DOCSLIB.ORG

6 Destruction of Libraries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

6Destruction of Libraries In the last chapter we have seen that some Christian groups,such as monks and ascetics,wereopposed not onlytospecific aspectsofpagan literature such as magic, astrology,heresy and the philosophical discourses that informed it,but also to pagan literatureasawhole. Thisdoes not mean that therewas aconcert- ed effort to destroy these books, but thereare reasons to think thatincases of violent religious conflicts books could also be the object of destruction, given the power that some attributed to books. The fourth and fifth century are gener- allycharacterised by anumberofreligious conflicts having to do with the eccle- siastical and social controversies at that time. Ecclesiastical dissent and Christi- an−pagan tensions often gave rise to factionalism, riots and street-fighting in the major cities of the RomanEmpire. In this context,ithas been assumedthat Christians in Late Antiquityde- stroyed large libraries.¹ But the sourceevidence for this assumption must be questioned. These incidents are often best viewed as isolated reactions set within abroader context of religious violence thatfrequentlybrokeout in Late Antiqui- ty.Ishallthereforenow scrutinisethe incidents of books burnt incidentallydur- ing raidsand riots, arguing thatinmanycases religion was an important factor that instigated mob violence. While Ihavesofar discussed incidents of book- burning thatusually had to do with imperial legislation, this chapter will deal with instances in which anydestruction of books was probablyunintentional, but perhapsopenly tolerated as the necessary outcome of abuildingbeing de- stroyed. Ishall first discuss the case of alibrary foundedbythe emperor Julian in Antioch and destroyed by his successor Jovian. While this incident at first glance appears to be aclear caseofdeliberate destruction on religious grounds,upon closer studyitisclear that the sourceevidence is ambiguous. Ishall then discuss the destruction of alarge library in Rome, arguing that this too mayhavebeen the resultofareligious riot,although the evidence is unclear.Ishall go on to analyse the sourceevidence for the end of Alexandria’stwo main libraries. My aim is to support the view put forward in previous scholarshipthatthe library in the Museion maywellhavecontinued to exist until the religious riot in 391, duringwhich the Serapeum was reportedlydestroyed. In this context,itis also interesting to read the evidence on the philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria as acasestudyfor allegations lodgedagainst subversive booksatthat time. I shall then analyse the scant evidence for the destruction of libraries or archives Prinz (), . DOI 10.1515/9783110486070-008, © 2020 Dirk Rohmann, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. 6.1 ATemple Destroyed in Antioch 239 duringthe sack of Rome in 410, arguing that Prudentius mayhavehad knowl- edge of this and that he justified the destruction as welcome from aChristian apologetic standpoint,asOrosiusdid as well. Finally, Ishall discuss the evi- dence for the repeated destruction of the library in Constantinople. 6.1 ATemple DestroyedinAntioch Julian’splan to revive paganism as the central religion of the Roman Empire in- evitablyled to irritation. Christians and pagans alike felt that the emperorhad stretched it too far.His immediate successorswerethereforekeen to present themselvesasvery distant from Julian’sreligious policy after his untimelyand ominous death in battle in 363. All of the emperors after him werequick to pres- ent themselvesasChristian rulers. Because Julian was supportiveof, and himself advised by,prominent pagan philosophers, his short rule had evoked the mem- ories of the persecutions of the past.The immediate policy following Julian’s death was to reverse this kind of protectionism of pagan philosophy. Statues of Julian wereoverthrown, his name erased from inscriptions. It is therefore perhaps not unsurprising that one library was allegedlyde- stroyed by aChristian emperorduringthe shortrule of the emperorJovian, suc- cessor to the lastpagan emperor Julian. However,this casehas manyproblem- atic elements. It is onlyrecorded in late, unreliable and hostileaccounts, especiallybyJohn of Antioch, amonk of the sixth or earlyseventh century.Frag- ments of his work onlysurvive in later collections (from the tenth century in this case). Thetext from Mariev’srecent edition is agood place to start unpicking these:² They [the inhabitants of Antioch] directedtheir mockery at his wife as well, because of the destruction of atemple. Forthe emperor Hadrian had established asmall eleganttemple for the deification and honour of his father Trajan, which Julian the Apostatemade into alibrary.Itwas this temple that Jovian burned down alongwith all its books. The destruction of the temple-library would have resulted in ariot had not Jovian left the city.Itwas probablythe pagan population that forced Jovian to leave.The following parallel text,preserved by Suidas, mentionsthat Jovian was influ- Jo.Ant. fr. (Mariev, ): καθαπτόμενοι καὶ τῆςγυναικὸςαὐτοῦ διὰ τὴντοῦἱεροῦ κατα- στροφήν. ᾿Aδριανὸςμὲνγὰρὁβασιλεὺςεἰςἀποθέωσιν καὶ τιμὴντοῦπατρὸςΤραϊανοῦἔκτισε μικ- ρόντινα καὶ χαριέστατον ναόν, ὃν Ἰουλιανὸς ὁ παραβάτης βιβλιοθήκην κατεσκεύασεν· ὅνσὺν τοῖςβιβλίοις Ἰοβιανὸςκατέκαυσεν. 240 6Destruction of Libraries enced by his wife and givesaninteresting addition to the reaction of the Antio- chians. It probablycontains afragment from Eunapius,acontemporary pagan philosopher:³ And Jovian, incitedbyhis wife, burned down an elegant temple, erectedbytheemperor Hadrian for the deification of his father Trajan and turned intoalibrary by Julian for the eunuch Theophilus.Heburnt it down alongwith all the books it had, and the concubines themselveslaid the fire, under laughter.The Antiochians weredispleased with the emperor and threwout some of the books on the ground so that whoever wanted could pick them up and read them, but they attached other books to the walls. We have seen thatChristian polemicists often use terms of deriding and laughter to deprecateancient, pre-Christian, or competing literatures.This could mean that accordingtothis account in Suidas the destruction of bookswas not only incidental to the destruction of the temple but that Jovian’sconcubines deliber- atelydestroyed books. Yetthe historicity of the text is not without doubt. If the original text was written by Eunapius,then this accounts for acertain amountofhostility against Jovian. Zonaras, writinginthe twelfth century but using earlier sources reports that Jovian returned the exiledChristian priests to Antioch when staying there but alsodecorated Julian’smemorial in Tarsus, suggesting that he was not al- ways hostile towards Julian. We know that Jovian’swife was not present at his death soon after;⁴ but it is unclear whether or not she waswith him in Antioch, as John of Antioch claims. Neither Zonaras or Philostorgius, or the contemporary Ammianus Marcellinus mention the destruction of the library when reporting Jo- vian’sstayinAntioch.⁵ John’saccount is detailed, but the whole fragment is very hostile, and it is thereforenot clear that the burningwas directlyordered by Jo- vian. Speyer put forward the idea that it “certainlywas hatred of his predecessor”⁶ (in reaction to Julian’steacher edict)that caused Jovian to act in this wayand there is evidence thatduringhis short time in charge Jovian indeed Suid. s.v. Ἰοβιανός, Adler =Eun. fr. Blockley: ὁ δὲἸοβιανός, ἐκτῆςγυναικὸςαὐτοῦ κινηθεὶςτὸνὑπὸ᾿Aδριανοῦ τοῦ βασιλέως κτισθέντα ναὸνχαριέστατον ἐς ἀποθέωσιν τοῦ πατρὸς Τραϊανοῦ, παρὰ δὲ τοῦἸουλιανοῦ κατασταθέντα βιβλιοθήκην εὐνούχῳ τινὶ Θεοφίλῳ, κατέφλεξε σὺνπᾶσιν οἷςεἶχε βιβλίοις, αὐτῶντῶνπαλλακίδων ὑφαπτουσῶνμετὰ γέλωτος τὴνπυράν. οἱ δὲ ᾿Aντιοχεῖς ἠγανάκτησαν κατὰ τοῦ βασιλέως καὶ τὰ μὲν ἀπέρριπτον τῶνβιβλίων ἐςτὸἔδαφος, ὥστε ἀναίρεσθαι τὸνβουλόμενον καὶἀναγινώσκειν, τὰ δὲ τοῖςτοίχοις προσεκόλλιζον. Zonar. epit. hist. .. Philost. h.e. .;Amm. .. felt instead urgedtopass over pagan philosophy. Speyer (), –. 6.2 The Palatine LibraryinRome 241 took actionsagainst pagan philosophers.⁷ Whether or not he actuallydestroyed the library is less clear. Julian’slibrary in Antioch was also atemple dedicated to Trajan by Hadrian, Trajan’sadoptive son. It is well known thatalsoother ancient libraries werelo- cated in temples,such as in the case of the Museion, an ancient research insti- tute, which mayhavehousedthe great library of Alexandria and was atemple to the Muses. Books werealso stored in baths and in gymnasia.⁸ As with temples, these institutions, seen as housing demons, wereoftendemolished or aban- doned as aconsequenceofChristianisation in Late Antiquity unless they were turned into Christian buildings.⁹ In this context,several laws at different times in the Codex Theodosianus ruled against the temples.¹⁰ While there are laws to preservestatues and orna- ments because of their value (they could be reused as images of saints),¹¹ other laws later ordered the destruction of sacreditems.¹² Constantine’sson and successor in the West,Constans (337–350), in 346 ruled that “all supersti- tion must be completelyeradicated” in the city of Rome.¹³ The Codex Theodosia- nus is silent on the question of what to do with booksfound in temples.Howev- er,alaw issuedbyArcadius and Honorius in 399,related to Africa, ordered that constructions of temples stillstanding have to be “emptyofillegal things.”¹⁴ The lawexplicitlymentions sacrifices and idols, although it is possiblethat “illegal things”
Recommended publications
  • King Lfred's Version Off the Consolations of Boethius

    King Lfred's Version Off the Consolations of Boethius

    King _lfred's Version off the Consolations of Boethius HENRY FROWDE, M A. PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY OF OF_0RD LONDON, EDINBURGH_ AND NEW YORK Kring e__lfred's Version o_/"the Consolations of Boethius _ _ Z)one into c_gfodern English, with an Introduction _ _ _ _ u_aa Litt.D._ Editor _o_.,I_ing .... i .dlfred_ OM Englis.h..ffgerAon2.' !ilo of the ' De Con.d.¢_onz,o,e 2 Oxford : _4t the Claro_don:,.....: PrestO0000 M D CCCC _eee_ Ioee_ J_el eeoee le e_ZNeFED AT THE_.e_EN_N PI_.._S _ee • • oeoo eee • oeee eo6_o eoee • ooeo e_ooo ..:.. ..'.: oe°_ ° leeeo eeoe ee •QQ . :.:.. oOeeo QOO_e 6eeQ aee...._ e • eee TO THE REV. PROFESSOR W. W. SKEAT LITT.D._ D.C.L._ LL.D.:_ PH.D. THIS _800K IS GRATEFULLY DEDICATED PREFACE THE preparationsfor adequately commemoratingthe forthcoming millenary of King Alfred's death have set going a fresh wave of popularinterest in that hero. Lectares have been given, committees formed, sub- scriptions paid and promised, and an excellent book of essays by eminent specialists has been written about Alfred considered under quite a number of aspects. That great King has himself told us that he was not indifferent to the opinion of those that should come after him, and he earnestly desired that that opinion should be a high one. We have by no means for- gotten him, it is true, but yet to verymany intelligent people he is, to use a paradox, a distinctly nebulous character of history. His most undying attributes in the memory of the people are not unconnected with singed cakes and romantic visits in disguise to the Danish viii Preface Danish camp.
  • Orosius' Histories: a Digital Intertextual Investigation Into The

    Orosius' Histories: a Digital Intertextual Investigation Into The

    comprehensive and detailed manual exploration of all of Orosius’ references. Orosius’ Histories: A Digital “It would be burdensome to list all of the Vergilian Intertextual Investigation echoes [...]” (Coffin, 1936: 237) What Coffin describes as “burdensome” can be into the First Christian accomplished with machine assistance. To the best of History of Rome our knowledge, no existing study, traditional or computational, has quantified and analysed the reuse Greta Franzini habits of Orosius. [email protected] The Tesserae project, which specialises in allusion Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany detection, is the most similar to the research presented here (Coffee, 2013), with the difference that it does not yet contain the text of Orosius nor many of Marco Büchler its sources, and that the results are automatically [email protected] computed without user input. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany In contrast, our approach, TRACER (Büchler et al., 2017), offers complete control over the algorithmic process, giving the user the choice between being Introduction guided by the software and to intervene by adjusting The research described in these pages is made pos- search parameters. In this way, results are produced sible by openly available Classical texts and linguistic through a critical evaluation of the detection. resources. It aims at performing semi-automatic anal- Research Questions and Goal yses of Paulus Orosius’ (385-420 AD) most celebrated work, the Historia adversum Paganos Libri VII, against Our research began with the following questions: its sources. The Histories, as this work is known in Eng- how does Orosius adapt Classical authors? Can we lish, constitute the first history (752 BC to 417 AD) to categorise his text reuse styles and what is the optimal have been written from a Christian perspective.
  • Palladas and the Age of Constantine Author(S): KEVIN W

    Palladas and the Age of Constantine Author(S): KEVIN W

    Palladas and the Age of Constantine Author(s): KEVIN W. WILKINSON Source: The Journal of Roman Studies , 2009, Vol. 99 (2009), pp. 36-60 Published by: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies constantinethegreatcoins.com Palladas and the Age of Constantine* KEVIN W. WILKINSON The poet and grammarian Palladas of Alexandria, author of more than 150 epigrams in the Greek Anthology, has remained a somewhat elusive figure. Though no epigrammatist is better represented in our two major sources for the Anthology, scarcely a trace of his exist- ence survives outside of his corpus of poems. His identity was so shadowy in the Byzantine period that he did not even warrant a mention in the Suda. By the tenth century, therefore, and presumably long before that time, 'Palladas' was merely the name of a man who had written some decent epigrams. Several clues remain, however, that allow us to locate him in a particular historical context. The history of scholarship on this problem is long and complex, but two rough timelines for his life have been proposed. The traditional estimate of his dates was c. A.D. 360-450. This was revised in the middle of the twentieth century to c. A.D. 319-400. It is my contention that the first of these is about a century too late and the second approximately sixty years too late. Such challenges to long-held opinion do not always enjoy a happy fate. Nevertheless, there are those cases in which the weight of scholarly tradition rests on surprisingly shaky foundations and in which a careful review of the evidence can result in significant improvements.1 The following argument proceeds in six stages: summary of the foundations for the traditional dates (1) and the current consensus (11); discussion of two external clues (in); challenge to the prevailing views (iv); construction of a new timeline (v); conclusions (vi).
  • Teachers' Pay in Ancient Greece

    Teachers' Pay in Ancient Greece

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) University Studies of the University of Nebraska 5-1942 Teachers' Pay In Ancient Greece Clarence A. Forbes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/univstudiespapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Studies of the University of Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Teachers' Pay In Ancient Greece * * * * * CLARENCE A. FORBES UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA STUDIES Ma y 1942 STUDIES IN THE HUMANITIES NO.2 Note to Cataloger UNDER a new plan the volume number as well as the copy number of the University of Nebraska Studies was discontinued and only the numbering of the subseries carried on, distinguished by the month and the year of pu blica tion. Thus the present paper continues the subseries "Studies in the Humanities" begun with "University of Nebraska Studies, Volume 41, Number 2, August 1941." The other subseries of the University of Nebraska Studies, "Studies in Science and Technology," and "Studies in Social Science," are continued according to the above plan. Publications in all three subseries will be supplied to recipients of the "University Studies" series. Corre­ spondence and orders should be addressed to the Uni­ versity Editor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. University of Nebraska Studies May 1942 TEACHERS' PAY IN ANCIENT GREECE * * * CLARENCE A.
  • 15 Famous Greek Mathematicians and Their Contributions 1. Euclid

    15 Famous Greek Mathematicians and Their Contributions 1. Euclid

    15 Famous Greek Mathematicians and Their Contributions 1. Euclid He was also known as Euclid of Alexandria and referred as the father of geometry deduced the Euclidean geometry. The name has it all, which in Greek means “renowned, glorious”. He worked his entire life in the field of mathematics and made revolutionary contributions to geometry. 2. Pythagoras The famous ‘Pythagoras theorem’, yes the same one we have struggled through in our childhood during our challenging math classes. This genius achieved in his contributions in mathematics and become the father of the theorem of Pythagoras. Born is Samos, Greece and fled off to Egypt and maybe India. This great mathematician is most prominently known for, what else but, for his Pythagoras theorem. 3. Archimedes Archimedes is yet another great talent from the land of the Greek. He thrived for gaining knowledge in mathematical education and made various contributions. He is best known for antiquity and the invention of compound pulleys and screw pump. 4. Thales of Miletus He was the first individual to whom a mathematical discovery was attributed. He’s best known for his work in calculating the heights of pyramids and the distance of the ships from the shore using geometry. 5. Aristotle Aristotle had a diverse knowledge over various areas including mathematics, geology, physics, metaphysics, biology, medicine and psychology. He was a pupil of Plato therefore it’s not a surprise that he had a vast knowledge and made contributions towards Platonism. Tutored Alexander the Great and established a library which aided in the production of hundreds of books.
  • Chapter Two Democritus and the Different Limits to Divisibility

    Chapter Two Democritus and the Different Limits to Divisibility

    CHAPTER TWO DEMOCRITUS AND THE DIFFERENT LIMITS TO DIVISIBILITY § 0. Introduction In the previous chapter I tried to give an extensive analysis of the reasoning in and behind the first arguments in the history of philosophy in which problems of continuity and infinite divisibility emerged. The impact of these arguments must have been enormous. Designed to show that rationally speaking one was better off with an Eleatic universe without plurality and without motion, Zeno’s paradoxes were a challenge to everyone who wanted to salvage at least those two basic features of the world of common sense. On the other hand, sceptics, for whatever reason weary of common sense, could employ Zeno-style arguments to keep up the pressure. The most notable representative of the latter group is Gorgias, who in his book On not-being or On nature referred to ‘Zeno’s argument’, presumably in a demonstration that what is without body and does not have parts, is not. It is possible that this followed an earlier argument of his that whatever is one, must be without body.1 We recognize here what Aristotle calls Zeno’s principle, that what does not have bulk or size, is not. Also in the following we meet familiar Zenonian themes: Further, if it moves and shifts [as] one, what is, is divided, not being continuous, and there [it is] not something. Hence, if it moves everywhere, it is divided everywhere. But if that is the case, then everywhere it is not. For it is there deprived of being, he says, where it is divided, instead of ‘void’ using ‘being divided’.2 Gorgias is talking here about the situation that there is motion within what is.
  • Martyred for the Church

    Martyred for the Church

    Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament · 2. Reihe Herausgeber / Editor Jörg Frey (Zürich) Mitherausgeber/Associate Editors Markus Bockmuehl (Oxford) · James A. Kelhoffer (Uppsala) Tobias Nicklas (Regensburg) · J. Ross Wagner (Durham, NC) 471 Justin Buol Martyred for the Church Memorializations of the Effective Deaths of Bishop Martyrs in the Second Century CE Mohr Siebeck Justin Buol, born 1983; 2005 BA in Biblical and Theological Studies, Bethel University; 2007 MA in New Testament, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School; 2009 MA in Classical and Near Eastern Studies, University of Minnesota; 2017 PhD in Christianity and Judaism in Antiquity, University of Notre Dame; currently an adjunct professor at Bethel University. ISBN 978-3-16-156389-8 / eISBN 978-3-16-156390-4 DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-156390-4 ISSN 0340-9570 / eISSN 2568-7484 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, 2. Reihe) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen, Germany. www.mohrsiebeck.com This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to repro- ductions, translations and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Laupp & Göbel in Gomaringen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Nädele in Nehren. Printed in Germany. Preface This monograph represents a revised version of my doctoral dissertation. It has been updated to take into account additional scholarly literature, bring in new argumentation, and shorten some sections for relevance.
  • Adversus Paganos: Disaster, Dragons, and Episcopal Authority in Gregory of Tours

    Adversus Paganos: Disaster, Dragons, and Episcopal Authority in Gregory of Tours

    Adversus paganos: Disaster, Dragons, and Episcopal Authority in Gregory of Tours David J. Patterson Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Volume 44, 2013, pp. 1-28 (Article) Published by Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, UCLA DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2013.0000 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/cjm/summary/v044/44.patterson.html Access provided by University of British Columbia Library (29 Aug 2013 02:49 GMT) ADVERSUS PAGANOS: DISASTER, DRAGONS, AND EPISCOPAL AUTHORITY IN GREGORY OF TOURS David J. Patterson* Abstract: In 589 a great flood of the Tiber sent a torrent of water rushing through Rome. According to Gregory of Tours, the floodwaters carried some remarkable detritus: several dying serpents and, perhaps most strikingly, the corpse of a dragon. The flooding was soon followed by plague and the death of a pope. This remarkable chain of events leaves us with puzzling questions: What significance would Gregory have located in such a narrative? For a modern reader, the account (apart from its dragon) reads like a descrip- tion of a natural disaster. Yet how did people in the early Middle Ages themselves per- ceive such events? This article argues that, in making sense of the disasters at Rome in 589, Gregory revealed something of his historical consciousness: drawing on both bibli- cal imagery and pagan historiography, Gregory struggled to identify appropriate objects of both blame and succor in the wake of calamity. Keywords: plague, natural disaster, Gregory of Tours, Gregory the Great, Asclepius, pagan survivals, dragon, serpent, sixth century, Rome. In 589, a great flood of the Tiber River sent a torrent of water rushing through the city of Rome.
  • Platonist Philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria in Amenabar’S Film Agorá

    Platonist Philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria in Amenabar’S Film Agorá

    A STUDY OF THE RECEPTION OF THE LIFE AND DEATH OF THE NEO- PLATONIST PHILOSOPHER HYPATIA OF ALEXANDRIA IN AMENABAR’S FILM AGORÁ GILLIAN van der HEIJDEN Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Faculty of Humanities School of Religion, Philosophy and Classics at the UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL, DURBAN SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR J.L. HILTON MARCH 2016 DECLARATION I, Gillian van der Heijden, declare that: The research reported in this dissertation, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research; This dissertation has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university; This dissertation does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons; The dissertation does not contain other persons’ writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: a) their words have been re-written but the general information attributed to them has been referenced; b) where their exact words have been used, their writing has been paragraphed and referenced; c) This dissertation/thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the dissertation/thesis and in the References sections. Signed: Gillian van der Heijden (Student Number 209541374) Professor J. L. Hilton ii ABSTRACT The film Agorá is better appreciated through a little knowledge of the rise of Christianity and its opposition to Paganism which professed ethical principles inherited from Greek mythology and acknowledged, seasonal rituals and wealth in land and livestock.
  • The Fathers of the Church ; V

    The Fathers of the Church ; V

    THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH A NEW TRANSLATION VOLUME 99 THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH A NEW TRANSLATION EDITORIAL BOARD Thomas P. Halton The Catholic University of America Editorial Director Elizabeth Clark Robert D. Sider Duke University Dickinson College Joseph T. Lienhard, S.J. Michael Slusser Fordham University Duquesne University Frank A.C. Mantello Cynthia White The Catholic University of America The University of Arizona Kathleen McVey Robin Darling Young Princeton Theological Seminary The Catholic University of America David J. McGonagle Director The Catholic University of America Press FORMER EDITORIAL DIRECTORS Ludwig Schopp, Roy J. Deferrari, Bernard M. Peebles, Hermigild Dressler, O.F.M. Cornelia Horn Staff Editor IBERIAN FATHERS volume 3 PACIAN OF BARCELONA OROSIUS OF BRAGA Translated by CRAIG L. HANSON Muskingum College New Concord, Ohio THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS Washington, D.C. Copyright © 1999 THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standards for Information Science— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48–1984. ∞ library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Iberian fathers : Pacian of Barcelona and Orosius of Braga : [writings] / translated by Craig L. Hanson. p. cm. — (The fathers of the church ; v. 99) Includes bibliographical references and Indexes. ISBN 0-8132- 0099-7 (alk. paper) 1. Theology—Early works to 1800. 2. Apologetics—Early
  • P ALLADAS of ALEXANDRIA on WOMEN William Henderson

    P ALLADAS of ALEXANDRIA on WOMEN William Henderson

    ACTA G.ASSICA LJI (2009) 83-100 ISSN 0065-1141 P ALLADAS OF ALEXANDRIA ON WOMEN William Henderson University of Johannesburg ABSTRACT Among the epigrams collected in the Palatine and Planudean Anthologies under the name of Palladas of Alexandria (c. 350 CE), thirteen are explicitly concerned with the theme of women (9.165-168; 10.55, 56, 86; 11.54, 286, 287, 306, 381, 378). In this article the language and content of these poems are analysed in order to determine the poet's views on and attitude to women and the way he communicates these. Introduction Palladas was active in Alexandria around the second half of the 4th century CE. This dating is deduced from references in his poems to Themistius, praefectus urbi of Constantinople in 384 (11.292), 1 the destruction of the Sarapeion library and other pagan sanctuaries by Christians in 391 after the edict of Theodosius, the emperor in the East (10.90; 9.528, 175; cf. 9.37) and perhaps the defeat of Eugenius, usurper emperor in the West in 394 (10.84). By his own admission he wrote 10.97, probably in 391, at the age of 72, which would place his birth around 319. 2 Palladas is represented in the Anthologia Palatina and Anthologia Planudea by about 160 epigrams - more than any other poet in these collections.3 His epigrams were known among all classes, also in written form. 4 On the other hand, modern assessments of his work have been negative or ambiguous. Thus Paton, in his Introduction to Book 9 of the Palatine, writes dismissive­ ly: 'It [Philippus's GarlandJ contains a good deal of the Alexandrian Palladas, 1 Palladas's epigrams in the Anthologia Palatina (AP) and Anthologia Plan11dea (AP~ are cited by book and poem number alone.
  • Democritus (460-370 BC) on Embryology, Anatomy and Pediatrics: the Unknown Aspects of the Greek Atomic Scientist

    Democritus (460-370 BC) on Embryology, Anatomy and Pediatrics: the Unknown Aspects of the Greek Atomic Scientist

    IJAE Vol. 117, n. 3: 199-204, 2012 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY Research Article: History Of Anatomy and Embryology Democritus (460-370 BC) on Embryology, Anatomy and Pediatrics: the unknown aspects of the Greek atomic scientist Gregory Tsoucalas, Marianna Karamanou*, Antonis A. Kousoulis, George Androutsos History of Medicine Department, Medical School, University of Athens, Greece Submitted January 29, 2012; accepted June 17, 2012 Abstract Democritus was born in Abdera, Thrace, in the 5th century BC. He travelled to the East while being the student of famous philosophers. His philosophical ideas and the establishment of particles, “the atoms”, gave him a leading position in world history. However, his medical knowledge was vast especially in the field of pediatric pharmacology. Numerous are also the reports of his passion for anatomy. Democritus’ views regarding the issue of Human Nature and Anatomy are depicted in a letter he sent to Hippocrates of Kos. He died in old age, possi- bly of infection after having totally neglected his personal hygiene. Keywords Democritus; philosophy; atom; embryology; pediatrics; anatomy. Note: for ancient authors, citations in the text do not include the year of publication of the original writings; the reference list reports the year of publication of the critical edition which was used for this study. Introductory note and brief biography Democritus of Igisistratos or Athinocratos or Damasippos (Precope, 1961; Marcov- ich, 1999) was born in Abdera, Thrace, Greece, around the 80th Olympic Games, 460- 457 BC (Herodotus; Strabo) or earlier (Anaksagoras Klazomenios). He visited Egypt where, in the sanctuary of Memphis, he was initiated to Jewish spirituality by a sage woman named Maria.