Gosford Development Control Plan 2013
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gosford City Centre Masterplan the Gosford Challenge Gosford City Centre Masterplan
City, Our destiny Gosford City Centre Masterplan The Gosford ChallenGe Gosford City Centre Masterplan r City, u O destiny a World Class reGional Waterfront City r City, iii u O destiny The Gosford ChallenGe Gosford City Centre Masterplan acknowledgments JOINT PROJeCt SPONSORS DESIGn TEAM Gosford City Council land and property Gosford Challenge team Clr Chris Holstein Management authority Colleen Worthy-Jennings Mayor Hon Tony Kelly MHR Stephen Fairnham Clr Craig Doyle Warwick Watkins Duncan Clarke Deputy Mayor Graham Harding Helen Polkinghorne Clr Chris Burke Brett Phillips John Tilston Clr Peter Freewater Stewart Veitch Barbara Cruise Clr Amy Houston Robert Eyre Clr Terri Latella Scott Burton Clr Jim Macfadyen Steve Green Clr Laurie Maher Sue Verhoek Clr Vicki Scott Kerr Partnering Clr Jeff Strickson Cox Architects and Planners Peter Wilson Patrick Condon Stephen Glen Rob Lane Gary Chestnut Aurecon Rod Williams Arup Nic Pasternatsky Oculus Terry Thirlwell teaming with ideas r City, u O destiny Contents 1 GROWING A REGIONAL CITY 2 4 MAKING IT HAPPEN 92 1.1 gosford as a regional city 3 4.1 implementation plan 93 1.2 greater metropolitan context 4 4.2 the beginning - two priority areas 96 1.3 regional context 5 APPENDICES 1.4 local context 6 appendix 1 sustainability 102 1.5 attributes of a regional city 8 appendix 2 regional benchmarks 110 1.6 purpose of a masterplan 10 appendix 3 retail and commercial market 114 1.7 the journey 12 appendix 4 participants 116 1.8 planning context 14 1.9 key strategic opportunities 15 2 SPATIAL FRAMEWORK 16 2.1 the city framework 16 2.2 the masterplan 18 2.3 five precincts of activity 20 3 MASTERPLAN ELEMENTS 48 3.1 connecting places 50 3.2 activate the city 56 3.3 responsive built form 60 3.4 generate jobs and new enterprises 64 3.5 living in the city 72 3.6 access and movement 76 3.7 sustaining the city (enhancing the natural environment) 86 note: diagrams of future development are concept only. -
Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to Questions on Notice Environment Portfolio
Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to questions on notice Environment portfolio Question No: 3 Hearing: Additional Estimates Outcome: Outcome 1 Programme: Biodiversity Conservation Division (BCD) Topic: Threatened Species Commissioner Hansard Page: N/A Question Date: 24 February 2016 Question Type: Written Senator Waters asked: The department has noted that more than $131 million has been committed to projects in support of threatened species – identifying 273 Green Army Projects, 88 20 Million Trees projects, 92 Landcare Grants (http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/3be28db4-0b66-4aef-9991- 2a2f83d4ab22/files/tsc-report-dec2015.pdf) 1. Can the department provide an itemised list of these projects, including title, location, description and amount funded? Answer: Please refer to below table for itemised lists of projects addressing threatened species outcomes, including title, location, description and amount funded. INFORMATION ON PROJECTS WITH THREATENED SPECIES OUTCOMES The following projects were identified by the funding applicant as having threatened species outcomes and were assessed against the criteria for the respective programme round. Funding is for a broad range of activities, not only threatened species conservation activities. Figures provided for the Green Army are approximate and are calculated on the 2015-16 indexed figure of $176,732. Some of the funding is provided in partnership with State & Territory Governments. Additional projects may be approved under the Natinoal Environmental Science programme and the Nest to Ocean turtle Protection Programme up to the value of the programme allocation These project lists reflect projects and funding originally approved. Not all projects will proceed to completion. -
Central Coast and Hawkesbury River Recreational Fishing Guide
Central Coast and Hawkesbury River Recreational Fishing Guide Fisheries Compliance Unit • fish aggregating devices (FADs) to enhance fishing for dolphinfish and even tuna and August 2020 marlin; Fishing is a fun, outdoor activity for the whole • creation of recreational fishing havens; family. Fishing rules help ensure healthy and sustainable fisheries for future generations. • angler facilities such as fish cleaning tables and fishing platforms; The Central Coast’s waterways provide excellent beach, rock, and boat fishing opportunities. This • stocking of freshwater fish in dams and rivers; guide provides essential information on fishing, • essential research on popular recreational fish including any closures and restrictions, which apply species; within the Central Coast district, extending from Munmorah State Recreation Park in the north, to • restoring important fish habitat; the southern bank of the Hawkesbury River. • marine stocking of prawns in estuaries; DPI fisheries officers routinely patrol waterways, • angler education and advisory programs such boat ramps and foreshores to advise anglers about as the Fishcare Volunteer program, fishing responsible fishing practices and to ensure workshops, Get Hooked…it's fun to fish compliance with NSW fishing regulations. primary schools education and fishing guides. Information on bag and size limits and legal fishing Much more information is available at gear can be obtained at www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fisheries. www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fisheries or by visiting your local DPI fisheries office. You can pay the NSW recreational fishing fee at www.onegov.nsw.gov.au or by calling 1300 369 To report suspected illegal fishing activity, call the 365 or at many outlets throughout NSW, such as Fishers Watch phone line on 1800 043 536 (free fishing tackle stores, caravan parks, local shops, call) or report on-line at service stations and many Kmart stores. -
The Corridor's Strengths
The Corridor’s strengths Wyong – a Town Centre with “good bones” Wyong Town Centre has many elements of a great regional centre, including an established fine grain street network with connections to a train station, Wyong River and open spaces. Home to the landmark Art House cultural facility, Council chambers and government agencies, Wyong is the cultural and civic Wyong River – a natural centrepiece core of the corridor. The character of Wyong Town Wyong River flows through the heart of the corridor, presenting as Centre is strengthened by a distinct heritage presence a natural centrepiece. Although access is constrained in some areas, and fine grain built form that line the high streets. the River is a significant asset, supporting an array of recreational activities including kayaking and fishing, as well as walking and cycle along the active transport links by the river foreshore. The River provides an important natural outlook for the surrounding urban Alison Street, Wyong areas. Tuggerah Lake, State Conservation Area (image: itsonlymylife163. blogspot) Natural Assets of Environmental Value The corridor is endowed with natural bushland precincts that provide environmental amenity to residents, workers and visitors. Tuggerah Nature Reserve features predominately untouched Wyong River from the Wyong Milk Factory bushlands and wetlands that have high conservation value, while the nearby Tuggerah State Conservation Area supports sustainable visitation and bushwalking. 26 DRAFT Tuggerah to Wyong Corridor Strategy Great local food, drink, arts and craft The Corridor features a growing number of exciting food, beverage, arts and craft offerings, building on growing interest in local and boutique products. There is a combination of restaurants, cafés, markets, function spaces and specialty stores in the area. -
Learning from the Past Research Project – Central Coast, NSW
Governance 21 Learning from the Past Research Project – Central Coast, NSW Rolf Fenner Australian Local Government Association Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT In 2003, the then Sustainable Ecosystems Division of the CSIRO was engaged by the Central Coast Region of NSW to undertake a detailed regional futures analysis based on a dynamic systems approach (Senge, 1992). A key component of such a research approach was the need to better understand and appreciate the historical context of previous regional planning policy initiatives. As a regional planning practitioner of several years experience, I was engaged by the CSIRO to undertake this “learning from the past” investigation. This paper summaries the value of such a research project by both examining the methodology adopted and findings arising from such an investigation. In short, the paper argues that as a consequence of reflecting on past policy experiences it is possible to better understand and appreciate what policy decisions were previously undertaken, and subsequently improve the opportunities for future policy decision making and implementation. A total of eighteen individuals were interviewed for the project. The regional participants chosen to be interviewed were a mixture of previous community leaders, politicians or senior professional bureaucrats. To encourage frank discussion and minimise any possibility of conflict of interests, all research participants at the time of interview were no longer in their substantive positions they once held. The process of identifying key individuals and relying on oral histories is not without methodological deficiencies. Whilst acknowledging these potential weaknesses, the project nevertheless was able to make a valuable contribution to regional planning on the Central Coast by identifying previous experiences and policy relationships as they related to matters of social, economic, environmental and local/ regional governance. -
Geographic Names
GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park. -
Settlement of the Tuggerah Lakes
Settlement of the Tuggerah Lakes The ecological history of the Tuggerah Lakes over the last 200 years is closely linked to the pattern of European settlement both around the lakes and within the upper catchment. As settlement spread throughout the district, activities such as the clearing of land, logging, fishing and urban development have all had impacts on the ecology of the lakes. To understand when each of these impacts occurred, the settlement of the Tuggerah Lakes and its catchment has been divided into four broad time periods. These are; • Aboriginal settlement • The first European settlers (1820s – 1870s) • Settlement after the opening of the railway (1880s – 1950s) • Urban Development (1960s – 1990s) Historical documents which provide an insight into the rates of settlement and associated activities during each of these time periods, are presented in the following sections. Table 1 provides a summary of some key dates in the development of the region. Table 1. Significant events in the development of the Tuggerah Lakes and its catchment Date Activity 1825 First settlers arrived. Early 1830s Logging commenced in the upper catchment, principally for cedar. Early 1830s Felton Mathews surveyed the district. 1832 The Great North Road was opened, principally as a means of providing access to the Hunter District from Sydney. There were two branches from this road into Wyong. 1830s Cabbage Tree Harbour provided a shipping point for cedar from the 1830s onwards. Gosford was another such departure point. Early1850s Hargraves residence at Noraville constructed using cedar from the valleys behind Wyong. 1854 Jane Taylor acquired all the land of what is now The Entrance. -
Hawkesbury Shelf Environmental Background Report
HAWKESBURY SHELF MARINE BIOREGION ASSESSMENT Hawkesbury Shelf environmental background report Background The NSW Marine Estate Management Authority (the Authority) was established by the NSW Government in 2013 to advise on policies, priorities and directions for the NSW marine estate. The NSW marine estate includes marine waters, estuaries and the coast. It extends seaward out to three nautical miles and from the Queensland border in the north to the Victorian border in the south. The full definition and map can be found at www.marine.nsw.gov.au. Contributors The Authority acknowledges the key contributions of officers from the following in preparing this report: • NSW Department of Primary Industries • Office of Environment and Heritage • Transport for NSW • Department of Planning and Environment • Marine Estate Expert Knowledge Panel Published by the NSW Marine Estate Management Authority Hawkesbury Shelf marine bioregion assessment – Hawkesbury Environmental background report First published February 2016 ISBN 978-1-74256-893-5 More information This paper and more information about the Hawkesbury Shelf marine bioregion assessment are available at www.marine.nsw.gov.au. RM8 reference INT15/135530 © State of New South Wales through the Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development, 2016.This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material provided that the wording is reproduced exactly, the source is acknowledged, and the copyright, update address and disclaimer notice are retained. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (February 2016). -
Recreational Crab Fishing in the Central Coast District
Recreational Crab Fishing in the Central Coast District Fisheries Compliance Unit claws used for crushing and cutting prey. The two hind legs are flattened for swimming. Mud Crabs July 2021 are generally very dark brown to mottled green in colour. Juveniles feed on planktonic animals, Overview benthic molluscs and crustaceans while adults Crab fishing is a popular recreational fishery and feed on bivalve and gastropod molluscs (mussels important commercial fishery in NSW. and pipis), small crabs and polychaete worms. This fishing guide is designed to provide key information to help: Mud Crab • ensure these fisheries remain sustainable by maximising voluntary compliance with crab fishing rules • reduce conflict between/within user groups • answer commonly asked questions about crab fishing rules • report illegal crab fishing and crab fishing gear theft, and • reduce bycatch and other impacts Popular crab species in NSW There a several popular eating crab species with the main two sought after being the Mud Crab and Blue Swimmer Crab Portunus pelagicus Blue Swimmer Crab. There are many other crab Distribution - Blue swimmer crabs are found in species are found in NSW including the Red Shore coastal waters from Cape Naturaliste in Western Crab, Swift Footed Crab and Soldier Crab which Australia, around the top end to NSW. The are popular bait species. Victorian border is the southern limit for distribution of the species on the east coast. Mud Crab Scylla serrata Distribution - Mud Crab inhabit tropical to warm Size - Maximum length of about 21cm across the temperate waters from Exmouth in Western carapace (shell), and a weight of up to 1kg. -
Measuring Success of Active Saltmarsh Restoration in Tuggerah Lakes
MEASURING SUCCESS OF ACTIVE SALTMARSH RESTORATION IN TUGGERAH LAKES P Laegdsgaard 1, N McGaharan 2 1Umwelt, Australia, Teralba, NSW 2Wyong Shire Council, Wyong, NSW Abstract As part of the Tuggerah Lakes Estuary Management Plan, Wyong Council identified specific areas for re-establishment of saltmarsh to the shores of the Tuggerah Lakes Estuary. These locations were highly modified and elevated above the water level of the lake. In Tuggerah Lakes the minimal tidal exchange combined with other impacts such as mowing and trampling inhibit the expansion any saltmarsh present. Restoration activities at these sites consisted of excavation to re-grade the foreshore area to reclaim natural hydrological processes suitable for saltmarsh establishment. This was followed by a replanting program using tube-stock and transplantation of salvaged saltmarsh species. It was considered important to establish the success of the restoration activities through a scientifically rigorous monitoring program and an adaptive management approach to the staggered restoration timeframe. It was initially predicted that, with regular watering of newly established saltmarsh with saline/brackish water, recovery could be achieved within 12 to 24 months of planting. Monitoring results showed this was not achieved due to low survivorship of tubestock in the low shore and slow expansion of saltmarsh in the upper shore. This has been linked to lack of regular tidal influence and fluctuating lake levels limiting the rapid expansion of the newly established saltmarsh in the Tuggerah Lakes estuary. It is now evident that rehabilitation to a level of reference sites has been achieved in sites that have had three and a half years of recovery time. -
Destination Management Plan 2018 – 2020 CONTENTS
Destination Management Plan 2018 – 2020 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 2 INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 About Destination Sydney Surrounds North 2.2 Key Stakeholders 2.3 Methodology 3 SITUATION ANALYSIS 10 3.1 Destination footprint 3.2 Value of the Visitor Economy 3.3 Visitor trends 3.4 Target markets and customers 3.5 Competitors and competitive position 3.6 Products and experiences 3.7 Marketing 3.8 SWOT Analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) 4 OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES 28 4.1 Opportunities 4.2 Challenges 5 VISION, MISSION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 31 5.1 Vision 5.2 Mission 5.3 Goal 5.4 Objectives 6 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 32 6.1 Advocate for the DSSN Visitor Economy and foster greater collaboration between regions in DSSN 6.2 Facilitate destination infrastructure development 6.3 Facilitate product and experience development 6.4 Facilitate major events growth 6.5 Maximise the benefits of funding programs 6.6 Facilitate industry skills development and knowledge 6.7 Improve destination marketing effectiveness 7 ACTION PLAN 42 8 RESOURCES 46 8.1 Human Resources 8.2 Financial Resources 9 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs) 47 10 KEY RISKS 48 11 IMAGE CREDITS 50 Destination Sydney Surrounds North – Destination Management Plan 2018 - 2020 3 ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS ATE Australian Tourism Exchange ATEC Australian Tourism Exchange Council DMP Destination Management Plan DNs Destination Networks DNSW Destination New South Wales DSSN Destination Sydney Surrounds North FIT Free Independent Travel ITOs Inbound Tour Operators LGA Local Government -
Investment Prospectus 2018!19 Newcastle
SYDNEY’S CENTRAL COAST INVESTMENT PROSPECTUS 2018!19 NEWCASTLE AUSTRALIA C E N T R A L COAST 1 H O U R F R O M SYDNEY Contents 1 Sydney’s Central Coast – A Snapshot 5 About the Central Coast 5 A Message from the Parliamentary Secretary for the Central Coast GOSFORD 7 Investment activity 15 Central Coast Regional Plan 2036 17 Gosford City Centre Revitalisation 19 Economic profile 20 Map – Central Coast 22 Key industries 25 Business centres 33 Industrial areas 35 Access to markets – Logistics 36 Infrastructure and utilities 37 Workforce 38 Education and training SYDNEY 39 Lifestyle 44 Who to talk to 44 Acknowledgments Sydney’s Central Coast – A Snapshot 1 Sydney’s Central Coast is a region just over an hour north of Sydney CBD. It is connected to the city by rail, the M1 Pacific Motorway and the soon to be completed North Connex connecting the area with Western Sydney. It forms part of the Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area which has a population of some 3.5 million people. The local working population is 104,734 of which approximately 30% commute into the City each day for work. Most of these commuters would prefer to work locally. The Central Coast has a resident population of 337,000 people and will grow to over 400,000 in the next 25 years. Gosford is the Capital City of the Central Coast and is presently seeing unprecedented investment. The NSW Government has made a commitment to the growth of the region and is investing almost a billion dollars in support of that growth while at the same time private investors have invested a similar amount with plans to spend more.