DOCSLIB.ORG

January 1983 SOME SPECIAL FEATURES of the ENDGAME

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 1983 SOME SPECIAL FEATURES of the ENDGAME No. 70 (Vol. V) January 1983 SOME SPECIAL FEATURES OF superior side free to combat the THE ENDGAME STRUGGLE opposing king.) ROOK and KNIGHT against All of the foregoing motives can be 2 KNIGHTs (GBR Class 0107) present as independent ideas in indi- by A.G. Kopnin vidual studies or can be combined in ons study. Kl is out first illustration. The textbooks on the theory of the Here we have the first motive, the endgame pay no attention to this separation of the Bl force, so the first endgame. Therefore, if one is to draw move is obvious. inferences, and make generalisations A.G. Kopnin 1st Prize, Magyar Sakkelet, concerning the special features of the Analytical Section, 1980 struggle with this force, this can be See EG 69, No. 4612 done only from studies composed with this force. From the material imbalance this endgame should be drawn, as the advantage of the exchange is not decisive, but there may be special features of the position that give the stronger side the chance to play for a win. One may list the following features of this kind, very frequently to be found in studies: 1) The separation of the forces of the 1. Sg6. Permanently isolating bSg2. weaker side, permitting the stron- 1. ..., Sd6! this is best. If 1. ..., ger side either to win one of the Sel + 2. Kd2 Sg2 3. Ke2. Or 1. ..., knights, or to exchange a pair of Sa3 2. Re8 + ! Kf5 3. Re2 Sf4 knights to win the resulting rook (Kxg6;) 4. Sxf4 (Rxg2 + ) 4. ..., vs knight position. Kxf4 (K—;) 5. Rb2. Or 1. ..., Sc7 2) The detection of the weaker side's (a7, Kd5) 2. Rf2 Sel + 3. Kd2. king on the edge of the board, 2. Rf2. Not 2. Rfl? Sf5! with a draw. giving grounds for a mating attack. 2 Cpi I 3) The possibility to execute a fork 3. Ke3!*Not 3. Kd2(c3)? Se4+. 3. (double attack). Ke2? Sc2. 3. Kd4? Sb5 + 4. Ke3 4) The possibility of setting up a Sc3! drawing, while if here 4. Kc5 paralysis of both knights of the Sd3 + , or 4. Ke4 Sc3 + 5. Kd4 weaker side. It is the special pecu- (Ke3, Sdl + ; or Kf4, Sd3 + ;) 5. ..., liarity of this endgame that the Sb5+ 6. Kc4 Sd6 + 7. Kd4 Sb5 + king of the stronger side can tie drawn. down, indeed immobilise, both the Now Bl has 2 continuations: 3. ..., opposing knights, while the latter Kd5 (I), and 3. ..., Sc4 + (II), defend one another. (This would since 3. ..., Sf5+ (dS—) 4. Kd2 leave the rook and knight of the wins. 89 K2 A.G. Kopnin I After Black's 7. ..., Ke4 3. ..., Kd5 3. ..., Kd7 4. Rd2! comes to the same thing. 4. Rd2+ Not 4. Re2?Sc4+! 4. ..., Kc5! 4. ..., Ke6 5. Sf4+ Ke7 (Ke5; Rd5 or Kd7; Kf2) 6. Re2 Sc4(f5 + )7. Kf2. 4. ..., Kc6 5. Se5+ Kc5 6. Re2 Kd5(Sf5 + ;Kf2)7. Kf4. 5. Se5 Sc4 + If 5. ..., Sf5+ 6. Kf2. 6. Sxc4 Kxc4 7. Re2 Sd3 Win 8. Rc2 + . Variation I shows the win of the isolated bS. In Variation II 7. ...,Ke4 (Diagram K2) the struggle is more varied, being 8. Rxel + Kxf4 characterised by the typical posi- 9. Re6 Sb5+ 9. ..., Sbl + 10. Kd3 tion K2, K3 and K4. Sa3 ll.Rb6. 10. Kc4 Sa3+ 10. ..., Sc7 11. Re7 II Sa6 12. Rb7. Or 10. ..., Sa7 11. 3. ..., Sc4 + Kc5. Or 10. ..., Kf5 11. Rc6 Sa3 + 4. Kd4 Sa3 4. ..., Sd6 5. Re2+ Kf6 12. Kb4Sbl 13.Rc2. 6. Rxel Sf5 + 7. Ke4 Kxg6 (Sd6 +; 11. Kd3 Sb5 Otherwise 12. Rb6. Kd5 or Sg3 + ; Kf3) 8. Rgl + Kf6 12. Rc6 Kf3 The well known R6ti 9. Rfl. composition has arisen (Tidskrift 4. ..., Sa5 5. Re2 + Kf6 6. Rxel f5r Schack, 1929). Kxg6 7. Rf6 + K—8. Rb6. 13. Kc4 Sa3+ 14. Kc3! Sb5+ 15. 4. ..., Sd2?!? 5. Sh4! Sb3+ (Sbl; Kd3 Kf4. If 15. ..., Kf2 16. Rb6 Re2 + ) 6. Kc4! Scl (Sa5 + ; Kc3) Sc7 17. Ke4 Se8 18. Ke5 Sg7 19. 7. Sg2! eSd3 8. Sf4 + Sxf4 9. Rxf4. Rh6. 16. Kc4 Sa3+ 17. Kd4 5. Sf4 + Kd6 Sb5+ 18. Kd5 Sa3 19. Rcl(c3) 6. Kc3! This leaves Bl with 3 possible Sb5 20. Rc5 Sa3 21. Kd4 Sbl 22. continuations: Kd3 and 23. Ra5. In "a-1" then, a) 6. ..., Ke5; the struggle has switched to the b) 6. ..., eSc2; ending of R against S. c) 6. ..., aSc2; Since 6. ..., Sb5+ 7. Kd2, or 6. ..., Sbl + 7. Kb2, while after 6. A.G. Kopnin ..., Kc5 7. Rfl variations "a-2" After Black's 7. ..., eSc2 and "a-3" arise. a) 6. ..., Ke5 7. Rfl 7. Sg6 + ? Kd5. But now Bl has yet again 3 continuations: a-l)7. ...,Ke4; a-2) 7. ...,eSc2; a-3)7. ...,aSc2; Since 7. ..., Sb5 8. Kd2, or 7. ..., Sbl + 8. Kb2 Sd2 9. Sg6 + K— 10. Rxel. 'a-2" "a-1" 7. ..., eSc2 (Diagram K3) 90 8. Sg6+ Ke4 8. ..., Ke6 9. Rf4 Sal. "a-3" (If now 9. ..., Se3(el) 10. Re4 + 7. ..., aSc2 (Diagram K4) Kf6 11. RxS Kxg6 12. Re6 + K— 8. Sg6+ Ke4 13. Rb6.) 10. Kb2 Sc2 (K—) 11. 9. Rhl! 9. Kd2? Sg2! Rh4 as in the main line method. 9. ..., Ke3 8. ..., Kd6 9. Rf6+ K— 10. Kb3. 10. Se5 Ke2 8. ..., Kd5 9. Rf5 + Ke6 10. Rf4. 11. Sc4 Kf2 11. ..., Kdl 12. Rh2 Kcl 9. Rf4 + Ke3 (Sal; Se3 + , Kcl; Rhl) 13. Rd2 10. Kb2 wK has tied down bSS and Kbl (Kal; Se3) 14. Rdl + Ka2 now the win is attained, either by 15.Rcl. a propitious exchange of Ss, or Or 11. ..., Sal 12. Sa3 and 13. by driving bK to the edge and Kb2. stalemating him -- or by com- 12. Rh2 + Kfl 12. ..., Kg3(gl) 13. bining both methods. Rh8 Kf2 14. Re8. 10. ..., Kd2 12. ..., Kf3 13. Kd2 Ke4 14. Rh5 11. Se5 Kdl 11. ..., Sb5 12. Rf2 + Kf4 (Kd4; Sd6!) 15. Rh8 (main K— 13. Rxc2. 11. ..., Ke3 12. Rf8 line method). (main line method). 13. Rd2 Kgl 12. Rf8 Kd2 12. ..., Sb5 13. Rd8 + 14. Rd8 Kf2 Sd4 14. Sf3. 12. ..., Ke2 13. Rd8 15. Re8 Kf3 (main line method). 16. Kd2 bSS are tied down by wK 13. Rd8+ Ke3 Or 13. ..., Ke2 14. and now it is possible to drive bK Sd3 Ke3 15. Sc5 Ke2 16. Sa4(e4) back to the edge. The method of Ke3(el) 17. Sc3 Kf3(f2) 18. Re8 doing this was discovered by the (main line method). author 28 years ago and written 14. Sc6 Ke2 14. ..., Ke4 15. Sa5 Ke5 up in a short article "Towards 16. Sb3 Ke6(e4) 17. Rc8 Kd7(d3) they Theory of an Endgame" in 18. Rc3( + )K— 19. Sal wins. Shakmaty v SSSR, vi.53. 15. Sa5 Ke3 16. ..., Kf4 16. ...,Kf2 17. Rf8 + . 16. Sb3 Ke2 17. Sd6 Kf3 Or 17. ..., Kg5 18. Rf8. And the "main line method" play 18. Rf8 + Kg3 and the remaining might continue: 17. Sc5 Ke3 18. Kb3 "main line method" moves might Ke2 19. Se4(a4) Ke3(el) 20. Sc3 be 19. Se4+ Kg2 20. Kdl Kgl 21. Kf3(f2) 21. Re8 Kf4 22. Sd5 + Kf3 Sc3(g3) Kg2 22. Se2 Kh3 23. Rg8 23. Kb2 Kf2 24. Sf4 Kg3 25. Sd3 Kf3 Kh2 24. Sf4 Khl 25. Sh3 Kh2 26. 26. Kb3 Kg3(g4) 27. Rb8! This is Sf2. bK is stalemated, and one bS simpler and quicker than restricting is lost! bK to the h-file. 27. ..., Kf3 28. Sb4 Sxb4 29. Rxb4 Sbl 30. Kc2. b) 6. ..., eSc2 7. Kb3 Ke5 8. Sg6+ Kd4 K4 A.G. Kopnin After Black's 7. ..., aSc2 9. Rf8 Kd3 10. Rd8+ Ke2 11. Kb2 (see variation "a-2"). c) 6. ..., aSc2 7. Kd2 Ke5 8. Sg6 + Ke4 9. Rf8, as in variation "a-3". The specification of tying down bSS by wK does not always reap an advantage leading to a win. In particular, when this takes place in 91 the centre of the board then the result K6 is an example of this. The may be drawn. K5 is an example author's solution runs: 1. Rc5 aSc4 2. where we have been unable to find a Sf5 Kg6 3. Ke6 Kh7 4. Rc7+ Kg8 5. win, because here the drive of bK to Se7+ Kf8 6. Sd5 Kg8 7. Sf6+ Kf8 8. the edge is unsuccessful, nor does it Ra7. We may note that not only 8. lead to the advantageous exchange of Ra7 wins, but equally 8. Rh7 and 8. a pair of Ss. (Readers are invited Kd5. If, in this line, 2. ..., Kg8 3. Ke6 either to be convinced of this or to Kh8 4. Rc7 Kg8 5. Se7+ wins. Or if refute the author's assertion.) 2. ..., Sg6+ 3. Kf6 cSe5 4. Rc7 + Kg8 5. Sh6+ Kh8 6. Kf5. K5 A.G. Kopnin (Original?7 The composer's solution has duals (a partially incorrect solution), arising out of the possibility of an advan- tageous exchange of a pair of Ss. After 1. Rc5 aSc4 one should lay the immediate 2. Ke6! Kg6 (K else; Sc6, Sxc6; Rxc4!) 3. Sf5 Kh7 (Kg5(h5); Sd6!) 4. Se7 Kg7(h6,h8) 5. Sc6 Sxc6 6. Rxc4! This idea of a partial second solu- tion leads us to a complete cook: 1. Draw Ke6 Sd3. If 1. ..., a(e)Sc4 2. Rc5 Kg6 3. Sf5 Kh7 4. Se7 Kg7 5. Sc6. Or 1. It is worth pointing out that studies ..., Sg4 2. Rc5 Sb7 3. Rc7. Or 1. ..., with this force set themselves apart Sg6 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clarice Benini Omaggio Alla Campionessa Di Scacchi
    Alessandra Innocenti & Lorenzo Barsi Clarice Benini Omaggio alla Campionessa di Scacchi Il Delta della Luna Associazione Culturale CLARICE B ENINI 2 Alessandra Innocenti & Lorenzo Barsi Clarice Benini Omaggio alla Campionessa di Scacchi Copyright © 1999-2011 Alessandra Innocenti & Lorenzo Barsi. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation, with Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts, and Back-Cover Texts. Il presente libro è un progetto aperto e di pubblico dominio. Ringraziamo per l’aiuto Mauro Berni, Renzo Cambi†, Mirsad Crnic, Renato Di Vincenzi†, Jan Kalendovský, Mario Leoncini, Giovanni Lucci, Janet L. Newton, Massimiliano Orsi, Claudio Sericano e Zdenek Zavodny. Alessandra & Lorenzo [email protected] Il Delta della Luna Associazione Culturale CLARICE B ENINI 3 Indice Introduzione............................................................................................................................................................................6 G. Benini–A. Reggio....................................................................................................................................6 La terrazza di Vienna......................................................................................................................................................10 K. Farago–S. Graf......................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • No. 26 Vol. II October 1971 Engineer PAUL FARAGO
    No. 26 Vol. II October 1971 Engineer PAUL FARAGO - Honoured Master of Sport is not longer among .us On 1.x11.70 the news of the death of Engineer Paul Farago saddened all those who had known and admired him for his profound and original studies - studies which for three decades brought his country famous successes in important international competitions . This was a great loss for Romanian chess ; it was Paul Fara o who lifted Romanian problemi sts to unexpected heights, who discovered new ways of enriching traditional methods especially' by strengthening Black's play so that points of great subtlety were ~ntroduced. Born in Hungary in the village of Perag on 4.iv.1886, he graduated from the high school in Kecskem et and, the Polytechnic ' m Budapest as a geodetic engineer and settled down m CluJ, Romania m 1910. It was at Clu'~ that I made his acquaintance, four decades later, when as a young study-composer I had the opportunity of visiting him and all those who had known and admired him for his profound and learning something from the craftsmanship of this materS who m I greatly admired . Since then I visited him as often as I could, and the first thing I learned was that a good ending is the realization o f an original idea, aesthetic and profound, m an economic position, with a solution rich in points and surprises . ." His first study was published m 1899, at the age of 13 . After several smaller successes (2nd prize 'm the International Competition of the Romanian Chess Review in 1935 and 1st prize, 'm theesame year m the competition organized in memory of W .
    [Show full text]
  • Biblioteca Nazionale Braidense REGISTRO TOPOGRAFICO Sezione:SCACCHI. Da Collocazione
    Biblioteca Nazionale Braidense REGISTRO TOPOGRAFICO Sezione:SCACCHI. Da collocazione: A collocazione: Biblioteca Nazionale Braidense 31/01/2014 2 REGISTRO TOPOGRAFICO relativo alla sezione: SCACCHI. Collocazione: C. Specificazione: 0003 Inventari: 1 Consistenza di collocazione: 1 V. *Šachy : 2000let djin hry / Roswin Finkenzeller, Wilhelm Ziehr, Emil M. Bührer. - Praha : Nakladatelství Slovart, ©1998 ( Pioltello : Rotolito Lombarda). - 208 p. : ill. ; 31 cm. N. 1036536 Collocazione: C. Specificazione: 0256 Inventari: 1 Consistenza di collocazione: v 1 *Karpov-Kasparov : la seconda sfida / Sergio Mariotti. - Roma : Prisma, 1986. - 68 p. : ill. ; 21 cm. N. 777993 Collocazione: E. Specificazione: 0001 Inventari: 1 Consistenza di collocazione: 1v *Osservazioni teorico-pratiche sopra il giuoco degli scacchi, ossia Il giuoco degli scacchi esposto. - In Bologna : nella stamperia di S. Tommaso d'Aquino, 1763 N. 270290 Collocazione: F. Specificazione: 0002 Inventari: 1 Consistenza di collocazione: 1(1925)-1939 L'*echiquier : *revue internationale d'echecs. - 1(1925)- . - Bruxelles : [s.n.], 1925- . - v. N. PER346413 Biblioteca Nazionale Braidense 31/01/2014 3 REGISTRO TOPOGRAFICO relativo alla sezione: SCACCHI. Collocazione: F. Specificazione: 0003 Inventari: 14 Consistenza di collocazione: 1(1981)-11(1993)- *Scacchi e scienze applicate : una rivista internazionale. - A. 1, n. 1 (1981)- . - Venezia : A. Carminati, \1981!-. - v. : ill. ; 31 cm. ((Periodicità non determinata N. 807259 *Scacchi e scienze applicate : una rivista internazionale. - A. 1, n. 1 (1981)- . - Venezia : A. Carminati, \1981!-. - v. : ill. ; 31 cm. ((Periodicità non determinata N. 1159105 *Scacchi e scienze applicate : una rivista internazionale. - A. 1, n. 1 (1981)- . - Venezia : A. Carminati, \1981!-. - v. : ill. ; 31 cm. ((Periodicità non determinata N. 1159110 *Scacchi e scienze applicate : una rivista internazionale. - A.
    [Show full text]
  • David Delucia Collection Highlights of the Chess Library Autographs
    David DeLucia Collection Highlights of the Chess Library Autographs and Ephemera Agnel: Two-page ALS from H.R. Agnel to E.B. Cook. Oct. 27, 1857. Alapin: Two ALS. Alapin: Postcard written to Ranneforth. Alapin: Picture postcard of participants from Wien 1898. Written and signed by S. Alapin. Albin: Albin's Schach-Aphorismen und Reminiscenzen. Hannover, 1899, inscribed. Alekhine: 30 ALS (autographed letter signed). Always a favorite among collectors. Whether it be a simple signature, signed card, book, photo or letter, demand for Alekhine has always been strong and desirability high. Alekhine: 15 TLS (typed letter signed). Alekhine: 1927 WCC album with six typed game scores (Alekhine wins), all signed. A fine blue leather album containing: six typed game scores (Alekhine’s victories) all on the 1927 World Chess Championship stationery, each signed by Alekhine; signed picture photo of Alekhine; two ALS by Alekhine; ALS by Capablanca and; one drawn game score, written by a scribe on the 1927 World Chess Championship stationery and signed by both players. One of my favorite items in the collection. Alekhine: New York 1924 tournament book, signed. Alekhine: Nottingham 1936 tournament book, signed. Alekhine: My Best Games, 1908-23, inscribed. Alekhine: Auf dem Wege zur Weltmeisterschaft (1923-1927), inscribed. Alekhine: Das New Yorker Schachturnier. 1928. Inscribed. Alekhine: Four volumes, two with his hand-writing, from his library. I purchased a copy of Internationale Kaiser Jubiläums Schach Turnier, Wien 1898, from Stuart Wagman’s estate in Italy. I found Stuart’s writing on the Foreword, “This is Alekhine’s copy, purchased by me at Brentano’s in Paris, April 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Theorists in the Field of Chess Study Composing Have Always Considered the Following Article Hy the Famous Russian Composer A
    No. 11 January 1968 TROITZKY'S 1910 ARTICLE by J. Selman, Scheveningen (Holland) Introduction: Russian theorists in the field of chess study composing have always considered the following article hy the famous Russian composer A. A. Troitzky (1866-1942) to be the very base of to-day's "chess study theory". The article has, for example, often been cited and quoted by the well-known author A. O. Herbstman in his pioneer books, e.g. "Sjachmati Etjud v SSSR". It is therefore surprising that this article, written in 1910(!), has never been published in full outside Russia. Probably the reasons for this are that the article in question was published in the chess column of a rather obscure periodical, at least outside Russia, and that is has never been reprinted in the Russian periodicals specially dedicated to chess. Fifty-seven years have gone by since Troitzky wrote the article and Znosko-Borowski had it published in his new chess column in the periodical "Niva". Therefore it goes without saying that the article has to be read and evaluated in the light of chess history and must mainly be considered as an interesting "museum piece". However, many observations made by Troitzky so long ago are still valid, and even of importance, for the chess study world to-day. For more than 30 years I have tried from time to time to obtain a copy of Troitzky's article, but all my efforts in this direction were in vain, so that I finally came to believe that it was classified in Moscow as a "state secret" and was guarded as such! However, last year - as a result of the co-operation and help of the Grandmasters Prof.
    [Show full text]