DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 73/Friday, April 15, 2011/Proposed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 73/Friday, April 15, 2011/Proposed 21272 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules umbrella, constitutes time that must be statutory and regulatory interpretation DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE included in the calculation of duty time suggest that the specific standard of one to determine the rest required under day off every week cannot be rendered Forest Service § 121.377, whether or not that unit itself completely inoperative by the more must adhere to the requirements of general equivalent standard. A previous 36 CFR Part 294 § 121.377. An employee using accrued interpretation allowed that a work RIN 0596–AC74 vacation or credit time is not ‘‘on duty’’ schedule that provides for personnel to even though the employee may receive have a group of 4 days off followed by Special Areas; Roadless Area compensation for that time. up to 24 days of work, or vice versa, Conservation; Applicability to the Nevertheless, the regulation aims to would still meet the standard of being National Forests in Colorado require repair stations to give its ‘‘equivalent’’ to one day off in every maintenance personnel at least one day AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. seven within a month. Legal off every week without requiring that ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. employee to use accrued vacation time Interpretation to Ron Webb from Donald to be free from any responsibility for P. Byrne, Assistant Chief Counsel, SUMMARY: The Forest Service, U.S. work. Regulations (June 21, 1991). That Department of Agriculture (USDA), is Once Pratt relieves the employee from interpretation, however, was issued proposing to establish a State-specific duty, the regulation does not require prior to the findings relating fatigue to rule to provide management direction Pratt to monitor the employee’s maintenance related errors in the air for conserving and managing activities. The scenario where an carrier industry discussed in AC 120– inventoried roadless areas on National employee uses the time off from Pratt to 72. Webster’s dictionary defines Forest System (NFS) lands in Colorado. work at another maintenance facility ‘‘equivalent’’ as having logical A proposed rule was published in the does not implicate Pratt’s compliance equivalence, or corresponding or July 25, 2008, Federal Register. In with § 121.377. Unlike the regulations virtually identical in effect or function. response to public comment on the 2008 governing crewmember duty time, Today, we would not view as compliant Proposed Rule and a revised petition § 121.377 does not contain a limit on an a schedule that provides over the course submitted by the State of Colorado on April 6, 2010, the Forest Service is employee’s total accumulated working of eight weeks for four days off followed publishing a new proposed rule. hours within a specified period of time. by 48 straight days of duty followed by The Agency is inviting public The FAA does not recommend this four more days off. Such a work practice, however, for the reasons comment on this new proposed rule and schedule that generally provides for an discussed in AC 120–72 related to accompanying revised draft average of one day off over several fatigue. Thus, an employee relieved environmental impact statement ‘‘ ’’ from duty by Pratt may perform other weeks cannot be said to be equivalent (RDEIS). The Agency is interested in aviation related maintenance, even for to the more specific standard requiring public comments on the changes to other facilities which themselves are one day off out of every seven days. exceptions and prohibitions on bound by § 121.377, provided the Lastly, you correctly note that the activities in roadless areas that have employee is provided the requisite time regulation does not address the length of been developed in response to public off by each facility for which the the work day, only the length of the comments on the 2008 Proposed Rule. employee works. Pratt must use caution, required time off work. The legal The Agency is particularly interested in however, not to create the appearance of interpretation from Mr. Byrne to Mr. receiving public comments on the requiring an employee to work during Webb also makes clear that the general concept, management, and rationale for off hours for another facility that is just equivalency provision in § 121.377 does designation of specific areas within a corporate sister to the Pratt facility. not apply to the specific requirement to Colorado Roadless Areas identified as You also raise the question of whether ‘‘ ’’ give 24 consecutive hours of time off. upper tier. In this proposed rule, these a facility can schedule employees to Time off may not be provided in smaller areas are provided a higher level of work more than six consecutive days, protection than the 2001 Roadless Rule, thereby grouping required days off, and increments over several days even though the total time off over any seven DATES: Comments must be received in still remain in compliance with writing by July 14, 2011. § 121.377. The regulatory standard day period may equal or exceed 24 ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent via requires 24 consecutive hours off duty hours. e-mail to [email protected]. during any seven consecutive days but We appreciate your patience and trust Comments may also be submitted via also contains some flexibility in the that the above responds to your the Internet at http:// phrase ‘‘or the equivalent thereof within concerns. If you need further assistance, www.regulations.gov. Written comments any one calendar month.’’ The FAA please contact my staff at (202) 267– concerning this notice should be intended that the regulation allow 3073. This response was prepared by addressed to: Colorado Roadless Rule/ employees to work in excess of six Anne Bechdolt, Attorney in the EIS, P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento, CA consecutive days in the event of a Operations Law Branch of the national emergency or unusual 95812. Regulations Division of the Office of the All comments, including names and occurrence in the air carrier industry. Chief Counsel, and coordinated with the addresses, are placed in the record and See Legal Interpretation 1987–15 (June Aircraft Maintenance and Air are available for public inspection and 14, 1987). The regulatory flexibility copying. The public may inspect found in § 121.377 allows maintenance Transportation divisions of Flight comments received at http:// personnel to work a schedule that Standards Service. roadless.fs.fed.us. maintains the ‘‘equivalent’’ to one day Rebecca B. MacPherson, off every week even though that Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: schedule might provide for more than [FR Doc. 2011–9236 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am] Colorado Roadless Rule Team Leader six consecutive days of work. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Ken Tu at (303) 275–5156. Individuals The equivalent standard, however, using telecommunication devices for the does have limits. The tenants of deaf (TDD) may call the Federal VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:22 Apr 14, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15APP1.SGM 15APP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules 21273 Information Relay Service (FIRS) at Committee (RACNAC) and public risk from wildfire to a municipal water 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and comment on the 2008 Proposed Rule supply system. The 2001 Rule exception 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Monday both provided a national perspective. for ecosystem maintenance and through Friday. The RACNAC was specifically designed restoration allows tree cutting anywhere SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: as an advisory committee composed of within roadless areas. national interests to provide a national In the proposed rule, an upper tier of Background perspective, and it no longer exists. The protection has been designated with As a leader in natural resource vast majority of respondents to the 2008 fewer exceptions than the 2001 Rule for conservation, the Forest Service Proposed Rule expressed a desire for a road construction and reconstruction provides direction for the management rule that protects roadless area and tree cutting. Exceptions are not and use of the Nation’s forests, characteristics now and for future allowed for road reconstruction and rangeland, and aquatic ecosystems generations. However, some realignment, and temporary roads for under its jurisdiction. Similarly, the respondents suggested alternative, less public health and safety. The 2001 Rule State of Colorado is committed to restrictive roadless regulations. This tree-cutting exceptions for maintenance sustained natural resource use and proposed rule includes prohibitions on and restoration of ecosystem conservation of State and Federal land tree-cutting, sale, or removal; road characteristics, and for habitat within its borders. Furthermore, the construction/reconstruction; and linear improvement for endangered, Forest Service is charged to collaborate construction zones, all with limited threatened or sensitive species are not cooperatively with States and other exceptions tailored to address specific allowed in the upper tier of the interested parties regarding the use and issues. This proposed rule requires, in proposed rule. management of the National Forest many cases, the Regional Forester to State of Colorado Petitions System (NFS). make specific determinations prior to Colorado’s Roadless Areas are of great authorizing exceptions. On July 14, 2005, the State of importance to the people of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision
    APPENDICES A-D Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision June 2010 Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Appendices for ROD — 1 Record of Decision (ROD) Gunnison National Forest Travel Management DECISION TABLE KEY FOR APPENDICES A-D Decision Code Description F Trail open to and designed for Foot travel l HO Trail designed for Pack and Saddle (P&S) use, allowed use is Foot and P&S U Unmanaged Foot/P&S trail, not a part of the maintained or signed trail system NM/MB Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to mountain bike trail design standards NM/HO Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to pack and saddle design standards MO Trail open to and designed for Single Track motorized travel ATV Trail open to and designed for motorized vehicles less than 50 inches in width JEEP OHV Trail - opened to all motorized vehicles, managed as a trail HC High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3 High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3_NNL High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG4 Passenger vehicle road (Level 4) licensed and non-licensed vehicles allowed PSG5 Passenger vehicle road (Level 5) licensed vehicles only D Route is identified to be closed DE Route is currently decommissioned and will remain closed A Administrative road, motorized travel is allowed by permit A-TRAIL Non motorized trail allowing administrative use by motorized vehicles less than 50 in.
    [Show full text]
  • IV. Motorized Recreation Route Recommendations
    APPENDIX IV COHVCO – TPA –RMEC COMMENTS 6/1/09 IV. Motorized Recreation Route Recommendations The following roads and trails are recommended by COHVCO, in addition to those in the preliminary proposed alternative, and those submitted as a group recommendation in the Colorado 500 letter dated 15 September 2006. These are intended to be a part of an alternative in the DEIS that more fully responds and addresses a historic and enhanced motorized recreation transportation system for all federal lands in the Gunnison Basin. Recommendations 1. Trail 561 Eyrie Basin Trail. An historically used trail by miners and modern day single track motorcyclists. From Italian Creek Road, it drops steeply into Eyrie Creek Basin where it connects to the Taylor Park Road. This trail accesses private land, but has a landowner interested in maintaining public motorized use. 2. Trail 413 Matchless Mountain Trail. An historical use trail that is a single track motorcycle use trail leading from near the top of Matchless Mountain on the west to the west side of Taylor Reservoir where it heads north to a crossing of the Taylor River just above Rivers End Campground. Scenic route from a 12,300 foot peak to the Reservoir’s Edge, and ridden almost exclusively downhill. Access to Trail 413 is off of Trail 424, the Gunnison Spur Trail. It provides challenge for advanced riders in a low use area. 3. Trail 424 Spur Trail Connector. Connects from the Dinner Station Campground to Road 753.1. A historically used motorcycle trail. The route provides a continuity of access to the entire Spur Trail System from the Taylor Park Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Recollections of Early Denver
    Personal Recollections of Early Denver .J OSEPII EMERSOX S11nTn* Recollections, like everything else, must have a beginning, and my first memory of early Denver has to do with a Fourth of .July Christmas. It has remained vivid, unforgettable, undoubtedly because of th<:' successive shocks to the sensitive ear drums of a small child. Tt was prior to the Chinese riot of 1880 and the large Chinatown of the city, extending from Sixteenth along vVazee and Vlynkoop streets and directly in the rear of the American House for seYeral blocks, was a busy mart, a growth of the steady immi­ gration of the "Celestials" to Colorado, where thousands had been, and still were, employed in placer mining around Central City, at Fairplay, Tarryall, California Gulch, and other gold camps. Chinatmn1 was their suppl~' source. Here \Yere silk and clothing shops, stores of exotic atmosphere with shelves crowded with im­ ports, fine tea, spices, drugs, and foods from China, tapestries, fans, laces, and there were many laundries. Underground floors were tunnels leading to burrows and the larger rooms where Nepen- 1heized sleepers lay in bunks, the air sticky and sweet with the fumes of opium. 'l'he steam laundry hadn't come, and the Chinese had a monop­ oly on laundering. 'l'o homes all over the city trotted the tireless, affable, pig-tailed little yellow men in their blue-black tunics, flap­ ping trousers and felt white-soled slippers, delivering newspaper­ wrapped bundles. We " ·ere living at Coffield 's ''family boarding house,'' a spacious two-story verandahed frame residence where the Colorado National Bank now stands at Seventeenth and Champa streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulemaking for Colorado Roadless Areas Map 2
    MAP 2 Inventoried Roadless Areas MAP 2 IRA acres 114 Porphyry Peak 3,400 233 Treasure Mountain 20,900 194 115 Puma 8,500 234 Turkey Creek 22,300 193 Platte River Inventoried Roadless Area rounded 116 Purgatoire 13,200 235 West Needle 2,500 Wilderness Names to nearest 207 117 Rampart West 23,700 236 West Needle Wilderness 5,900 4 100 acres ** Map Key ** 24 118 Romley 6,900 237 Williams Creek White Fir Natural Area 500 209 Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 119 Sangre de Cristo 32,600 White River National Forest 187 204 193 Mount 1 Bard Creek 25,400 120 Scraggy Peaks 8,200 238 Adam Mountain 8,200 195 197 21 Major Roads Zirkel 2 Byers Peak 10,100 121 Sheep Rock 2,200 239 Ashcroft 900 Wilderness 210 205 24 76 208 Rawah 10 25 3 Cache La Poudre Adjacent Areas 3,200 122 Silverheels 6,600 240 Assignation Ridge 13,300 Wilderness 9 11 4 Cherokee Park 7,800 123 Spanish Peaks 5,700 241 Baldy Mountain 6,000 Inventoried Roadless Areas 5 3 5 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas 46,000 124 Spanish Peaks- proposed 1,300 242 Basalt Mountain A 14,000 196 5 3 3 5 5 Cache La Poudre 6 Copper Mountain 13,500 125 Square Top Mountain 5,900 243 Basalt Mountain B 7,400 5 3 3 3 214 Wilderness 7 Crosier Mountain 7,200 126 St. Charles Peak 11,600 244 Berry Creek 8,600 National Forest System Wilderness & Comanche Peak 28 200 24 8 Gold Run 6,500 245 Big Ridge To South Fork A 35,300 191 Wilderness 127 Starvation Creek 8,200 19 5 9 Green Ridge - East 26,700 128 Tanner Peak 17,800 246 Big Ridge To South Fork B 6,000 Other Congressionally Designated Lands 24 Fort 19 5 10 Green Ridge
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Canyon & Rock Creek Trails
    Sand Canyon & Rock Creek Trails Canyons of the Ancients National Monument © Kim Gerhardt CANYONS OF THE ANCIENTS NATIONAL MONUMENT Ernest Vallo, Sr. Canyons of the CANYONS Eagle Clan, Pueblo of Acoma: Ancients National OF THE Monument ANCIENTS MAPS & INFORMATION When we come to and the Anasazi a place like Sand Heritage Center Anasazi Heritage Canyon, we pray Center to the ancestral 27501 Highway 184, Hovenweep people. As Indian Dolores, CO 81323 National Monument Canyons people we believe Tel: (970) 882-5600 of the 491 the spirits are Hours: Ancients still here. National Monument 9–5 Summer Mar.- Oct. We ask them Road G for our strength 10–4 Winter Nov.- Feb. and continued https://www.blm.gov/ 160 Mesa Verde survival, and programs/national- 491 National Park thank them conservation-lands/ colorado/canyons-of-the- for sharing their home place. In the Acoma ancients language I say, “Good morning. I’ve brought A public land administered my friends. If we approached in the wrong way, by the Bureau of Land please excuse our ignorance.” Management. 2 Please Stay on Designated Trails Welcome to the Sand Canyon & Rock Creek Trails 3 anyons of the Ancients National Monument was created to protect cultural and Cnatural resources on a landscape scale. It is part of the Bureau of Land Management’s National Landscape Conservation System and includes almost 171,000 acres of public land. The Sand Canyon and Rock Creek Trails are open for hiking, mountain biking, or horseback riding on designated routes only. Most of the Monument is backcountry. Visitors to Canyons of the Ancients are encouraged to start at the Anasazi Heritage Center near Dolores, Mountain Biking Tips David Sanders Colorado, where they can get current information from local rider Dani Gregory: Park Ranger, Canyons of the Ancients: about the Monument and experience the museum’s • Hikers and bikers are supposed to stop for • All it takes is for exhibits, films, and hands-on discovery area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 – 2005 Colorado Directory American Indian Resources
    2004 – 2005 Colorado Directory of American Indian Resources Colorado Commission of Indian Affairs Lieutenant Governor Jane E. Norton, Chair State of Colorado Colorado State Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Avenue, Room 130 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-866-3027 FAX: 303-866-5469 Website: http://www.colorado.gov/ltgovernor/initiatives/indianaffairs.html Dear Citizens of Colorado: Cultures, societies and individuals are all a product of their histories. Legacies shape us; they define our identity. The American Indians in Colorado are a fundamental part of our heritage and, more importantly, their influence is crucial to Colorado’s character today. With this in mind, I am both proud and honored to have a key role in bettering the lives of Colorado’s American Indian community. The Colorado Commission of Indian Affairs is pleased to present the fifth edition of the Colorado Directory of American Indian Resources. The Commission is dedicated to serving with the Ute Mountain Ute and Southern Ute Tribes, as well as the Native American community throughout Colorado. Through educational, occupational, economic, and health–based efforts, the commission aspires to improve the overall quality of life for Colorado’s American Indians while preserving the culture and traditions that are so important to our history. Government–to–government communication has been and will continue to be imperative in achieving this objective. The Commission, in association with the Colorado Legislature and the Rocky Mountain Indian Chamber of Commerce, has already procured funding for the American Indian Scholarship Fund. Native American specialty license plates, the first of their kind in Colorado, finance the fund with the proceeds from their sales.
    [Show full text]