TEMEX RESOURCES CORP. 1660-141 Adelaide Street West Toronto, CANADA M5H 3L5 tel: 416-862-2246 fax: 416-862-2244 website: www.temexcorp.com email: [email protected]

Assessment Report on the

Temex Resources Corp.

Latchford Gold Project

2009-2010 Exploration Program

Latchford, Ontario

Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario

NTS 31M/04, 31M/05

Karen Kettles, M.Sc., P.Geo. January 18, 2011 Project Geologist Temex Resources Corp. 1.0 Summary

From November 18 to 23, 2009 and June 9 to 23, 2010 an exploration program of structural and geological mapping, mobile metal ion leach (MMI) sampling, and rock sampling was performed over several gridlines in the - Latchford region of by Temex Resources Corp. Samples were collected on Temex claims belonging to the Brett and BH Properties of the Latchford Gold Project (“LGP”).

The LGP is situated within the Cobalt Embayment of the Southern Province, which occurs at the boundary between the Superior Province to the northwest and the Grenville Province to the southeast. Most of the project area is underlain by Proterozoic sedimentary rocks, represented by the 2.5 to 2.2 Ga Huronian Supergroup. The Huronian rocks, consisting mainly of Gowganda Formation conglomerates and Lorrain Formation sandstones, unconformably overlie the Archean Superior Province, and importantly from the point of view of base and precious metal exploration, windows of greenstone belts are exposed within the Cobalt Embayment. The windows of Archean ultramafic to felsic intrusive rocks and mafic to felsic volcanic rocks are exposed in the northern portion of the Brett Property, and the majority of the current sampling was focussed near unconformable contacts of Proterozoic sediments with Archean volcanics and intrusions.

Mineralization in the LGP area has been proposed to be the gold analogue to the high grade five- element (“Ni-Co-As-Ag-Bi”) vein systems in the Cobalt silver mining camp just to the north, associated with the Archean - Proterozoic unconformity. The model considers the possibility that the numerous, largely undeformed, discordant precious and base metal mineralized post-Archean vein systems scattered over a large areal extent throughout the early Proterozoic-aged Cobalt Embayment are interrelated and formed as part of a large-scale regional hydrothermal system confined to the Proterozoic cover sequence and the underlying Archean basement. The genetic model suggests the geological setting may be suitable for the genesis of large zones of polymetallic precious and base metal mineralization localized near the Proterozoic-Archean unconformity. The occurrence of numerous base metal and precious metal vein and sulphide bodies in the immediate area may indicate the presence of larger bodies of mineralization localized at the unconformity contact. These features indicate the properties are in a geological setting that has the potential to contain large zones of polymetallic precious and base metal mineralization localized near the Proterozoic-Archean unconformity, as well as having the potential to host gold enriched five-element veins.

The current mapping, MMI and rock sampling program was carried out to further evaluate the area of anomalous gold mineralization outlined by Temex in 2008 and 2009, which is concentrated in two zones in an area north of the Brett boulder (6,222 g/t Au). In this area an inlier of Archean volcanics is surrounded by Proterozoic sediments. Work by Temex in 2009 over this area included linecutting, a geochemical soil survey over the northern part of the Brett Property, a more detailed prospecting and sampling program over the northern part of the LGP, and a Titan 24 IP Survey over part of the grid. Using the IP chargeability inversion models and the DC resistivity association, a total of eight first priority targets or anomalous zones were identified for follow-up at the LGP, from near surface to approximately 400 meters depth. The

i results from the mapping, MMI and rock sampling along with the IP results were evaluated and used to prioritized future drill targets.

The mapping indicated that the area over which the IP survey was completed contains three main fracture directions. The strongest and most commonly occurring fracture set encountered was the steeply dipping northwest-southeast set which appears to parallel the Latchford Fault passing underneath Johnson Lake. The next most common fracture set was one which had an approximate north strike, and may be related to the series of major north-striking transform faults which occur up to the Quebec border. The least frequent fractures observed in the field were the northeast striking fractures. The gold values obtained from samples to date above 1 g/t gold indicates that gold occurs in all three fracture sets with none of the fracture/vein directions standing out as a preferred orientation. The best occurrence of gold (110.26 g/t Au, sample 5937) with associated specular hematite was in a northwest-southeast fracture in close proximity to the footwall diabase contact. The next highest assay of 50.61 g/t gold within the same general area occurred in conglomerate but had much less hematite and a north-east strike orientation. The geology and gold bearing structures within the Archean exposure area appear quite different than that in the conglomerates west of Johnson Lake but may both still be shallow-level expressions of a one larger plumbing system at depth. The orientation of the diabase sill is proposed to be south dipping, but this should be confirmed with future drilling. The mapping also indicated that the depth to the Proterozoic unconformity is approximately at 150 to 300 m below surface in this area.

The current MMI and rock sampling program was centered over the same area subjected to IP testing. A total of 196 MMI samples and 36 rock samples were collected during the program from active Temex claims. MMI samples were analyzed for gold, silver, arsenic, bismuth, cobalt, copper, and nickel. Rock samples were analyzed for gold and also 34 element ICP. From the MMI samples, using response ratio calculations, the following results were obtained: 23 samples were anomalous for gold, 19 samples were anomalous for silver, 26 samples were anomalous in arsenic, 21 samples carried anomalous values for bismuth, 12 samples were anomalous for cobalt, 12 samples were anomalous for copper, and 4 samples were anomalous for nickel. Of the 36 rock samples, 17 returned anomalous gold results, 1 sample was anomalous for silver, 2 samples were anomalous in bismuth, 7 samples were anomalous in cobalt, and 5 samples returned anomalous values for copper. The anomalous MMI and rock samples are not necessarily coincident with the IP anomalies outlined in early 2010, but they are confined between IP anomalies 1, 2, 4 and 5.

The anomalous results from these three gridlines along with the vein orientations and IP results were evaluated. An initial six priority 1 areas were indicated for follow-up drilling, and two priority 2 areas. These evaluations were based primarily on coincident IP, MMI and rock anomalies. Drill holes should be proposed using these target areas and taking into consideration the local structures and geology.

ii TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Summary...... i 2.0 Introduction...... 1 3.0 Property Description, Location and Access...... 1 4.0 Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography...... 3 5.0 Geological Setting...... 5 5.1 Regional Geology ...... 5 5.2 Property Geology...... 5 5.3 Mineralization and Model...... 8 6.0 Recent Exploration History...... 10 7.0 Current Program...... 13 7.1 Sample Collection, Preparation, Analysis, and Security ...... 14 7.1.1 MMI Sampling...... 14 7.1.2 Rock Sampling...... 15 8.0 Results...... 15 8.1 Geological Discussion ...... 16 8.2 Analytical Discussion ...... 17 8.3 MMI Results ...... 18 8.4 Rock Sampling Results ...... 18 9.0 Recommendations and Conclusions ...... 24 10.0 References...... 26

List of Figures Figure 1: Location of Latchford Gold Project and Brett and BH Properties...... 2 Figure 2: Latchford Gold Project Claims with 2009-2010 Outcrops, MMI and Rock Samples .4 Figure 3: Regional Geology of the Latchford Gold Project (Geology from Map P3581 (Ayers et. al, 2006))...... 6 Figure 4: Geological Model for Exploration on the Latchford Gold Project...... 9 Figure 5: Bubble Plot of Au Response Ratios on IP Chargeability with IP Anomalies...... 19 Figure 6: Bubble Plot of Cu Response Ratios on IP Chargeability with IP Anomalies ...... 20 Figure 7: Bubble Plot of Ag Response Ratios on IP Chargeability with IP Anomalies...... 21 Figure 8: Bubble Plot of As Response Ratios on IP Chargeability with IP Anomalies ...... 22 Figure 9: Bubble Plot of Au from Rock Samples with MMI and IP Anomalies on Total Magnetic Background...... 23 Figure 10: Proposed Drilling Target Areas on IP Chargeability Background...... 25

List of Tables Table 1: List of Claims Exploration Work was performed on from the LGP ...... 3 Table 2: Target Areas for Drilling ...... 24

List of Appendices Appendix I: MMI Sample Locations and Statistics Appendix II: Rock Samples, Locations and Data Appendix III: Assay Certificates

List of Maps Map 1: Latchford Gold Project 2010 MMI and Rock Sampling Plan: All Sample locations with grid 1:5,000 (Back Pocket).

Map 2: Latchford Gold Project 2009 and 2010 Mapping: Outcrops, Structures, and Contacts 1:3,000 (Back Pocket).

ii Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

2.0 Introduction

From November 18 to 23, 2009 and June 9 to 23, 2010 an exploration program consisting of structural and geological mapping, mobile metal ion leach (MMI) sampling, and rock sampling was completed by Temex Resources Corp. (“Temex”) over several gridlines in the Temagami - Latchford region of northeastern Ontario (Figure 1). The grid was previously cut and sampled by Temex on several claims belonging to the Brett and BH Properties of the Latchford Gold Project (LGP) (Kettles, 2010a and b). Mapping and sampling was carried out by Temex personnel.

The mapping was conducted over the north part of the grid, in an area west of Johnson Lake in order to examine the numerous recently discovered gold occurrences (Kettles, 2009, 2010b) and their relation to the various bedrock fracture orientations. The attitude and more precise location of geological contacts were also determined in the field where possible. These relationships are important to document as they are a reflection of larger prospective northeast and east-southeast possible cross-faults/graben structures which may potentially have localized Cu-Co-Ag-Au mineralization within the region.

A total of 196 MMI soil samples were collected from 3 sampling lines. Samples were collected at 5 m intervals over known IP geophysical targets and associated anomalous gold values in rock samples and at 25 m intervals in areas with rock and/or soil samples with anomalous gold values. All samples were obtained from locations upon claims owned by Temex. MMI Samples were sent to SGS Canada Inc., located in Toronto Ontario, and were analyzed for Ag (ppb), Au (ppb), As (ppb), Bi (ppb), Co (ppb), Cu (ppb), and Ni (ppb).

As well, a total of 36 rock samples were collected over 7 gridlines in the northern part of the grid. All samples were grabs, and in areas of bedrock that was previously not sampled. The rock samples were sent to Swastika Laboratories Ltd., located in Swastika, Ontario, and were analyzed for Au (g/t) using a fire-assay with an AA finish. The pulps were then sent to Assayers Canada, of Vancouver B.C., and analyzed for 34 element ICP.

This report documents the work that was undertaken and the results obtained from this program.

3.0 Property Description, Location and Access

The LGP comprises several distinct blocks or properties of contiguous claims which cover a large area in northeastern Ontario, extending north of the town of Temagami up to the town of Latchford, and farther west and north to the town of Matachewan. At present the LGP consists of 34,160 acres in 8 properties. The current mapping and sampling programs filed in this submission occurred on two properties within the LGP, the Brett and BH Properties, which are located within the townships of Gillies Limit South and Gillies Limit North. The properties are located north of the town of Temagami and just immediately south of the town of Latchford. Latchford is 32 km north of Temagami, which is located approximately 100 km north of the city of North Bay (Figure 1). North Bay is located 450 km north of Toronto along highway 11. The properties of interest are centered on latitude 47°15' 43'' N and longitude 79°45'46'' E within the 1:50,000 NTS map sheets 31M/04 and 31M/05.

Temex Resources Corp. 1 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

Figure 1: Location of Latchford Gold Project and Brett and BH Properties

Temex Resources Corp. 2 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

Claims on which work occurred are located in the Larder Lake Mining Division. The claims on the properties are contiguous and the MMI sampling and rock sampling extended over four claims (Figures 2 and 3, Table 1), while the mapping extended over two additional claims (3302903-904), and all claims are 100% owned by Temex Resources Corp.

Table 1: List of Claims Exploration Work was performed on from the LGP

Claim Due Date Recording Date Units Township

3007439 2012-Jan-08 2004-Jan-08 10 Gillies Limit North 3011807 2011-Mar-25 2004-Mar-25 16 Gillies Limit South 3003902 2011-Aug-23 2004-Aug-23 8 Gillies Limit South

3003903 2011-Aug-23 2004-Aug-23 2 Gillies Limit South

3003904 2011-Oct-04 2004-Oct-04 2 Gillies Limit South 3003905 2011-Oct-04 2004-Oct-04 2 Gillies Limit South

The Brett and BH Properties are transected and accessible by Highway 11, and other access is via well-established secondary gravel roads traversing either east or west from Highway 11, various logging roads and trails, and by a service road to the Trans Canada Pipeline.

4.0 Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The climate of the Latchford area is continental in nature, with cold winters (-10°C to -35°C) and warm summers (+10°C to +35°C). Seasonal variations affect exploration to some extent (geological mapping cannot be done in the winter, geophysics and drilling are best done at certain times of the year, etc.), but the climate will not significantly hamper mining operations.

The settlements of Sudbury, Timmins, New Liskeard and North Bay are relatively close; these all have the necessary equipment and trained personnel to support exploration and mining activities. The property has very good access to infrastructure. A major hydro line transects the property, water is abundant, and the property area spans Highway 11. The mineral rights held by Temex give them the right to mine ore discovered on their property, subject to a 400' surface rights reservation around all lakes and rivers, and a 300' surface reservation around major roads (this may be waived by the Crown).

The property has a gently rolling to locally rugged topography with maximum relief on the order of 100 m. Much of the region has been logged so present forests are typically second growth; mixtures of jack pine, spruce, birch and poplar are common.

Temex Resources Corp. 3 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

Figure 2: Latchford Gold Project Claims with 2009-2010 Outcrops, MMI and Rock Samples

Temex Resources Corp. 4 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

5.0 Geological Setting

5.1 Regional Geology

The LGP straddles portions of Gillies Limit, Best, Cassels and Brigstocke Townships. The most recent and comprehensive regional mapping of these townships include OGS mapping of Gillies Limit, and Brigstocke townships (Born and Hitch, 1990), Brigstocke and Kittson townships (Born and Burbridge, 1997), Cassels and Riddell townships (Born, 1989) and the western portion of Best Township (Smyk et al., 1997). Thomson (1968) mapped the geology immediately adjacent to Highway 11 in eastern Best and southern Gillies Limit townships. The southernmost portion of the LGP area lies within this latter area of mapping. The most recent compilation map, P3581 (Ayers et al., 2006), incorporated the above mapping as well as re-interpretation from the work produced in the Geology of Ontario maps (Jackson and Fyon, 1991).

The LGP is situated within the Cobalt Embayment of the Southern Province, which occurs at the boundary between the Superior Province to the northwest and the Grenville Province to the southeast. The term Cobalt Embayment refers to the large irregular domain of Paleo-Proterozoic (2.5–2.2 Ga) siliciclastic sedimentary rocks (i.e., the Huronian Supergroup) that unconformably overlies Archean basement rocks of the Abitibi greenstone belt. The regional geology of the Latchford Project surrounding the Brett and BH Properties is shown in Figure 3. Most of the project area is underlain by the Huronian Supergroup belonging to the Southern Structural Province. The Huronian rocks unconformably overlie the Superior Province Archean rocks, and importantly from the point of view of base and precious metal exploration, windows of greenstone belts are exposed within the Cobalt Embayment. The windows of Archean ultramafic to felsic intrusive rocks and mafic to felsic volcanic rocks are exposed in the northern, northeastern, southern and southwestern areas of the embayment.

The Huronian Supergroup in this area is predominantly represented by the Cobalt Group. The Cobalt Group is subdivided primarily into the Gowganda Formation, dominated by a distinctive coarse conglomerate, and the Lorrain Formation, dominated by sandstones. It is intruded by the 2219 Ma Nipissing diabase (Bennett et al., 1991), which is the term given to a voluminous suite of gabbro/diabase sills and dikes which intrudes the Huronian from Cobalt to Sault Ste Marie, and is very common in the project area. Diabase and lamprophyre dikes cut both Archean and Proterozoic rocks in the region.

5.2 Property Geology

The oldest rocks on the LGP are Archean mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks of the Abitibi greenstone belt. Rock types include pillow basalts, fine-grained and plagioclase-phyric mafic flows, variolitic and amygdaloidal basalt and andesite. These rocks are exposed in a window of Proterozoic rocks in the north part of the Brett Property (Figure 3). Subsequent volcanism resulted in the deposition of intermediate to felsic volcanic rocks, including dacite, rhyolite and their pyroclastic equivalents. These rocks are of limited extent, but are also exposed in the north part of the Brett Property, east of Island Lake. Subsequent plutonism during the Kenoran Orogeny (Born and Hitch, 1990) resulted in the emplacement of felsic to intermediate intrusive rocks. These include granite, dioritic to gabbroic intrusive rocks, tonalite, granodiorite and minor pegmatite.

Temex Resources Corp. 5 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

Figure 3: Regional Geology of the Latchford Gold Project (Geology from Map P3581 (Ayers et. al, 2006))

Temex Resources Corp. 6 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

These rocks are exposed in most of the LGP, and occur mainly on the western part of the LGP of this report (Figure 3).

Ultramafic intrusive and mafic intrusive rocks underlie much of the area immediately surrounding the south part of the Brett Property and the north part of the Rib Lake Property. These intrusive rocks, which include fine-grained peridotite, coarse-grained pyroxenite, and medium-grained gabbro, are observed in weak shear contact with mafic volcanic rocks. Archean rocks in the property area exhibit weak east-west trending foliations that dip steeply to the north and south.

Proterozoic rocks, including sedimentary rocks, Nipissing diabase and lamprophyre dikes underlie the remainder of the project area. Proterozoic sedimentary rocks of the Huronian Supergroup unconformably overlie the Archean basement, and in this area include the Gowganda Formation and the Lorrain Formation of the Cobalt Supergroup. The Gowganda Formation is further subdivided into the lower Coleman Member and the upper Firstbrook Member. The Coleman Member unconformably overlies Archean basement rocks and is composed primarily of a basal conglomerate of glaciofluvial origin. Sedimentary rocks of the Firstbrook Member conformably overlie Coleman Member rocks and include laminated siltstone, mudstones and arenites. Lorrain Formation sedimentary rocks conformably overlie Firstbrook Member sediments and consist mainly of arkoses. Both Firstbrook Member and Lorrain Formation sedimentary rocks are thought to have been deposited as marine clastic wedges in a series of cratonic sedimentary basins (Born and Hitch, 1990). Little deformation is evident in the Proterozoic sedimentary rocks. The sediments are typically gently folded about broad open northwest-southeast and east-west trending fold axes related to the Penokean Orogeny (Figure 3). On the LGP, Firstbrook and Coleman Member sediments are folded about north to northwest trending fold axes and are flat-lying or dip very gently to the northeast.

Nipissing Diabase dikes and sills intrude Archean and Proterozoic rocks throughout the project area. The main occurrence of these within the property is located in the Island Lake to Johnson Lake to the Hound Chute Lake area (Born and Hitch, 1990; Figure 3) in the northern part of the Brett Property. Emplacement of the Nipissing Diabase (2219 Ma) occurred in an extensional basin/rift environment. The Rift Valley is expressed by large-scale normal movement along northwest-trending faults, including the Montreal River and Cross Lake fault systems. Nipissing diabase and gabbro intrusives were likely funnelled through conduits created by this rifting event. Late diabase dikes belonging to the Sudbury Dike Swarm trend 335º and cut all Archean and Proterozoic rocks in the area. Post-Proterozoic lamprophyre dikes occur throughout the area, typically as northerly trending 1-3 metre wide dikes.

The surficial geology of the LGP area and the Brett property within is dominated by till and significantly lesser amounts of glaciofluvial/glaciolacustrine sediments and organic deposits (Veillette, 1986). Ice flow indicators such as striations are biased south to south-southeast, the direction of ice movement during deglaciation in the late Wisconsin (23,000 to 10,000 years before present; Veillette and McClenaghan, 1996).

Temex Resources Corp. 7 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

5.3 Mineralization and Model

The Latchford Gold Project was initiated in January of 2004 following the discovery from prospecting of bonanza-style gold mineralization (6222 g/t Au) within a calcite vein hosted in a block of rock south of Latchford, Ontario. This gold mineralized vein/block of rock is hereafter referred to as the Brett boulder (Figure 3). The unusual nature of the ore and vein material, which included cobaltite, pentlandite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, and a bismuth-tellurium-sulphur-bearing mineral (Taylor, 2004) associated with gold in the Brett boulder, coupled with a geological setting analogous to the Cobalt silver mining camp prompted Temex to develop a model for gold mineralization and exploration. Mineralization in the Brett boulder is proposed to be the gold analogue to the high grade five-element (“Ni-Co-As-Ag-Bi”) vein systems in the Cobalt silver mining camp just to the north, associated with the Archean - Proterozoic unconformity. The model considers the possibility that the numerous, largely undeformed, discordant precious and base metal mineralized post-Archean vein systems scattered over a large areal extent throughout the early Proterozoic-aged Cobalt Embayment are interrelated and formed as part of a large-scale regional hydrothermal system confined to the Proterozoic cover sequence and the underlying Archean basement (Taylor and Campbell, 2004). The genetic model suggests the geological setting may be suitable for the genesis of large zones of polymetallic precious and base metal mineralization localized near the Proterozoic-Archean unconformity. Figure 4 illustrates this model.

The properties of the LGP were acquired by staking and three option agreements following the discovery of the Brett boulder, based on their location and prospectivity for precious and base metal mineralization. The Properties were selected for the LGP due to: i) the occurrence on the Properties of flat-lying Proterozoic sediments in unconformable contact with the underlying Archean basement, ii) proximity to the Montreal River fault system which has extensive vertical movement; vertical movement is important as it juxtaposes different rocks types giving rise to favourable conditions for metal dumping when oxidized hydrothermal fluids come in contact with reduced environments such as Archean basement, iii) the occurrence of numerous base metal and precious metal vein and sulphide bodies in the immediate area suggests an increase in overall metal content, v) the basal Gowganda Formation underlying the Properties provides sufficient permeability for the circulation of hydrothermal fluids, and vi) the presence of Nipissing Diabase which may act as a cap- rock over the permeable Gowganda Formation sediments.

These features indicate the properties are in a geological setting that has the potential to contain large zones of polymetallic precious and base metal mineralization localized near the Proterozoic- Archean unconformity, as well as having the potential to host gold enriched five-element veins.

In addition to the main Au-Proterozoic unconformity model the area is also prospective for other types of mineralization including Cu-Ni-PGE mafic/ultramafic intrusive style mineralization, and gold enriched five-element veins associated with Nipissing intrusions.

Temex Resources Corp. 8 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2011

Figure 4: Geological Model for Exploration on the Latchford Gold Project

Temex Resources Corp. 9 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

6.0 Recent Exploration History

The Latchford Gold Project and the immediate area surrounding have a history of prospecting performed from the early 1950’s to the early 1970’s. Numerous silver, copper, nickel, gold, and some molybdenum and Pb-Zn showings were identified. The majority of exploration and development work has centered around highway 11, mainly to the south near the Temagami Nickel and Net Lake Nickel-Copper showings. Other exploration has concentrated further to the north of the LGP, centered in the Cobalt silver occurrences. The central area covered by the LGP and encompassing the Brett Property and south part of the BH Property has not been explored as extensively as the other areas. The Temagami Land Caution effectively smothered mineral exploration over the entire area from 1972 onwards. By 1978, all exploration activities were curtailed via government order. As a result Best, Brigstocke, Banting, and Gillies Limit Townships were then closed off for claim staking and subsequent mineral exploration. The “caution” on Brigstocke, Banting and Gillies Limit Townships was lifted in 1996. The following is a summary of work carried out on the Brett Property and the south part of the BH Property within the LGP.

1956 Temagami Mining Company Limited performed an electrical resistivity survey over the Mountain Lake area in Best Township. They identified two extensive zones of low resistivity trending east to northeast beneath Mountain Lake. These could possibly coincide with the aeromagnetic highs identified by Norcan Resources in 1997 (see below).

1960 The Geological Survey of Canada released a widely spaced airborne magnetometer survey which identified two strong magnetic anomalies over the present day Brett Property.

1962 Ralph Benner drilled 3 short holes on present day claim 4243548. All three holes intersected Cobalt conglomerate, however hole 1 intersected the contact of the Conglomerate with the Nipissing Diabase sill, which contained minor chlorite gauge and minor disseminated pyrrhotite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and hematite. No samples were taken, and no further work was recorded for this area. The contact zone of the conglomerate with the diabase did not seem to contain any major mineralization, based on a very brief log description.

1964 Northwest Canalask Nickel Mines conducted a ground magnetometer survey which located numerous magnetic anomalies. This was follow-up work suggested by R. Benner.

1964 Moreau Woodard & Company conducted a Turam Electromagnetic Survey over the same claim group mentioned above with generally poor results.

1964 Earl F. Rector drilled 7 short holes on the northwest corner of current claim 3011807. Most holes were 122 feet (37 m) long and all hit basic igneous rock, no mineralization was noted. The holes were drilled north of a swamp.

1968 Thomson mapped the Highway 11 corridor over the north part of Best Township and South Gillies Limit Township (Thomson, 1968).

Temex Resources Corp. 10 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

1970-71 Copperville Mining Corporation Ltd. held ground in the northern part of the Brett Property, over claims 3003902, 3003903, and 3003904. A combined ground magnetometer and VLF-EM survey was carried out. No magnetic anomalies were located, but two anomalous conductive zones were noted. They drill tested these anomalies in 1971, drilling a total of 5 short holes over their property. Hole 1, testing anomaly 1 outlined by their VLF-EM survey, intersected gabbroic and basic intrusives, and hit a calcite vein at 283.7 feet which assayed 2.4 oz/ton Ag over 3 inches. Sub- anomalous Cu was noted (0.02%) in disseminated sulphides in gabbro at 250 feet. Most holes intersected gabbroic rocks, except for hole 3 (claim 3003904) which intersected some vuggy conglomerate and granitic intrusions. Hole 5 had several samples taken, in disseminated sulphide mineralization in gabbro and quartz veins in altered gabbro, but no assay results were given. The gabbro is possibly diabase, while the conglomerate would be the Cobalt conglomerate. A Nipissing diabase sill is located 200 m to the south of the drill collars.

1971 Lobo Mines and Exploration acquired a group of claims on the northeast corner of the Brett Property boundary in 1971. They performed a magnetometer and VLF survey in the spring of 1971, which outlined one large VLF-EM conductor trending NW under Johnson lake, and 3 smaller conductors trending E-W. Minor magnetic lows were associated with all conductors. Lobo Mines drill tested the VLF-EM anomalies with five drill holes totaling 2,070 feet (630.94 meters). These holes are located mainly in present day claim 4243548. Results of the drilling program were generally poor. Narrow intersections with weakly anomalous Ag values were returned, with a best result of 4.6 oz/ton Ag over 0.17 feet (0.05 meters) from calcite stringers in Nipissing Diabase. The best intersection, returned from hole 71-3 in Nipissing diabase just within the diabase /conglomerate contact, was 2 inches of 4.6 oz/ton Ag and 0.5 feet of 0.4 oz/ton Ag and 0.17 feet of 0.3 oz/ton Ag all at 220 feet depth in a zone of fracturing near the contact of Huronian conglomerate with the Nipissing diabase. None of the other holes intersected the contact.

1971 Lobo Mines completed two more holes, hole 72-6 was drilled from the same spot as 71- 3, but at a different azimuth, and intersected 3 feet of 0.11 oz/ton Ag in calcite veinlets/fractures at the contact of the conglomerate with the diabase. Hole 72-7 also hit the contact of the Huronian Conglomerate with the Nipissing diabase, further to the northeast, the mineralization noted here was less, best intersection of 0.5 feet of 0.03 oz/ton Ag. No other elements appeared to be assayed for except silver. Lobo Mines carried out a ground geological mapping program in the summer of 1972 over the above claims to further verify previous work. The geologist, R. Thomson, noted small veinlets of chalcopyrite and hematite in conglomerate were noted just east of the southeast corner of present day claim 3003902, but no samples were taken. No follow-up work appears to have been done following this geological mapping. In the course of his investigation he noted the northwest trending Montreal River Fault system did not appear important for Ag-Co veins, but thought the NE lineaments were of interest.

1972-96 Government-imposed Temagami Land Caution.

Temex Resources Corp. 11 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

1987-88 Brigstocke and Kittson townships were subsequently mapped by the OGS in 1987 (Born and Burbidge, 1997), covering a western piece of the Brett Property. Mapping by the OGS over the Bay Lake Area was carried out in 1988, which covers the northeast part of the Brett Property (Born and Hitch, 1990).

2002-03 Temex Resources initially explored the area to the north of Temagami for diamonds. In 2002 they completed a ground magnetic and EM survey over several claims in South Gillies Limit Township. They performed a regional mobile metal ion leach (MMI) sampling program over the Little Hardwood Lake Claim Group as part of the Wilson Lake Diamond project, this area is now the western part of the Brett Lake Property. In 2003 they carried out a separate till sampling program on some of the present day property as well as to the south to aid in exploration for diamonds.

2003-04 Temex carried out prospecting in the Brett Property area in 2003, and discovered the Brett Boulder (6,222 g/t Au) in November. Temex staked the Brett property during the Dec. 2003 to Oct. 2004. Following the staking, reconnaissance mapping and prospecting was completed over the western portion of the Brett Property. The exploration program to was initiated in the summer of 2004, and its purposed was to discover the source of the mineralized block. The program consisted of grid cutting, soil sampling, grid mapping, prospecting, ground magnetic and induced polarization (IP) surveys, structural mapping and diamond drilling over the eastern portion of the Brett Property. The best results from the geological mapping and diamond drilling completed on the Brett grid in the area of the Brett boulder confirmed the presence of anomalous gold mineralization (up to 765 ppb), and locally elevated copper (up to 1720 ppm), nickel (up to 2040 ppm), cobalt (up to 15 ppm), and arsenic (up to 201 ppm) in the underlying Archean mafic to ultramafic intrusive and volcanic rocks.

Temex completed a regional prospecting program over the northern part of the LGP in 2007. In 2008 Temex carried out an airborne magnetic and TEM survey over most of the northern part of the LGP. EM anomalies detected were investigated on the ground during a subsequent prospecting and sampling program conducted in the summer and fall of 2008. This prospecting program outlined several significant areas of gold mineralization located within 6 km north and south of the original high grade gold discovery site, which are suggestive of Archean mineral deposit types. Results included individual random grab samples grading: 31.03 g/t gold; 15.36 g/t gold; 1,060 g/t silver, 3.87% lead and 2.58% zinc; 1.88 g/t palladium, 0.58% nickel, 0.30% copper and 0.11% cobalt; 1.29 g/t gold and 1.68% copper; 7.19% molybdenum. The best results were concentrated in two zones in an area north of the Brett boulder, where an inlier of Archean volcanics is surrounded by Proterozoic sediments. This area is the main focus of the current program.

In 2009 Temex focussed exploration on the area of anomalous gold mineralization north of the Brett boulder. Work completed included linecutting, a geochemical soil survey over the northern part of the Brett Property, a more detailed prospecting and sampling program over the northern part of the LGP (Kettles, 2010a and b), and Titan 24 IP Survey over part of the grid (Izarra et.al., 2010). The linecutting totalled 68.8 kms over twenty one claims owned by Temex, and 1051 B- Horizon soil samples were collected from this grid, which were analyzed for Au and a suite of 34 ICP elements. Using the results, a total of twenty-five targets were generated including twelve

Temex Resources Corp. 12 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010 priority one targets (samples with multi-element anomalies, and samples with strong anomalies). The targets were used to further define the location of the IP survey.

The sampling and prospecting program was initiated to determine the extent of the gold in bedrock trend discovered in the north part of the Brett Property in the 2007-2008 regional prospecting program by Temex. The 2009 sampling and prospecting confirmed the previous results found in the two zones north of the Brett Boulder, and expanded the extent of the gold mineralization. The two zones are close to the Archean-Proterozoic unconformity contact. Area 1 appears to be represented by Au rich quartz veins and veinlets within Archean volcanics and intrusives. Area 2 is exemplified by Au rich, and Au-Cu rich rusty fractures and veinlets within Huronian Conglomerates which are close to the unconformable contact with the Archean volcanics and intrusives. The anomalous results from these two areas were used to confine an area where an IP survey was subsequently performed.

The IP survey consisted of four Titan-24 DC/IP single spreads (L2400E, L3400E, L3600E and L3800E) each covering 1.55 line kilometres over the project area. Using IP chargeability inversion models and the DC resistivity association, a total of eight first priority targets or anomalous zones were identified for follow-up at the LGP, from near surface to approximately 400 meters depth. The interpreted anomalous zones are potentially related to structural features and associated gold mineralization which were identified primarily based on strong to moderate IP anomalies and the strong low resistive anomalies. The MMI sampling and grid rock sampling program was then proposed to further evaluate the IP anomalies. The mapping was conducted before the sampling to determine if gold mineralization is preferentially hosted by one main vein set or structure, which also would aid in proposed drill hole orientations. As well, mapping the contact of the unconformable Huronian basal conglomerates with the Archean boundary was a primary objective of this program. The results from the MMI sampling along with the rock sampling, structural mapping, and IP results will be evaluated and will aid in prioritizing future drill targets.

7.0 Current Program

A structural mapping program was conducted on the property from November 18 to 23, 2009. The mapping was conducted over the north part of the grid, in an area west of Johnson Lake in order to examine the numerous recently discovered gold occurrences and their relation to the various bedrock fracture orientations. The attitude and more precise location of geological contacts were also determined in the field where possible. Of special interest was the unconformable contact of the Huronian with the Archean rocks. These relationships are important to document as they are a reflection of larger prospective northeast and east-southeast possible cross-faults/graben structures which may potentially have localized Cu-Co-Ag-Au mineralization within the region. Historical work within the Cobalt and Gowganda camps indicate that mineralized vein systems tend to preferentially follow northeast striking fracture/fault zones either within or in close proximity to Nipissing Diabase intrusions. Thus the program focussed on documenting all structures to aid in prioritizing areas for drilling, and potential drill orientations.

From June 9 to 17, 2010 a mobile metal ion leach (MMI) sampling program was performed by Temex personnel over three gridlines in the Temagami - Latchford region of northeastern Ontario.

Temex Resources Corp. 13 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

A total of 196 MMI soil samples were collected from 3 sampling lines. Samples were collected at 5 m intervals over known IP geophysical targets and associated rock samples with anomalous gold values and at 25 m intervals in areas with rock and/or soil samples with anomalous gold values.

A concurrent rock sampling program was carried out from June 9 to 23, 2010, over several gridlines. A total of 36 rock samples were collected from this area. Emphasis was placed on sampling close to areas where the IP anomalies were identified, where important structures were noted, as well as sampling any altered, fractured, or mineralized rocks.

Figure 2 shows the general location of the samples. MMI samples were sent to SGS Canada Inc., located in Toronto Ontario, and were analyzed using a MMI 7 element package. The rock samples were sent to Swastika Laboratories, located in Swastika, Ontario, and were analyzed for Au g/t using a fire-assay method and also analyzed for a 34 element ICP package at Assayers Canada.

The objectives of the mapping, rock and MMI sampling program was to obtain additional information that could subsequently be used to assist in prioritizing potential drilling targets using the IP anomalies, structures and mineralization orientations, MMI anomalies, and anomalous rock samples that Temex obtained.

7.1 Sample Collection, Preparation, Analysis, and Security

A total of 196 MMI soil samples were collected during the program and analyzed for 7 elements using an MMI geochemical package. As well, 36 rock samples were taken and analyzed for Au using fire-assay. All samples were taken on Temex claims active at the time of the program and are documented herein. Samples were obtained using the cut grid described above. Locations for each MMI sample were recorded using grid coordinates and then translated into UTM coordinates, while the rock sample locations were recorded with a handheld GPS unit. The location of the MMI and rock samples in UTM Nad 27 Zone 17 coordinates, northern hemisphere, is given in Appendices I and II; sample stations are plotted on Map 1 (back pocket) and shown generally on Figure 2.

7.1.1 MMI Sampling

MMI samples were obtained by scraping away the upper 10 cm of the surface soil layer, and then taking a “composite” sample of the material between 10 to 25 cm depth using a steel garden spade. The material collected was between 250 to 350 g in weight, and was put into a clean labelled plastic bag. The samples were shipped to SGS Laboratories in Toronto, Ontario.

At SGS, the samples are exposed to weak solutions of organic and inorganic compounds. The MMI solutions contain strong ligands, which detach and hold in solution the metal ions that were loosely bound to soil particles by weak atomic forces. The extraction does not dissolve the bound forms of the metal ions. Thus, the metal ions in the MMI solutions are the chemically active or ‘mobile’ component of the sample. Because these mobile, loosely bound complexes are in very low concentrations, measurement is by conventional ICP-MS and the latest evolution of this technology, ICP-MS Dynamic Reaction Cell (DRC II). A MMI seven element package was used,

Temex Resources Corp. 14 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010 and these elements consisted of Ag (ppb), Au (ppb), As (ppb), Bi (ppb), Co (ppb), Cu (ppb), and Ni (ppb). The certificates of the assay results for the MMI samples are included in Appendix II.

7.1.2 Rock Sampling

The rock sampling was selective; any quartz - calcite +/- hematite veins, gold, silver, or sulphide mineralization was sampled, as well as any alteration, gossan areas, altered or mineralized fractures, veins or contacts. Within the area of the sampling, rock types were noted and recorded, and all vein and fracture measurements were documented.

Samples were placed into a plastic bag with one sample tag and marked on the outside of the bag with the unique sample tag number. These samples were transported to Swastika Laboratories located in Swastika, ON. Samples were crushed, split, and pulverized to >80% minus 100 mesh. Analyses consisted of a fire assay for gold with an AA finish. A 5 g prepared sample was sent from Swastika Laboratories to Assayers Canada in Vancouver, B.C., where a suite of 34 elements were analyzed by ICP-AES with an aqua regia digestion. Gold was reported in grams per tonne (g/t), most other elements were reported in ppm except for Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, S, and Ti which were reported in percent.

8.0 Results

Appendix I documents the MMI samples, their descriptions and results, and their locations in UTM coordinates (UTM is in NAD 27, Zone 17 coordinates). Rock sample descriptions, results, and locations are presented in Appendix II. Sample stations are plotted on Map 1 and shown generally on Figure 2. Rock outcrops, contacts, and structural measurements are plotted on Map 2. The certificates for the assay results for the MMI Samples are included in Appendix III. The rock samples assay result certificates are located in Appendix IV.

Mapping was centered over the Archean-Huronian contact, and extended from L1800 E to L3800 E, and north of the Baseline 4500 N.

MMI samples were centered over the lines L3400 E, L3600 E, and L3800 E, between 2675 North to 5400 North. A total of 196 MMI samples were taken on or close to the grid lines, and the samples were taken consistently between 10 and 25 cm depth.

Rock samples were collected between lines L2400 E to L2600 E and from L3200 E to L3800 E, between 4500 to 4800 N and 5200 to 5800 N. 2400 East to 3800 East, and north of the baseline 4500 N.

The grid lines were mapped and subsequently sampled for MMI analysis and lithogeochemistry to aid in prioritizing drill targets previously outlined by the IP geophysical results (Izarra et. al., 2010). The IP program outlined a total of twenty-three target zones, sixteen of which were classified as high priority targets, and seven target zones which were classified as second priority. From this work a total of twenty-eight drill holes were recommended to test the targets interpreted in the property. However, it was noted that the interpreted IP anomalies (and zones) may not necessarily be directly related to gold and sulphide dissemination. Other sources, such as iron-rich

Temex Resources Corp. 15 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010 formations, graphite and clay fault systems could produce similar DC and IP responses. Thus the mapping can aid in prioritizing the IP targets. The MMI and rock sampling results can be used to indicate which of the targets do have the potential to contain mineralization, based on the anomalous results. Associated anomalous values may indicate the presence of high grade precious metal veins associated with the Archean-Proterozoic unconformity at depth, which in turn may represent the surface expression of leakages from a “blind” gold-copper rich deposit at or near the unconformity surface. Thus analytical focus is on samples and trends with anomalous gold, copper, silver, and cobalt values, and associated anomalous nickel, bismuth, and arsenic.

8.1 Geological Discussion

The main structural feature evident in the area is the Latchford Fault which is a major northwest- southeast trending structure (130-145°) and part of the Montreal River Fault System that lies parallel to and most likely part of the Timiskaming Rift system. Relatively flat lying Huronian sediments unconformably overlie poorly exposed Archean granites and lesser volcanic rocks. Younger Nipissing Diabase intrusions have intruded all lithologies and occur as irregular dykes and sills throughout the region. An interpretation carried out by consulting geophysicist Roman Tykjalo on the previously acquired bouger anomaly data has indicated that prospective northeast and east-southeast possible cross-faults and/or graben structures may potentially have localized Cu-Co-Ag-Au mineralization within the region. Historical work within the Cobalt and Gowganda camps indicate that mineralized vein systems tend to preferentially follow northeast striking fracture-fault zones either within or in close proximity to Nipissing Diabase intrusions.

The area examined west of Johnson Lake was found to have three main fracture directions. The strongest and most commonly occurring fracture set encountered was the steeply dipping northwest-southeast (100° to 150°) set which appears to parallel the Latchford Fault passing underneath Johnson Lake. The next most common but less frequent fracture set had a northerly strike (350° to 20°). This fracture set is a common one in northern Ontario and may be related to the series of major north-striking transform faults (ie. Mattagami River Fault) which occur up to the Quebec border. The least frequent fractures observed in the field were the northeast striking fractures (40° to 80°). The fractures measured in the field are recorded on Map 2.

An examination of the gold values obtained from prospecting to date above 1 g/t gold indicates that gold occurs in all three fracture sets with none of the fracture/vein directions standing out as a preferred orientation. Quartz veining is rather sparse throughout the area mapped but was noticeably more common along with sulphide mineralization within the Archean mafic to intermediate volcanics and granitoid intrusives. The quartz veining observed had strike directions of northeast and southeast and as well as occurred as relatively flat extensional veinlets with disseminated pyrite commonly occurring in the adjacent wall-rock. Scattered specular hematite occurrences noted on OGS maps 2551 and 2552 of the Bay Lake Area (Born and Hitch, 1990) proximal to the Nipissing Diabase intrusions suggest that the Johnson Lake area occurrences are not uncommon but their more unique association with significant gold values certainly warrants further exploration. The best occurrence of specular hematite along with the highest gold value of 110.26 g/t (sample 5937) was in southeast trending fractures in close proximity to the footwall diabase contact. The next highest assay of 50.61 g/t gold (sample 5936) within the same general

Temex Resources Corp. 16 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010 area within conglomerates had much less hematite and a north-east strike orientation. The geology and gold bearing structures within the Archean exposure area appear quite different than that in the conglomerates west of Johnson Lake but may both still be shallow-level expressions of a one larger plumbing system at depth.

The attitude of the Nipissing Diabase sills on the property has not been clearly established yet. The airborne magnetic maps appear to indicate that the sill is at least in-part fairly steeply dipping. The OGS geology maps for the Bay Lake Area suggest that the southern contact is the top of the sill, however, this is not consistent going further eastward. The contacts of the Nipissing Diabase often coincide with low-lying valleys/depressions in the field. One contact area on the gas pipeline appeared to support either a steep dip or a south dipping contact. In addition, fine grained and chilled Diabase contacts were observed south of the Archean area on the northern Diabase contact which, according to OGS Report 276 (Born and Hitch, 1990), defined the lower contact of the intrusion. However, previous drilling north of the diabase – Huronian contact encountered fine- grained mafic intrusive rocks which may be diabase, indicating the sill dips northerly. This attitude needs to be clarified with further magnetics and/or drilling results.

The north-northwest striking unconformity between Archean and overlying Gowganda Formation conglomerates was mapped in with a GPS, southwest of the Highway 11. The basal contact of the clast supported and somewhat brecciated-looking basal conglomerate was not directly exposed but the conglomerate was often observed within a few metres of Archean outcroppings. There was no measurable bedding along this contact but clasts in it appeared to be fairly flat-lying. An average 10° north-east dip for unconformity in the area was used to estimate an approximate unconformity depth of 150 metres centered under the gold occurrences west of Johnson Lake. Using the steepest bedding dips in the area of approximately 20° NE would result in an unconformity depth of roughly 300 metres in the same area. The depth to the unconformity contact is essential to establish in that possible unconformity style Au-Cu mineralization could occur in this area. This is important for the placement of future drill holes to test the vein mineralization, as well as the potential unconformity style Au mineralization.

8.2 Analytical Discussion

The theory behind MMI sampling indicates that the MMI process is measuring the concentration of mobile metal ions in surface soils. The mobile metal ions are released from buried ore bodies or mineralization, and then travel upwards towards the surface. The MMI analysis or process then measures these ions in the surface soils. From the geochemical results obtained, a response ratio is calculated for the individual elements. Elements with higher response ratios are more indicative of that element being present in abundance at depth. The response ratio is key to highlight the anomalous samples from background samples, to reduce the effects of dissolution variables, and to reduce the effects of sampling in different regolith units. Response ratios are calculated by taking the mean (average) of the lowest quantile (25%) of analytical data for each element. The mean of the lowest quantile represents the background for that element. The response ratio for that element from each sample is then the analytical result divided by the background value. Where results for samples were below detection limit half the value of the detection limit was substituted for use in statistical analysis.

Temex Resources Corp. 17 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

Using the above methods of calculations and looking at the seven elements analyzed for by the MMI process, the background elements and means of the lowest quantile of analytical data are presented in table 2 (Appendix I). In looking at the response ratios, only values with a response ratio of greater than 5 were considered anomalous. Using statistical analysis, the background values used to obtain the response ratios were the following: Au-0.05 ppb, Ag-2.76 ppb, As-12.82 ppb, Co-42.14 ppb, Cu-396.6 ppb, Ni-129.62 ppb, and Bi-0.5 ppb. In the calculations, two elements (Au and Bi) determined a mean that was equal to the value of “below detection limit” for the analyses.

Rock samples were considered anomalous in gold if the value was greater than or equal to 0.25 g/t Au. All other element anomalous thresholds are presented in section 8.3 below.

8.3 MMI Results

From a total of 196 MMI samples, the following was noted from the response ratio calculations: 23 samples were anomalous for Au, 19 samples were anomalous for Ag, 26 samples were anomalous in As, 21 samples carried anomalous values for Bi, 12 samples were anomalous for Co, 12 samples were anomalous for Cu, and 4 samples were anomalous for Ni. Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8 plot the anomalous values for the response ratios of Au, Cu, Ag, and As respectively. The samples are presented as bubble symbols, with the IP Chargeability background.

The results from the three elements response ratios show similar clustering for gold and copper, but varying responses for silver. Arsenic corresponds to some of the gold and copper anomalies, and some of the silver anomalies. Not all MMI anomalies correspond with the IP anomalies. The strongest gold and copper anomalies are situated on Line 3400 E between the IP trends L-4 and L- 2, and just north of the IP trend L-5. As well, gold and copper demonstrate strong MMI anomalous values on line 3800 E, to the south of IP anomaly L-4, and are situated in between of where the trends of L-1 and/or L-5 is projected.

8.4 Rock Sampling Results

The additional rock sampling was carried out over the newly cut gridlines, and a total of 17 out of 36 samples returned anomalous gold assay results. 1 sample was anomalous for silver (>5 ppm Ag), 2 samples were anomalous in bismuth (>16 ppm Bi), 7 samples were anomalous in cobalt (>500 ppm Co), and 5 samples returned anomalous values for copper (> 500 ppm Cu). All of the anomalous values were taken from outcrops of conglomerate which contained rusty fractures, consisting of weathered hematite veinlet. The veinlets or fractures varied from NE striking with a steep south dip, to E-W striking with a steep dip either north or south, and in a few cases more WNW striking with a steep southerly dip. The only sample which contained anomalous silver was from quartz-carbonate veining in mafic volcanic in the northwest part of the grid, in an area off the main IP target area. This sample (#5513) was also anomalous for lead and bismuth. Figure 9 presents the anomalous gold results of the rock samples as bubble plots, along with the Au and Cu MMI results, all of which are located with respect to the IP chargeability anomalies. For the purposes of this report no other elements were plotted, as the main interest is in the gold results.

Temex Resources Corp. 18 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

Figure 5: Bubble Plot of Au Response Ratios on IP Chargeability with IP Anomalies

Temex Resources Corp. 19 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

Figure 6: Bubble Plot of Cu Response Ratios on IP Chargeability with IP Anomalies

Temex Resources Corp. 20 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

Figure 7: Bubble Plot of Ag Response Ratios on IP Chargeability with IP Anomalies

Temex Resources Corp. 21 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

Figure 8: Bubble Plot of As Response Ratios on IP Chargeability with IP Anomalies

Temex Resources Corp. 22 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

Figure 9: Bubble Plot of Au from Rock Samples with MMI and IP Anomalies on Total Magnetic Background

Temex Resources Corp. 23 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

The results from the gold rock samples indicate three areas or clusters of anomalous gold mineralization. From figure 9 it is evident that samples on L3200 E form a distinct cluster, and could be an extension of the IP anomaly L-2. Samples from this cluster returned assays varying from 0.25 g/t to 11.94 g/t Au. Two clusters of anomalous Au in samples are indicated on L3600 E, the northern cluster contains three samples which returned assays of 9.77 g/t Au, 3.43 g/t Au, and 1.97 g/t Au respectively. This cluster occurs north of IP anomaly L-4, and could be interpreted to be on a NEE trend from the anomalous MMI Au samples on L3400 E, also north of IP anomaly L- 4. The second cluster of anomalous samples in Au on L3600 E is approximately 150 m south of the northern cluster, and returned assays of 1.06 g/t Au and 1.58 g/t Au. This cluster is located on an interpolated NEE trend from IP anomaly L-5, and is close to an anomalous MMI sample in Au on L3600 E.

9.0 Recommendations and Conclusions

The mapping, rock and MMI sampling program conducted on the Brett and BH Properties of the LGP had one main purpose, which was to aid in prioritizing targets for follow-up drilling of the Induced Polarization ("IP") anomalies. The MMI anomalies identified are not strong targets on their own, but combined with the structural mapping, the IP results and the rock sampling results can be used to focus on drill targets. Most of the anomalous results are between Line 3400 E and L3800 E, between 4990 and 4500 North.

From the results it appears that IP anomalies L-2, L-4, L-5, and L-1 are viable targets for drilling. A total of eight broad target areas have been defined using the results from the MMI sampling, the rock sampling (including previous samples pre-2010), the vein trends, and the IP data and previous priority 1 IP targets suggested by Izarra et al. (2010). The eight target areas are listed in table 2, and their rough locations given. As well, the data used to pick these targets is listed. Figure 10 shows the location of the target areas picked. All of the priority 1 targets in table 2 should be further defined by incorporating available structural and geological data.

Table 2: Target Areas for Drilling Target Line Northings Priority Comments A L3400 E 4725 to 4825 N 1 High MMI Au and Cu RR, north of IP anomaly L‐4 B L3400 E 4650 to 4725 N 1 High MMI Au and Cu RR, north of IP anomaly L‐5 C L3600 E 4900 to 5000 N 1 High MMI Au, IP anomaly, gold in rock anomaly to S, veins strike north into target D L3600 E 4650 to 4750 N 1 High Au in rocks, veins strike north to NW, dipping west, High MMI Au RR E L3800 E 4900 to 5050 N 1 High MMI Au and Cu RR, IP anomaly F L3800 E 4800 to 4900 N 1 High MMI Au, IP anomaly G L3800 E 4700 to 4800 N 2 High MMI Au and Cu RR H L3225 E 4800 to 4900 N 2 High Au in rocks, veins strike ENE to NE

Temex Resources Corp. 24 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

Figure 10: Proposed Drilling Target Areas on IP Chargeability Background

Temex Resources Corp. 25 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

10.0 References

Aeroquest, 2008. Report on a Helicopter-Borne AeroTEM System Electromagnetic and Magnetic Survey. Block A and B Project, New Liskeard, ON. NTS 31M04.05. Job#08-093 for Temex Resources Corp.

Assessment files. OGS Website: http:\\www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca

Ayers, J.A., Chartrand, J.E., Grabowski, G.P.D., Josey, S., Rainsford, D. and Trowell, N.F. 2006. Geological compilation of the Cobalt–Temagami area, Abitibi greenstone belt; Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3581, scale 1:100 000.

Bennett, G., Dressler, B.O. and Robertson, J.A. 1991. The Huronian Supergroup and associated intrusive rocks. In Geology of Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4, Part 1, pp.549-591.

Born, P. 1989. Precambrian geology, Cassels and Riddell townships; Ontario Geological Survey Report 271, 81 p.

Born, P. and Burbidge, G.H. 1997. Precambrian Geology, Brigstocke and Kittson Townships; Ontario Geological Survey, Report 275. 55 p.

Born, P. and Hitch, M. W. 1990. Precambrian Geology, Bay Lake Area; Ontario Geological Survey Report 276, 81 p.

Izarra, C., Perera, S., and Martinez, E., 2010. Assessment Report: Titan – 24 DC/IP Surveys over the Latchford Project, Ontario, Canada for Temex Resources Corporation, Toronto, Ont.

Jackson, S.L. and Fyon, J.A. 1991. The Western Abitibi Sub-province in Ontario; in Geology of Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4, Part 1, p. 405-482.

Kettles, 2009. Assessment Report on the Temex Resources Corp. Latchford Gold Project, 2007- 2008 Prospecting Program, Latchford, Ontario, Larder Lake and Sudbury Mining Divisions, Ontario, NTS 31M/04 and 31M/05.

Kettles, 2010a. Assessment Report on the Temex Resources Corp. Brett Property, 2009 Linecutting and Soil Sampling Program, Latchford, Ontario, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario, NTS 31M/04, 31M/05.

Kettles, 2010b. Assessment Report on the Temex Resources Corp. Latchford Gold Project, 2009 Prospecting Program, Latchford, Ontario, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario, NTS 31M/04, 31M/05.

Sexton, A., Tykajlo, R., Willett, B., and Kettles, K. 2004. Report on the Temex Resources Corp. Brett Property, Summer-Fall 2004, Exploration Program, Latchford, Ontario, Larder Lake and Sudbury Mining Divisions, Ontario, NTS 41 M/4 and 5.

Temex Resources Corp. 26 Latchford Gold Project 2009-2010 Exploration Program January 18, 2010

Smyk, M.C., Born, P. and Owsiacki, L. 1991. Geology and mineral potential of Banting Township and the western part of Best Township, District of Nipissing. Ontario Geological Survey Geological Open File Report 5806, 163 p.

Smyk, M.C., Born, P. and Owsiacki, L. 1997. Precambrian geology, Banting Township and the western part of Best Township. Ontario Geological Survey Geological Report 285, 53 p. and Map 2613.

Taylor, R. January, 2004. Mineralogy and Paragenesis of a High-grade Gold Sample (#75690) from Gilles Township. Technical Report for Temex Resources Corp. 13 p.

Taylor, R. and Campbell, I. 2004. A Unifying Exploration Model for the Genesis of Precious- and Base-Metal Mineralization in the Cobalt Embayment of Northern Ontario; (exploration Update #3). Report prepared for Temex Resources Corp. 17 p.

Thomson, R. 1968. Geology Adjacent to Highway 11 in Best Township and the South Part of Gillies Limit Township; Districts of Timiskaming and Nipissing. Open File Report No. 5016, 72 p.

Veillette, J.J. 1986. Surficial geology, Haileybury, Ontario-Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada, Map 1642A, scale 1:100,000.

Veillette, J.J. and McClenaghan, M.B. 1996. Sequence of glacial flows in Abitibi-Timiskiming; implications for mineral exploration and dispersal of calcareous rocks from the Hudson Bay basin, Quebec and Ontario. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 3033, map scale 1:500,000.

Temex Resources Corp. 27

Statement of Qualifications

I, Karen R. Kettles of 18 Vintage Way, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6L3 do hereby certify that:

1) I am a practising member of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (since 2003).

2) I am a graduate of the University of Alberta and hold an Honours Bachelor of Science (Geology) Degree, 1982.

3) I am a graduate of the University of New Brunswick with a degree of M.Sc. in Geology, 1987.

4) I am a Canadian Citizen.

5) I have been employed as an exploration geologist, project manager and GIS manager by several mining companies and government organizations since 1985 and have worked primarily in Ontario and New Brunswick since that time.

Dated this 18th day of January, 2011.

______Karen R. Kettles, MSc, P.Geo.

APPENDIX I

MMI Sample Locations and Statistics

Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Grid Grid NAD 27 NAD 27 Sample No. Easting Northing East Northing Depth cm Color Moisture Notes LabID Ag ppb Au ppb 34-1 593423 5234805 15 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-1 4 0.2 34-10 593414 5234745 15 grey-brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-10 3 0.4 34-11 593412 5234740 12 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-11 3 0.9 34-12 593418 5234736 13 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-12 4 0.1 34-13 593416 5234730 18 grey-brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-13 3 0.05 34-14 593408 5234725 18 grey-brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-14 3 0.1 34-15 593420 5234720 19 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-15 2 0.2 34-16 593416 5234715 14 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-16 2 0.05 34-17 593411 5234710 14 rust brown Moist Silt/Sand 34-17 3 0.1 34-18 593420 5234692 11 rust brown Moist Silt/Sand 34-18 7 4 34-19 593416 5234684 11 brown Moist Sand 34-19 1 0.3 34-2 593422 5234800 14 grey-brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-2 3 0.1 34-3 593420 5234795 16 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-3 8 5.8 34-4 593425 5234785 14 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4 2 0.3 34-4665 3400 4665 593400 5234665 19 brown Wet Sand 34-4665 7 0.2 34-4670 3400 4670 593400 5234670 15 rust brown Wet Sand 34-4670 6 0.2 34-4680 3400 4680 593400 5234680 13 rust brown Moist Sand 34-4680 3 0.3 34-4810 3400 4810 593400 5234810 15 brown Dry Sand 34-4810 4 0.4 34-4815 3400 4815 593400 5234815 12 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 34-4815 3 0.1 34-4820 3400 4820 593400 5234820 11 grey-brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4820 4 0.05 34-4825 3400 4825 593400 5234825 11 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 34-4825 5 0.05 34-4830 3400 4830 593400 5234830 15 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 34-4830 6 0.05 34-4835 3400 4835 593400 5234835 16 brown Dry Sand 34-4835 3 0.1 34-4840 3400 4840 593400 5234840 16 brown Dry Sand 34-4840 4 0.05 34-4845 3400 4845 593400 5234845 22 brown Dry Silt/Sand 34-4845 4 0.05 34-4850 3400 4850 593400 5234850 15 brown Dry Sand 34-4850 6 0.05 34-4855 3400 4855 593400 5234855 22 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 34-4855 7 0.05 34-4860 3400 4860 593400 5234860 21 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 34-4860 13 0.1 34-4865 3400 4865 593400 5234865 20 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4865 3 0.05 34-4870 3400 4870 593400 5234870 20 Brown Dry Sand 34-4870 15 0.05 34-4875 3400 4875 593400 5234875 17 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 34-4875 9 0.05 34-4880 3400 4880 593400 5234880 17 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 34-4880 5 0.05 34-4885 3400 4885 593400 5234885 12 Brown Dry Sand 34-4885 9 0.05

Page 1 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Grid Grid NAD 27 NAD 27 Sample No. Easting Northing East Northing Depth cm Color Moisture Notes LabID Ag ppb Au ppb 34-4890 3400 4890 593400 5234890 18 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4890 83 0.1 34-4895 3400 4895 593400 5234895 12 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4895 64 0.05 34-4900 3400 4900 593400 5234900 18 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4900 20 0.05 34-4905 3400 4905 593400 5234905 13 brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4905 20 0.05 34-4910 3400 4910 593400 5234910 12 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4910 18 0.05 34-4915 3400 4915 593400 5234915 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4915 8 0.05 34-4920 3400 4920 593400 5234920 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4920 5 0.05 34-4925 3400 4925 593400 5234925 16 Brown Dry Sand 34-4925 8 0.2 34-4930 3400 4930 593400 5234930 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4930 7 0.2 34-4935 3400 4935 593400 5234935 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4935 5 0.05 34-4940 3400 4940 593400 5234940 11 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4940 3 0.05 34-4945 3400 4945 593400 5234945 16 Brown Dry pebbly Sand 34-4945 3 0.05 34-4950 3400 4950 593400 5234950 17 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4950 3 0.05 34-4955 3400 4955 593400 5234955 17 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4955 15 0.1 34-4960 3400 4960 593400 5234960 19 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4960 6 0.1 34-4965 3400 4965 593400 5234965 19 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4965 11 0.05 34-4970 3400 4970 593400 5234970 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4970 10 0.4 34-4975 3400 4975 593400 5234975 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4975 5 0.05 34-4980 3400 4980 593400 5234980 20 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4980 4 0.1 34-4985 3400 4985 593400 5234985 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4985 6 0.05 34-4990 3400 4990 593400 5234990 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4990 8 0.05 34-4995 3400 4995 593400 5234995 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-4995 6 0.05 34-5 593433 5234775 15 Brown Dry sand 34-5 4 0.2 34-5000 3400 5000 593400 5235000 15 Brown Dry sand 34-5000 4 0.05 34-5025 3400 5025 593400 5235025 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-5025 4 0.3 34-5050 3400 5050 593400 5235050 11 Brown Dry sand 34-5050 6 0.2 34-5075 3400 5075 593400 5235075 12 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-5075 4 0.3 34-5100 3400 5100 593400 5235100 12 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-5100 2 0.1 34-5325 3400 5325 593400 5235325 16 Brown Dry sand 34-5325 9 0.3 34-5350 3400 5350 593400 5235350 15 Brown Dry sand 34-5350 13 0.1 34-5375 3400 5375 593400 5235375 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-5375 27 0.05 34-5400 3400 5400 593400 5235400 15 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-5400 6 0.05 34-6 593434 5234762 19 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-6 5 0.5

Page 2 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Grid Grid NAD 27 NAD 27 Sample No. Easting Northing East Northing Depth cm Color Moisture Notes LabID Ag ppb Au ppb 34-7 593436 5234755 17 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-7 8 0.4 34-8 593436 5234750 17 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-8 9 0.05 34-9 593416 5234748 15 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 34-9 4 0.2 3610-4500 3610 4500 593610 5234500 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 3610-4500 17 0.2 36-4505 3600 4505 593600 5234505 15 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4505 19 0.05 36-4510 3600 4510 593600 5234510 13 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4510 9 0.05 36-4515 3600 4515 593600 5234515 17 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4515 9 0.05 36-4520 3600 4520 593600 5234520 19 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4520 9 0.05 36-4525 3600 4525 593600 5234525 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4525 12 0.05 36-4530 3600 4530 593600 5234530 20 grey-brown Dry Sand 36-4530 10 0.05 36-4535 3600 4535 593600 5234535 21 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4535 10 0.05 36-4540 3600 4540 593600 5234540 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4540 8 0.1 36-4545 3600 4545 593600 5234545 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4545 18 0.05 36-4550 3600 4550 593600 5234550 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4550 8 0.05 36-4555 3600 4555 593600 5234555 16 Brown Dry Pebbly Sand 36-4555 14 0.05 36-4560 3600 4560 593600 5234560 11 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4560 5 0.05 36-4565 3600 4565 593600 5234565 9 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4565 5 0.05 36-4570 3600 4570 593600 5234570 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4570 14 0.2 36-4575 3600 4575 593600 5234575 13 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4575 5 0.1 36-4580 3600 4580 593600 5234580 16 Brown Dry Pebbly Sand 36-4580 6 0.05 36-4585 3600 4585 593600 5234585 12 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4585 7 0.05 36-4590 3600 4590 593600 5234590 12 grey-brown Moist Sand 36-4590 11 0.1 36-4595 3600 4595 593600 5234595 11 grey-brown Wet Pebbly Sand 36-4595 10 0.05 36-4600 3600 4600 593600 5234600 17 grey-brown Moist Pebbly Sand 36-4600 11 0.2 36-4610 3600 4610 593600 5234610 20 grey-brown Moist Pebbly Sand 36-4610 5 0.05 36-4615 3600 4615 593600 5234615 22 grey-brown Moist Gravel/Sand 36-4615 31 0.05 36-4620 3600 4620 593600 5234620 17 grey-brown Dry Pebbly Sand 36-4620 9 0.1 36-4625 3600 4625 593600 5234625 17 grey-brown Moist Sand 36-4625 12 0.05 36-4630 3600 4630 593600 5234630 21 grey-brown Dry Pebbly Sand 36-4630 14 0.05 36-4635 3600 4635 593600 5234635 12 grey-brown Dry Pebbly Sand 36-4635 5 0.05 36-4640 3600 4640 593600 5234640 16 rust brown Dry Pebbly Sand 36-4640 8 0.2 36-4645 3600 4645 593600 5234645 14 grey-brown Moist Gravel/Sand 36-4645 15 0.05 36-4650 3600 4650 593600 5234650 22 grey-brown Moist Sand/silt 36-4650 2 0.05

Page 3 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Grid Grid NAD 27 NAD 27 Sample No. Easting Northing East Northing Depth cm Color Moisture Notes LabID Ag ppb Au ppb 36-4655 3600 4655 593600 5234655 22 grey-brown Moist Sand/silt 36-4655 3 0.05 36-4660 3600 4660 593600 5234660 16 brown Moist Sand/silt 36-4660 19 0.1 36-4665 3600 4665 593600 5234665 15 grey-brown Moist Sand/silt 36-4665 20 0.1 36-4670 3600 4670 593600 5234670 15 grey-brown Wet Gravel/Sand 36-4670 13 0.05 36-4675 3600 4675 593600 5234675 15 brown Moist Gravel/Sand 36-4675 11 0.2 36-4680 3600 4680 593600 5234680 18 grey-brown Moist Sand/silt 36-4680 3 0.05 36-4685 3600 4685 593600 5234685 18 rust brown Moist Gravel/Sand 36-4685 12 0.05 36-4690 3600 4690 593600 5234690 11 rust brown Moist Sand 36-4690 3 0.05 36-4700 3600 4700 593600 5234700 14 Brown Dry Sand 36-4700 5 0.3 36-4705 3600 4705 593600 5234705 12 Brown Dry Sand/silt 36-4705 0.5 0.05 36-4710 3600 4710 593600 5234710 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4710 6 0.2 36-4715 3600 4715 593600 5234715 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4715 6 0.05 36-4720 3600 4720 593600 5234720 12 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4720 5 0.1 36-4725 3600 4725 593600 5234725 17 Brown Dry Sand 36-4725 6 0.2 36-4730 3600 4730 593600 5234730 13 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 36-4730 2 0.05 36-4735 3600 4735 593600 5234735 17 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4735 4 0.2 36-4740 3600 4740 593600 5234740 14 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 36-4740 4 0.1 36-4745 3600 4745 593600 5234745 17 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4745 4 0.1 36-4950 3600 4950 593600 5234950 19 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 36-4950 2 0.05 36-4955 3600 4955 593600 5234955 22 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 36-4955 5 0.1 36-4960 3600 4960 593600 5234960 21 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 36-4960 2 0.6 36-4965 3600 4965 593600 5234965 18 Brown Dry Sand 36-4965 5 0.2 36-4970 3600 4970 593600 5234970 13 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 36-4970 2 0.05 36-4975 3600 4975 593600 5234975 9 rust brown Moist Silt/Sand 36-4975 2 0.05 36-4980 3600 4980 593600 5234980 10 grey-brown Moist Silt/Sand 36-4980 0.5 0.05 36-4985 3600 4985 593600 5234985 11 rust brown Moist Silt/Sand 36-4985 0.5 0.05 36-4990 3600 4990 593600 5234990 14 rust brown Moist Silt/Sand 36-4990 0.5 0.05 38-4715 3800 4715 593800 5234715 16 rust brown Moist Silt/Sand 38-4715 9 0.2 38-4720 3800 4720 593800 5234720 14 grey-brown wet Sand 38-4720 8 0.1 38-4725 3800 4725 593800 5234725 16 grey-brown wet Sand 38-4725 5 0.05 38-4730 3800 4730 593800 5234730 21 rust brown Moist Silt/Sand 38-4730 10 0.1 38-4735 3800 4735 593800 5234735 17 rust brown Moist Sand 38-4735 13 1.8 38-4740 3800 4740 593800 5234740 12 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4740 11 0.05

Page 4 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Grid Grid NAD 27 NAD 27 Sample No. Easting Northing East Northing Depth cm Color Moisture Notes LabID Ag ppb Au ppb 38-4745 3800 4745 593800 5234745 18 Brown Dry Sand 38-4745 17 0.2 38-4750 3800 4750 593800 5234750 15 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4750 19 0.05 38-4755 3800 4755 593800 5234755 15 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4755 7 0.05 38-4760 3800 4760 593800 5234760 18 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4760 6 0.05 38-4765 3800 4765 593800 5234765 12 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4765 39 0.1 38-4770 3800 4770 593800 5234770 13 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4770 14 1.3 38-4775 3800 4775 593800 5234775 13 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4775 11 0.05 38-4780 3800 4780 593800 5234780 19 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4780 5 0.1 38-4785 3800 4785 593800 5234785 17 Brown Dry Sand 38-4785 5 0.1 38-4790 3800 4790 593800 5234790 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4790 9 0.1 38-4795 3800 4795 593800 5234795 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4795 9 0.05 38-4800 3800 4800 593800 5234800 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4800 6 0.1 38-4805 3800 4805 593800 5234805 11 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4805 13 0.1 38-4810 3800 4810 593800 5234810 12 rust brown Moist Sand 38-4810 6 0.2 38-4815 3800 4815 593800 5234815 19 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4815 27 0.4 38-4820 3800 4820 593800 5234820 20 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4820 11 0.2 38-4825 3800 4825 593800 5234825 19 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4825 1 0.1 38-4830 3800 4830 593800 5234830 15 rust brown Moist Sand 38-4830 4 0.1 38-4835 3800 4835 593800 5234835 12 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4835 3 0.2 38-4840 3800 4840 593800 5234840 15 rust brown Moist Sand 38-4840 2 0.4 38-4845 3800 4845 593800 5234845 15 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4845 18 0.05 38-4850 3800 4850 593800 5234850 13 Brown Dry Sand 38-4850 6 0.1 38-4855 3800 4855 593800 5234855 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4855 2 0.05 38-4860 3800 4860 593800 5234860 16 Brown Dry Pebbly SAnd 38-4860 8 0.1 38-4865 3800 4865 593800 5234865 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4865 6 0.2 38-4870 3800 4870 593800 5234870 13 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4870 10 0.05 38-4875 3800 4875 593800 5234875 16 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4875 7 0.05 38-4880 3800 4880 593800 5234880 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4880 3 0.05 38-4885 3800 4885 593800 5234885 18 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4885 14 0.2 38-4890 3800 4890 593800 5234890 16 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4890 2 0.05 38-4895 3800 4895 593800 5234895 12 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4895 11 0.1 38-4900 3800 4900 593800 5234900 14 Brown Dry Sand 38-4900 10 0.2 38-4905 3800 4905 593800 5234905 14 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4905 5 0.2

Page 5 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Grid Grid NAD 27 NAD 27 Sample No. Easting Northing East Northing Depth cm Color Moisture Notes LabID Ag ppb Au ppb 38-4910 3800 4910 593800 5234910 14 Brown Dry Pebbly Sand 38-4910 0.5 0.2 38-4915 3800 4915 593800 5234915 11 Brown Dry Pebbly Sand 38-4915 5 0.2 38-4920 3800 4920 593800 5234920 12 Brown Dry Pebbly Sand 38-4920 8 0.3 38-4925 3800 4925 593800 5234925 12 Brown Dry Pebbly Sand 38-4925 6 0.1 38-4930 3800 4930 593800 5234930 13 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4930 6 0.2 38-4935 3800 4935 593800 5234935 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4935 16 0.3 38-4940 3800 4940 593800 5234940 17 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4940 7 0.2 38-4945 3800 4945 593800 5234945 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4945 7 0.2 38-4950 3800 4950 593800 5234950 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4950 12 0.2 38-4955 3800 4955 593800 5234955 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4955 10 0.2 38-4960 3800 4960 593800 5234960 18 Grey-Brown Moist Sand 38-4960 1 0.2 38-4965 3800 4965 593800 5234965 13 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4965 17 0.2 38-4970 3800 4970 593800 5234970 18 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-4970 11 0.6 38-4975 3800 4975 593800 5234975 15 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4975 15 0.05 38-4980 3800 4980 593800 5234980 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4980 4 0.05 38-4985 3800 4985 593800 5234985 15 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-4985 13 0.05 38-4990 3800 4990 593800 5234990 17 Grey-Brown Moist Sand 38-4990 11 0.05 38-4995 3800 4995 593800 5234995 17 Grey-Brown Wet silt/sand 38-4995 2 0.1 38-5000 3800 5000 593800 5235000 14 brown-Grey Moist silt/sand 38-5000 5 0.1 38-5005 3800 5005 593800 5235005 16 Grey-Brown Moist silt/sand 38-5005 4 0.05 38-5010 3800 5010 593800 5235010 16 Grey-Brown Wet silt/sand 38-5010 10 0.2 38-5015 3800 5015 593800 5235015 14 Grey-Brown Wet Sand 38-5015 6 0.1 38-5020 3800 5020 593800 5235020 12 Grey-Brown Moist silt/sand 38-5020 6 0.1 38-5025 3800 5025 593800 5235025 12 Grey-Brown Wet Sand 38-5025 19 0.05 38-5030 3800 5030 593800 5235030 17 Grey-Brown Moist Sand 38-5030 5 0.05 38-5035 3800 5035 593800 5235035 12 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-5035 10 0.1 38-5040 3800 5040 593800 5235040 19 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-5040 16 0.3 38-5045 3800 5045 593800 5235045 17 Brown Dry Silt/Sand 38-5045 16 0.1 38-5050 3800 5050 593800 5235050 18 Grey-Brown Moist Sand 38-5050 4 0.05 38-5055 3800 5055 593800 5235055 14 Brown Dry Gravel/Sand 38-5055 3 0.2 38-5060 3800 5060 593800 5235060 14 Grey-Brown Wet Sand 38-5060 2 0.05

Page 6 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Sample No. As ppb Co ppb Cu ppb Ni ppb Bi ppb Ag RR Au RR As RR Co RR Cu RR Ni RR Bi RR 34-1 5 46 1030 97 0.5 1401311 34-10 40 100 3660 243 1 1 8 329 22 34-11 20 64 1520 253 1 1 18 22422 34-12 30627802160.51221221 34-13 205688017811121212 34-14 5 26 1180 107 11201312 34-15 20 94 1350 148 11422312 34-16 206291018211121212 34-17 20388501510.51221211 34-18 50 184 4330 535 4 3 80 4411 4 8 34-19 200 316 1190 357 5 0 6167 3310 34-2 20 38 1660 120 0.5 1221411 34-3 20 43 28000 70 0.5 3 116 2171 11 34-4 50 63 4050 139 3 1 6 4110 1 6 34-4665 5 72 1290 159 0.5 3402311 34-4670 532930840.52401211 34-4680 5 17 2080 35 0.5 1 6 005 01 34-4810 60 75 6300 132 3 1 852 16 1 6 34-4815 2010694019221223214 34-4820 10596001370.51111211 34-4825 60 72 650 328 3 2 1 5 2236 34-4830 20 76 1130 246 0.5 2122321 34-4835 40 65 1350 386 11232332 34-4840 30306001800.51121211 34-4845 30 52 1830 281 0.5 11215 21 34-4850 30707101850.52122211 34-4855 60 115 1030 369 2 3 1 5 3334 34-4860 30 128 1020 640 2522335 4 34-4865 20745207920.5112216 1 34-4870 30 164 1080 354 1 5 124332 34-4875 301088004550.53123241 34-4880 30 83 1410 218 12122422 34-4885 60 63 1700 577 2 3 1 5 1444

Page 7 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Sample No. As ppb Co ppb Cu ppb Ni ppb Bi ppb Ag RR Au RR As RR Co RR Cu RR Ni RR Bi RR 34-4890 50 111 1070 586 2 30 24335 4 34-4895 20 98 1070 929 0.5 23 12237 1 34-4900 20 118 1080 413 1 7 123332 34-4905 5 52 630 256 0.5 7 101221 34-4910 30 104 1530 349 1 7 122432 34-4915 10669902930.53112221 34-4920 5286102830.52101221 34-4925 40 111 1110 322 13433322 34-4930 30 67 1070 224 0.5 3422321 34-4935 10444603070.52111121 34-4940 20944002460.51122121 34-4945 5215301460.51100111 34-4950 10521406290.5111105 1 34-4955 5 19 980 73 0.5 5 200211 34-4960 20338601730.52221211 34-4965 401197304760.54133241 34-4970 5 100 1890 110 0.5 4 8 025 11 34-4975 51214401840.52103111 34-4980 5386002170.51201221 34-4985 10513901480.52111111 34-4990 5172601610.53100111 34-4995 10514802130.52111121 34-5 5 54 1350 122 0.5 1401311 34-5000 205560018111121212 34-5025 40 112 1300 251 0.5 1 6 33321 34-5050 308597031912422222 34-5075 10 35 980 67 0.5 1 6 11211 34-5100 10 82 1740 186 21212414 34-5325 50 94 340 150 3 3 6 42116 34-5350 20 87 710 263 0.5 5 222221 34-5375 20 62 530 337 0.5 10 121131 34-5400 101348003190.52113221 34-6 10 14 2420 62 0.5 2 10 106 01

Page 8 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Sample No. As ppb Co ppb Cu ppb Ni ppb Bi ppb Ag RR Au RR As RR Co RR Cu RR Ni RR Bi RR 34-7 30 21 3480 172 0.5 3 8 209 11 34-8 30447901260.53121211 34-9 10 21 1380 86 0.5 1410311 3610-4500 10 41 950 115 0.5 6 411211 36-4505 20 71 740 333 1 7 122232 36-4510 5434002780.53101121 36-4515 10704801850.53112111 36-4520 30 61 1000 328 0.5 3121331 36-4525 10836101880.54112211 36-4530 101227003280.54113231 36-4535 301296503690.54123231 36-4540 10 87 1020 473 0.5 3212341 36-4545 10 65 1470 225 0.5 7 112421 36-4550 4013150018923133114 36-4555 20 67 330 318 0.5 5 122121 36-4560 20756901600.52122211 36-4565 208275026912122222 36-4570 30 49 810 94 1 5 421212 36-4575 110 112 980 158 2 2 2 9 3214 36-4580 5 69 1540 105 0.5 2102411 36-4585 5016665041813144232 36-4590 60 118 520 368 2 4 2 5 3134 36-4595 90 179 520 265 2 4 1 7 4124 36-4600 301088401700.54423211 36-4610 2016245048512124142 36-4615 50 154 440 253 0.5 11 144121 36-4620 50 149 1240 309 23244324 36-4625 40726006572413225 4 36-4630 60 148 600 532 3 5 1 5 4246 36-4635 60 134 500 317 0.5 2 1 5 3121 36-4640 70 143 600 213 3 3 4 5 3226 36-4645 100 207 660 508 3 5 1 85246 36-4650 308946049141122148

Page 9 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Sample No. As ppb Co ppb Cu ppb Ni ppb Bi ppb Ag RR Au RR As RR Co RR Cu RR Ni RR Bi RR 36-4655 5681001900.51102011 36-4660 170 263 910 890 4 7 2 13 6 2 78 36-4665 120 375 930 474 3 7 2 99246 36-4670 20 90 440 217 0.5 5 122121 36-4675 201138204090.54423231 36-4680 70 367 820 515 5 1 1 592410 36-4685 70 199 980 299 0.5 4 1 55221 36-4690 306724021811122122 36-4700 5 69 630 241 0.5 2 6 02221 36-4705 55458018820101114 36-4710 101297503890.52413231 36-4715 50 181 1240 460 32144346 36-4720 30757004700.52222241 36-4725 201388803690.52423231 36-4730 2073701970.51122021 36-4735 50 212 1110 365 21445 334 36-4740 20686003900.51222231 36-4745 30 192 2810 430 0.5 12257 31 36-4950 40 254 840 289 0.5 1 1 3 6 221 36-4955 40 196 1640 400 0.5 2 2 3 5 431 36-4960 10 669 1370 517 0.5 1 12 1 16 341 36-4965 5018268052922444244 36-4970 30 247 1090 440 0.5 1 1 2 6 331 36-4975 301235502790.51123121 36-4980 101461003200.50113021 36-4985 10 195 160 253 0.5 0 1 1 5 021 36-4990 201294701810.50123111 38-4715 10 175 6020 310 0.5 341415 21 38-4720 30 214 3090 457 0.5 3 2 2 5841 38-4725 50 139 1200 563 12143342 38-4730 60 71 1010 414 0.5 4 2 5 2331 38-4735 40 45 910 371 0.5 536 31231 38-4740 10 246 2020 238 0.5 4 1 1 6521

Page 10 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Sample No. As ppb Co ppb Cu ppb Ni ppb Bi ppb Ag RR Au RR As RR Co RR Cu RR Ni RR Bi RR 38-4745 5 67 720 156 0.5 6 402211 38-4750 30 55 890 594 0.5 7 12125 1 38-4755 70 59 710 420 2 3 1 5 1234 38-4760 509154025122142124 38-4765 20 126 2390 344 0.5 14 2236 31 38-4770 90 242 1580 549 2 5267 6 444 38-4775 301008802420.54122221 38-4780 5444901640.52201111 38-4785 30 212 260 369 0.5 2 2 2 5 131 38-4790 10884403180.53212121 38-4795 60 115 810 401 0.5 3 1 5 3231 38-4800 30654702070.52222121 38-4805 20 177 550 268 0.5 5 224121 38-4810 3019864032622425 234 38-4815 50 186 1370 237 0.5 10 8 44321 38-4820 4017755029314434122 38-4825 20674701500.50222111 38-4830 5019764027121245 224 38-4835 120 237 1060 225 4 1 4 96328 38-4840 70 353 1760 148 0.5 1 8 58411 38-4845 110 321 770 240 4 7 1 98228 38-4850 110 228 1200 196 0.5 2 2 95321 38-4855 140 183 1010 310 3 1 1 11 4326 38-4860 110 392 1150 453 4 3 2 99338 38-4865 70 261 2110 239 1 2 4 56522 38-4870 60 114 650 248 0.5 4 1 5 3221 38-4875 70 306 1100 299 1 3 1 57322 38-4880 10724001150.51112111 38-4885 30 270 1030 378 0.5 5 426 331 38-4890 2011027023221123124 38-4895 20 227 630 246 0.5 4 2 2 5 221 38-4900 30 247 900 310 0.5 4 4 2 6 221 38-4905 5 109 2230 154 0.5 24036 11

Page 11 of 12 Table 3: Latchford Gold Project MMI Sample Locations and Values for Select Elements

Sample No. As ppb Co ppb Cu ppb Ni ppb Bi ppb Ag RR Au RR As RR Co RR Cu RR Ni RR Bi RR 38-4910 50 229 1160 149 0.5 0 4 4 5 311 38-4915 30 314 1020 280 0.5 2427321 38-4920 60 528 1400 341 0.5 3 6 513 431 38-4925 80 202 1020 278 0.5 2 2 65321 38-4930 5615101520.52401111 38-4935 20 112 1110 191 1 6623312 38-4940 2017682018223424214 38-4945 51496901400.53404211 38-4950 30 77 1340 128 14422312 38-4955 120 166 1510 193 2 4 4 9 4414 38-4960 30 312 1550 99 10427 412 38-4965 30 79 920 174 3 6 422216 38-4970 5 86 2400 125 0.5 4 12 026 11 38-4975 40 117 850 273 2 5 133224 38-4980 303331013821121114 38-4985 20 122 330 271 0.5 5 123121 38-4990 30422301750.54121111 38-4995 20563402710.51221121 38-5000 40616780306422315 228 38-5005 3033454043621128 134 38-5010 505987027024441224 38-5015 40683903310.52232131 38-5020 40 242 530 201 0.5 2 2 3 6 121 38-5025 50 22 470 119 0.5 7 141111 38-5030 3018270910.52120111 38-5035 100 32 460 163 0.5 4 2 8 1111 38-5040 100 195 1310 258 3 6685326 38-5045 70 101 480 257 0.5 6 2 5 2121 38-5050 100 69 480 341 1 1 1 8 2132 38-5055 90 100 1410 221 3 1 4 7 2426 38-5060 80 60 480 164 4 1 1 6 1118

Page 12 of 12

APPENDIX II

Rock Sample Locations and Descriptions

Table 4: Latchford Gold Project Rock Sample Locations, Descriptions, and Assays

Sample East NAD27 North NAD27 Magnetic properties Description Certificate No 5184 593660 5234794 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate malachite stain; outcrop; strike 360 deg dip 90 deg 10-2391 Rusty fracture in layered sediments; silicified vein of pinkish quartz, pyrite and specular hematite 5 to 6 cm wide; 5185 593634 5234680 Low/Med speck of malachite stain; outcrop; strike 10 deg dip 84 deg E to 90 deg 10-2391 5186 593649 5234655 Low/Med Rusty fracture in conglomerate specular hematite; strike 350 deg dip 90 deg; outcrop 10-2391 5187 593624 5234703 Low/Med Rusty fracture in conglomerate specular hematite; outcrop; strike 320 deg dip 64 deg to SW 10-2391 5188 593634 5234683 Low/Med Rusty fracture in conglomerate specular hematite; outcrop; strike 12 deg dip 54 deg to WNW 10-2391 5189 593712 5234822 Low to None Rusty fracture in conglomerate specular hematite; outcrop; strike 310 deg dip 84 deg to SW 10-2391 5190 593787 5234878 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; outcrop; strike 284 deg dip 78 deg to SW 10-2391 5191 593739 5235056 None Fracture in conglomerate tiny quartz veinlet; outcrop; strike 250 deg dip 60 deg to S 10-2391 5192 593613 5234804 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; 1% chalcopyrite; outcrop; strike 10 deg dip 90 deg 10-2391 5193 593628 5234839 Very Low Rusty fracture in conglomerate; outcrop; strike 40 deg dip 76 deg to ESE 10-2391 5194 593628 5234838 Very Low Rusty fracture in conglomerate pyrite; outcrop; strike 360 deg dip 88 deg to W 10-2391 5195 593625 5234867 Low/Med Rusty fracture in conglomerate pyrite; specular hemetite; outcrop; strike 7 deg dip 89 deg to W 10-2391 5196 593412 5234801 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; specular hematite; outcrop; strike 17 deg dip 85 deg to E 10-2391

5197 593400 5234820 Low Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; specular hematite; chalcopyrite; outcrop; strike 17 deg dip 85 deg to E 10-2391 5198 593549 5234832 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; outcrop; pyrite; strike 290 deg dip 74 deg to SSW 10-2391 5199 593233 5234833 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; outcrop; strike 240 deg dip 78 deg to S 10-2391 5200 593238 5234840 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; outcrop; strike 10 deg dip 90 deg 10-2391 5501 593231 5234846 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; outcrop; strike 240 deg dip 80 deg to S 10-2391 5502 593227 5234843 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; outcrop; strike 226 deg; dip 90 deg 10-2391 5503 593228 5234840 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; chalcopyrtie; outcrop; strike 240 deg dip 80 deg to SE 10-2391 5504 593228 5234843 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; outcrop; strike 240 deg dip 76 deg to SE 10-2391 5505 593215 5234865 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; outcrop; strike 30 deg dip 84 deg to ESE 10-2391 5506 593207 5234875 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; outcrop; strike 240 deg dip 80 deg to SE 10-2391 5507 593241 5234855 None Rusty fracture in conglomerate; pyrite; outcrop; strike 260 deg dip 68 deg to S 10-2391 5508 592470 5235608 None Meta intrusive? and quartz; pyrite; top of old pit; foot wall side; outcrop 10-2391 20 cm quartz carbonate vein in shear zone of mafic volcanic? Shear is 2 meters wide in old pit; outcrop; strike 280 5509 592462 5235608 None deg dip 58 deg? to N 10-2391 5510 592469 5235597 None Meta volcanics; pyrite; hanging wall side of old pit; outcrop; strike 290 deg dip 58 deg to N 10-2391 5511 592571 5235566 Med Quartz veinlet in felsic intrusive pyrite; outcrop; strike 4 deg dip 70 deg to W 10-2391 5512 592420 5235559 Med Felsic intrusive pyrite; outcrop?/subcrop 10-2391 Pink and smokey quartz carbonate; chalcopyrite and pyrite in mafic volcanic; outcrop; strike 350 deg dip 60 deg to 5513 592620 5235327 Med/High W 10-2391 5514 592493 5235688 None 20 cm quartz or silicified area 1 meter N of shear 2% pyrite; outcrop; strike 270 deg dip 78 deg to N 10-2391 5515 592455 5235727 Med Mafic meta volcanics; pyrite; outcrop 10-2391 5516 592423 5235773 Low/Med 10 cm quartz vein; speck chalcopyrite; outcrop in meta intrusive? 10-2391 5517 592408 5235813 Low/Med Porphyry; pyrite; outcrop 10-2391 5518 592317 5235893 Low/Med Quartz in felsic intrusive? Some mafic parts; outcrop/subcrop?; chalcopyrite 10-2391 5519 592418 5235722 Low/Med Mafic volcanic; seam of pyrite; outcrop 10-2391

Page 1 of 3 Table 4: Latchford Gold Project Rock Sample Locations, Descriptions, and Assays

Au chk Au gpt Auchk Au gpt FA-gpt_FA- FA- gpt_FA- Sample AAS AAS GRAV GRAV Ag_ppm Al_pct As_ppm Ba_ppm Be_ppm Bi_ppm Ca_pct Cd_ppm Co_ppm Cr_ppm Cu_ppm Fe_pct Hg_ppm K_pct La_ppm 5184 0.03 - - - <0.2 1.84 5 10 <0.5 <5 0.13 4 54 109 1373 4.67 <1 0.01 <10

5185 0.04 - - - <0.2 0.48 6 <10 1.4 <5 0.09 4 153 81 97 4.45 <1 0.01 15 5186 0.13 - - - <0.2 1.17 5 <10 0.6 <5 0.2 4 77 96 146 5.08 <1 0.01 <10 5187 - - 1.06 - <0.2 1.99 <5 11 2.7 <5 0.39 5 61 96 277 5.65 <1 0.01 28 5188 - - 1.58 1.58 <0.2 1.19 9 12 1.4 <5 0.09 5 43 81 143 6.51 <1 0.02 11 5189 - - 1.92 - 0.5 1.24 6 15 <0.5 <5 0.06 4 91 76 18 4.89 <1 0.02 <10 5190 0.04 - - - <0.2 1.5 9 20 1.7 <5 0.21 6 101 180 31 6.85 <1 0.03 21 5191 0.01 - - - <0.2 1.84 <5 16 0.7 <5 0.15 4 31 140 41 4.96 <1 0.03 25 5192 0.07 - - - 0.3 1.63 6 <10 0.5 <5 0.07 4 163 94 8871 4.9 <1 0.02 18 5193 2.23 1.7 - - <0.2 1.51 14 12 0.7 <5 0.08 3 265 98 78 4.39 <1 0.01 39 5194 - - 3.43 - <0.2 1.78 11 12 0.6 <5 0.1 4 501 96 29 5.43 <1 0.01 13 5195 - - 10.22 9.32 1 1.75 5 11 <0.5 <5 0.11 4 167 107 15 5.1 <1 0.02 25 5196 0.09 - - - <0.2 1.03 23 <10 <0.5 <5 0.08 3 232 59 91 4.18 <1 0.01 <10

5197 0.24 - - - <0.2 1.91 54 18 0.8 <5 0.08 6 595 107 396 7.46 <1 0.01 <10 5198 0.5 0.45 - - <0.2 1.61 26 10 0.5 <5 0.12 5 562 84 176 5.96 <1 0.01 112 5199 0.68 - - - 0.2 1.75 18 <10 <0.5 <5 0.16 4 344 95 791 5.29 <1 0.02 10 5200 0.44 - - - <0.2 1.88 22 <10 <0.5 <5 0.12 4 424 95 453 5.26 <1 0.02 <10 5501 - - 1.82 - 0.5 1.23 36 <10 <0.5 <5 0.15 5 779 81 179 5.67 <1 0.01 <10 5502 - - 1.54 - <0.2 1.82 31 <10 <0.5 <5 0.15 5 390 110 406 5.59 <1 0.02 <10 5503 1.78 1.35 - - 0.7 2.01 55 <10 0.5 <5 0.69 8 1537 84 6353 9 <1 0.01 <10 5504 - - 7.13 6.73 1.9 1.29 28 <10 <0.5 <5 0.4 4 713 97 174 4.88 <1 0.03 11 5505 0.25 - - - <0.2 1.89 14 <10 0.5 <5 0.15 5 441 102 180 5.28 <1 0.02 <10 5506 - - 1.5 - <0.2 1.69 18 <10 8.3 <5 0.15 4 364 105 71 4.76 <1 0.05 55 5507 - - 12.62 11.26 0.8 1.72 19 <10 0.7 <5 0.29 5 695 111 260 5.85 <1 0.02 37 5508 0.02 - - - <0.2 1.21 17 29 0.6 <5 0.26 3 56 15 19 3.13 <1 0.05 10

5509 < 0.01 - - - <0.2 0.75 <5 17 <0.5 <5 1.58 1 8 254 9 1.61 <1 0.01 <10 5510 0.02 - - - 0.8 2.25 29 40 0.9 5 0.44 4 82 234 59 4.96 <1 0.08 20 5511 0.01 - - - <0.2 1 8 35 1.5 <5 1.06 3 22 1 51 3.92 <1 0.09 16 5512 < 0.01 - - - <0.2 1.24 7 26 1.7 <5 1.34 4 20 <1 24 4.49 <1 0.12 15

5513 0.03 0.01 - - 13.1 1.24 10 34 2.9 32 2.65 6 34 111 179 6.32 1 0.04 25 5514 - - 3.56 4.19 1.7 0.68 29 54 0.5 23 0.55 6 41 4 79 7.33 <1 0.26 14 5515 < 0.01 - - - <0.2 1.59 10 30 2 <5 4.46 6 31 16 48 6.13 2 0.1 23 5516 < 0.01 - - - 0.2 0.31 <5 80 <0.5 <5 2.13 1 7 3 72 1.37 <1 0.02 11 5517 < 0.01 < 0.01 - - <0.2 1.28 11 19 1.6 <5 0.82 3 23 19 41 4.12 <1 0.07 10 5518 0.04 - - - <0.2 0.26 6 15 <0.5 <5 0.08 2 4 1 1150 2.23 <1 0.02 11 5519 < 0.01 - - - 0.3 1.27 10 53 0.7 5 0.48 8 57 <1 163 8.76 <1 0.27 13

Page 2 of 3 Table 4: Latchford Gold Project Rock Sample Locations, Descriptions, and Assays

Sample Mg_pct Mn_ppm Mo_ppm Na_pct Ni_ppm P_pct Pb_ppm S_pct Sb_ppm Sc_ppm Sr_ppm Th _ppm Ti_pct Tl_ppm U_ppm V_ppm W_ppm Zn_ppm Zr_ppm 5184 1.78 403 <2 0.05 60 0.071 12 0.08 <5 10 4 6 0.01 <10 <10 79 <10 21 22

5185 0.37 277 <2 0.08 33 0.018 5 0.59 <5 5 3 5 0.04 <10 <10 45 <10 8 24 5186 1.11 345 <2 0.06 41 0.024 10 0.34 <5 7 4 5 0.06 <10 <10 70 <10 23 17 5187 1.89 866 <2 0.05 56 0.055 11 0.15 <5 13 9 6 0.01 <10 <10 96 <10 24 24 5188 1 295 <2 0.05 33 0.036 9 0.1 <5 8 4 6 0.02 <10 <10 80 <10 17 17 5189 0.94 322 <2 0.05 45 0.038 10 0.15 <5 6 4 8 0.02 <10 <10 70 <10 25 20 5190 0.95 382 <2 0.04 52 0.095 17 0.72 <5 10 5 8 0.21 11 <10 103 <10 28 23 5191 1.48 408 <2 0.03 48 0.062 10 0.08 <5 6 9 10 0.06 <10 <10 82 <10 40 23 5192 1.39 217 5 0.05 60 0.05 22 1.27 <5 8 4 9 0.01 <10 <10 68 <10 15 25 5193 1.22 207 <2 0.05 69 0.056 12 0.61 <5 7 5 12 0.02 11 <10 60 <10 16 30 5194 1.61 261 <2 0.05 103 0.052 10 1.49 <5 8 4 10 0.01 <10 <10 79 <10 19 28 5195 1.48 260 <2 0.04 68 0.073 10 0.4 <5 8 4 9 0.01 <10 <10 92 <10 20 25 5196 0.86 196 <2 0.06 61 0.042 7 0.48 <5 7 5 5 0.01 <10 <10 49 <10 11 14

5197 1.6 281 <2 0.04 135 0.052 12 0.54 <5 13 3 5 0.01 <10 <10 89 <10 20 21 5198 1.44 263 2 0.04 123 0.062 16 1.47 <5 8 8 11 0.02 35 <10 74 <10 18 22 5199 1.57 269 <2 0.05 80 0.091 20 0.92 <5 8 5 8 0.01 <10 <10 80 <10 22 26 5200 1.69 282 <2 0.05 86 0.071 11 1.15 <5 8 5 7 <0.01 <10 <10 83 <10 26 29 5501 1.13 183 2 0.08 106 0.085 10 2.21 <5 7 5 7 <0.01 <10 <10 66 <10 15 26 5502 1.72 271 <2 0.06 84 0.099 14 1.09 <5 12 5 8 <0.01 <10 <10 96 <10 22 29 5503 1.89 403 2 0.06 200 0.101 21 4.56 <5 12 11 7 0.01 <10 <10 103 <10 27 27 5504 1.06 196 <2 0.06 88 0.098 7 1.97 <5 7 6 8 <0.01 <10 <10 63 <10 15 32 5505 1.73 288 <2 0.06 81 0.07 11 1.13 <5 10 5 9 <0.01 <10 <10 86 <10 24 35 5506 1.34 233 <2 0.06 65 0.078 12 0.92 <5 8 6 7 <0.01 16 <10 69 <10 20 27 5507 1.39 267 <2 0.06 99 0.076 10 1.99 <5 10 7 8 <0.01 <10 <10 83 <10 20 26 5508 1.34 463 7 0.04 71 0.058 12 0.72 <5 3 7 <5 0.04 <10 <10 49 <10 53 12

5509 0.97 554 <2 0.02 70 0.033 11 0.05 <5 1 23 <5 0.01 <10 <10 23 <10 34 3 5510 2.71 659 8 0.03 153 0.158 62 1 5 4 7 <5 0.08 <10 <10 82 <10 94 24 5511 0.73 359 2 0.07 <1 0.285 29 0.39 <5 3 30 <5 0.21 <10 <10 50 <10 94 4 5512 0.91 317 9 0.06 <1 0.35 17 0.7 <5 3 32 <5 0.24 <10 <10 59 12 56 4

5513 1.42 808 <2 0.06 41 0.038 667 0.36 6 12 24 <5 0.39 14 <10 182 <10 60 15 5514 0.3 201 2 0.02 8 0.066 16 5.21 <5 1 8 <5 0.05 <10 <10 22 <10 17 9 5515 0.9 1025 2 0.06 17 0.209 11 0.92 <5 11 38 <5 0.26 12 <10 68 <10 100 18 5516 0.26 378 <2 0.04 5 0.017 18 0.22 <5 3 30 <5 0.03 <10 <10 17 <10 26 15 5517 1.06 640 2 0.06 33 0.073 29 0.1 <5 3 36 <5 0.22 <10 <10 95 <10 66 19 5518 0.16 122 <2 0.07 3 0.014 7 0.16 <5 3 7 <5 0.05 <10 <10 19 <10 10 10 5519 0.35 410 4 0.05 <1 0.108 57 4.32 <5 4 15 <5 0.09 <10 <10 18 <10 31 12

Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX III

Assay Certificates

Certificate of Analysis Work Order: T0110578

To: Karen Rees Date: Jun 29, 2010 General Manager Temex Resources Corp. Suite 1660 141 Adelaide Str. W TORONTO ON M5H 3L5

P.O. No. Project:Latchford Project No. No. Of Samples 95 Date Submitted Jun 22, 2010 Report Comprises Pages 1 to 4 (Inclusive of Cover Sheet) Distribution of unused material: Discard after 90 days:

Certified By f.i/~;b/-- ~ Gavin McGill Operations Manager

SGS Minerals Services (Toronto) is accredited by Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and confonns to the requirements of ISOIIEC 17025 for specific tests as indicated on the scope of accreditation to be found at http:llwww.scc.ca/enlprogramsllabhnineral.shtml

Report Footer: L.N.R. = Listed not received I.S. = In sufficient Sample n.a. =Not applicable =No result

'INF = Composition ofthis sample makes detection impossible by this method M after a result denotes ppb to ppm conversion, %denotes ppm to% conversion Methods marked with an asterisk (e.g. 'NMOS\/) were subcontracted Methods marked with the @symbol (e.g. @AAS21E) denote accredited tests

Thi s document IS 1ssued by th e Company under its General Conditions of Serv1ce accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions. htm Attention IS drawn to the limitation of liability, indemn ification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

WARNING: Th e sample(s) to which the fin dings recorded herein (the "Find rn gs") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Cli ent or by a third party acting at the Client's direction . The Fin dings constitute no warranty of th e sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to th e sample(s) The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from wh ich the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commerci al or contractual settlement pu rposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of thi s document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the full est extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com

Membe r of the SGS Group (Societe Ghll! ra le de Surve illance) Page 2 of 4 Fin a' T0110578 Order: P oje t:L~t t ford Element --;:J M Co Method MMI-M;I MMI-M5I MMI-M5 Det.Lim. 10 5 ppb~ ppb Units ppb~ ....::.;J F 665 ___J 72 34-4670 ~ 32 34-4680 ~ ~ 17 34-1 ----3 ~ 46 34-2 ~ ~ 38 34.3 ~ ~ 43 34-4 ~ ~ 63 34-5 ~ ~ 54 34-6 ----i1 ~ 14 34-7 ~ ~ 21 §4-8 ~ ~ 44 'B4-9 ~ ~ 21 j:..:....; ~ ~10 ~ 100 34-11 ~ ~ 64 'M-1 2 ~ ~ 62 ~ ~13 ~ 56 34-14 -----3 ~ 26 34-15 ~ ~ 94 34-16 ~ ~ 62 34-17 ~ ~ 38 M-18 ~50 1841 34-19 200, 316 34-4810 ~ -To' 75 34-4815 ~ -To' 106 34-4820 ~ --Tal 59 ----i1 -fr} 34-4825 ~ 72 E_4830 -To' 76 34-4835 ~ --fa' 65 M-4840 ~ <0.1 --fa' 30 M-4845 ~ <0.1 -To' 52 ~ ~4850 ~ <0.1 -To' 70 34-4855 <0.1 ---fa' 115 M-4860 ---J 0.1 -To' m E_4865 --i <0.1 -To' 74 ~4870 --Tst <0.1 -Tot 1641 34-4875 -i <0.1 --To' 34-4880 5 1 34-4885 9 ~ 34-4890 ~ 111 34-4895 ~ <0.1 98 34-4900 ---ic} <0.1 118 34-4905 ~ <0.1 52 1 b 910 -Tal <0.1 104 1 .....:..:1 ~

Thi s document IS 1ssued by th e Company under its General Conditions of Serv1ce accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions.htm. Attention IS drawn to the limitation of liability, indemn ification and jurisdiction issues defin ed therein.

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the fin dings recorded herein (the "Find rn gs") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by th e Cli ent or by a th ird party acting at the Client's direction . The Fin dings constitute no warranty of th e sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to th e sample(s) The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findin gs report on th e samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement pu rposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawfu l and offenders may be prosecuted to the full est extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc . Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com

Membe r of the SGS Group (Societe Ghll!ra le de Surveillance) Page 3 of 4 Fin a' T0110578 Order: P oje t:L~t t ford Element --;:J hi M Co MMI-M5 MMI-M5 Method MMI-M;I MMI-M5I Det.Lim. 0.1 10 5 Units ppb~ ppb ppb' ppb F 915 <0.1 -Tal 66 ~ ~ 34-4920 ~ <0.1 ~ 28 34-4925 ~ 0.2 111 34-4930 0.2 ~ 67 34-4935 ~ <0.1 ~ 44 34-4940 ~ <0.1 ~ 94 34-4945 ~ ~ ~ ~ 21 34-4950 3 ~ 52 34-4955 -Tst 19 34-4960 ---i ~ 33 ~ §4-4965 ~ ~ 119 E_4970 ~ 100 ~4975 ~ 121 34-4980 ~ ~ 38 ~ ~ M:4985 ~ <0.1 ~ 51 ~4990 <0.1 17 34-4995 ~ <0.1 ~ 51 34-5000 ~ <0.1 ~ 55 34-5025 ~ ~ 112 34-5050 ~ ~ 85 M-5075 ~ ~ 35 34-5100 ~ ~ 82 34-5325 ~9 ~ 94 34-5350 ~ 87 ~.....:..:1 34-5375 ~ 62 34-5400 ~ ~ 1'341 ~ ~ ....:..:...J ~0-4500 __gj 41 36-4505 <0.1 ~ 71 ~510 ~ <0.1 ~ 43 ~515 ~ <0.1 ~ 70 C,6-4520 ~9 <0.1 ~ 61 36-4525 ~ <0.1 ~ 83 ~530 10' <0.1 ~ ~ rn ~535 --Tal 129 ~ e_6-4540 --i ~ 87 36-4545 --11 <0.1 10 36-4550 8 <0.1 36-4555 <0.1 36-4560 ~ <0.1 75 36-4565 ~ <0.1 82 36-4570 1il 49 36-4575 --i 112

~580 ---1___,.:I 69

Thi s document IS 1ssued by th e Company under its General Conditions of Serv1ce accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions.htm. Attention IS drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defin ed therein.

WARNING: Th e sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Find rn gs") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by th e Cli ent or by a th ird party acting at the Client's direction. The Fin dings constitute no warranty of th e sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to th e sample(s) The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement pu rposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of thi s document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the full est extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com

Membe r of the SGS Group (Societe Ghll!rale de Surve illance) Page 4 of 4 Fin a' - Element Co !I Method M MMI-M5 MMI-M~I Det.Lim. 5 Units ppb pp~l E sas 166 36-4590 118 2 36-4595 179 36-4600 108 36-4610 162 36-4615 1541 1 36-4620 149 ~2 36-4625 72 ~ 36-4630 148 ----j! ~p34.3 41 ~p34-14 29 ~p34-4860 117 'Rep 34-491 0 101 ~p34-4970 92 ~p34-5400 ill ~p36-4570 47 'Rep 36-461 5 141 '*Sid MMISRM18 60 '*Sid MMISRM16 49 t.:'Std MMISR M18 58 ' Bik BLANK <5 ~ BLANK <5 ~BLANK <5

Thi s document IS 1ssued by th e Company under its General Conditions of Serv1ce accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions.htm. Attention IS drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defin ed therein.

WARNING: Th e sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findrn gs") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by th e Cli ent or by a th ird party acting at the Client's direction. The Findings constitute no warranty of th e sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to th e sample(s) The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement pu rposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of thi s document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the full est extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com

Member of the SGS Group (Societe Ghll!rale de Surveillance) Certificate of Analysis Work Order: T0110606

To: Karen Rees Date: Jul07, 2010 General Manager Temex Resources Corp. Suite 1660 141 Adelaide Str. W TORONTO ON M5H 3L5

P.O. No. Project:Latchford Project No. No. Of Samples 101 Date Submitted Jun 22, 2010 Report Comprises Pages 1 to 4 (Inclusive of Cover Sheet) Distribution of unused material: Discard after 90 days:

Certified By f.i/~;b/-- ~ Gavin McGill Operations Manager

SGS Minerals Services (Toronto) is accredited by Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and confonns to the requirements of ISOIIEC 17025 for specific tests as indicated on the scope of accreditation to be found at http:llwww.scc.ca/enlprogramsllabhnineral.shtml

Report Footer: L.N.R. = Listed not received I.S. = In sufficient Sample n.a. =Not applicable =No result

'INF = Composition ofthis sample makes detection impossible by this method M after a result denotes ppb to ppm conversion, %denotes ppm to% conversion Methods marked with an asterisk (e.g. 'NMOS\/) were subcontracted Methods marked with the @symbol (e.g. @AAS21E) denote accredited tests

Thi s document IS 1ssued by th e Company under its General Conditions of Serv1ce accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions. htm Attention IS drawn to the limitation of liability, indemn ification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

WARNING: Th e sample(s) to which the fin dings recorded herein (the "Find rn gs") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Cli ent or by a third party acting at the Client's direction . The Fin dings constitute no warranty of th e sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to th e sample(s) The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from wh ich the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commerci al or contractual settlement pu rposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of thi s document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the full est extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com

Membe r of the SGS Group (Societe Ghll! ra le de Surve illance) Page 2 of 4 Fin a' T0110606 Order: P oje t:L~t t ford Element --;:J M Co MMI-M5 !I Method MMI-M;I MMI-M5I MMI-M~I Det.Lim. 10 5 ppb' Units ppb~ ppbl E 635 -Tal 134 1 ~ m 36-4640 8 -To' 143 36-4645 --Tsl 1io' 207 ~ 36-4650 --i --Tal 89 ~ ~ 36-4655 -il 68 ~ 36-4660 ~ 263 ~ ~ 36-4665 --Tal 375 ~ ~ 36-4670 ~ 90 ~ 36-4675 ~ 113 1 3'6-4680 ~ 367 3 M-4685 --11 ~ 199 ~ ---1 67 ~690 ~ C,.6-47oo ---1 69 1 ~ 36-4705 ~ ~ 54 ~2 M-4710 ~ 129 E6-4715 ~ 181 ~ ~ ~ 36-4720 ~ ~ 75 36-4725 ~ ~ 138 1 36-4730 ~ 73 1 36-4735 ----3 212 ~2 G6-4740 ~ ~ 68 36-4745 ~ ~ 192 ~ 36-4950 ~ 2541 36-4955 ~ ~ 196 36-4960 ~ ~ ~ ~ 669 36-4965 ~ 0.2 ~ 182 ~970 2 <0.1 247 36-4975 <0.1 ~ 123 M-4980 <0.1 ~ 'i46 ~ M-4985 1 <0.1 ~ 195 C,6-4990 1 ~ 129 38-4715 ~ 175 oo:4720 ~ ~ 2i"41 ~ .:..:...J ~725 ~ ~ 139 E_8-4730 -Tot ~ 71 38-4735 ~ 40 38-4740 38-4745 38-4750 55 38-4755 59 38-4765 126 38-4770 242 ~775 100

Thi s document IS 1ssued by th e Company under its General Conditions of Serv1ce accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions.htm. Attention IS drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defin ed therein.

WARNING: Th e sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findrn gs") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by th e Cli ent or by a th ird party acting at the Client's direction. The Fin dings constitute no warranty of th e sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to th e sample(s) The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commerci al or contractual settlement pu rposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of thi s document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the full est extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com

Member of the SGS Group (Societe Ghll!ra le de Surve illance) Page 3 of 4 Fin a' T0110606 Order: P oje t:L~t t ford Element --;:J M Co MMI-M5 Method MMI-M;I MMI-M5I Det.Lim. 10 5 ppb' ppb Units ppb~ ....::.;J 44 E 780 ~ ~ 38-4785 ~ ~ 212 38-4790 ~ ~ 88 38-4795 ~ ~ 115 38-4800 6 ~ 65 38-4805 ~ 177 ~ 38-4810 ---i 198 ~ 38-4815 ~ 186 38-4820 ~ 177 38-4825 ~ 67 1 00-4830 ~ 50 197 ~2 ----il 1fo+ 237 41 ~835 ~ C.,8-4840 2 -To' 353 38-4845 1i ~ 321 ~ 'BS-4850 ---i ~ m ~8-4855 ---1 140, 183 ~ 38-4860 ---? ~ 392 ~ 38-4865 ---i -To' 261 38-4870 -Tal --g m ____::;; 38-4875 --To' 306 G8-4880 ~ -To' 72 38-4885 1il ---g 270 38-4890 --i --fa' 110 38-4895 -To' 227 38-4900 ~ --To' 247 ~ ----3 38-4905 ~ 109 ~910 229 38-4915 ~ 3i4l ~ 'BS-4920 ~ 528 ~925 ~ ~ "202 ~ C,8-4930 6 ~ 61 38-4935 ~ 112 --11...... :..:1 ~940 ~ m ---.21 ~ ~945 ~ 149 e_8-4950 ~ 30 77 38-4955 1d 1fol 38-4960 38-4965 38-4970 86 38-4975 <0.1 117 38-4980 <0.1 33 38-4985 <0.1 122 ~990 <0.1 42

Thi s document IS 1ssued by th e Company under its General Conditions of Serv1ce accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions.htm . Attention IS drawn to the limitation of liability, indemn ification and jurisdiction issues defin ed therein.

WARNING: Th e sample(s) to which the fin dings recorded herein (the "" Findrn gs") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by th e Cli ent or by a th ird party acting at the Client"s direction . The Fin dings constitute no warranty of th e sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to th e sample(s) The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from which the sampl e(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findin gs report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commerci al or contractual settlement pu rposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of thi s document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the full est extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com

Membe r of the SGS Group (Societe Ghll! ra le de Surve illance) Fin a' Page 4 of 4 Element - Co Method M MMI-M5 Det.Lim. 5 Units ppb E 995 56 38-5000 616 38-5005 3341 38-5010 59 38-5015 68 38-5020 242 38-5025 22 38-5030 18 38-5035 32 38-'5040 195 00-5045 101 ~050 69 C.,8-5055 100 38-5060 60 'BS-4760 91 ~p36-4685 198 'Rep 36-4715 170 '*R;p 36-4980 157 '*R;p 38-4820 229 t.'Rep 38-4870 "'1341 'Rep 38-4940 189 *Rep 38-4980 42 '*R;p 38-5020 241 t.sid MMISRM 18 59 *Std MMISRM 16 65 r.&cj MM ISRM 18 76 r.sik' BLANK <5 ~ BLANK <5 ~BLANK <5

This document IS 1ssued by th e Company under its General Conditions of Serv1ce accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions.htm. Attention IS drawn to the limitation of liability, indemn ification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the fin dings recorded herein (the "Findrn gs") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Cli ent or by a third party acting at the Client's direction. The Findings constitute no warranty of th e sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to th e sample(s) The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from wh ich the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findings report on th e samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement pu rposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of thi s document is unlawfu l and offenders may be prosecuted to the full est extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc . Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com

Membe r of the SGS Group (Societe Ghll!ra le de Surveillance) Swastika Laboratories Ltd Ls!nb!:~he1l I 9!:t Assaying -Consulting - Representation Page I of2 Assay Certificate Certificate Number: 10-2391 Company: Temex Resources Corp. Ptoject: LATCHFORD Report Date: 30-Jul-10 Attn: Karen Rees

We hereby cerl!fy the following Assay of36 rock samples submitted 22-Jun-10 by Henry Hutteri

J>.u Au Chk AI> Au Chk Sample ~·A-AAS ~A-AAS fi\-GRAV fA- GRI\V Numher g/t~t g/~1t g/~!t <;/Mt

5184 0.03 5185 0.04 5186 0 . 13 5187 1.06 5188 1.58 1.58 5189 l. 92 5190 0.04 5191 0.01 5192 0 . 07 5193 2 . 23 1. 70 5194 3 . 43 5195 10 . 22 9 . 32 5196 0. 09 5197 () . 24 5198 0 . 50 o. 45 5199 0 . 68 5200 0 . 4 4 K550l 1.82 K5502 1. 54 K5503 l. 78 1. 35 Blank Value < 0 .01 Oxf65 0 . 78 KS504 7 . 13 6 . 73 1<5505 0 . 25 K5506 l. 50

Certifiedby ~ ~ Denis Chartre

1 Cameron Ave., P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK 1TO Telephone (705) &12-3244 Fax (705) &12·3300 Swastika Laboratories Ltd Assaying- Consulting - Representation Page 2 of2 Assav Certificate Certificate Number: 10-2391

Company: Temex Resources Corp. Project LATCHFORD Report Date: 30-Jul-10 Attn: Karen Rees

We hereby certify the following Assay of 36 rock samples submitted 22-Jun-10 by Henry Hutteri

Au Au Chk Au Au Chk Sample fA-AAS FA-AAS FA-GAAV FA-GAAV Number g/~l~ g/Ht g/Mt <;/~!t

KSS07 12.62 11.26 K5508 0 . 02 K5509 < 0 . 01 KSS10 0 . 02 1<5511 0 . 01 K5512 < 0 . 01 K5513 0 . 03 0 . 01 KSS14 3.56 4 . ]9 K551S < 0 .01 1<5516 < 0 . 01 K5517 < 0 .01 < 0.01 K551B 0 . 04 1<5519 < 0 . 01

Certifiedhy t!j~ ~ Denis Chartre

1 Cameron Ave., P.O. Bo~ 10, Swastika, Ontario POK no Telephone (705) 642-3244 fax (705) 642-3300 Assayers Canada 8282 Sherbrooke St, Vancouver, B.C., VSX 4R6 Report No OW2391PJ Tel: (604) 327-3436 Fax: (604) 327-3423 Date Aug..OS-10 Temex Resources Corp. Sample l)>pe PULP Project Latchford Multi-Element ICP·AES Analysis Atteation: Aqua Regia Digestion

Sampfo Ag AI As Sa Be Bi ca Cd Co Cr Cu f'e Hg I< la Mg Mn Mo Na Ni p P1> S Sb So Sr Til TiTIUVWZnZr Numbe< ppm 't. ppm ppm l)pm llP"' % ppm llP"' p~m llP"' %ppm %ppm % ppm ppm % ppm %ppm 'h ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm

4 ,. SS84 <0.~ 1.84 5 10 <0.$ <' o.u t09 'lJ7) "'·" .4$ 6 <10 }.,4

10 t.49 ,. S19' Z S199 0.2 1.7$ J8 <10 <0.~

KSSOO <0.2 0.7$ <$ 17

A . 5 vm sompf• is digeo!ed V

P$Qe I ot2. Signed: ______.J.qfoL-- -- Assayers Canada 8282 Slterbrooke St., V•ncouver. B.C., VSX 4R6 Report No OW2391PJ Tel: (604) 327-3436 Fax: {604) 327-3423 Date Aug-OS-10 Temcx Resources Corp. Sample !ype PUL£' Projec1 Latchford Multi-Element ICP-AES Analysis AnMtion: Aqua Regia Digestion

Sample Ag AIAoS3BeBi Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fo Hg Mg Mq Mo Na Ni S Sb Se Sr Tll Till U VW'ZIIZt Number ppm % PI>"' P!>m PI>"' ppm ·~ ppm ~m ppm 13Pm %ppm % ppm PI>"' % pj)m % C)~m ~pm ppm ppm % ppm PI>"' ppm ppm Pl>m ppm l{5S14 1.1 0.68 29 S

Oup!h:::ttu.: <.$ 98 1)77 4.33 <1 0.01 <10 so 0,0, I 6 0.01 4 .2$3 9'• 14 •UtJ <1 0.02 )1 1.2) 213 <2 0.06 69 O.OS4 lL O.S1 7 s u o.o2 10 <10 S9 <10 14 JO to:'SSOJ l.(l ~.QJ $4

KSStS c0,2. 1:S6 ~ ll 2.0

Sf:a.ndltfi!SI 81.111\\:. <0.2 <0.01 <~ <10

A .5 gm sampla ;, dlgestJ>d with S ml3:1 HCIIHNOO ~· ~S'C for 2 hoors and dilule

s;gned: ______-'cfl'-1------592,500 mE 593,000 mE 593,500 mE 5,236,000 mN 5,236,000

E E E

E E E

E E E

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

6 6 6

6 6 6

6 6 6

2 2 2

2 2 2

2 2 2

L L L

L L L

L L L

30039053003905 w55185518 L2400 E L2400 E L2400 E L2400 E L2400 E L2400 E L2400 E L2400 E L2400 E

w55175517

E E E

E E E E E E

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

3 3 3 55165516 3 3 3 w55165516 3 3 3

L L L

L L L L L L L2800 E L2800 E L2800 E L2800 E L2800 E L2800 E L2800 E L2800 E L2800 E

w55155515 w55195519

w55145514

5508 55095509 ww 55085508 w55105510

w55115511 w55125512

E E E

E E E

E E E

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

4 4 4

4 4 4

4 4 4

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

L L L

L L L

L L L

E E E

E E E

E E E

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

2 2 2

2 2 2

2 2 2

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

L L L

L L L

L L L 5,235,500 mN 5,235,500

34-5400

34-5375

34-5350 30074393007439

w55135513 34-5325

E E E

E E E

E E E

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

8 8 8

8 8 8

8 8 8

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

L L L

L L L

L L L L3600 E L3600 E L3600 E L3600 E L3600 E L3600 E L3600 E L3600 E L3600 E

JohnsonJohnson LakeLake

HH iii iigig hh ww aa yy

1 1 11 34-5100

34-5075

w51915191 38-5055 34-5050 38-5045 38-5035 34-5025 38-5025 38-5015 38-5005 34-4995 38-4995 36-4990 34-4985 38-4985 36-4980

5,235,000 mN 5,235,000 34-4975 38-4975 36-4970 34-4965 38-4965 36-4960 34-4955 38-4955 36-4950 34-4945 38-4945 34-4935 38-4935 34-4925 38-4925 34-4915 38-4915 34-4905 38-4905 34-4895 38-4895

34-4885 51905190 38-4885 w 30039023003902 55065506 w 34-4875 38-4875 30039023003902 55055505 w 34-4865 w51955195 38-4865 w 42435484243548 55015501 w55075507 34-4855 38-4855 55025502 www 34-4845 51945194 38-4845 55045504 www 52005200 5504 w w 34-4835 w 38-4835 w w51985198 55035503 w 51935193 51995199 34-4825 51895189 38-4825 w 51975197 w51895189 34-4815 38-4815 34-4810 34-1 51925192 38-4805 w w51925192 51845184 51965196 w 34-2 34-3 w 38-4795 34-4 38-4785 34-5 38-4775 34-6 38-4765 34-9 34-7 38-4755 34-8 34-10 38-4745 36-4740 34-11 34-12 38-4735 34-13 36-4730 34-14 38-4725 34-15 36-4720 38-4715 34-16 36-4710 34-17 36-4700 w51875187 34-18 36-4690 51885188 34-19 51885188 34-4680 36-4680 w 34-4670 36-4670 51855185 34-4665 36-4660 30117943011794 w51865186 36-4650 w 30118073011807 36-4640 36-4630 36-4620 36-4610

36-4595 36-4585 36-4575 36-4565

36-4555 Transmission Line 36-4545 or Pipeline 36-4535 36-4525 Railway 36-4515 BLL44550000N 36-4505 Secondary Road 5,234,500 mN 5,234,500 Road

Trail, winter road

Swamp, wetland

Lake

Topo contour, 50 m

Watercourse

w Rock Sample with number

MMI Sample Location with number

Temex Claim with number

Gridline

Rev:15/01/2011

Date:15/11/2010 Map 1: Brett and BH Property Author: K. Kettles 2010 Sample Plan

Office: Sudbury MMI and Rock Sample Locations

Dwg: Sample Map 1

Scale: 1:2500 Projection: UTM NAD 27 Zone 17 N Transmission Line or Pipeline Railway Secondary Road Road Trail, winter road Swamp, wetland Lake Topo contour, 50 m Watercourse FI - Felsic Intrusive FI - Felsic Intrusive FI - Felsic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive FV - Felsic Volcanics FV - Felsic Volcanics FV - Felsic Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics Major Fault Major Fault Major Fault FI - Felsic Intrusive FI - Felsic Intrusive FI - Felsic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive FV - Felsic Volcanics FV - Felsic Volcanics FV - Felsic Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics Major Fault Major Fault Major Fault FI - Felsic Intrusive FI - Felsic Intrusive FI - Felsic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive MI - Mafic Intrusive FV - Felsic Volcanics FV - Felsic Volcanics FV - Felsic Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics IV - Intermediate Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics MV - Mafic Volcanics Major Fault Major Fault Major Fault Gridline Temex Claim with number Contacts Outcrops, Structures Latchford Gold Project 2009 and 2010 Mapping Projection: NAD27 Zone 17 UTM Projection Scale: 1:3,000 Date:17/1/2011 Author: H. Hutteri Office: Sudbury Drawing: Map 2 QV - Quartz vein QV - Quartz vein QV - Quartz vein LAMP - Lamprophyre LAMP - Lamprophyre LAMP - Lamprophyre DIA - Diabase DIA - Diabase DIA - Diabase HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HGL - Huronian Conglomerate HGL - Huronian Conglomerate HGL - Huronian Conglomerate Contact, assumed Contact, assumed Contact, assumed QV - Quartz vein QV - Quartz vein QV - Quartz vein LAMP - Lamprophyre LAMP - Lamprophyre LAMP - Lamprophyre DIA - Diabase DIA - Diabase DIA - Diabase HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HGL - Huronian Conglomerate HGL - Huronian Conglomerate HGL - Huronian Conglomerate Contact, assumed Contact, assumed Contact, assumed QV - Quartz vein QV - Quartz vein QV - Quartz vein LAMP - Lamprophyre LAMP - Lamprophyre LAMP - Lamprophyre DIA - Diabase DIA - Diabase DIA - Diabase HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HSEDS - Huronian Sediments HGL - Huronian Conglomerate HGL - Huronian Conglomerate HGL - Huronian Conglomerate Contact, assumed Contact, assumed Contact, assumed

594,500 mE

4 L 4 0

E 4 0 4 L

E 0 0 4 4 L

E 0 4 0 L 4 E

0 0 0 4 L E 0

4 4 4 L E

0 0 E 0

4 0 4 0 L E 0

4 L 4

E 0 4 0 L 4 E

E 0 0 0 0 4 4 L

E 4 4 L 0 0 4 4 L

0 0 4 4 L E

0 0 0 4 L E 0

4 4 4 L E

0 0 4 L 4

E 0 0 4 0 4 L 0

E 4 4 L E contact contact contact Dike Dike Dike Fracture, Vein Fracture, Vein Fracture, Vein Vein Vein Vein shear shear shear Vein/Fracture Trend Vein/Fracture Trend Vein/Fracture Trend contact contact contact Dike Dike Dike Fracture, Vein Fracture, Vein Fracture, Vein Vein Vein Vein shear shear shear Vein/Fracture Trend Vein/Fracture Trend Vein/Fracture Trend contact contact contact Dike Dike Dike Fracture, Vein Fracture, Vein Fracture, Vein Vein Vein Vein shear shear shear Vein/Fracture Trend Vein/Fracture Trend Vein/Fracture Trend

lltt

uu # i aa B FF o ¡ rrdd ffoo hh 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 ttcc 3011794 3011794 3011794 aatt LL

L4200EL4200E

4 L E

E 0 0 0 0 0 0 L E 4

4 L 0 4 0 0 L E

0 0 0 L 4

E 0 0 4 0 L

E 0 0 0 E

0 0 0 L 4

E 0 0 0 0 0

E 4 0 L 4 L E

0 4 0 0 L E

0 0 4 0 L

E 0 0 0 4 L

E 0 0 0 4 L 0

E

0 E 0 0 4 L 0 0 E 4

L 0 0 0 L E

4 0 4 0 0 L E

0 0 0 L 4 594,000 mE DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA 4243548 4243548 4243548 4243548 4243548 4243548 4243548 4243548 4243548 Johnson Lake Johnson Lake Johnson Lake Johnson Lake Johnson Lake Johnson Lake Johnson Lake Johnson Lake Johnson Lake DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA

B

E E E E E E

E 0 0 3 L 8 0 0 3 L 8 0 0 3 L 8 E E 3 8 L 3 8 0 E L 3 8 0 0 E L 0 0 E 0

0 0 3 L 8 0 0 3 L 8 0 0 3 L 8 E E E 0 3 8 0 L 0 3 8 L 3 8 0 E L 0 E 0 E 0 0 3 0 L 8 3 L 8 0 0 0 3 L 8 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 L 3 8 0 L 3 8 L ¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 78 DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA

80 A

" 72 80 72 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL

60 A DIA DIA DIA B DIA DIA DIA

¡ DIA DIA DIA 71 ¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 71 84 HCGL HCGL HCGL 3007439 3007439 3007439 HCGL HCGL HCGL 3007439 3007439 3007439 HCGL HCGL HCGL DIA DIA DIA 3007439 3007439 3007439 DIA DIA DIA

¢ DIA DIA DIA "

¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL ¢

HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡ 84

HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡

76 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡

¡ 80

80 ¡

HCGL HCGL HCGL

¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡ ¡ 54 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 88 64 70 89 67

¢ 45

67

HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL

45 HCGL HCGL HCGL

0 0

E 6 0 3 L 0

E 0

6 E 6 0 3 L 3 L 3 L 6 E 0

E 0

3 L 6 3 0 L 6 E 0 0

0

E 6 0 3 0 L

E 6 0 3 0 L 0

E 6 0 3 L 3 L 6 0 0

E 3 L 6 0 0

E 3 L 6 0 0

E 70

E 6 0 3 0 L

E 0 3 0 L

6 E 0 3 0 L 6 3 L 6 0 0

3 L 6 E 0 0

3 L 6 E 0 0

E

¡

80 ¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 74 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 76 80 74 74 ¡ 76 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 70 ¡ ¢ 70

593,500 mE

¡ ¡

HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 85 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL

E 0 0 L E 4 0 0 3 4 0 0 L 4 E E 4 3 0 4 E L 0 3 3 0 E L 3 0 0 L L 4 0 3 E 0 0 L 4 3 E 3 L 0 4 4 0 E 0 3 L E 0 E 0 3 L 0 0 E L 4 4 0 0 3 0 L 4 3 E 3 E L 0 4 0 0 4 0 E 3 E L 0 0 0 L E 4 4 0 0 3 3 0 L L E 4 0 3 0 L 4 3 82 65

HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡ HCGL HCGL HCGL ¢ HCGL HCGL HCGL 85 80 65 82 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡

¡ 80

¡

20 ¡ 73 ¡

! HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS

20

85 ¡

¡ 84

85 B ¡

¡ 15 ¡

85 80

68

¡ ¡ !

¡

70 A 84

HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡ 15 87 68 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 76 HCGL HCGL HCGL 76 73 84 68 84 80 80 HCGL HCGL HCGL 80 HCGL HCGL HCGL 80 76 HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡ 85

HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL A 76 68

¡ ¡ 80 ¡ 78 ¡ 70 68 80 80 HCGL HCGL HCGL 88 86 87 HCGL HCGL HCGL 85 HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡¢¡ 80 76 ¢ A 85 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL

84

74 ¡ 80 88 ¡ A

86 ¡ 80

74

0

E

2 E 0 2 0 3 L 3 0 L

E 2 0 3 0 L E

2 0 L E 0

3 0 2 0 L E 0

3 2 0 L 3

E 0 3 0 L 2

E 2 0

E 3 0 L 0 3 0 L 2 E 0

2 0 L 3 E

2 0 L E 0

3 0 2 0 L 3

E 0 3 0 L

2 E 0 0 2 0 3 L 0

E 2 3 L E

2 0 L E 0

3 0 2 0 L E 0

3 2 0 L 3

N N N

N N N

N N N

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

5 5 5

5 5 5

5 5 5

4 4 4

4 4 4

4 4 4 HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS

HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS L L L

L L L

L L L

B B B

B B B

B B B HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 11 11 aayy wwaa hhww

iiigg

HH

E 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 0 3 L 3 L 3 L E 3 0 L 0 0 E 0 3 0 0 L 0 3 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 L 0 E 3 0 L 0 E 0 0 0 E 0 0 E 3 L 0 0 3 L 3 L 3 0 0 0 E L 0 0 0 E 0 3 0 0 E L 3 L 3 L 3 L 3 3 L 3 L L

593,000 mE A

A 76

88

E 8 0 2 0 L

E 0 2 0 L

8 E 0 0 8 2 L L2800 E E E L2800 L2800 L2800

E 0 0 8 2 L

E 0 0 0 8 0

E 2 8 L 2 L L2800 E E E L2800 L2800 L2800 0 0

E 8 2 L 0

E 0 L2800 E E E L2800 L2800 L2800

8 E 0 8 0 2 L 2 L HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL A HCGL HCGL HCGL HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HCGL HCGL HCGL HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 68 68 5 76

A 83 A 88 85 83 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 5 DIA DIA DIA

DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA

85 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL A HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL ! 75

A 78 75

78

t t t

t t t t t t

l l l

l l l l l l

HCGL HCGL HCGL

HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL

f f f

f f f f f f A HCGL HCGL HCGL

t t t HCGL HCGL HCGL

t t t HCGL HCGL HCGL

t t t

l l l

l l l

l l l

f f f

f f f

f f f 55 DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 55 76

A 80 A

HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL ¡

MV MV MV

MV MV MV

MV MV MV

80 76

0 E 0 0 E E 0 E E 0 E 0 E 0 0 6 E 2 0 0 0 L 6 6 2 2 0 L L 6 6 2 0 2 L L E 6 0 2 0 L E E 0 0 E 0 2 0 L 6 2 0 L 6 6 2 0 L 6 2 0 2 0 L L 6 E 0 2 0 L E 6 E 0 0 E E 0 0 E 0 6 2 L 2 0 L 6 0 2 0 L 6 L 6 2 0 0 6 L 6 2 2 0 L HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL 83 83 60 HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL HCGL A HCGL HCGL HCGL

FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI ¡ 70 i 80 LAMP LAMP LAMP LAMP LAMP LAMP

LAMP LAMP LAMP

80 q MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV 66 56 66 80 82 72

¡ q 82

A i

MV MV MV MV MV MV ¡ MV MV MV

56 72 80 A 80 ¡ 78 80 3003902 3003902 3003902 80 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV 592,500 mE 80 MV MV MV 58 MV MV MV

MV MV MV ¡ 70 75 80 58

76 ¡ 64 A 70 82 FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI ¡ 80 75 82 FI FI FI FI FI FI A FI FI FI A 75 76 64

75 ¡ A

QV QV QV QV QV QV QV QV QV

20 A FI FI FI A FI FI FI

FI FI FI 20 FI FI FI FI FI FI 60 FI FI FI

FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV # Qv Qv Qv Qv Qv Qv Qv Qv Qv

! ¡ 20 80 QCV QCV QCV 80 QCV QCV QCV

QCV QCV QCV ¡ 20 20 20

FI FI FI

FI FI FI

FI FI FI

60 65

4 0 2 0

L E 2 0

L E 0

4 E 0 4 0 2 L 2 L 4 0 0

2 L 4 E 0 0

2 L 4 E 0 E 0

E 4 0 2 0 L 4 0 2 0

L E 2 0

L E 4 0 2 L 4 0 0

E 2 L 4 0 0

E 2 L 4 0 0

E 4 0 2 0

L E 2 0

L E 0

4 E 0 4 0 2 L 2 L 4 0 0

2 L 4 E 0 0

2 L 4 E 0 0

¡ E MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV 80 ! 80 40

A 65

! ! 40 80 80 MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV 80 80

75 80 A MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV A A 80 FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI 75 MV, FI MV, FI MV, FI MV, FI MV, FI MV, FI MV, FI MV, FI MV, FI DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA 82 ¡ DIA DIA DIA

40 82 ¡ 58 FI FI FI FI FI FI 86 FI FI FI A FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI A 80 40 58 86 80

¡

0 0 0 E E E 2 0 2 0 L 2 0 0 L 2 L 2 E 2 E 0 E 0 0 L 2 2 2 0 L 2 E 0 0 0 E E L 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 L 2 0 L 2 L 2 2 MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV 70 60

A 70

60 B MV MV MV MV MV MV A MV MV MV 85 85 FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI FI

A A 80 80 QV QV QV QV QV QV QV QV QV 80 80 50 ¡ 85 50 A FI FI FI FI FI FI

¡ FI FI FI 78 85

¡ 78 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003905

3003903 3003903 3003903 3003903 3003903 3003903 3003903 3003903 3003903

0 2 L 2 0

L E

0 E 0 L2000 E E E L2000 L2000 L2000 0 0 0 2 0 L 0

E 0 2 0 0

L E 2 0 0

L 0 E 0 2 0

L E 0 L2000 E E E L2000 L2000 L2000 2 0

L E

0 E 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 L 2 0

L E L2000 E E E L2000 L2000 L2000 592,000 mE

A 60 HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS HSEDS 80 60 80

A

E 0 0 8 1 L E 0 0 8 1 L E 0 0 8 1 L E 0 0 8 1 L E 0 0 8 E 1 L 0 0 8 1 L E 0 0 8 1 L E 0 0 8 1 L E 0 0 8 1 L

A FI FI FI FI FI FI 70 FI FI FI 70 70

B A 70 3003904 3003904 3003904 3003904 3003904 3003904 3003904 3003904 3003904

HSEDs HSEDs HSEDs HSEDs HSEDs HSEDs HSEDs HSEDs HSEDs

5,236,000 mN 5,236,000 mN 5,235,500 mN 5,235,000 mN 5,234,500 mN 0 E 5,230,000 mN 5,232,000 mN 5,234,000 mN 5,236,000 mN 5,238,000 mN GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITSOUTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH GILLIES LIMITNORTH

Temex Claimwithnumber 590,000 mE Township, AreaBoundary 3007438 3007438 3007438 3007438 3007438 3007438 3007438 3007438 3007438 BRIGSTOCKE BRIGSTOCKE BRIGSTOCKE 3011795 3011795 3011795 BRIGSTOCKE BRIGSTOCKE BRIGSTOCKE 3011795 3011795 3011795 BRIGSTOCKE BRIGSTOCKE BRIGSTOCKE 3011795 3011795 3011795 1203054 1203054 1203054 1203054 1203054 1203054 1203054 1203054 1203054 4206343 4206343 4206343 4206343 4206343 4206343 4206343 4206343 4206343 BEST BEST BEST BEST BEST BEST BEST BEST BEST 3013797 3013797 3013797 3013797 3013797 3013797 3013797 3013797 3013797 3007434 3007434 3007434 3007434 3007434 3007434 3007434 3007434 3007434 3011783 3011783 3011783 3011797 3011797 3011797 3011783 3011783 3011783 3011797 3011797 3011797 3011783 3011783 3011783 3011797 3011797 3011797 3003904 3003904 3003904 3007431 3007431 3007431 3003904 3003904 3003904 3007431 3007431 3007431 3003904 3003904 3003904 3007431 3007431 3007431 1203053 1203053 1203053 1203053 1203053 1203053 1203053 1203053 1203053 3003903 3003903 3003903 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003903 3003903 3003903 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003903 3003903 3003903 3003905 3003905 3003905 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 3003902 3008958 3008958 3008958 3008958 3008958 3008958 3008958 3008958 3008958 592,000 mE 3008957 3008957 3008957 3008957 3008957 3008957 3008957 3008957 3008957 3007432 3007432 3007432 3007432 3007432 3007432 3007432 3007432 3007432 3007435 3007435 3007435 3007435 3007435 3007435 3007435 3007435 3007435 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3011807 3018979 3018979 3018979 3018979 3018979 3018979 3018979 3018979 3018979 3018984 3018984 3018984 3018984 3018984 3018984 3018984 3018984 3018984 500 0 3007439 3007439 3007439 3007439 3007439 3007439 3007439 3007439 3007439 UTM Nad27Zone17 metres 1,000

594,000 mE 3007436 3007436 3007436 3007436 3007436 3007436 3007436 3007436 3007436 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 3011794 3018983 3018983 3018983 4243548 4243548 4243548 3018983 3018983 3018983 4243548 4243548 4243548 3018983 3018983 3018983 4243548 4243548 4243548 3007433 3007433 3007433 3007433 3007433 3007433 3007433 3007433 3007433 3018980 3018980 3018980 3018980 3018980 3018980 3018980 3018980 3018980

1231138 1231138 1231138 1231138 1231138 1231138 1231138 1231138 1231138

H

i

g

h w

a

y

1 1 1221578 1221578 1221578 1221578 1221578 1221578 1221578 1221578 1221578 4243549 4243549 4243549 4243549 4243549 4243549 4243549 4243549 4243549 3018981 3018981 3018981 3018981 3018981 3018981 1219926 1219926 1219926 3018981 3018981 3018981 1219926 1219926 1219926 1219926 1219926 1219926 4243546 4243546 4243546 4243546 4243546 4243546 4243546 4243546 4243546 4243547 4243547 4243547 4243547 4243547 4243547 4243547 4243547 4243547 3018982 3018982 3018982 3018982 3018982 3018982 3018982 3018982 3018982 596,000 mE 1249729 1249729 1249729 1249729 1249729 1249729 1249729 1249729 1249729