DOCSLIB.ORG

AND TRANSIT-FRIENDLY DESIGN: a Primer for Smart Growth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AND TRANSIT-FRIENDLY DESIGN: a Primer for Smart Growth PEDESTRIAN- AND TRANSIT-FRIENDLY DESIGN: A Primer for Smart Growth by Reid Ewing Based on a manual prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation and published by the American Planning Association The Smart Growth Network is a coalition of private sector, public sector, and nonprofit Table of Contents partners seeking to create better neighbor- hoods, communities, and regions across the Introduction .................................... 1 #14 Closely Spaced Shade Trees along United States. It is coordinated by the U.S. En- Access Routes .................................. 13 vironmental Protection Agencys Urban and Economic Development Division. Checklist of Pedestrian- and #15 Little Dead Space, or Visible Transit-Friendly Features ................ 2 Parking ............................................. 14 Reid Ewing is Research Director of the Sur- #16 Nearby Parks and Other Public face Transportation Policy Project, Washington, Essential Features ........................................ 2 Spaces ............................................... 16 D.C. and Senior Associate with Fehr & Peers #1 Medium-to-High Densities ................. 2 Transportation Consultants, Lafayette, CA. #17 Small-Scale Buildings (or Articulated #2 Mix of Land Uses ............................. 3 Larger Ones) .................................... 18 The primer was laid out by Suzanne #3 Short to Medium Length Blocks ..... 3 Lambert, Multimedia Technology Program #18 Classy Looking Transit Facilities ..... 18 manager at Broward Community College, #4 Transit Routes Every Half-Mile ...... 5 Pembroke Pines, FL. #5 Two-or Four-Lane Streets (with Rare Nice Additional Features ........................... 18 #19 Streetwalls ........................................ 18 Special thanks to Tara Bartee of the Florida Exceptions)......................................... 6 Department of Transportation for her coop- #6 Continuous Sidewalks Wide Enough #20 Functional Street Furniture ............... 18 eration and support in producing the manual for Couples ......................................... 6 #21 Coherent, Small-Scale Signage ........ 18 upon which this primer is based. #7 Safe Crossings .................................. 8 #22 Special Pavement ............................. 20 The International City/County Management #8 Appropriate Buffering from Association serves as the organizational home #23 Lovable Objects, Especially Traffic ............................................... 10 of the Smart Growth Network (SGN) and runs Public Art.......................................... 21 the SGN membership program. #9 Street-Oriented Buildings ................. 10 Endnotes ...................................... 23 #10 Comfortable and Safe Places to Wait .............................................. 13 Highly Desirable Features ......................... 13 #11 Supportive Commercial Uses ........... 13 For more information, contact the #12 Gridlike Street Networks .................. 13 Smart Growth Network at 202-962-3591 or via the Smart Growth web site at #13 Traffic Calming along Access www.smartgrowth.org Routes ............................................... 13 Introduction Urban design differs from planning in scale, other hand, is a singularly two-dimensional ac- sign than to planning. The two primers are meant orientation, and treatment of space. The scale tivity (as illustrated below left.) to be read in tandem. of design is primarily that of the street, park, or transit stop, as opposed to the larger region, com- Another primer available from the Smart This primer is based on Pedestrian- and munity, or activity center. The orientation of Growth Network, Best Development Practices: Transit-Friendly Design, a manual prepared for design is aesthetic, broadly defined. Design lies A Primer for Smart Growth, approaches devel- the Florida Department of Transportation somewhere between art, whose object is beauty, opment and redevelopment from a planning per- (FDOT) and the American Planning Associa- and planning, whose object is functionality. The spective. Scant attention is paid to aesthetics, tion (APA). The primer and manual draw pri- treatment of space in design is three-dimen- small-scale elements, and the vertical dimen- marily on three sourcesthe classic urban de- sional, with vertical elements as important as sion of development. The present primer takes sign literature, the best transit-oriented design horizontal ones in designing street space, park the opposite tack, giving more attention to de- manuals, and our own transit-related studies space, and other urban spaces. Planning, on the undertaken to give the manual an empirical base. Zooming in from Planning to Design (Miami Lakes, FL) Source: Dover & Kohl, South Miami, FL 1 Checklist of Pedestrian- and Transit-Friendly Features Pedestrian- and transit-friendly design fea- at one or both ends of their trips, the distinction were in the range of 40 to 80 people per acre; tures fall into three classes: those deemed es- is illusory. Pedestrian-friendly features are also such densities compressed enough activities sential; those deemed highly desirable; and inherently transit-friendly. They set the context into a small area to allow people to walk to those deemed nice but somewhat incidental. in which transit operates and, as transit opera- almost everything. Today, in developing ar- Even the third class will encourage street life, tors are discovering, have as much to do with eas, gross densities are one-tenth the histori- walking, and transit use, but for transit opera- ridership as do service headways, fare levels, cal norm. Such low densities are practical only tors, local governments, and developers, the and other transit operating characteristics. because the automobile allows us to overcome priorities are as indicated. great distances. Interestingly, many of these 23 features are It must be acknowledged up front that sort- now perceived as critical enough to the success People confuse high density with high rise. ing pedestrian- and transit-friendly features into of transit to have found their way into the new High densities can be achieved with small-scale three classes involves a leap of faith. But sort surface transportation act, the Transportation Eq- buildings by raising lot coverages to 50, 60, or we must. Choices must be made in the align- uity Act for the 21st Century. The act earmarks even 70 percent. Conversely, high-rise build- ment of transit routes, in the amenities offered funds for bus shelters, landscaping, street fur- ings afford only moderate densities if surrounded along walking routes, in the development prac- niture, walkways, public art, transit connections by acres of parking and lawn. Pedestrians are tices that are required rather than simply en- to parks, and other transit enhancements. It comfortable with small-scale buildings and high couraged. also creates an entirely new program, the Trans- lot coverages. They are uncomfortable with portation and Community and System Preser- high-rise towers and low lot coverages. [M]uch From the longer list of 23 pedestrian- and vation Pilot Program, which provides funding of the criticism of high-rise living and its so- transit-friendly features in the FDOT/APA for coordinated land use and transportation plan- cially alienating effects is not due to its high manual, the sections that follow highlight 12. ning, traffic calming, and transit-oriented de- density but to its low density at ground level, They are described in detail, and illustrated with velopment. where nearly all public interaction must occur.1 photos from walkable places and with graphics reproduced from award-winning design manu- The weight of available evidence points to als. The other 11 features are simply acknowl- the importance of density in promoting walking edged by name. For a detailed discussion of Essential Features and transit use.2 Higher densities mean more these features, see the manual upon which this residents or employees within walking distance primer is based. #1 Medium-to-High Densities of transit stops and stations. They mean more street life and the added interest and security The 12 highlighted features seem to relate Densities in the United States have taken that goes with having more people around. They more to pedestrians than to transit users. But a nose dive over the past 40 years. Before mean a greater propensity to walk or use tran- since virtually all transit users are pedestrians mechanized transportation, gross densities sit, and lower auto ownership rates. 2 Low Rise with High Density vs. High Rise with Low Density at Ground Level Ideally, the very highest densities will be closest to transit stops. A density gradient will (The Kentlands, MD) (Las Colinas, TX) maximize transit ridership. While densities may decline with distance from stops, they will av- erage at least the threshold values within the quarter mile service area around stops. #2 Mix of Land Uses #3 Short to Medium Length Blocks There has been a trend toward longer and longer blocks, and correspondingly fewer and The old rule of thumb is that seven units per As important as high residential densities, fewer intersections within development and re- acre are required to support basic bus service. perhaps more important, are high employment development areas. This is true not only in the For premium bus service, the required residen- densities. The rule of thumb in this case is that suburbs, where superblocks are the norm, but tial density rises to 15 units per acre.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ken Matthews: 1934-2019
    KEN MATTHEWS: 1934-2019 The world’s racewalking community was saddened in June 2019 to hear of the passing of Ken Matthews, Great Britain’s last surviving Olympic race walking Gold medallist. His death occurred on the evening of Sunday 2 nd June in Wrexham where he was a hospital in-patient. Kenneth ("Ken") Joseph Matthews was born on 21 June 1934 in Birmingham and started his race walk career as an 18- year-old, following in the footsteps of his father, Joe, who was a founding member of the now defunct Royal Sutton Coldfield Walking Club. Throughout his athletics career, Ken remained Midlands based, and remained a loyal member of Royal Sutton Coldfield Walking Club. An electrical maintenance engineer at a power station near his hometown of Sutton Coldfield, he became one of England's most successful ever racewalkers and dominated the world stage throughout the early 1960's. He won 17 national titles, as well as Olympic and European gold and, between 1964 to 1971 he held every British record from 5 miles to 2 hours, including a 10-mile world best of 69:40.6. Perhaps surprisingly, he did not dominate as a youngster and it was not until 1959, at age 25, that he won his first British titles – the RWA's 10 miles road title and the AAA's 2 miles and 7 miles track titles. 1 From then on, he was pretty much unbeatable in England, but the British race most people remember is, interestingly, a loss rather than a victory. In spectacle, excitement and sheer athleticism, the 1960 AAA 2 mile duel between Stan Vickers and Ken stands comparison with any of the great races in the history of the championships.
    [Show full text]
  • The ARTS Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Update
    “The ARTS Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Update envisions a seamless network of safe and inviting bicycling and walking paths, trails, and on-street facilities, between South Carolina, Georgia and the four member counties, that equitably supports economic development, active transportation, healthy lifestyles and improved quality of life for all citizens and visitors of the region.” Chapter V Two ision , Goa ls, and Objectives 1.1. Objective: Ensure that accommodations for Introduction bicyclists and pedestrians are provided on Based on goals and objectives of existing local all appropriate infrastructure projects where and regional planning documents, the input of pedestrians and bicyclists are permitted to the Project’s steering committee, the project travel. purpose, and relevant examples from around 1.2. Objective: Integrate bicycle and pedes- the country, vision, goals, and objectives are trian facilities in their projects, including, but listed below. The goals and objectives are not limited to, transit, development, public categorized by five of the six E’s associated works, infrastructure, and recreation facili- with bicycle- and walk-friendly community ties. designations. The five E’s are: Engineering, 1.3. Objective: Improve the level of service for Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, and existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Evaluation. Equity is considered a sixth E and the member counties. is interwoven within the goals and objectives 1.4. Objective: Increase the mileage of bicycle provided. Objectives 1.6, 1.7, and 3.3 give and pedestrian facilities by fifteen percent particular attention to equity, though it should in each of the region’s four counties within be addressed within the implementation of the next 5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Traffic Control Zone Pedestrian Access Considerations
    Guidance Sheet - Temporary Traffic Control Zone Maintaining Pedestrian Pathways in TTC Zones If a project allows pedestrian access through part of the TTC zone, the pathway should be properly Pedestrian Access Considerations maintained. Note that tape, rope, or a plastic chain strung between devices is not detectable; their use does not comply with the design standards in the ADA or the MUTCD, and these items should not be used as a control for pedestrian movements. When implemented, the following recommendations should improve When developing temporary traffic control (TTC) plans, the importance of pedestrian access in and around safety and convenience: the work zone is often overlooked or underestimated. A basic requirement of work zone traffic control, as provided in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), is that the needs of pedestrians, v Inspect pathways regularly, and keep them clear of debris and well-maintained. including those with disabilities, must be addressed in the TTC process. Pedestrians should be provided with reasonably safe, convenient, and accessible paths that replicate as nearly as practical the most v Treat surfaces with non-slip materials for inclement weather. desirable characteristics of the existing sidewalks or footpaths. It is essential to recognize that pedestrians are reluctant to retrace their steps to a prior intersection for a crossing, or to add distance or out-of-the-way v Replace walkway surfaces with holes, cracks, or vertical separation. travel to a destination. This guidance sheet serves to remind TTC designers and construction personnel of v Inspect detour pathways regularly for adequacy of signal timing, signs, and potential traffic the importance of pedestrian access, to stress the need for pedestrian safety, and to offer suggestions that will improve the visibility of pedestrian access.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Crossings: Uncontrolled Locations
    Pedestrian Crossings: Uncontrolled Locations CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION STUDIES Pedestrian Crossings: Uncontrolled Locations June 2014 Published By Minnesota Local Road Research Board (LRRB) Web: www.lrrb.org MnDOT Office of Maintenance MnDOT Research Services Section MS 330, 395 John Ireland Blvd. St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Phone: 651-366-3780 Fax: 651-366-3789 E-mail: [email protected] Acknowledgements The financial and logistical support provided by the Minnesota Local DATA COLLECTION Road Research Board, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), and the Minnesota Local Technical Assistance Program John Hourdos and Stephen Zitzow, University of Minnesota (LTAP) at the Center for Transportation Studies (CTS), University of PRODUCTION Minnesota for this work is greatly acknowledged. Research, Development, and Writing: Bryan Nemeth, Ross Tillman, The procedures presented in this report were developed based on infor- Jeremy Melquist, and Ashley Hudson, Bolton & Menk, Inc. mation from previously published research studies and reports and newly collected field data. Editing: Christine Anderson, CTS The authors would also like to thank the following individuals and orga- Graphic Design: Abbey Kleinert and Cadie Wright Adikhary, CTS, and nizations for their contributions to this document. David Breiter, Bolton & Menk, Inc. TECHNICAL ADVISORY PANEL MEMBERS Tony Winiecki , Scott County Pete Lemke, Hennepin County Kate Miner, Carver County Tim Plath, City of Eagan Mitch Rasmussen, Scott County Jason Pieper, Hennepin County Mitch Bartelt, MnDOT This material was developed by Bolton & Menk, Inc., in coordination with the Minne- Melissa Barnes, MnDOT sota Local Road Research Board for use by practitioners. Under no circumstances shall Tim Mitchell, MnDOT this guidebook be sold by third parties for profit.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret's Bridge Opened by Prime Minister
    walkerSOUTH EAST No. 104 December 2018 Margaret's bridge opened by Prime Minister heresa May, as MP for The opening ceremony was Maidenhead, took a break organised by the Royal Borough Tfrom the day job on 14 of Windsor and Maidenhead September to open the bridge in in conjunction with East Berks honour of Margaret Bowdery, the Ramblers. Margaret's husband tireless Ramblers' campaigner in Bernard and son Nigel were there, East Berkshire, who died in 2016. and East Berks Ramblers were well- The bridge crosses The Cut and represented by a number of former links Braywick Park and the Green Chairmen and others. The Mayor, Way with Bray Road, creating a safe Paul Lion, introduced the speakers. and pleasant route for walkers and Kate Ashbrook, speaking as Chair cyclists. The low angle ramps at each of Ramblers GB, talked about end mean the bridge is accessible to all. Margaret's drive and determination The bridge was funded by developers to improve the sorry state of the in mitigation for nearby building and paths network she found when she is constructed from sustainable, low moved to Maidenhead in 1964. maintenance materials. The county council told her that the paths were not needed and should be extinguished. Margaret's response was to call a public meeting and Cutting the ribbon: left to right Mayor Paul Lion, Theresa May MP, Kate Ashbrook and council leader Simon Dudley. form the East Berks Ramblers group Photo: Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead to clear, waymark and sort out the Council, talked of the difference that granted.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING and DESIGNING for PEDESTRIANS Table of Contents
    PLANNING AND DESIGNING FOR PEDESTRIANS Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................1 1.1 Scope of Guidelines.............................................................................. 2 1.2 How the Pedestrian-Oriented Design Guidelines Can be Used........ 5 1.3 How to Use the Chapters and Who Should Use Them ...................... 6 2. Pedestrian Primer ...................................................................9 2.1 What is Pedestrian-Oriented Design? ................................................. 9 2.2 Link Between Land Use and Transportation Decisions .................. 10 2.3 Elements of a Walkable Environment ............................................... 11 2.4 What Kind of Street Do You Have and What Kind Do You Want?... 12 2.4.1 "Linear" and "Nodal" Structures .......................................................................... 12 2.4.2 Interconnected or Isolated Streets ....................................................................... 14 2.4.3 Street Rhythm......................................................................................................... 15 2.4.4 "Seams" and "Dividers" ........................................................................................ 16 3. Community Structure and Transportation Planning.........17 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 17 3.2 Land Use Types and Organization..................................................... 18
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking About Pedestrians from the Start
    TOOLBOX SECTION 1 Thinking about Pedestrians from the Start― Creating Pedestrian -Friendly Communities Pedestrian-friendly communities are often the most desirable places to live, work, and visit. IN THIS CREATING consideration of all modes and users on all public highways, roadways, and streets statewide. SECTION PEDESTRIAN- FRIENDLY Research has shown that well planned, designed, and maintained pedestrian facilities • WHY PLANNING FOR PEDESTRIANS IS IMPORTANT COMMUNITIES encourage walking and promote higher • GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PEDESTRIAN levels of pedestrian travel. When pedestrian FACILITIES This first section of the Hawaii Pedestrian Toolbox access is expanded and existing conditions for • DEVELOPING PEDESTRIAN PLANS provides an overview of important considerations pedestrians are improved, higher numbers of • EFFECTIVE EDUCATION, ENFORCEMENT, related to planning and general design of facilities ENCOURAGEMENT, EVALUATION, AND pedestrians can be expected to use the system. EQUITY PROGRAMS for pedestrians. Creating pedestrian-friendly This not only applies to development of new • THE “BIGGER PICTURE”—CREATING communities is an important focus of this section, PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY COMMUNITIES facilities, but also to improvement and retrofit and addressing pedestrians’ needs as part of every • CONTEXT-BASED PLANNING of existing facilities for pedestrian use. • CONNECTIVITY planning effort and project is encouraged. Best • CREATING A CONTINUOUS practices guidance that can be applied at a district, PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM community, or regional
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing Guard Manuals As References
    KANSAS GUIDELINES FOR SCHOOL CROSSING GUARDS PRODUCED BY THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (KDOT) AND THE KANSAS SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD COMMITTEE Summer 2006 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Sincere appreciation is expressed to the following persons who where instrumental in preparing this document, "Kansas Guidelines for School Crossing Guards." Kansas School Crossing Guard Committee David A. Church, Bureau Chief Bureau of Traffic Engineering Kansas Department of Transportation Cheryl Hendrixson, Traffic Engineer Bureau of Traffic Engineering Kansas Department of Transportation Larry E. Bluthardt, Supervisor School Bus Safety Education Unit Kansas Department of Education David Schwartz, Highway Safety Engineer Bureau of Traffic Safety Kansas Department of Transportation Paul Ahlenius, Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator Bureau of Transportation Planning Kansas Department of Transportation Vicky Johnson, Attorney IV Office of Chief Counsel Kansas Department of Transportation Adam Pritchard, Traffic Engineer Bureau of Traffic Engineering Kansas Department of Transportation Additional copies of these guidelines can be obtained by calling or writing: Kansas Department of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Engineering Eisenhower State Office Building 700 SW Harrison, 6th floor Topeka, KS 66603-3754 Telephone: 785-296-8593 FAX: 785 296-3619 Electronic copies are also available at the following website: http://www.ksdot.org/burTrafficEng/sztoolbox/default.asp 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Won't Crosswalks Make It Safer to Cross Streets?
    About Cross Walks: Won’t Crosswalks make it safer to cross streets? A crosswalk is that area of a roadway where pedestrians have the right of way. Crosswalks may be “marked” or “unmarked”. A “marked crosswalk” is any crosswalk which is delineated by painted markings placed on the pavement. All other crosswalk locations are therefore “unmarked”. Under the Arizona Law, crosswalks exist at all intersections, extending across the street from the corner curbs, or on other parts of the street designated as pedestrian crossing locations by the painted lines, unless signed otherwise. Arizona State law states the following in ARS 28-793. Crossing at other than crosswalk A. A pedestrian crossing a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles on the roadway. B. A pedestrian crossing a roadway at a point where a pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian crossing has been provided shall yield the right-of- way to all vehicles on the roadway. C. Between adjacent intersections at which traffic control signals are in operation, pedestrians shall not cross at any place except in a marked crosswalk. Q: Are marked crosswalks safer than unmarked crosswalks? A: The City of San Diego conducted a study on the issue in the 1970's, and the report conclusions are often cited as the first comprehensive study of crosswalk safety. Investigators in San Diego observed over 400 intersections during a five-year study period. The results demonstrated that during the five- year period, 177 pedestrians were hit in 400 marked crosswalks compared to 31 pedestrians hit in 400 corresponding unmarked crosswalks.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Streets and Alleyways – White Paper
    City of Ashland, Ashland Transportation System Plan Shared Streets and Alleyways – White Paper To: Jim Olson, City of Ashland Cc: Project Management Team From: Adrian Witte and Drew Meisel, Alta Planning + Design Date: February 2, 2011 Re: Task 7.1.O White Paper: “Shared Streets and Alleyways” - DRAFT Direction to the Planning Commission and Transportation Commission Five sets of white papers are being produced to present information on tools, opportunities, and potential strategies that could help Ashland become a nationwide leader as a green transportation community. Each white paper will present general information regarding a topic and then provide ideas on where and how that tool, strategy, and/or policy could be used within Ashland. You will have the opportunity to review the content of each white paper and share your thoughts, concerns, questions, and ideas in a joint Planning Commission/Transportation Commission meeting. Based on discussions at the meeting, the material in the white paper will be: 1) Revised and incorporated into the alternatives analysis for the draft TSP; or 2) Eliminated from consideration and excluded from the alternatives analysis. The overall intent of the white paper series is to explore opportunities and discuss the many possibilities for Ashland. Shared Streets Introduction Shared Streets aim to provide a better balance of the needs of all road users to improve safety, comfort, and livability. They are similar to European concepts such as the Dutch based ‘Woonerf’ and the United Kingdom’s ‘Home Zone’, with some distinct differences. This balance is accomplished through integration rather than segregation of users. By eschewing many of the traditional roadway treatments such as curbs, signs, and pavement markings, the distinction between modes is blurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking, Crossing Streets and Choosing Pedestrian Routes: a Survey of Recent Insights from the Social/Behavioral Sciences Michael R
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 1984 Walking, Crossing Streets and Choosing Pedestrian Routes: A Survey of Recent Insights from the Social/Behavioral Sciences Michael R. Hill University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Walking, Crossing Streets and Choosing Pedestrian Routes: A Survey of Recent Insights from the Social/Behavioral Sciences" (1984). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 462. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/462 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R. 1984. Walking, Crossing Streets and Choosing Pedestrian Routes: A Survey of Recent Insights from the Social/Behavioral Sciences, by Michael R. Hill. (University of Nebraska Studies, No. 66). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska. Walking, Crossing Streets, and Choosing Pedestrian Routes The llniversity ofNebraska The Board ofRegents KERMIT R. HANSEN MARGARET ROBINSON chairman EDWARD SCHWARTZKOPF NANCY HOCH vice chairman ROBERT R. KOEFOOT, M.D. ROBERT G. SIMMONS, JR. JAMES H. MOYLAN WILLIAM F. SWANSON JOHN W. PAYNE corporation secretary President RONALD W. ROSKENS Chancellor, University ofNebraska-Lincoln MARTIN A. MASSENGALE Committee on Scholarly Publications J. MICHAEL DALY HENRY F. HOLTZCLAW, JR. DAVID H. GILBERT ex officio executive secretary DAVID M. NICHOLAS ex officio YEN-CHING PAO E.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Pedestrian Level-Of-Service Index for Transit
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Master's Theses University of Connecticut Graduate School 5-5-2012 Creating a Pedestrian Level-of-Service Index for Transit Stops: Evidence from Denver’s Light Rail System Patrick Gallagher University of Connecticut, [email protected] Recommended Citation Gallagher, Patrick, "Creating a Pedestrian Level-of-Service Index for Transit Stops: Evidence from Denver’s Light Rail System" (2012). Master's Theses. 268. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/gs_theses/268 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Connecticut Graduate School at OpenCommons@UConn. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenCommons@UConn. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Creating a Pedestrian Level-of-Service Index for Transit Stops: Evidence from Denver’s Light Rail System Patrick James Gallagher B.A., State University of New York, College at Geneseo, 2010 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of the Arts At the University of Connecticut 2012 i APPROVAL PAGE Master of Arts Thesis Creating a Pedestrian Level-of-Service Index for Transit Stops: Evidence from Denver’s Light Rail System Present by Patrick J. Gallagher, B.A. Major Advisor _________________________________________________________________ Carol Atkinson-Palombo, Ph.D. Associate Advisor ______________________________________________________________ Robert Cromley, Ph.D. Associate Advisor ______________________________________________________________ Norman Garrick, Ph.D. University of Connecticut 2012 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost I would like to thank my advisor Carol Atkinson-Palombo who spent countless hours giving me feedback and guidance over the last year. I would also like to thank my associate advisors Robert Cromley and Norman Garrick for their insightful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]