(Dap) Approach to Housing, Employment and Mixed-Use Allocations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Development and Allocations Plan (DAP) APPROACH TO HOUSING, EMPLOYMENT AND MIXED-USE ALLOCATIONS 1.0 NATIONAL POLICY 1.1 The National Planning Policy Framework requires plan making to positively seek opportunities to meet the development needs of their area. For plan- making this means that: “strategic policy-making authorities should have a clear understanding of the land available in their area through the preparation of a strategic housing land availability assessment. From this, planning policies should identify a sufficient supply and mix of sites, taking into account their availability, suitability and likely economic viability” (para. 67). 1.2 Paragraph 20 of the NPPF states that strategic policies should outline a strat- egy for the pattern, scale and quality of development, including sufficient provi- sion for “housing (including affordable housing), employment, retail, leisure and other commercial development”. 1.3 In accordance with the NPPF, local planning authorities should ensure that the Local Plan is based on adequate, up-to-date and relevant evidence about the economic, social and environmental characteristics and prospects of the area. Local planning authorities should ensure that their assessment of land strategies for housing, economic land and other uses are integrated, and that they take full account of relevant market and economic signals. 1.4 A national standardised housing need methodology outlines the calculation of housing need based on published projections data. Housing need should be assessed using the Housing Delivery Test, which examines how the housing requirement compares with the number of new homes delivered over the previous three years. Paragraph 75 of the NPPF outlines that local authorities ‘should prepare an action plan in line with national planning policy’ and set out actions to boost delivery where required. If completions fall below 75% of the figure from 2020 then the presumption in favour of sustainable development will apply. 1.5 The NPPF advocates the efficient and effective use of land, in locations that offer good access to a range of community facilities, key services, economic opportunities and infrastructure. Paragraph 117 emphasises the importance of re-using previously developed land. Land availability assessments identify future land supply which is suitable, available and achievable for housing and economic development uses over the plan period. 1.6 Local authorities should identify small and medium sites (those up to one hectare in size) to accommodate at least 10% of their housing requirement. Paragraph 34 states that expected development contributions should be outlined in plans, including the ‘levels and types of affordable housing required’. Councils should annually identify and update a supply of deliverable sites sufficient to provide 5 years’ worth of housing with an additional buffer of 5% to 1 ensure choice and competition. Where there is a persistent record of under delivery (which is not defined in more detail) an additional 20% buffer is required. Beyond the first 5 years the NPPF requires local authorities to ‘identify specific, developable sites or broad locations for growth, for 6-10 years and, where possible, for years 11-15’. Paragraph 75 together with Annex 1 of the NPPF sets out key requirements of the Housing Delivery Test which will measure the housing delivery which will come into force from November 2018. 1.7 To count towards an authority’s five year supply sites must be considered to be deliverable. The NPPF defines ‘deliverable’ as housing sites that are currently available, offer a suitable location for development now, and are achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years. Additionally, ‘sites with outline planning permission, permission in principle, allocated in the development plan or identified on a brownfield register should only be considered deliverable where there is clear evidence that housing completions will begin on site within five years’. 1.8 Chapter 12 of the NPPF recognises that high quality buildings and places are important aspects of the development process, and paragraph 130 requires local authorities to ‘ensure that the quality of approved development is not materially diminished between permission and completion, as a result of changes being made to the permitted schemes’. To achieve sustainable development, paragraph 124 specifies that ‘being clear about design expectations, and how these will be tested, is essential’. 1.9 In terms of meeting the development needs for employment land, paragraph 80 of the NPPF states that “planning policies and decisions should help create the conditions in which businesses can invest, expand and adapt. Significant weight should be placed on the need to support economic growth and productivity, taking into account both local business needs and wider opportunities for development. The approach taken should allow each area to build on its strengths, counter any weaknesses and address the challenges of the future”. 1.10 The NPPF outlines how planning policies should positively and proactively encourage sustainable growth by setting out a clear economic strategy, accounting for Local Industrial Strategies and other local policies regarding economic development and regeneration. Local planning authorities should accommodate needs not anticipated in the plan and account for new and flexible working practices. Potential barriers to investment should be addressed, such as a poor environment, or inadequate infrastructure, services or housing. Strategic sites should be identified to encourage investment to meet anticipated needs over the plan period. 1.11 Paragraph 82 states that “planning policies and decisions should recognise and address the specific locational requirements of different sectors”, including provision for storage and clusters or networks of knowledge and data-driven, creative or high technology industries. 2.0 NEWCASTLE LOCAL PLAN 2 2.1 The Newcastle Local Plan is made up of 2 parts. The Gateshead and Newcastle Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (CSUCP) (March 2015) contains the strategic policies for the growth of Newcastle and Gateshead (2010-30) and detailed policies in the Urban Core. The Development and Allocations Plan (DAP) is part 2 of the Local Plan in Newcastle and covers the Newcastle Upon Tyne area. Employment 2.2 The adopted CSUCP identifies a need for a minimum of 150 ha of employment land (80 ha in Newcastle), inclusive of 512,000 sq m of office space (410,000 sq m in Newcastle) to come forward in Newcastle and Gateshead over the plan period. 2.3 The CSUCP allocates two Key Employment Areas, Newcastle International Airport and Walker Riverside. The CSUCP also allocates a number of general locations for development within the boundaries of the Urban Core 2.4 The available employment land identified within the locations set out above, while not part of the DAP, will still contribute to the employment land requirement established by the CSUCP. In order to ensure consistency these sites have been subject to the same level of assessment as the other HELAA sites. They will also continue to be assessed regularly within the Council’s ELRs. Housing 2.5 The CSUCP housing target for Newcastle over the Plan period 2010-2030 is 19,000 gross new homes (Policy CS 10) and excludes student accommodation. Set out below (Figures 1 and 2) is the Newcastle upon Tyne housing target and updated trajectory to 2010-30 (based at 01 April 2018). The DAP plans for additional residential capacity of over 4,200 dwellings to add to the CSUCP housing allocation sites (7,380 dwellings 2010-30) and 2,000 dwellings to be delivered in the Urban Core, in order to meet the housing target and objectively assessed need for the city. The sites proposed for allocation in the DAP provide for new dwellings across a range of types and locations seek to provide certainty of supply of housing over the plan period. Figure 1 Newcastle Housing CSUCP Targets (excluding student accommodation) CSUCP Housing Targets 2010-30 Gross Provision 19,000 Forecast losses 2,000 Net Provision 17,000 3 Figure 2 Newcastle Housing Target and Delivery Base date 1 April 2018 2010-30 CSUCP Housing Target (Gross) 19,000 CSUCP Allocations and Urban Core 9,380 CSUCP Allocations (additional dwellings permitted) 373 Completions (2010/11-2017/18) * 5,518 Sites Under Construction (dwellings to be completed) *+ 571 Planning Permissions *+ 454 Allowance for small sites (<5 units)(50 x12 p.a.) 600 Residual 2,104 Proposed Additional Housing Allocations 4,212 *Excluding sites in CSUCP and DAP Allocations and Urban Core to avoid double counting +Excluding small sites to avoid double counting. 2.6 Figure 2 above clarifies the residual objectively assessed needs by subtracting completions (5,912 minus sites CSUCP Allocations and Urban Core); sites currently under construction; remaining allocations (excluding sites in CSUCP, DAP Allocations, Urban Core and allowance for small sites to avoid double counting) from the gross target. The number of additional dwellings with planning permission was 474 units at 1 April 2018 from which 20 units have been deducted (deriving 454 units) at a 10% discount rate for sites in Low/ Low Mid residential value areas, so as to accord with the methodology utilized in the Core Strategy (SHLAA, 2013). 2.7 The DAP allocations (Policy DM5) provides a capacity of 4,200 units and an additional 100% buffer (over the residual requirement) thus allowing for choice in the market and delays to delivery. Even if the forecast need for bedspaces in residential care homes (under use class C2 of the Use Classes Order) is not delivered (and 53% of the forecast need for bedspces have been delivered since 2015/16), this would only increase the requirement to 2,615 dwellings (total of 511 dwellings) which is below the assumed capacity of the allocated DAP sites. 2.8 The joint Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) (August 2017) was commissioned to inform policy making in relation to housing needs.
Recommended publications
  • Newcastle City Council and Gateshead Council Green Infrastructure Study - Evidence Base

    Newcastle City Council and Gateshead Council Green Infrastructure Study - Evidence Base

    Newcastle City Council and Gateshead Council Green Infrastructure Study - Evidence Base Final Report January 2011 Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by Entec (© Entec UK Limited 2011) save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by Entec under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Entec. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third-party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by Entec at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third-party who is able to access it by any means. Entec excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report. We do not however exclude our liability (if any) for personal injury or death resulting from our negligence, for fraud or any other matter in relation to which we cannot legally exclude liability.
  • 2001 Census Topic Report: Housing

    2001 Census Topic Report: Housing

    2001-BASED CENSUS TOPIC REPORT HOUSING MARCH 2005 By Carol Burdis Peter Sturman Kadhem Jallab Reference: CP04/3 Price: £30.00 TYNE & WEAR RESEARCH AND INFORMATION 1st Floor Provincial House Northumberland Street Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7DQ (0191) 277 1919 Supported jointly by the Cities of Newcastle and Sunderland and the Metropolitan Boroughs of Gateshead, North Tyneside and South Tyneside Housing Tyne & Wear Research and Information Housing CONTENTS 1. Key Points……… ………….………………………………………………………………….. 1 2. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….…..…. 3 3. Housing Characteristics……………………………………………………………….….... 5 3.1 Dwelling Stock ……………………………………………………………………….….. 5 3.2 Vacant Dwellings……………………………………………………….………….…...... 6 3.3 Housing Tenure…………………………………………………………………….…….. 7 4. Housing Conditions…………………………………………………………………..…..…. 9 4.1 Housing Amenities…………………………………………………………………......… 9 4.2 Housing Stress……………………………………………………………………….….... 11 5. Housing Provision for Selected Household Types…………………………………….. 13 5.1 Household Type by Housing Tenure…………………………………………………..…. 13 5.2 Pensioner Households ……………………………………………………………………. 14 5.3 Households with Dependent Children………………...………………………………….. 17 5.4 Ethnic Groups…………………………………………………………………………..… 20 6. Variations within Tyne & Wear…………………………………………………………….. 22 6.1 Key Statistics for Tyne & Wear Districts ………………………………………………… 22 6.2 Dwelling Type …………………………………………………………………………..... 23 6.3 Household Tenure ………………………………………………………………………… 23 6.4 Housing Amenities ……………………………………………………………………….. 23 7. Ward-Level
  • Local Election Results 2008

    Local Election Results 2008

    Local Election Results 1st May 2008 Tyne and Wear Andrew Teale Version 0.02 April 29, 2009 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2008 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2009. The author grants permission to copy and distribute this work in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. This file (in several formats) is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Chapter 7 Tyne and Wear 7.1 Gateshead Birtley Deckham Kathy King Lib 1,053 Brian Coates Lab 1,029 Tom Collins Lab 1,003 Lisa Bradley LD 456 Josephine Walker C 273 Allan Davidson C 349 Kevin Scott BNP 297 Blaydon Stephen Ronchetti Lab 1,211 Dunston and Teams David Osborne LD 869 David Bollands Lab 971 Paul Duggan C 272 Michael Ruddy LD 309 Kelly Mares BNP 257 Margaret Bell C 243 Bridges Paul Harper Ind 34 John Eagle Lab 840 Philip Allen LD 317 Val Bond C 232 Dunston Hill and Whickham East Keith McFarlane BNP 222 Peter Maughan LD 1,402 Jennifer Peace Lab 806 Chopwell and Rowlands Gill John Callanan C 351 Kevin Berry Ind 260 John Hamilton Lab 1,547 Raymond Callender LD 720 Lynda Duggan C 443 Felling Chowdene David Napier Lab 1,128 Dorothy Ruddy LD 287 John McElroy Lab 1,403 Trevor Murray C 219 Daniel Duggan C 593 Edward McFarlane BNP 210 Glenys Goodwill LD 354 Terrence Jopling BNP 243 Ind John Crozier 129 High Fell Jean Lee Lab 992 Crawcrook and Greenside Ann McCarthy LD 275 Noel Rippeth LD 1,405 Maureen Moor C 225 Helen Hughes Lab 948 Ronald Fairlamb BNP 221 Leonard Davidson C 264 Andrew Marshall Ind 104 60 7.1.
  • Newcastle Upon Tyne Local Authority

    Or Oral Health Profile: Newcastle upon Tyne local authority al h ealth Newcastle upon Tyne Published March 2021 Oral health of 5-year-old children p This profile describes the oral health of 5-year- rofile olds living in Newcastle upon Tyne. It uses data from the National Dental Epidemiology Programme 2019 survey of 5-year-old children1. The profile is designed to help local government and health services improve the oral health and wellbeing of children and tackle health inequalities. In Newcastle upon Tyne 523 5-year-olds (approximately 47.8% of those sampled) were examined at school by trained and calibrated examiners using the national standard method2. Figure 1: Prevalence of experience of dental decay and mean number of teeth with experience of dental decay in 5-year-olds in Newcastle upon Tyne, other local authorities in the North East and England. 2.0 Average filled teeth 45 1.8 Average missing (due to decay) teeth 40 Average decayed teeth 1.6 % with decay experience 35 1.4 30 1.2 25 1.0 20 0.8 15 0.6 Meannumber of teeth 0.4 10 0.2 5 0.0 0 Prevalence Prevalence of experience ofdecay dental (%) Darlington Hartlepool ENGLAND Gateshead Sunderland NORTH EAST Middlesbrough North Tyneside North South Tyneside South Northumberland County Durham County Stockton-on-Tees Area Tyne uponNewcastle Redcar Cleveland and 1 Oral Health Profile: Newcastle upon Tyne local authority Table 1: Experience of dental decay in 5-year-olds in Newcastle upon Tyne, other local authorities in the North East and England. Mean number of teeth Mean number of
  • Engineering Modelling of Building Energy Consumption in Cities: Identifying Key Variables and Their Interactions with the Built Environment

    Engineering Modelling of Building Energy Consumption in Cities: Identifying Key Variables and Their Interactions with the Built Environment

    Engineering modelling of building energy consumption in cities: Identifying key variables and their interactions with the built environment Javier Urquizo1;3, Carlos Calder´on1, and Philip James2 1 School of Architecture Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE1 7RU 2 School of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE1 7RU 3 Escuela Superior Polit´ecnicadel Litoral, ESPOL, FIEC, Campus Gustavo Galindo Km. 30.5 V´ıaPerimetral, P.O. Box 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador [email protected] http://www.espol.edu.ec fcarlos.calderon,[email protected] https://www.ncl.ac.uk Abstract. This paper focuses on a spatial domestic energy framework of sub-city areas in the United Kingdom using Newcastle upon Tyne as a case study. The framework estimates the energy end-use at the single dwelling level on three aggregate scales: district, neigh- bourhood and community. The framework uses two aggregation approaches, one using an approximated prototype-cluster of similar dwellings at the district scale and the other using a novel, sub-city DEM modelling of building and its micro-cohesive energy structures in neighbourhoods and communities. The validation strategy compare the modelled gas and electricity values in three representative districts against the DECC values in two aggregate hierarchical areas for electricity and gas: the DECC Medium Layer Super Output Area (ML- SOA), and the Lower Layer Super Output Area (LLSOA). Our work discusses this framework in key areas: the availability of data, the number of surveyed variables and data processing methods for filling blanks in order to have an individual dwelling's complete energy Stan- dard Assessment Procedure (SAP) profile, methods to provide evidence for finding patterns residing in the data set, methods for estimating the annual composite (gas and electricity) energy consumption for individual and aggregated dwellings, the validation strategy, the uncertainties associated in the data and model, and scaling and replication in other cities.
  • Boundary Commission for England Fifth Periodical Report Cm 7032

    Boundary Commission for England Fifth Periodical Report Cm 7032

    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Fifth Periodical Report Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3(5) of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986 Volume 2 Appendices Cm 7032 £120.00 Four Volumes. London: The Stationery Office Not to be sold separately © Crown Copyright 2007 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Chapter One Introduction Chapter Two General Principles Chapter Three The London Boroughs Chapter Four The Metropolitan Counties Chapter Five The Non-Metropolitan Counties Chapter Six Conclusions VOLUME 2 Page Appendices A Rules for redistribution of seats 1 B List of statutory instruments 3 C Schedule of recommendations 24 D Meeting with parliamentary political parties 137 E Newsletters 149 F Existing constituencies – the number of parliamentary electors in 2000 and 2006 155 G Recommended constituencies:- i) in alphabetical order with parliamentary electors in 2000 and 2006 170 ii) in descending order of parliamentary electors in 2000 and 2006 183 H The numbers of parliamentary electors, the theoretical entitlements,
  • Modelling the Spatial Energy Diversity in Sub-City Areas Using Remote Sensors

    Modelling the Spatial Energy Diversity in Sub-City Areas Using Remote Sensors

    International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 22 2019 61–80 Modelling the spatial energy diversity in sub-city areas using remote sensors Javier Urquizoac* , Carlos Calderóna, and Philip Jamesb a School of Architecture Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University, The Quadrangle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom b School of Engineering, Newcastle University, 1 Science Square, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TG, United Kingdom c Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, FIEC, Campus Gustavo Galindo Km. 30.5 Vía Perimetral, P.O. Box 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador ABSTRACT Keywords: This research paper aims first to present in a digital map a class information about surface Energy use; temperature in domestic buildings by means of thermal imagery. The classes are relative to the Microclimates; particular temperature distribution and for the particular night of the survey. Classification assigns Surface temperature; every pixel into one of five classes based on where the pixel falls in the histogram, into an integer Thermal images; between 1 and 5, with 1 representing being the “coolest” pixels and 5 being the “hottest” Urban energy modelling. resolution, based on a case study acquired over Newcastle upon Tyne (United Kingdom). The ultimate aim is combine this information with building level data set for Newcastle and adds on the energy modelling aspect through linking with the English House Survey (EHS) as input to the Cambridge Housing Model (CHM). This provides the means to produce building level energy use URL: estimates and surface temperature, which in turn can be analysed both spatially and aspatially. http://dx.doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.3324 This building level approach provides the potential for energy planners and other bodies to model energy interventions measures with flexibility in scale and to potentially adapt plans to the spatial variability of the local area characteristics.
  • The North East Region … a Green History

    The North East Region … a Green History

    The North East Region … A Green History he green movement in the North East in general and Tyneside in particular scarcely appears in standard histories of the area nor is it any the more visible Tin feature films and TV programmes set here. Yet it has existed for many years, albeit much weaker than in other parts of the country. Indeed one of the first mass movements with a strong environmental element was the local ‘Dicky Bird Society’ founded in 1874. Membership reached some 100,000.1 Certain individuals from the area had also pre-echoed certain green concerns. For example, the Newcastle-born radical Thomas Spence (1750-1814), was a pio- neer of the concept of ‘human rights’. In 1771, the proposed enclosure of the Town Moor drove him to develop plans for community land ownership as part of his critique of aristocratic privilege and landlordism. He also advocated a kind of socially guar- anteed income for the unemployed. So he might be considered a pre-echo of cer- tain green ideas, especially land value tax and the basic income scheme as well as broader notions of ‘social justice’. However the main platform for environmental concern has traditionally been rather ‘respectable’ organisations. First in the field was the Natural History Society of Nor- thumberland, Durham and Newcastle upon Tyne (now the Natural History Society of Northumbria) It began life in 1829 with a membership of 134. Local ornithologist John Hancock (1808-1890) led the campaign to create the Museum of Natural Mu- seum which officially opened in 1884 and for many years bore his name.
  • Capturing Spatial Effects, Technology Interactions, and Uncertainty In

    Capturing Spatial Effects, Technology Interactions, and Uncertainty In

    Capturing spatial effects, technology interactions, and uncertainty in urban energy and carbon models: retrofitting Newcastle as a case-study James Keirsteada,∗, Carlos Calderonb aDept of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, UK, SW7 2AZ bSchool of Architecture Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE1 7RU Abstract Local authorities often rely upon urban energy and carbon modelling tools to develop mitigation policies and strategies that will deliver reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper the UK example of Newcastle-upon- Tyne is used to critique current practice, noting that important features of urban energy systems are often omitted by bottom-up tools including interactions between technologies, spatial disaggregation of demand, and the ability to pursue over-arching policy goals like cost minimization. An alternative optimization-based approach is then described and applied to the Newcastle case, at the scale of both the whole city and the South Heaton district, and using Monte Carlo techniques to address policy uncertainty. The results show that this new method can help policy makers draw more robust policy conclusions, sensitive to spatial variations in energy demand and capturing the interactions between developments in the national energy system and local policy options. Further work should focus on improving our understanding of local building stocks and energy demands so as to better assess the potential of new technologies and policies. ∗Corresponding author. Tel: +44 (0)207 594 6010. Email addresses: [email protected] (James Keirstead), [email protected] (Carlos Calderon) Preprint submitted to Energy Policy March 23, 2012 Key words: urban energy systems, optimization, retrofit 1.
  • Network Management Plan

    Network Management Plan

    Network Management Plan Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Future challenges ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Best Use of our Transport Networks....................................................................................... 2 2.2 Population growth and congestion ......................................................................................... 2 2.3 Climate Change ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 3. An Introduction to Newcastle’s Highway Network ......................................................................... 4 3.1 The City of Newcastle ............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Road, Rail and Air .................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Newcastle in the future .......................................................................................................... 4 4. The Legal Framework ...................................................................................................................... 5
  • A Framework for Delivering Energy Efficiency and Decentralised Energy Generation Projects to Tackle Fuel Poverty and Co2 Emissions in Cities

    A Framework for Delivering Energy Efficiency and Decentralised Energy Generation Projects to Tackle Fuel Poverty and Co2 Emissions in Cities

    2020 Building Performance Analysis Conference and SimBuild co-organized by ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA A FRAMEWORK FOR DELIVERING ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DECENTRALISED ENERGY GENERATION PROJECTS TO TACKLE FUEL POVERTY AND CO2 EMISSIONS IN CITIES Javier Urquizo1,2, Carlos Calderón2, and Philip James2 1Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Guayaquil, Ecuador 2Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK This paper focuses on a hitherto unexplored research ABSTRACT question, for which at present there is no definitive UK government is providing part-funding for answer, regarding the need for a systematic framework organisations to commission external feasibility studies. to estimate the realistic energy consumption, carbon This is reflected in government strategy and funding emission and poverty of housing stock at sub-city levels, toward a low carbon, smart, local energy system. Such from each building to a neighbourhood until the city. studies would provide detailed advice on technical and This information can be used by local governments to economic feasibility and assist in developing a technical identify areas for future intervention, and thus enhance specification. Local energy system projects vary wildly the effectiveness of energy efficiency and carbon saving in scale, from a single building to districts and the whole measures, especially to the poor. city. However, the building stock in a city is distributed over the territory, and some of the building types are A FRAMEWORK FOR ENERGY, CARBON present only at specific sites. Therefore, domestic energy AND POVERTY and carbon models need tools to determine their spatial The concept of ‘fuel poverty’, the inability to afford dimension and these may be provided by spatial adequate warmth at home has become a focus for social components.