Unsupervised Audio Source Separation Using Generative Priors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unsupervised Audio Source Separation Using Generative Priors INTERSPEECH 2020 October 25–29, 2020, Shanghai, China Unsupervised Audio Source Separation using Generative Priors Vivek Narayanaswamy1, Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan2, Rushil Anirudh2 and Andreas Spanias1 1SenSIP Center, School of ECEE, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 2Lawrence Livermore National Labs, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract given set of sources and the mixing process, consequently re- quiring complete re-training when those assumptions change. State-of-the-art under-determined audio source separation sys- This motivates a strong need for the next generation of unsuper- tems rely on supervised end to end training of carefully tailored vised separation methods that can leverage the recent advances neural network architectures operating either in the time or the in data-driven modeling, and compensate for the lack of labeled spectral domain. However, these methods are severely chal- data through meaningful priors. lenged in terms of requiring access to expensive source level Utilizing appropriate priors for the unknown sources has labeled data and being specific to a given set of sources and been an effective approach to regularize the ill-conditioned na- the mixing process, which demands complete re-training when ture of source separation. Examples include non-Gaussianity, those assumptions change. This strongly emphasizes the need statistical independence, and sparsity [13]. With the emergence for unsupervised methods that can leverage the recent advances of deep learning methods, it has been shown that choice of in data-driven modeling, and compensate for the lack of la- the network architecture implicitly induces a structural prior for beled data through meaningful priors. To this end, we propose a solving inverse problems [14]. Based on this finding, Tian et al. novel approach for audio source separation based on generative recently introduced a deep audio prior (DAP) [15] that directly priors trained on individual sources. Through the use of pro- utilizes the structure of a randomly initialized neural network jected gradient descent optimization, our approach simultane- to learn time-frequency masks that isolate the individual com- ously searches in the source-specific latent spaces to effectively ponents in the mixture audio without any pre-training. Interest- recover the constituent sources. Though the generative priors ingly, DAP was shown to outperform several classical priors. can be defined in the time domain directly, e.g. WaveGAN, Here, we consider an alternative approach for under-determined we find that using spectral domain loss functions for our opti- source separation based on data priors defined via deep gener- mization leads to good-quality source estimates. Our empirical ative models, and in particular using generative adversarial net- studies on standard spoken digit and instrument datasets clearly works (GANs) [16]. We hypothesize that such a data prior will demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach over classical as produce higher quality source estimates by enforcing the esti- well as state-of-the-art unsupervised baselines. mated solutions to belong to the data manifold. While GAN Index Terms: audio source separation, unsupervised learning, priors have been successfully utilized in inverse imaging prob- generative priors, projected gradient descent lems [17, 18, 19, 20] such as denoising, deblurring, compressed recovery etc., their use in source separation has not been studied 1. Introduction yet – particularly in the context of audio. In this paper, we pro- Audio source separation, the process of recovering constituent pose a novel unsupervised approach for source separation that source signals from a given audio mixture, is a key compo- utilizes multiple source-specific priors and employs Projected nent in downstream applications such as audio enhancement Gradient Descent (PGD)-style optimization with carefully de- and music information retrieval [1, 2]. Typically formulated signed spectral-domain loss functions. Since our approach is as an inverse optimization problem, source separation has been an inference-time technique, it is extremely flexible and general traditionally solved using a broad class of matrix factoriza- such that it can be used even with a single mixture. We uti- tion methods [3, 4, 5], e.g., Independent Component Analysis lize the time-domain based WaveGAN [21] model to construct (ICA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). While these the source-specific priors, and interestingly, we find that using methods are known to be effective in over-determined scenar- spectral losses for the inversion leads to superior quality results. ios, i.e. the number of mixture observations is greater than Using standard benchmark datasets (spoken digit audio (SC09), the number of sources, they are severely challenged in under- drums and piano), we evaluate the proposed approach under the determined settings [6]. Consequently, in the recent years, su- assumption that mixing process is known. From our rigorous pervised deep learning based solutions have become popular empirical study, we find that the proposed data prior is con- for under-determined source separation [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. sistently superior to other commonly adopted priors, including the recent deep audio prior [15]. The codes for our work are These approaches can be broadly classified into time domain i and spectral domain methods, and often produce state-of-the-art publicly available. performance on standard benchmarks. Despite their effective- ness, there is a fundamental drawback with supervised methods. 2. Designing Priors for Inverse Problems In addition to requiring access to large number of observations, Despite the advances in learning methods for audio process- a supervised source separation model is highly specific to the ing, under-determined source separation remains a critical chal- This work was supported in part by the ASU SenSIP Center, Ari- lenge. Formally, in our setup, the number of mixtures or ob- zona State University. Portions of this work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore Na- ihttps://github.com/vivsivaraman/ tional Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. sourcesepganprior Copyright © 2020 ISCA 2657 http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2020-3115 servations m n, i.e. the number of sources. A common approach to make this ill-defined problem tractable is to place appropriate priors to restrict the solution space. Existing ap- proaches can be broadly classified into the following categories: (i) Statistical Priors. This includes the class of matrix fac- torization methods conventionally used in source separation. For example in ICA, we enforce the assumptions of non- Gaussianity as well as statistical independence between the sources. On the other hand, PCA enforces statistical inde- pendence between the sources by linear projection onto mutu- ally orthogonal subspaces. KernelPCA [22] induces the same prior in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. Another popular approach is Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), which Figure 1: An overview of the proposed unsupervised source sep- places a non-negativity prior on the estimated basis matrices aration system. [23]. Finally, a sparsity prior (`1) [13] placed either in the ob- served domain or in the expansion via an appropriate basis set or a dictionary has also been widely adopted to regularize this 3. Approach problem. Audio source separation involves the process of recovering con- (ii) Structural Priors. Recent advances in deep neural net- d stituent sources fsi 2 R ji = 1 ··· Kg from a given audio mix- work design have shown that certain carefully chosen networks d ture m 2 R , where K is the total number of sources and d is have the innate capability to effectively regularize or behave as the number of time steps. In this paper, without loss of general- a prior to solve ill-posed inverse problems. These networks ity, we assume the source and mixtures to be mono-channel and essentially capture the underlying statistics of data, indepen- PK the mixing process to be a sum of sources i.e., m = i=1 si. dent of the task-specific training. These structural priors have Figure 1 provides an overview of our proposed approach for un- produced state-of-the-art performance in inverse imaging prob- supervised source separation. Here, we sample the source audio lems [14] and recently, Tian et al. [15] utilized the structure of from the respective priors and perform additive mixing to recon- an U-Net [24] model to learn time-frequency masks that can PK struct the mixture i.e, m^ = i=1 Gi(zi). The mixture is then isolate the individual components in the mixture audio. processed to obtain the corresponding spectrogram. In addition, (iii) GAN Priors. A third class of methods have relied on priors we also compute the source level spectrograms. We perform defined via generative models, e.g. GANs [16]. GANs can learn source separation by efficiently searching the latent space of the parameterized non-linear distributions p(X; z) from a sufficient source-specific priors Gi using Projected Gradient Descent op- amount of unlabeled data X [21, 25], where z denotes the la- timizing a spectral domain loss function L. More formally, for tent variables of the model. In addition to readily sampling from a single mixture m, our objective function is given by, trained GAN models, they can be leveraged as an effective prior X GAN priors ∗ K for . Popularly referred to as , they have been fzi gi=1 = arg min L(m^ ; m) + R(fGi(zi)g); (1) found to be highly effective in challenging inverse problems z1;z2:::zK [19, 20]. In its most general form, when one attempts to recover where the first term measures the discrepancy between the true the original data x from its corrupted version ~x (observed), and estimated mixtures and the second term is an optional reg- one can maximize the posterior distribution p(X = xj~x; z) by ularizer on the estimated sources. In every PGD iteration, we searching in the latent space of a pre-trained GAN.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 15 - BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION: Principal & Independent Component Analysis C G.D
    HST-582J/6.555J/16.456J Biomedical Signal and Image Processing Spring 2008 Chapter 15 - BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION: Principal & Independent Component Analysis c G.D. Clifford 2005-2008 Introduction In this chapter we will examine how we can generalize the idea of transforming a time series into an alternative representation, such as the Fourier (frequency) domain, to facil- itate systematic methods of either removing (filtering) or adding (interpolating) data. In particular, we will examine the techniques of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), and Independent Component Analysis (ICA). Both of these techniques utilize a representation of the data in a statistical domain rather than a time or frequency domain. That is, the data are projected onto a new set of axes that fulfill some statistical criterion, which implies independence, rather than a set of axes that represent discrete frequencies such as with the Fourier transform, where the independence is assumed. Another important difference between these statistical techniques and Fourier-based tech- niques is that the Fourier components onto which a data segment is projected are fixed, whereas PCA- or ICA-based transformations depend on the structure of the data being ana- lyzed. The axes onto which the data are projected are therefore discovered. If the structure of the data (or rather the statistics of the underlying sources) changes over time, then the axes onto which the data are projected will change too1. Any projection onto another set of axes (or into another space) is essentially a method for separating the data out into separate components or sources which will hopefully allow us to see important structure more clearly in a particular projection.
    [Show full text]
  • Signal Processing for Magnetoencephalography
    Signal Processing for Magnetoencephalography Rupert Benjamin Clarke Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of York Department of Electronics September 2010 Abstract Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive technology for imaging human brain function. Contemporary methods of analysing MEG data include dipole fitting, minimum norm estimation (MNE) and beamforming. These are concerned with localising brain activity, but in isolation they do not provide concrete evidence of interaction among brain regions. Since cognitive neuroscience demands answers to this type of question, a novel signal processing framework has been developed consisting of three stages. The first stage uses conventional MNE to separate a small number of underlying source signals from a large data set. The second stage is a novel time-frequency analysis consisting of a recursive filter bank. Finally, the filtered outputs from different brain regions are compared using a unique partial cross-correlation analysis that accounts for propagation time. The output from this final stage could be used to construct conditional independence graphs depicting the internal networks of the brain. In the second processing stage, a complementary pair of high- and low-pass filters is iteratively applied to a discrete time series. The low-pass output is critically sampled at each stage, which both removes redundant information and effectively scales the filter coefficients in time. The approach is similar to the Fast Wavelet Transform (FWT), but features a more sophisticated resampling step. This, in combination with the filter design procedure leads to a finer frequency resolution than the FWT. The subsequent correlation analysis is unusual in that a latency estimation procedure is included to establish the probable transmission delays between regions of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1909.11294V3 [Stat.ML] 11 Jun 2021
    Hierarchical Probabilistic Model for Blind Source Separation via Legendre Transformation Simon Luo1,2 Lamiae Azizi1,2 Mahito Sugiyama3 1School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 2Data Analytics for Resources and Environments (DARE), Australian Research Council, Sydney, Australia 3National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan Abstract 2010] extract a specified number of components with the largest variance under an orthogonal constraint. They are composed of a linear combination of variables, and create a We present a novel blind source separation (BSS) set of uncorrelated orthogonal basis vectors that represent method, called information geometric blind source the source signal. The basis vectors with the N largest separation (IGBSS). Our formulation is based on variance are called the principal components and are the the log-linear model equipped with a hierarchi- output of the model. PCA has shown to be effective for cally structured sample space, which has theoreti- many applications such as dimensionality reduction and cal guarantees to uniquely recover a set of source feature extraction. However, for BSS, PCA makes the signals by minimizing the KL divergence from a assumption that the source signals are orthogonal, which is set of mixed signals. Source signals, received sig- often not the case in most practical applications. nals, and mixing matrices are realized as different layers in our hierarchical sample space. Our em- Similarly, ICA also attempts to find the N components with pirical results have demonstrated on images and the largest variance by relaxing the orthogonality constraint. time series data that our approach is superior to Variations of ICA, such as infomax [Bell and Sejnowski, well established techniques and is able to separate 1995], FastICA [Hyvärinen and Oja, 2000], and JADE [Car- signals with complex interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Signal Analysis
    Duann, Jung and Makeig: Brain Sugnal Analysis Brain Signal Analysis Jeng-Ren Duann, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Scott Makeig Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego CA Computational Neurobiology Lab, The Salk Institute, La Jolla CA RUNNING HEAD: Brain signal analysis Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have now been applied to a wide variety of real-world problems in many fields of application. The attractive and flexible characteristics of ANNs, such as their parallel operation, learning by example, associative memory, multifactorial optimization and extensibility, make them well suited to the analysis of biological and medical signals. In this study, we review applications of ANNs to brain signal analysis, for instance, for analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetoencephalogram (MEG), or electromyogram (EMG), and as applied to computed tomographic (CT) images and magnetic resonance (MR) brain images, and to series of functional MR brain images (i.e. fMRI). 1 Duann, Jung and Makeig: Brain Sugnal Analysis 1. INTRODUCTION Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are computational framework inspired by our expanding knowledge of the activity of networks of biological neurons in the brain. ANNs cannot hope to reproduce all the still not well-understood complexities of actual brain networks. Rather, most ANNs are implemented as sets of nonlinear summing elements interconnected by weighted links, forming a highly simplified model of brain connectivity. The basic operation of such artificial neurons is to pass a weighted sum of their inputs through a nonlinear hard-limiting or soft “squashing” function. To form an ANN, these basic calculating elements (artificial neurons) are most often arranged in interconnected layers.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Multivariate Signal Processing Operations
    Chapter 5 Some multivariate signal processing operations In this chapter we study some signal processing operations for multivariable signals. We will consider applications where one collects a set of signals xi(n); i = 1; 2;:::;M from some system. It is then important to study whether there are possible interde- pendencies between the signals. Such interdependencies cause redundancies, which can be exploited for data compression. Interdependencies between the individual signals can also contain useful information about the structure of the underlying systems that generated the set of signals. Firstly, when the number M of signals is large dependencies between the individual signals make it possible to compress the data. This is for example the case when the M signals xi represent pixels of a sequence of images, where M is the number of pixels in one image. If the images of interest depict a speci¯c class of objects, such as human faces, it turns out that there are redundancies among the various xi's which can be exploited to compress the images. Secondly, the individual signals xi(n) are often mixtures of unknown source signals sj(n). If the mixture is assumed linear, this implies that there are source signals sj(n) such that xi(n) = ai1s1(n) + ai2s2(n) + ¢ ¢ ¢ + aiMS sMS ; i = 1; 2;:::;M (5.1) for n = 0; 1;:::;N ¡ 1, where MS is the number of source signals. Introducing the vectors 2 3 2 3 x1(n) s1(n) 6 7 6 7 6 x (n) 7 6 s (n) 7 6 2 7 6 2 7 x(n) = 6 .
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Signal Fraction Analysis and Artifact
    THESIS SIGNAL FRACTION ANALYSIS AND ARTIFACT REMOVAL IN EEG Submitted by James N. Knight Department of Computer Science In partial ful¯llment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2003 ABSTRACT OF THESIS SIGNAL FRACTION ANALYSIS AND ARTIFACT REMOVAL IN EEG The presence of artifacts, such as eye blinks, in electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings obscures the underlying processes and makes analysis di±cult. Large amounts of data must often be discarded because of contamination by eye blinks, muscle activity, line noise, and pulse signals. To overcome this di±culty, signal separation techniques are used to separate artifacts from the EEG data of interest. The maximum signal fraction (MSF) transformation is introduced as an alternative to the two most common techniques: principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). A signal separation method based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is also considered. The method of delays is introduced as a technique for dealing with non-instantaneous mixing of brain and artifact source signals. The signal separation methods are compared on a series of tests constructed from arti¯cially generated data. A novel method of comparison based on the classi¯cation of mental task data for a brain-computer interface (BCI) is also pursued. The results show that the MSF transformation is an e®ective technique for removing artifacts from EEG recordings. The performance of the MSF approach is comparable with ICA, the current state of the art, and is faster to compute. It is also demonstrated that certain artifacts can be removed from EEG data without negatively impacting the classi¯cation of mental tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Blind Source Separation in NMR Spectroscopy Ichrak Toumi, Stefano Caldarelli, Bruno Torrésani
    A review of blind source separation in NMR spectroscopy Ichrak Toumi, Stefano Caldarelli, Bruno Torrésani To cite this version: Ichrak Toumi, Stefano Caldarelli, Bruno Torrésani. A review of blind source separation in NMR spectroscopy. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Elsevier, 2014, 81, pp.37-64. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2014.06.002. hal-01060561 HAL Id: hal-01060561 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01060561 Submitted on 3 Sep 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A review of Blind Source Separation in NMR Spectroscopy Ichrak Toumi, Stefano Caldarelli iSm2, UMR 7313, Aix Marseille Universit´eCNRS Marseille, France Bruno Torr´esani Aix-Marseille Universit´eCNRS, Centrale Marseille I2M, UMR 7373, 13453 Marseille, France Abstract Fourier transform is the data processing naturally associated to most NMR experi- ments. Notable exceptions are Pulse Field Gradient and relaxation analysis, the structure of which is only partially suitable for FT. With the revamp of NMR of complex mixtures, fueled by analytical challenges such as metabolomics, alternative and more apt mathematical methods for data processing have been sought, with the aim of decomposing the NMR signal into simpler bits.
    [Show full text]
  • Audio Source Separation for Music in Low-Latency and High-Latency Scenarios
    Audio Source Separation for Music in Low-latency and High-latency Scenarios Ricard Marxer Pi~n´on TESI DOCTORAL UPF / 2013 Directors de la tesi Dr. Xavier Serra i Dr. Jordi Janer Department of Information and Communication Technologies This dissertation is dedicated to my family and loved ones. Acknowledgments I wish to thank the Music Technology Group (MTG) at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF) for creating such a great environment in which to work on this research. I especially want to thank my supervisors Xavier Serra and Jordi Janer for giving me this opportunity and their support during the whole process. I also want to express my deepest gratitude to the Yamaha Corporation and their Monet research team formed by Keita Arimoto, Sean Hashimoto, Kazunobu Kondo, Yu Takahashi and Yasuyuki Umeyama, without whom this work would not have been possible. I also want to thank MTG's signal processing team composed of Merlijn Blaauw, Jordi Bonada, Graham Coleman, Saso Musevic and Marti Umbert with whom we had many fruitful discussions that became the seeds of the research conducted here. Another special thanks goes to the Music Cognition Group at the ILLC / University of Amsterdam with Henkjan Honing, Leigh Smith and Olivia Ladinig who invited me to stay and do research with them for a while. There I learned a lot about how we humans perceive music and how this can be taken into account when processing these types of signals. Many thanks to all the researchers with whom I have collaborated, discus- sed and shared great moments over these years.
    [Show full text]
  • Blind Dimensionality Reduction with Analog Integrated Photonics
    1 Demonstration of multivariate photonics: blind dimensionality reduction with analog integrated photonics Alexander N. Tait*, Philip Y. Ma, Thomas Ferreira de Lima, Eric C. Blow, Matthew P. Chang, Mitchell A. Nahmias, Bhavin J. Shastri, and Paul R. Prucnal Abstract Multi-antenna radio front-ends generate a multi-dimensional flood of information, most of which is partially redundant. Redundancy is eliminated by dimensionality reduction, but contemporary digital processing techniques face harsh fundamental tradeoffs when implementing this class of functions. These tradeoffs can be broken in the analog domain, in which the performance of optical technologies greatly exceeds that of electronic counterparts. Here, we present concepts, methods, and a first demonstration of multivariate photonics: a combination of integrated photonic hardware, analog dimensionality reduc- tion, and blind algorithmic techniques. We experimentally demonstrate 2-channel, 1.0 GHz principal component analysis in a photonic weight bank using recently proposed algorithms for synthesizing the multivariate properties of signals to which the receiver is blind. Novel methods are introduced for controlling blindness conditions in a laboratory context. This work provides a foundation for further research in multivariate photonic information processing, which is poised to play a role in future generations of wireless technology. Index Terms Microwave Photonics, Silicon Photonics, Analog Integrated Circuits, Multidimensional Signal Pro- arXiv:1903.03474v1 [physics.app-ph] 10 Feb 2019 cessing, Adaptive Estimation *Corresponding author: [email protected] The authors are with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. A.N.T. is now with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80305, USA. B.J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Sparse and Non-Sparse Methods in Source Separation
    Survey of Sparse and Non-Sparse Methods in Source Separation Paul D. O’Grady,1 Barak A. Pearlmutter,1 Scott T. Rickard2 1 Hamilton Institute, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland. Ollscoil na hE´ ireann Ma´ Nuad, E´ ire 2 University College Dublin, Ireland. An Cola´ iste Ollscoile, Baile A´ tha Cliath, E´ ire Received 20 September 2004; accepted 4 April 2005 ABSTRACT: Source separation arises in a variety of signal process- influences the complexity of source separation. If M ¼ N, the mixing ing applications, ranging from speech processing to medical image process A is defined by an even-determined (i.e. square) matrix and, analysis. The separation of a superposition of multiple signals is provided that it is non-singular, the underlying sources can be esti- accomplished by taking into account the structure of the mixing proc- mated by a linear transformation. If M > N, the mixing process A is ess and by making assumptions about the sources. When the infor- defined by an over-determined matrix and, provided that it is full mation about the mixing process and sources is limited, the problem is called ‘‘blind’. By assuming that the sources can be represented rank, the underlying sources can be estimated by least-squares opti- sparsely in a given basis, recent research has demonstrated that sol- misation or linear transformation involving matrix pseudo-inver- utions to previously problematic blind source separation problems sion. If M < N, then the mixing process is defined by an under-deter- can be obtained. In some cases, solutions are possible to problems mined matrix and consequently source estimation becomes more intractable by previous non-sparse methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Anechoic Blind Source Separation Using Wigner Marginals
    JournalofMachineLearningResearch12(2011)1111-1148 Submitted 11/08; Revised 8/10; Published 3/11 Anechoic Blind Source Separation Using Wigner Marginals Lars Omlor [email protected] Martin A. Giese∗ [email protected] Section for Computational Sensomotorics, Department of Cognitive Neurology Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research & Center for Integrative Neuroscience University Clinic Tubingen¨ Frondsbergstrasse 23 72070 Tubingen,¨ Germany Editor: Daniel Lee Abstract Blind source separation problems emerge in many applications, where signals can be modeled as superpositions of multiple sources. Many popular applications of blind source separation are based on linear instantaneous mixture models. If specific invariance properties are known about the sources, for example, translation or rotation invariance, the simple linear model can be ex- tended by inclusion of the corresponding transformations. When the sources are invariant against translations (spatial displacements or time shifts) the resulting model is called an anechoic mixing model. We present a new algorithmic framework for the solution of anechoic problems in arbitrary dimensions. This framework is derived from stochastic time-frequency analysis in general, and the marginal properties of the Wigner-Ville spectrum in particular. The method reduces the gen- eral anechoic problem to a set of anechoic problems with non-negativity constraints and a phase retrieval problem. The first type of subproblem can be solved by existing algorithms, for example by an appropriate modification of non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). The second subprob- lem is solved by established phase retrieval methods. We discuss and compare implementations of this new algorithmic framework for several example problems with synthetic and real-world data, including music streams, natural 2D images, human motion trajectories and two-dimensional shapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Principal Component Analysis and Independedent Component Analysis for Blind Source Separation
    Romanian Reports in Physics, Volume 56, Number I, P. 20-32, 2004 COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND INDEPENDEDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION R. MUTIHAC1, MARC M. VAN HULLE2 1 University of Bucharest, Department of Electricity and Biophysics, RO-76900, Romania, 2 K.U. Leuven, Labo voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium, {radu.mutihac, marc.vanhulle}@med.kuleuven.ac.be Abstract. Our contribution briefly outlines the basics of the well-established technique in data mining, namely the principal component analysis (PCA), and a rapidly emerging novel method, that is, the independent component analysis (ICA). The performance of PCA singular value decomposition-based and stationary linear ICA in blind separation of artificially generated data out of linear mixtures was critically evaluated and compared. All our results outlined the superiority of ICA relative to PCA in faithfully retrieval of the original independent source components. Key words: principal component analysis (PCA), independent component analysis (ICA), blind source separation (BSS), and higher-order statistics. 1. INTRODUCTION In data analysis, a common task consists in finding an adequate representation of multivariate data, which is expected to provide the underlying factors describing their essential structure. Linear transformations are often envisaged to perform such a task due to their computational and conceptual simplicity. Some common linear transformation methods are principal component analysis (PCA), factor analysis (FA), projection pursuit (PP), and more recently the independent component analysis (ICA). ICA has emerged as a useful extension of PCA and developed in context with blind source separation (BSS) and digital signal processing (DSP) [1], [2]. ICA is also related to recent theories of the visual brain, which assume that consecutive processing steps lead to a progressive reduction in the redundancy of the representation [3], [4].
    [Show full text]