DOCSLIB.ORG

The Outer Planets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Outer Planets Science 3210 001 : Introduction to Astronomy Lecture 6 : The Outer Planets Robert Fisher Items ❑ Solution set 4 has been posted to the website. ❑ Reading/Homework set 5 has been posted to the website. ❑ Lunar eclipse tomorrow! ❑ Visible from moonrise (at about 5:50 PM) though about 7:15 PM. ❑ Look just north of due East to see the moon rise. ❑ Observational project. Today -- Outer Solar System ❑ Jupiter ❑ Saturn ❑ Uranus ❑ Neptune ❑ Pluto (Ok -- not a planet anymore, but a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt!) Comparison of Outer Planets ❑ A 3D computer rendering of the outer planets, compared with the inner planets, all to-scale : Jupiter ❑ Jupiter, the “king of the planets,” is the largest planet in the solar system. ❑ It has a mass 320 times that of the Earth. ❑ It has a radius 10 times that of the Earth, and is visibly oblate due to its strong rotation. ❑ Its enormous volume has allowed it to retain the heat left over from its formation even today -- it radiates away more energy than it takes in from the sun. Jupiter ❑ Jupiter’s cloud layers and red spot. Giant Red Spot Moons of Jupiter ❑ Jupiter has 63 known moons, including 4 major ones which are large enough to be spherical. ❑ The four major moons of Jupiter were discovered by Galileo in 1610 and are referred to as the Galilean moons. Io Europa 5,000 km Ganymede Callisto Io ❑ Jupiter’s moon Io is volcanically active, spewing sulfur plumes. Europa ❑ Detailed images of the surface of Europa taken with spacecraft reveal a highly-fractured icy surface, possibly with an underlying oceanic layer. Ganymede ❑ Ganymede, as photographed by Voyager and Galileo, reveals a complex surface activity similar to Europa. Jupiter’s Cloud Layer ❑ Like the Earth, the Coriolis effect due to Jupiter’s rotation divides the circulation patterns into a number of bands or cells. ❑ Unlike the Earth, the greater rotation of Jupiter leads to a larger number of bands. ❑ The colorations we see are caused when either uprising currents allow the top layer of ammonia to be visible (as white) or the lower-lying ammonium hydrosulfide layer to be visible (as reddish-brown). Jupiter’s Ring System ❑ Jupiter has a ring system like Saturn’s, although much less spectacular. Saturn ❑ Saturn is the second-largest planet in the solar system, and is the only planet in the solar system to have an average density less than that of liquid water. ❑ Mass 95 times that of the Earth. ❑ Radius about 4.5 times that of Earth, and is visibly oblate due to its strong rotation, similar to Jupiter. Artist’s Conception of Saturn’s RIngs Saturn’s Rings Imaged by Voyager Shepherd Moons ❑ Two small moons can “shepherd” ring material into a particularly sharp ring, as is the case with Saturn’s F ring : Saturn’s Moons ❑ Saturn has a rich system of satellites -- some 60 in total. ❑ Of these, seven are major satellites which are large enough to be spherical. Titan ❑ Several years ago, NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) sent the Cassini/Huygens mission to Saturn. The Huygens space probe entered the atmosphere of Saturn and took detailed measurements of its properties on its descent. Titan ❑ Titan is unique in the solar system -- it is a terrestrial-sized world with an atmosphere containing ethane and methane, both of which can be solid, liquid, and gaseous, just as water on Earth. Liquid Ethane Lakes? Uranus ❑ Uranus was the first planet to have been discovered, and not known from antiquity. ❑ It was discovered by accident by William Herschel ❑ It has roughly 14 times the mass of the Earth, with a radius about 4 times the radius of the Earth. Uranus as Photographed by Voyager 2 ❑ In January of 1986, shortly before the Challenger disaster, Voyager 2 flew by Uranus -- the first space mission to have ever visited it. ❑ The atmosphere of the planet consists of a methane haze and has virtually no distinguishable atmospheric features -- faint cloud patterns can only be brought out in “false color”. Moons of Uranus ❑ Uranus has at least twenty-seven known moons, including five major ones. ❑ The names of the moons are chosen not from classical mythology but rather Shakespeare. Miranda Arial Umbriel Titania Oberon 1500 km The Surprising Miranda Moon ❑ On its flyby, Voyager 2 approached the moon Miranda the closest. ❑ Given the distance from the Sun and the extremely cold temperatures (-335 degrees Fahrenheit), scientists expected a cold dead world. ❑ Instead, they were stunned to find a surprising world with a remarkably complex surface. Miranda as Imaged by Voyager 2 A Closeup of the Surface of Miranda Neptune ❑ Neptune is similar in more similar to Uranus than it is to either Jupiter and Saturn. ❑ Mass of 17 times the Earth. ❑ Radius of about 4 times that of Earth. The Story of the Discovery of Neptune ❑ If Uranus was the first planet to be discovered, Neptune was the first (and actually only) planet to be predicted. ❑ By the early 1840s, it became evident that the actual observed motion of Uranus deviated substantially from its predicted motion -- a so-called orbital anomaly. ❑ British scientist John Couch Adams first inferred a predicted location for the new planet in 1843. Adams sent the British Royal Astronomer Sir George Airy the prediction. The British observational effort, however, floundered. ❑ Independently, the French Scientist Urbain Leverrier predicted a similar location for a new planet in 1846. Using the prediction of Leverrier, the German astronomer Johann Gottfriend Galle was the first to actually observe Neptune, on September 23, 1846. Neptune ❑ The Voyager 2 encounter with Neptune on August 25, 1989 was its last major encounter with a planet before leaving the solar system. Dark Spot Moons of Neptune ❑ Neptune has 13 known moons, including the major moon Triton, which is unique among the major moons in the solar system for its retrograde motion. Triton as Imaged by Voyager 2 ❑ Like Miranda, Triton revealed a remarkably complex, geologically- active surface. “Canteloupe” Triton as a Kuiper Belt Object ? ❑ The unusual orbital and surface properties of Triton have led some astronomers to suggest that in fact it is a captured Kuiper Belt Object, like Pluto. ❑ The most common model suggests that Triton may have had its own satellite prior to the encounter, which was lost during the capture. Other “primordial moons” of Neptune would also have been lost in the process. T T Pluto / Kuiper Belt Objects ❑ Pluto (now recognized by the International Astronomical Union as a “dwarf planet” and a Kuiper Belt Object) was discovered by Clyde Tombaugh in 1931. The Saga of Planet X ❑ Neptune had been discovered by Adams and Leverrier by the careful analysis of unexplained anomalies in the orbit of Uranus. ❑ By about 1900, the orbit of Neptune began to exhibit apparent anomalies in its orbit, much like Uranus had nearly in the early part of the 19th century. ❑ Some astronomers believed that apparent anomalies in the orbit of Neptune could be explained by the existence of a ninth, yet- undiscovered planet -- Planet X. Percival Lowell (1855 - 1916) ❑ Percival Lowell was an astronomer, mathematician, and writer born to an elite Boston clan. He is perhaps one of the best and one of the last examples of a Renaissance scholar who funded his own research efforts and constructed his own observatory. And Planet X Inspired Bad Science Fiction… Clyde Tombaugh (1906 - 1997) ❑ Tombaugh was born on a farm in Streator, Illinois. His family later moved to Kansas, where he built his own telescope. ❑ After sending his astronomical drawings to the Lowell observatory in Arizona, he was offered a position as an observer -- with just a high school diploma! ❑ He discovered Pluto in 1930 while searching for the mysterious “Planet X” which had been predicted by Percival Lowell almost 30 years earlier. ❑ After discovering Pluto, he went on to attend college and graduate school! Clyde Tombaugh with Homemade Telescope -- c. 1930 Blink Comparator ❑ By careful comparison of two photographic plates of the same portion of the sky taken at different times, Tombaugh found Pluto -- initially thought to be the mysterious Planet X. Pluto Discovery Plates ❑ After inspection of the discovery plates in January, 1930, it became clear that Pluto had been seen on other plates taken by other more senior professional astronomers at Lowell, but missed. Pluto’s Orbit ❑ The orbit of Pluto is highly unusual in comparison to the other planets in the solar system -- it is both highly eccentric and inclined with respect to the plane of the ecliptic. Pluto Compared with the Earth ❑ Pluto is a tiny world, much smaller than any of the other planets in the Solar System. Pluto as Compared to Some Other Major Moons in Solar System ❑ Pluto is much smaller even than most major moons in the solar system -- its mass is equivalent to 0.2 times the mass of our our moon. Planet X ? ❑ Eventually it became clear that Pluto was far too small to account for the anomalies of the much-larger planet of Neptune. ❑ The Planet X hypothesis remained for decades to come -- though now it was hypothesized that Planet X was a tenth planet outside Pluto. ❑ It was only years later, in the 1990s, that astronomers finally understood that the “anomalies” in Neptune’s orbit were actually the direct consequence of a few early inaccurate measurements of Neptune’s orbit. Next Week -- New Planetary Systems, and the Formation of the Sun and the Planets ❑ Next week we will discuss the radical new detections of planets outside our solar system that has emerged in the last ten years -- revolutionizing our understanding of how planets form.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Wunda-Full World? Carbon Dioxide Ice Deposits on Umbriel and Other Uranian Moons
    Icarus 290 (2017) 1–13 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus A Wunda-full world? Carbon dioxide ice deposits on Umbriel and other Uranian moons ∗ Michael M. Sori , Jonathan Bapst, Ali M. Bramson, Shane Byrne, Margaret E. Landis Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Carbon dioxide has been detected on the trailing hemispheres of several Uranian satellites, but the exact Received 22 June 2016 nature and distribution of the molecules remain unknown. One such satellite, Umbriel, has a prominent Revised 28 January 2017 high albedo annulus-shaped feature within the 131-km-diameter impact crater Wunda. We hypothesize Accepted 28 February 2017 that this feature is a solid deposit of CO ice. We combine thermal and ballistic transport modeling to Available online 2 March 2017 2 study the evolution of CO 2 molecules on the surface of Umbriel, a high-obliquity ( ∼98 °) body. Consid- ering processes such as sublimation and Jeans escape, we find that CO 2 ice migrates to low latitudes on geologically short (100s–1000 s of years) timescales. Crater morphology and location create a local cold trap inside Wunda, and the slopes of crater walls and a central peak explain the deposit’s annular shape. The high albedo and thermal inertia of CO 2 ice relative to regolith allows deposits 15-m-thick or greater to be stable over the age of the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Exomoon Habitability Constrained by Illumination and Tidal Heating
    submitted to Astrobiology: April 6, 2012 accepted by Astrobiology: September 8, 2012 published in Astrobiology: January 24, 2013 this updated draft: October 30, 2013 doi:10.1089/ast.2012.0859 Exomoon habitability constrained by illumination and tidal heating René HellerI , Rory BarnesII,III I Leibniz-Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany, [email protected] II Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 951580, Seattle, WA 98195, [email protected] III NASA Astrobiology Institute – Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA Abstract The detection of moons orbiting extrasolar planets (“exomoons”) has now become feasible. Once they are discovered in the circumstellar habitable zone, questions about their habitability will emerge. Exomoons are likely to be tidally locked to their planet and hence experience days much shorter than their orbital period around the star and have seasons, all of which works in favor of habitability. These satellites can receive more illumination per area than their host planets, as the planet reflects stellar light and emits thermal photons. On the contrary, eclipses can significantly alter local climates on exomoons by reducing stellar illumination. In addition to radiative heating, tidal heating can be very large on exomoons, possibly even large enough for sterilization. We identify combinations of physical and orbital parameters for which radiative and tidal heating are strong enough to trigger a runaway greenhouse. By analogy with the circumstellar habitable zone, these constraints define a circumplanetary “habitable edge”. We apply our model to hypothetical moons around the recently discovered exoplanet Kepler-22b and the giant planet candidate KOI211.01 and describe, for the first time, the orbits of habitable exomoons.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Nomenclature: an Overview and Update
    3rd Planetary Data Workshop 2017 (LPI Contrib. No. 1986) 7119.pdf PLANETARY NOMENCLATURE: AN OVERVIEW AND UPDATE. T. Gaither1, R. K. Hayward1, J. Blue1, L. Gaddis1, R. Schulz2, K. Aksnes3, G. Burba4, G. Consolmagno5, R. M. C. Lopes6, P. Masson7, W. Sheehan8, B.A. Smith9, G. Williams10, C. Wood11, 1USGS Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Ar- izona ([email protected]); 2ESA Scientific Support Office, Noordwijk, The Netherlands; 3Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, Oslo, Norway; 4Vernadsky Institute, Moscow, Russia; 5Specola Vaticana, Vati- can City State; 6Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; 7Uni- versite de Paris-Sud, Orsay, France; 8Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona; 9Santa Fe, New Mexico; 10Minor Planet Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 11Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona. Introduction: The task of naming planetary Asteroids surface features, rings, and natural satellites is Ceres 113 managed by the International Astronomical Un- Dactyl 2 ion’s (IAU) Working Group for Planetary System Eros 41 Nomenclature (WGPSN). The members of the Gaspra 34 WGPSN and its task groups have worked since the Ida 25 early 1970s to provide a clear, unambiguous sys- Itokawa 17 tem of planetary nomenclature that represents cul- Lutetia 37 tures and countries from all regions of Earth. Mathilde 23 WGPSN members include Rita Schulz (chair) and Steins 24 9 other members representing countries around the Vesta 106 globe (see author list). In 2013, Blue et al. [1] pre- Jupiter sented an overview of planetary nomenclature, and Amalthea 4 in 2016 Hayward et al. [2] provided an update to Thebe 1 this overview. Given the extensive planetary ex- Io 224 ploration and research that has taken place since Europa 111 2013, it is time to update the community on the sta- Ganymede 195 tus of planetary nomenclature, the purpose and Callisto 153 rules, the process for submitting name requests, and the IAU approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Habitability of Extrasolar Moons
    Formation, Detection, and Characterization of Extrasolar Habitable Planets Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 293, 2012 c International Astronomical Union 2014 N. Haghighipour, ed. doi:10.1017/S1743921313012738 Constraints on the Habitability of Extrasolar Moons Ren´e Heller1 and Rory Barnes2,3 1 Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam email: [email protected] 2 University of Washington, Dept. of Astronomy, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 3 Virtual Planetary Laboratory, NASA, USA email: [email protected] Abstract. Detections of massive extrasolar moons are shown feasible with the Kepler space telescope. Kepler’s findings of about 50 exoplanets in the stellar habitable zone naturally make us wonder about the habitability of their hypothetical moons. Illumination from the planet, eclipses, tidal heating, and tidal locking distinguish remote characterization of exomoons from that of exoplanets. We show how evaluation of an exomoon’s habitability is possible based on the parameters accessible by current and near-future technology. Keywords. celestial mechanics – planets and satellites: general – astrobiology – eclipses 1. Introduction The possible discovery of inhabited exoplanets has motivated considerable efforts towards estimating planetary habitability. Effects of stellar radiation (Kasting et al. 1993; Selsis et al. 2007), planetary spin (Williams & Kasting 1997; Spiegel et al. 2009), tidal evolution (Jackson et al. 2008; Barnes et al. 2009; Heller et al. 2011), and composition (Raymond et al. 2006; Bond et al. 2010) have been studied. Meanwhile, Kepler’s high precision has opened the possibility of detecting extrasolar moons (Kipping et al. 2009; Tusnski & Valio 2011) and the first dedicated searches for moons in the Kepler data are underway (Kipping et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Occultation Newsletter Volume 8, Number 4
    Volume 12, Number 1 January 2005 $5.00 North Am./$6.25 Other International Occultation Timing Association, Inc. (IOTA) In this Issue Article Page The Largest Members Of Our Solar System – 2005 . 4 Resources Page What to Send to Whom . 3 Membership and Subscription Information . 3 IOTA Publications. 3 The Offices and Officers of IOTA . .11 IOTA European Section (IOTA/ES) . .11 IOTA on the World Wide Web. Back Cover ON THE COVER: Steve Preston posted a prediction for the occultation of a 10.8-magnitude star in Orion, about 3° from Betelgeuse, by the asteroid (238) Hypatia, which had an expected diameter of 148 km. The predicted path passed over the San Francisco Bay area, and that turned out to be quite accurate, with only a small shift towards the north, enough to leave Richard Nolthenius, observing visually from the coast northwest of Santa Cruz, to have a miss. But farther north, three other observers video recorded the occultation from their homes, and they were fortuitously located to define three well- spaced chords across the asteroid to accurately measure its shape and location relative to the star, as shown in the figure. The dashed lines show the axes of the fitted ellipse, produced by Dave Herald’s WinOccult program. This demonstrates the good results that can be obtained by a few dedicated observers with a relatively faint star; a bright star and/or many observers are not always necessary to obtain solid useful observations. – David Dunham Publication Date for this issue: July 2005 Please note: The date shown on the cover is for subscription purposes only and does not reflect the actual publication date.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12 the Rings and Moons of the Outer Planets October 15, 2018
    Lecture 12 The Rings and Moons of the Outer Planets October 15, 2018 1 2 Rings of Outer Planets • Rings are not solid but are fragments of material – Saturn: Ice and ice-coated rock (bright) – Others: Dusty ice, rocky material (dark) • Very thin – Saturn rings ~0.05 km thick! • Rings can have many gaps due to small satellites – Saturn and Uranus 3 Rings of Jupiter •Very thin and made of small, dark particles. 4 Rings of Saturn Flash movie 5 Saturn’s Rings Ring structure in natural color, photographed by Cassini probe July 23, 2004. Click on image for Astronomy Picture of the Day site, or here for JPL information 6 Saturn’s Rings (false color) Photo taken by Voyager 2 on August 17, 1981. Click on image for more information 7 Saturn’s Ring System (Cassini) Mars Mimas Janus Venus Prometheus A B C D F G E Pandora Enceladus Epimetheus Earth Tethys Moon Wikipedia image with annotations On July 19, 2013, in an event celebrated the world over, NASA's Cassini spacecraft slipped into Saturn's shadow and turned to image the planet, seven of its moons, its inner rings -- and, in the background, our home planet, Earth. 8 Newly Discovered Saturnian Ring • Nearly invisible ring in the plane of the moon Pheobe’s orbit, tilted 27° from Saturn’s equatorial plane • Discovered by the infrared Spitzer Space Telescope and announced 6 October 2009 • Extends from 128 to 207 Saturnian radii and is about 40 radii thick • Contributes to the two-tone coloring of the moon Iapetus • Click here for more info about the artist’s rendering 9 Rings of Uranus • Uranus -- rings discovered through stellar occultation – Rings block light from star as Uranus moves by.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the 50Th DDA Meeting (Boulder, CO)
    Abstracts of the 50th DDA Meeting (Boulder, CO) American Astronomical Society June, 2019 100 — Dynamics on Asteroids break-up event around a Lagrange point. 100.01 — Simulations of a Synthetic Eurybates 100.02 — High-Fidelity Testing of Binary Asteroid Collisional Family Formation with Applications to 1999 KW4 Timothy Holt1; David Nesvorny2; Jonathan Horner1; Alex B. Davis1; Daniel Scheeres1 Rachel King1; Brad Carter1; Leigh Brookshaw1 1 Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder 1 Centre for Astrophysics, University of Southern Queensland (Boulder, Colorado, United States) (Longmont, Colorado, United States) 2 Southwest Research Institute (Boulder, Connecticut, United The commonly accepted formation process for asym- States) metric binary asteroids is the spin up and eventual fission of rubble pile asteroids as proposed by Walsh, Of the six recognized collisional families in the Jo- Richardson and Michel (Walsh et al., Nature 2008) vian Trojan swarms, the Eurybates family is the and Scheeres (Scheeres, Icarus 2007). In this theory largest, with over 200 recognized members. Located a rubble pile asteroid is spun up by YORP until it around the Jovian L4 Lagrange point, librations of reaches a critical spin rate and experiences a mass the members make this family an interesting study shedding event forming a close, low-eccentricity in orbital dynamics. The Jovian Trojans are thought satellite. Further work by Jacobson and Scheeres to have been captured during an early period of in- used a planar, two-ellipsoid model to analyze the stability in the Solar system. The parent body of the evolutionary pathways of such a formation event family, 3548 Eurybates is one of the targets for the from the moment the bodies initially fission (Jacob- LUCY spacecraft, and our work will provide a dy- son and Scheeres, Icarus 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Ice& Stone 2020
    Ice & Stone 2020 WEEK 33: AUGUST 9-15 Presented by The Earthrise Institute # 33 Authored by Alan Hale About Ice And Stone 2020 It is my pleasure to welcome all educators, students, topics include: main-belt asteroids, near-Earth asteroids, and anybody else who might be interested, to Ice and “Great Comets,” spacecraft visits (both past and Stone 2020. This is an educational package I have put future), meteorites, and “small bodies” in popular together to cover the so-called “small bodies” of the literature and music. solar system, which in general means asteroids and comets, although this also includes the small moons of Throughout 2020 there will be various comets that are the various planets as well as meteors, meteorites, and visible in our skies and various asteroids passing by Earth interplanetary dust. Although these objects may be -- some of which are already known, some of which “small” compared to the planets of our solar system, will be discovered “in the act” -- and there will also be they are nevertheless of high interest and importance various asteroids of the main asteroid belt that are visible for several reasons, including: as well as “occultations” of stars by various asteroids visible from certain locations on Earth’s surface. Ice a) they are believed to be the “leftovers” from the and Stone 2020 will make note of these occasions and formation of the solar system, so studying them provides appearances as they take place. The “Comet Resource valuable insights into our origins, including Earth and of Center” at the Earthrise web site contains information life on Earth, including ourselves; about the brighter comets that are visible in the sky at any given time and, for those who are interested, I will b) we have learned that this process isn’t over yet, and also occasionally share information about the goings-on that there are still objects out there that can impact in my life as I observe these comets.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Finds Neptune Moons Locked in 'Dance of Avoidance' 15 November 2019, by Gretchen Mccartney
    NASA finds Neptune moons locked in 'dance of avoidance' 15 November 2019, by Gretchen McCartney Although the dance may appear odd, it keeps the orbits stable, researchers said. "We refer to this repeating pattern as a resonance," said Marina Brozovi?, an expert in solar system dynamics at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, and the lead author of the new paper, which was published Nov. 13 in Icarus. "There are many different types of 'dances' that planets, moons and asteroids can follow, but this one has never been seen before." Far from the pull of the Sun, the giant planets of the Neptune Moon Dance: This animation illustrates how the outer solar system are the dominant sources of odd orbits of Neptune's inner moons Naiad and gravity, and collectively, they boast dozens upon Thalassa enable them to avoid each other as they race dozens of moons. Some of those moons formed around the planet. Credit: NASA alongside their planets and never went anywhere; others were captured later, then locked into orbits dictated by their planets. Some orbit in the opposite direction their planets rotate; others swap orbits Even by the wild standards of the outer solar with each other as if to avoid collision. system, the strange orbits that carry Neptune's two innermost moons are unprecedented, according to Neptune has 14 confirmed moons. Neso, the newly published research. farthest-flung of them, orbits in a wildly elliptical loop that carries it nearly 46 million miles (74 million Orbital dynamics experts are calling it a "dance of kilometers) away from the planet and takes 27 avoidance" performed by the tiny moons Naiad years to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Contributions to the Quantitative Characterization of Biomass Burning for Climate Modeling
    Revised Version of Review Article for Atmospheric Research Satellite Contributions to the Quantitative Characterization of Biomass Burning for Climate Modeling Charles Ichoku, Ralph Kahn, Mian Chin Lab. for Atmospheres, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA Corresponding Author: Dr. Charles Ichoku Climate & Radiation Branch, Code 613.2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA Phone : +1-301-614-6212 Fax : +1-301-614-6307 or +1-301-614-6420 Email : [email protected] Abstract Characterization of biomass burning from space has been the subject of an extensive body of literature published over the last few decades. Given the importance of this topic, we review how satellite observations contribute toward improving the representation of biomass burning quantitatively in climate and air-quality modeling and assessment. Satellite observations related to biomass burning may be classified into five broad categories: (i) active fire location and energy release, (ii) burned areas and burn severity, (iii) smoke plume physical disposition, (iv) aerosol distribution and particle properties, and (v) trace gas concentrations. Each of these categories involves multiple parameters used in characterizing specific aspects of the biomass-burning phenomenon. Some of the parameters are merely qualitative, whereas others are quantitative, although all are essential for improving the scientific understanding of the overall distribution (both spatial and temporal) and impacts of biomass burning. Some of the qualitative satellite datasets, such as fire locations, aerosol index, and gas estimates have fairly long-term records. They date back as far as the 1970s, following the launches of the DMSP, Landsat, NOAA, and Nimbus series of earth observation satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Resonant Moons of Neptune
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-901-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Resonant moons of Neptune Marina Brozović (1), Mark R. Showalter (2), Robert A. Jacobson (1), Robert S. French (2), Jack L. Lissauer (3), Imke de Pater (4) (1) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, California, USA, (2) SETI Institute, California, USA, (3) NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA, (4) University of California Berkeley, California, USA Abstract We used integrated orbits to fit astrometric data of the 2. Methods regular moons of Neptune. We found a 73:69 inclination resonance between Naiad and Thalassa, the 2.1 Observations two innermost moons. Their resonant argument librates around 180° with an average amplitude of The astrometric data cover the period from 1981-2016, ~66° and a period of ~1.9 years. This is the first fourth- with the most significant amount of data originating order resonance discovered between the moons of the from the Voyager 2 spacecraft and HST. Voyager 2 outer planets. The resonance enabled an estimate of imaged all regular satellites except Hippocamp the GMs for Naiad and Thalassa, GMN= between 1989 June 7 and 1989 August 24. The follow- 3 -2 3 0.0080±0.0043 km s and GMT=0.0236±0.0064 km up observations originated from several Earth-based s-2. More high-precision astrometry of Naiad and telescopes, but the majority were still obtained by HST. Thalassa will help better constrain their masses. The [4] published the latest set of the HST astrometry GMs of Despina, Galatea, and Larissa are more including the discovery and follow up observations of difficult to measure because they are not in any direct Hippocamp.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Definition
    Marin Erceg dipl.oec. CEO ORCA TEHNOLOGIJE http://www.orca-technologies.com Zagreb, 2006. Editor : mr.sc. Tino Jelavi ć dipl.ing. aeronautike-pilot Text review : dr.sc. Zlatko Renduli ć dipl.ing. mr.sc. Tino Jelavi ć dipl.ing. aeronautike-pilot Danijel Vukovi ć dipl.ing. zrakoplovstva Translation review : Dana Vukovi ć, prof. engl. i hrv. jez. i knjiž. Graphic and html design : mr.sc. Tino Jelavi ć dipl.ing. Publisher : JET MANGA Ltd. for space transport and services http://www.yuairwar.com/erceg.asp ISBN : 953-99838-5-1 2 Contents Introduction Defining the problem Size factor Eccentricity issue Planemos and fusors Clear explanation of our Solar system Planet definition Free floating planets Conclusion References Curriculum Vitae 3 Introduction For several thousand years humans were aware of planets. While sitting by the fire, humans were observing the sky and the stars even since prehistory. They noticed that several sparks out of thousands of stars were oddly behaving, moving around the sky across irregular paths. They were named planets. Definition of the planet at that time was simple and it could have been expressed by following sentence: Sparkling dot in the sky whose relative position to the other stars is continuously changing following unpredictable paths. During millenniums and especially upon telescope discovery, human understanding of celestial bodies became deeper and deeper. This also meant that people understood better the space and our Solar system and in this period we have accepted the following definition of the planet: Round objects orbiting Sun. Following Ceres and Asteroid Belt discoveries this definition was not suitable any longer, and as a result it was modified.
    [Show full text]