Chief Officer's Manual for the National Medal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
12A Canadian Polar Medal 2021.Pdf
Canadian Polar Medal 01 June 2021 TERMS The Polar Medal will recognize those who have contributed to or endeavoured to promote a greater understanding of Canada’s Northern communities and its people. It will also honour those individuals who have withstood the rigours of the polar climate to make significant contributions to polar exploration and knowledge, scientific research, and the securement of Canada’s Northern sovereignty. Any person or group will be able to submit a nomination of a person who is eligible to be awarded the Polar Medal. Submissions will be accepted throughout the year. Nominations will be received by the Chancellery of Honours and reviewed by an advisory committee, which will make recommendations to the governor general. BARS Each subsequent award of the Medal to the same person will be indicated by a bar, which will be in silver with raised edges and bear a centred silver maple leaf. DESCRIPTION A silver octagonal medal that is 36-mm in diameter. The edge of the obverse is decorated with small denticles. OBVERSE The obverse depicts a contemporary crowned effigy of the Sovereign, circumscribed with the inscription in capital letters of the Canadian Royal Title (left side maple leaf with ELIZABETH II DEI; right side GRATIA REGINA with a maple leaf following and the word “CANADA” at the bottom). EIIR medal is an older crowned Elizabeth II facing right. REVERSE The reverse bears a representation of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police schooner St. Roch depicted in the Arctic near a tall iceberg and two crew members standing on the ice. -
Hulse and the Department of Defence Re: Jensen [2020] DHAAT 15 (27 August 2020)
Hulse and the Department of Defence re: Jensen [2020] DHAAT 15 (27 August 2020) File Number(s) 2019/018 Re Lieutenant Colonel G.L. Hulse (Retd) on behalf of Lieutenant Colonel A.H. Jensen (Retd) Applicant And The Department of Defence Respondent Tribunal Mr M. Sullivan, AO (Presiding Member) Brigadier M. Bornholt, AM (Retd) Mr G. Mowbray Hearing Date 18 June 2020 DECISION On 27 August 2020, having reviewed the decision by the Chief of the Army of 30 October 2019 to not support the award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Lieutenant A.H. Jensen for his actions on 13 May 1968, the Tribunal decided to recommend to the Minister for Defence Personnel that he recommend to the Governor-General that Lieutenant A.H. Jensen be awarded the Medal for Gallantry for acts of gallantry in action in hazardous circumstances as the officer commanding the 1st Battalion, the Royal Australian Regiment’s mortar line during the Battle for Fire Support Base Coral in Vietnam on 13 May 1968. CATCHWORDS DEFENCE HONOUR – Distinguished Service Decorations – Distinguished Service Cross – Gallantry Decorations – Medal for Gallantry - eligibility criteria – 1st Battalion, the Royal Australian Regiment – Fire Support Base Coral – Mortar Platoon - South Vietnam LEGISLATION Defence Act 1903 – ss 110T, 110V (1), 110VA, 110VB (1) Defence Regulation 2016 – Part 6, S35, Defence Honours, Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. S25 dated 4 February 1991, Distinguished Service Decorations Regulations Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. S25 dated 4 February 1991, Gallantry Decorations Regulations Page | 2 REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction 1. The Applicant, Lieutenant Colonel G.L. Hulse, (Retd) seeks review of a decision by the Chief of Army to not support the retrospective award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Lieutenant Colonel A.H. -
1 the Crown and Honours
The Crown and Honours: Getting it Right Christopher McCreery I N T R O D U C T I O N In the words of that early scholar of Commonwealth autonomy, Sir Arthur Berridale Keith, “The Crown is the fount of all honour.”i The role of the Crown as the fount of all official honours in Canada is a precept that is as old and constant as is the place of the Crown in our constitutional structure. Since the days of King Louis XIV residents of Canada have been honoured by the Crown for their services with a variety of orders, decorations and medals. The position of the Crown in the modern Canadian honours system is something that is firmly entrenched, despite consistent attempts to marginalize it in recent years. Indeed honours are not something separate from the Crown, they are an integral element of the Crown. A part that affords individuals with official recognition for what are deemed as good works, or in the modern context, exemplary citizenship. Just last year we witnessed the Queen’s direct involvement in the honours system when she appointed Jean Chrétien as a member of the Order of Merit. While many commentators and officials in Canada seemed confused as to just what this honour is – the highest civil honour for service – people did realize how significant it was, in large part because it came not from a committee or politician, but directly from the Sovereign. With this paper I will delve into the central role the Crown and Sovereign play in the creation of honours and I will also explore the areas where attention and reform are required in the Canadian honours system. -
Annual Report Erall Incidence and Impact of Additional Information About Victoria Police May Be Departments REGION 1 (CENTRAL)
2005-06 Additional Information Contact Details Regional Headquarters > > > > annual report erall incidence and impact of Additional information about Victoria Police may be Departments REGION 1 (CENTRAL) obtained from our website: Chief Commissioner’s Office Victoria Police Centre the eighbourhoods and improving en ableto build even further on our www.police.vic.gov.au Business and Information Services 637 Flinders Street sult in 2004-05.This means that the Business Management Melbourne Victoria 3005 nce 2000-01. This means that the total Victoria Police Annual Report 2005-06 Victoria The Financial Management Act requires that certain Corporate Strategy & Performance Telephone 9247 5688 categories of information not contained in the Annual Ethical Standards Report be available on request. Human Resources REGION 2 (WEST) These include: Traffic and Transport 110 Mercer Street Geelong Victoria 3220 • Details of major research and developmental activities; These Departments are located at: Telephone 5225 3222 • Statements of details of changes in prices, fees, charges and levies; and Victoria Police Centre REGION 3 (NORTH WEST) • Major committees sponsored; 637 Flinders Street 15 Dimboola Road (PO Box 415) Broadmeadows Victoria 3047 Further information may be obtained by writing to: Melbourne Victoria 3005 Telephone 9247 6666 REGION 4 (NORTH EAST) Chief Commissioner 247 – 249 Rosanna Road Victoria Police Education Department is located at: Rosanna Victoria 3084 PO Box 415 Telephone 9457 4444 Melbourne Vic 3005. Victoria Police Academy View -
Inquiry Into Recognition of Service with the Commonwealth Monitoring Force – Rhodesia 1979-80
INQUIRY INTO RECOGNITION OF SERVICE WITH THE COMMONWEALTH MONITORING FORCE – RHODESIA 1979-80 LETTER OF TRANSMISSION Inquiry into Recognition of Service with the Commonwealth Monitoring Force – Rhodesia 1979-80 Senator the Hon David Feeney Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Parliamentary Secretary, I am pleased to present the report of the Defence Honours and Awards Tribunal on the Inquiry into Recognition of Service with the Commonwealth Monitoring Force – Rhodesia 1979-80. The inquiry was conducted in accordance with the Terms of Reference. The panel of the Tribunal that conducted the inquiry arrived unanimously at the findings and recommendations set out in its report. Yours sincerely Professor Dennis Pearce AO Chair 8 November 2010 2 CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMISSION.............................................................................................2 CONTENTS..............................................................................................................................3 TERMS OF REFERENCE .....................................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................5 RECOMMENDATION...........................................................................................................6 REPORT OF THE TRIBUNAL.............................................................................................7 Conduct of the Inquiry....................................................................................................7 -
Sacrifice and Recognition
Absolutely spot on! This deserves the widest possible support IMHO Subject: Sacrifice and Recognition Hi All, Just posted a question to Libby Trickett nee Lenton at the Daily Telegraph website live blog. 1:08[Comment From Ray] G'day Libby. Do you think it's appropriate that first time Olympic gold medal winners are awarded the Order of Australia Medal (OAM) given most are in their late teens/early twenties? 1:10 Hi Ray. I think they are definitely deserving, even though are so young they have worked very hard to achieve their amazing results. Just because they are young, does not mean they are not deserving. The youngest OAM Olympian is 18. Questions sent to the Honours and Awards people at the Governor Generals office on the 4th April are still yet to be answered. Now read on. Yours Sincerely Ray Brown National President Injured Service Persons Association (Peacetime Injuries) Www.ispa.asn.au (02) 9833 8485 043 833 8486 ISPA PO Box 1164 St Marys NSW 2760 We Served - We Gave - We Care True Sacrifice and Recognition There is no greater sacrifice than that where a man or woman gives his or her life for their country. A little over 102,000 Australian men and women have done just that in war, peacekeeping and peacetime service. Training for war is not without its costs with over 550 men and women paying the ultimate price in the ongoing service of this country. This is not done for personal gain and accolades or in competition to beat others to become the best. -
The Order of Military Merit to Corporal R
Chapter Three The Order Comes to Life: Appointments, Refinements and Change His Excellency has asked me to write to inform you that, with the approval of The Queen, Sovereign of the Order, he has appointed you a Member. Esmond Butler, Secretary General of the Order of Military Merit to Corporal R. L. Mailloux, I 3 December 1972 nlike the Order of Canada, which underwent a significant structural change five years after being established, the changes made to the Order of Military U Merit since 1972 have been largely administrative. Following the Order of Canada structure and general ethos has served the Order of Military Merit well. Other developments, such as the change in insignia worn on undress ribbons, the adoption of a motto for the Order and the creation of the Order of Military Merit paperweight, are examined in Chapter Four. With the ink on the Letters Patent and Constitution of the Order dry, The Queen and Prime Minister having signed in the appropriate places, and the Great Seal affixed thereunto, the Order had come into being, but not to life. In the beginning, the Order consisted of the Sovereign and two members: the Governor General as Chancellor and a Commander of the Order, and the Chief of the Defence Staff as Principal Commander and a similarly newly minted Commander of the Order. The first act of Governor General Roland Michener as Chancellor of the Order was to appoint his Secretary, Esmond Butler, to serve "as a member of the Advisory Committee of the Order." 127 Butler would continue to play a significant role in the early development of the Order, along with future Chief of the Defence Staff General Jacques A. -
Report of the Inquiry Into Service in Peacekeeping Operations Post 1947
INQUIRY INTO RECOGNITION FOR DEFENCE FORCE PERSONNEL WHO SERVED AS PEACEKEEPERS FROM 1947 ONWARDS LETTER OF TRANSMISSION Inquiry into recognition for Defence Force personnel who served as peacekeepers from 1947 onwards Senator the Hon David Feeney Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Parliamentary Secretary, I am pleased to present the report of the Defence Honours and Awards Tribunal on the Inquiry into recognition for Defence Force personnel who served as peacekeepers from 1947 onwards. The inquiry was conducted in accordance with the Terms of Reference. The panel of the Tribunal that conducted the inquiry arrived unanimously at the findings and recommendations set out in its report. Yours sincerely Professor Dennis Pearce AO Chair 1 November 2010 2 CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMISSION.....................................................................................2 CONTENTS......................................................................................................................3 TERMS OF REFERENCE .............................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................5 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................7 REPORT OF THE TRIBUNAL.....................................................................................8 Conduct of the Inquiry ................................................................................................8 -
Gilchrist and Street and the Department of Defence [2017] DHAAT 016 (20 July 2017)
Gilchrist and Street and the Department of Defence [2017] DHAAT 016 (20 July 2017) File Number(s) 2015/044, 2015/045 Re Captain A. Gilchrist, DSM and Sergeant A. Street Applicants And The Department of Defence Respondent Tribunal Mr G. Mowbray, (Presiding Member) Brigadier M.D. Bornholt, AM (Retd) Brigadier K.J. O’Brien, CSC (Retd) Hearing Date 31 May 2017 DECISION On 20 July 2017, the Tribunal recommended to the Minister: a. that the decision by the Chief of Army to refuse to recommend a gallantry award for Captain Anthony Gilchrist, DSM for his actions during his tour of Iraq with the Combined Explosive Exploitation Cell in 2005 be affirmed; and b. that the decision by the Chief of Army to refuse to recommend a gallantry award for Sergeant Andrew Street for his actions during his tour of Iraq with the Combined Explosive Exploitation Cell in 2005 be affirmed. CATCHWORDS DEFENCE HONOUR – Distinguished Service Decorations – Gallantry Decorations – Iraq - Combined Explosive Exploitation Cell – Improvised Explosive Device LEGISLATION Defence Act 1903 – ss 110V(1), 110VA, and 110VB(1), (6) Defence Force Regulations 1952 – Reg 93B Sch 3 Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. S25, Gallantry Decorations Regulations and Distinguished Service Decorations Regulations dated 4 February 1991 REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction 1. On 21 February 2011, the Government requested that the Tribunal inquire into and report on unresolved recognition for past acts of naval and military gallantry and valour (the Valour Inquiry). As part of the Terms of Reference for the Inquiry, the Tribunal was directed to receive submissions from the public supporting recognition for those they thought worthy of higher recognition. -
Newsletter [email protected] Issue No
Defence Plaza Sydney Royal United Services Institute for Locked Bag 18, Darlinghurst NSW1 2010 Defence and Security Studies NSW, Inc Level 20, 270 Pit Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 www.rusinsw.org.au Newsletter [email protected] Issue No. 27 - 23 January 2017 Telephone: (02) 9393 2325 Fax: (02) 9393 3543 Introduction Welcome to this month’s issue of the electronic newsletter of the Institute, the aim of which is to provide members, stakeholders, and other interested parties up to date news of our latest activities and events as well as selective information on defence issues. There is no charge to receive this newsletter electronically and recipients are not required to be a member of the Institute. Invite your colleagues to receive this newsletter by going to the newsletter page on the Institute’s website http://www.rusinsw.org.au/Newsletter where they can register their email contact details. Latest News – As the Department of Defence has not been very active with news items over the holiday period our news section in this newsletter is limited. Australia and France sign Future Submarine Inter-Governmental Agreement On 20 December 2016 Australia’s Minister for Defence, Senator the Hon Marise Payne and France’s Minister of Defence, Mr Jean-Yves Le Drian, signed an Agreement on Australia’s Future Submarine Program. The agreement establishes the framework between the Governments of Australia and France required for the development of the Royal Australian Navy’s new fleet Following the signing of the Framework Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the French Republic Concerning Cooperation on the of submarines. -
Australian Government Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal
Australian Government Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal - and the Department of Defence [2017] DHAAT 001 (10 January 2017) File Number(s) 2015/042 Re Major Applicant And The Australian Army on behalf of the Department of Defence Respondent Tribunal Mr Mark Sullivan, AO (Presiding Member) Brigadier Mark Bornholt, AM (Retd) The Hon Peter Lindsay, OAM Hearing Date 8 December 2016 DECISION On 10 January 201 7 the Tribunal decided to recommend to th~ Minister that the decision by the Chief ~ further action be taken to seek additional recognition for Major - for his service with the Australian Army Training Team Vietnam in 1970-71 be affirmed. CATCHWORDS DEFENCE HONOUR- Foreign Awards -AATTV - US Bronze Star__,_ Military Medal - Gallantry Decorations - Vietnam LEGISLATION Defence Act 1903 -ss llOV(l), 1 lOVA, and llOVB(l) Defence Force Regulations 1952-Reg 93B Sch 3 Commonwealth ofAustralia Gazette No. S25 Gallantry Decorations Regulations dated 4 February 1991 REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction 1. The applicant, Major seeks review of a decision by the Chief of Army (CA) that no further action be taken to seek additional recognition for his service with the Australian Army Training Team Vietnam 1 (AATTV) in 1970-71. Major - was awarded the United States Bronze Star Medal for Valour with V Device (the Bronze Star) and seeks that this award be considered 'at the Military Medal (MM) level'. 2. On 9 November 2008, Major - e-mailed the Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Support (the Parliamentary Secretary) seeking Government investigation of the possibility of awarding equivalent Australian medals to soldiers who were awarded foreign gallantry medals for their service in Vietnam. -
Report of the Inquiry Into Recognition for Service in Somalia
INQUIRY INTO RECOGNITION OF AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE SERVICE IN SOMALIA BETWEEN 1992 AND 1995 LETTER OF TRANSMISSION Inquiry into Recognition of Australian Defence Force Service in Somalia between 1992 and 1995 Senator, the Hon John Faulkner Minister for Defence Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Senator Faulkner, I am pleased to present the report of the Defence Honours and Awards Tribunal on the Inquiry into recognition of ADF Service in Somalia between 1992 and 1995. The inquiry was conducted in accordance with the Terms of Reference. The panel of the Tribunal that conducted the inquiry arrived unanimously at the findings and recommendations set out in its report. Yours sincerely Professor Dennis Pearce AO Chair 5 July 2010 CONTENTS 2 LETTER OF TRANSMISSION.............................................................................................2 TERMS OF REFERENCE .....................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................6 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................8 REPORT OF THE TRIBUNAL.............................................................................................9 Members of the Tribunal ................................................................................................9 Declaration of Conflict of Interest ..................................................................................9