2013 LR343 Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												  The FCC's Knowledge Problem: How to Protect Consumers OnlineThe FCC’s Knowledge Problem: How to Protect Consumers Online Hon. Maureen K. Ohlhausen* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. A FRAMEWORK FOR THINKING ABOUT REGULATION: COMPARING THE FCC AND THE FTC .................................................................. 205 A. The Regulator’s Knowledge Problem....................................... 206 B. The FCC’s Prescriptive, Ex Ante Regulatory Approach .......... 208 C. The FTC’s Flexible, Ex Post Enforcement-Based Approach ... 212 II. NET NEUTRALITY AND THE FCC: A CASE STUDY IN REGULATORY DIFFICULTY ..................................................................................... 214 A. What is Net Neutrality? ............................................................ 215 1. Proponents of Net Neutrality Regulation .......................... 215 2. Opponents of Net Neutrality Regulation .......................... 216 B. The FCC’s History of Broadband Regulation: The Road to Reclassification ........................................................................ 218 1. Broadband as a Title I information service ....................... 218 2. The Verizon Decision ........................................................ 220 3. The Aftermath of Verizon ................................................. 221 Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission. I would like to thank Neil Chilson for his contributions to this essay. The views expressed here are solely my own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or any other individual Commissioner. Portions of this essay were adapted from a keynote
- 
												  Notice of 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementNotice of 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement THE TIMKEN COMPANY Canton, Ohio U.S.A. 1300100_1_64sc.pdf 2 3/14/13 5:01 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Chairman’s Letter ……………………………………………………………………………….… 2 Notice of Annual Meeting ………………………………………………………………………... 3 Proxy Statement ………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Election of Directors ………………………………………………………………………… 5 Election of Directors (Item No. 1) ………………………………………..……………. 5 Nominees ………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Director Compensation ………………………………….………………………………….. 11 2012 Director Compensation Table………………………………………………………… 12 Board Leadership Structure ………………………………………………………………... 13 Risk Oversight ……………………………………………………………………………….. 13 Audit Committee ……………………………………………………………………………... 14 Audit Committee Report ………………………………………………………………..…… 14 Compensation Committee ………………………………………………………………….. 14 Compensation Committee Report ……………………………………………………….… 15 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ………………………………….…. 16 Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock ………………………………………………….. 17 Compensation Discussion and Analysis ……………………………………….……….… 20 Executive Compensation …………………………………………………………….…..…. 32 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors (Item No. 2) ……………………... 44 Auditors ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 45 Shareholder Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation (Item No. 3).. 45 Amendments to the Company’s Amended Articles of Incorporation to Reduce Certain Shareholder Voting Requirements (Item No. 4)……………………………….… 46 Amendments to the Company’s Amended
- 
												  The Information Age Was Born InINDUSTRY CLUSTERS NUMBERNumber OF HIGH of TECHAdvanced INDUSTRY Services BUSINESSES Businesses HIGH TECH THE INFORMATION AGE WAS BORN IN DFW 75 In 1958, Dallas led the nation into the new 1 17 88 35E 1 60 760 121 era of information and communication TOP SEMICONDUCTOR & SEMICONDUCTOR TOP COMPUTER SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE MACHINERY MANUFACTURERS WITH COMPANIES WITH OPERATIONS IN DFW technologies with Nobel Laureate Jack 35W OPERATIONS IN DFW Kilby’s invention of the microchip at Texas Accenture [Irving] Creation Technologies [Plano] Instruments. This invention allowed Capgemini [Dallas] Maxim Integrated Products [Dallas] Cognizant [Irving] the development of laptop computers, Texas Instruments [Dallas, Plano, Richardson] Computer Sciences Corp [Irving] smartphones, and space travel. | Qorvo [Richardson] HP Enterprise Services [Plano] 190 The DFW technology industry IBM [Dallas] HIGH TECHHIGH encompasses four general categories: Infosys [Plano] manufacturing, information services, TOP FABLESS SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANIES WITH OPERATIONS IN DFW L-3 Communications [Rockwall] professional technical services, and bio-life Diodes Inc. [Plano] Microsoft [Irving] sciences. The region’s activity in key emerging Micron Technology [Allen] NTT Data [Plano] technologies such as next generation wireless Qorvo [Richardson] Oracle [Dallas] 30 and broadband communications, artifi cial STMicroelectronics [Coppell] Raytheon [Garland, McKinney] 635 intelligence, and virtual reality as well as RealPage [Richardson] 820 183 medical, bio, and life sciences, is gaining SAP AG [Irving] TOP TELECOM COMPANIES Siemens PLM Software [Plano] increasing national recognition. WITH OPERATIONS IN DFW 360 AT&T [Dallas] TEKsystems [Irving] 30 BT Global Services [Dallas] Trend Micro NA [Irving] Xerox [Dallas] 12 TH Cisco Systems [Richardson] 20 THE 7 LARGEST CONCENTRATION OF Ericsson [Plano] HIGHTECH JOBS IN THE U.S.
- 
												  Docket No. 16-0066 Dex Media, Inc. Exhibit 1Docket No. 16-0066 Dex Media, Inc. Exhibit 1 CORRECTED TESTIMONY OF JERONIMOS “MIKE” KONIDARIS DEX MEDIA, INC. IN THE MATTER OF DEX MEDIA, INC., as agent for ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO., and as agent for FRONTIER NORTH, INC., FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF THE CAROLINAS, LLC, CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF ILLINOIS D/B/A FRONTIER CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS OF ILLINOIS, FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS – MIDLAND, INC., FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS – PRAIRIE, INC., FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS – SCHUYLER, INC., FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPUE, INC., FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ILLINOIS, INC., FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF LAKESIDE, INC., FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF MT. PULASKI, INC., and FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ORION, INC. PETITION FOR WAIVERS OF SECTIONS 732.50(a) and (c), 735.180(a)(1), 735.180(d), and 735.180(1), and Section 756.110 of Title 83 of the Administrative Code. Docket No. 16-0066 February 8, 2016 Docket No. 16-0066 Dex Media, Inc. Exhibit 1 1 Witness Information & Introduction 2 Q: Please state your full name and business address. 3 A: Jeronimos (“Mike”) Konidaris 4 2200 West Airfield Drive 5 P.O. Box 619810 6 DFW Airport, TX 75261 7 Q: By whom are you employed and in what capacity? 8 A: I am the Director of Telco Relations, Listing Acquisition and Print Services of Dex 9 Media, Inc., the successor to Dex One Corporation. 10 Q: Describe Dex Media’s involvement in the business of publishing telephone 11 directories. 12 A: Dex Media and its predecessors and affiliates have been in the business of publishing 13 telephone directories since 1886. Dex Media and affiliate companies are successors to the 14 publishing arms of a number of local exchange carriers (“LECs”), including AT&T 15 Illinois and Frontier in Illinois.
- 
												  Supplier Name State City Postal Code CountrySUPPLIER NAME STATE CITY POSTAL CODE COUNTRY STREET ADDRESS 1 TAX ID # or D&B Number Spend CHECK 158 NORTH IL JOLIET 60432 USA 158 N CHICAGO STREET 20-3110126 280.55 22ND CENTURY MEDIA IL ORLAND PARK 60467 USA 11516 W. 183RD ST. UNIT SW 20-1981583 2704 24/7 SECURED BOARD-UP IL JOLIET 60435 USA 2364 ESSINGTON RD, STE 264 27-0384206 2450 3M MN ST PAUL 55133-3225 USA 3M CENTER BLDG. 225-58-08 41-0417775 100 7/10 THE NEWS JOURNAL CREDIT R IL CHICAGO 60603 USA 115 S. LASALLE 12TH FLR WEST 13-4941092 20 7/12 US1.00 HO INTERNT CREDIT IL CHICAGO 60603 USA 115 S. LASALLE 12TH FLR WEST 13-4941092 -0.07 7/16 ERROR CORRECTION IL CHICAGO 60603 USA 115 S. LASALLE 12TH FLR WEST 13-4941092 0.07 9-1-1 PUBLIC EDUCATOR'S OF TX (blank) (blank) (blank) USA OF TEXAS 75-6049012 30 A BEEP, LLC IL JOLIET 60432 USA 452 N. CHICAGO STREET 36-4087404 847.95 A BETTER LIMOUSINE SER IL CHICAGO 60603 USA 115 S. LASALLE 12TH FLR WEST 13-4941092 252 A CORPORATE PRINTIN IL CHICAGO 60603 USA 115 S. LASALLE 12TH FLR WEST 13-4941092 10833.69 A CORPORATE PRINTING SRVCE INC IL WOODRIDGE 60517 USA 6808 HOBSON VALLEY DR UNIT 101 36-3749546 7104.7 A EAGLE OUTFTR IL CHICAGO 60603 USA 115 S. LASALLE 12TH FLR WEST 13-4941092 335 A FOLDING MACHINE SERVICE, INC IL GILBERTS 60136 USA P.O. BOX 194 36-3775093 232.85 A KIDS KITCHEN IL CHICAGO 60603 USA 115 S.
- 
												  Questions from FCC Letter to AT&T Re: Google VoiceRobert W. Quinn, Jr. AT&T Services, Inc. Senior Vice President 1120 20th St. NW, Suite 1000 ~at&t Federal Regulatory Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone 202 457-3851 Fax 832 213-0243 September 25, 2009 Sharon Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington DC 20554 Re: Google Voice; Establishing Just and Reasonable Rates for Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No. 07-135; Broadband Industry Practices, 07-52 Dear Ms. Gillett: AT&T has long supported both the goal of a vibrant, open Internet and the four principles contained in the Commission’s Internet Policy Statement. One of those principles, the fourth, is designed to ensure that consumers reap the benefits of competition among providers of networks, applications, services and content. As President Obama explained earlier this week, the fundamental purpose of the Commission’s Internet Policy Statement is to “ensure there’s a level playing field” between competitors.1 This vision is apparently not shared by one of the most noisome trumpeters of so-called “net neutrality” regulation, Google, at least when it comes to its own services. Numerous press reports indicate that Google is systematically blocking telephone calls from consumers that use Google Voice to call telephone numbers in certain rural communities.2 By blocking these calls, Google is able to reduce its access expenses. Other providers, including those with which Google Voice competes, are banned from call blocking because in June 2007, the Wireline Competition Bureau emphatically declared that all carriers are prohibited from pursuing “self help actions such as call blocking.” The Bureau expressed concern that call blocking “may degrade the reliability of the nation’s telecommunications network.”3 Google Voice thus has claimed for itself a significant advantage over providers offering competing services.
- 
												  Complaints by Practice, Business, and Year Based on Complaint by PracticeComplaints By Practice, Business, and Year Based on Complaint By Practice OpenedYear PracticeName 2013 Abandonment of MH 2020 Abandonment of MH 2021 Abandonment of MH 2014 Abandonment of MH 2013 Abandonment of MH 2014 Abandonment of MH 2013 Abandonment of MH 2021 Abandonment of MH 2015 Abandonment of MH 2018 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2021 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2021 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2018 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) Page 1 of 480 09/25/2021 Complaints By Practice, Business, and Year Based on Complaint By Practice BusinessName id 3 1 1 Comcast 1 Easy Acres Mobile Home Park 1 Leisure Estates 1 Pinecroft Mobile Home Park 1 T-Mobile 1 1 3 1 6 2 Baths Only fka Nathan Construction 1 Clallam Bay Corrections Center 1 Disability Rights Washington 1 Fidelity Investments 1 Fred Meyer 1 JAMS Mediation Arbitration and ADR Services 1 King County Metro 1 Page 2 of 480 09/25/2021 Complaints By Practice, Business, and Year Based on Complaint By Practice 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2021 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2021
- 
												  Mobile Yellow Pages Market Driven by the Increase in Smartphone UsageOct 26, 2012 10:31 BST Mobile Yellow Pages market driven by the increase in smartphone usage The mobile Yellow Pages market has been forecast to hit a valuation of US$28.8 billion by the year 2018, with the industry being predominantly driven by the ever growing usage of mobile phones, in particular the use of smartphones for local business searches. This growing trend is becoming ever more popular that local searches through mobile devices are set to surpass desktop PCs in the near future. Mobile communication devices particularly mobile phones have become ever-present, with their usage growing constantly year by year, they are rapidly becoming the preferred platform for searching local content among a large number of consumers. Due to its relatively recent origin in the market, the mobile yellow pages segment is currently in the early stages of development, with the potential to emerge as a vibrant market in the foreseeable future. Key factors expected to contribute to growth within the mobile Yellow Pages market include faster mobile Internet, the growing penetration rates of smart phones, the increased adoption of location based searches and the rising awareness of the advantages of location based advertising. The United States dominates as the largest region within the mobile Yellow Pages market. Large scale market penetration in the country is driven primarily by the growing adoption of the mobile yellow pages platform by businesses for enhancing their reach in the market. Key players currently dominating the mobile Yellow Pages market include, AT&T, YP Holdings LLC, Dex One Corporation, Pages Jaunes Groupe, Seat Paigne Gialle, SuperMedia Inc., hibu Plc, Yellowbook, and Yellow Pages Group.
- 
												  Jones TestimonyTestimony of Philip B. Jones, Commissioner of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission before the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Hearing on “Universal Service Reform – Bringing Broadband to all Americans” October 12, 2011 Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission 1300 S. Evergreen Park Drive, P.O. Box 47250 Olympia, WA 98504 Telephone (360) 664-1160, Facsimile (360) 586-1150 Internet Home Page http://www.utc.wa.gov 1 | P a g e INTRODUCTION Chairman Rockefeller, Ranking Member Hutchison and members of the Committee, I appreciate the opportunity to testify today on reform of the federal universal service fund (USF) program and intercarrier compensation (ICC) rules My name is Phil Jones. I have been a Commissioner with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission since 2005. Currently, I am the Second Vice President of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), Co-Chair of NARUC‟s Washington Action Committee, Chair of the Board of Directors of the National Regulatory Research Institute, and Chair of the Federal Legislation subcommittee of NARUC‟s Committee on Telecommunications. During my six years as a Telecommunications Committee member, I have served on several task forces that have pressed hard for both intercarrier compensation and universal service reform, including the well known NARUC task force on intercarrier compensation that facilitated the filing of the first broad consensus on reform – the so-called “Missoula Plan”–and a separate earlier task force focused upon “Eligible Telecommunication Carrier” designations. I am here today to testify on behalf of myself and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC).
- 
												  Fox Valley Park District List of Bills Month Ending August 31, 2015FOX VALLEY PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES Serving the Fox Valley Park District Kane, DuPage, Kendall and Will Counties, Illinois OPEN SESSION MEETING AGENDA September 21, 2015 Prisco Community Center 150 W. Illinois Avenue, Aurora 6:00 p.m. 1.0 CALL MEETING TO ORDER President Vaughan 2.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE President Vaughan 3.0 ROLL CALL President Vaughan 4.0 ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA President Vaughan 5.0 CONSENT AGENDA President Vaughan 5.1 Approve the Open Session meeting minutes of 08/17/15. 5.2 Approve payables 08/31/15 in the amount of $1,119,607.96. 5.3 Approve statement of estimated revenues and expenses for period ending 07/31/15. 5.4 Approve Executive Director, Department Heads and other reports. 5.5 Capital projects permitting fees and charges, cost summaries and project bid schedule report. 5.6 Approve the extension of the license agreement for three years with Reuland Food Service, Inc. to provide concession services at the outdoor aquatic centers and Blackberry Farm. 5.7 Approve the Asphalt and Paving Projects at various sites throughout the District in the amount of $$261,000 from Evans and Son Blacktop, Inc. 5.8 Approve the License Agreement between the Fox Valley Park District and Copley Memorial Hospital, Inc. for a sidewalk access connection to the Waubonsie Creek Trail. 5.9 Approve the amendment to the agreement with Ellis and Associates exercising the option to extend the Vaughan Athletic Center aquatics operating agreement for three years (through the 2019 fiscal year). 5.10 Approve the amendment to the agreement with Ellis and Associates exercising the option to extend the operating agreement for the outdoor aquatic centers for three years (through the 2018 season).
- 
												  Federal Communications Commission FCC 15-14Federal Communications Commission FCC 15-14 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Connect America Fund ) WC Docket No. 10-90 ) Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation ) CC Docket No. 01-92 Regime ) ) DECLARATORY RULING Adopted: February 2, 2015 Released: February 11, 2015 By the Commission: Chairman Wheeler issuing a separate statement; Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 4 A. The USF/ICC Transformation Order .............................................................................................. 4 B. Switching Functionality Guidance................................................................................................. 11 C. Nature of the Disputes ................................................................................................................... 16 III. DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................... 19 A. The VoIP Symmetry Rule is Not Limited to Facilities-Based VoIP Services............................... 20 B. Application of the VoIP Symmetry Rule to Over-the-Top VoIP Furthers Commission
- 
												  DOC-359493A1.PdfSeptember 5, 2019 FACT SHEET* Updating the Intercarrier Compensation Regime to Eliminate Access Arbitrage Report and Order and Modification of Section 214 Authorizations – WC Docket No. 18-155 Background: Certain rural local exchange carriers (LECs) have been taking advantage of inefficiently high access charges allowed under the current intercarrier compensation regime to engage in an arbitrage scheme known as “access stimulation.” Specifically, to artificially increase their access charge revenues, these LECs stimulate terminating call volumes through arrangements with providers of “free” high-volume calling services, such as conference calling and chat lines. Access stimulation generates extraordinary numbers of inbound calls, which results in excessive access charges that long-distance providers (known as interexchange carriers or IXCs) are forced to pay. This traffic currently costs IXCs between $60 and $80 million annually, and these costs are generally borne by all of their users, regardless of which customers actually make calls to high-volume calling services. As a result, long-distance customers collectively subsidize the “free” services offered by high-volume calling service providers. In 2011, the FCC sought to eliminate the harm to American consumers from access stimulation through (1) targeted rules aimed at reducing the end office terminating access rates that access-stimulating LECs can collect, and therefore, share with high-volume calling service providers; and (2) changes to the broader intercarrier compensation system aimed at moving the entire system to bill-and-keep. Under bill-and-keep arrangements, a carrier generally looks to its own end-users (rather than looking to other carriers and their customers) to pay for the costs of its network.