Copyright © 2011 Y. Palatnik and S. R. Rozbruch. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. The use of an external fixator for the purpose of distraction osteogenesis has been applied to a wide range of orthopedic problems caused by such diverse etiologies as congenital disease, metabolic conditions, infections, traumatic injuries, and congenital short stature. The purpose of this study was to analyze our experience of utilizing this method in patients undergoing a variety of orthopedic procedures of the femur. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed our experience of using external fixation for femoral reconstruction. Three subgroups were defined based on the primary reconstruction goal lengthening, deformity correction, and repair of nonunion/bone defect. Factors such as leg length discrepancy (LLD), limb alignment, and external fixation time and complications were evaluated for the entire group and the 3 subgroups. Results. There was substantial improvement in the overall LLD, femoral length discrepancy, and limb alignment as measured by mechanical axis deviation (MAD) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) for the entire group as well as the subgroups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Intervertebral Disc Regeneration
    applied sciences Review The Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Intervertebral Disc Regeneration 1, 1,2 1, Zepur Kazezian y, Kieran Joyce and Abhay Pandit * 1 CÚRAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 W2TY Galway, Ireland; [email protected] (Z.K.); [email protected] (K.J.) 2 School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland * Correspondence: [email protected] Zepur Kazezian is currently at Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. y Received: 17 August 2020; Accepted: 7 September 2020; Published: 9 September 2020 Abstract: Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a leading cause of low back pain worldwide, incurring a significant burden on the healthcare system and society. IVD degeneration is characterized by an abnormal cell-mediated response leading to the stimulation of different catabolic biomarkers and activation of signalling pathways. In the last few decades, hyaluronic acid (HA), which has been broadly used in tissue-engineering, has popularised due to its anti-inflammatory, analgesic and extracellular matrix enhancing properties. Hence, there is expressed interest in treating the IVD using different HA compositions. An ideal HA-based biomaterial needs to be compatible and supportive of the disc microenvironment in general and inhibit inflammation and downstream cascades leading to the innervation, vascularisation and pain sensation in particular. High molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMW HA) and HA-based biomaterials used as therapeutic delivery platforms have been trialled in preclinical models and clinical trials. In this paper, we reviewed a series of studies focused on assessing the effect of different compositions of HA as a therapeutic, targeting IVD degeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Bone Age in Clinical Practice – Part 2
    Mini Review HORMONE Horm Res Paediatr 2011;76:10–16 Received: March 25, 2011 RESEARCH IN DOI: 10.1159/000329374 Accepted: May 16, 2011 PÆDIATRIC S Published online: June 21, 2011 The Use of Bone Age in Clinical Practice – Part 2 a d f e b David D. Martin Jan M. Wit Ze’ev Hochberg Rick R. van Rijn Oliver Fricke g h j c George Werther Noël Cameron Thomas Hertel Stefan A. Wudy i k a a Gary Butler Hans Henrik Thodberg Gerhard Binder Michael B. Ranke a b Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Children’s Hospital, Tübingen , Children’s Hospital, c University of Cologne, Cologne , and Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen , d e Germany; Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden , and Department of Radiology, f Emma Children’s Hospital/Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam , The Netherlands; Meyer Children’s g Hospital, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa , Israel; Department of Endocrinology, Royal Children’s Hospital h Parkville, Parkville, Vic. , Australia; Centre for Global Health and Human Development, Loughborough University, i Loughborough , and Institute of Child Health, University College London and University College London Hospital, j k London , UK; H.C. Andersen Children’s Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense , and Visiana, Holte , Denmark Key Words ness and cortical thickness should always be evaluated in -Skeletal maturity ؒ Bone age ؒ Tall stature ؒ relation to a child’s height and BA, especially around puber Precocious puberty ؒ Congenital adrenal hyperplasia ؒ ty. The use of skeletal maturity, assessed on a radiograph Bone mineral density alone to estimate chronological age for immigration author- ities or criminal courts is not recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction and Control of the Distraction Osteogenesis Course. Analytical Review A.M
    Genij Ortopedii, Tom 25, No 3, 2019 © Aranovich A.M., Stogov M.V., Kireeva E.A., Menshchikova T.I., 2019 DOI 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-3-400-406 Prediction and control of the distraction osteogenesis course. Analytical review A.M. Aranovich, M.V. Stogov, E.A. Kireeva, T.I. Menshchikova Russian Ilizarov Scientific Centre for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, Russian Federation This review analyzes and assesses the existing methods and approaches to prediction and control of the course of distraction osteogenesis (DO). The analysis of the literature revealed few works that recommended specific predictors or methods for prognosis of the course of distraction osteogenesis at the stages of limb lengthening. The authors identified some diagnostic criteria for assessing the distraction regenerate as potential criteria for predicting its development and maturation. It was found that all available predictors and potential diagnostic criteria for assessing the state of the distraction regenerate in clinical practice are used to further correct the distraction regime (respectively, at the stage of distraction) and to determine the timing of the removal of the apparatus, as well as prognosis of recurrence, fracture, and deformity of the regenerate in the non-apparatus period. It was shown that all known diagnostic methods can be applied for the assessment and prediction of the DO course: radiological, physiological, ultrasound diagnostics, laboratory tests. It is stated that a quantitative assessment of the informative value of most of the known predictors of DO disorders is necessary from the point of view of the evidence-based medicine. Difficulties and problems of the development and application of prognostic tests for assessing DO are described.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed at a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years (Maximum of 3 Years and 9 Months)
    J Orthopaed Traumatol (2012) 13 (Suppl 1):S57–S89 DOI 10.1007/s10195-012-0210-2 12 NOVEMBER 2012 In-Depth Oral Presentations and Oral Communications IN-DEPTH ORAL PRESENTATIONS achieve a stable synthesis and an early mobilization of the MP and IP joints. However, if a malunion is present, it has to be corrected sur- gically as soon as possible. AT05–HAND AND WRIST Radio-distal epiphysis fractures: treatment with angular stability Treatment of malunion of the proximal phalangeal fractures plate of latest generation of the hand R. Di Virgilio*, E. Coppari, E. Condarelli, M. Rendine V. Potenza*, S. Bisicchia, R. Caterini, A. Fichera, P. Farsetti, E. Ippolito (Rome, IT) Universita` di Roma Tor Vergata (Rome, IT) Introduction Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures of the upper limb and coincide with 17 % of all fractures treated in Introduction It is difficult to treat fractures of the phalanges of the emergency rooms. The incidence of these fractures is greater in hand because they can cause complications such as deformity and patients aged 6 to 10 years, and in those between 60 and 70 years. joint limitation with a reduction in the grasping function. The most In older patients the incidence is higher in females. In the articular frequent complications are malunion of the fracture and joint limi- fractures, displaced, dislocated and highly unstable is indicated tation. The greatest incidence of complications can be found in open internal fixation (ORIF) to restore the congruity of the joint transverse fractures of the base of the proximal phalanx, in articular surface, to restore the correct length of the radius, its inclination fractures, comminuted fractures, and in those associated with lesions and palmar tilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Knee Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures Version 1.0 Effective February 14, 2020
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES CMM-312: Knee Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures Version 1.0 Effective February 14, 2020 Clinical guidelines for medical necessity review of Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Services. © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0 CMM-312: Knee Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures CMM-312.1: Definitions 3 CMM-312.2: General Guidelines 5 CMM-312.3: Indications and Non-Indications 5 CMM-312.4: Experimental, Investigational, or Unproven 15 CMM-312.5: Procedure (CPT®) Codes 16 CMM-312.6: Procedure (HCPCS) Codes 19 CMM-312.7: References 20 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ©2020 eviCore healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Page 2 of 25 400 Buckwalter Place Boulevard, Bluffton, SC 29910 (800) 918-8924 www.eviCore.com Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0 CMM -312.1: Definitions The Modified Outerbridge Classification is a system that has been developed for judging articular cartilage injury to the knee. This system allows delineation of varying areas of chondral pathology, based on the qualitative appearance of the cartilage surface, and can assist in identifying those injuries that are suitable for repair techniques. The characterization of cartilage in this system is as follows: Grade I – Softening with swelling Grade II – Fragmentation and fissuring less than one square centimeter (1 cm2) Grade III – Fragmentation and fissuring greater than one square centimeter
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Distal Tibial Intra-Articular Fractures by Using Ring External Fixators Assisted Arthroscopically
    European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine ISSN 2515-8260 Volume 08, Issue 03, 2021 Management of distal tibial intra-articular fractures by using ring external fixators assisted arthroscopically Mohammed Safwat Shalabi, Mohammed Abdel Wahab Ibrahim, Ashraf Abd Al-Daim Mohamed, Mohammed Osama Mohammed Morsi* Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University *Corresponding author: Mohammed Osama Mohammed Morsi, Mobile: (+20) 0107682955, E-Mail: [email protected] Background: Tibial pilon fractures are relatively uncommon injuries, representing only 1% of all fractures of the lower limb and 5% to 10% of those of the tibia. Frequent comminution and the thin soft-tissue envelope in the area make the treatment of these fractures challenging. The tibial pilon is characterised by a total absence of muscle coverage and marginal vascularity, therefore, even moderate trauma often results in extensive soft-tissue damage. Objective: The aim of this present study was to evaluate the arthroscopic assisted (Ilizarov) ring external fixation of distal tibial intra articular (pilon) fractures. Patients and methods: This was a prospective study conducted between February 2012 and April 2015 on thirty patients with closed and Gustilo Types I & II open fractures of pilon fractures of the distal tibia who were admitted to Zagazig University Hospitals. during a period of two years and all cases were treated by Ilizarov fixators with or without limited internal fixation and assessment of intra-articular reduction tibial plafond by arthroscopy. Results: Nineteen patients had right-sided injury, eleven patients had left sided injury and one patient had bilateral injury. At the time of injury the youngest patient was 19 years old and the oldest was 6o years.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of G.A. Ilizarov to Bone Reconstruction: Historical Achievements and State of the Art
    Strat Traum Limb Recon (2016) 11:145–152 DOI 10.1007/s11751-016-0261-7 REVIEW Contribution of G.A. Ilizarov to bone reconstruction: historical achievements and state of the art 1 1 1 Alexander V. Gubin • Dmitry Y. Borzunov • Larisa O. Marchenkova • 1 1 Tatiana A. Malkova • Irina L. Smirnova Received: 16 March 2016 / Accepted: 9 July 2016 / Published online: 18 July 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Methodological solutions of Prof. G.A. Ilizarov injuries and orthopaedic diseases [1–7]. Nowadays, his are the core stone of the contemporary bone lengthening methodological solutions are the core stone of limb and reconstruction surgery. They have been acknowledged lengthening and reconstruction surgery and have been in the orthopaedic world as one of the greatest contribu- acknowledged in the orthopaedic world as one of the tions to treating bone pathologies. The Ilizarov method of greatest contributions to treating bone pathologies [5–7]. transosseous compression–distraction osteosynthesis has He started to develop his ideas of external fixation in the been widely used for managing bone non-union and middle of the last century when he was a rural surgeon in defects, bone infection, congenital and posttraumatic limb the Kurgan region of Russia. In the 1970–1980s, his ideas length discrepancies, hand and foot disorders. The optimal grew into a profound fundamental research and clinical conditions for implementing distraction and compression work conducted at one of the biggest orthopaedic centres of osteogenesis were proven by numerous experimental the world that specializes in bone reconstruction and is his studies that Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Ankle Fractures
    CHAPTER 26 PEDIATRIC ANKLE FRACTURES Sofi e Pinney, DPM, MS INTRODUCTION stronger than both the physis and bone. As a result, there is a greater capacity for plastic deformation and less chance of The purpose of this review is to examine the current intra-articular fractures, joint dislocation, and ligamentous literature on pediatric ankle fractures. I will discuss the disruptions. However, ligamentous injury may be more anatomic considerations of a pediatric patient, how to common than originally believed (1). A case-control study evaluate and manage these fractures, and when to surgically by Zonfrillo et al found an association between an increased repair them. Surgical techniques and complications will be risk of athletic injury in obese children, and concluded a briefl y reviewed. higher body mass index risk factor for ankle sprains (4). Ankle fractures are the third most common fractures in Secondary ossifi cation centers are located in the children, after the fi nger and distal radial physeal fracture. epiphysis. The distal tibial ossifi cation center appears at 6-24 Approximately 20-30% of all pediatric fractures are ankle months of age and closes asymmetrically over an 18-month fractures. Most ankle fractures occur at 8-15 years old. The period fi rst central, then medial and posterior, with the peak injury age is 11-12 years, and is relatively uncommon anterolateral portion closing last at 15 and 17 years of age for under the age 5. This injury is more common in boys. females and males, respectively. The distal fi bula ossifi cation The most common cause of pediatric ankle fractures is a center appears at 9-24 months of age and closes 1-2 years rotational force, and is often seen in sports injuries associated after the distal tibial.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Musculoskeletal Codes
    Updated January 2018 Commercial Musculoskeletal Codes Investigational or Non-Covered Spine Surgery Pain Management Joint Surgery Codes associated with an Arthrogram CPT Description Commercial Notes Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous 22100 process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; cervical 22101 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; thoracic 22102 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; lumbar Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, 22103 lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; each additional segment (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22110 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment;cervical Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22112 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; thoracic Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22114 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; lumbar each additional vertebral segment (list separately in addition to code 22116 for primary procedure) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 22206 1 vertebral
    [Show full text]
  • Ankle Injuries
    Pediatric Fractures of the Ankle Nicholas Frane DO Zucker/Hofstra School of Medicine Northwell Health Core Curriculum V5 Disclosure • Radiographic Images Courtesy of: Dr. Jon-Paul Dimauro M.D or Christopher D Souder, MD, unless otherwise specified Core Curriculum V5 Outline • Epidemiology • Anatomy • Classification • Assessment • Treatment • Outcomes Core Curriculum V5 Epidemiology • Distal tibial & fibular physeal injuries 25%-38% of all physeal fractures • Ankle is the 2nd most common site of physeal Injury in children • Most common mechanism of injury Sports • 58% of physeal ankle fractures occur during sports activities • M>F • Commonly seen in 8-15y/o Hynes D, O'Brien T. Growth disturbance lines after injury of the distal tibial physis. Their significance in prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:231–233 Zaricznyj B, Shattuck LJ, Mast TA, et al. Sports-related injuries in school-aged children. Am J Sports Med. 1980;8:318–324. Core Curriculum V5 Epidemiology Parikh SN, Mehlman CT. The Community Orthopaedic Surgeon Taking Trauma Call: Pediatric Ankle Fracture Pearls and Pitfalls. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31 Suppl 6:S27-S31. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001014 Spiegel P, et al. Epiphyseal fractures of the distal ends of the tibia and fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(8):1046-50. Core Curriculum V5 Anatomy • Ligamentous structures attach distal to the physis • Growth plate injury more likely than ligament failure secondary to tensile weakness in physis • Syndesmosis • Anterior Tibio-fibular ligament (AITFL) • Posterior Inferior Tibio-fibular
    [Show full text]