Studies of West Palearctic Birds 192

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Studies of West Palearctic Birds 192 Studies of West Palearctic birds 192. Bullfinch* Ian Newton n many respects, the handsome Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula is quite distinct I from most other finches of the West Palearctic region. Its coloration is striking, more different between die sexes than with other finches, and both adult and juvenile plumages lack any hint of streaking. The feathers themselves have a soft, silky texture, quite unlike those of other finches. The bill structure is also unique, both the rounded shape and the pattern of grooves on the palate, which function in feeding. For while, like other finches, the Bullfinch cats mainly seeds, it includes a much greater proportion of fleshy fruits and tree buds in its diet than do the other species. Behaviourally, the Bullfinch has been described as 'quiet and unobtrusive'. It remains inconspicuous, even in the nesting season, and, as explained later, it has unusual courtship and breeding behaviour. Another peculiarity, which is well known to bird-ringers, is that it seldom struggles when handled, but usually lies limply with open bill. No other European finch behaves in this way. Despite the bright plumage of the males, Bullfinches are never easy to see. They usually betray their presence by tiieir piping calls or by the flash of white rumps as a small party is flushed from a feeding site. The piping call is quite unlike the multisyllabic twittering calls of Carduelis finches, and is uttered mainly by isolated individuals, apparently wishing to re-establish contact, or by startled birds, suddenly flushed from a feeding site. It is also given in flight. Otherwise, Bullfinches in a group maintain contact with one another using a faint pipping note, which precedes or accompanies short moves within a tree or bush. In distribution, the Bullfinch extends from Ireland, across Eurasia, to Japan. In general, individuals are larger and brighter towards the nordi and towards the tops of mountain ranges. The British birds are given subspecific rank (P. p. nesd) because they are smaller than P. p. pyrrhula from northern Europe and *This paper, and others in this long-running British Birds series, will be published in a forthcoming HarperCollins book. 638 [Brit. Birds 86: 638-648, December 1993] Studies of Bullfinch 639 Siberia, and darker and duller than other continental forms (notably P. p. coccined). The most curious race is P. p. murina of the Azores Islands, in which the male has lost die bright coloration typical of other Bullfinches, and looks like the female (Bibby et al. 1992). Over most of their Eurasian range, Bullfinches breed at low density in forests dominated by coniferous trees, but in western Europe they also extend into broadlcaved woodland. In Britain, they are widespread, breeding in woodland undcrgrowtii, thickets, shrubberies and tall straggling hedgerows, and in the parks and gardens of towns. In various parts of Europe, densities of up to five pairs per knr have been recorded, rising to more than 20 pairs per km2 in patches of especially good nesting habitat, such as scrub or thicket spruce. They arc usually seen singly or in pairs, but, at favoured feeding sites, parties of up to a dozen or more are not infrequent, especially in autumn and winter. Such groups are only loosely bound, however, and throughout the day individuals continually arrive at and leave the feeding site, apparently behaving largely independently of one another. When disturbed, they retreat rapidly into the nearest cover. When numbers of Bullfinches arc feeding together, for example in a fruiting tree, aggression between them is frequent. In the typical threat display, one crouches with its tail twisted to one side, head feathers sleeked and open bill directed towards an opponent, uttering a hoarse braying sound, which carries only about 20 m (Hinde 1955). Where feeding positions arc scarce, diere are also frequent supplanting attacks, in which one bird flies direcdy at another, which flees, allowing the attacker to perch in its place. In extreme cases, the attacker may chase its victim for a few metres, but such chases are more often associated with pair formation than with feeding. Feeding behaviour For most of the year, as mentioned above, Bullfinches feed on the fruits of certain trees and herbaceous plants, switching from one favoured species to another as each in turn comes into crop. During the growing season, many seeds are eaten in a soft, unripencd state. In English woodland, preferred seeds include those of dog's mercury Mercurialis perennis, wych elm Ulmus glabra, birch Betula, meadow-sweet Filipendula ulmaria, bramble Rubus, common netde Urtica dioica, and ash Fraxinus excelsior, while on cultivated land the seeds of many common weeds are eaten, starting in spring with chickweed Stellaria media and dandelion Taraxacum officinale, and followed in turn by various buttercups Ranunculus, sorrel Rumex acetosa, sow-diisdc Sonchus okraceus, redshank Polygonum persicaria, fat-hen Chenopodium album, common nettle and various docks Rumex (Newton 1967, 1972). Towards the end of the growing season, Bullfinches turn increasingly to the seeds that will sustain them through die autumn and winter, initially those of netde, birch and rowan Sorbus aucuparia, and later those of bramble, dock and ash (and, in upland areas, headier Calluna vulgaris). Where it is available, ash forms a major winter food, but Bullfinches feed chiefly from certain individual trees, sometimes completely stripping them during the course of a winter, while avoiding the majority of still-laden trees in the vicinity. Such highly selective feeding occurs because ash seeds contain poisonous phenolic 640 Studies of Bullfinch compounds (Grcig-Smith & Wilson 1985), which, to the human palate, give the seeds a bitter taste. The seeds from preferred trees have lower phenolic content than those from other trees, and also tend to have higher fat contents. As seed supplies arc not replenished during the winter, the size of the initial (Tops, and the rate at which they are depicted, influence the date when they run out, and Bullfinches have to switch from seeds to buds. In southern England, in years of good ash crops, Bullfinches can continue to feed on seeds until February or March, before switching wholly to buds. In years with no ash crop, however, the seeds of other food-plants arc usually eaten by January, and the switch to buds occurs earlier. In these poor seed years, Bullfinches can suffer heavy mortality because buds are often still small then, and poor in nutrients. In January, on a diet of buds alone, the birds may rapidly lose weight, and only later in the year, when buds arc larger, can they subsist on buds alone (Newton 1964). The implication is that, in years of poor seed crops and late bud-swell, food supply can be an important factor limiting Bullfinch numbers (but sec later). Among the buds of wild trees that arc eaten in spring, favourites include blackthorn Prunus spinosa and hawthorn Crataegus monogyna, and, where available, also crab apple Mains sybestris. It is only the centres of the buds which are swallowed, the parts otherwise destined to become fruit. The outer parts are peeled off in the bill and discarded, littering the ground below. Within any one tree species, the birds tend to return repeatedly to those individual trees whose buds arc most advanced. In late spring, as buds open, Bullfinches turn to the flowers, shedding the outer parts and swallowing the ovules. Flowers of sallow Salix, oak Querents and crab apple arc especially favoured, and form the bulk of the diet until fresh seeds become plentiful again. For fruit-growers and gardeners, the Bullfinch creates problems, because it cats the buds from fruit and ornamental trees, reducing the blossom and hence the crop. Cultivated fruit trees have buds of the size most acceptable to Bullfinches, and arc derived from wild species whose buds arc preferred in natural conditions. Various ornamental trees, such as forsythia Forsyihia, arc also attacked in spring, partly because their early flowering requires early bud- swell, ahead of native trees. A single Bullfinch can remove the buds from fruit trees at 30 or more per minute, and in winter the feeding is remarkably systematic, as a bird works along each branch taking all but the terminal buds (Newton 1972). As Bullfinches enter orchards from the adjacent woods and hedgerows, they attack the nearest trees first, penetrating farther into the orchard as the days go by. For this reason, damage is often most marked on the edges of orchards, and declines towards the centre. In general, among cultivated fruits, the* buds of plum and pear arc most preferred, with gooseberries and currants next, followed by apples and cherries, but within any one type of fruit certain varieties are preferred to others. Among pears, for example, 'Conference' is preferred to 'Cornice', so that, in a mixed orchard at blossom time, 'Conference' trees may be almost denuded of flower, while the adjoining 'Cornice' are in full bloom (Newton 1964). The preferences for certain varieties are again linked with earlier A donation from HarperCollins has subsidised the publication of plate 232 in colour. Studies of Bullfinch 641 bud-swell, with higher nutrient content, notably protein and fructose, and in some varieties with lower concentrations of offensive chemicals (Summers & Jones 1976; Greig-Smith 1985a). In January, captive Bullfinches lose weight less rapidly when fed on 'Conference' pear buds than when fed on 'Cornice' pear or wild hawthorn buds (Newton 1964; Summers 1982). In England, the Bullfinch was considered an orchard pest as long ago as the sixteenth century, when one penny was offered in reward for 'everic Bulfynche or other Byrde that dcvoureth the blowthe of fruit'. In southeast England, however, Bullfinch numbers increased enormously in the 1950s, making this for a time the biggest problem that the fruit-growing industry had to contend with.
Recommended publications
  • Winter Ecology Bird List Winter Ecology Field Course, CU MRS T
    Winter Ecology Bird List Winter Ecology field course, CU MRS T. Kittel Field days with Arvind Panjabi, Bird Conservancy of the Rockies (2005-2012,2014-2019) updated 2018 & Ted Floyd, American Birding Association (2013) Observed (v=visual at least, a=audio only, s=sign) cummulative 2019 3-Feb-19 2018 28-Jan-18 2017 5-Feb-17 2016 31-Jan-16 2015 8-Feb-15 2014 9-Feb-14 2013 27-Jan-13 Species (Subspecies) Group class list Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Golden Eagle Hawks & Allies 1 v 1 v - 2nd yr 1 Northern Goshawk Hawks & Allies 1 Sharp-shinned Hawk Hawks & Allies Red-winged Blackbird Blackbirds & Orioles 1 Black-capped Chickadee Chickadees & Titmice 1 v v 1 1 1 1 v/a v 1 a 1 v 1 Mountain Chickadee Chickadees & Titmice 1 v/a v/a 1 v/a 1 1 1 1 v a 1 v/a v 1 v v 1v v 1 Clark's Nutcracker Corvids 1 v 1 v 1 v 1 v/a v 1 v 1 v 1 American Crow Corvids 1 v/a 1 v/a v 1 1 1 1 v v 1 v/a v 1 v 1 v 1 Common Raven Corvids 1 v/a 1 1 1 1 v 1 v/a v 1 v v 1 a v 1 Gray Jay Corvids 1 Black-billed Magpie Corvids 1 v/a 1 v/a 1 1 1 1 v 1 v v 1 v 1 Steller's Jay Corvids 1 v/a 1 v/a 1 1 1 1 v 1 v 1 v a 1 Brown Creeper Creepers 1 111a 1v v1 v1 a1 American Dipper Dippers 1 11 House Finch Finches 1 v1 v1 Cassin's Finch Finches 1 11 v 1 Evening Grosbeak Finches 1 v/a 1 v/a 1 a 1 v, mixed flock 1 Pine Grosbeak Finches 1 v/a 1 Brown-capped Rosy-Finch Finches 1 11 v, mixed flock 1 Black Rosy-Finch Finches 1 v, mixed flock 1 Gray-crowned Rosy Finch Finches
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Ours to Save: the Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada's Endemic Species
    Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Suggested citation: Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife in Your Young Forest.Pdf
    WILDLIFE IN YOUR Young Forest 1 More Wildlife in Your Woods CREATE YOUNG FOREST AND ENJOY THE WILDLIFE IT ATTRACTS WHEN TO EXPECT DIFFERENT ANIMALS his guide presents some of the wildlife you may used to describe this dense, food-rich habitat are thickets, T see using your young forest as it grows following a shrublands, and early successional habitat. timber harvest or other management practice. As development has covered many acres, and as young The following lists focus on areas inhabited by the woodlands have matured to become older forest, the New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis), a rare amount of young forest available to wildlife has dwindled. native rabbit that lives in parts of New York east of the Having diverse wildlife requires having diverse habitats on Hudson River, and in parts of Connecticut, Rhode Island, the land, including some young forest. Massachusetts, southern New Hampshire, and southern Maine. In this region, conservationists and landowners In nature, young forest is created by floods, wildfires, storms, are carrying out projects to create the young forest and and beavers’ dam-building and feeding. To protect lives and shrubland that New England cottontails need to survive. property, we suppress floods, fires, and beaver activities. Such projects also help many other kinds of wildlife that Fortunately, we can use habitat management practices, use the same habitat. such as timber harvests, to mimic natural disturbance events and grow young forest in places where it will do the most Young forest provides abundant food and cover for insects, good. These habitat projects boost the amount of food reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in the Study of Irruptive Migration
    Advances in the study of irruptive migration Ian Newton1 Newton I. 2006. Advances in the study of irruptive migration. Ardea 94(3): 433–460. This paper discusses the movement patterns of two groups of birds which are generally regarded as irruptive migrants, namely (a) boreal finches and others that depend on fluctuating tree-fruit crops, and (b) owls and others that depend on cyclically fluctuating rodent popula- tions. Both groups specialise on food supplies which, in particular regions, fluctuate more than 100-fold from year to year. However, seed- crops in widely separated regions may fluctuate independently of one another, as may rodent populations, so that poor food supplies in one region may coincide with good supplies in another. If individuals are to have access to rich food supplies every year, they must often move hun- dreds or thousands of kilometres from one breeding area to another. In years of widespread food shortage (or high numbers relative to food supplies) extending over many thousands or millions of square kilome- tres, large numbers of individuals migrate to lower latitudes, as an ‘irruptive migration’. For these reasons, the distribution of the popula- tion, in both summer and winter, varies greatly from year to year. In irruptive migrants, in contrast to regular migrants, site fidelity is poor, and few individuals return to the same breeding areas in succes- sive years (apart from owls in the increase phase of the cycle). Moreover, ring recoveries and radio-tracking confirm that the same indi- viduals can breed in different years in areas separated by hundreds or thousands of kilometres.
    [Show full text]
  • Irruption Excitement
    Irruption Excitement n the world of North American birding, “irruption” birds resemble our resident House Finches. The older males refers to a winter in which northern, boreal species are are much more deeply red-purple than the House Finches. Ipushed southwards to find food. This happens when They have a pronounced red head over their eye and no there is a poor seed crop in Canada. It is an infrequent event, brown streaking below their wings, as House Finches do. but we are now in the winter of such a year. If you have Male House Finches also have brown in their faces, around functioning feeders, it will serve you well to keep a sharper and below the level of their eyes. Male Purple Finches have eye open for boreal species, most of which are in the finch a dark patch behind the eye, but are much redder in the face, family. Several years may pass before these birds come south with no brown there. again. The first year male Purple Finches have the same plumage as Nuthatches: One non-finch is the attractive cousin to the females and are brown, streaky birds, like sparrows. The our resident White-breasted Nuthatch, the Red-breasted way to pick out the female Purple Finches is to look for the Nuthatch. These nuthatches prefer spruce and fir forests, large white “supercilium,” the white line over their eyes. This and so are found in the Berkshires and White Mountains takes the place of the red over the eyes of the older males. locally. “Fir tree” here is a reference to trees in the same If you have House Finches coming to your feeders, watch family as the balsam fir that we see in Christmas tree lots, for the colorful outlier among them.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinicola Enucleator (Pine Grosbeak)
    Pinicola enucleator (Pine Grosbeak) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 3 Sources of reported national population data p. 5 Species factsheet bibliography p. 6 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Pinicola enucleator (Pine Grosbeak) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the American Pine Grosbeaks, with the Description of A
    86 THE CONDOR Vol. XXIV ture, never again be at hand. The material is as much lost as is the dodo. Is it not time for many of us collectors and preparators to about face, and be sci- entific and efficient in action as well as in aspiration and reputation? Denver, Colorado, March 4, 1922. NOTES ON THE AMERICAN PINE GROSBEAKS WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SUBSPECIES By ALLAN BROOKS OME ten years ago I received from Mr. C. deB. Green several pine gros- beaks that he had taken near Masset, Queen Charlotte Islands. These S were quite unlike any of the North American pine grosbeaks I had seen and I identified them as Pinicola enucleator flammula Homeyer. When in Wash- ington in November, 1920, I had the opportunity of examining the series of that subspecies from the type locality in the national collection, and it was ob- vious that the Queen Charlotte bird was a distinct subspecies, quite the best differentiated of all the American forms. I have refrained from describing it for a number of reasons, chiefly in the hopes of increasing my series, which had been reduced to three skins. Over a dozen have passed throuph my hands, however, besides a number of others seen in life which I did not shoot, as Mr. Green wished to take their eggs. As there does not seem any immediate probability of acquiring further material I shall describe the subspecies herewith. Pinicola enucleator carlottae. new subspecies Queen Charlotte Pine Grosbeak Type.-Male, red adult, no number, collection of Allan Brooks: Masset, Graham Island, Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia; June 2, 1920; Allan Brooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Sax-Zim Bog and Northeast Minnesota: Jan 17-21, 2019
    TRIP LIST: Sax-Zim Bog and Northeast Minnesota with IAS Jan. 17-21, 2019 Sax-Zim Bog and Northeast Minnesota with the Illinois Audubon Society January 17-21, 2019 Tour leaders: Josh Engel and Ethan Kistler Photo gallery: www.redhillbirding.com/minnesota-2019-gallery-1 BIRD LIST. 41 species. Taxonomy follows the Clements/eBird Checklist, 2018 update. Former (or alternate) English names are in parentheses. (H) = heard only. IUCN Red List status is listed for threatened and near-threatened species: CR=Critically Endangered, EN=Endangered, VU=Vulnerable, NT=Near-threatened. Mallard - Anas platyrhynchos American Black Duck - Anas rubripes With a flock of Mallards on the Duluth lakefront right by the hotel. Long-tailed Duck (VU) - Clangula hyemalis A couple of flocks were in the harbor at Two Harbors. Common Goldeneye - Bucephala clangula Common Merganser - Mergus merganser Red-breasted Merganser - Mergus serrator Sharp-tailed Grouse - Tympanuchus phasianellus Great looks at several individuals in Sax-Zim Bog. Wild Turkey - Meleagris gallopavo Rock Pigeon - Columba livia Herring Gull - Larus argentatus Glaucous Gull - Larus hyperboreus Great looks at adults and immatures at the Superior, Wisconsin, dump. Bald Eagle - Haliaeetus leucocephalus Rough-legged Hawk - Buteo lagopus We were happy to find one at the Superior, Wisconsin, airport, given that none were being regularly seen in the area this winter. Snowy Owl (VU) - Bubo scandiacus A snowy white adult male sitting on a hay bale was one of the first birds we saw in Sax-Zim Bog. Northern Hawk Owl - Surnia ulula Our walk over a packed-snow path in sub-zero temperatures was worth it for the great views we got of this rare owl.
    [Show full text]
  • BB January 2006
    1/06 January 22/12/05 12:26 pm Page 2 The ‘Northern Bullfinch’ invasion of autumn 2004 Mike G. Pennington and Eric R. Meek Alan Harris ABSTRACT A record invasion of ‘Northern Bullfinches’ Pyrrhula pyrrhula pyrrhula occurred in Britain in autumn 2004. It also affected many other parts of Europe with birds being recorded as far afield as Iceland, Ireland, Italy and Bulgaria. As well as in Britain and Ireland, record numbers were seen in parts of Scandinavia and several countries in central and eastern Europe. Field identification of ‘Northern Bullfinches’ is difficult, as there is no single diagnostic feature. However, trapped birds are easily separable using biometrics (particularly wing length). Many, but not all, birds in the 2004 influx were giving a distinctive call, which became known as the ‘trumpet call’.This call is not diagnostic of Northern Bullfinch, as birds over most of the range of this subspecies give a call hardly distinguishable from that of ‘British Bullfinch’ P. p. pileata.Although the ‘trumpet call’ was unfamiliar to most observers and attracted much attention, it was soon established that birds giving such a call had been recorded in northern and western Europe before. Speculation on the birds’ origin was widespread, and research so far has suggested that European Russia is the most likely source (a recording from the Komi Republic matches the ‘trumpet’ call), although others, possibly lingering from previous influxes, have been heard farther west in the breeding season. 2 © British Birds 99 • January 2006 • 2–24 1/06 January 22/12/05 12:26 pm Page 3 The ‘Northern Bullfinch’ invasion of autumn 2004 n autumn 2004, large numbers of other parts of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Warmth and the Cold
    The Warmth and the Cold Following the warmest December on record on the Chippewa, at the end of possibly the warmest recorded year on Earth, cold weather has once again descended upon northern Minnesota. Some snow has brought a bit of the insulating blanket that so many north woods wildlife depend upon in order to survive the elements as the thermometer drops. My old dog lies on the floor near my feet, as we both sit close by the cookstove. She grumbles at me if I let the fire die down and the cold creeps along the kitchen floor. She still spends her days with the logger in the woods, but the cold gets to her more now than it used to. The logger grumbles, too on cold days when his bones ache. The birds at the feeder tell the story of a period of transition. Below the feeder huddles a mourning dove. This bird should be south of us now, but due to bird feeders and warming winters, now is seen in the Twin Cities even this time of year. I am doubtful this one will make it through this cold snap, but we shall see. Perched on top of the feeder are pine grosbeaks, down from the north. Pine grosbeaks are large, very tame finches we see in northern Minnesota irregularly in the wintertime. They breed in the far north in subarctic and boreal forests of northern Canada. In the summer they feed on insects, and use their conical beaks to nip the buds and growing tips of conifer branches.
    [Show full text]