The Milky Way Is on a Collision Course with Its Neighbor, the Andromeda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Milky Way Is on a Collision Course with Its Neighbor, the Andromeda 5 billion years A.D. Our galaxy’s date with destruction The Milky Way is on a collision The Milky Way’s course with its neighbor, the Andromeda Galaxy. What will the night sky look like after the date with crash? ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ BY ABRAHAM LOEB AND T.J. COX ur home galaxy, the Milky Way, and its nearest neighbor, the Andromeda Galaxy, are on a collision course. Billions of years from now, the merger will drastically alter the struc- ture of both galaxies and spawn a new city of stars we have dubbed Milkomeda (“milk-AHM-mee-da”). The event will also radically transform the night sky. But into what? destruction Currently, the Milky Way’s thin disk of stars, dust, and gas appears as O a nebulous strip arching across the sky. As Andromeda grazes the Milky Way disk, we will see a second strip of stars looming across the night sky. After the final merger between these galaxies, the stars will no longer be confined to two narrow strips, but instead get scattered across the entire sky. In our research, we have explored the Milky Way’s fate by simulating the birth of Milkomeda in a supercomputer. The simulations are at a suf- ficient level of detail, or “resolution,” to learn much about the coming merger and how it will change our perspective on the universe. Although we will not be alive to witness the event — nor to take responsibility for whether our forecast proves accurate — this is the first research in our 24 Astronomy ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ June 08 Our galaxy’s date with destruction BILLIONS OF YEARS FROM NOW, the night sky will blaze with stars, dust, and gas from two galaxies: the Milky Way, in which we live, and the encroaching Andromeda Galaxy (M31). LYNEttE COOK FOR ASTRONOMY www.Astronomy.com 25 THE ANDROMEDA GALAXY (M31) is a typical spiral of stars, dust, and gas — the type of galaxy that dominates the night sky in the Local Universe. Fourteen small satellite galaxies axies are barreling toward each other at accompany Andromeda, including the two visible in this image: M32 (above Andromeda) nearly 270,000 mph (120 kilometers per and NGC 205 (below). TONY AND DAPHNE HALLAS second). We know this because the spectral lines of Andromeda’s light appear to be careers that has a chance of being cited in 5 Andromeda are the celebrity couple of the blueshifted — displaced toward the blue billion years. Local Group. end of the spectrum — by the Doppler In astronomical jargon, a galaxy group effect. This is in sharp contrast to most gal- The Local group comprises two or more massive galaxies in axies in the universe, which are flying away The vastness of the night sky might suggest relatively close proximity. As the headlights from the Milky Way. This spreading the Milky Way resides in a relatively remote on a dark country road indicate the exis- motion induces a redshift in the light from part of the Universe. However, astronomers tence of an entire car, the luminous stars of distant galaxies, a fact used to establish the know the Milky Way to be the second larg- a galaxy indicate the existence of an expanding universe since the time of the est member of the Local Group of galaxies. extended halo of “dark matter.” The close American astronomer Edwin Hubble (1889 The largest in the Local Group is Androm- proximity of galaxies in groups suggests – 1953). eda. It contains somewhat more mass than that their dark halos are gravitationally the Milky Way, resides nearly 2.5 million bound and dynamically coupled to each Timing is everything light years away, and is visible in the north- other. “Dynamically coupled” simply means Nearly 50 years ago, Franz Kahn and ern sky with the naked eye. The remaining the haloes attract each other via their gravi- Lodewijk Woltjer pioneered the “timing members of the Local Group — more than tational fields, and a change in one galaxy argument.” This hypothesis held that the 30 galaxies — are a bevy of much smaller affects the fate of the other. Milky Way and Andromeda formed close satellite galaxies. The satellites cluster near Evidence of the dynamical connection to each other, during the dense, early stages the Milky Way or Andromeda like celebrity between the Milky Way and Andromeda of the universe. Subsequently, they were entourages. Thus, the Milky Way and comes from their relative motion. The gal- pulled apart by the general cosmological expansion. Later, the Milky Way and Abraham Loeb is professor of astronomy at Harvard University, a visiting professor at the Andromeda reversed their outward paths Weizmann Institute of Science, and director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the owing to mutual gravitational attraction. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. T.J. Cox is a postdoctoral fellow at the Institute Since then, they have now traced out nearly for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. a full orbit of each other. 26 Astronomy ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ June 08 The timing argument, along with knowledge of the current separation, rela- tive velocity, the age of the universe, yields an estimated total mass for the Local Group of more than 3 trillion times the Sun’s mass (solar-masses). In addition, it suggests the Milky Way and Andromeda will make a close pass in about 4 billion years. The mass estimate, in particular, generated significant amount of interest at the time, because it is more than 10 times the mass of all visible matter. This result became one of the first pieces of evidence for the existence of dark matter. Kahn and Woltjer inspired a generation of studies that further constrained the mass of the local group and revealed important FROM EARTH, we see the Milky Way from an insider’s perspective. Only one of the galaxy’s characteristics of Andromeda’s orbit, such spiral arms is visible. JOHN CHUMACK as its total energy of motion, or “angular momentum.” But the timing argument does structure of the galaxies, but the sheer yields. This implies there is additional mass not have the ability to follow the complex number of atoms of matter interacting over in the Local Group. The missing mass dynamics that accompany the merger of time makes it difficult or impossible to turned out to be the diffuse “intergalactic extended galaxies. Therefore, it cannot pre- solve without massive computer power. medium” of atoms, gas, and dust between dict the future arrangement of the Local To simulate the evolution of the Local the galaxies. Galaxies are simply the visible Group. For processes as complex as galaxy Group, first we construct a physical model peaks of massive icebergs of matter. Much mergers, astronomers need more powerful describing its present state. This task is of the mass is not readily apparent, just as tools: supercomputers. straightforward for the Milky Way and most of an iceberg’s bulk lies beneath the Andromeda, since several decades of obser- waves. Simulating the Local Group vations enable us to estimate the amount of Numerical simulations are an indispensable gas and stars involved and the contribution When galaxies collide tool to understand astronomical processes from dark matter. Combined with cosmo- After we construct a model that includes all too complex to solve with pen and paper. A logical simulations, a plausible mass model the stars, gas, and dark matter in the Local perfect example is the merger of two galax- for the Milky Way and Andromeda can be Group, we evolve the system over time in a ies. Simple gravitational forces govern the determined to well beyond the visible inner computer and see what happens. Full- portion of each galaxy. scale simulations typically require 2 weeks However, the combined mass of the of number crunching, using the equivalent Sextans B Sextans A Milky Way and Andromeda is still less than of 16 fully loaded desktop computers. nearly every number the timing argument Galaxy interactions are spectacular The IN THE LOCAL GROUP OF GALAXIES, the Milky Way, Andromeda Local Group (M31), and the Pinwheel Galaxy (M33) are the largest in the group. Dozens of smaller satellite galaxies accompany them. The group’s of galaxies Leo A members are all bound by mutual gravitational attraction. It’s total NGC 3109 filled space spans 6 million light-years. ASTRONOMY: ROEN KELLY NGC 147 FPO Milky Way Sextans Dwarf IC 10 LMC SMC Sagittarius Dwarf NGC 185 Fornax Dwarf NGC 205 Andromeda (M31) NGC 6822 Pinwheel M32 (M33) 1 million light-years IC 1613 www.Astronomy.com 27 GALAXY MERGERS IN CYBERSPACE Astronomer astronomers don’t simulate galaxy mergers just to create Cox’ web site, depict the complex merger of the Milky Way and Androm- pretty pictures. The simulations are experiments to test hypotheses about eda. These frames highlight important features of the galaxies and the how mergers work whether they are a significant process in the formation merger process. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MERGER imagES BY T.J. COX (HARVARD-SMITHSONIAN SFA) and evolution of galaxies. These images, taken for an animated film on T.J 2 billion years 2.5 billion years 4.5 billion years 5.5 billion years from now from now from now from now 2 biLLION YEARS from the pres- IN 2.5 biLLION YEARS, the IN 4.5 biLLION YEARS, the galax- IN 5.5 biLLION YEARS, Milkom- ent, the galaxies loop around galaxies are still moving ies loop around again and come eda is born. Tidal swirls,tails, each other in a close pass. Mutual apart. A ghostly bridge of back together to finally merge. and eddies left over from the attraction draws tenuous “tidal gas and stars connects the Their dense cores, each harboring violent merger slowly relax and tails” of stars and gas.
Recommended publications
  • Unusual Orbits in the Andromeda Galaxy Post-16
    Unusual orbits in the Andromeda galaxy Post-16 Topics covered: spectra, Doppler effect, Newton’s law of gravitation, galaxy rotation curves, arc lengths, cosmological units, dark matter Teacher’s Notes In this activity students will use real scientific data to plot the rotation curve of M31 (Andromeda), our neighbouring spiral galaxy. They will use Kepler’s third law to predict the motion of stars around the centre of M31. They will then measure the wavelengths of hydrogen emission spectra taken at a range of radii. The Doppler equation will be used to determine whether these spectra come from the approaching or receding limb of the galaxy and the velocity of rotation at that point. They will plot a velocity vs radius graph and compare it with their predicted result. A flat rotation curve indicates the presence of dark matter within Andromeda. Equipment: calculator, ruler, graph paper (if needed) Questions to ask the class before the activity: What is the Universe composed of? Answer: energy, luminous matter, dark matter, dark energy. What is a spectrum and how so we get spectral lines? Answer: a ‘fingerprint’ of an object made of light. The spectrum of visible light is composed of the colours of the rainbow. Absorption lines arise from electrons absorbing photons of light and jumping an energy level or levels; emission lines occur when electrons fall down to a lower energy level and emit a photon in the process. What can a spectrum tell us? Answer: the composition of an object such as a star, its temperature, its pressure, the abundance of elements in the star, its motion (velocity).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry and Kinematics of Stars in Local Group Galaxies
    Chemistry and kinematics of stars in Local Group galaxies Giuseppina Battaglia ESO Garching In collaboration with DART (E.Tolstoy, M.Irwin, A.Helmi, V.Hill, B.Letarte, P.Jablonka, K.Venn, M.Shetrone, N.Arimoto, F.Primas, A.Kaufer, T. Szeifert, P. François,T.Abel) Dwarf spheroidal galaxies Small (half-light radius= 0.1-1kpc), devoid of gas, pressure supported SSccuulplpttoorr FFoorrnnaaxx Typical dSph Unusual dSph • Distance: 79 kpc • Distance: 138 kpc • Faint (Lv~ 10^6 Lsun) • Most luminous (Lv~10^7 Lsun) and and metal poor metal rich of MW satellites SFHs from Grebel, Gallagher & Harbeck 2007 (see also Monkiewicz et al. 1999, Stetson et al. 1998, Buonanno et al.1999, Saviane et al. 2000) Time [Gyr] Time [Gyr] Motivation • Galaxy formation on the smallest scales – Evolution and distribution of stellar populations – Chemical enrichment histories – All dSphs contain > 10 Gyr old stars => early universe • Most dark-matter dominated galaxies – Measure dark-matter distribution – Constrain the nature of dark-matter (warm, cold...) • Galaxy formation: building blocks of large galaxies? TThhee LLooccaall GGrroouupp Grebel et al. 2000 Large Dwarf ellipticals (dE); Dwarf irregulars dSphs/dIrrs spirals dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) (dIrr) dI rr Large majority DDAARRTT LLaarrggee PPrrooggrraamm aatt EESSOO • 4 dSphs in the MW halo: Sextans, Sculptor, Fornax, Carina (HR only) • Extended ESO/WFI imaging (CMD) probable members • VLT/FLAMES Low Resolution (LR) X probable non members spectra of 100s Red Giant Branch (RGB) stars in CaII triplet (CaT) region
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7: the Local Group and Nearby Clusters
    Lecture 7: the Local Group and nearby clusters • in this lecture we move up in scale, to explore typical clusters of galaxies – the Local Group is an example of a not very rich cluster • interesting topics include: – clusters and the structure of the Universe – the fate of galaxies: stable, destroyed or cannibals? Galaxies – AS 3011 1 the Local Group Galaxies – AS 3011 2 1 Inner Solar System Galaxies – AS 3011 3 Galaxies – AS 3011 4 2 some Local Group galaxies, roughly to the same physical scale: M31, Leo I LMC, M32 SMC MW M33 (images courtesy AAO) Galaxies – AS 3011 5 first impressions • there are some obvious properties of the Local Group: – it’s mostly empty, i.e. galaxies are quite distant from each other – with some exceptions like satellite galaxies – the three spirals are easily the biggest – dwarf galaxies are on the outskirts of the group • how typical is this of other galaxy groups? – turns out that the Local group is not very rich in galaxies Galaxies – AS 3011 6 3 groups and clusters • groups contain a smaller number of galaxies than clusters, and are more compact in both space and velocity spread: group: cluster: no. galaxies ~10+ >50 core radius ~300 kpc ~300 kpc median radius ~1 Mpc ~ 3Mpc v-dispersion 150 km/s 800 km/s M/L ~200 ~200 13 15 total mass few 10 Msolar few 10 Msolar Galaxies – AS 3011 7 classifying the Local Group • the Local Group has only about 10 significant galaxies 8 (L > 10 Lsolar), so does not qualify as a cluster – NB, dwarf spheroidals etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances to Local Group Galaxies
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Distances to Local Group Galaxies Alistair R. Walker Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, NOAO, Casilla 603, la Serena, Chile Abstract. Distances to galaxies in the Local Group are reviewed. In particular, the distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud is found to be (m M)0 =18:52 0:10, cor- − ± responding to 50; 600 2; 400 pc. The importance of M31 as an analog of the galaxies observed at greater distances± is stressed, while the variety of star formation and chem- ical enrichment histories displayed by Local Group galaxies allows critical evaluation of the calibrations of the various distance indicators in a variety of environments. 1 Introduction The Local Group (hereafter LG) of galaxies has been comprehensively described in the monograph by Sidney van den Berg [1], with update in [2]. The zero- velocity surface has radius of a little more than 1 Mpc, therefore the small sub-group of galaxies consisting of NGC 3109, Antlia, Sextans A and Sextans B lie outside the the LG by this definition, as do galaxies in the direction of the nearby Sculptor and IC342/Maffei groups. Thus the LG consists of two large spirals (the Galaxy and M31) each with their entourage of 11 and 10 smaller galaxies respectively, the dwarf spiral M33, and 13 other galaxies classified as either irregular or spherical. We have here included NGC 147 and NGC 185 as members of the M31 sub-group [60], whether they are actually bound to M31 is not proven.
    [Show full text]
  • Messier Objects
    Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Astronomy from Darkness to Blazing Glory
    Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory Published by JAS Educational Publications Copyright Pending 2010 JAS Educational Publications All rights reserved. Including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Second Edition Author: Jeffrey Wright Scott Photographs and Diagrams: Credit NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USGS, NOAA, Aames Research Center JAS Educational Publications 2601 Oakdale Road, H2 P.O. Box 197 Modesto California 95355 1-888-586-6252 Website: http://.Introastro.com Printing by Minuteman Press, Berkley, California ISBN 978-0-9827200-0-4 1 Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory The moon Titan is in the forefront with the moon Tethys behind it. These are two of many of Saturn’s moons Credit: Cassini Imaging Team, ISS, JPL, ESA, NASA 2 Introduction to Astronomy Contents in Brief Chapter 1: Astronomy Basics: Pages 1 – 6 Workbook Pages 1 - 2 Chapter 2: Time: Pages 7 - 10 Workbook Pages 3 - 4 Chapter 3: Solar System Overview: Pages 11 - 14 Workbook Pages 5 - 8 Chapter 4: Our Sun: Pages 15 - 20 Workbook Pages 9 - 16 Chapter 5: The Terrestrial Planets: Page 21 - 39 Workbook Pages 17 - 36 Mercury: Pages 22 - 23 Venus: Pages 24 - 25 Earth: Pages 25 - 34 Mars: Pages 34 - 39 Chapter 6: Outer, Dwarf and Exoplanets Pages: 41-54 Workbook Pages 37 - 48 Jupiter: Pages 41 - 42 Saturn: Pages 42 - 44 Uranus: Pages 44 - 45 Neptune: Pages 45 - 46 Dwarf Planets, Plutoids and Exoplanets: Pages 47 -54 3 Chapter 7: The Moons: Pages: 55 - 66 Workbook Pages 49 - 56 Chapter 8: Rocks and Ice:
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • 1410.0681V1.Pdf
    ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 05/12/14 THE QUENCHING OF THE ULTRA-FAINT DWARF GALAXIES IN THE REIONIZATION ERA1 THOMAS M. BROWN2, JASON TUMLINSON2, MARLA GEHA3, JOSHUA D. SIMON4,LUIS C. VARGAS3,DON A. VANDENBERG5,EVAN N. KIRBY6, JASON S. KALIRAI2,7,ROBERTO J. AVILA2, MARIO GENNARO2,HENRY C. FERGUSON2 RICARDO R. MUÑOZ8,PURAGRA GUHATHAKURTA9, AND ALVIO RENZINI10 Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal ABSTRACT We present new constraints on the star formation histories of six ultra-faint dwarf galaxies: Bootes I, Canes Venatici II, Coma Berenices, Hercules, Leo IV, and Ursa Major I. Our analysis employs a combination of high-precision photometry obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope, medium-resolutionspectroscopy obtained with the DEep Imaging Multi-Object Spectrograph on the W.M. Keck Observatory, and updated Victoria-Regina isochrones tailored to the abundance patterns appropriate for these galaxies. The data for five of these Milky Way satellites are best fit by a star formation history where at least 75% of the stars formed by z ∼ 10 (13.3 Gyr ago). All of the galaxies are consistent with 80% of the stars forming by z ∼ 6 (12.8 Gyr ago) and 100% of the stars forming by z ∼ 3 (11.6 Gyr ago). The similarly ancient populations of these galaxies support the hypothesis that star formation in the smallest dark matter sub-halos was suppressed by a global outside influence, such as the reionization of the universe. Keywords: Local Group — galaxies: dwarf — galaxies: photometry — galaxies: evolution — galaxies: for- mation — galaxies: stellar content 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extragalactic Distance Scale
    The Extragalactic Distance Scale Published in "Stellar astrophysics for the local group" : VIII Canary Islands Winter School of Astrophysics. Edited by A. Aparicio, A. Herrero, and F. Sanchez. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 1998 Calibration of the Extragalactic Distance Scale By BARRY F. MADORE1, WENDY L. FREEDMAN2 1NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database, Infrared Processing & Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2Observatories, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena CA 91101, USA The calibration and use of Cepheids as primary distance indicators is reviewed in the context of the extragalactic distance scale. Comparison is made with the independently calibrated Population II distance scale and found to be consistent at the 10% level. The combined use of ground-based facilities and the Hubble Space Telescope now allow for the application of the Cepheid Period-Luminosity relation out to distances in excess of 20 Mpc. Calibration of secondary distance indicators and the direct determination of distances to galaxies in the field as well as in the Virgo and Fornax clusters allows for multiple paths to the determination of the absolute rate of the expansion of the Universe parameterized by the Hubble constant. At this point in the reduction and analysis of Key Project galaxies H0 = 72km/ sec/Mpc ± 2 (random) ± 12 [systematic]. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE LECTURES CEPHEIDS BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE OBSERVED PROPERTIES OF CEPHEID
    [Show full text]
  • What Is an Ultra-Faint Galaxy?
    What is an ultra-faint Galaxy? UCSB KITP Feb 16 2012 Beth Willman (Haverford College) ~ 1/10 Milky Way luminosity Large Magellanic Cloud, MV = -18 image credit: Yuri Beletsky (ESO) and APOD NGC 205, MV = -16.4 ~ 1/40 Milky Way luminosity image credit: www.noao.edu Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/300 Milky Way luminosity MV = -14.2 Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/2700 Milky Way luminosity MV = -11.9 Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/14,000 Milky Way luminosity MV = -10.1 ~ 1/40,000 Milky Way luminosity ~ 1/1,000,000 Milky Way luminosity Ursa Major 1 Finding Invisible Galaxies bright faint blue red Willman et al 2002, Walsh, Willman & Jerjen 2009; see also e.g. Koposov et al 2008, Belokurov et al. Finding Invisible Galaxies Red, bright, cool bright Blue, hot, bright V-band apparent brightness V-band faint Red, faint, cool blue red From ARAA, V26, 1988 Willman et al 2002, Walsh, Willman & Jerjen 2009; see also e.g. Koposov et al 2008, Belokurov et al. Finding Invisible Galaxies Ursa Major I dwarf 1/1,000,000 MW luminosity Willman et al 2005 ~ 1/1,000,000 Milky Way luminosity Ursa Major 1 CMD of Ursa Major I Okamoto et al 2008 Distribution of the Milky Wayʼs dwarfs -14 Milky Way dwarfs 107 -12 -10 classical dwarfs V -8 5 10 Sun M L -6 ultra-faint dwarfs Canes Venatici II -4 Leo V Pisces II Willman I 1000 -2 Segue I 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitator Information – Galaxies
    Facilitator Information (All you need to know about galaxies to survive the day) What is a galaxy? Galaxies are large collections of stars and gas and dust. They have millions to billions of stars, all held into a cluster by gravitational attraction. Most galaxies are flat, but there are different shapes — some are spirals, some are elliptical, and some are irregular. Our Galaxy The Milky Way is a galaxy, a slowly rotating cluster of more than 200,000,000,000 stars! Our Milky Way Galaxy looks a little like a pinwheel. It is a spiral galaxy, about 100,000 light years across. Spiral galaxies have: a bulge in the center (called the nuclear bulge) that contains the nucleus; a wide, flat disk with distinct spiral arms containing stars; and a surrounding halo of stars. There are several “spiral arms” in our Milky Way: Sagittarius, Cygnus, Perseus, and Orion. Where are we in the Milky Way Galaxy? We are in one of the spiral arms, about 30,000 light years from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy — or about two-thirds of the way from the center. Can you see the Milky Way? Yes! On a very dark night, away from bright lights, you can see a faint, hazy — or milky — band in the sky. This is the Milky Way. The hazy appearance is because there so many stars that are very distant; your eye cannot distinguish the stars as separate points of light. By using binoculars or a telescope, you can see the individual stars. The Milky Way is like a big, flat disk in space.
    [Show full text]
  • The Andromeda Galaxy's Most Important Merger
    The Andromeda Galaxy’s most important merger ~ 2 Gyrs ago as M32’s likely progenitor Richard D’Souza* & Eric F. Bell Although the Andromeda Galaxy’s (M31) proximity offers a singular opportunity to understand how mergers affect galaxies1, uncertainty remains about M31’s most important mergers. Previous studies focused individually on the giant stellar stream2 or the impact of M32 on M31’s disk3,4, thereby suggesting many significant satellite interactions5. Yet, models of M31’s disk heating6 and the similarity between the stellar populations of different tidal substructures in M31’s outskirts7 both suggested a single large merger. M31’s outer low- surface brightness regions (its stellar halo) is built up from the tidal debris of satellites5 and provides decisive guidance about its important mergers8. Here we use cosmological models of galaxy formation9,10 to show that M31’s massive11 and metal-rich12 stellar halo, containing intermediate-age stars7, dramatically narrows the range of allowed interactions, requiring a 10 single dominant merger with a large galaxy (M*~2.5x10 M¤, the third largest member of the Local Group) ~2 Gyr ago. This single event explains many observations that were previously considered separately: its compact and metal-rich satellite M3213 is likely to be the stripped core of the disrupted galaxy, M31’s rotating inner stellar halo14 contains most of the merger debris, and the giant stellar stream15 is likely to have been thrown out during the merger. This interaction may explain M31’s global burst of star formation ~2 Gyr ago16 in which ~1/5 of its stars were formed.
    [Show full text]