DOCSLIB.ORG

(PCS0174) Extinction Rebellion Families Is a Community Political Action Grou

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(PCS0174) Extinction Rebellion Families Is a Community Political Action Grou Written evidence from Extinction Rebellion Families (PCS0174) Extinction Rebellion Families is a community political action group that formed as a family orientated branch of Extinction Rebellion. Our primary concern is the climate crisis and the relevant government inaction that is affecting all of our lives, and will especially impact our children. We are made up of thousands of families from all over the UK. We have put this report together from evidence collected by survey from our members. We have addressed three of the proposed questions. 1. Are the proposed changes to the law governing public assemblies, processions and one-person protests necessary to protect those adversely affected by such activities? No. ‘When I was a student I protested against the war in Iraq, and against inaction on climate change. I have also marched with the Kurdish community in London against the Turkish State bombing civilians living in the town of Afrin in Northern Syria. My sister Anna was killed in Afrin by Turkish Airstrikes while she was evacuating civilians. The danger comes from authorities, governments and people in positions of power, not from the protestors, who are there to hold these groups accountable.’ 100% of our members who took the survey reported that protest was a positive experience for them and their families. Our members reported feeling safe and uplifted whilst being part of peaceful protests that seek to raise awareness of the climate and ecological emergency. Experiences have been pleasant, community and solidarity strengthening. 1 ‘I take my children to XR demonstrations because I want to give them a road map for action. The only time I have felt threatened while protesting was due to police officers. I was in Whitehall in London, during a protest in October 2019. Police blocked me from leaving the area whilst I was walking down the public pavement with my toddler in a buggy. This was just because I was suspected of being part of the protest.’ ‘Being able to protest has had an extremely positive impact on my life and my children's lives. My kids love protests and standing up for what they believe in.’ ‘Protestors have never made me feel threatened in any way. They have opened my eyes up to corruption.’ The changes in this law are not to protect the protestors, but are instead to protect businesses, the government and corporations from financial losses. We are acutely aware that the most serious harm being caused to populations all over the world is due to pollution and exploitation of land, resources and people. Our members saw restrictions in section 59 of the bill as hypocritical; It is the Government that is causing “serious harm to the public” (Section 59 (1) (b) (i)) by its inaction on the climate emergency; The Government’s inadequacy to address the crisis is leading to the public “suffering serious distress, serious annoyance, serious inconvenience and serious loss of amenity” (Section 59 (2) (c)) that far exceeds any protest. It is the Government that is “obstructing the public right to enjoy” (Section 59 (1) (b) (ii)) the natural world as they continue to exploit and destroy it by polluting, and with mass deforestation schemes. Climate change has been causing more severe flooding in recent years, and food shortages and food poverty are becoming more prevalent. These are examples of how the government are causing “personal injury and loss of and damage to property” (Section 59 (2) (b)). The Government is refusing to address or take satisfactory action to deal 2 with root cause of these problems. Peaceful protest is the only way to stand up against these threats, and with these restrictions in place, there will be no way for the general public to demand better from their leaders. XR Families demand the government pay attention. We hold them to account with our actions, and bring the danger that the government is putting us in to public attention. Protest gives our children a platform. As they cannot vote, it is the only way that young people’s voices can be heard in our political system. Climate anxiety and depression are rising issues in the general population, especially with young people. Taking part in protest and political activism improves the mental health of people with these rational fears and anxieties. If their rights to participate in this part of democracy are taken, they will “suffer serious distress” as a result. By seeking to protect those adversely affected the government is adversely affecting the wellbeing of others – effectively deciding whose wellbeing is most important. 2. Do the proposals in part 3 of the bill adequately protect the right to peaceful assembly (Article 11 ECHR) and the right to free expression (Article 10 ECHR)? No, they don’t. 100% of our members reported that this bill put too many restrictions on what is acceptable to protest, to the extent that protest will not be effective. 68% reported that with this bill, they will be afraid to exercise their rights to protest. 47% reported that they would be less likely to take part in protest with these heavier restrictions in place. 3 As a group, we follow the science and take proportionate action out of necessity in the interest of national public safety, in line with the current guidelines within the ECHR. This bill would deem many of our previous demonstrations illegal. Lives are being lost due to the climate crisis, and the science shows us that if we continue to follow the current trajectory, most of our children will not reach their life expectancy. Making noise and disruption in the streets is both necessary and proportionate. Members commented on the importance of protest to democracy and social justice, and expressed concerns over the Bill’s chilling impact on their ability to exercise the right to protest: ‘Protest is essential and a fundamental human right. Without the right to protest, people have no way of standing up against injustice and voicing their unhappiness with leaders of this country. Public demonstration are also essential to show support for and highlight urgent issues and causes.’ ‘With these new laws I will not be able to protest or exercise my right to free expression as I could be arrested. As a non UK citizen I would also risk deportation, which could have severe consequences for my family. I will be in deep conflict with my conscience as we are on the brink of extinction and to sit and do nothing to change this destiny goes against all of my values and beliefs.’ ‘We are being restricted and deterred from organising family friendly action. Children will not be as able attend and take part in protests. It will exclude people from marginalised groups, carers and all those for whom arrest is not an option.’ Members also highlighted the value of protest to raise awareness and affect policy: 4 ‘Protests have raised my and my family’s awareness of important issues such as racial and gender equality and environmental issues. I feel part of a democracy that allows free speech and freedom expression’ ‘The Youth Strikes I took part in resulted in our City Council declaring a climate emergency.’ ‘These protests have had a powerful impact on both individuals and policy, raising awareness of the climate emergency and creating a collective vision of a better future.’ 3. Does the Bill give rise to any other human rights concerns? Yes. Our group is terrified about the prospect of a 4 degree warmer world. This is an existential crisis, and if those temperatures are reached, human rights will be irrelevant as humans will be entirely extinct. However, before it reaches that point, we have grave concerns over who will suffer most severely at the cost of protecting those with the most money. ‘I am hugely worried about the loss of biodiversity, rising temperatures and soil erosion. These threats pose an unimaginable risk to humanity, and need addressing swiftly and decisively. This is not being addressed with the urgency it demands and this is unlikely to change without significant public pressure. This bill will stifle this very necessary protest.’ ‘Without the right to protest, the government destruction continues and we are doomed. The poor and the marginalised, those lower and middle class families who will be most affected.’ 5 ‘I am worried about more freedoms given to the police and how they implement these against people already disproportionately affected by police injustice and brutality.’ ‘U.K. government is employing increasingly fascist methods in an attempt to combat the pushback against a damaging status quo, particularly by those concerned with environmental and social justice. I am terrified by the potential implications of removing our democratic right to protest against these injustices, meaning the government will have no opposition against the harm they can do to the most vulnerable in society.’ ‘When unacceptable things happen, people rise up to protest about them and demand change. Breaching this human right will mean that there will be no way to protect other human rights that face threat.’ 12/05/2021 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Build the Movement for a Green New Deal
    Build the Movement for a Green New Deal Whereas: The Green New Deal manifests key UU values — both “the interdependent web” and “justice, equity, and compassion”— sparking intense interest. However, this vision will require in-depth organizing and generational dedication to overcome powerful interests who disregard the scientific consensus that massive disruption lies ahead if we don’t take rapid action to address the escalating climate emergency; Whereas: Our earth has already warmed approximately 1°C, while climate catastrophes, such as flooding, droughts, wildfires, hurricanes, and species die-off, are more frequent and costly, with ballooning waves of refugees, as carbon emissions from fossil fuels are now activating powerful feedback loops in the air, oceans, and on land; Whereas: Many natural resources, such as fisheries, forests, agricultural lands, fresh water, and minerals, are being degraded or wasted by continued global economic and population growth; Whereas: Social and political stress from escalating economic and political failure is undermining popular support for democracy and human rights, especially where short-sighted economic pursuits have prevailed over equity and compassion; Whereas: Equity must replace extravagance in this new gilded age, reeling from two generations of escalating inequality, consumerism, and continued militarization, by transferring dignity and ownership to legions of proud and skilled workers to build a new and sustainable infrastructure; Be it Resolved that the Unitarian Universalist Association, its congregations, and their members are urged to: 1. Continue educating ourselves on the accelerating threats to the ecosystems and natural resources which feed and sustain our global civilization, and promote a compassionate national conversation to head off worst-case scenarios; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewpoint: Extinction Rebellion: Radical Or Rational?
    Life & Times Viewpoint streets of Hackney dressed as bees. Extinction Rebellion: We arrived nervously at Marble Arch radical or rational? on the first day of the Rebellion, not really knowing what to expect and how long we The UK government has declared a climate would stay. I was taken aback by the calm, 1 change emergency. Respected fellow GPs welcoming atmosphere and the respectful have been arrested on actions with Extinction behaviour towards the police and vice Rebellion. Initially I was perplexed by this versa. There was a palpable feeling that we and wondered how they came to take this did have agency to make decisions about course of action. Although I have friends who our future and we could act to create the have tried to fly less and become vegan for type of world we all want to live in. environmental purposes, I had never really We kept coming back to the road given serious thought to climate change blockades. We played football on the four- and its consequences, let alone participate lane roundabout of Marble Arch and we in any climate activism. I’m not really sure turned Waterloo Bridge into a playground. I have rebelled in many things in my life at As we cycled blissfully through the clean, “There was a palpable all. Over the Easter holidays, though, I found quiet streets of a car-free Central London, myself repeatedly at Extinction Rebellion’s the impossible suddenly seemed possible. feeling that we did have blockades in Central London with my young The youth climate marches led by Greta agency to make decisions son and husband (a paediatric trainee).
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rebellion in Aotearoa: the Possibilities and Pitfalls of Importing a Social Movement Organisation Huw Morgan
    Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 13 (1): 157 – 173 (July 2021) Morgan, Extinction Rebellion in Aoteoroa Extinction Rebellion in Aotearoa: the possibilities and pitfalls of importing a social movement organisation Huw Morgan Abstract As social movement organisations spread across the world in chains of influence and inspiration, local activists have an opportunity to form a branch, capitalise on the international recognition and attract new members. Extinction Rebellion in Aotearoa New Zealand did just this and faced two familiar dilemmas. At the level of strategy, we failed to respond to criticism of our key demand from some indigenous activists. At the tactical level, a lack of cohesion over the organisational structure and tactics at our formation led to a weak organisation unable to successfully engage in complicated strategic or tactical discussion. Key words: climate justice, social movement, decolonisation, organisation, structure, New Zealand, indigenous rights XR in a global context Extinction Rebellion (XR) has been widely written about, including by the co- founder of this journal. What has been less discussed - in mainstream news media and the activist media (Waltz, 2005) of which I’m aware - are the fates of XR groups that have emerged around the world, taking inspiration from, and trying to adapt, the XR model to their context. Globally, the reach of the XR social movement organisation (SMO) was most obviously seen during the 2019 October “Rebellion” - members are called rebels, since XR is in “rebellion” against governments. Across Europe, mobilisations drew consistently upwards of 200 people into action. XR France had hundreds occupying a bridge in central Paris for five days before joining an occupation of a shopping centre with the gilets jaunes, amongst other groups.1 Eastern European XR groups, notably in Prague, experienced 130 arrests for blockades that were quickly and brutally repressed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mont Pelerin Society
    A SPECIAL MEETING THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY JANUARY 15–17, 2020 FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE: IDEAS AND ACTIONS FOR A FREE SOCIETY CHAPTER SEVENTEEN THE RISE AND FALL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIALISM: SMASHING THE WATERMELON JEFF BENNETT HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY 11 The rise and fall of environmental socialism: Smashing the 1 watermelon Jeff Bennett2 1. The bad news The green gravy train is fully loaded and achieving record speeds. Rent seekers of many different varieties have taken their seats and are enjoying the largess created by the fears of environmental doom and gloom. The current season of bush fires in Australia illustrates the point. The motivating hypothesis for the fear is that climate change is causing earlier and more severe bushfires. Hence this season’s experience (with declarations of ‘catastrophic’ conditions being made for the first time ever followed by reports of ‘unprecedented’ damage) will be ‘the new normal’. Who gets the gravy once on board? 1. The politicians – who can achieve photo opportunities amidst fire ravaged communities and make announcements about immediate support for those impacted and long term interventions to address climate change. 2. The firefighting bureaucrats – who lobby for more equipment and more staff to deal with the climate change ‘emergency’. 3. The press – who get to present reports from areas that look like war zones without being shot at. 4. The scientists – who argue for more research funding to understand better (for example) the impacts of climate change on fire behaviour. 5. The green industrialists – who gain from subsidies paid to encourage the transition to a ‘de- carbonised’ economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Extinction Rebellion Movement Is Morally Justified
    Why the Extinction Rebellion Movement is Morally Justified Article by Jeff Justice June 26, 2019 Extinction Rebellion is part of a global movement that is forcing climate and environmental issues into the mainstream. Their success is based on widespread recognition of the legitimacy of their demands and action – but not before the law, as the first prosecutions of activists in the United Kingdom demonstrate. Jeff Justice draws on political theory and environmental philosophy to argue that when government inaction and irresponsibility puts people’s security at risk, rebellion is justified. Extinction Rebellion (also known as XR) recently stormed onto the environmental protest group scene. Their tactics have included occupying public spaces, displaying large banners on landmarks, and interrupting local council and even parliamentary proceedings from the public galleries with their protests and chants. They have even taken to choking major traffic arteries with large groups of slow moving cyclists and blocking streets and squares through sit-ins. The group is international; its website shows groups on every inhabited continent. It declares itself to be in a state of ‘international non-violent rebellion against the world’s governments for criminal inaction on the ecological crisis’. Extinction Rebellion has three demands: first, that governments tell the truth about the ecological crisis; second, that there be zero emissions and drawdown by 2025; and third, that participatory democracy be established. Whilst the group is indeed global in its outlook and organisation, much of the press to date focuses on activities in the UK where it was founded in 2018 and where most of its chapters currently are.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Strategic Narratives in the United Kingdom: Emergency, T Extinction, Effectiveness ⁎ Luke D
    Energy Research & Social Science 69 (2020) 101580 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Research & Social Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/erss Climate change strategic narratives in the United Kingdom: Emergency, T Extinction, Effectiveness ⁎ Luke D. Bevana, , Thomas Colley Dr.b, Mark Workman Dr.c a Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, University College London, 4th Floor, Shropshire House, 11-20 Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JA, United Kingdom b Department of War Studies, Kings College London c Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Achieving policy, business and behaviour change necessary to mitigate climate change is one of the most for- Narratives midable challenges of the twenty-first century. Increasingly, researchers have argued that communicating Climate Change purposively designed stories – ‘strategic narratives’ – may be effective in building support for the policy measures Behaviour Change necessary to limit anthropogenic warming to 2˚C above pre-industrial levels. Recently, following the release of Communication the IPCC's 1.5˚C special report, novel dynamics have emerged in climate strategic communication, with the emergence of new narrators, including youth climate strikers, child activist Greta Thunberg, and the insurgent group, Extinction Rebellion. Previous literature focuses mostly on narrative content and coherence, paying less attention to how a narrator's credibility affects climate change strategic narratives’ persuasiveness. Adopting this broader view, this paper analyses five strategic narratives that became prominent in the United Kingdom fol- lowing the IPCC report. Contrary to some previous calls for all-encompassing strategic narratives communicated top-down from governmental organisations, the most notable strategic narratives in our sample emerged from civil society.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Strategy
    Extinction Rebellion UK 2020 POWER — TOGETHER This document offers guidance, opens a space for dialogue and aims to enable our movement to continue to build in a decentralised way. Contributing working groups and signatories include: Actions circle Arts Communities Finance and fundraising Internationalist Solidarity Network Legal Support Media and messaging National And Regional Development Political circle Regenerative cultures Relationships Strategy Stewardship Team Strategy Development Team Guardianship & Visioning Team XR Youth This strategy summary accompanies a longer document which details all groups whose feedback and contributions have shaped this strategy and suggests ways to work with this strategy in your working group. INTRODUCTION In 2019 we demanded change. In 2020 we begin building the alternative. We feel what you feel - a concern for the future. We worry for the future of our youth, families and friends, our communities here and abroad, our work and how daily life is going to change, all the wildlife and nature that is no longer here. An old story is ending, a new one beginning. You have a part to play in this story - whether you’ve taken part in actions, are a signed-up rebel, or even if you’ve never heard of Extinction Rebellion. With courage we are beginning to face this Climate and Ecological Emergency, coming together from the north, the south, the east, the west. We work zero hour contracts, are CEOs of companies, farmers, teachers, parents, youth. There is room for everyone. What unites us is that itch of rebellion that found expression in this movement. Come be the change the government and corporations are refusing to make.
    [Show full text]
  • As Co-Founders of Extinction Rebellion, We've Made Many Mistakes - but Now Is the Time for Collective Action, Not Recriminations
    As co-founders of Extinction Rebellion, we've made many mistakes - but now is the time for collective action, not recriminations Extinction Rebellion activists have parked a boat on Victoria bridge in Leeds city centre Only by working together can we resolve the dilemmas facing our planet Earlier in the week, this newspaper carried a story about a report in which the author said he had uncovered evidence about one of us advocating revolution to overturn capitalism through mass protest and law-breaking. In response, weʼd just like to say we got it wrong. In fact, the two of us have been getting it wrong for years. Until we co- founded what was to become Extinction Rebellion, we were individually engaged in one failing cause after another. We persevered because we want what most people want: a future for our children where they can prosper and live in peace. And so yes, weʼve railed against the Government because they are failing to protect the people that they are elected to represent. We oppose a system that generates huge wealth through astonishing innovation but is fatally unable to distribute fairly and provide universal access to its spoils. In this, you might agree with the good folk at the Policy Exchange think tank which published the report. Either way, it doesnʼt matter because the danger is already here. For 30 years scientists have warned this was coming. We have personally failed to deal with it, and so have successive governments. The climate and ecological emergency is rooted in a mundane truth that invisibly underpins our way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Fuels: Their Impact on Climate Change and Air Pollution
    Fossil Fuels: Their Impact on Climate Change and Air Pollution Tuesday, 16th – Wednesday, 17th February 2021 Participants Titus Alexander FRSA Educator, Author, Change Agent Greg Archer UK Director, Transport and Environment Charlotte Ayoub Co-Founder, TLC Sports Richard Bourne Advisor, The Ramphal Institute Ruth Calderwood Air Quality Manager, City of London Corporation Ekatarina de Rodzianko XR Catalysers Fire Circle Joshua Dean Lecturer in Biogeochemical Cycles, University of Liverpool Deanna Emeny Claire Farrell Co-founder XR Taryn Ferguson Andrew Griffiths Head of Value Chain Sustainability, Nestlé UK Ltd Neil Grundon Deputy Chairman, Grundon Waste Management Professor Peter Head Ecological Sequestration Trust Professor Sir Stephen Holgate UK High Champion for Air Quality Professor Phil Jones Professorial Fellow, University of East Anglia Bianca Letti Senior Analyst, Climate Change Committee Ulrich Loening Dr Margaret Maclean XR International COP 26 Surinder Marshall Peter Mather President BP Europe Fossil Fuels: Their Impact on Climate Change and Air Pollution 1 Dr Alice McGushin Programme Manager, The Lancet Countdown Gary McKeone Programme Director, St George's House Professor Hugh Montgomery Professor of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London Professor Robert Nicholls University East Anglia Susannah Nicklin, CFA Chair and Non-Executive Director - Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Russell Norton Caroline Päkel Dr Douglas Parr Chief Scientist and Policy Director Greenpeace UK Professor Chris Rapley, CBE University College
    [Show full text]
  • Motivations and Intended Outcomes in Local Governments' Declarations
    Politics and Governance (ISSN: 2183–2463) 2021, Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 17–28 DOI: 10.17645/pag.v9i2.3755 Article Motivations and Intended Outcomes in Local Governments’ Declarations of Climate Emergency Xira Ruiz-Campillo 1,*, Vanesa Castán Broto 2 and Linda Westman 2 1 Department of International Relations and Global History, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Urban Institute, Interdisciplinary Centre for the Social Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S14PD, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (V.C.B.), [email protected] (L.W.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 17 October 2020 | Accepted: 23 December 2020 | Published: 28 April 2021 Abstract Near 1,500 governments worldwide, including over 1,000 local governments, have declared a climate emergency. Such declarations constitute a response to the growing visibility of social movements in international politics as well as the growing role of cities in climate governance. Framing climate change as an emergency, however, can bring difficulties in both the identification of the most appropriate measures to adopt and the effectiveness of those measures in the long run. We use textual analysis to examine the motivations and intended outcomes of 300 declarations endorsed by local governments. The analysis demonstrates that political positioning, previous experience of environmental action within local government, and pressure from civil society are the most common motivations for declaring a climate emergency at the local level. The declarations constitute symbolic gestures highlighting the urgency of the climate challenge, but they do not translate into radically different responses to the climate change challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial: Is There a New Climate Politics?
    Politics and Governance (ISSN: 2183–2463) 2021, Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 1–7 DOI: 10.17645/pag.v9i2.4341 Editorial Editorial: Is There a New Climate Politics? Anna R. Davies 1,*, Vanesa Castán Broto 2 and Stephan Hügel 1 1 Department of Geography, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.R.D.), [email protected] (S.H.) 2 Urban Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 2 April 2021 | Published: 28 April 2021 Abstract Addressing climate change globally requires significant transformations of production and consumption systems. The lan- guage around climate action has shifted tangibly over the last five years to reflect this. Indeed, thousands of local govern- ments, national governments, universities and scientists have declared a climate emergency. Some commentators argue that the emergency framing conveys a new and more appropriate level of urgency needed to respond to climate challenges; to create a social tipping point in the fight against climate change. Others are concerned to move on from such emergency rhetoric to urgent action. Beyond emergency declarations, new spaces of, and places for, engagement with climate change are emerging. The public square, the exhibition hall, the law courts, and the investors’ forum are just some of the arenas where climate change politics are now being negotiated. Emergent governing mechanisms are being utilised, from citi- zens’ assemblies to ecocide lawsuits. New social movements from Extinction Rebellion to Fridays For Future demonstrate heightened concern and willingness to undertake civil disobedience and protest against climate inaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rebellion's Influence on Agenda-Setting and Climate Change
    The Climate Emergency: Extinction Rebellion’s influence on agenda-setting and climate change frames in parliamentary debates in the U.K. Image: TOLGA AKMEN/AFP/Getty Images Hannah van den Hil Student ID: s2094142 Email: [email protected] Supervisor: Dr. L.D. Cabane Master Thesis Crisis and SeCurity Management 29-10-2020 Word count: 18.546 Abstract Evidence of Climate Change has been mounting over the last deCades, but poliCy has been slow to follow. In 2019, the U.K. beCame the first Country in the world to deClare a Climate and eCologiCal emergency. The deClaration Came on the heels of 10 days of protests that disrupted London. The protests were organised by a relatively new social movement named Extinction Rebellion. They managed to mobilise thousands of people for their aCts of Civil disobedience. They stated three demands: 1) a Climate emergency deClaration, 2) legislation for net zero emissions by 2025 and 3) a Citizens’ assembly on Climate Change. This thesis examines to what extent Extinction Rebellion influenced agenda-setting and framing of Climate Change in the House of Commons in the U.K. between January 1st 2018 and May 1st 2019. Media attention and issue salience among U.K. Citizens indiCate that they were effeCtive in increasing both. Although these indiCators do not always translate to agenda-setting, Extinction Rebellion sucCeeded. Before the protests were over, MP Edward Miliband voiCed all three demands in a parliamentary debate that Carried Extinction Rebellion’s name. Several politiCians also attributed Extinction Rebellion and the SChool Strike for Climate protesters with putting Climate Change (baCk) on the agenda.
    [Show full text]