DOCSLIB.ORG

Boundary Commission for England Fifth Periodical Report Cm 7032

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boundary Commission for England Fifth Periodical Report Cm 7032 BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Fifth Periodical Report Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3(5) of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986 Volume 2 Appendices Cm 7032 £120.00 Four Volumes. London: The Stationery Office Not to be sold separately © Crown Copyright 2007 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Chapter One Introduction Chapter Two General Principles Chapter Three The London Boroughs Chapter Four The Metropolitan Counties Chapter Five The Non-Metropolitan Counties Chapter Six Conclusions VOLUME 2 Page Appendices A Rules for redistribution of seats 1 B List of statutory instruments 3 C Schedule of recommendations 24 D Meeting with parliamentary political parties 137 E Newsletters 149 F Existing constituencies – the number of parliamentary electors in 2000 and 2006 155 G Recommended constituencies:- i) in alphabetical order with parliamentary electors in 2000 and 2006 170 ii) in descending order of parliamentary electors in 2000 and 2006 183 H The numbers of parliamentary electors, the theoretical entitlements, and county and borough averages in 2000 and 2006 196 I Local inquiries held during the general review 214 J Dates on which the provisional and revised recommendations were published 220 K The Commission’s Secretariat 228 L Glossary of terms 229 Index of recommended constituencies 231 VOLUME 3 Maps of the existing and recommended constituencies in the London Boroughs and the Metropolitan Counties VOLUME 4 Maps of the existing and recommended constituencies in the the Non-Metropolitan Counties and Unitary Authorities i APPENDIX A RULES FOR REDISTRIBUTION OF SEATS (Schedule 2 to the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986) The Rules 1. (1) The number of constituencies in Great Britain shall not be substantially greater or less than 613. (2) – repealed by the Scotland Act 1988. (3) The number of constituencies in Wales shall not be less than 35. (4) The number of constituencies in Northern Ireland shall not be greater than 18 or less than 16, and shall be 17 unless it appears to the Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland that Northern Ireland should for the time being be divided into 16 or (as the case may be) into 18 constituencies. 2. Every constituency shall return a single member. 3. There shall continue to be a constituency which shall include the whole of the City of London and the name of which shall refer to the City of London. 3A. A constituency which includes the Orkney Islands or the Shetland Islands shall not include the whole or any part of a local government area other than the Orkney Islands and the Shetland Islands. 4. (1) So far as is practicable having regard to rules 1 to 3A- (a) in England and Wales,- (i) no county or any part of a county shall be included in a constituency which includes the whole or part of any other county or the whole or part of a London borough, (ii) no London borough or any part of a London borough shall be included in a constituency which includes the whole or part of any other London borough, (b) in Scotland, regard shall be had to the boundaries of local authority areas, (c) in Northern Ireland, no ward shall be included partly in one constituency and partly in another. 1 (1A) In sub-paragraph (1)(a) above “county” means in relation to Wales, a preserved county (as defined by section 64 of the Local Government (Wales) Act 1994). (2) In sub-paragraph (1)(b) above "area” and "local authority" have the same meanings as in the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. 5. The electorate of any constituency shall be as near the electoral quota as is practicable having regard to rules 1 to 4; and a Boundary Commission may depart from the strict application of rule 4 if it appears to them that a departure is desirable to avoid an excessive disparity between the electorate of any constituency and the electoral quota, or between the electorate of any constituency and that of neighbouring constituencies in the part of the United Kingdom with which they are concerned. 6. A Boundary Commission may depart from the strict application of rules 4 and 5 if special geographical considerations, including in particular the size, shape and accessibility of a constituency, appear to them to render departure desirable. General and supplementary 7. It shall not be the duty of a Boundary Commission to aim at giving full effect in all circumstances to the above rules (except rule 3A) but they shall take account, so far as they reasonably can- (a) of the inconveniences attendant on alterations of constituencies other than alterations made for the purposes of rule 4, and (b) of any local ties which would be broken by such alterations. 8. In the application of rule 5 to each part of the United Kingdom for which there is a Boundary Commission - (a) the expression “electoral quota” means a number obtained by dividing the electorate for that part of the United Kingdom by the number of constituencies in it existing on the enumeration date, (b) the expression “electorate” means- (i) in relation to a constituency, the number of persons whose names appear on the register of parliamentary electors in force on the enumeration date under the Representation of the People Acts for the constituency, (ii) in relation to the part of the United Kingdom, the aggregate electorate as defined in sub-paragraph (i) above of all the constituencies in that part (c) the expression “enumeration date” means, in relation to any report of a Boundary Commission under this Act, the date on which the notice with respect to that report is published in accordance with section 5(1) of this Act. 9. In this Schedule, a reference to a rule followed by a number is a reference to the rule set out in the correspondingly numbered paragraph of this Schedule. 2 APPENDIX B LIST OF STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS Part One Order in Council following the recommendations of the Commission in the fourth periodical report submitted on 12 April 1995. S.I. 1995 No.1626 The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 1995 Part Two Orders in Council following the recommendations of the Commission in reports submitted in June 1996 (House of Commons Paper 438) and November 1998 (House of Commons Paper 1087). S.I. 1996 No.1922 The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) (Miscellaneous Changes) Order 1996 Birmingham, Edgbaston Birmingham, Northfield Birmingham, Selly Oak Bromsgrove Chingford and Woodford Green Epping Forest Ilford North Leyton and Wanstead Walthamstow S.I. 1998 No.3152 The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) (Miscellaneous Changes) Order 1998 Beaconsfield Carshalton and Wallington Croydon North Ealing, Acton and Shepherd’s Bush Epsom and Ewell Esher and Walton Hammersmith and Fulham Kensington and Chelsea Kingston and Surbiton Mitcham and Morden Mole Valley Regent’s Park and Kensington North Runnymede and Weybridge 3 S.I. 1998 No.3152 The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) (Miscellaneous Changes) (continued) Order 1998 Spelthorne Sutton and Cheam Windsor Part Three The following Orders are those that created the new district wards (electoral divisions in the Isle of Wight) and those that created the new unitary authorities (which have county status) have also been identified. They have been taken into account in the recommendations for new Parliamentary constituencies contained in the report. THE LONDON BOROUGHS Barking and Dagenham The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Barnet The London Borough of Barnet (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Bexley The London Borough of Bexley (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Brent The London Borough of Brent (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Bromley The London Borough of Bromley (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Camden The London Borough of Camden (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Croydon The London Borough of Croydon (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Ealing The London Borough of Ealing (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 4 Enfield The London Borough of Enfield (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Greenwich The London Borough of Greenwich (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Hackney The London Borough of Hackney (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Hammersmith and Fulham The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Haringey The London Borough of Haringey (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Harrow The London Borough of Harrow (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Havering The London Borough of Havering (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Hillingdon The London Borough of Hillingdon (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Hounslow The London Borough of Hounslow (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Islington The London Borough of Islington (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Kensington and Chelsea The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Kingston upon Thames The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 5 Lambeth The London Borough of Lambeth (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Lewisham The London Borough of Lewisham (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Merton The London Borough of Merton (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Newham The London Borough of Newham
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Memories of a Lifetime in Berkhamsted
    Your Berkhamsted editorial From the Editor July 2012 The Parish Magazine of Contents St Peter's Great Berkhamsted Leader by Richard Hackworth 3 Welcome to the July issue of Your Around the town 5 Berkhamsted. Read all about us 7 The weather may still not be what we’d like for summer but in true British spirit it Back to the outdoors 9 doesn’t stop us celebrating. The jubilee weekend may have had us all reaching for The Black Ditch, the dungeon the umbrellas but the cloud did break at and the parachute 12 times for the High Street party and it was a beautiful evening for the celebrations later Sport—cricket 14 at Ashlyns School and the many street parties around town. At Ashlyns it was Christians against poverty 15 encouraging to see so many people come together from the community, picnic Hospice News 16 blankets in tow, just relaxing, chatting and enjoying being part of such a lovely town. Parish news 18 On the subject of celebrations, the Berkhamsted Games 2012 take place this Summer garden 20 month on 5th July, not forgetting of course the 2012 Olympics, and our own magazine Memories of a lifetime in is 140 years old! So, more reasons to keep Berkhamsted 23 that union jack bunting flying and carry on regardless of the great British weather. Chilterns Dog Rescue 27 To celebrate our anniversary we have two Recipe 28 articles by Dan Parry: one looking back at Berkhamsted in 1872 and another where The Last Word 31 he chats to a long-term Berkhamsted resident Joan Pheby, born in 1924, about front cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Nottingham Retail Study For
    Appendix 1 Greater Nottingham Retail Study For Nottingham City Council Nottinghamshire County Council Broxtowe Borough Council Gedling Borough Council Rushcliffe Borough Council Prepared by DTZ 48 Warwick Street London W1B 5NL Tel: 020-7534-5064 Job No. 133957 January 2008 1. Summary of Principal Findings and Conclusions 1 This Retail Study was commissioned by the five Local Authorities to advise on the need for new retail development in the sub-region, and how it could be accommodated in a commercially realistic way. It was also intended to identify the hierarchy of centres in the Districts; and provide information on the vitality and viability of each town centre, applying the criteria in PPS6. The Study will form part of the evidence base for each new Local Development Framework. National trends in retailing and retail development 2 As the context for retail planning and development, a review of national trends in retailing and retail development was undertaken. The principal implications of these trends for Greater Nottingham are as follows: (a) To achieve new retail development in the smaller centres, it will be necessary to encourage non-traditional forms of development. These will either need to be mixed use schemes, probably including substantial residential elements so as to increase value and subsidise the ground floor retail accommodation, or be low cost developments such as simple free-standing stores. (b) Despite PPS6 and the sequential approach, there will be continued pressure for more out-of-centre development of retail warehouses; and pressure to relax bulky goods conditions on existing retail warehouses in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Funtley Parish Council: How a Community Governance Review Was Triggered in Funtley, Hampshire
    Funtley Parish Council: How a Community Governance Review Was Triggered in Funtley, Hampshire Page 1 of 9 Headlines: The village of Funtley is in the Borough of Fareham, in the county of Hampshire. Funtley Village Society triggered a Community Governance Review in Fareham Borough by collecting signatures for their residents on a petition and submitting it to the Borough Council. The Borough Council were initially unaware of the legal changes relating to a Community Governance Review (the process by which a new parish council is created) which caused tension between the Village Society and Fareham Borough Council. On 24th May 2016 the campaign group was informed that Fareham Borough Council may reject their request to create a parish council in Funtley, recommending that the status quo should be maintained. The Borough Council did finally reject the creation of a new Funtley Parish Council on 28 July, 2016 citing the creation of an additional burden to residents of an uncapped precept as the main reason. This is a study revealing the difficulty in persuading principal authority councillors that a new parish council will be beneficial for residents when such councillors may feel that their traditional mandate will be undermined by such a new governance model in an area unused to creating new parish councils. It also reveals that the Community Governance Review process needs to be changed again to ensure that mandatory resident referenda are introduced the outcomes of which are binding. Why A Council Is Wanted: Having gathered over 300 signatures, the Funtley Village Society submitted its petition to Fareham Borough Council triggering a Community Governance Review (the process by which it hoped the Borough Council will ultimately agree to the creation of a new parish council in Funtley).
    [Show full text]
  • Borough of Bedford Local Access Forum
    Borough of Bedford Local Access Forum Minutes of meeting held on 17th January 2012 at Committee Room 2, Borough Hall commencing at 6.30pm Members Observers Bob Wallace - Chairman Phill Fox – Bedford Borough Council James Russell – Vice Chairman Simon Fisher – Bedford Borough Council David Mitchell Lizzie Barnicoat – Secretary Nigel Jacobs Apologies Barry Ingram Graham Watson Steve Bunstead David Binns Sarah Hollands Andy Gerrard Mark Egar 1. Welcome by Chairman Bob Wallace welcomed everyone to the meeting, thanking everyone for attending following the rearrangement. 2. Public Questions There were no public questions received, as no members of the public present. 3. Correspondence Received The Secretary detailed the correspondence received between meetings; a number of items had been received from the Eastern Region LAF Coordinator including an invite to the Natural England LAF Conference which the Chairman would be attending. There had also been information regarding Access for all training, Minerals and Waste consultation document, and Huddle training information which would be detailed further during the meeting. There was also correspondence regarding LAF representation on Local Nature Partnerships which also would be discussed during the meeting. Page 1 It was raised if the BoBLAF had received any information on funding for community paths, and discussions around promoting partnership work, it was noted that at present nothing had been received, however, the Secretary to circulate any information if received. The Forum Secretary had made an application to Project Involve which had been denied, those present then discussed how best to ensure information is shared and accessible to the public. It was agreed that in the interim period remaining with the Borough Council website as the access point to be continued with.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Borough of Ashford Prow
    ‘Honey Hill’ and the field boundary where the path no longer follows PROW - IN THE BOROUGH OF ASHFORD the stream, for a distance of 1km. Notice of the makiNg of aN order to temporarily close There is no alternative route. public footpath AU67 iN ashford For detailed enquiries please contact Andrew Hutchinson Contact In the borough of ashford Centre no. 03000 417171 keNt couNty couNcil Or for further details on temporary closures on the Rights of Way Network see: www.kent.gov.uk/prowclosures (public footpath AU67) (prohibitioN of traffic) temporary order 2017 PROW - IN THE BOROUGH OF SWALE Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, Section 14(1), As Amended By The Road Traffic (Temporary Restrictions) Act 1991 Notice of the makiNg of aN order to temporarily close kent county council has made an order the effect of which is to restricted byWays ZSX47, ZSX48 aNd ZSX90 iN the town of temporarily close public footpath AU67, between its junction with sheerNess public footpath AU66 and tQ 9939 4386 from the 13th November In the borough of Swale 2017. keNt couNty couNcil The path will be closed for a maximum of six months, although it is expected that it will reopen before the end of December 2017. (restricted byWays ZSX47, ZSX48 aNd ZSX90) (prohibitioN of traffic) temporary order 2017 The path is closed because works are planned on or near it. Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, Section 14(1), As Amended By The The alternative route is via the tarmac track through Lodge Wood and Road Traffic (Temporary Restrictions) Act 1991 will be signed for the duration of the closure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fareham and Gosport Primary Care Trust (Establishment) Order 2002
    DOH700567-0001 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. l120 NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE, ENGLAND The Fareham and Gosport Primary Care Trust (Establishment) Order 2002 Made - 25th March 2002 Coming into force 1st April 2002 The Secretary of State for Health, in the exercise of the powers conferred on him by sections 16A(1), (2) and (3) and 126(4) of, and paragraph 1 of Schedule 5A to, the National Health Service Act 1977(a) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, following compliance with the consultation requirements contained in regulations made under section 16A(5) of the Act(b), hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.--(1) This Order may be cited as the Fareham and Gosport Primary Care Trust (Establishment) Order 2002 and shall come into force on 1st April 2002. (2) In this Order, unless the context otherwise requires-- "operational date" is to be construed in accordance with paragraph 1 (2) of Schedule 5A to the National Health Service Act 1977; "the trust" means the Fareham and Gosport Primary Care Trust established by article 2 of this Order. Establishment, operational date and name of the Primary Care Trust 2. -(1) There is hereby established with effect from l st April 2002 a Primary Care Trust to be called the Fareham and Gosport Primary Care Trust. (2) The operational date of the trust shall be 1st April 2002. Area of the trust 3. The trust shall be established for the area specified in the Schedule to this Order. (a) 1977 cA9; section 16A was inserted by the Health Act 1999 (c.8) ("the 1999 Act"), section 2(1); section 126(4) was amended by the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 (c.19) ("the 1990 Act"), section 65(2) and by the 1999 Act, Schedule 4, paragraph 37(6); Schedule 5A was inserted by the 1999 Act, Schedule 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review Borough of Gravesham/Borough of Dartford/District of Sevenoaks LOCAL GOVEHNICWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HEK)hT NO. LOCAL GOVKRflUEJlT BOI'NJJAHY COMMISSION FOR CHAIRMAN Mr C J Ellerton CMC MB1C Mr J U Powell PRICE FGV* Lady Aoknur lir T Brockbank DI^ Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Me B Qcholee QBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1. At present the New Barn residential area is split between Dartford Borough, Sevenoaks District and Gravesham Borough; the part situated in Dartford is in the parish of ^outhfleet; the part in Sevenoaks is in the parish of Longfield, whilst the part in Gravesham is unparished. On 30 November 1979» Gravesham Borough Council requested ue to review the boundaries between the districts of Gravesham, Dartford and Sevenoaks in the vicinity of New Barn. Their request was in response to representations from the New Barn Ratepayers Association for the whole of the New Barn residential area to be incorporated within Gravesham Borough. The Association based their representations on a survey of opinion which they carried out in 1978 among the residents of New Barn on the question of whether the area should be under one authority, and if so, which one. The results indicated that a majority (8?#) of residents indicating a view preferred to see New Barn under one authority and a large proportion (6990 of these considered that this should be Gravesham. 2. We noted that Kent County Council, Dartford Borough Council, Sevenoaks District Council, and Longfield Parish Council were all opposed to a review beinp undertaken at that time, although Kent County Council and Dartford BOrough Council did a^ree that the current boundaries in the New Barn area were not wholly satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B KENT YOUTH SERVICE
    Appendix B KENT YOUTH SERVICE: NEEDS ANALYSIS AND OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMMISSIONING OF YOUTH WORK PROVISION IN KENT 1. Introduction 1.1 The publication ‘Bold Steps for Kent’ outlines the medium term plan for Kent County Council for the next four years; one of its three aims is to ‘put the citizen in control’: “power and influence must be in the hands of local people and local communities so they are more able to take responsibility for their own community and service needs, such as creating new social enterprise”. In line with this aim, Kent Youth Service is seeking to commission a range of providers to deliver youth work within local communities. This document lays out the intended outcomes for young people and the communities in which they live as a result of this commissioning process. 2. Service Context 2.1 The Education and Inspections Act 2006 (Section 6) places a duty on local authorities to provide for young people aged 13-19 (and up to 24 for those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities) sufficient recreational and educational leisure time activities and facilities for the improvement of young people’s well-being and their personal and social development. 2.2 The focus on the ages 13-19 reflects the fact that these ages are commonly understood to represent a transition period for young people during which the engagement in positive leisure time activities as described in the Education and Inspection Act 2006 can offer significant benefits to young people. The statutory guidance for this duty states that local authorities should be clear that they are able to secure access to positive activities in order to accommodate individuals with early or delayed transitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Calverton, Lambley and Woodborough Area (Revised)) (Weight Restriction) Traffic Regulation Order 2020 (7222)
    THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 The Nottinghamshire County Council (Calverton, Lambley and Woodborough Area (Revised)) (Weight Restriction) Traffic Regulation Order 2020 (7222) The NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ("the Council") in exercise of its powers under Sections 1(1) and (2), 2(4) and 3(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("the Act") and of all other enabling powers and with the consent of the Secretary of State under Part II of Schedule 9 and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of that Schedule to the Act hereby makes the following Order:- 1. Save as provided in Article 2 of this Order, no heavy commercial vehicle shall, except upon the direction or with the permission of a Police Constable in uniform, to proceed in any of the roads specified in Schedule 1 to this Order. 2. Nothing in Article 1 of this Order shall make it unlawful for a heavy commercial vehicle to proceed in the roads specified in Schedule 1 to this Order if the vehicle is being used:- (1) for or in connection with the conveyance of goods to or from premises situated on or adjacent to that length of road; (2) for the purpose of agriculture on any land adjacent to that length of road or for or in connection with the conveyance or haulage of timber felled upon such land; (3) in connection with the carrying out on, or on the premises situated on or adjacent to, that length of road of any of the following operations, namely– (i) building, industrial or demolition operations; (ii)
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Site Allocations & Development Management Plan
    Braintree District Council Draft Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Plan Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report – Non Technical Summary January 2013 Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary January 2013 Place Services at Essex County Council Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary January 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and Methodology ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Draft Site Allocations and Development Management Plan ........................................ 1 1.3 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment .................................... 1 1.4 Progress to Date ................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Methodology........................................................................................................................ 3 1.6 The Aim and Structure of this Report .................................................................................. 3 2 Sustainability Context, Baseline and Objectives.............................................................. 4 2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Plans & Programmes .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 Appendices
    APPENDICES Footnotes I Chronology of Evolving Architecture/Design II List of Consultees III Principal Issues Raised by Consultations IV Principal Contacts V Summary List of Strategic Policies VI List of Illustrations VII APPENDIX I: FOOTNOTES 1 London Planning Advisory Committee : 1993 Draft Advice on Strategic Planning Guidance for London (para. 8.14) 2 Royal Fine Art Commission: Thames Connections Exhibition (May 1991) 3 Judy Hillman: A New Look for London (Royal Fine Art Commission 1988) ISBN 0 11 752135 3 4 Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Landscape Strategy for the Thames between Hampton Court and Kew: Elements for the Project Brief (July 1992) Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Report on Consultation (July 1992) 5 Sherban Cantacuzino Eddington Charitable Trust Johnny Van Haeften Mick Jagger Richard Lester Prince and Princess Rupert Loewenstein 6 David Lowenthal: The Historic Landscape Reconsidered (George Washington Univ. 1990) 7 English Nature: Strategy for the 1990s: Natural Areas (1993) 8 Richmond Council demolition of Devonshire Lodge at the foot of Richmond Hill in 1960s 9 Countryside Commission, English Heritage, English Nature: Conservation Issues in Strategic Plans (August 1993) ISBN 0 86170 383 9 10 Greater London Council, Department of Transportation and Development: Thames-side Guidelines, An Environmental Handbook for London’s River (March 1986) 11 London Ecology Unit A Nature Conservation Strategy for London (Ecology Handbook 4) Nature Conservation in Hounslow (Ecology Handbook 15) 1990 Nature Conservation in Kingston
    [Show full text]