DOCSLIB.ORG

Classical Model of a Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Classical Model of a Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser PHYSICAL REVIEW A 103, 062213 (2021) Classical model of a delayed-choice quantum eraser Brian R. La Cour * and Thomas W. Yudichak Applied Research Laboratories, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box 8029, Austin 78713-8029, Texas (Received 9 January 2021; accepted 27 May 2021; published 9 June 2021) Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment was conceived to illustrate the paradoxical nature of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics. In the experiment, quantum light can exhibit either wavelike interference patterns or particlelike anticorrelations, depending upon the (possibly delayed) choice of the experimenter. A variant known as the quantum eraser uses entangled light to recover the lost interference in a seemingly nonlocal and retrocausal manner. Although it is believed that this behavior is incompatible with classical physics, here we show that, using postselection, the observed quantum phenomena can be reproduced by adopting a simple deterministic detector model and supposing the existence of a random zero-point electromagnetic field. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.062213 I. INTRODUCTION iment, but it fails to describe a variant of this experiment using variable phase delays in the arms of the interferometer. Wave-particle duality is one of the oldest and most per- This variant has been the subject of recent experimental in- plexing aspects of quantum theory [1]. Although the wavelike vestigations, which are consistent with theoretical predictions nature of light had been well established by the 19th cen- [20–22]. These experiments place certain dimensional restric- tury, experiments of the early 20th century brought about tions on the class of nonretrocausal hidden-variable models the notion of light as a particle, what we now call a photon that can be consistent with theory and observations. [2–4]. Maintaining this notion of light as being composed of In this paper, we revisit Wheeler’s delayed-choice experi- discrete particles can, however, be rather paradoxical at times, ment, its recent experimental variants, and the more elaborate as numerous real and gedanken experiments have shown quantum eraser experiment within the context of a sim- [5–10]. ple, physically motivated classical model [23,24]. Although One particular experiment that has captured recent interest loophole-free experiments have already been performed to and attention is the delayed-choice quantum eraser. First con- rule out local realism [25–27], the identification of precisely ceived by Scully and Drühl in 1982 [11], the quantum eraser which phenomena defy a classical interpretation remains an is a variant of Wheeler’s delayed choice experiment in which open question and one of practical relevance to ensure the measurements on one of a pair of entangled light beams are security and efficacy of emergent quantum technologies. Our used to recover an interference pattern, and hence wavelike approach is modeled after stochastic electrodynamics (SED) behavior, that would otherwise be lost with the introduction in assuming a reified (i.e., nonvirtual) zero-point field (ZPF) of which-way path information in a Mach-Zehnder interfer- corresponding to the vacuum state [28,29]. A significant de- ometer [12–16]. For Wheeler, the delayed-choice experiment parture from standard SED in our approach is the introduction was an argument for antirealism, the notion that quantum of a deterministic model of detectors using an amplitude objects, such as photons, do not have definite, intrinsic prop- threshold crossing scheme. We find that these simple assump- erties that are independent of the measurement context [17]. tions, combined with standard experimental postselection and Some, however, have interpreted the results of delayed-choice data analysis techniques, adequately describe the observed quantum eraser experiments as evidence for a form of retro- quantum phenomena. causality [18]. The structure of the paper is as follows: In Sec. II we More recently, a series of delayed-choice experiments has consider a simple delayed-choice experiment using weak been performed that rule out a certain class of nonretrocausal coherent light as a notional single-photon source. We re- hidden-variable models described by Chaves, Lemos, and place the coherent light with a source of entangled light Pienaar [19]. The general model they describe can provide in Sec. III, within the context of a quantum eraser experi- a causal description of the standard delayed-choice exper- ment, and demonstrate how postselection, not causality, is the mechanism whereby path information is effectively erased. With these two results established, we revisit the theoretical *[email protected] arguments of Chaves and Bowles in Sec. V and argue that their assumptions are overly restrictive. Section VI considers Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the a variant of these experiments using entangled light sources Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further and shows that these, too, can be understood within a clas- distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) sical framework. Finally, we summarize our conclusions in and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Sec. VII. Figures and numerical experiments were created 2469-9926/2021/103(6)/062213(12) 062213-1 Published by the American Physical Society BRIAN R. LA COUR AND THOMAS W. YUDICHAK PHYSICAL REVIEW A 103, 062213 (2021) and performed using a custom simulation tool, the Virtual stacked Jones vectors as follows: Quantum Optics Laboratory (VQOL) [30]. ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ aH aH + bH ⎢ aV ⎥ ⎢aV + bV ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ BS1 1 ⎢ ⎥ ⎢−−⎥ −−→ √ ⎢−−−−⎥. (3) II. SIMPLE DELAYED-CHOICE EXPERIMENT ⎣ ⎦ 2⎣ ⎦ bH aH − bH Consider the Mach-Zehnder interferometer of Fig. 1.A bV aV − bV laser (LAS) provides a source of coherent, horizontally polar- Note that the second term on the right-hand side is again ized light that is strongly attenuated by a neutral density filter a standard complex Gaussian random vector, owing to the (NDF) before entering the first beam splitter (BS1). Under unitarity of the beam splitter transformation. our model, the laser light exiting the NDF is represented by The right-traveling beam next undergoes a transformation a stochastic Jones vector of the form via a half-wave plate (denoted by HWP) with a fast-axis angle θ ∈ [0,π/4] relative to the horizontal axis. It subsequently a α z a = H = + σ 1H , (1) undergoes a phase delay (denoted by PD) that applies a global a 0 0 z V 1V phase angle φ ∈ [0, 2π]. Finally, a pair of mirrors (denoted by M1 and M2) swap the two spatial modes. The resulting α ∈ where C describes√ the mean amplitude and phase of the stacked Jones vector after these three transformations is now light, σ0 = 1/ 2 is the scale of the ZPF (corresponding to ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ 1 a ω aH + bH H a modal energy of 2 h¯ ), and z1H and z1V are independent ⎢a + b ⎥ ⎢ a ⎥ standard complex Gaussian random variables. (We say that z 1 ⎢ V V ⎥ , , , ⎢ V ⎥ = √ ⎢−−−−⎥ −HWP−−−−−−−−−PD M1 M2→ ⎢−−⎥, is a standard complex Gaussian random variable if E[z] 0, ⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥ (4) 2 2 2 − ⎣ ⎦ E[|z| ] = 1, and E[z ] = 0). Note that z1H and z1V play the aH bH bH aV − bV role of hidden variables. This model is mathematically equiv- bV alent to the corresponding quantum coherent state |α⊗|0 √ √ = − / = − / whose Wigner function is a bivariate Gaussian probability where aH (aH bH ) 2, aV (aV bV ) 2, and density function identical to that of a. The fact that we are eiφ = √ θ + + θ + , using explicit random variables in our representation amounts bH [cos 2 (aH bH ) sin 2 (aV bV )] (5a) to a reification of the ZPF. The effect of the NDF is to ensure 2 |α| eiφ that 1. = √ θ + − θ + . / bV [sin 2 (aH bH ) cos 2 (aV bV )] (5b) Passage through the first 50 50 beam splitter (denoted by 2 BS1) splits the beam into two orthogonal spatial modes, a In the absence of the second beam splitter (denoted by right-traveling mode (denoted by →) and a down-traveling BS2), the Jones vectors (a , a )T and (b , b )T will deter- mode (denoted by ↓). In addition, there is a down-traveling H V H V mine if a detection is made on the right-traveling mode (by vacuum mode that enters the top input port of BS1, repre- detector D1) or the down-traveling mode (by detector D2). sented by the independent stochastic Jones vector We adopt an amplitude threshold crossing scheme as a model to determine whether a given detector makes a detection (or bH z2H b = = σ0 , (2) “clicks”) [23]. Under this scheme, a detector clicks if the bV z2V amplitude of either the horizontal or the vertical polarization component of the impinging beam falls above a given thresh- where z2H and z2V are independent standard complex Gaus- old, γ 0. sian random variables (which are also independent of z1H and Each detector has placed before it a polarizer (denoted by z1V ). The two spatial modes may be represented by a pair of P1 and P2) oriented to admit horizontally polarized light. A polarizer can be modeled as a polarizing beam splitter for which one of the output ports is ignored [31]. Consequently, an independent vacuum mode will be present in the second input port, resulting in the transformation a a H −P1→ H , σ (6) aV 0z1V where z1V is an independent standard complex Gaussian random variable corresponding to the vacuum mode of the notional second input port. Similarly, passage through P2 will result in the transformation b b H −P2→ H , σ (7) bV 0z2V where z2V is, again, an independent standard complex Gaus- FIG. 1. VQOL experimental setup for a simple delayed-choice sian random variable. experiment. The different colors (or shades of gray) in the beams Thus, detector D1 clicks, according to this model, if the correspond to different polarizations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:2002.00255V3 [Quant-Ph] 13 Feb 2021 Lem (BVP)
    A Path Integral approach to Quantum Fluid Dynamics Sagnik Ghosh Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune-411008, India Swapan K Ghosh UM-DAE Centre for Excellence in Basic Sciences, University of Mumbai, Kalina, Santacruz, Mumbai-400098, India ∗ (Dated: February 16, 2021) In this work we develop an alternative approach for solution of Quantum Trajectories using the Path Integral method. The state-of-the-art technique in the field is to solve a set of non-linear, coupled partial differential equations (PDEs) simultaneously. We opt for a fundamentally different route. We first derive a general closed form expression for the Path Integral propagator valid for any general potential as a functional of the corresponding classical path. The method is exact and is applicable in many dimensions as well as multi-particle cases. This, then, is used to compute the Quantum Potential (QP), which, in turn, can generate the Quantum Trajectories. For cases, where closed form solution is not possible, the problem is formally boiled down to solving the classical path as a boundary value problem. The work formally bridges the Path Integral approach with Quantum Fluid Dynamics. As a model application to illustrate the method, we work out a toy model viz. the double-well potential, where the boundary value problem for the classical path has been computed perturbatively, but the Quantum part is left exact. Using this we delve into seeking insight in one of the long standing debates with regard to Quantum Tunneling. Keywords: Path Integral, Quantum Fluid Dynamics, Analytical Solution, Quantum Potential, Quantum Tunneling, Quantum Trajectories Submitted to: J.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of the Bell Inequality Violation Based on Quantum Steering Concept Mohsen Ruzbehani
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Simulation of the Bell inequality violation based on quantum steering concept Mohsen Ruzbehani Violation of Bell’s inequality in experiments shows that predictions of local realistic models disagree with those of quantum mechanics. However, despite the quantum mechanics formalism, there are debates on how does it happen in nature. In this paper by use of a model of polarizers that obeys the Malus’ law and quantum steering concept, i.e. superluminal infuence of the states of entangled pairs to each other, simulation of phenomena is presented. The given model, as it is intended to be, is extremely simple without using mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics. However, the result completely agrees with prediction of quantum mechanics. Although it may seem trivial, this model can be applied to simulate the behavior of other not easy to analytically evaluate efects, such as defciency of detectors and polarizers, diferent value of photons in each run and so on. For example, it is demonstrated, when detector efciency is 83% the S factor of CHSH inequality will be 2, which completely agrees with famous detector efciency limit calculated analytically. Also, it is shown in one-channel polarizers the polarization of absorbed photons, should change to the perpendicular of polarizer angle, at very end, to have perfect violation of the Bell inequality (2 √2 ) otherwise maximum violation will be limited to (1.5 √2). More than a half-century afer celebrated Bell inequality 1, nonlocality is almost totally accepted concept which has been proved by numerous experiments. Although there is no doubt about validity of the mathematical model proposed by Bell to examine the principle of the locality, it is comprehended that Bell’s inequality in its original form is not testable.
    [Show full text]
  • Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications
    International Journal of Quantum Foundations 7 (2021) 47-78 Original Paper Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications Brian Drummond Edinburgh, Scotland. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 10 April 2021 / Accepted: 14 June 2021 / Published: 30 June 2021 Abstract: This short article concentrates on the conceptual aspects of the violation of Bell inequalities, and acts as a map to the 265 cited references. The article outlines (a) relevant characteristics of quantum mechanics, such as statistical balance and entanglement, (b) the thinking that led to the derivation of the original Bell inequality, and (c) the range of claimed implications, including realism, locality and others which attract less attention. The main conclusion is that violation of Bell inequalities appears to have some implications for the nature of physical reality, but that none of these are definite. The violations constrain possible prequantum (underlying) theories, but do not rule out the possibility that such theories might reconcile at least one understanding of locality and realism to quantum mechanical predictions. Violation might reflect, at least partly, failure to acknowledge the contextuality of quantum mechanics, or that data from different probability spaces have been inappropriately combined. Many claims that there are definite implications reflect one or more of (i) imprecise non-mathematical language, (ii) assumptions inappropriate in quantum mechanics, (iii) inadequate treatment of measurement statistics and (iv) underlying philosophical assumptions. Keywords: Bell inequalities; statistical balance; entanglement; realism; locality; prequantum theories; contextuality; probability space; conceptual; philosophical International Journal of Quantum Foundations 7 (2021) 48 1. Introduction and Overview (Area Mapped and Mapping Methods) Concepts are an important part of physics [1, § 2][2][3, § 1.2][4, § 1][5, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Nonlocality Explained
    Quantum Nonlocality Explained Ulrich Mohrhoff Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education Pondicherry 605002 India [email protected] Abstract Quantum theory's violation of remote outcome independence is as- sessed in the context of a novel interpretation of the theory, in which the unavoidable distinction between the classical and quantum domains is understood as a distinction between the manifested world and its manifestation. 1 Preliminaries There are at least nine formulations of quantum mechanics [1], among them Heisenberg's matrix formulation, Schr¨odinger'swave-function formu- lation, Feynman's path-integral formulation, Wigner's phase-space formula- tion, and the density-matrix formulation. The idiosyncracies of these forma- tions have much in common with the inertial reference frames of relativistic physics: anything that is not invariant under Lorentz transformations is a feature of whichever language we use to describe the physical world rather than an objective feature of the physical world. By the same token, any- thing that depends on the particular formulation of quantum mechanics is a feature of whichever mathematical tool we use to calculate the values of observables or the probabilities of measurement outcomes rather than an objective feature of the physical world. That said, when it comes to addressing specific questions, some formu- lations are obviously more suitable than others. As Styer et al. [1] wrote, The ever-popular wavefunction formulation is standard for prob- lem solving, but leaves the conceptual misimpression that [the] wavefunction is a physical entity rather than a mathematical tool. The path integral formulation is physically appealing and 1 generalizes readily beyond the domain of nonrelativistic quan- tum mechanics, but is laborious in most standard applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Bell Test Using Random Measurement Settings from High-Redshift Quasars
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 121, 080403 (2018) Editors' Suggestion Cosmic Bell Test Using Random Measurement Settings from High-Redshift Quasars Dominik Rauch,1,2,* Johannes Handsteiner,1,2 Armin Hochrainer,1,2 Jason Gallicchio,3 Andrew S. Friedman,4 Calvin Leung,1,2,3,5 Bo Liu,6 Lukas Bulla,1,2 Sebastian Ecker,1,2 Fabian Steinlechner,1,2 Rupert Ursin,1,2 Beili Hu,3 David Leon,4 Chris Benn,7 Adriano Ghedina,8 Massimo Cecconi,8 Alan H. Guth,5 † ‡ David I. Kaiser,5, Thomas Scheidl,1,2 and Anton Zeilinger1,2, 1Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, 1090 Vienna, Austria 2Vienna Center for Quantum Science & Technology (VCQ), Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria 3Department of Physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California 91711, USA 4Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA 5Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 6School of Computer, NUDT, 410073 Changsha, China 7Isaac Newton Group, Apartado 321, 38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain 8Fundación Galileo Galilei—INAF, 38712 Breña Baja, Spain (Received 5 April 2018; revised manuscript received 14 June 2018; published 20 August 2018) In this Letter, we present a cosmic Bell experiment with polarization-entangled photons, in which measurement settings were determined based on real-time measurements of the wavelength of photons from high-redshift quasars, whose light was emitted billions of years ago; the experiment simultaneously ensures locality. Assuming fair sampling for all detected photons and that the wavelength of the quasar photons had not been selectively altered or previewed between emission and detection, we observe statistically significant violation of Bell’s inequality by 9.3 standard deviations, corresponding to an estimated p value of ≲7.4 × 10−21.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Nonlocality As an Axiom
    Foundations of Physics, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1994 Quantum Nonlocality as an Axiom Sandu Popescu t and Daniel Rohrlich 2 Received July 2, 1993: revised July 19, 1993 In the conventional approach to quantum mechanics, &determinism is an axiom and nonlocality is a theorem. We consider inverting the logical order, mak#1g nonlocality an axiom and indeterminism a theorem. Nonlocal "superquantum" correlations, preserving relativistic causality, can violate the CHSH inequality more strongly than any quantum correlations. What is the quantum principle? J. Wheeler named it the "Merlin principle" after the legendary magician who, when pursued, could change his form again and again. The more we pursue the quantum principle, the more it changes: from discreteness, to indeterminism, to sums over paths, to many worlds, and so on. By comparison, the relativity principle is easy to grasp. Relativity theory and quantum theory underlie all of physics, but we do not always know how to reconcile them. Here, we take nonlocality as the quantum principle, and we ask what nonlocality and relativistic causality together imply. It is a pleasure to dedicate this paper to Professor Fritz Rohrlich, who has contributed much to the juncture of quantum theory and relativity theory, including its most spectacular success, quantum electrodynamics, and who has written both on quantum paradoxes tll and the logical structure of physical theory, t2~ Bell t31 proved that some predictions of quantum mechanics cannot be reproduced by any theory of local physical variables. Although Bell worked within nonrelativistic quantum theory, the definition of local variable is relativistic: a local variable can be influenced only by events in its back- ward light cone, not by events outside, and can influence events in its i Universit6 Libre de Bruxelles, Campus Plaine, C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Exist
    Quantum nonlocality does not exist Frank J. Tipler1 Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118 Edited* by John P. Perdew, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, and approved June 2, 2014 (received for review December 30, 2013) Quantum nonlocality is shown to be an artifact of the Copenhagen instantaneously the spin of particle 2 would be fixed in the op- interpretation, in which each observed quantity has exactly one posite direction to that of particle 1—if we assume that [2] col- value at any instant. In reality, all physical systems obey quantum lapses at the instant we measure the spin of particle 1. The mechanics, which obeys no such rule. Locality is restored if observed purported mystery of quantum nonlocality lies in trying to un- and observer are both assumed to obey quantum mechanics, as in derstand how particle 2 changes—instantaneously—in re- the many-worlds interpretation (MWI). Using the MWI, I show that sponse to what has happened in the location of particle 1. the quantum side of Bell’s inequality, generally believed nonlocal, There is no mystery. There is no quantum nonlocality. Particle is really due to a series of three measurements (not two as in the 2 does not know what has happened to particle 1 when its spin is standard, oversimplified analysis), all three of which have only measured. State transitions are entirely local in quantum me- local effects. Thus, experiments confirming “nonlocality” are actu- chanics. All these statements are true because quantum me- ally confirming the MWI. The mistaken interpretation of nonlocal- chanics tells us that the wave function does not collapse when ity experiments depends crucially on a question-begging version the state of a system is measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomical Random Numbers for Quantum Foundations Experiments
    Astronomical random numbers for quantum foundations experiments The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Leung, Calvin et al. "Astronomical random numbers for quantum foundations experiments." Physical Review A 97, 4 (April 2018): 042120 As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.042120 Publisher American Physical Society Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115234 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 PHYSICAL REVIEW A 97, 042120 (2018) Featured in Physics Astronomical random numbers for quantum foundations experiments Calvin Leung,1,* Amy Brown,1,† Hien Nguyen,2,‡ Andrew S. Friedman,3,§ David I. Kaiser,4,¶ and Jason Gallicchio1,** 1Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California 91711, USA 2NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California 91109, USA 3University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA 4Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA (Received 7 June 2017; published 24 April 2018) Photons from distant astronomical sources can be used as a classical source of randomness to improve fundamental tests of quantum nonlocality, wave-particle duality, and local realism through Bell’s inequality and delayed-choice quantum eraser tests inspired by Wheeler’s cosmic-scale Mach-Zehnder interferometer gedanken experiment. Such sources of random numbers may also be useful for information-theoretic applications such as key distribution for quantum cryptography. Building on the design of an astronomical random number generator developed for the recent cosmic Bell experiment [Handsteiner et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 060401 (2017)], in this paper we report on the design and characterization of a device that, with 20-nanosecond latency, outputs a bit based on whether the wavelength of an incoming photon is greater than or less than ≈700 nm.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlocality As an Axiom for Quantum Theory*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server NONLOCALITY AS AN AXIOM FOR QUANTUM THEORY* Daniel Rohrlich and Sandu Pop escu School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv 69978 Israel ABSTRACT Quantum mechanics and relativistic causality together imply nonlo cality: nonlo- cal correlations (that violate the CHSH inequality) and nonlo cal equations of motion (the Aharonov-Bohm e ect). Can weinvert the logical order? We consider a conjecture that nonlo cality and relativistic causality together imply quantum mechanics. We show that correlations preserving relativistic causality can violate the CHSH inequality more strongly than quantum correlations. Also, we describ e nonlo cal equations of motion, preserving rel- ativistic causality, that do not arise in quantum mechanics. In these nonlo cal equations of motion, an exp erimenter \jams" nonlo cal correlations b etween quantum systems. 1. INTRODUCTION Two asp ects of quantum nonlo cality are nonlo cal correlations and nonlo cal equations of motion. Nonlo cal correlations arise in settings such as the one discussed by Einstein, 1 2 Po dolsky and Rosen . As Bell showed (and Asp ect has reviewed in his lecture here) no 3 theory of lo cal variables can repro duce these correlations. The Aharonov-Bohm e ect is also nonlo cal in that an electromagnetic eld in uences an electron in a region where the eld vanishes. The eld induces a relative phase b etween two sets of paths available to an electron, displacing the interference pattern b etween the two sets of paths.
    [Show full text]
  • There Are No Particles, There Are Only Fields
    Downloaded 07 Mar 2013 to 130.184.202.223. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission There are no particles, there are only fields Art Hobsona) Department of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 (Received 18 April 2012; accepted 15 January 2013) Quantum foundations are still unsettled, with mixed effects on science and society. By now it should be possible to obtain consensus on at least one issue: Are the fundamental constituents fields or particles? As this paper shows, experiment and theory imply that unbounded fields, not bounded particles, are fundamental. This is especially clear for relativistic systems, implying that it’s also true of nonrelativistic systems. Particles are epiphenomena arising from fields. Thus, the Schr€odinger field is a space-filling physical field whose value at any spatial point is the probability amplitude for an interaction to occur at that point. The field for an electron is the electron; each electron extends over both slits in the two-slit experiment and spreads over the entire pattern; and quantum physics is about interactions of microscopic systems with the macroscopic world rather than just about measurements. It’s important to clarify this issue because textbooks still teach a particles- and measurement-oriented interpretation that contributes to bewilderment among students and pseudoscience among the public. This article reviews classical and quantum fields, the two-slit experiment, rigorous theorems showing particles are inconsistent with relativistic quantum theory, and several phenomena showing particles are incompatible with quantum field theories. VC 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Test of Quantum Nonlocality in Three-Photon
    letters to nature electrons could be employed to probe atoms and molecules ................................................................. remotely while minimizing the perturbing in¯uences of a nearby Experimental test of quantum local probeÐthese unwanted interactions might be chemical in nature or result from electric or magnetic ®elds emanating from an nonlocality in three-photon STM tip or other probe device. Our results also suggest altered geometries such as ellipsoids con®ning bulk electrons, or specially Greenberger±Horne±Zeilinger shaped electron mirrors (such as parabolic re¯ectors) electronically coupling two or more points. One might additionally envision entanglement performing other types of `spectroscopy-at-a-distance' beyond electronic structure measurements, for example, detecting Jian-Wei Pan*, Dik Bouwmeester², Matthew Daniell*, vibrational16 or magnetic excitations. Harald Weinfurter³ & Anton Zeilinger* We conclude with some remaining questions. Our calculations show that ellipses have a class of eigenmodes that possess strongly * Institut fuÈr Experimentalphysik, UniversitaÈt Wien, Boltzmanngasse 5, peaked probability amplitude near the classical foci (Fig. 3e and f are 1090 Wien, Austria good examples). Our experiments reveal that the strongest mirages ² Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK ³ Sektion Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitaÈtofMuÈnchen, occur when one of these eigenmodes is at EF and therefore at the energy of the Kondo resonance. When perturbed by a focal atom, Schellingstrasse 4/III, D-80799 MuÈnchen, Germany this eigenmode still has substantial density surrounding both foci; it .............................................................................................................................................. is therefore plausible that this quantum state `samples' the Kondo Bell's theorem1 states that certain statistical correlations predicted resonance on the real atom and transmits that signal to the other by quantum physics for measurements on two-particle systems focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading List on Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics David Wallace, June 2018
    Reading list on philosophy of quantum mechanics David Wallace, June 2018 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Introductory and general readings in philosophy of quantum theory ..................................................... 4 3. Physics and math resources ...................................................................................................................... 5 4. The quantum measurement problem....................................................................................................... 7 4. Non-locality in quantum theory ................................................................................................................ 8 5. State-eliminativist hidden variable theories (aka Psi-epistemic theories) ............................................. 10 6. The Copenhagen interpretation and its descendants ............................................................................ 12 7. Decoherence ........................................................................................................................................... 15 8. The Everett interpretation (aka the Many-Worlds Theory) .................................................................... 17 9. The de Broglie-Bohm theory ................................................................................................................... 22 10. Dynamical-collapse theories ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]