DOCSLIB.ORG

REPRESENTATION THEORY of FINITE GROUPS 1. Important Stuff

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPRESENTATION THEORY of FINITE GROUPS 1. Important Stuff REPRESENTATION THEORY OF FINITE GROUPS VIPUL NAIK Abstract. The course Representation Theory of Finite Groups was taught by Senthamarai Kan- nan. Here, I give the list of important results proved in this course. 1. Important stuff taught in the course 1.1. Orthogonality results. Let G be a finite group. For this list, all representations are over Q. • First orthogonality theorem (result stated): The characters of irreducible representations of G form an orthonormal basis for the space of class functions. This set of characters is denoted as X(G). Thus, the cardinality of X(G) is the number of conjugacy classes of G. • The multiplicity of each character in the regular representation equals its degree. Thus the sum of squares of degrees of irreducible representations is the cardinality of G. • Grand orthogonality theorem (result stated): If we choose the irreducible unitary represen- tations, all the matrix entry functions for these irreducible unitary representations form an orthogonal basis for the space of functions on the group. This result is the • Second orthogonality theorem (result stated): Given any two distinct conjugacy classes, the inner product of those conjugacy classes with respect to irreducible representations is 0. • The characters of representations are precisely the N0-linear combinations of elements of X(G). This is termed R+(G). A class function that is a Z-linear combination of elements of X(G) is termed a virtual character(defined). 1.2. Other results. • The product of two characters is a character. In fact, it is the character of the tensor product of the corresponding representations. Thus, R(G) is a ring. • If χ is a character, and k is relatively prime to the order of the group, then x 7→ χ(xk) is also a character. The operator that takes χ to this character is termed Ψk. • If χ(x) = χ(y), then χ(xk) = χ(yk) whenever k is relatively prime to the order of the group. • Given any conjugacy class, there is a character that takes the value 0 at that conjugacy class. This is proved by using norm-squared, and using a Cauchy-Scwarz inequality to exchange product and summation. 1.3. Induction and restriction. We defined induction and restriction on characters. We have the following results: • Frobenius reciprocity G G G • IndH (f1.ResH f2) = IndH (f1).f2. • Mackey’s lemma and Mackey’s irreducibility criterion. This essentially gives a relation between the characters from two subgroups. 2. Artin’s theorem 2.1. Statement. Artin’s theorem states that th class functions induced from cyclic subgroups cover the whole group. Here’s a formulation of Artin’s theorem: Theorem 1 (Artin’s theorem). Let X be a collection of subgroups of a group G. Then, the following are equivalent: • The union of conjugates of subgroups inside X is the whole of G. • FC (G) is generated by the images of Ind : FC (H) → FC (G) for H ∈ X. c Vipul Naik, B.Sc. (Hons) Math and C.S., Chennai Mathematical Institute. 1 • Every element of R(G) is a Q-linear combination of elements induced from R(H) as H varies over members of X. 2.2. Proof idea of Artin’s theorem. The equivalence of the second and third statements essentially follows from the fact that if anything in R(G) is a combination of elements induced from R(H)s, then it must be a Q-linear combination. The hard part is showing that the first two are equivalent. For this, we prove that surjectivity of the induction map is equivalent to injectivity of the restriction map. This comes from the following: If H is a subgroup of G, then a class function on G is zero restricted to H if and only if it is orthogonal to all class functions induced from H. 2.3. For cyclic subgroups. Artin’s theorem tells us, in particular, that the ring FC (G) is generated by the class functions induced from FC (H) where H varies over cyclic subgroups. For cyclic subgroups, we can actualyl say something stronger. We prove the following results: • Given a cyclic group C, the class function that sends a particular generator to |C| and every other element to 0 is in A ⊗ R(C). This follows from the second orthogonality theorem. • Thus, in particular, for a cyclic group, any class function that sends generators to multiples of |C| and other thigns to 0, lies inside A ⊗ R(C). • On a group, the class function that sends each element to |G| is the sum of the induced class functions from the θ class functions of cyclic subgroups. • By using the induction-restriction formula, we obtain that any class function with integer values divisible by |G| is in the sum of the induced parts from R(C) for cyclic subgroups C. 2.4. Why we cannot get Z-linear combinations. The main problem is that it may happen that the characters may always take values in a certain ideal. This is because the indices ofall the cyclic subgroups may not be relatively prime. 3. Brauer’s theorem 3.1. Statement. Quick definitions: Definition. Let p be a prime. A finite group is said to be p-elementary(defined) if it is the direct product of a p-group and a cyclic group of order relatively prime to p. Statement of Brauer’s theorem: Let G be a finite group. Then, R(G) is in the Z-span of characters induced from elemen- tary subgroups. 3.2. First step of proof. Let A be the ring generated by the |G|th roots of unity. The first step is in showing that if χ is any character, then χ(x) = χ(xs) where xs is the p-semisimple (or p-regular) part of x. 3.3. Next step of proof. We proceed as follows: • For a p-regular element g, let C be the cyclic subgroup generated by g. Then, consider the element of R(C) that associates |C| to g and 0 to other elements. Let P be a Sylow subgroup of the centralizer of g. Then C × P is an elementary p-subgroup. Extend the element of A ⊗ R(C) to an element of A ⊗ R(C × P ) by composing with the projection. Now induce to an element of A ⊗ R(G). This character is zero on all elements whose semisimple parts are not conjugate to x, and is not 0 modulo p on all elements whose semisimple part is conjugate to x. We crucially use the fact that the index of P in the centralizer is relatively priem to p. • Add such elements up for all semisimple conjugacy classes. The sum we get is a character ψ that is not zero modulo p for any element. Let N = φ(pr). Take l(ψN − 1). Since ψ ∈ A ⊗ R(G), so is ψN . Also, since ψN − 1 takes values divisible by pr for every r, the product takes values divisible by |G| and is hence actually in R(G). Thus, taking lψN − l(ψN − 1) we obtain that l is in Vp(G). • We now put the things together for each prime p. 2 4. Rationality questions 4.1. Basic results. • Every representation of a group is realizable over the field containing the |G|th roots of unity. • The characters over a field K containing Q form an otrhonormal basis for the space of functions of ΓK -conjugacy classes, that is, the classes by taking the equivalence relation generated by conjugation and powering by things allowed in the Galois group of K over Q. • If RK (G) denotes the Z-span of characetrs of representations realizable over K and RK (G) denotes the Z-span of characters of representations such that the character has values fully inside K. Then, RK (G) has finite index in RK (G). This finite index is termed the Schur index. ALl this is closely related to the fact that Ψk are all operators from R(G) to R(G). Why is this important: roughly because it shows the following: Let K be a field extension of Q and σ be a Galois conjugation of K over Q. Suppose the character of a representation has values in K. Then σ applied to th characetr values also gives the character of a representation. Another interesting consequence is the following: If χ is the character of a representation, and χ(x) = χ(y), then χ(xk) = χ(yk). 5. Other results related to Brauer’s theorem 5.1. A theorem of Frobenius. Theorem 2 (Frobenius’ thoerem). If f is a class function on G with values on A, and g = |G|, the function g/(g, n)Ψn(f) belongs to A ⊗ R(G). ALternative formulations are: n • For each conjugacy class c, let fc be the indicator function for c. Then, the function g/(g, n)Ψ (fc) belongs to A ⊗ R(G). P • For each conjugacy class c of G, and each character χ of G, the expression 1/(g, n) xn∈c χ(x) ∈ A. The proof of Frobenius’ theorem arises by first reducing it to the case fo elementary subgroups (using Brauer’s theorem) and then reducing from elementary subgroups to p-groups (by using the fact that it is a direct product) and then usnig the fact that every character of a p-group. 5.2. Converse to Brauer’s theorem. Lemma 1. Let p be a prime number, and x a p-regular element. Let C×P be an associated elementary subgroup. Suppose H does not contain any conjugate of this associated elementary subgroup.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arithmetic Equivalence and Isospectrality
    ARITHMETIC EQUIVALENCE AND ISOSPECTRALITY ANDREW V.SUTHERLAND ABSTRACT. In these lecture notes we give an introduction to the theory of arithmetic equivalence, a notion originally introduced in a number theoretic setting to refer to number fields with the same zeta function. Gassmann established a direct relationship between arithmetic equivalence and a purely group theoretic notion of equivalence that has since been exploited in several other areas of mathematics, most notably in the spectral theory of Riemannian manifolds by Sunada. We will explicate these results and discuss some applications and generalizations. 1. AN INTRODUCTION TO ARITHMETIC EQUIVALENCE AND ISOSPECTRALITY Let K be a number field (a finite extension of Q), and let OK be its ring of integers (the integral closure of Z in K). The Dedekind zeta function of K is defined by the Dirichlet series X s Y s 1 ζK (s) := N(I)− = (1 N(p)− )− I OK p − ⊆ where the sum ranges over nonzero OK -ideals, the product ranges over nonzero prime ideals, and N(I) := [OK : I] is the absolute norm. For K = Q the Dedekind zeta function ζQ(s) is simply the : P s Riemann zeta function ζ(s) = n 1 n− . As with the Riemann zeta function, the Dirichlet series (and corresponding Euler product) defining≥ the Dedekind zeta function converges absolutely and uniformly to a nonzero holomorphic function on Re(s) > 1, and ζK (s) extends to a meromorphic function on C and satisfies a functional equation, as shown by Hecke [25]. The Dedekind zeta function encodes many features of the number field K: it has a simple pole at s = 1 whose residue is intimately related to several invariants of K, including its class number, and as with the Riemann zeta function, the zeros of ζK (s) are intimately related to the distribution of prime ideals in OK .
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on FINITE GROUP REPRESENTATIONS in Fall 2020, I
    NOTES ON FINITE GROUP REPRESENTATIONS CHARLES REZK In Fall 2020, I taught an undergraduate course on abstract algebra. I chose to spend two weeks on the theory of complex representations of finite groups. I covered the basic concepts, leading to the classification of representations by characters. I also briefly addressed a few more advanced topics, notably induced representations and Frobenius divisibility. I'm making the lectures and these associated notes for this material publicly available. The material here is standard, and is mainly based on Steinberg, Representation theory of finite groups, Ch 2-4, whose notation I will mostly follow. I also used Serre, Linear representations of finite groups, Ch 1-3.1 1. Group representations Given a vector space V over a field F , we write GL(V ) for the group of bijective linear maps T : V ! V . n n When V = F we can write GLn(F ) = GL(F ), and identify the group with the group of invertible n × n matrices. A representation of a group G is a homomorphism of groups φ: G ! GL(V ) for some representation choice of vector space V . I'll usually write φg 2 GL(V ) for the value of φ on g 2 G. n When V = F , so we have a homomorphism φ: G ! GLn(F ), we call it a matrix representation. matrix representation The choice of field F matters. For now, we will look exclusively at the case of F = C, i.e., representations in complex vector spaces. Remark. Since R ⊆ C is a subfield, GLn(R) is a subgroup of GLn(C).
    [Show full text]
  • Class Numbers of Totally Real Number Fields
    CLASS NUMBERS OF TOTALLY REAL NUMBER FIELDS BY JOHN C. MILLER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School|New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Mathematics Written under the direction of Henryk Iwaniec and approved by New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Class numbers of totally real number fields by John C. Miller Dissertation Director: Henryk Iwaniec The determination of the class number of totally real fields of large discriminant is known to be a difficult problem. The Minkowski bound is too large to be useful, and the root discriminant of the field can be too large to be treated by Odlyzko's discriminant bounds. This thesis describes a new approach. By finding nontrivial lower bounds for sums over prime ideals of the Hilbert class field, we establish upper bounds for class numbers of fields of larger discriminant. This analytic upper bound, together with algebraic arguments concerning the divisibility properties of class numbers, allows us to determine the class numbers of many number fields that have previously been untreatable by any known method. For example, we consider the cyclotomic fields and their real subfields. Surprisingly, the class numbers of cyclotomic fields have only been determined for fields of small conductor, e.g. for prime conductors up to 67, due to the problem of finding the class number of its maximal real subfield, a problem first considered by Kummer. Our results have significantly improved the situation. We also study the cyclotomic Zp-extensions of the rationals.
    [Show full text]
  • REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of GL Kand Sn A
    REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of GLk and Sn A character of an irreducible representation of GLk is a polynomial function con- stant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable matrices is dense in GLk, a character is defined by its values on the subgroup of diagonal matrices in GLk. Thus, one can consider a character as a polynomial function of x1,...,xk. Moreover, a character is a symmetric polynomial of x1,...,xk as the matrices diag (x1,...,xk) and diag xs(1),...,xs(k) are conjugate for any s ∈ Sk. For example, the character of the standard representation in E is equal to x1 + ⊗n n ··· + xk and the character of E is equal to (x1 + ··· + xk) . Let λ = (λ1,...,λk) be such that λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ ···≥ λk ≥ 0. Let Dλ denote the λj determinant of the k × k-matrix whose i, j entry equals xi . It is clear that Dλ is a skew-symmetric polynomial of x1,...,xk. If ρ = (k − 1,..., 1, 0) then Dρ = i≤j (xi − xj) is the well known Vandermonde determinant. Let Q Dλ+ρ Sλ = . Dρ It is easy to see that Sλ is a symmetric polynomial of x1,...,xk. It is called a Schur λ1 λk polynomial. The leading monomial of Sλ is the x ...xk (if one orders monomials lexicographically) and therefore it is not hard to show that Sλ form a basis in the ring of symmetric polynomials of x1,...,xk. Theorem 1.1. The character of Wλ equals to Sλ. I do not include a proof of this Theorem since it uses beautiful but hard combina- toric.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem 1 Show That If Π Is an Irreducible Representation of a Compact Lie Group G Then Π∨ Is Also Irreducible
    Problem 1 Show that if π is an irreducible representation of a compact lie group G then π_ is also irreducible. Give an example of a G and π such that π =∼ π_, and another for which π π_. Is this true for general groups? R 2 Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G jχπ_ (g)j dg = R 2 R 2 _ G jχπ(g)j dg = G jχπ(g)j dg = 1, so π is irreducible. For any G, the trivial representation π _ i i satisfies π ' π . For G the cyclic group of order 3 generated by g, the representation π : g 7! ζ3 _ i −i is not isomorphic to π : g 7! ζ3 . This is true for finite dimensional irreducible representations. This follows as if W ⊆ V a proper, non-zero G-invariant representation for a group G, then W ? = fφ 2 V ∗jφ(W ) = 0g is a proper, non-zero G-invariant subspace and applying this to V ∗ as V ∗∗ =∼ V we get V is irreducible if and only if V ∗ is irreducible. This is false for general representations and general groups. Take G = S1 to be the symmetric group on countably infinitely many letters, and let G act on a vector space V over C with basis e1; e2; ··· by sending σ : ei 7! eσ(i). Let W be the sub-representation given by the kernel of the map P P V ! C sending λiei 7! λi. Then W is irreducible because given any λ1e1 + ··· + λnen 2 V −1 where λn 6= 0, and we see that λn [(n n + 1) − 1] 2 C[G] sends this to en+1 − en, and elements like ∗ ∗ this span W .
    [Show full text]
  • Extending Real-Valued Characters of Finite General Linear and Unitary Groups on Elements Related to Regular Unipotents
    EXTENDING REAL-VALUED CHARACTERS OF FINITE GENERAL LINEAR AND UNITARY GROUPS ON ELEMENTS RELATED TO REGULAR UNIPOTENTS ROD GOW AND C. RYAN VINROOT Abstract. Let GL(n; Fq)hτi and U(n; Fq2 )hτi denote the finite general linear and unitary groups extended by the transpose inverse automorphism, respec- tively, where q is a power of p. Let n be odd, and let χ be an irreducible character of either of these groups which is an extension of a real-valued char- acter of GL(n; Fq) or U(n; Fq2 ). Let yτ be an element of GL(n; Fq)hτi or 2 U(n; Fq2 )hτi such that (yτ) is regular unipotent in GL(n; Fq) or U(n; Fq2 ), respectively. We show that χ(yτ) = ±1 if χ(1) is prime to p and χ(yτ) = 0 oth- erwise. Several intermediate results on real conjugacy classes and real-valued characters of these groups are obtained along the way. 1. Introduction Let F be a field and let n be a positive integer. Let GL(n; F) denote the general linear group of degree n over F. In the special case that F is the finite field of order q, we denote the corresponding general linear group by GL(n; Fq). Let τ denote the involutory automorphism of GL(n; F) which maps an element g to its transpose inverse (g0)−1, where g0 denotes the transpose of g, and let GL(n; F)hτi denote the semidirect product of GL(n; F) by τ. Thus in GL(n; F)hτi, we have τ 2 = 1 and τgτ = (g0)−1 for g 2 GL(n; F).
    [Show full text]
  • Math 263A Notes: Algebraic Combinatorics and Symmetric Functions
    MATH 263A NOTES: ALGEBRAIC COMBINATORICS AND SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 2. 10/26/16 5 2.1. Logistics 5 2.2. Overview 5 2.3. Down to Math 5 2.4. Partitions 6 2.5. Partial Orders 7 2.6. Monomial Symmetric Functions 7 2.7. Elementary symmetric functions 8 2.8. Course Outline 8 3. 9/28/16 9 3.1. Elementary symmetric functions eλ 9 3.2. Homogeneous symmetric functions, hλ 10 3.3. Power sums pλ 12 4. 9/30/16 14 5. 10/3/16 20 5.1. Expected Number of Fixed Points 20 5.2. Random Matrix Groups 22 5.3. Schur Functions 23 6. 10/5/16 24 6.1. Review 24 6.2. Schur Basis 24 6.3. Hall Inner product 27 7. 10/7/16 29 7.1. Basic properties of the Cauchy product 29 7.2. Discussion of the Cauchy product and related formulas 30 8. 10/10/16 32 8.1. Finishing up last class 32 8.2. Skew-Schur Functions 33 8.3. Jacobi-Trudi 36 9. 10/12/16 37 1 2 AARON LANDESMAN 9.1. Eigenvalues of unitary matrices 37 9.2. Application 39 9.3. Strong Szego limit theorem 40 10. 10/14/16 41 10.1. Background on Tableau 43 10.2. KOSKA Numbers 44 11. 10/17/16 45 11.1. Relations of skew-Schur functions to other fields 45 11.2. Characters of the symmetric group 46 12. 10/19/16 49 13. 10/21/16 55 13.1.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUP REPRESENTATIONS and CHARACTER THEORY Contents 1
    GROUP REPRESENTATIONS AND CHARACTER THEORY DAVID KANG Abstract. In this paper, we provide an introduction to the representation theory of finite groups. We begin by defining representations, G-linear maps, and other essential concepts before moving quickly towards initial results on irreducibility and Schur's Lemma. We then consider characters, class func- tions, and show that the character of a representation uniquely determines it up to isomorphism. Orthogonality relations are introduced shortly afterwards. Finally, we construct the character tables for a few familiar groups. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 1 3. Group Representations 2 4. Maschke's Theorem and Complete Reducibility 4 5. Schur's Lemma and Decomposition 5 6. Character Theory 7 7. Character Tables for S4 and Z3 12 Acknowledgments 13 References 14 1. Introduction The primary motivation for the study of group representations is to simplify the study of groups. Representation theory offers a powerful approach to the study of groups because it reduces many group theoretic problems to basic linear algebra calculations. To this end, we assume that the reader is already quite familiar with linear algebra and has had some exposure to group theory. With this said, we begin with a preliminary section on group theory. 2. Preliminaries Definition 2.1. A group is a set G with a binary operation satisfying (1) 8 g; h; i 2 G; (gh)i = g(hi)(associativity) (2) 9 1 2 G such that 1g = g1 = g; 8g 2 G (identity) (3) 8 g 2 G; 9 g−1 such that gg−1 = g−1g = 1 (inverses) Definition 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1405.1094V1 [Math.NT] 5 May 2014 Fdtriigtecasnme Srte Icl O Ed Flredis Large Calculated
    CLASS NUMBERS OF TOTALLY REAL FIELDS AND APPLICATIONS TO THE WEBER CLASS NUMBER PROBLEM JOHN C. MILLER Abstract. The determination of the class number of totally real fields of large dis- criminant is known to be a difficult problem. The Minkowski bound is too large to be useful, and the root discriminant of the field can be too large to be treated by Odlyzko’s discriminant bounds. We describe a new technique for determining the class number of such fields, allowing us to attack the class number problem for a large class of number fields not treatable by previously known methods. We give an application to Weber’s class number problem, which is the conjecture that all real cyclotomic fields of power of 2 conductor have class number 1. 1. Introduction Although the class number is a fundamental invariant of number fields, the problem of determining the class number is rather difficult for fields of large discriminant. Even cyclotomic fields of relatively small conductor have discriminants too large for their class numbers to be calculated. The difficulty is that the Minkowski bound for a totally real field of degree n, n! M(K)= d(K) , nn | | is often far too large to be useful. For example,p to prove that the real cyclotomic field of conductor 256 has class number 1 using the Minkowski bound, we would need to check that every prime integer below the Minkowski bound factors into principal prime ideals, requiring us to check more than 1078 primes! The approach of using Odlyzko’s discriminant bounds can handle fields of larger discriminant than using the Minkowski bound, but this technique, as applied by Masley arXiv:1405.1094v1 [math.NT] 5 May 2014 [4] and van der Linden [3], encountered a barrier: Odlyzko’s discriminant lower bounds could only establish an upper bound for the class number of a totally real field of degree n if its root discriminant, the nth root of the discriminant, was sufficiently small.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Finite Groups
    Representations of finite groups Abstract A micro-introduction to the theory of representations of finite groups. 1 Representations Let G be a finite group. A linear representation of G is a homomorphism ρ : G → GL(V ) where GL(V ) is the group of invertable linear transformations of the vector space V . We shall restrict ourselves to finite-dimensional V . The dimension dim V = n is called the degree of the representation. In order to make life easy, we only consider vector spaces over C, the field of complex numbers. (The theory is easy for finite groups because we can average over the group to get something that is invariant for the group action. In the averaging process we divide by the order of the group, and the theory (of modular representations) is more difficult when the characteristic of the field divides the order of G. For Schur’s Lemma we need an eigenvalue, and life is a bit easier for algebraically closed fields.) Two representations ρ1 : G → GL(V1) and ρ2 : G → GL(V2) are called equivalent when they are not really different: V1 and V2 have the same dimen- sion, and for a suitable choice of bases in V1 and V2 the matrices of ρ1(g) and ρ2(g) are the same, for all g ∈ G. (Equivalently, ρ1 and ρ2 are equivalent when there is a linear isomorphism f : V1 → V2 such that fρ1(g) = ρ2(g)f for all g ∈ G.) A subspace W of V is called ρ(G)-invariant if ρ(g)W ⊆ W for all g ∈ G.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Representation Theory of Finite Groups
    Basic Theory of Finite Group Representations over C Adam B Block 1 Introduction We introduce the basics of the representation theory of finite groups in characteristic zero. In the sequel, all groups G will be finite and all vector spaces V will be finite dimensional over C. We first define representa- tions and give some basic examples. Then we discuss morphisms and subrepresentations, followed by basic operations on representations and character theory. We conclude with induced and restricted representa- tions and mention Frobenius Reciprocity. These notes are intended as the background to the UMS summer seminar on the representation theory of symmetric groups from [AMV04]. The author learned this material originally from [FH] and recommends this source for more detail in the following; many of the proofs in the sequel likely come from this source. 2 Definitions and Examples Representation theory is the study of groups acting on vector spaces. As such, we have the following definition: Definition 1. A representation of a group G is a pair (V; ρ) where V is a vector space over C and ρ is a homomorphism ρ : G ! GL(V ). We will often refer to representations by their vector space and assume that the morphism ρ is clear from context. Every representation defines a unique C[G]-module, with the action of G on V being g · v = ρ(g)(v) and vice versa. We refer to the dimension of the representation, defined to be dim V . With the definition in mind, we begin with a few examples. Example 2. Let G be any group and V any vector space.
    [Show full text]
  • L-Functions and Non-Abelian Class Field Theory, from Artin to Langlands
    L-functions and non-abelian class field theory, from Artin to Langlands James W. Cogdell∗ Introduction Emil Artin spent the first 15 years of his career in Hamburg. Andr´eWeil charac- terized this period of Artin's career as a \love affair with the zeta function" [77]. Claude Chevalley, in his obituary of Artin [14], pointed out that Artin's use of zeta functions was to discover exact algebraic facts as opposed to estimates or approxi- mate evaluations. In particular, it seems clear to me that during this period Artin was quite interested in using the Artin L-functions as a tool for finding a non- abelian class field theory, expressed as the desire to extend results from relative abelian extensions to general extensions of number fields. Artin introduced his L-functions attached to characters of the Galois group in 1923 in hopes of developing a non-abelian class field theory. Instead, through them he was led to formulate and prove the Artin Reciprocity Law - the crowning achievement of abelian class field theory. But Artin never lost interest in pursuing a non-abelian class field theory. At the Princeton University Bicentennial Conference on the Problems of Mathematics held in 1946 \Artin stated that `My own belief is that we know it already, though no one will believe me { that whatever can be said about non-Abelian class field theory follows from what we know now, since it depends on the behavior of the broad field over the intermediate fields { and there are sufficiently many Abelian cases.' The critical thing is learning how to pass from a prime in an intermediate field to a prime in a large field.
    [Show full text]