Lecture 7: the Local Group and Nearby Clusters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lecture 7: the Local Group and Nearby Clusters Lecture 7: the Local Group and nearby clusters • in this lecture we move up in scale, to explore typical clusters of galaxies – the Local Group is an example of a not very rich cluster • interesting topics include: – clusters and the structure of the Universe – the fate of galaxies: stable, destroyed or cannibals? Galaxies – AS 3011 1 the Local Group Galaxies – AS 3011 2 1 Inner Solar System Galaxies – AS 3011 3 Galaxies – AS 3011 4 2 some Local Group galaxies, roughly to the same physical scale: M31, Leo I LMC, M32 SMC MW M33 (images courtesy AAO) Galaxies – AS 3011 5 first impressions • there are some obvious properties of the Local Group: – it’s mostly empty, i.e. galaxies are quite distant from each other – with some exceptions like satellite galaxies – the three spirals are easily the biggest – dwarf galaxies are on the outskirts of the group • how typical is this of other galaxy groups? – turns out that the Local group is not very rich in galaxies Galaxies – AS 3011 6 3 groups and clusters • groups contain a smaller number of galaxies than clusters, and are more compact in both space and velocity spread: group: cluster: no. galaxies ~10+ >50 core radius ~300 kpc ~300 kpc median radius ~1 Mpc ~ 3Mpc v-dispersion 150 km/s 800 km/s M/L ~200 ~200 13 15 total mass few 10 Msolar few 10 Msolar Galaxies – AS 3011 7 classifying the Local Group • the Local Group has only about 10 significant galaxies 8 (L > 10 Lsolar), so does not qualify as a cluster – NB, dwarf spheroidals etc. are not detectable at large distances, so don’t make up part of the total galaxy count for the Local Group • about half of known galaxies are in groups and clusters – these are dense enough to halt cosmological expansion locally, and so the galaxies remain bound to each other • the other half of galaxies are loosely spread out in large filaments and ‘walls’ – part of the large-scale structure of the Universe; may still be collapsing into clusters Galaxies – AS 3011 8 4 mapping the structure • to turn a map of the sky into a 3-D picture of the Local Group, we need galaxy distances – Hubble’s law does not apply within the Group because expansion has halted • need to remember that the uncertainty in the distance is ~10% even for bright galaxies – e.g. for the LMC, the range found for (m – M) is 18.1 to 18.8 – from -5 log d formula, this makes a 40% difference in the distance! • for dSph, distances could be uncertain by factor of ~2 Galaxies – AS 3011 9 • for the LMC, some of the methods just aren’t very reliable (not enough stars of a particular type, for example)... best estimates constrain absolute magnitude to ~0.1, or 5% in the distance Galaxies – AS 3011 10 5 galaxies in the Local Group • adding up those within 1 Mpc of the Milky Way: – 4 spirals (MW, M31, M33, LMC) – 1 elliptical (M32) – 3 dwarf ellipticals (NGC 147, 185, 205) – 3 irregulars (SMC, IC 10, NGC 6822) 5 8 – 25 dSph/dIrr (with L of 2 × 10 to 10 Lsolar) • this is rather different from typical large clusters – in core regions, proportions 10% / 40% / 50% in spirals / ellipticals / lenticulars – in outer regions of a cluster, 80% / 10% / 10% in spirals / ellipticals /lenticulars Galaxies – AS 3011 11 nearby clusters Galaxies – AS 3011 12 Richard Powell - http://www.anzwers.org/free/universe/ 6 supergalactic plane • there is a local ‘wall’ called the supergalactic plane in which many of the clusters within ~100 Mpc lie – top diagram is looking down on the plane – bottom diagram is looking along it – mesh regions have >50% more than mean density of galaxies Galaxies – AS 3011 Hudson (1993) 13 Layout of the Local Group Galaxies – AS 3011 14 7 well known clusters • some of the richest clusters are the two in the constellations of Virgo (at 15-20 Mpc) and Coma Berenices (at ~100 Mpc) images: Astronomy Picture of the Day Galaxies – AS 3011 15 velocities in a group • the mutual gravitaitonal pulls of the galaxies hold them together as a group – the group must have assembled fairly early on, or the expansion of the Universe would have spread galaxies out more evenly • several kinds of motions are possible – stable orbits around the group – infall of two galaxies onto each other – destruction of a small galaxy due to tides induced by a bigger one • our Galaxy and M31 are approaching each at ~120 km/s Galaxies – AS 3011 16 8 sub-structure • some galaxies in the LG are bound to the Milky Way, some to Andromeda, and some neither: – companions of MW: LMC (0.05 Mpc), SMC (0.06 Mpc), various dSph (0.025 Mpc to 0.27 Mpc) – companions of M31 (0.77 Mpc from MW): M32 (0.75 Mpc), three dE (NGC 147, 185, 205 at 0.6 to 0.85 Mpc) various dSph in Andromeda (0.6-0.8 Mpc) Galaxies – AS 3011 17 fates of galaxies • ‘near misses’ can perturb galaxies, e.g. send density waves through the gas – this leads to new bursts of star formation, perhaps as seen in the LMC irregular spiral • strong interactions can destroy galaxies as discrete entitities – some originally in the Local Group are now gone, all we see now are ‘tidal streams’ Galaxies – AS 3011 18 9 stability and dark matter • dark matter can help to hold a galaxy together, when the mass in visible stars isn’t enough to explain why it has survived – compare the Carina dSph to the globular cluster ω Cen – σ is 3x higher in ω Cen, but Rcore is 40x higher in Car – from the Virial Theorem, 2 KE + PE = 0, so approximately 2 2 σ = GM / Rcore, or (σCar / σCen ) = (MCar/MCen)(RCen/RCar) – which gives MCar ≈ 4 MCen 5 6 – but LCar = 2 x10 while LCen = 10 (!), so M/L is 20 times larger in the dSph galaxy than in the globular cluster Galaxies – AS 3011 19 stability and potential wells • the effects that destroy a satellite galaxy are basically tides • the maths for distortions of extended galaxies made up of many stars are hard, but we can picture the potential wells – start with the 5 Lagrangian points, which show stable positions e.g. for satellites launched from the Earth 60° Galaxies – AS 3011 20 10 losing stars • for extended objects like galaxies, we can picture the potential wells – consider where a star would be firmly attached to a big galaxy of mass M or its smaller companion of m – at the Lagrange points the star’s situation is unstable, and it may start to fall onto the other galaxy or out into intergalactic space L2 L1 L3 m M Galaxies – AS 3011 21 LMC and SMC • it turns out that the L1 and L2 points are at distances 1/3 xL = ± D [ m / 3M+m ] – where D is the distance separating the galaxies • for the LMC, for example, its circular velocity around our galaxy implies M(<50 kpc) ~ 5 × 1011 10 Msolar, while its own mass is ~ 10 Msolar 1/3 – so xL ~ ± 50 [ 1 / (3×10 + 1) ] ~ 11kpc – so as the galaxy radius is only 7 kpc, its stars will stay bound Galaxies – AS 3011 22 11 fate of dSph • on the outer slopes of the potential well, stars will drift away – in fact, the SMC turns out to be unbound to the LMC so is moving away • smaller galaxies can get torn apart – for example, the Sagittarius dSph is only 15 kpc from the centre of the Milky Way 11 – the MW rotation curve shows that ~10 Msolar lies within this radius 10 – the Sgr galaxy would need 10 Msolar to retain its own 7 stars, but has a luminosity of only 10 Lsolar – this means it will lose its stars (would need 1000 Msolar of dark matter for every 1 Msolar of stars to be stabilised) Galaxies – AS 3011 23 merger of Milky Way and M31 • the Milky Way and M31 dominate the Local Group but are not in a mutually stable orbit – a close pass occurs in 5 Gyr – possibly an actual collision – Sun could be ejected into simulation, see movie at intergalactic http://www.cita.utoronto.ca/~dubinski/tflops/ space (J Dubinksi) Galaxies – AS 3011 24 12 intergalactic stars • some evidence of intergalactic Planetary Nebulae in the Virgo cluster – too far away to see individual stars like the Sun, but they could be there artist’s sketch, looking back (NASA) Galaxies – AS 3011 25 13 .
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Astronomy from Darkness to Blazing Glory
    Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory Published by JAS Educational Publications Copyright Pending 2010 JAS Educational Publications All rights reserved. Including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Second Edition Author: Jeffrey Wright Scott Photographs and Diagrams: Credit NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USGS, NOAA, Aames Research Center JAS Educational Publications 2601 Oakdale Road, H2 P.O. Box 197 Modesto California 95355 1-888-586-6252 Website: http://.Introastro.com Printing by Minuteman Press, Berkley, California ISBN 978-0-9827200-0-4 1 Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory The moon Titan is in the forefront with the moon Tethys behind it. These are two of many of Saturn’s moons Credit: Cassini Imaging Team, ISS, JPL, ESA, NASA 2 Introduction to Astronomy Contents in Brief Chapter 1: Astronomy Basics: Pages 1 – 6 Workbook Pages 1 - 2 Chapter 2: Time: Pages 7 - 10 Workbook Pages 3 - 4 Chapter 3: Solar System Overview: Pages 11 - 14 Workbook Pages 5 - 8 Chapter 4: Our Sun: Pages 15 - 20 Workbook Pages 9 - 16 Chapter 5: The Terrestrial Planets: Page 21 - 39 Workbook Pages 17 - 36 Mercury: Pages 22 - 23 Venus: Pages 24 - 25 Earth: Pages 25 - 34 Mars: Pages 34 - 39 Chapter 6: Outer, Dwarf and Exoplanets Pages: 41-54 Workbook Pages 37 - 48 Jupiter: Pages 41 - 42 Saturn: Pages 42 - 44 Uranus: Pages 44 - 45 Neptune: Pages 45 - 46 Dwarf Planets, Plutoids and Exoplanets: Pages 47 -54 3 Chapter 7: The Moons: Pages: 55 - 66 Workbook Pages 49 - 56 Chapter 8: Rocks and Ice:
    [Show full text]
  • 1410.0681V1.Pdf
    ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 05/12/14 THE QUENCHING OF THE ULTRA-FAINT DWARF GALAXIES IN THE REIONIZATION ERA1 THOMAS M. BROWN2, JASON TUMLINSON2, MARLA GEHA3, JOSHUA D. SIMON4,LUIS C. VARGAS3,DON A. VANDENBERG5,EVAN N. KIRBY6, JASON S. KALIRAI2,7,ROBERTO J. AVILA2, MARIO GENNARO2,HENRY C. FERGUSON2 RICARDO R. MUÑOZ8,PURAGRA GUHATHAKURTA9, AND ALVIO RENZINI10 Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal ABSTRACT We present new constraints on the star formation histories of six ultra-faint dwarf galaxies: Bootes I, Canes Venatici II, Coma Berenices, Hercules, Leo IV, and Ursa Major I. Our analysis employs a combination of high-precision photometry obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope, medium-resolutionspectroscopy obtained with the DEep Imaging Multi-Object Spectrograph on the W.M. Keck Observatory, and updated Victoria-Regina isochrones tailored to the abundance patterns appropriate for these galaxies. The data for five of these Milky Way satellites are best fit by a star formation history where at least 75% of the stars formed by z ∼ 10 (13.3 Gyr ago). All of the galaxies are consistent with 80% of the stars forming by z ∼ 6 (12.8 Gyr ago) and 100% of the stars forming by z ∼ 3 (11.6 Gyr ago). The similarly ancient populations of these galaxies support the hypothesis that star formation in the smallest dark matter sub-halos was suppressed by a global outside influence, such as the reionization of the universe. Keywords: Local Group — galaxies: dwarf — galaxies: photometry — galaxies: evolution — galaxies: for- mation — galaxies: stellar content 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake in the Clouds: a New Nearby Dwarf Galaxy in the Magellanic Bridge ∗ Sergey E
    MNRAS 000, 1{21 (2018) Preprint 19 April 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Snake in the Clouds: A new nearby dwarf galaxy in the Magellanic bridge ∗ Sergey E. Koposov,1;2 Matthew G. Walker,1 Vasily Belokurov,2;3 Andrew R. Casey,4;5 Alex Geringer-Sameth,y6 Dougal Mackey,7 Gary Da Costa,7 Denis Erkal8, Prashin Jethwa9, Mario Mateo,10, Edward W. Olszewski11 and John I. Bailey III12 1McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, 15213, USA 2Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley road, CB3 0HA, UK 3Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, 162 5th Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA 4School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia 5Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia 6Astrophysics Group, Physics Department, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Rd, London SW7 2AZ, UK 7Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia 8Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK 9European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany 10Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 311 West Hall, 1085 S University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 11Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Avenue., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 12Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT We report the discovery of a nearby dwarf galaxy in the constellation of Hydrus, between the Large and the Small Magellanic Clouds. Hydrus 1 is a mildy elliptical ultra-faint system with luminosity MV 4:7 and size 50 pc, located 28 kpc from the Sun and 24 kpc from the LMC.
    [Show full text]
  • Ml Driven Prediction of Collision of Milky Way & Andromeda
    International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8 Issue-3, September 2019 Ml Driven Prediction of Collision of Milky Way & Andromeda Ansh Mittal, Anusurya, Deepika Kumar, Garima Kumar Abstract: The 3D position of Sun with respect to the galactic center of Milky Way can be used to understand its evolution. After Milky Way collides with Andromeda(M31), the same will hold true. Ensuing sections deal with the implementation of Regressive Analysis to predict the location of Sun in the galactic center after Galactic collision. This model utilizes results of previous studies of black hole mergers to predict the resultant mass of Sagittarius A* and M31’s black hole, which had been found to be (1.49±0.16) × Figure 1: Different types of Collisions between two 8 10 M☉. This mass has been used to calculate the centrifugal force galaxies as has been mentioned in [5] that Sun might experience during and after the galactic collision. The current position, inclination, and velocity of Sun (derived Galaxies may be of various types [7] like the dark galaxy, from aforementioned predictions) have been used to predict its Type CD galaxy, Type D galaxy, and Ultra Diffuse galaxy. distance and inclination after the collision which has been Out of these galaxies, UDG or the ultra-diffuse galaxy had o predicted as 63,362.83 ly and 32.75 , from the new galactic center been a galaxy which has very low luminosity. Although Milky and its plane (97.48% and 96.32% accurate) respectively. way and UDG galaxy share the same mass and size, only 1% Index Terms: Sun, Milky Way, Andromeda(M31), Regression of the visible star count has been observed there for UDG Analysis, Galactic collision, Sagittarius A*.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Enrichment by Individual SN from Elemental Abundance Ratios in the Very Metal-Poor Dsph Galaxy Boötes I
    A&A 508, L1–L4 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912833 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics Letter to the Editor Evidence of enrichment by individual SN from elemental abundance ratios in the very metal-poor dSph galaxy Boötes I S. Feltzing1,K.Eriksson2, J. Kleyna3, and M. I. Wilkinson4 1 Lund Observatory, Box 43, 221 00 Lund, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Astronomy and Space Physics, Uppsala University, Box 515, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] 3 Institute for Astronomy, Honululu, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK e-mail: [email protected] Received 6 July 2009 / Accepted 18 September 2009 ABSTRACT Aims. We establish the mean metallicity from high-resolution spectroscopy for the recently found dwarf spheroidal galaxy Boötes I and test whether it is a common feature for ultra-faint dwarf spheroidal galaxies to show signs of inhomogeneous chemical evolution (e.g. as found in the Hercules dwarf spheroidal galaxy). Methods. We analyse high-resolution, moderate signal-to-noise spectra for seven red giant stars in the Boötes I dSph galaxy using standard abundance analysis techniques. In particular, we assume local thermodynamic equilibrium and employ spherical model atmospheres and codes that take the sphericity of the star into account when calculating the elemental abundances. Results. We confirm previous determinations of the mean metallicity of the Boötes I dwarf spheroidal galaxy to be −2.3 dex. Whilst five stars are clustered around this metallicity, one is significantly more metal-poor, at −2.9 dex, and one is more metal-rich at, −1.9 dex.
    [Show full text]
  • Never-Before-Seen Radio Waves Detected from Nearby Stars and Distant Galaxies 19 August 2021
    Never-before-seen radio waves detected from nearby stars and distant galaxies 19 August 2021 The researchers not only took the sharpest radio images of the Cloud ever recorded, but during their analysis they also studied the stars themselves which form the cloud's structure, including the Tarantula Nebula, the most active star-formation region in the Local Group. Furthermore, newly detected radio emission has also been studied from distant galaxies in the background as well as stars in the foreground from our own Milky Way. This study, published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, forms part of the Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) Early Science Project, which will observe the entire Southern sky and is predicted to detect around 40 Credit: Keele University million galaxies. The data will ultimately be used to give researchers a clearer picture of how galaxies, and their stars, have evolved throughout time. Scientists have measured thousands of nearby Lead author Clara Pennock from Keele University stars and far away galaxies that have never been said: "The sharp and sensitive new image reveals identified before at radio wavelengths, while thousands of radio sources we've never seen studying a galactic body that neighbors our own before. Most of these are actually galaxies millions Milky Way galaxy—the Large Magellanic Cloud. or even billions of light years beyond the Large Magellanic Cloud. We typically see them because Led by Keele University Ph.D. student Clara M. of the supermassive black holes in their centers Pennock and Reader in Astrophysics, Dr. Jacco which can be detected at all wavelengths, van Loon, the international team of researchers especially radio.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Youngest and Most Massive Stars in the Tarantula Nebula with MUSE-NFM
    Astronomical Science DOI: 10.18727/0722-6691/5223 Mapping the Youngest and Most Massive Stars in the Tarantula Nebula with MUSE-NFM Norberto Castro 1 Myrs, but in very dramatic ways. The are to unveil the nature of the most mas- Martin M. Roth 1 energy released during their short lives, sive stars, to constrain the role of these Peter M. Weilbacher 1 and their deaths in supernova explosions, parameters in their evolution, and to pro- Genoveva Micheva 1 shape the chemistry and dynamics of vide homogeneous results and landmarks Ana Monreal-Ibero 2, 3 their host galaxies. Ever since the reioni- for the theory. Spectroscopic surveys Andreas Kelz1 sation of the Universe, massive stars have transformed the field in this direc- Sebastian Kamann4 have been significant sources of ionisa- tion, yielding large samples for detailed Michael V. Maseda 5 tion. Nonetheless, the evolution of mas- quantitative studies in the Milky Way (for Martin Wendt 6 sive O- and B-type stars is far from being example, Simón-Díaz et al., 2017) and in and the MUSE collaboration well understood, a lack of knowledge that the nearby Magellanic Clouds (for exam- is even worse for the most massive stars ple, Evans et al., 2011). However, massive (Langer, 2012). These missing pieces in stars are rarer than smaller stars, and 1 Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam, our understanding of the formation and very massive stars (> 70 M☉) are even Germany evolution of massive stars propagate to rarer. The empirical distribution of stars 2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, other fields in astrophysics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tarantula Nebula As a Template for Extragalactic Star Forming Regions from VLT/MUSE and HST/STIS
    This is a repository copy of The Tarantula Nebula as a template for extragalactic star forming regions from VLT/MUSE and HST/STIS. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/112327/ Version: Accepted Version Proceedings Paper: Crowther, P.A., Caballero-Nieves, S.M., Castro, N. et al. (1 more author) (2016) The Tarantula Nebula as a template for extragalactic star forming regions from VLT/MUSE and HST/STIS. In: Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. IAUS 329: The Lives and Death-Throes of Massive Stars, 28 Nov - 02 Dec 2016, Auckland, New Zealand. Cambridge University Press , pp. 292-296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921317002484 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The lives and death-throes of massive stars Proceedings IAU Symposium No.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft181 182Chapter 10
    Chapter 10 Formation and evolution of the Local Group 480 Myr <t< 13.7 Gyr; 10 >z> 0; 30 K > T > 2.725 K The fact that the [G]alactic system is a member of a group is a very fortunate accident. Edwin Hubble, The Realm of the Nebulae Summary: The Local Group (LG) is the group of galaxies gravitationally associ- ated with the Galaxy and M 31. Galaxies within the LG have overcome the general expansion of the universe. There are approximately 75 galaxies in the LG within a 12 diameter of ∼3 Mpc having a total mass of 2-5 × 10 M⊙. A strong morphology- density relation exists in which gas-poor dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) are preferentially found closer to the Galaxy/M 31 than gas-rich dwarf irregulars (dIrrs). This is often promoted as evidence of environmental processes due to the massive Galaxy and M 31 driving the evolutionary change between dwarf galaxy types. High Veloc- ity Clouds (HVCs) are likely to be either remnant gas left over from the formation of the Galaxy, or associated with other galaxies that have been tidally disturbed by the Galaxy. Our Galaxy halo is about 12 Gyr old. A thin disk with ongoing star formation and older thick disk built by z ≥ 2 minor mergers exist. The Galaxy and M 31 will merge in 5.9 Gyr and ultimately resemble an elliptical galaxy. The LG has −1 vLG = 627 ± 22 km s with respect to the CMB. About 44% of the LG motion is due to the infall into the region of the Great Attractor, and the remaining amount of motion is due to more distant overdensities between 130 and 180 h−1 Mpc, primarily the Shapley supercluster.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Collision Between the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy Master Thesis, Astronomy and Astrophysics
    On the collision between the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy Master thesis, astronomy and astrophysics J.C.J.G. Withagen Supervisors: dr. S. Portegies Zwart and dr. S. Harfst Sterrenkundig Instituut \Anton Pannekoek" Universiteit van Amsterdam Abstract This paper argues, that using a recent estimated transverse velocity component of Andromeda of vtrans = 42 km/s, it will influence the time of merger between the to systems considerably. We present several models of the Local Group, using models which are derived from distribu- tion functions of actual galaxies and evaluate them using N-body simulations. We preformed our simulations using Graphic Processing Cards. We find that the two galaxies are not likely to collide in at least 9 Gyr and will not form the elliptical galaxy Milkomeda. We present evidence that this time of merger could be much longer then 9 Gyr, Most likely in the order of two Hubble times. We also preformed a parameter study, varying vtrans, the total mass and the extent of Andromeda's halo, which resulted in constructing a parameter space we can use to test models with different total masses. Subject heading: dark matter - galaxies: individual (M31) Galaxy: general - Local Group - methods: N-body simulations i Preface This thesis covers the work done during my masters project as part of the fulfillment of the Masters degree in astronomy and astrophysics at the University of Amsterdam. This research project was done under the supervision of dr. S Portegies Zwart and dr. S Harfst at the astronomical institute "Anton Pannekoek" form September 2007 until August 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of the Galaxies in the Local Group Roeland Van Der Marel (Stsci)
    The Dynamics of the Galaxies in the Local Group Roeland van der Marel (STScI) Main collaborators: Jay Anderson, Gurtina Besla, Nitya Kallivayalil, Tony Sohn 2 [R. Powell] 3 [R. Powell] 4 Why Study the Local Group? • Nearest opportunity for study of fossil record of hierarchical structure formation in the Universe – Best spatial resolution • Many observational surveys – 2MASS/DENIS, SDSS, RAVE, GAIA, wide-field ground-based programs, etc. • Many recent insights – Continuous discovery of new dwarf galaxies, tidal streams, etc. • Structure, Dynamics and Populations of Galaxies ⇒ Formation and Evolution of Galaxies 5 Orbits: proper motions ⇒ Mass, History, Future Milky Way M31 SagDIG Tucana SMC Magellanic MW Stream satellites LMC M33 M31 satellites [Grebel 2000] 6 Proper Motion Measurement • Relevant proper motions are small • For 0.05” pixel size, 0.01 pixel in 5 years corresponds to 100 micro-arcsec/yr, which is – 3 km/s at 6.4 kpc – 30 km/s at 64 kpc – 300 km/s at 640 kpc • Space observations generally required: – HST: can do this now! – GAIA (2013-2018): bright stars in uncrowded regions – SIM: discontinued 7 HST proper motions • Essential properties: – Long-term stability – High spatial resolution – High S/N on faint sources (collecting area +low background) • Required tools (Jay Anderson): – Accurate geometric distortion calibrations – Accurate PSF models that allow for PSF variability – Software to fit PSFs optimized for astrometry – Understanding or correction for Charge Transfer Efficiency • Observational design: – Sub-pixel dithering
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomical Coordinate Systems
    Appendix 1 Astronomical Coordinate Systems A basic requirement for studying the heavens is being able to determine where in the sky things are located. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each sys- tem uses a coordinate grid projected on the celestial sphere, which is similar to the geographic coor- dinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth’s equator). Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The Equatorial Coordinate System The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the most closely related to the geographic coordinate system because they use the same funda- mental plane and poles. The projection of the Earth’s equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles onto the celestial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate sys- tems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth and rotates as the Earth does. The Equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but it’s really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec. for short). It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator.
    [Show full text]