THE MYSTERY of the BLACK MOUND by Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE MYSTERY of the BLACK MOUND by Dr Reprinted from Gloucestershire History N0. 2 (1988) pages 12-13 THE MYSTERY OF THE BLACK MOUND by Dr. Christopher Cox The Hundred of Blacklow (the Black Mound) sides of the Nailsworth valley. A charter of 896 A.D.,’ includes in the Domesday Survey: Alkerton (= resolving a dispute between the lessees and the owners of Eastington), Frampton-on- Severn, Fretherne, lands attached to the estate makes this clear, when the Frocester, King’s Stanley, Leonard Stanley, witan summoned to Gloucester ordered a survey of the Stonehouse, Wheatenhurst (alias Whitminster), and lands in question, which was carried out by Ecglaf, the Woodchester.' Whether these names represent the “geneat” or agent of Aethebald the lessee, and (perhaps later) parishes is a moot point, but need not Wulhum, the “ceastersetne preoste” or “Citizens’ concern us here. chaplain,’ of whom more below.‘ These parishes or estates lie on either side of the lower This raises intriguing possibilities, as to whether there course of the Frome from below Stroud to its was any form of territorial continuity between the confluence with the River Severn at Framilode.2 But Roman villa of Woodchester and the Woodchester of with one exception — Woodchester. the Saxon period, though this is not the place to venture Woodchester is nowadays a small triangular parish on too far into such a speculative quicksand.’ But it seems the western flank of the lower Nailsworth valley, and obvious that pre-Conquest “Woodchester” was a more has no direct connection with the valley of the Frome. than ordinary estate, perhaps a lingering echo of the This anomaly has to be explained, so the first part of great Roman villa, the ruins of which would then still the problem is what was “Woodchester” at that time? have been above ground: the Norman church (since Two “Woodchesters” are recorded in Domesday.’ replaced by another on a different site) used Roman One was in Longtree Hundred, held before the materials in its construction, as the curious visitor may Conquest by Gytha, mother of Earl Harold, and the still see from the scant remains of that edifice. other was in Blacklow Hundred, held TRE by Brictric. It is likely that the Longtree “Woodchester” This conjecture provides an explanation as to why corresponds with the tithing of Rodborough on the Blacklow Hundred included “Woodchester” — the eastern side of the valley,‘ but eventually both sides of estates in the Vale could well have been land attached to this valley were brought within the Longtree Hundred, the more prestigious estate in the Nailsworth valley. It and the Hundred of Blacklow does not appear again must be remembered that in the earlier period before the after Domesday, the Vale parishes being reconstituted Conquest estates were of some considerable size, only into the Hundred of Whitstone. So the problem can be later being sub-divided into smaller manors or parishes, restated: why was this anomalous “Woodchester” perhaps in response to the troubles of the Danish included in Blacklow Hundred, and (as a corollary) incursions, perhaps also in the reconquest by the West where was the meeting place of the Hundred? Though Saxon kings of Midland England when the older recorded in Domesday as two estates, “Woodchester” Mercian units of administration were completely earlier was of much greater extent with lands on both replaced by the more familiar shires).3 — 1 ii mi q ! rt-Ii-— ___ 77' — 7 71 1 BLACKLOW HUNDRED l FRE .. Fretherneh l O 8 6 7 ——— i-83-1 FoS Frampton-on-;evern- —$*'*|q I__ __ ___ _ _ I WH .. Wheatenhurst I . , (Whitminster) .1 A = (E) .. Alkerton l (+ Eastington) \ FRO .. Frocester ‘ ST .. Stonehouse LS .. Leonard Stanley KS-.. King's Stanley 1 WD .. Woodchester 1 . I t — "1177 r *f"' D 56$ " l9th century parish “ 11 TheboundariesToots —</Q F“-9 Roman villa El -\'_|/ S“ Fords /| FRO LS |<5$\// _ Edge of the sc\a’rR\ , \\ - . .1\_,\ “" The course of the F J \\\\|)\\ 1 Frome has been much - altered over the l m~lr';- \ U1.,,9>'1‘5,l‘lr(\ centuri es . u "W Q ix’ ' 7 7 '77’ —7 7 — ‘J! 7 Tr- 12 The meeting place of the Hundred (assuming the REFERENCES AND NOTES above is accepted) would thus be conveniently close to 1. Domesday Book names etc. are taken from Domesday Book: the most important estate of the group, that is Gloucestershire, Moore JS (Phillimore, 1982). Blacklow appears Woodchester. Such meeting places were often named variously as Blachelew, Blaechelev, Blaechelave, Blachelev. The Langetrev Woodchester is Vdecestre, the Blachelov one Widecestre after (and identified by) a recognisable feature, such as 2. “The Frome emerges from the Oolitic escapement at Stroud, a tree (as in Longtree or Grumbald’sAsh), a mound crosses the sub-edge plain as far as Stonehouse in a deep trench, (Brightwells Barrow, Blacklow), or the most important and thence in a shallow valley flanked on the south-west, round part of the estate (Berkeley, Westbury).° Frampton, by a wide spread of oolitic gravels.“ Wills LJ, on the To reach such an assembly point the various Pleistocene of the Lower Severn in Quarterly Journal of the tithingmen would need to set out at first light, and some Geological Society xciv, 1938, 161 of them would have a considerable distance to travel. In 3. Moore JS op cit: 1.63 and 78.14 the case of Blacklow Hundred, there is a well-known 4. See e.g. Watson CE “The Story of the Manor” TrBGAS liv of and conspicuous landmark which could well serve the 1932. He has suggestions as to the identification of places named in the Perambulation; these have however not all been positively purpose. This is the long barrow on the verge of Selsley identified Common, known as The Toots. It has in the past been 5. Text and translation given in TrBGAS5, for 1880-81, Appendix carefully bisected so that now it presents the A appearance of two barrows, but despite this rough 6. While the Witan (or Court of Inquiry) was held in Gloucester, surgery and the erosion of time it is still a recognisable possibly at the royal palace at Kingsholm, Wulfhun, “ceastersetna and outstanding feature on the long, level profile of the preost", is clearly the representative of the bishop, as Ecglaf for Common. The tithing men approaching from the more the defendent, Aethelwald. The seat of the bishop was at distant Vale estates would follow tracks on the terraces Worcester, so the “ceaster” is on balance of probability the city on either side of the Frome, utilising fords such as those of Worcester at Ryeford and Dudbridge to approach the stiff climb (Kingsholm palace--see C Heighway, Gloucester—a History & Guide, A. Sutton 1985, p35) up to the top. Against the light of the sun rising in the 7. See e.g. Finberg HPR “Some early Gloucesteershire estates” in east, both the Common and the mound itself would “Gloucestershire Studies, ” (Leics 1957) and his suggestions of stand out in stark and clear silhouette for much of the continuityin boundaries from Roman to Saxon times in “Roman way until on near appraoch the swell of the hill took the and Saxon Withington,” (Leics Univ. English Local History landmark below the line of sight. From say Stonehouse Paper 8, 1955). See also Sarah T Wool’s Bristol Ph.D thesis, to Ebley even today it is clearly to be seen as an obvious “Fundus and Manerium: a study of continuity and survival in landmark: in the days when there were fewer buildings Gloucestershirefrom Roman to Medieval Times“ (Bristol Univ, (and no tall chimneys) to distract the eye, it must have 1982). Michael Wood, Domesday, a search for the roots of been an invaluable guiding mark for travellers. England (BBC 1986) has some interesting remarks on the likely This, then, it is suggested is the Black Mound from continuity of some sort between post-Roman and English times (see his ch. iv). which the early Hundred was named. It seems possible 8. For the Hwicce, see Hooke D, “The Anglo-Saxon Landscape: that after Domesday Woodchester lost its the Kingdom ofthe Hwicce“ (Man. Univ. 1985). predominance, shrinking to its later parish size, while 9. Anderson OS, “The English Hundred Names” Lunds Univ, (no the parishes in the Vale were more suitably grouped into date); a full and interesting study of the origins and meanings of the Hundred of Whitstone. Hundred names. 13.
Recommended publications
  • 66 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    66 bus time schedule & line map 66 Stonehouse - Leonard Stanley - King's Stanley - View In Website Mode Stroud - Painswick - Cheltenham The 66 bus line (Stonehouse - Leonard Stanley - King's Stanley - Stroud - Painswick - Cheltenham) has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Brockworth: 3:30 PM (2) Cheltenham: 6:30 AM - 5:12 PM (3) Stonehouse: 7:10 AM - 10:15 PM (4) Stroud: 7:25 AM - 5:20 PM (5) Stroud: 7:39 PM - 11:59 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 66 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 66 bus arriving. Direction: Brockworth 66 bus Time Schedule 13 stops Brockworth Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:30 PM Church Of the Holy Spirit, Paganhill 106 Stratford Road, Stroud Tuesday 3:30 PM Beard's Lane, Paganhill Wednesday 3:30 PM Beards Lane, Stroud Thursday Not Operational Sgs College, Stroud Friday 3:30 PM Tesco, Stroud Saturday Not Operational Stratford Park, Stroud Salmon Springs, Stroud 66 bus Info Painswick Valley Car Sales, Stroud Direction: Brockworth Stops: 13 Painswick Road, Pitchcombe Trip Duration: 38 min Line Summary: Church Of the Holy Spirit, Paganhill, Wragg Castle Lane, Pitchcombe Beard's Lane, Paganhill, Sgs College, Stroud, Tesco, Stroud, Stratford Park, Stroud, Salmon Springs, Cheltenham Road, Pitchcombe Civil Parish Stroud, Painswick Valley Car Sales, Stroud, King's Mill Lane, Painswick Painswick Road, Pitchcombe, Wragg Castle Lane, Pitchcombe, King's Mill Lane, Painswick, Rugby Club, Painswick, St Mary's Church, Painswick, Toby Rugby Club,
    [Show full text]
  • 00052 Leonard Stanley Parish Council
    LEONARD STANLEY PARISH COUNCIL To the Local Plan Review Team Stroud District Council Ebley Mill Stroud GL5 4UB 7th January 2020 Local Plan Review - Draft Plan for Consultation November 2019 LSPC is extremely disappointed that little has been done to address their concerns raised in their response (dated 15th January 2019) to the previous consultation for the ‘Emerging Strategy’ and has several objections to the approach now being put forward. 1) According to page 33 (2.48) states: “Modest housing allocations will also be delivered at the local service centres of Berkeley, Minchinhampton, Nailsworth and Painswick and lesser levels of housing will be allocated at the Tier 3a villages of Brimscombe and Thrupp, Frampton-on-Severn, Kings Stanley, Kingswood, Leonard Stanley and Whitminster.” However, this is contradicted on Page 51 under Core Policy CP2 where the key service centres are allocated housing of between 20 and 120; whereas Tier 3a villages of Brimscombe and Thrupp, Kingswood, Leonard Stanley and Whitminster have been allocated between 40 and 190! As the statement on page 33 is mis-leading, this needs to be removed and replaced by a statement that reflects the true situation. 2) Page 50 under the description for Tier 3a – Accessible Settlement with Local Facilities “Further development will be focused inside the settlement development limits or (exceptionally) on the edge of settlements, subject to meeting criteria set out in the Plan’s Core and Delivery policies, and will principally meet specific local housing, employment and community infrastructure needs, with a view to safeguarding or enhancing each settlement’s current role, function and accessibility.” The statement of ‘exceptionally’ permitting development outside the SDL is a green light for developers to manipulate and is open to misinterpretation and therefore is a great risk to villages like Leonard Stanley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Age Tom Moore
    The Iron Age Tom Moore INTRODUCfiON In the twenty years since Alan Saville's (1984) review of the Iron Age in Gloucestershire much has happened in Iron-Age archaeology, both in the region and beyond.1 Saville's paper marked an important point in Iron-Age studies in Gloucestershire and was matched by an increasing level of research both regionally and nationally. The mid 1980s saw a number of discussions of the Iron Age in the county, including those by Cunliffe (1984b) and Darvill (1987), whilst reviews were conducted for Avon (Burrow 1987) and Somerset (Cunliffe 1982). At the same time significant advances and developments in British Iron-Age studies as a whole had a direct impact on how the period was viewed in the region. Richard Hingley's (1984) examination of the Iron-Age landscapes of Oxfordshire suggested a division between more integrated unenclosed communities in the Upper Thames Valley and isolated enclosure communities on the Cotswold uplands, arguing for very different social systems in the two areas. In contrast, Barry Cunliffe' s model ( 1984a; 1991 ), based on his work at Danebury, Hampshire, suggested a hierarchical Iron-Age society centred on hillforts directly influencing how hillforts and social organisation in the Cotswolds have been understood (Darvill1987; Saville 1984). Together these studies have set the agenda for how the 1st millennium BC in the region is regarded and their influence can be felt in more recent syntheses (e.g. Clarke 1993). Since 1984, however, our perception of Iron-Age societies has been radically altered. In particular, the role of hillforts as central places at the top of a hierarchical settlement pattern has been substantially challenged (Hill 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Committee
    27 November 2019 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE A meeting of the Environment Committee will be held on THURSDAY 5 DECEMBER 2019 in the Council Chamber, Ebley Mill, Ebley Wharf, Stroud at 7.00 pm. Kathy O’Leary Chief Executive Please Note: This meeting will be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site (www.stroud.gov.uk). By entering the Council Chamber you are consenting to being filmed. The whole of the meeting will be filmed except where there are confidential or exempt items, which may need to be considered in the absence of the press and public. A G E N D A 1 APOLOGIES To receive apologies for absence. 2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To receive declarations of interest. 3 MINUTES To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 24 October 2019. 4 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME The Chair of Committee will answer questions from members of the public submitted in accordance with the Council’s procedures. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF QUESTIONS Noon on MONDAY 2 DECEMBER 2019. Questions must be submitted in writing to the Chief Executive, Democratic Services, Ebley Mill, Ebley Wharf, Stroud and sent by post or by Email: [email protected] 5 UBICO BUSINESS PLAN 2020/21 ENGAGEMENT To receive a presentation from UBICO. 6 CARBON NEUTRAL 2030 – GENERAL UPDATE To provide an overview on activity towards Carbon Neutral 2030. 7 ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY 2019 To seek approval of the Environment Strategy 2019. Environment Committee Published 27 November 2019 5 December 2019 Page 1 of 106 8 UPDATE ON AIR QUALITY IN STROUD DISTRICT To provide information on the current position regarding air quality within the Stroud District.
    [Show full text]
  • PREHISTORIC, ROMANO-BRITISH and MEDIEVAL OCCUPATION in the FROME VALLEY, GLOUCESTERSHIRE Edited by Martin Watts
    PREHISTORIC, ROMANO-BRITISH AND MEDIEVAL OCCUPATION IN THE FROME VALLEY, GLOUCESTERSHIRE edited by Martin Watts PREHISTORIC, ROMANO-BRITISH AND MEDIEVAL OCCUPATION IN THE FROME VALLEY, GLOUCESTERSHIRE edited by Martin Watts A BEAKER PIT AND ROMANO-BRITISH SETTLEMENT AT FOXES FIELD, EBLEY ROAD, STONEHOUSE: EXCAVATIONS IN 2010-2011 by Mark Brett MEDIEVAL ENCLOSURES AND A FISHPOND AT RECTORY MEADOWS, KINGS STANLEY: EXCAVATIONS IN 2011 by Alan Hardy and Jamie Wright ~l 25 y ~ ¥.1,{ ears of ~ _ ~\ Cotswold J;;- ~ ~ Archaeology \\ Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Report No. 8 By agreement with Cotswold Archaeology this report is distributed free to members of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society To accompany Volume 131 of the Society's Transactions for 2013 Cotswold Archaeology Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Report No. 8 Published by Cotswold Archaeology ©Authors and Cotswold Archaeology Ltd, 2013 Building 11, Kemble Enterprise Park, Cirencester, Gloucestershire GL7 6BQ All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISSN 1479-2389 ISBN 978-0-9553534-5-1 Cotswold Archaeology BAGAR series 1 A Romano-British and Medieval Setdement Site at Stoke Road, Bishop's Cleeve, Gloucestershire, by Dawn Enright and Martin Watts, 2002 2 Later Prehistoric and Romano-British Burial and Settlement at Hucclecote, Gloucestershire,
    [Show full text]
  • Audit and Standards Committee
    AUDIT AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE Meeting Papers Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 19:00 Page 1 of 186 Members of Audit and Standards Committee Dorcas Binns - Member, Paul Carter - Member, Margaret Wigzell - Member, Colin Fryer - Member, Thomas Williams - Vice Chairman, Karon Cross - Member, Nigel Studdert-Kennedy - Chairman, Keith Pearson - Member, Martin Baxendale - Member FIRE EVACUATION PROCEDURES FOR VISITORS AT EBLEY MILL • Upon hearing the fire alarm, visitors should immediately evacuate the building by the nearest fire exit. These are located at the rear of the chamber, and the side door leading to the roof garden, marked as Fire Exits. • Proceed to the main staff car park, and assemble at the NB sign. • DO NOT stay, or return, to collect personal belongings. • DO NOT use the lifts when the alarm is sounding • Visitors must remain at the assembly points until permission is given to leave. • Visitors must not leave the site until instructed to do so. For details of future meetings please see the website – www.stroud.gov.uk ALL MOBILE PHONES/PAGERS SHOULD BE SWITCHED OFF OR SET TO SILENT MODE BEFORE THE START OF THE MEETING. Page 2 of 186 15 SEPTEMBER 2014 AUDIT AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE A meeting of the Audit and Standards Committee will be held on THURSDAY, 25 SEPTEMBER 2014 in the Council Chamber, Ebley Mill, Ebley Wharf, Stroud at 19:00 . David Hagg Chief Executive A G E N D A Please Note: This meeting will be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site ( www.stroud.gov.uk ). The whole of the meeting will be filmed except where there are confidential or exempt items, which may need to be considered in the absence of the press and public.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Parish Map
    Gloucestershire Parish Map MapKey NAME DISTRICT MapKey NAME DISTRICT MapKey NAME DISTRICT 1 Charlton Kings CP Cheltenham 91 Sevenhampton CP Cotswold 181 Frocester CP Stroud 2 Leckhampton CP Cheltenham 92 Sezincote CP Cotswold 182 Ham and Stone CP Stroud 3 Prestbury CP Cheltenham 93 Sherborne CP Cotswold 183 Hamfallow CP Stroud 4 Swindon CP Cheltenham 94 Shipton CP Cotswold 184 Hardwicke CP Stroud 5 Up Hatherley CP Cheltenham 95 Shipton Moyne CP Cotswold 185 Harescombe CP Stroud 6 Adlestrop CP Cotswold 96 Siddington CP Cotswold 186 Haresfield CP Stroud 7 Aldsworth CP Cotswold 97 Somerford Keynes CP Cotswold 187 Hillesley and Tresham CP Stroud 112 75 8 Ampney Crucis CP Cotswold 98 South Cerney CP Cotswold 188 Hinton CP Stroud 9 Ampney St. Mary CP Cotswold 99 Southrop CP Cotswold 189 Horsley CP Stroud 10 Ampney St. Peter CP Cotswold 100 Stow-on-the-Wold CP Cotswold 190 King's Stanley CP Stroud 13 11 Andoversford CP Cotswold 101 Swell CP Cotswold 191 Kingswood CP Stroud 12 Ashley CP Cotswold 102 Syde CP Cotswold 192 Leonard Stanley CP Stroud 13 Aston Subedge CP Cotswold 103 Temple Guiting CP Cotswold 193 Longney and Epney CP Stroud 89 111 53 14 Avening CP Cotswold 104 Tetbury CP Cotswold 194 Minchinhampton CP Stroud 116 15 Bagendon CP Cotswold 105 Tetbury Upton CP Cotswold 195 Miserden CP Stroud 16 Barnsley CP Cotswold 106 Todenham CP Cotswold 196 Moreton Valence CP Stroud 17 Barrington CP Cotswold 107 Turkdean CP Cotswold 197 Nailsworth CP Stroud 31 18 Batsford CP Cotswold 108 Upper Rissington CP Cotswold 198 North Nibley CP Stroud 19 Baunton
    [Show full text]
  • Stunning Barn Conversion on the Edge of the Village
    Stunning barn conversion on the edge of the village. The Cartshed, Leonard Stanley, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire Freehold Entrance Hall • Kitchen/Breakfast Room • Utility Room • Cloakroom • Sitting/Dining Room • Store Room • 3 Bedrooms • 2 Bathrooms (1 en suite) • Garage/Shed • Courtyard and Lawned Gardens • Private Parking Distances Stroud has comprehensive Stonehouse 2 miles, (London leisure and shopping facilities Paddington 90 minutes), as well as a mainline rail link to Stroud 4 miles, Cheltenham 17 London Paddington. miles, M5 (Junction 13) 5.5 miles, (all distances and times Description approximate). The Cartshed is a stunning, period conversion of a beautiful Situation barn on the edge of the Leonard Stanley is a thriving popular village of Leonard small village with a primary Stanley. Primarily arranged on school nearby, a local Church, the ground floor there are two village pub, children’s play area double bedrooms and a and playing fields whilst local bathroom, Kitchen/breakfast shops can be found in adjoining room which gives access to the Kings Stanley which include a utility room and a cloakroom, useful Co-Operative grocery large sitting room with doors to store, Post Office, hair salon the courtyard garden at the and another recently re- front. Upstairs there is another opened public house. Local bedroom and bathroom. country walks can be enjoyed Externally there is a large within easy distance of the private courtyard which gives property. The M5 and J13 is a ample parking and to the side relatively short drive away is a large lawned area which is while there is a bus route too. fenced and private.
    [Show full text]
  • Severn Tidal Tributaries Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk We Are the Environment Agency
    Severn Tidal Tributaries Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 managing flood risk We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Sapphire East 550 Streetsbrook Road, Solihull, B91 1QT Tel: 0870 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. December 2009 Introduction I am pleased to introduce our summary of the Severn Tidal Tributaries Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP). This CFMP gives an overview of the flood risk in the Severn Tidal Tributaries catchment and sets out our preferred plan for sustainable flood risk management over the next 50 to 100 years. The Severn Tidal Tributaries CFMP is one of 77 CFMP’s 2,562 properties and 6,000 people at risk in the for England and Wales. Through the CFMP’s, we have catchment in a 1% flood event. However, it is expected assessed inland flood risk across all of England and that both of these figures could rise quite significantly Wales for the first time. The CFMP considers all types within the next 100 years by which point some 3,720 of inland flooding, from rivers, ground water, surface properties and 7,000 people could be affected by water and tidal flooding, but not flooding directly flooding in a 1% event.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanteos Estate Records, (GB 0210 NANTEOS)
    Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Cymorth chwilio | Finding Aid - Nanteos Estate Records, (GB 0210 NANTEOS) Cynhyrchir gan Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Argraffwyd: Mai 04, 2017 Printed: May 04, 2017 Wrth lunio'r disgrifiad hwn dilynwyd canllawiau ANW a seiliwyd ar ISAD(G) Ail Argraffiad; rheolau AACR2; ac LCSH This description follows NLW guidelines based on ISAD(G) Second Edition; AACR2; and LCSH https://archifau.llyfrgell.cymru/index.php/nanteos-estate-records archives.library .wales/index.php/nanteos-estate-records Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Allt Penglais Aberystwyth Ceredigion United Kingdom SY23 3BU 01970 632 800 01970 615 709 [email protected] www.llgc.org.uk Nanteos Estate Records, Tabl cynnwys | Table of contents Gwybodaeth grynodeb | Summary information .............................................................................................. 3 Hanes gweinyddol / Braslun bywgraffyddol | Administrative history | Biographical sketch ......................... 3 Natur a chynnwys | Scope and content .......................................................................................................... 4 Trefniant | Arrangement .................................................................................................................................. 5 Nodiadau | Notes ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Pwyntiau
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Stanley, Leonard Stanley Eastington, Frampton on Severn, Fretherne, Saul, Arlingham, Whitminster, Moreton Valence, Standis
    Neighbourhood Warden Service Kings Stanley, Leonard Stanley Eastington, Frampton On| + Severn, Fretherne, Saul, Arlingham, Whitminster, Moreton Valence, Standish and Stonehouse. Warden: Andy Beamish Month: August, 2017 On duty for 25 shifts Visits to Local Residents: Anti social behaviour Ann Wicks Rd, Frampton on Severn, visited 15 properties to speak to residents regarding reports of anti social behaviour. Visit to Selsley Hill resident regarding overgrown hedge. Delivery of recycle bin x2 residents Saul, Stonehouse. Burdett Rd report of nuisance in early hours by film crew. Visits to vulnerable people: Delivery of shed alarm Beeches Close Kings Stanley. Removed a tree stump for resident Starling Court, Stonehouse. Concern for safety check Eastington lock. Request for advice for resident Sherborne House. Spoke to gentleman sleeping in rear of his vehicle A38 Moreton Valence. Liaise with Partner Agencies: Safeguarding review meeting Beeches Green. Incidents of Anti-Social Behaviour: Fly tipping x 7 Leonard Stanley Pavillion Marsh Rd. SDC car park Stonehouse behind recycle bank ( x2 ).Park Rd Stonehouse, Selsley common ( x2 ) Dead animals - None Fly posting removal - None Page 1 of 2 Abandoned vehicles - None Graffiti - None Dog fouling complaints - None Litter x 3 reported A38 Eastington, A38 Moreton Valence bins overflowing. Patrols Conducted: Patrols conducted of all areas. Needle removed from alleyway Stonehouse. Directed Patrols: Woodcock Lane Stonehouse reports of motorbikes driving along path at the top. Checked access across railway line Sydney, Little Australia, Stonehouse, following concern from resident, Car Park enforcement SDC car park Stonehouse, Car being advertised for sale on highway Moreton Valence. Delivered noise monitoring form Moreton Valence. Access dispute Leonard Stanley.
    [Show full text]
  • Fretherne with Saul Village Plan “A Community Vision” Flyer Questionnaire 2002
    FFrreetthheerrnnee wwiitthh SSaauull PPaarriisshh VViillllaaggee PPllaann TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 The What ...........................................................................................................................................................1 The Why ............................................................................................................................................................1 HISTORY AND SETTING .......................................................................................... 2 FRETHERNE WITH SAUL PARISH PROFILE 2004................................................. 4 Population and Household numbers ..................................................................................................................4 Population Demographics .............................................................................................................................4 Employment.......................................................................................................................................................8 Employment status........................................................................................................................................8 Farms .................................................................................................................................................................9 Traffic and Travel ............................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]