THE INTERNATIONAL CAT ASSOCIATION, INC. 2014 Winter Board Meeting January 24-26, 2014 Harlingen, TX

Open Session January 24, 2014, Friday, 9:00AM ACTION TIME PAGE Welcome and Call to Order 9:00-9:30AM 1. Roll Call Fisher Verbal...... - 2. Welcome Board Fisher Verbal...... - 3. Fiduciary Responsibility Adler Verbal ...... -

Consent Agenda 9:30-9:40AM 1. Minutes, Corrections/Additions EO Approve...... - 2. Follow Up Report EO Approve ...... 5

Governance 9:40-10:15AM 1. Future Annuals, Semi-Annuals Fisher Approve ...... 6 Change date of Spring Meeting of Spring Meeting to 5/23-25/14 2. Appointment to the HHP Breed Committee Hogan Approve ...... 7 3. Amend Governance Policy- Publishing Minutes of the Executive Session Meetings Board Approve...... 8 4. Online Entry Program Patton Discuss...... 11

Break – 10:15-10:30AM

Fiduciary 10:30 – 11:00AM 1. FY2012 Audit Report EO Accept ...... 12 2. Budget Report-First Six Months EO Accept ...... to be furnished 3. Set Winter Meeting BOD Board Approve...... - Reimbursements 4. Discount for use of TOES Stadter Approve ...... 27

Lunch: 11:30 - 1:00PM

Executive Session 1-5PM - Strategic Business Discussion and Exercise See Executive Agenda January 25, 2014, Saturday, 8:30AM ACTION TIME PAGE

Open Session: 8:30-11:30PM

PROPOSALS Judging Program 1. Amend 417.3 - Code of Ethics Lopez Approve ...... 29 2. Amend Judging Contract - Mileage Basquine Approve ...... 31

Standing Rules 1. Amend 204.3 - Show Fee van den Donations Bunder Approve ...... 33 2. Amend 209.4.3 - Height of Judging Tables Basquine Approve ...... 35 3. Amend 2013.1 - Permission to Judge ParkinsonApprove ...... 36

Break – 10:15-10:30AM Show Rules 1. Amend 22.4 - Publicizing of Shows Stadter Discussion...... 37 2. Show week vs Show weekend Rules Discussion...... 39

Lunch: 11:30 - 1:00PM

1:00-2:00PM Breed Committee Appointments 1. Turkish Angora Committee a. Machuka EO Approve...... 43 b. Vega EO Approve...... 44

Breeds 1. Burmese/Bombay Klamm Approve a. BU/BO Proposal ...... 45 b. Burmese/Bombay- Rules/Genetics Comments ...... 58 c. Response to Rules ...... 60 2. Turkish Van Tadajewski Approve a. Turkish Van Standard change ...... 62 b. Turkish Van-Rules/Genetics Comments ...... 63 3. Scottish Straight- a. Advancement to Championship Hogan Approve ...... 64 b. Standard ...... 67 c. Scottish Straight- Rules/Genetics Comments ...... 68 4. Highlander a. Request for Polydactyl Lively Approve ...... 69 b. Highlander Standard w/polydactyl ...... 70 c. Highlander Standard w/o polydactyl ...... 72 d. Highlander Standard Change-Rules/Genetics Comments ...... 74 SUPPLEMENTAL INFO

1. 2013-2014 Show Season Counts ...... 75 2. 2013-2014 Show Season Detail Report ...... 76 3. 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report ...... 79 4. Weekend Catalog List ...... 93 5. Active Regional Clubs ...... 96 No. ITEM LEAD STATUS

1 Program prefixes and genetics into Registration Program EO Pending Show Rule 22.2 Show Formats was sent back to Rules to put a ceiling on Rules W2014 2 number of entries a club can take. 3 Judge cannot judge 3 times in an Alternative format show . Rules 4 Definition of a show week. Rules W2014 5 22.3.1 The maximum number of entries a club may accept is limited as Rules W2014 follows: 22.3.1.1 Alternative Format - 125 entries. (See Show Rule 21.16.) 22.3.1.2 Back-to-Back Format - 250 entries. (See Show Rule 21.14.) 22.3.1.3 Split Format (2-day Show) - 500 250 entries per day. (See Show Rule 21.15 and Show Rule 216.4.) 6 Newby v Bliss tabled Adler W2014 Genetic tests for Hereditary Defects GCCF is proud of their leadership. Clearinghouse for testing from Leslie Lyons. Ellen will interface with Leslie 7 Lyons and act as a conduit. Crockett W2014 8 Audit report acceptance at the winter meeting. Fisher W2014 9 The President will look into investment opportunities. Fisher W2014 10 Policy statement for the Japan situation for review at the winter meeting Adler W2014 11 Draft for WCC for the President to take to the WCC March meeting Adler W2014 12 Amend Standing Rule 209.1.1.6.1 - strike out Official Entry Form. Rules W2014 13 Amend Standing Rule 209.2 to read:All entries must be on the official TICA Entry Form or an electronic equivalent that includes the same information and includes an agreement to abide by and uphold the Rules of this Association. Rules W2014 14 Pursue possible contract to update the rules of the association. Fisher W2014 15 Define show weekend to define the show week and look at others places within the rules that include the term show weekend Rules W2014 16 Program notice to clients when work is received and in process Hart W2014

5 12/10/13 Future Meetings

Year Meeting Club/EO City/State Date of Meeting 2014 Winter EO Harlingen, TX 01/24-26/2014 2014 Spring Electronic 05/23-25/2014* 2014 Annual NE Worcester, MA 08/27-29/2014 2015 Annual Blue Danube CC Salzburg, Austria 09/02-04/2015 2016 Annual SW San Diego, CA 08/31-09/02/2016

109.1 Annual Convention.

109.1.1 Annual Convention. Labor Day weekend each year is reserved for the Annual Convention. No other shows may be held the weekend of the Annual Convention with the following exception. A club may receive permission to hold a show on the Annual weekend upon application to the Board. Application must state specific reasons for the request for exemption and why such a show would have no impact on the Annual. 109.1.1.1 The rotation for the Annual Conventions shall be: Mid Pacific - 2010, Mid Atlantic - 2011, Great Lakes - 2012, Northwest -2013, Northeast - 2014, International - 2015, Southwest - 2016, South Central - 2008, Southeast - 2009. 109.1.1.2 Proposals to host the Annual Convention in the designated region must be received for the Annual Meeting 3 years prior to the proposed convention. 109.1.1.3 In the event no club submits an acceptable proposal, any club in any region may submit a proposal to host the Annual Convention by the agenda deadline for the Semi-Annual Meeting 2½ years prior to the convention and a notice soliciting such proposals shall be published in the TICA TREND. 109.1.1.4 The subsequent designated order of rotation will remain the same.

109.2 Meetings of the Board.

109.2.1 All Board Meetings shall be scheduled for a minimum of 2 days. 109.2.1.1 Meetings of the Board shall be the fourth full weekend in January (Winter Meeting, the third full weekend in May (Spring Meeting) and the week immediately preceding Labor Day weekend (TICA Annual). 109.2.1.2 The Winter Meeting shall be held in Harlingen TX without a show OR at a location outside the United States in conjunction with a show, approved by the Board. 109.2.1.3 The Spring Meeting shall be held in the United States, rotating from Central to West to East, with or without a show. The meeting venue must be at or near a major international airport at a hotel with adequate meeting space, full restaurant service and airport shuttle. 109.2.1.4 The Winter and Spring meeting locations shall be selected by the Board without consideration of accompanying show. 109.2.1.5 Minutes of all meetings of the Board of Directors shall be completed within 10 working days following the meeting.

6 Hi Ladies,

I’d like to add an item to the Winter BOD Meeting Agenda. I would like us to appoint Caroline Fralia, Beth Edwards and Hellen Pounds to the currently inactive HHP Breed Committee. They all understand that if appointed they will all bring their memberships current to through the end of this term, December 2014. They are also now interested in running for this position in next year’s election and would have before but were not sure how it all worked.

Just as a bit of explanation to you…there are 2 HHP Committees in TICA. One is the regular Breed Section/Committee and the second one is an appointed committee. It is the regular elected Breed Committee that is currently inactive and these three ladies are active in showing HHPs and want to serve on this committee.

Just so you can see the 2 Committees, here is the link to the Breed Committee http://www.tica.org/public/breeds/hh/committee.php and here is the appointed Committee http://www.tica.org/members/commitees/hhp.php

I gathered names from the RDs at the Annual but I thought that was for the appointed HHP Committee but I see now that is not missing any people. I would hate to start appointing people who don’t even know their name is up for service to an elected position on the Breed Committee so I am only asking for appointment for the 3 ladies who originally expressed an interest to me.

Confusing, I know! Hope I made this clear enough for you.

Many thanks,

Cheryl Hogan

7 Amend Board Governance Policy (Fisher)

Work Item Description:

Amend Board Governance Policy to clarify how votes for items in Executive Session are recorded to reflect concerns raised by some Board members. Votes on contracts and protests would be open to disclosure.

Rationale:

Disclosing votes for personnel matters and judging advancement is against decency and is a potential embarrassment to those involved.

Disclosing votes on matters under negotiation, especially anything of a legal nature, is potentially damaging.

Amendments:

Publishing Minutes of the Executive Session Meetings

of the TICA Board of Directors

Article Nine of the By-Laws provides that the Board of Directors may go into closed session if the matter under discussion concerns personnel matters, contract negotiations, is of such a nature that it may be embarrassing, derogatory or humiliating to a member or is of a sensitive business nature related to business strategy for the organization. The Article further makes public to the membership the results of all actions by the Board, other than those relating to pending contract negotiations or those relating to charges, complaints or protests which have been found to be groundless.

It is the policy of the Board that the minutes of its meetings are reported consistent with the By Law provisions and in a uniform manner. Therefore, the Board adopts the following guidelines for publishing minutes of its Executive Session meetings.

Reporting Executive Sessions

It is expected that the published minutes of the general board meeting record that the Board went into executive session, the purpose of the session, and the outcome of the discussion. For example, the general minutes of the meeting may record that, “the Board went into executive session to consider advancement and re-licensing of judges.”

The general minutes would then record the outcome of that consideration, including the name of the maker and second of the motion. For votes on any issues involving personnel matters or matters that may be embarrassing, derogatory or humiliating to a member, the outcome of voting on motions will be either noted as “carried” or “denied”. The same is true for votes involving contract negotiations. The use of “carried unanimously” shall be used only if requested by the Chair and agreed to by the Board.

8 For votes on issues involving approving contracts and taking action on protests, the individual votes of the Board Members will be recorded.

Exempt from reporting in the general minutes would be the outcome of charges, complaints or protests which were found to be groundless. In accordance with Standing Rule 109.2.7, the Board will maintain separate minutes of the executive session meeting, in the form of a confidential addendum, if discussions and actions are taken on matters prohibited from dissemination to Members under By Law 19.2.7.

Rules Comments:

(KV) I am for full disclosure of ALL votes. I think that every TICA-member has the right to know where each Board-Member stands - and the Board Members should be taken responsible from the members of their region for all their actions.

The only exception I would make would be the voting on judges (but I believe that those votes are still anonymous - am I right?). A "passed" vs. "denied" would be okay as it might be that the standing of a certain judge at shows might be less if members knew that there were some votes against. On the other hand - hey, that's a fact and we should be a really "open" association.

All discussions should be secret in the Executive Sessions, but not the votes.

(EC) I am SO opposed to changing the rules that we have had for so long which have served us well.

(AB) I agree with Ellen. Actually I don't have a problem with how it is now,

(TJ) Personally, I think matters of protest, complaints, judges stuff and personnel matters should always be held in executive session. There are privacy issues involved with those.

I would like to know how my RD votes on certain things but I don't really care about the discussion. Since the membership supports this association I do feel we need to know what's going on.

I would just like to know how people voted except in the above mentioned.

(SA) I agree but I think it would ease the job of the RDs if we could disclose some of the reasoning (rather than an RD being criticized for having voted a certain way and being unable to explain their position) I think 90% of the voting membership is capable of understanding differing points of view although the other 10% might be the most vocal.

(MW) On occasions, a Board member has asked to add a comment explaining why they voted the way that they did. I don't think anything has ever been written down about what protocol to follow for this but I think that it is prudent to restrict those comments to where the voting record is open.

As far as I can tell, there is nothing in TICA's rules that dictates that the voting results (i.e. how each Director voted) be made public. Roberts does suggest this but our By-laws state that "Meetings will be guided by Roberts Rules of Order, Revised". I take that to mean that TICA should use Roberts as a guide but not slavishly follow it.

9 So I think you the Governance Policy can be amended as suggested without necessarily having a By-law change.

When voting on complaints, having to be accountable for their individual vote may well focus the RDs' minds to think through the issues and vote accordingly.

10 OK Vickie

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Laurie Patton wrote:

I would just like a little time set aside to talk about the TOES program

Thank you,

Laurie

I am sending from the iPhone please excuse my typos :)

On Nov 11, 2013, at 3:41 PM, "[email protected]" wrote:

Hi all. If you have anything for the January agenda, please let me know ASAP. If you have proposals which need to be reviewed by Rules please get them to Rules ASAP ASAP VICKIE

Sent from my iPad

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Erwin has asked that the Board consider: 1. May a discount be granted to clubs using TOES and not requiring supplies from the EO 2. What would be an appropriate level of discount

SUPPLIES AVG PER SHIPPED PER SHOW COST U.S. Shows Non U.S. Shows Regions SHOWS SHIPPING SHOW SUPPLIES TOTAL TOTAL % SHOWS % Cost % Cost

AA 39 2160 55.38 16 71.38 2784.00 16.74% 16.74 2784.00 GL 15 279 18.60 16 34.60 519.00 6.44% 6.44 519.00 MA 10 304 30.40 16 46.40 464.00 4.29% 4.29 464.00 MP 10 174 17.40 16 33.40 334.00 4.29% 4.29 334.00 NE 12 221 18.42 16 34.42 413.00 5.15% 5.15 413.00 EN 29 1683 58.03 16 74.03 2147.00 12.45% 12.45 2147 NW 13 424 32.62 16 48.62 632.00 5.58% 5.58 632.00 SA 13 620 47.69 16 63.69 828.00 5.58% 5.58 828 SC 19 302 15.89 16 31.89 606.00 9.87% 9.87 606.00 SE 23 408 17.74 16 33.74 776.00 9.87% 9.87 776.00 ES 24 1271 52.96 16 68.96 1655.00 10.30% 10.30 1655 SW 13 212 16.31 16 32.31 420.00 5.58% 5.58 420.00 EW 13 878 67.54 16 83.54 1086.00 5.58% 5.58 1086

233 8936 12664.00 101.72% 51.07 4164.00 50.65 8500.00

SHOWS/ SHEETS/SHOW PER THOUS 200AVG FINALS 50 44.5 1.75 BOOKS 200SHPW 71 14.2 15.95

27 Below is an overview of number of shows using TOES as their entry tool, per region. Obviously, since we are growing this may still change quite a bit. (new regions to start using it) For now 70% of the ‘TOES’ shows are non US. But I think it is save to say that could easily go to 50/50 in 2014

Best regards

Erwin

Jul Aug‐Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan‐Feb Mar Apr May‐Jun Aug Sept Oct Nov‐Dec % Non US1 46 93833 4 213573% US 2 4 5 1 1 2 2 2 27%

Grand Tota 1 610144935 6 4135

28 Judging Program 417.3 (Bright/Lopez)

Work Item Description: Define the meaning of “417.3 Participants in the Judging Program are representatives of TICA at all times, and shall conduct themselves as such” as it relates to TICA Judging participants and their activities with other associations.

Rationale:

Participants in the TICA Judging Program should be representatives and ambassadors for TICA. While representing TICA as a guest judge and showing cats in other associations is acceptable, it is questionable as to whether being an official of another association's club or conducting and promoting a show sanctioned by another association, is in the best interest of TICA.

Amendment:

Article Seventeen - Code of Ethics

417.3 Participants in the Judging Program are representatives of TICA at all times, and shall conduct themselves as such.

417.3.1 TICA Judges will not serve as a club officer in another cat association that completes with TICA in putting on shows.

417.3.2 TICA Judges will not be part of a show committee that puts on shows in a cat association other than TICA.

417.3.2.1 The exception to 417.3.2 is a show management role in a show that is coordinating shows from multiple organizations at the same time and in the same venue as long as a TICA show is included as one of the shows.

Rules Comments:

(CL) This proposal is not in conflict with our By-Laws or Show Rules.

TICA always has been very open with participants in the Judging Program showing in other cat associations, letting our judges to hold licenses with other associations and even not excluding these judges with multiple licenses to run for official positions. Our flexibility is a strength. However, it is not acceptable for TICA judges to run and promote clubs and shows for competing cat organizations, the only exception should be when a multiple show being held in the same venue and TICA is present with a show.

(EC) I think that this is aimed at two individuals in South America. We shouldn't be passing rules with someone's name on them.

(AB) While Ellen's comment is probably true I think it is indicative of a much wider problem where our TICA judges have conflicts of interests and those can be perceived as actively working against TICA. While I would not like to see us prevent all interchange with other

29 associations, I do think there comes a point when such conflicts, such as the situation this rule is trying to address, need to be resolved.

(TJ) There needs to be some degree of loyalty to an organization that issues you a license. Judges, for the most part, are the "face" of the organization and perception is everything. If people perceive that there is no loyalty and we are all holding different licenses, then the organization loses credibility.

(MW) I worry that this amendment focuses attention solely on show/club management in other associations – there are other behavioural aspects that Judges need to be aware of.

30 Judging Contract Amendment (Basquine)

Work Item Description:

Amend the mileage rate used in the TICA Judging Contract to use the official rate in the Judge’s country of residence.

Rationale:

There are significant rate differences between US and several other countries because of gas taxes, cost of labour etc.

Amendment:

“The Club will reimburse to the Judge the following, in the event the Club has not arranged to pay these expenses directly: ,,,,,, f. Mileage at the prevailing rate allowed by the Internal Revenue Service regulations, or the official rate set forth by Government in the Country of residence of the judge.”

Rules Comments:

(AB) The problem with this amendment is that the judge may live in one country and incur expenses like gas in another country when driving to a show. The differences can be significant and could end up costing the judge money if their country has a lower mileage rate. Genevieve's comment is correct but the country of residence may have a lower rate than the countries traveled through. If we're going to set it as a variable rate, then I think it needs qualification in a couple of ways:

“or the official rate set forth by the Government in the country of residence of the judge or the official rate set forth by the government of the country of the show venue whichever is higher.”

(EC) Again, I think this will be a nightmare to administer - and conceivably would put judges who live in a high rate country at a disadvantage with the clubs.

(AB) I agree Ellen

(MW) Whilst I agree that fuel costs vary considerably across the world, to use more than one rate could be administratively complex. How would clubs be able to know what is the "correct" rate for a non-US judge?

(TJ) Personally, I think things would get really complicated if we have to start doing that.

(SA) I think the change would not be that difficult to administer as it would be used mostly in Europe. It really doesn't make sense to be using the term "Internal revenue service" when this only applies to American shows.

31 (TJ) The term IRS rate doesn't just apply to American shows...it's the rate all clubs worldwide pay. It's just the set rate. If European or Japanese clubs want to pay more, let them...this is the basic rate they have to pay.

(KV) As an European judge I think that the best way concerning the mileage rate would be as follows -

There should be an individual mileage rate for each country. BUT - I do not support Genevieve's proposal as her solution is linked to the place where the judge lives.

I would rather see the mileage rate linked to the number of kilometers/miles driven in each country.

Is this a bit complicated? Yes - but - as I still believe in mankind - I think that judges and club managers are intelligent enough to find out the mileage rate for each country. As in Europe some countries have lesser gas-prices then the judge could refill there!

32 Standing Rule 204.3 – Show Fee Donations (van den Bunder)

Work Item Description: Amend the Standing Rules regarding donations to the Regional Fund from show fees. Rationale:

Tthe goal of the regional fund is to support the region to carry all expenses (regional awards, expenses for regional director, ...)

Many clubs do not request their exhibitors to contribute to the regional fund, and therefore the region often finds itself in a position where not enough funds are available to support new clubs, to aid in TICA’s growth, to assure nice regional awards, even to cover international flights for the regional director (costs beyond the default amount paid by TICA).

Introducing a mandatory fee that is in the order of magnitude of $1 per exhibitor or per entry would completely resolve this problem. This is not a cost that would scare away exhibitors or negatively impact counts. It would however assure that all clubs aid in the growth of their region.

Additionally, if a situation would arise where the region has too much funds, it can always donate/sponsor to the clubs organizing the shows.

Amendment:

204.3

At the option of the Each club, for each entry, shall may include a nominal fee to help defray the cost of expenses of the Regional Director. Said fee, to be determined by the club, shall not exceed be a minimum of $1 per entry.

204.3.1 The club shall account for and remit such fees to the regional fund Rules Comments:

(MW) Personally, I am very much in sympathy with Erwin's proposal and rationale for the change.

However, when a similar change was discussed by the Board some time ago (I think it was in Japan at the Winter 2010 meeting) the then Legal Counsel advised the Board that it must continue to be discretionary and not a compulsory levy.

Her reasoning was that by making it a mandatory fee, TICA was controlling an element of the club's finances - thus reducing their independence from TICA - and thus increasing the risk that TICA would then become financially liable for any clubs' (i.e. plural clubs) deficits. That was not a risk that TICA should accept.

33 (SA) I am in agreement with Laurie (that it should remain discretionary) to the extent that the clubs operate in many different states and countries and it is impossible to know how each jurisdiction will interpret this.

(EC) While I see the logic of what Laurie advised at the time, be aware that CFA has a mandatory surcharge to their clubs right now.

I wonder if another way to do this might be for it to be a "regional fee" collected by the EO and remitted to the regions at the same time as the awards fee.

We charge clubs license fees and remit some of that back - so I'm not sure how this would be different.

(SA) We could probably get around that by making it an "EO fee" rather than a compulsory donation.

(CL) I agree with Susan. Maybe a fee for shows up to 50 / 100 / 200 / more entries.

This can impact in different ways according if we are talking a small show, regular or large.

(TJ) The only thing that concerns me about it and it really isn't my personal thoughts on it but TICA has always left clubs alone for the most part..i.e, never telling them what or how to run their business. I think something like "requiring" each club to submit a $1 per entry is going to encroach on control. But...I think if we are careful how the rule is worded and put into play it won't violate the spirit of TICA clubs...does that make sense? This is also going to require the cooperation of regional treasurers. They will have to hound the clubs for the money. If a dollar is added and that money belongs to the region then the club will need to send that money off the top.

(KV) I would not like to see the EO handle those fees. It is more work for the office. I think that the clubs should send the money to the Regional Treasurers - which is so easy nowadays...

I think that those regional fees are important to cover costs for the region and the RDs throughout the whole show-season (Meetings). As the rebate nowadays only can be used towards the Regional Awards Ellen's proposal would mean that the RDs would have to wait for their money quite a long time before getting reimbursed for their expenses (I am thinking e.g. of flight-tickets for overseas flights - TICA only reimburses USD 800,-)

34 Amend Standing Rule 209.4.3 (Height of Judging Tables) – Basquine

Work Item:

Amend Standing Rule to make the height of judging tables mandatory

Rationale:

To minimise back ache in judges whilst they are judging.

Each time I ask for raised tables on which my judging cages are placed, the club agree to do it, but I'm embarrassed with respect to other judges who have to deal with low tables.

Amendment:

209.4.3 Cages. Cages in judging rings must be placed on tables or other solid support. Collapsible trestles are not acceptable.

209.4.3.1 Whenever possible, the The tables on which the judging cages are placed shall have leg extenders to raise the height of the tables to between 34 and 38 inches (89 and 97 centimeters) from the floor.

Rules Comments:

(EC) I agree - we made it optional to allow for time for the clubs/cage services to make the required changes - now we need to make it mandatory

(TJ) My back is very grateful also. I felt it at our regional-;)

We just need to make sure that caging services and clubs know it's going to be enforced so everyone has adequate time to make necessary arrangements if the proper table legs aren't there.

(SA) For all practical purposes, there would have to be some way to give adequate notice of this rule. It has to reach the caging services.

(EC) The "whenever possible" has been in effect for at least 5-6 years - they are choosing to ignore it.

If we pass it, it would go into effect with the start of the new show year May 1.

(AB) I agree although I am wondering if we should say leg extenders as some clubs have tables with legs the appropriate length.

(EC) Or we say "shall have leg extenders to raise the height of the tables to between 34 and 38 inches (89-97 centimeters) from the floor, or have legs of the required length".

(AB) Yes Ellen I think that is a good way to phrase it -- we need to ensure it isn't too prescriptive. We need to ensure the intent not necessarily the implementation.

(BT) I think it should be submitted as Genevieve sent it to us...... with her rationale. The board can always send it back if they are not happy with the wording.

35 Amend Standing Rule 2013.1 (Parkinson)

Work Item Description:

Amend existing rule to permit TICA judges to guest judge a non-TICA show anywhere.

Rationale:

The rule as written is confusing and ambiguous. Furthermore, we don’t have reciprocal agreements with other associations in North America.

Amendment:

Amend the following Standing Rule:

2013.1 Permission to Judge. A TICA judge may judge any TICA show any place at any time. Only licensed TICA Allbreed judges may judge non-TICA shows outside North America.

Rules Comments:

(CL) Fine with me

(SL) Agreed !

(MA) I am going to be a devil’s advocate here and ask if new Prov AB judge should be taking on this type of assignment. I believe at one time these assignments were limited to only Approved AB due to experience.

(EC) I'd prefer Approved AB

(TJ) I thought at one time you had to be an Approved Allbreed judge. I don't have a problem with it being Approved Allbreed judges only.

(AB) I don't have a problem with Approved AB either.

(SA) OK with me

(CL) I think it would be best to let the Board discuss and decide, with MaryLou, whether the stricter proposal would be appropriate.

(KV) I think that our Prov AB Judges are already experienced enough to judge outside of TICA. So from my point of view there is absolutely no need to restrict this to Approved AB Judges.

(MW) Whilst the proposed rule change is formatted correctly, I also think that it might be sensible for the Board to restrict this to Approved AB judges only. Essentially, guest judging elsewhere is being an ambassador for TICA – not just having AB judging experience.

36 Amend 22.4 (Publicizing of Shows) (Stadter/Wood)

Work Item:

Revise Show Rule 22.4 so that all TICA licensed shows are publicized for at least 30 days prior to the show date on the TICA web site and any additional publicity channels selected by the club.

Rationale:

The intent of 22.4.1 is that there shouldn’t be any “secret” or “invitation only” shows. All potential exhibitors should have the opportunity to enter any show.

Applying for a show license is a transaction between the club and the Executive Office. If a show license is applied for too late, the Executive Office charges an extra fee according to show rule 202.4.4 (after the addition of rule below that would be 204.4.5). The exhibitors of a show must not be punished for a club not applying for the show license on time.

The suggested wording ensures that all potential exhibitors should be able to enter a show. If a club should fail to comply with the rule a complaint can be filed and the responsible persons can be punished.

Amendment:

22.4 Show Licenses. 22.4.1 A show shall not be held under the auspices of this association, nor shall the cats entered in that show be awarded any regional, international and/or title points, unless the show has been published issued a show license at least 30 days prior to the first date of the show on the approved show calendar of the Association. (see Standing Rule 202.4.3) 22.4.2 A show license must be applied for at least 60 days prior to the first date of the show. 22.4.23 A show license shall be issued upon the following requirements having been met: 22.4.32.1 A completed show application has been submitted, listing the total number of rings, type of rings (AB, SP, HHP and/or congress); 22.4.32.2 The club applying for the show license is in good standing; 22.4.32.3 The application is accompanied by the insurance fee, or that fee has been waived.

22.4.34 All fees must be paid to Executive Office at least 30 days prior to the opening day of the show unless other arrangements have been made in writing with the Executive Office. 22.4.45 Show licenses issued to clubs employing a show production company must be issued jointly to the club and the show production company.

If the rule is passed by the membership, the following Standing Rules Changes will also be made:

Add new rule 204.4.4 and renumber the rule following it to 204.4.5

202.4.4 The show must be publicized at least 30 days prior to the first date of the show in the show calendar on the official TICA web site. In addition to this, clubs are encouraged to use other available means to publicize their shows.

202.4.5 Late Show License Application. The Executive Office shall charge a $25 late Application for Show License Fee to any club that does not have the proper paperwork in the hands of the Executive Office staff 60 days prior to the show.

Rules Comments:

37 (BT) Fine with me

(EC) Me too

(TJ) Fine with me. I think it covers everything.

(SA) I agree. I would rather the tica.org calendar be mandatory.

38 Show Week vs Show Weekend (Board Directive)

Work Item Description;

From the Annual 2013 Board meeting: “A follow-up item was agreed, to ask the Rules Committee to look at what would be necessary to define a Show Week and update any rules that define Show Weekend”

Rules Comments:

The central issue is whether the Board’s intention is to determine the maximum number of times a cat can be judged in a given time period or to prevent a single judge seeing a single cat more than a certain number of times in a given period.

Without that clarity, it is not possible to provide amendments to define a “Show Week” and update the relevant rules. This is a non-trivial task as the following list of affected rules demonstrates.

The consensus of the Rules Committee was that a limit on how many times a cat could be judged in a time period would be an appropriate route for the Board to take. There were diverging views on whether to specify, in addition, a “rest period” for cats between any two shows.

Affected Rules:

By-laws: None

Associated Standing Rules:

109.1.1 Annual Convention. Labor Day weekend each year is reserved for the Annual Convention. No other shows may be held the weekend of the Annual Convention with the following exception. A club may receive permission to hold a show on the Annual weekend upon application to the Board. Application must state specific reasons for the request for exemption and why such a show would have no impact on the Annual.

109.2.1 All Board Meetings shall be scheduled for a minimum of 2 days.

109.2.1.1 Meetings of the Board shall be the fourth full weekend in January (Winter Meeting), the third full weekend in May (Spring Meeting) and the week immediately preceding Labor Day weekend (TICA Annual)

Registration Rules: None

39 Show Rules:

22.1.2 Show Dates. When a club desires a show date from the Regional Director, they may request that date in writing. After 30 days, there being no response from the Regional Director, the club may proceed with the show date, scheduling it through the Executive Office by providing the Executive Office with a copy of the written request.

22.1.2.1 The Regional Director may deny a club a specific show date if there is a previously scheduled TICA show within 500 miles (805 kilometers) or in the same region on the requested weekend.

22.1.2.2 If there are multiple show requests for the same show weekend, shows may be held within 500 miles (805 kilometers) of each other only with both A and B below:

A. Written permission from the show managers, and

B. Written permission of the regional director or regional directors if the show requests are from multiple regions.

The first club that requests a show date is authorized to have the show.

22.2.1 A back-to-back show is two or more shows, held on consecutive days. For scoring purposes, each day is considered a different show. With the following exceptions:

22.2.1.1 If May 1 is a Sunday in any given year, all shows on any day in that same weekend shall be scored in the show year ending April 30 of that year.

22.2.1.2 If May 1 is a Saturday in any given year, all shows on any day in that same weekend, including shows held on Friday, shall be scored in the show year beginning May 1 of that year.

29.3.4 In non-isolated areas a judge may not judge more than two Alternative Format shows on the same weekend, except in cases of emergency whereby a contracted judge has canceled and a new (i.e. different) judge cannot be contracted. (See 22.3.)

Associated Standing Rules:

202.2 Maximum number of times any single cat may be judged on any show weekend is twenty, regardless of format

40 202.2.1 One-Day Alternative Format shows may have up to five rings in the morning and five in the afternoon for a weekend maximum total of 10 rings including Congresses. A 1-day alternative format show with more than 8 rings may not be combined with any other format.

202.2.2 Two-Day Alternative Format shows may have up to four rings in the morning and four rings in the afternoon for a daily total of eight rings and a weekend total of sixteen rings including Congresses.

202.2.3 At Back-to-Back Shows or Split Format Shows any single cat may be judged not more than eight times per day, including any Congresses.

202.2.4 A club may choose to have different formats for each day of a show. (For example, a club may opt to have a one-day Alternative format show on Saturday with four rings in the morning and four rings in the afternoon and a one-dy show on Sunday with five rings.) The show format(s) must be clearly advertised in all promotional material.

202.3 The maximum number of times that a judge may judge a cat any single cat show weekend is s follows:

202.3.1 Two times in 1 day.

202.3.2 Three times in 2 days.

202.3.3 Four times in 3 days.

Judging Program:

44.2.2 During the training period, the trainee may:

44.2.2.1 Show a cat only through the use of an agent until all training sessions for the weekend are complete.

44.2.2.2 Write breed critiques and breed comparisons in the benching area of the show hall, NOT in proximity to the judging rings.

44.2.2.3 Be in the show hall prior to training or doing solos, but may not be in proximity to the judging rings EXCEPT during the training/solo sessions.

44.2.2.4 Have NO access to the show catalog until all training is complete for the weekend.

44.3.2.2 Training sessions are limited to two training sessions per show weekend, except when training overseas. When training overseas, three training sessions are allowed per show weekend. A "show weekend" is defined as 1-day, 2-day or 3-day shows. Only one training session is permitted per day, except when training overseas. When training overseas up to two training sessions per day are permitted not to exceed three sessions per weekend.

41

410.1.5 A judge may serve as a Guest Judge no more than two weekends per TICA show season except as stated in 410.1.6.1.

410.1.6 There shall be no more than two Guest Judges per show weekend or 50 percent of the rings whichever is less except as stated in 49.1.6.1.

417.9 A judge may judge a show 1-day in one location, and judge a different show at a different location on a subsequent day of the same weekend only if:

417.9.1 Both clubs agree in writing to this arrangement;

417.9.2 The judge can make travel arrangements that do not require him/her to leave the show hall during the advertised hours; and

417.9.3 Neither club is required to pay more than the lowest available round-trip air fare from the judge's home.

Judge Training Manual:

Training Sessions are limited to two training sessions per show weekend, except when training overseas. When training overseas, three training sessions are allowed per show weekend. A “show weekend” is defined as 1-day, 2-day or 3-day shows. Only one training session is permitted day, except when training overseas. When training overseas up to two training sessions per day are permitted not to exceed three sessions per weekend.

Page 60: Since these reports pertain to cats being shown the day of the show and it is time consuming for trainees to find the cats and owners, you might help out your trainee by letting the exhibitors know that a breed comparison has been assigned and the trainee will be looking for those cats later that day or weekend.

42 Good Afternoon,

I, Jesse Rafael Machuca, am requesting to be appointed to the Turkish Angora Breed Committee.

Attached is my letter requesting appointment, and I have reached out to my regional director, Kristine Alessio.

Please charge the $10 fee to the my accoun.

The billing address is 7834 Cypress AVE, Fontana, CA 92336.

Thank you.

Jesse Rafael Machuca

43 Good Evening,

I would like to request to be appointed to the TICA Turkish Angora breed Committee. Attached is my application for appointment, I am paid for my membership until 05/01/2015. Please consider my application and should I be missing anything, please notify me. Thank you‐ Julio Vega.

Please charge the $10 fee to my card

Julio Vega

Membership date is 6/1/2012

Doesn’t have a cattery

44 October 27, 2013

Dear Rules and Genetics Committee Members and TICA Board Members,

The Burmese/Bombay Breed Committee submits the following for your consideration:

PROPOSAL REQUEST

Allow the Burmese and Bombay breeds to introduce Permissible Outcrosses to our breeding programs.

RATIONALE

The TICA Burmese and Bombay Breed Section members are extremely concerned about the extremely low genetic diversity of both breeds, which has lead to increased health issues and reduced numbers. Data published in the journal Genomics in January 2008 demonstrated that Burmese, along with Singapuras and Sokokes, have the lowest genetic diversity of all cat breeds (Appendix A). Although Bombays were not included in this study, because of its smaller breeding population and dependence on Burmese for outcrosses, the Bombay breed is highly likely to have low genetic diversity as well.

Since the 2008 study, additional research has been conducted, which will be published in an upcoming paper by U.C. Davis’s (now with the University of Missouri) researcher Dr. Leslie A. Lyons and colleagues. The paper includes the following warning about the Burmese breed:

“ . . . Burmese (have) one of the highest levels of inbreeding and lowest levels of genetic variation. Burmese were established in the post-World War II breed bloom, and has been a moderately popular breed. However, concerns for two diseases, a craniofacial defect and hypokalemia, has limited migration of cats between countries and within the USA, and fractionation of the breeding pool by color preferences within the USA has also caused poor breeding dynamics. Thus, a reduction in observed heterozygosity due to the Wahlund-effect may be likely, resulting in an under-estimation of the already severely high inbreeding coefficients, which may be sending the Burmese into extinction. A breed management plan that balances diversity, health and breed type may need to be implemented to help the Burmese breed survive.” (Appendix B.)

To give you an idea of how severe the problem is, the following are the number of Burmese and Bombays that have been registered in TICA since its inception in 1979, compared to TICA’s three most popular breeds (Bengal, Maine Coon and Ragdoll) and total registrations. (Note: the Bengal was accepted as Registraion Only in 1983, advanced to New Breed status in 1986 and the advanced to Championship status in 1991, yet it is TICA’s most popular breed and, along with the Maine Coon and Ragdoll, one of the healthiest breeds. This is due to the outcrossings involved in creating the breeds. Appendix A.) The following figures are from the TICA Executive Office as of 10/24/13. They are not representative of the entire Bombay and Bombay gene pools available throughout the world, but they do show how small a gene pool there is compared to other breeds.

45 In addition, a recent health survey of Burmese breeders reviewed by Dr. Leslie Lyons and Dr. Susan Little, and reported to the CFA Burmese Breed Council in June 2010, shows a number of health problems affecting the breed. Low birth weight and stillborns reported by breeders are symptomatic of how inbreeding depression affects fertility. Other heritable diseases of concern for Burmese and Bombays, besides hypokalemia and the craniofacial defect (Appendix C), include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and an increased incidence of the dry form of feline infectious peritonitis. (Appendix D.)

We believe that another outcross options are needed to strengthen the Burmese and Bombay breeds. After the 2008 genetic diversity study was released, Leslie Lyons recommended a plan of action for the breed at the 2008 CFA Burmese Breed Council annual meeting. That plan included actively sharing bloodlines (which is hampered by the separate gene pools), breeding to cats in other registries (some of which is already occurring on a small scale, however TICA and CFA traditional Burmese share many common breeding lines), outcrossing to other breeds (such as Tonkinese), and bringing in imports from Southeast Asia. The indigenous domestic cats of Southeast Asia have been shown, through another recent study by Dr. Lyons and the National Institute of Health (N.I.H.), to be unique in comparison to the cats from the rest of the world. Though the “mother” of the Burmese breed in the west may have come from Burma, the Burmese breed actually originated as a natural breed in Thailand about 700 years ago, along with the Korat, KhaoManee, and WichienMaat (Siamese). These breeds are described in the Tamra Maew (“Cat Poems”) of Thailand. In the Cat Poems, the Burmese is known as the Thong Daeng (Copper Cat) or Suphalak. In addition, an all black cat known as the Ninlarat (black jewel) is described. The Ninlarat developed alongside and interbred with the other Thai breeds as they still do today. Randomly breeding cats as well as cattery cats in Thailand are genetically unique – they are the same Thai race. Moreover, contrary to what you might expect, only a few Thong Daeng/Suphalaks have been used as outcrosses for the Burmese in the West, and have not been directly used for Bombays. They constitute a large gene pool that is unrelated to Burmese and Bombays in the West for most of the past 100 years.

Based on Dr. Lyons’ recommendations, the Burmese/Bombay Breed Committee created polls for the Burmese and Bombay breed sections to receive their feedback on what outcrosses they would like to use in each breed. The polls were sent to the respective breed sections by the Executive Office and the following are the items with YES results: BURMESE ( http://www.tica.org/members/elections/election_bu.php )

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 2 46 1. The results of the poll sent to the Burmese and Bombay breed sections may indicate wide differences of opinions regarding outcrosses. If that is the case, would you agree to dissolving the Burmese Breed Group and having the Burmese and Bombays as separate breeds? If the separation were to happen, this would entail re- writing the standards for one or both breeds to show a substantial difference between the two of them. It could also require changing one or both breeds from Category I to a more appropriate category. It may also require the appointment of new committee members to one or both breeds. If necessary, I would agree that the Burmese Breed Group should be dissolved. YES 2. The European Burmese (EBU) was going to be proposed as a NEW breed at the 2012 TICA Annual. However, the EBU breeders withdrew their proposal. In the event the EBU breeders decide they would like to resubmit their proposal and the Board approves the EBU as a new breed, this would have an impact on the diversity of our gene pool. Since Burmese imported from outside the U.S. are currently registered as BUs, BO breeders have full access to them for our breeding programs. Future imports from outside the US would be registered as BUs or EBUs, depending upon their owner’s desires. The ones registered as EBU would NOT be a permissible outcross. Those wishing to breed to these EBUs would have to wait four generations to show any progeny from a BO to EBU breeding. Also of note, CFA currently recognizes the EBU as a separate breed. Approval of the EBU as an outcross would include the CFA registered EBUs. Therefore, please respond to the following:

The European Burmese should be a permissible allowable outcross for the Burmese IF it is accepted as a separate breed from the Burmese in the future. YES 3. The Tonkinese breed was developed using the Burmese breed. Therefore, it shares common characteristics in both type and origin. Allowing the Burmese breed to outcross to the Tonkinese will increase our ability to restore the health and vigor of the Burmese breed with little to no impact on type. NOTE: CFA has already approved the Tonkinese as a permissible outcross for Burmese. By permitting Tonkinese as outcrosses we would have access to a larger gene pool from TICA and CFA breeders, as well as other associations. CONS: None known. Advise the use of sepias over minks and pointeds; however, the use of minks and pointeds is not precluded

Allow Tonkinese to be a permissible outcross for the Burmese. YES 4. Breeds from Thailand: Thong Daeng/Suphalaks These breeds constitute a large, healthy, and diverse source of outcrosses. A Suphalak, Mod Daeng, has already been registered as a 01T Burmese and has had several litters. Indications are that these are healthy and hearty kittens.

CON: Initial loss of type. May take a few generations to regain the look to which we are accustomed. Allow Thong Daeng/Suphalaks to be permissible outcrosses for the Burmese. YES

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 3 47 BOMBAY ( http://www.tica.org/members/elections/election_bo.php )

1. The results of the poll sent to the Burmese and Bombay breed sections may indicate wide differences of opinions regarding outcrosses. If that is the case, would you agree to dissolving the Burmese Breed Group and having the Burmese and Bombays as separate breeds? If the separation were to happen, this would entail re- writing the standards for one or both breeds to show a substantial difference between the two of them. It could also require changing one or both breeds from Category I to a more appropriate category. It may also require the appointment of new committee members to one or both breeds. If necessary, I would agree that the Burmese Breed Group should be dissolved. YES 2. The European Burmese (EBU) was going to be proposed as a NEW breed at the 2012 TICA Annual. However, the EBU breeders withdrew their proposal. In the event the EBU breeders decide they would like to resubmit their proposal and the Board approves the EBU as a new breed, this would have an impact on the diversity of our gene pool. Since Burmese imported from outside the U.S. are currently registered as BUs, BO breeders have full access to them for our breeding programs. Future imports from outside the US would be registered as BUs or EBUs, depending upon their owner’s desires. The ones registered as EBU would NOT be a permissible outcross. Those wishing to breed to these EBUs would have to wait four generations to show any progeny from a BO to EBU breeding. Also of note, CFA currently recognizes the EBU as a separate breed. Approval of the EBU as an outcross would include the CFA registered EBUs. Therefore, please respond to the following:

The European Burmese should be a permissible allowable outcross for the Bombay IF it is accepted as a separate breed from the Burmese in the future. YES 3. The Tonkinese breed was developed using the Burmese breed. Therefore, it shares common characteristics in both type and origin with the Bombay. Allowing the Bombay breed to outcross to Tonkinese will increase our ability to restore the health and vigor of the Bombay breed with little to no impact on type. NOTE: CFA has already approved the Tonkinese as a permissible outcross for Burmese. By permitting Tonkinese as outcrosses we would have access to a larger gene pool from TICA and CFA breeders, as well as other associations. CONS: None known. Advise the use of sepias over minks and pointeds; however, the use of minks and pointeds is not precluded

Allow Tonkinese to be a permissible outcross for the Bombay. YES 4. Breeds from Thailand: Thong Daeng/Suphalaks (Burmese) and Ninlarat (black cats) These breeds constitute a large, healthy, and diverse source of outcrosses. A Suphalak, Mod Daeng, has already been registered as an 01T Burmese and has had several litters. Indications are that these are healthy and hearty kittens.

CON: Initial loss of type. May take a few generations to regain the look to which we are accustomed. Allow Thong Daeng/Suphalaks and Ninlarat to be permissible outcrosses for the Bombay. YES

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 4 48 PROPOSAL

Burmese and Bombays are currently in Category I. Category I “is for established breeds which are approaching the present goals as set by their standards. These breeds have a sufficiently large available gene pool within the breed that outcrosses to other breeds (other than within a breed group) for improvement of type, increased stamina, addition of new colors, etc., are largely unnecessary. Likewise, the likelihood of finding cats of unregistered parentage which would significantly improve the breed is minimal.” Clearly, based on the studies that have been done, neither the Burmese nor the Bombay has a “sufficiently large available gene pool within the breed…” Therefore, the Burmese/Bombay Breed Committee requests a special dispensation to allow the following breeds to be Permissible Outcrosses for both the Burmese and the Bombay, while remaining in Category I, due to the very low genetic diversity within the breeds.

 European Burmese (if split off from the Burmese)  Tonkinese  Indigenous domestic cats of Southeast Asian origin, such as the Thong Daeng/ Suphalak and Ninlarat (Bombay only), which were polled (wording slightly changed.)

Outcrossing to these breeds will give us the genetic diversity that we require. While some of them may take us a step back in type, the benefits to the gene pool far outweigh this possibility. We had email correspondence with Dr. Lyons on March 6, 2013 (Appendix E), and she concurred that these outcrosses would be beneficial and appropriate.

We realize that outcrosses to these breeds or any other breeds can be done at any time, but the progeny of such outcrosses cannot be shown until the 4th generation. In order to maintain a viable breeding program, breeders would have to maintain a relatively large number of cats. Given today’s anti-breeder atmosphere and the newly announced USDA/APHIS regulations, most breeders who want to improve the genetic diversity of the breeds will be reluctant to maintain such a large group of cats. By allowing the requested breeds to be Permissible Outcrosses, the progeny could be shown, if of show quality, which would encourage MORE breeders to work with outcrosses.

The permissible outcrosses will not be permanent, but will be removed when studies determine that the genetic diversity of both breeds has improved sufficiently that these breeds are no longer in danger.

Respectfully submitted,

Denise Hall, Burmese/Bombay Breed Committee Chair Vindouro Burmese & Bombays

Wendy Klamm, Burmese/Bombay Breed Committee Member Katsnklamms Bombays & Burmese

Helena Wiklundh, Burmese/Bombay Breed Committee Member TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 5 49 Securitazz Cattery

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 6 50 APPENDIX A

Genomics Volume 91, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages 12-21

The ascent of cat breeds: Genetic evaluations of breeds and worldwide random-bred populations

Monika J. Lipinskia, Lutz Froenickea, Kathleen C. Baysaca, Nicholas C. Billingsa, Christian M. Leuteneggerb, Alon M. Levyc, Maria Longerid, Tirri Niinie, Haydar Ozpinarf, Margaret R. Slaterg, Niels C. Pedersenb and Leslie A. Lyonsa,

a Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA, b Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA, c Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel, d Istituto di Zootecnica, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, e Oy Triniini Company, P.O. Box 36, FIN- 00501 Helsinki, Finland, f Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Yeditepe, 34755 Kayisdagi-Istanbul, Turkey, g Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4458, USA

Page 18:

“The Burmese and Singapura breeds have the lowest heterozygosity and the highest FIS of any breed, reflecting the most intense inbreeding (See Figure 4 on the next page). The newest CFA breed, the Siberian, had the highest variation, comparable to random-bred populations. This indicates that it was derived from a broad foundation stock. The Sphynx, which is a derivative of the Devon Rex breed, also had high genetic diversity. Given these results, Burmese and Singapura breeders should be concerned about genetic diversity, while Siberian breeders should be encouraged to retain existing diversity as their breed becomes more established. Similar to the conservation efforts in captive exotic felid populations, genetic analyses, breed histories, and population dynamics could be used to develop breed management or survival programs to maintain genetic variation within the breed gene pool for an extended period of time. “

The complete article “The ascent of cat breeds: Genetic evaluations of breeds and worldwide random-bred populations” can be found at the following link: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WG1-4R8KT3B- 3&_user=10&_coverDate=01%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_ori gin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersi on=0&_userid=10&md5=a59e5b29f36e29e86f23373b3236166b&searchtype=a

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 7 51 Figure 4 from “The ascent of cat breeds: Genetic evaluations of breeds and worldwide random-bred populations.”

Caption for the figure:

“Relative genetic health of domestic cat breeds.

“A variety of genetic markers and population statistics are used to measure a population’s genetic diversity. Short tandem repeat markers (STRs – microsatellites) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used to calculate the genetic variation of cat breeds, measured as heterozygosity and inbreeding Wright’s coefficients

(FIS). Presented are the heterozygosity values and inbreeding coefficients based on STRs for the breeds. Additional statistics were also calculated, including the SNP-based heterozygosity and inbreeding coefficients and the effective number of alleles for each type of genetic marker. The relative rank for each measure was determined for each breed and then averaged to determine an “overall genetic health”. The overall genetic health is represented from poor health on the left to good health on the right.”

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 8 52 APPENDIX B

From a scientific paper on feline genetic diversity to be published, the following extract was provided by Leslie A. Lyons in December 2010:

“The selected 29 breeds were expected to represent the major breeds of the cat fancy, from which, many other breeds have been derived. Significant genetic variation is present in many cat breeds. The Turkish Angora, a breed from the Eastern Mediterranean, which is likely the seat of cat domestication, had the highest effective number of alleles for both SNPs and STRs. A smooth continuum of increasing heterozygosity and decreasing inbreeding, whether SNP- or STR-based, is found between the least variable and most variable domesticated cat breeds. Two of the more popular breeds of the USA and the world are Persians and Bengals. Persians were one of the first breeds to be recognized and Bengals have been introduced in the past 40 years. Both breeds had moderate levels of heterozygosity and inbreeding. Several unpopular breeds, such as Chartreux and Cornish Rex, had fairly high levels of variation and low inbreeding. Thus, levels of variation and inbreeding cannot be predicted based on breed popularity and breed age, implying management by the cat breeders may be the most significant dynamic for breed genetic population health. Interesting, the Burmese had one of the highest levels of inbreeding and lowest levels of genetic variation. Burmese were established in the post-World War II breed bloom, and has been a moderately popular breed. However, concerns for two diseases, a craniofacial defect and hypokalemia, has limited migration of cats between countries and within the USA, and fractionation of the breeding pool by color preferences within the USA has also caused poor breeding dynamics. Thus, a reduction in observed heterozygosity due to the Wahlund-effect may be likely, resulting in an under-estimation of the already severely high inbreeding coefficients, which may be sending the Burmese into extinction. A breed management plan that balances diversity, health and breed type may need to be implemented to help the Burmese breed survive.”

Leslie A. Lyons, PhD, Professor University of Missouri* Veterinary Medicine & Surgery E109 Vet Med Bldg Columbia, MO 65211 (573) 882-9777 Email: [email protected]

*Dr.Lyons moved from UC Davis to the University of Missouri in July, 2013.

Video of CFA/National Alliance of Burmese Breeders, Burmese BC Meeting 6-30-2012, where Dr. Leslie Lyons and Dr. Barbara Gandolfi discuss the discovery of the Burmese cranial-facial head defect gene and discusses the state of the Burmese.

Intro: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXo1PJX5fr4 Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quTAeZf_e-4 Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pbWr25eGEc Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXzNHuSzjck Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RD6fu2KBeso Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pHFGqz6N68 Part 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNK1aAZbK4w Part 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmTtzbjBw80

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 9 53 APPENDIX C

The Craniofacial Mutation – “Burmese Head Defect”

The most burdensome of the genetic diseases faced by the Burmese breed is the craniofacial mutation or “Burmese Head Defect.” Research has shown that an average 25% of offspring of carriers of this lethal gene are born without eyes, with two sets of whisker pads, and sometimes with exposed brains. Though often born alive, the deformities produced by this gene are not compatible with life and kittens must be humanely euthanized. In the surviving offspring of carriers, the craniofacial gene itself produces an identifiable “contemporary” phenotype that is expressed in a much rounder skull, shortened muzzle, and sometimes a brow ridge.

This craniofacial gene has created significant controversy in the Burmese breeding community, and has resulted in a separation of “contemporary” (HD+ or head defect carrier) and “traditional” (HD- or non-carrier) Burmese gene pools. The breeders in these two camps are bitterly opposed to working with each other. This is not just a difference of opinion about head and body type. Much of the controversy and polarization in the breed community derives from how and why the defect persists and how to eliminate it from the breed. Traditional breeders feel it is unethical to continue these carrier lines which produce deformed kittens, while contemporary breeders defend their right to continue to breed the “contemporary look” they prefer. Traditional breeders use careful pedigree management to avoid breeding carriers, though a few traditional lines have been discovered to have carrier cats behind them. A recessive mutation that causes a congenital craniofacial defect in Burmese cats has recently been discovered by the Lyons Feline Genetics Research Laboratory at UC Davis.The mutation affects function of a gene significant for facial development.

The Burmese head defect first began to appear in the late 1960s/early 1970s. Since that time it has not only continued to proliferate in the United States but has spread to many other countries, including France, Germany, Russia, and Japan. The defect has also spread to other breeds, including the American Shorthair and the Bombay. The Bombay breed is believed, at least in the United States, to be dominated by head defect carrier contemporary cats. Pedigree research and analysis of show season archives from both TICA and CFA indicate contemporary Burmese and Bombays continue to be shown in both registries, with CFA having a higher percentage of contemporaries shown than traditionals.

NOTE: UC Davis offers the DNA test for Burmese Head Defect to assist owners and breeders in identifying affected and carrier cats. The tests are done with DNA collected from buccal swabs thus avoiding invasive blood collection. Breeders can use these tests as a tool to avoid breeding carriers together which would produce 25% affected offspring.

Summary of current research and link to articles on the Burmese craniofacial mutation:

Website for the Healthy Bombay Alliance, a group of European Bombay breeders concerned about the craniofacial mutation in European Bombay lines: http://www.bombaycats.info/

Website for UC Davis Veterinary Genetics Laboratory http://www.vgl.ucdavis.edu/services/cat/CatGM2.php

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 10 54 APPENDIX D

Statement from Dr. Niels Pedersen on Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP) in Burmese

“FIP is a serious problem among young pure breed cats. Although FIP occurs in all breeds to some extent, there are several breeds, as well as bloodlines within breeds, that suffer disproportionately. The Burmese breed is one breed that we have identified as having a serious FIP problem, not only in the United States but in Europe. In Denmark, for example, we are seeing a significant incidence of FIP in Birmans and Burmese.

“We know from heritability studies in one breed that 50% of the incidence of FIP can be explained by genetic factors. Genetic factors appear to be involved because certain matings and certain bloodlines suffer much greater FIP losses than others. Therefore, we are currently working towards identifying these genetic factors with a goal of preventing a significant portion of FIP losses by proper mate selection. The Burmese breed is ideal for genetic studies because the registry is relatively small and individuals in the breed are quite inbred. These factors make such genetic susceptibility research easier to conduct.

“The recognition by some Burmese breeders that the breed is becoming highly inbred is noteworthy, and the movement to increase genetic diversity within the breed by introducing new bloodlines from cats native to Thailand is laudatory. Such introductions must also be carefully monitored to assure that they will have the desired effects.”

For additional information about feline infectious peritonitis in Burmese, please contact:

Niels C. Pedersen, DVM, PhD Professor Director - Center for Companion Animal Health Director - Veterinary Genetics Laboratory

Department of Medicine and Epidemiology 2108 Tupper Hall University of California One Shields Ave Davis, CA 95616

Phone: 530-752-1363 Fax: 530-752-0414

E-mail: [email protected]

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 11 55 APPENDIX E

Subject: RE: Breed Management Plan Received: 06-Mar-13 10:01:57 PM From: "Leslie A. Lyons" To: "'Hall, Denise'" ,"'Wiklundh, Helena'" Cc: ______

Howdy - answers worked in below. Let me know what you think.

Attached is the newest paper on breeds.

Best regards,

Leslie

4206 VetMed 3A Office: (530) 754-5546 Population Health & Reproduction (PHR) School of Veterinary Medicine (SVM) One Shields Avenue University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616

E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (530) 752-4278 Lab e-mail: [email protected] Lab: (530) 754-2287 (4-CATS) http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/Catgenetics/

-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 3:28 PM To: Lyons, Leslie Cc: Hall, Denise; Wiklundh, Helena Subject: Breed Management Plan

Dear Dr. Lyons,

I am aware that you are planning to move to the University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine in the very near future and this pending move…

(LL) Yes - moving in July has probably made your life even more chaotic than usual, but I'm wondering if the Burmese Breed Management Plan has been written up yet. It would be most helpful.

(LL) No - because I am having some problems getting the information on population size, number of active breeders, number of breeding cats....We need this information to do some simulations to make an effective plan!

The USA and Foreign Burmese still represent one of the most genetically depressed populations we have examined. So, we still are promoting a very active breed management plan - but getting cooperation has been hard.

We have also noticed that over 1200 cats have been tested for hypokalemia, so the non-USA breeders are being very pro-active with their testing. We are not seeing similar enthusiasm for testing in the USA for the head defect.

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 12 56 I am on the TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Committee and we are preparing a poll to submit to our membership for their input on possible outcrosses. The results will be submitted to the TICA Board. We're trying to think "outside the box" and have come up with the following to propose to the breed sections:

BURMESE permissible outcrosses: Tonkinese (CFA already approved) and Thong Daeng/Suphalaks.

(LL) I had to look up these breed names - but good!

Note: "European" Burmese are not included since TICA registers all Burmese imports from outside the U.S. as Burmese. Also, sepia-colored Bombays are registered and shown as Burmese variants.

(LL) Good for you guys!

BOMBAY permissible outcrosses: 1) Reinstate the American SH as it was used to create the Bombay (CFA still allows it as an outcross), 2) Cats from Thailand: Thong Daeng/Suphalaks and Ninlarat(?), 3) Mandalay (Australia & New Zealand)/Asian (England), 4) British SH, 5) European SH, and 6) Tonkinese.

(LL) Here you are now mixing western cats with eastern cats. ASH, BSH I suggest to stay out of the mix. These cats are being used to get the head type I would suppose - which is likely due to different genes than the rest of the Burmese head type. Not counting the head defect-associated type.

Needless to say, there are "cons" to using most of these breeds, but genetic testing for inherent diseases prior to introducing them into breeding programs will be recommended.

(LL) Exactly - genetic testing will alleviate most of your historical concerns with undesired colors and fur types.

Using the British SH will affect coat, but the Bombay in Australia and New Zealand was developed using them and the plush coat was bred out.

(LL) I would still keep away due to HCM and PKD. The head type looks similar - but likely due to different genes all together (new research we are working on).

Before proceeding any further, I would appreciate your input regarding the outcrosses we are considering proposing. Are we on the right track? Have we lost our minds? Also, if there is a Breed Management Plan available for the Burmese (and Bombay) we would GREATLY appreciate a copy of it.

(LL) Would love to write a plan - I need Burmese breeds in the USA to at least play as one team - I don't think I am making progress!

Best regards,

Wendy Klamm TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Committee TICA Approved Allbreed Judge Katsnklamms Bombays & Burmese

TICA Burmese/Bombay Breed Group Proposal, October 27, 2013 Page 13 57 BU/BO Application – Comments from Rules & Genetics

(CL) I think the proposal is in conflict with the registration rules. Category I is supposed to be for breeds with a sufficiently large available gene pool within the breed and outcrossing is not necessary. If the BO/BU group needs outcrossing they might considered to split the 2 breeds and move the BU to category II and the BO to category IV. I also think the propose of category II should be revised. At this point we have no longer natural breeds or very few. We might better talk about some geographical areas in the world with good representatives of a particular breed in term of quantity and genetic diversity. However this action doesn't solve the problem. Natural breeds can't be outcrosses to others breeds/breed group within the 3 generation pedigree. Cats of unknown ancestry are permitted for exhibition/registration (foundation) only if they can proof an acceptable origin for the particular breed. don't see BU breeders trying to use cats with unknown ancestry. They want to use pedigree cats to improve their limited genetic pool. I neither see a solution for the BO in category IV. The BO was developed crossing BU and black AS, but no one is longer using a AS ... I know in Australia they have used some black BS to develop the local version of the breed. However category IV doesn't allow unknown cats within the 3 generation pedigree, only cats from the paternal breed. Thisroposal is not addressing the current problem with registrations about American BU and European BU. BU/BO issue is only showing that we need to revue the purpose of the current categories. (TJ) In speaking to Wendy, they don't have a problem moving the cats to a different category. I think moving the breeds to different categories is a good thing right now until the rules can be addressed to change other things. (MW) I’m uncomfortable with the concept of a Cat I breed that has allowable outcrosses. I think it's a dangerous precedent to set. TICA might as well re-define the whole concept of breed categories - and I don't think that is sensible at this point in time. Could they not go to a less restrictive category with the intention that the breeds could eventually move back to Cat I if appropriate? That would allow them to show the early generations in Championship. For example, Burmese to Category II and Bombay to Category IV. As regards splitting the breed group into two separate breeds, there is no precedent for this and as far as I can tell no rules addressing the situation. My recommendation would be for the Board to vote on it, based upon the wishes of the breed section (which has been determined by the recent poll). As things stand, the BU/BO breed group is in clear contravention of Registration Rules 31.4.

In addition, the Board might consider if the SBP approach (used with moving Siamese into Thai) might help with widening the gene pool (e.g. sepia Bombay kittens could be moved across to Burmese).

(EC) Category II is not appropriate for the Bombay - they are a hybrid breed and if moved should be in cat IV. In CFA, they have approved just that with street cats imported from Thailand - I've had inquiries as to why the progeny of those cats that are "legal in CFA are not showable in TICA.

(AB) Look at Category 2 -- half the breeds in there don't follow the rules for the category. They simply have an asterisk noting the exception. The Burmese situation is very very different because of the head defect. Disease has given these cats a need outside Category 1 rules -- they could transfer to a different category but we do have the precedent in Category 2 of allowing an exception so we could follow that route -- although I think it should include a review date say every 5 years because at some point it should revert back to the rules of Category 1. (And by the way we should be doing that with the Category 2 breeds that are exceptions.)

58 (AB) As for splitting the BU/BO, I agree with that desire -- the 2 breeds do have structural differences when you read the standard. Other breed groups have the same structure but differ in color/pattern and/or hairlength. Just because we haven't done it before doesn't mean we shouldn't do it however we do need to consider it carefully and ensure we document carefully whatever decision is made and the basis for it because whatever we do here sets a precedent and potentially opens the door to other requests.

(PS) I do not think there is an option to add permissible outcrosses and stay in Category I. If they stay in Category I they can use the outcrosses they want realizing that they are nonpermissible, but this will be a moot point by the time they breed back to SBT. Alternatively, they can split the breed group with BU going to Category II and using ‘unknowns’ and BO going to Category IV and defining their permissible outcrosses/source breeds. With the second option they don’t have to breed back to SBT before they are allowed to show the progeny of the outcrosses.

(SA) I agree with Carlos

Genetics Committee Responses

(HR) Without getting into personal opinions about the samples taken for past studies,

59 RESPONSE TO THE RULES AND GENETICS COMMITTEES AND A NOTE TO THE BOARD FROM THE BURMESE/BOMBAY BREED COMMITTEE

First of all, we want to thank all of you for your responses to our proposal. You have pretty much echoed the concerns and confusion we have been experiencing about the best route to take, which is why it took so long for us to prepare the proposal. The reason we wrote it as we did was to try to maintain as much as possible of the integrity of the Groups and Categories that TICA has established. Many of you were not in TICA when the Groups were created, so if you don’t mind, I’ll give a brief history of when/ how they were formed and how they affected the BU and BO breeds.

Back when TICA was born, all the breeds were separate. In either 1983 or 1984, the Board decided to put “like” breeds together into groups. This worked well for the PE/HI/ES, SI/BA/OS/OL, etc. because they only differed by color and/or hair length. The BU and BO grouping was a different matter. The BO was structurally different from the BU, and BO breeders specifically wanted to maintain that difference. However, the wishes/ opinions of the members of the two breeds were not polled and we were notified after they had been grouped together. To be honest, we were all quite upset, especially the BO breeders when we were told we could no longer outcross to the AS, which was still being done at that time. This removed a very important part of our gene pool. The only temporary benefit that really came of the grouping was the fact that the sepia BOs could be registered and shown as AOV BU, which was later changed to SBV BU. This initially helped the BU with adding to their gene pool, but the gene pool is now stagnant.

Fast forward to 2002. The BU/BO Breed Committee, being already very concerned regarding the reduced gene pool, put forth a proposal to dissolve the breed group and to reinstate the AS as a permissible outcross for the BO. Both breed sections were polled. One hundred percent of the BU breeders were in favor of the split and all BO breeders, except seven in France, were also in favor. The Board elected to keep the Breed Group as it was. Matters have now become critical for BOTH breeds due to the craniofacial defect, hypokalemia, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and an increased incidence of the dry form of feline infectious peritonitis, all have which have had a negative impact on the genetic diversity of both breeds.

I honestly can’t remember when the Categories were created, but they made sense at the time and have worked well. However, there are issues that exist now that weren’t apparent, weren’t as serious or did not exist when they were developed. I know our proposal does not fit into what currently exists for Category I, but we wrote it this way to try to keep the Breed Group as per the Board’s wishes in 2002. The request for a special dispensation for permissible outcrosses would keep the Breed Group, thus still allowing the sepia BOs to be registered and shown as SBV BUs, as well as providing us with the ability to enhance our genetic diversity with previously unused outcrosses.

60 At this time, the splitting of the Breed Group is not really our desire, but it may be necessary if our proposal is not accepted as is. However, if the Breed Group is dissolved by putting BUs in Category II and BOs in Category IV, unless permission is given, sepia BOs could no longer be registered and shown as BUs, which would be detrimental to the BU breed. Additionally, while BUs could outcross to Unknowns, and by this I’m assuming that would include "cats of Thai origin" (wording Heather Roberts suggested) or “indigenous domestic cats of Southeast Asian origin” (our suggestion to reduce confusion with the Thai breed), BOs still could not breed to them and have the progeny shown prior to the 4th generation because Category IV does not allow Unknowns. (We do have a question…are or aren’t the progeny of “Foundation” BUs from Southeast Asia, such as Mod Daeng, showable? This is not clear to us.) By splitting the Breed Group, this would also not address the desire of both breeds to use TOs in their breeding programs. (If the TO is approved as a permissible outcross, we agree with Heather Roberts’ recommendation that the progeny of TO/BU breedings be required to be color tested so only cb/cb kittens are registered as BUs.)

Clearly, the way things stand right now with the Groups and Categories, there is no perfect solution to the BU/BO genetic diversity dilemma. Our hopes are that our proposal will be met with open minds and the realization that some flexibility will be very beneficial to both breeds, as well as other breeds in the future. Should the Board decide to accept our proposal, the BU/BO Breed Sections would be agreeable to as specific period of time, possibly 5 or 7 years, to accomplish the desired outcrosses, then close the books on them. If it is apparent that additional time for outcrossing is needed, then an extension could be requested.

The BU/BO Breed Committee appreciates your taking the time to read our response and taking our comments in further consideration for our proposal.

Best regards,

Denise Hall, Breed Committee Chair Wendy Klamm, Breed Committee Member Helena Wiklundh, Breed Committee Member

BU/BO ResponsePage 2

61

PROPOSAL TO AMEND STANDARDS CO •r- 0-C1-4- _1 "4"o. o_ ›'' 1 + 0 7, - .0 ,,, k-/ ID31,' 1 cr1 03 ..7.,-7,t._)0V 1 1j -c. co.--_,o-' a cces CO It co t›.._ -0 .1=1 4-- ..• E'->.-E ... Q,.-....c-o ...., c0 l .4 -Ca) +-, - 5 a a- 4-1 ....:00LN-..wco E E E 4-71to0 ,1,' 7, E 9 ›, oa_If, u -0,. 0. 1 0 Ac 0 im,c,,.cum, 4, ,,, - ID e 0 too 2 E 0 o o ,- 2.) Q 2 -o „ O. E c 0- coc.1 0.7 a),, 7 3 1- V1 )... 4 0 • aj >-C F2 ":— v W r' . - 1 ., ...,_c>,"ziIt i ! . 1 _ • 0 00 tf) 0 CCU . , • -9 E - O • _0 = Q . L'' ..... 0.,vc.. - in,_ _c co-.o 0 t:C E 4-•C'a.'"> E QJ ,_ ..,L.-,coal ,- o0 ,._ -o K 0 E , ,..) '- 2 E C >n (9>4.,-5' c,a)a.b..-.= , 0 0 c 0DCL) 0 ( 0 -•,-• w c 0 a J ,- L) trr vi1 as 1' ..15 0- : E.6''0` l I'8 - 1- -•-.-. -0Lo:.-,re, '... - 1 .Cp 0 .0 a-- •r% ••••.E 'C - . - 4- .-) I-)co . 4 4 a, 0cl i. i 0 a ago: 11 (1) 0,_, E E a.)>•,-° ,., ,_..,_ " >, to 0 " rt:1 a, ❑ 0 ..,pcs0)-.c 0 Iti.EL.C1, 0 8 i 7 f . -' , 1 . . 1 , co , • , •• .6 , CL.--, - TA,...., . '5 ..,-) .0 - -o '6a) JD 4 : • - 4. g ti ,12 a 0 0 E r u r_r °- :71:65 16 0 CL o on C c 0 0 0 9 5 v — -- _ 1 L5 ■ , `,..-.asc-11 9 • L''' g ' CI.a=r-, -C - 4in IV01) , l - -to,;' . ,90 .0 ... -„,, .... - -0122 ... L/ . ., 4-1 C f L ,_ 'E u a o E > -° d 4- Si0o 0 C- C 0 E , ,... t.. 0 aT.,12 ,-- 'Fa 113 110 E'r COD-,94000OLneti n9 On> 1:1 CI 0 0. 0 a ,,_ a) c, ,_ 41 ri 0 C 3) _ , , --J..,..c . L, o - • , 1 .,, 1- - >,733

.0 I-) l .0 - 4 t-t E - ,-- " ..- 13 .,5 -a, a - -o .... -0 0 ,-N., -o 8 0c- E C. c C a ■ Cy _ rcs E01.n t•A'•-'1:1C9gb•n O. -tn c o, a ❑ D -• - _, c .) 0 E4- >7rs "' ,A0 A, - -, -cu -0 -C .) 05 Iii ='. .... v . -0 - .E' .,, „ E E . 4- R- c f 11 cf: 0 c 0 o g 13 4.1 0 5 -c) c .2 c aco • 0 7 LI 0 C V Q. ..i ..--- t 3 ' 3 U --1 f,' co ) . , -.. -o " tt C . -4 'ZS tts 15 ' '''. = , c 0 -2 4= 1 E E • - E u , = L D I' al a, a9 c' c 0 Ln 0 c; /11-•-1712a. ,, _,

,

m , - •r- -a IA .a .._ co•.,_,v._ 3 -F Li..1 (i,L ..._ II =Lo -13 a CI- -CI cocio, - 7:, 0I ...., -D lo 4- ...., .-, „ ..- _C < o0.4_ --i..)- 4 E _,:,t„- E ,+--,ID u ,,,,, .. u. 8 -1-.._o1:1) = ° .../ a 0 a 0 o-c,7, a, o o c 0 o c EIP,341 c -0ga. c ce_. E E > 0 0 a C on ..c W KAC4- m r.n 0Q 0 o C ,f, 6 g_ E 0 0 0.. 0/ 0 ''',_. 411 X W Iliut w ro01,_ , ^ , c-, .''

o.o.,,, 1 , " = aE-CI0 0Oi• -c -.c 2 - .. t.- • - 4- ••._coac° -.9 /0, - -, ,- mr 0 F ,-) nsc..- ›, E 0 1 0 0 ,.0 a) .- a, Q on 4 0 '-'a 0 C 0 - 0 (13 9) t ■ lij „, f,o_c'0 ._ 717>,..,C 0 0 ,,, 0 C C ..° o a, c ff 0 , . 0 03 r, fli x-- .--a,0 -• , , 4 i. , _c,_, - °,... , 1 ..--. 7-C,,,,..... 4 u ..-.31C•= Ild•,- . - - cc -0 -c - .c 2 1D = '_ '47., CA Ln 4ct. .... _o ,-.,.. 4- 0 o -1 E - 7, U, On .1 0r„, ,I..,., ° C --•-,_ as Q CL1• • orou-a) o > (C c c 0 a' 0 CA fa .„_cu tu ti L ,.,. . ,...._, _c 93a _ „ ' _6 pc ,uc), 1 4 ..;LD . ' >., ..c s - - ela,o 7 c 7 N- .0 . - -o" z t_D• 4.- . i a- 4, ' 0 0 a) 1=L 5- -0 I ro 4- L L ,, . 10 Q1,1.0 u' ° r 0...g • 0 a) ri,o.w a) )c)4- a CU 2 5_ C C 7 x •,-.cL,II:1 T.) vt , - ''' 0e ,., 0 , .c.ra ' .0Z. , 1 VI , 0

, ''.C+-• wnvi '-'>," , ‘-:_..7, ■ . : 2— ", .c, co L.,' a..---- _ ..,- ti 61 0 . a) o CU 3 ..- u ''' A=V E — ...... 1- --' 11. Iv I o ,,, o go,-...; o oi.,.: cL i v -LC 1 2 7. ,

e CC. a ,.... 0v. - I." co 79 -. cq . , - - ›% .,... r in ,... .., 1- CL 0 : ,-, to 0 - r9 0•1 - co g qi 7 - - 0 112 , OJ ` ,, - ..C. is 27 - co '-' E E .- Mt ' ° 0 a as > cu 0) 0 6) WS ,_ o 1 0 .

' A

1 -0 --) (1 00 0 4.

..,_ -0 a . 11.9: a . -C %_ -5 4... ID ...., _c -,,, ,,_ r m L.' pc co - .4 - •W 13 4 0 ' 4- , rt3 a on 1 An I., ;2 4; 9) LI CD .1) -. 0- 7- ,- iii ,,,, „, ru LI 0 nl ,-. 1-1 11 ur 0 I = -...., a a _c a. o 8 0 o.,r ._ o .,._ C Cr -r-- O. s_ a o o. 4- C CI. III c co ...., V > 'a 0 0 a) - 0 • 41.1 a x ..-, 0, tv 2 O1 2 0- 3 , i 1 ' ir, , " ,-

.,_.,- , ,,... • - oz 7 '1 - E.9 .c „- _. "6 - I 2 IA .1 13 E 0 1 ,-- a - Q >-. a. Li L3 I° a a) Q- 8' On 'E co a , 0 a.1 -' , ■ ■ - 0

, ,

,

> 3

, 0

.

- : "15 L0 LA ' 0 g c t - 1,} r, n

ri r

-0 -c c 's .- r-4 ..1 ea , CD 7C ..... 0 c W ., " .,- 0317, - 1 E .-CP - ..a altil -0 ci0 - T.; 4- 0. N I; 0F., 1,1 ce0 ca _c "0 <'-' 5 s_ 7 -i -0 _17 _c i It; < -4- LA "0 E Q m''-0 os 4.3 C a2 2 C 4- a E iu !- V-- L U 'a 0. 11 0 ns 1... „,, E24,'..... C ° al co6 GU <...!, 2IL az s_ C 4- c c+3 0 (1) 044 c cn • 0 ^03 0 ,- 9.1 a -G0 0 13) 7 E T >>.a, VI L. ft3 ra -o,-,,.. LA il3 0 ._-co a, >..-, o o c .c0 o C V ❑ 0 1.1 %- 05Ceci `" 5 ,, rn-0 al.2 1..)rar 1 CV '0I- , Ce 4 - . _ „, --o LI wr.- .0 17.i 0-d 1 z -a 03 t.g.) am .1 ..... , ._ uj .1. C I, w le _i W .0 _c u . ti W L- ° .› 6 0. L.0 0 >,.. =7. c co --- W Ti vi 1'7' /9 L... ur (1) op :.. C QJ ❑ tt:s ...4 = / 1 ,... 3 - .E r "C:i - N

is : 0- -E , r-1 kJ 44 u 6/ C a) 1.1g 0 a, E. w °.' co r3 0_ a. a) o >, 0 0 1 e LI 11 FIJ 03 C ba el) C 0- ,, (L) 01 -0 s_ 0 E f - -* a . t, ..- ,

.0

I

. 15 - 4 E 0 OR co c ❑ 0) AR -

.._ , ;,..= . .1. E _co.

co +/-• 1;:5 _0 ',I oo 2 z v.., 4- ., 4-, E :,- 4 ...7.• t-• C .1: r... 0 C on (3 0 0 0. es 0 0 Q 1 E it ° ' C Z o Q, C o fr., C c c 0) 0 0 I... 0.1 .1=, 0 0 0 V to to 17 --J - , ss.

- c . al

,

..-• ■ .. „C 0 - -C r- '4 ..) Cu 0 E 4 4.• E cd OJ Oti 0 0 a._ 4.1 E Erl 10 - 11) Cu 0) 0 -

1

SIGNATURE: NI

STANDARDTO A MEND: —t- 0 • -c 'c _c - 0 Z on co co E fn .4 o. o co co O O O 0 O o_ cc 1 C a) 8 In C E to in •J ■

) . P < 0 0 o 0 L

F- rr 1.7 op 2 0 ,s, 8 2. op oo t 1- , CD L ,,, N. cd - 0' - 6 1 4 n1 , ON 0 (-D of; • , tn

, i

Q` i . ' , 62 Winter 2014 Breed Comments

TV Standard Change

(CB) Ms. Tadajewski is the TV breed chair of record, and the application appears to be in order. I agree that the current description in the TV standard does not seem appropriate. On looking at photos of the award winning TVs on the TICA website, I do wonder if “moderately large in proportion to the body” is any better. It appears to me that the ears should be described simply as “slightly large.” In fact, many of the cats seem to have medium size ears.

(BT) The request appears to be in order and while I agree the ears look large on kittens they grow into them as adults!

(MW) From a Rules perspective, the standard change application is made in accordance with TICA's rules.

(CL) The proposal to amend the TV breed standard seems to be in accordance with our rules and language. I agree the way it is worded now is a bit confusing. "Moderately large, in proportion with the body" is a better description for the TV's ear size. I prefer this wording than "Moderately large to large" or "Medium to large".

(EC) - the proposal is in order

(AB) Application is in order. Received more than 120 days ahead of Winter meeting and slated for that meeting.

63

THE INTERNATIONAL CAT ASSOCIATION, INC. NEW TRAIT ADVANCEMENT TO CHAMPIONSHIP Name of Breed: Scottish Straight and Scottish Straight Longhair

33.9.2 Requirements for Championship Status. A new trait or traits may apply for Championship Status upon completion of the following:

33.9.2.1 At least ten individual examples of the new trait or traits have been shown. List cat by name, registration number, and show.

1. Norell’s Give me Five - AOP 060111 011 October 2011 Grasse/October 2011 Toulouse/ November 2011 Orléans France / November 2011 St amand montrond France. 2. Scottish Hill's Galice Dyovan - BOP 092611 036 Oct 2012 Grasse France / Octo 2012 Toulouse France/ Nov 2012 Bourges France/ St Raphael France Mars 2013 3. Galifray des Glens - AOP 072611 037 November 2011St Amand montrond France/ November 2012 Bourges France 4. Norells Tom Hanks - BOP 052012 042 October 2012 Toulouse France / November 2012 Bourges France 5. Sladkiy Son Lovely Bear - COP 042511 087 October 2012 Toulouse France/ November 2012 Bourges France/ St Raphael France Mars 2013 6. The girl Mio mio - AOP 011312 021 October 2012 Grasse France / November 2012 Bourges France 7. Gstar de dicxiland - AOP 072111 035 February 2013 Toulouse France 8. Hebrides Frankie - COP 012110 035 Compradres Cat Club Show June 29th & 30th, 2013 in Rosenberg, TX 77471 9. FurElyse Sadie Rose - SBV 101012 039 Enchanted Cat Club 05/11-05/12/13 Albquerque, NM 10. Macrory Harmonia - COP 040712 003 Estonie/phillipines 11. Rumfold Diamond Head Bennevis - SBV 081612 039 St Raphael France Mars 2013 12. Gstar de dicxiland - AOP 072111 035 February 2013 Toulouse France 13. Gypsy de dicxiland - AOP 061311 082 February 2013 Toulouse France 14. OWHL BUSTIFORD RUM TUM TUGGE - SBT 121212 028 Livonia, Michigan,USA April 26-28, 2013 15. Princess - A3P 0 32112 062 Belgrade Serbia March 9-10 2013 16. Muse Thumbelina - BOP 022013 033 – August 3-4, 2013 Evangeline Country CF – Houston, TX

33.9.2.2 At least ten TICA members in good standing actively breeding and/or exhibiting the new trait or traits in the New Traits Class.

List member, region, and membership number.

I would note that all Scottish Fold breeders are breeding Straight-eared Scottish Folds 1. Cheryl Hogan SC R-0406-SC 2. Grace Guidry SC 1018006 3. Pat Hall SC 1092660 4. Gabrielle CASTELJON ES 1122654 5. Paris, Trinley-patricia ES 1109625 6. Serge ATLAN ES 1138015 7. Nina MESSORI ES 1119331 8. Sally Patch GL 9. Karin ROTH EN 1102854 10. Francis Bonnevie AR 1138338 11. Nadejda Rumyantseva (Rumfold Russia) EN 12. Elyse Ramsey SC R-3049 13. Stephanie Smith 14. Pamela Mercier SC 1089023

33.9.2.3 A minimum number of cats expressing the new trait or traits have been registered in the 3 years prior to application as follows: 33.9.2.3.1 Ten cats in breeds registering fewer than 100 cats OR 33.9.2.3.2 Ten percent of the cats registered, not to exceed 50 cats, for those breeds registering 100 or more cats.

P: 956.428.8046 P.O. BOX 2684, HARLINGEN TX 78551 [email protected] F: 956.428.8047 WWW.TICA.ORG64 REVISED: 1/9/2012

THE INTERNATIONAL CAT ASSOCIATION, INC. NEW TRAIT ADVANCEMENT TO CHAMPIONSHIP

List cats by name and registration number. Because ~50% of the Scottish Folds born are straight eared but registered as Scottish Folds it stands to reason there are many hundreds of these cats registered but not identifiable as such. We have listed just a few. All those listed here were registered in the last 3 years, after October 2010. 1. Norell’s Give me Five 2. Galifray des Glens AOP 060111 011 AOP 072611 037 3. Scottish Hill's Galice Dyovan 4. Sladkiy Son Lovely Bear BOP 092611 036 COP 042511 087 5. Norells Tom Hanks 6. FurElyse Sadie Rose BOP 052012 042 SBV 101012 039 7. Snobugs Apollo Over The Moon 8. Snobugs Apple Saucy AOP 101512 013 AOP 101512 014 9. FurElyse Derry Doppelganger 10. The Girl Mio Mio SBV 040711 047 AOP 011312 021 11. Gstar de dicxiland 12. Gypsy de dicxiland AOP 072111 035 AOP 061311 082 13. Rumfold Diamond Head Bennevis 14. Hera des Huit chemins SBV 081612 039 SBV 062412 031 15. Macrory Harmonia 16. Macrory Endymion COP 040712 003 BOP 081611 0324 17. Geliocats Velor of Macrory 18. Macrory Bam Bam BOP 030311 049 COP 111510 005 19. Muse Merci Beaucoup 20. Macrory Gaia BON 072213 004 SBV 021912 003 21. OWHL Bustiford Rum Tum Tugger 22. Coupari Chances Are of Doux Coeurs SBT 121212 028 BOP 092612 048 23. Princess 24. Muse Phoebe A3P 0 32112 062 AON 062510 071 (registered in 2013) 25. Scottish' Hill's Hecat Anassa 26. Holly des Doux Coeurs COP 061812 049 BOP 101112 048 27. Harry de Valfleury 28. Hebrides Frankie BOP 040712 049 COP 023210 035 29. Holmes Sherlock The Chessy Cat 30. Lukor Fold kaysar of Chasheba BOP 072012 057 COP 021313 036 31. Lukor Fold Nina of Chasheba 32. Muse Baby Bear COP 042613 010 BOP 082213 003 33. Muse Pillow Talk 34. FurElyse Jasper BON 72213 008 SBV 101012 040 35. FurElyse Sassafras 36. FurElyse Doofus of Owhl SBV 082007 079 (Registered in April of 2012) SBV 071810 063 (Registered in 2012) 37. Muse Heartthrob Lover 38. Holyfold Give me S'mores BON 072213 006 SBV 041310 074 39. Muse Love is in the Air 40. MUSE THUMBELINA BON 072213 007 BOP 022013 033 41. Muse Miss Molly 42. Muse Russ BON 072213 005 BON 042811 072 43. Tzarkhan Captain N The Kid of Muse 44. Muse William Wallace BOP 071612 073 AOP 073111043 45. Muse Hollywood 46. OWHL Matilda AOP 071813 003 COP 042212 025 47. OWHL Orange Sherbert 48. OWHL Willow BOP 041312 033 AOP 062212 010 49. OWHL Pixiedust 50. OWHL Butterball COP 080711 035 COP 041711 052

P: 956.428.8046 P.O. BOX 2684, HARLINGEN TX 78551 [email protected] F: 956.428.8047 WWW.TICA.ORG65 REVISED: 1/9/2012

THE INTERNATIONAL CAT ASSOCIATION, INC. NEW TRAIT ADVANCEMENT TO CHAMPIONSHIP

33.9.2.4.Submission of an electronic Application for Advancement to Championship to each member of the Breed Committee, (and if part of a Breed Group, to each member of each Breed Committee in the Breed Group), each member of the Genetics and Rules Committees, at least 120 days before the applicable Board meeting. The application must be signed by at least ten TICA members in good standing. Emailed to members: _9/20/13 (see attached emails for these 10 people’s electronic signatures.) Emailed to Breed Committee, Genetics and Rules Committee: 9/21/13

33.9.2.3.3 any required standard changes must be included in the application. See attached.

33.9.2.4.1 A processing fee of $50 Paid on 9/17/13

33.9.2.7 A Notice of Intent to Apply for Advancement to Championship Status must be published in the TICA TREND at least 120 days prior to the meeting at which the application for advancement will be heard, and which invites comments about the breed to be forwarded to the Executive Office. Date submitted for publication in the TREND: I submitted this request to the last TREND editor in August of 2013 but her contract had expired. I have now submitted it to the new TREND Editor, Judity Milling on 9/21/13, shortly after she had a signed contract for the position. She tells me the next issue should be mailed out November 1, 2013.

FOR INFORMATION ONLY: 33.9.2.5 Following approval of the Genetics and Rules Committee, and at least 90 days prior to the applicable Board Meeting, the approved application shall be submitted by the Breed Committee Chair to the Executive Office for polling of the Breed Sections. The application shall include comments of the Genetics Committee on the genetic validity of the new trait or traits and any comments of the Rules Committee. 33.9.2.6 Upon receipt of the application marked as approved, the Executive Office shall issue a poll to all members of the related Breed Section(s). Polls must be returned to the TICA Ballot Judge no later than 30 days from the date of issue. In cases of a Breed Group, a majority of the Breed Section members voting in EACH of the Breed Groups, must vote to approve the new trait or traits in order to advance to championship status. The results of the poll shall be included in the meeting agenda with the application. 33.9.2.6.1 The expense of any poll shall be the financial responsibility of the individuals requesting the poll. 33.9.3 Meeting the requirements set forth in these rules does not guarantee advancement. The Board of Directors shall judge each request for advancement on a case by case basis.

Signed (electronically): Please see the attachment with all these signatures via email for this application. 1)___Cheryl W. Hogan, SF/SFL Breed Chair__ 2)__Catherine Bellec______3)__Lisa Jones______4)__Sally Patch______5)__Gabrielle Montorio______6)__Pat Hall______7)__Pamela Mercier______8)__Elyse Ramsey______9)__Grace Guidry______10)_Nina Messor______11)_DeLynne Satimore______

P: 956.428.8046 P.O. BOX 2684, HARLINGEN TX 78551 [email protected] F: 956.428.8047 WWW.TICA.ORG66 REVISED: 1/9/2012

Proposed changes for Scottish Straight/Scottish Straight LH in red below:

SCOTTISH FOLD BREED GROUP (SF/SFL/SS/SSL) (abbreviations only suggested) COAT/COLOR/PATTERN: The Scottish cats are best known for the Scottish Fold (SF) w i t h is best known for its distinctive ears and large, round eyes, Length: which give it a sweet, open expression. The Scottish Fold Longhair (SFL) is the longhaired version of this breed. The Scottish (SF/SS) Should be short, double coat preferred. Should not lie flat to the body. Straight (SS) is the straight eared version of the Scottish Fold. The Scottish Straight Longhair (SSL) is the straight eared, long haired version of this breed. (SFL/SSL) Semi-long. Toe tufts and ear furnishings should be clearly visible. Ruff and britches desirable. Texture: HEAD ...... 40 points (SF/SS) Should be plush, dense and resilient. Shape ...... 10 (SFL/SSL): Should be soft and stand away from the body. Ears ...... 15 Pattern: All patterns. Eyes ...... 5 Color: All traditional and pointed colors accepted. Chin ...... 1 Muzzle ...... 3 OTHER: Nose ...... 3 Balance: Body should be medium and well-balanced and well-proportioned. Profile ...... 3 Condition: Cat must exhibit a healthy condition. BODY ...... 40 points Temperament: Unchallenging. The Scottish Fold is a sweet-tempered, affectionate cat and enjoys being with people. Torso ...... 5 Legs ...... 4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Scottish Fold occurred as a spontaneous mutation in farm cats in Scotland. All bona-fide Feet ...... 3 Scottish Folds trace their pedigree to Susie, the first fold-ear cat discovered by the founders of the breed, William and Mary Ross. Tail ...... 20 The Breed was subsequently established by outcrosses to both pedigreed breeds and domestic cats in the United States. One Boning ...... 3 word can describe the Scottish Fold and that is ROUND in every sense of the word. Round head, body, eyes, and feet. The Musculature ...... 5 Scottish Fold is best known for its distinctive ears and large, round eyes, which give it a sweet, open expression. They retain a COAT/COLOR/PATTERN ...... 15 points "kittenish" expression their entire life. The shorthair is medium in size with a plush, dense coat. The longhair has the same Length ...... 4 standard as the Shorthair Fold/Straight with the exception of the coat, which is semi-long and stands away from the body. Texture ...... 5 However, the longhair gives the breed a somewhat softer overall look. The Scottish Straight is identical with that same sweet Pattern ...... 3 open expression but with straight ears. Color ...... 3 OTHER ...... 5 points ALLOWANCES: Seasonal changes in coat length and texture for the longhair fold. Lockets. Balance ...... 2 Condition ...... 2 PENALIZE: A heavy brow ridge is to be penalized as it closes down the face, making the cat look as if it is scowling or frowning Temperament ...... 1 and detracts from the sweet, open expression. The forehead should be smooth. A definite nose break is considered a fault. Any hint of lack of mobility in the cat due to short course legs. CATEGORIES: Traditional and Pointed. WITHHOLD ALL AWARDS (WW): Evidence of illness, poor health, emaciation. DIVISIONS: All. DISQUALIFY (DQ): Kinked tail. Tail lacking in flexibility. Temperament must be unchallenging; any sign of definite challenge shall disqualify. The cat may exhibit fear, seek to flee, or generally complain aloud but may COLORS: All. not threaten to harm. In accordance with Show Rules, ARTICLE SIXTEEN, the following shall be considered mandatory disqualifications: a cat that bites (216.9), a cat showing evidence of intent to deceive (216.10), adult whole male cats not having two descended testicles (216.11), cats with all or part of the tail missing , except as authorized by a Board approved standard (216.12.1), cats with more than five toes on each front foot and four toes on each back PERMISSIBLE OUTCROSSES: American Shorthair, British Shorthair, British Longhair, foot, unless proved the result of an injury or as authorized by a Board approved standard (216.12.2), visible or invisible tail faults if Board approved standard requires disqualification (216.12.4), crossed eyes if Board approved standard requires disqualification (216.12.5), total blindness (216.12.6), markedly HEAD: smaller size, not in keeping with the breed (216.12.9), and depression of the sternum or unusually small diameter of the rib cage itself (216.12.11.1). See Show Shape: Well rounded. Prominent cheeks with a jowly appearance. Overall look should have a sweet, open expression. Rules, ARTICLE SIXTEEN for more comprehensive rules governing penalties and disqualifications.

Should be round from any angle. Ears: (Folded) Folded forward and downward. Small, tightly folded ear preferred. The ears should be set in a cap-like fashion to expose a rounded cranium, not set high on the head. Size of ear is not as important as ear set and fold. Ear tips to be rounded.

Ears : (Straight) Size is medium to small with rounded tips. The set is the same wide set to show a rounded top head.

Eyes: Wide open, large and round with sweet expression. Eye color to conform to coat color.

Chin: Should be moderate. Muzzle: Moderate wide muzzle to have well-rounded whisker pads.

Nose: Broad and short. Profile: Gentle curve, brief stop is permitted. Neck: Head should blend into a short neck.

BODY:

Torso: Body should be medium and well rounded. Should be even from shoulder to pelvic girdle. Legs: Length in proportion to body. Cat should stand firmly and show no signs of weakness or lack of mobility in the hindquarters. Feet: Toes to be neat and well-rounded. . Tail: Must show normal flexibility and be in proportion to the body.

Boning: Medium boning. Musculature: The Scottish Fold should have a firm, muscular body, no sign of softness or flabbiness should be present.

05/01/04 Scottish Fold Breed Group Standard, 05/01/04

05/01/04 Scottish Fold Breed Group Standard, 05/01/04

67 Scottish Straight Comments from Rules & Genetics

Rules –

(BT) I believe this application is now in order according to the Rules. The straight ears have been used for breeding in this breed from the beginning of the breed and they are Championship in several International Organizations. To make them a breed group and allow the straights to be shown is the wish of the breed section….I see no reason not to allow it.

(EC) mine is the same as Bobbie's ‐

(TJ) Everything looks to be in order. I think I would move the points on balance and condition to some other place since this is already addressed in Article 16, but it is the sections choice ultimately.

(CL) I think this new proposal is really much better than original. From the rules point of view this is correct. Still not sure about the point of having the Scottish straights in championship class. The Scottish straights are supposed to be at breeding programs in order to help producing healthy cats, however the feature of the breed is the folded ears and we should keep this, but I think this is up to the breeders first and secondly up to the board. Our work is done.

(AB) I agree with Carlos.

(MW) From a Rules perspective, the application appears to be in order. I am assuming that the EO can verify the details of the cats with registration numbers listed in the application.

(PS) I agree, it all looks in proper order.

Genetics

(HR) I am perfectly fine with the application of this new trait, as long as the breed section votes positively for it. I also agree with Ellen regarding her comments on point distribution.

(AK) I am in favor of this switch. I think it will increase the visibility and ability evaluate the REAL working population for the SF. Truly they already are an operational breed group.

68 Attached please find two versions of the Highlander standard with proposed revisions. The purpose of the majority of these changes is to tighten up or clarify the standard, or to improve the grammar and wording of the document making it easier to interpret. The only difference between the two versions is that one includes polydactyl feet under allowances, the other lists polydactyl feet under disqualifications. The TICA board of directors are requested to consider adding polydactyl feet as a separate issue from all other standard revisions, so two separate versions have been submitted for you to choose between. The members of the Highlander breed group respectfully request that the TICA board of directors include polydactyl feet in our standard. Since before Highlanders were admitted into TICA as a breed, their predecessors the Highland Lynx had polydactyl feet, and to this day many breeders continue to breed the polydactyl gene into their litters. We realize that there are rarely adverse incidents such as twisty limbs because of the polydactyl gene, but also recognize that with conscientious and fastidious breeding the majority of these issues can be avoided. Before deciding to present this request to the TICA board members a poll was run of the Highlander breed group membership to see how many were in favor of adding polydactyl feet to the standard. Out of 25 Highlander breed group members 14 voted, and of those 12 voted in favor of adding polydactyl feet and 2 voted against the proposal. We therefore ask that the board members seriously consider our request to include polydactyl feet in our standard. Because the polydactyl gene is such a common occurrence in Highlanders, if the board members choose not to allow this gene in the Highlander breed, we request that it be listed as a disqualification in the Highlander standard. We recommend this because, even though polydactyly is an automatic disqualification according to show rule 216.12.2, we believe that it is important to emphasize it in our standard so that there is no room for doubt as to TICA’s stance on polydactyly for those who wish to continue to breed polydactyl Highlander cats. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.

Robin Lively Working Breed Chair Highlander Breed Group

69 HIGHLANDER BREED GROUP (HG/HGS) The Highlander Shorthair (HGS) and Highlander Longhair (HG) are is a medium to large shorthair domestic muscular and athletic appearing cats. Distinguishing features are its sloping the straight to slightly convex forehead, wide nose bridge, blunt profile, and the loose relaxed curl to its wide based ears. The Highlander Longhair (HG) is the long hair version.

HEAD ...... 40 points BODY: Shape ...... 6 Torso: Medium to large in size with noticeable depth. Ears ...... 10 Rectangular in shape. Straight back with hips higher Eyes ...... 5 than shoulders. Overall muscled, athletic appearance. Chin ...... 6 Males are proportionally larger than females. Muzzle ...... 6 Legs: Medium in length, back legs longer than front. Nose ...... 4 Feet: Medium to large, rounded with large knuckles. Profile ...... 3 Longhair must have toe tufts. Longhair (HD) must BODY ...... 40 points have toe tufts. Torso ...... 10 Tail: Short and thick. Bone length must be a minimum Tail ...... 10 of one inch in adults with proportional length in Boning ...... 8 kittens. Should not extend past the hock. Kinks and Musculature ...... 7 curls are allowed. Legs/Feet ...... 5 Boning: Moderately heavy and substantial. COAT/COLOR/PATTERN 20 points Musculature: Well-muscled. Length ...... 6 Texture ...... 6 COAT/COLOR/PATTERN: Pattern ...... 4 Length: (HGS) Short, dense and resilient. Color ...... 4 Length: (HG) Longhair up to 2½ inches with shaggy belly hair, that is longer than the rest of the coat. CATEGORY: All. Texture: There will be texture variations depending DIVISION: Solid, Tortie, Tabby, Silver/Smoke upon the color and coat length of the cat. COLORS: All. (HGS) Resilient, snapping back into place. (HG) Soft. PERMISSIBLE OUTCROSSES: Pattern: Domestic longhair/shorthair, not a member of a Tabby: All tabby patterns are allowed recognized breed. Pointed: Expression of the underlying tabby pattern is desirable. HEAD: Shape: Wide, inverted pear shaped head with OTHER: substantial width to the muzzle. Balance: All parts of the body in proportion. Eyes: Medium to large sized, set far apart. Set on a Condition: Should reflect excellent health, good slight bias. Slightly flattened or hooded oval in shape. muscle tone. Eye color is independent of coat color except in the Temperament: Must be unchallenging. pointed and mink category. Ears: Medium to large, wide at the base, set as much GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Highlander is a on the top of the head as on the side, as erect as muscular, athletic domestic cat. Selective breeding possible. Ears must be firm at the base, flexible at the has contributed to protecting the unique features and tips. Loose relaxed curl of no more than 90º, allowing enhancing the bloodlines. Highlander cats come in the tips of the ears to be visible in a frontal view. No both shorthair and longhair. Physical characteristics preference given to the direction the ear tips point in. include a sloping straight to slightly convex forehead Ear furnishings and ear tufts are desired but not and wide nose, with the nose and muzzle forming a required. Kittens may have a greater degree of curl blunt look in profile. The curled ear is seen in profile but not more than 90º by adulthood. as a loose, relaxed curl. The ears are wide-based, Muzzle: Full, wide, strong with a definite break. open and stand tall. Prominent whisker pads should make the muzzle appear squared. Muzzle length makes head appear LOCKETS: Withhold all awards longer than wide. Chin: Strong and deep. Must align with the top of the ALLOWANCES: Tarnishing in silvers. Polydactyl feet. jaw. PENALIZE: Ears that are not open or wide based, Profile: Rounded back skull, sloping straight to slightly ears too small or low set. Tail too long. Excessive dip convex forehead, with a change of direction at the eye in the nose. ridge, may have a slight concave curve to the nose. Nose, muzzle and chin form a blunt look in profile. DISQUALIFY: Ears not erect. Tail too short or Nose: Wide with substantial nose leather. docked.

70 HIGHLANDER BREED GROUP (HG/HGS) The Highlander Shorthair (HGS) and Highlander Longhair (HG) are medium to large muscular and athletic appearing cats. Distinguishing features are the straight to slightly convex forehead, wide nose bridge, blunt profile, and the loose relaxed curl to its wide based ears.

HEAD ...... 40 points muzzle and chin form a blunt look in profile. Shape ...... 6 Nose: Wide with substantial nose leather. Ears ...... 10 Eyes ...... 5 BODY: Chin ...... 6 Torso: Medium to large in size with noticeable depth. Muzzle ...... 6 Rectangular in shape. Straight back with hips higher Nose ...... 4 than shoulders. Overall muscled, athletic appearance. Profile ...... 3 Males are proportionally larger than females. BODY ...... 40 points Legs: Medium in length, back legs longer than front. Torso ...... 10 Feet: Medium to large, rounded with large knuckles. Tail ...... 10 Longhair must have toe tufts. Longhair (HD) must Boning ...... 8 have toe tufts. Musculature ...... 7 Tail: Short and thick. Bone length must be a minimum Legs/Feet ...... 5 of one inch in adults with proportional length in COAT/COLOR/PATTERN 20 points kittens. Should not extend past the hock. Kinks and Length ...... 6 curls are allowed. Texture ...... 6 Boning: Moderately heavy and substantial. Pattern ...... 4 Musculature: Well-muscled. Color ...... 4 COAT/COLOR/PATTERN: CATEGORY: All. Length: (HGS) Short, dense and resilient. Length: (HG) Longhair up to 2½ inches with shaggy DIVISION: Solid, Tortie, Tabby, Silver/Smoke belly hair that is longer than the rest of the coat. Texture: There will be texture variations depending COLORS: All. upon the color and coat length of the cat. Pattern: Tabby: All tabby patterns are allowed PERMISSIBLE OUTCROSSES: Pointed: Expression of the underlying tabby pattern is Domestic longhair/shorthair, not a member of a desirable. recognized breed. OTHER: HEAD: Balance: All parts of the body in proportion. Shape: Wide, inverted pear shaped head with Condition: Should reflect excellent health, good substantial width to the muzzle. muscle tone. Eyes: Medium to large sized, set far apart. Set on a Temperament: Must be unchallenging. slight bias. Slightly flattened or hooded oval in shape. Eye color is independent of coat color except in the GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Highlander is a pointed and mink category. muscular, athletic cat. Highlander cats come in both Ears: Medium to large, wide at the base, set as much shorthair and longhair. Physical characteristics on the top of the head as on the side, as erect as include a straight to slightly convex forehead and wide possible. Ears must be firm at the base, flexible at the nose, with the nose and muzzle forming a blunt look tips. Loose relaxed curl of no more than 90º, allowing in profile. The curled ear is seen in profile as a loose, the tips of the ears to be visible in a frontal view. No relaxed curl. The ears are wide-based, open and preference given to the direction the ear tips point in. stand tall. Ear furnishings and ear tufts are desired but not required. Kittens may have a greater degree of curl LOCKETS: Withhold all awards but not more than 90º by adulthood. Muzzle: Full, wide, strong with a definite break. ALLOWANCES: Tarnishing in silvers. Polydactyl feet. Prominent whisker pads should make the muzzle appear squared. . Muzzle length makes head appear PENALIZE: Ears that are not open or wide based, longer than wide. ears too small or low set. Tail too long. Excessive dip Chin: Strong and deep. Must align with the top of the in the nose. jaw. Profile: Rounded back skull, straight to slightly convex DISQUALIFY: Ears not erect. Tail too short or forehead, with a change of direction at the eye ridge, docked. may have a slight concave curve to the nose. Nose,

71 HIGHLANDER BREED GROUP (HG/HGS) The Highlander Shorthair (HGS) and Highlander Longhair (HG) are is a medium to large shorthair domestic muscular and athletic appearing cats. Distinguishing features are its sloping the straight to slightly convex forehead, wide nose bridge, blunt profile, and the loose relaxed curl to its wide based ears. The Highlander Longhair (HG) is the long hair version. HEAD ...... 40 points Nose: Wide with substantial nose leather. Shape ...... 6 BODY: Ears ...... 10 Torso: Medium to large in size with noticeable depth. Eyes ...... 5 Rectangular in shape. Straight back with hips higher Chin ...... 6 than shoulders. Overall muscled, athletic appearance. Muzzle ...... 6 Males are proportionally larger than females. Nose ...... 4 Legs: Medium in length, back legs longer than front. Profile ...... 3 Feet: Medium to large, rounded with large knuckles. BODY ...... 40 points Longhair (HD) must have toe tufts. Torso ...... 10 Tail: Short and thick. Bone length must be a minimum Tail ...... 10 of one inch in adults with proportional length in Boning ...... 8 kittens. Should not extend past the hock. Kinks and Musculature ...... 7 curls are allowed. Legs/Feet ...... 5 Boning: Moderately heavy and substantial. COAT/COLOR/PATTERN 20 points Musculature: Well-muscled. Length ...... 6 Texture ...... 6 COAT/COLOR/PATTERN: Pattern ...... 4 Length: (HGS) Short, dense and resilient. Color ...... 4 Length: (HG) Longhair up to 2½ inches with shaggy belly hair, that is longer than the rest of the coat. CATEGORY: All. Texture: There will be texture variations depending upon the color and coat length of the cat. DIVISION: Solid, Tortie, Tabby, Silver/Smoke (HGS) Resilient, snapping back into place. (HG) Soft. COLORS: All. Pattern: Tabby: All tabby patterns are allowed PERMISSIBLE OUTCROSSES: Pointed: Expression of the underlying tabby pattern is Domestic longhair/shorthair, not a member of a desirable. recognized breed. OTHER: HEAD: Balance: All parts of the body in proportion. Shape: Wide, inverted pear shaped head with Condition: Should reflect excellent health, good substantial width to the muzzle. muscle tone. Eyes: Medium to large sized, set far apart. Set on a Temperament: Must be unchallenging. slight bias. . Slightly flattened or hooded oval in shape. Eye color is independent of coat color except GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Highlander is a in the pointed and mink category. muscular, athletic domestic cat. Selective breeding Ears: Medium to large, wide at the base, set as much has contributed to protecting the unique features and on the top of the head as on the side, as erect as enhancing the bloodlines. Highlander cats come in possible. Ears must be firm at the base, flexible at the both shorthair and longhair. Physical characteristics tips. Loose relaxed curl of no more than 90º, allowing include a sloping straight to slightly convex forehead the tips of the ears to be visible in a frontal view. No and wide nose, with the nose and muzzle forming a preference given to the direction the ear tips point in. blunt look in profile. The curled ear is seen in profile Ear furnishings and ear tufts are desired but not as a loose, relaxed curl. The ears are wide-based, required. Kittens may have a greater degree of curl open and stand tall. but not more than 90º by adulthood. Muzzle: Full, wide, strong with a definite break. LOCKETS: Withhold all awards Prominent whisker pads should make the muzzle appear squared. Muzzle length makes head appear ALLOWANCES: Tarnishing in silvers longer than wide. Chin: Strong and deep. Must align with the top of the PENALIZE: Ears that are not open or wide based, jaw. ears too small or low set. Tail too long. Excessive dip Profile: Rounded back skull, sloping straight to slightly in the nose. convex forehead, with a change of direction at the eye ridge, may have a slight concave curve to the nose. DISQUALIFY: Ears not erect. Tail too short or Nose, muzzle and chin form a blunt look in profile. docked. Polydactyl feet.

72 HIGHLANDER BREED GROUP (HG/HGS) The Highlander Shorthair (HGS) and Highlander Longhair (HG) are medium to large muscular and athletic appearing cats. Distinguishing features are the straight to slightly convex forehead, wide nose bridge, blunt profile, and the loose relaxed curl to its wide based ears.

forehead, with a change of direction at the eye ridge, HEAD ...... 40 points may have a slight concave curve to the nose. Nose, Shape ...... 6 muzzle and chin form a blunt look in profile. Ears ...... 10 Nose: Wide with substantial nose leather. Eyes ...... 5 Chin ...... 6 BODY: Muzzle ...... 6 Torso: Medium to large in size with noticeable depth. Nose ...... 4 Rectangular in shape. Straight back with hips higher Profile ...... 3 than shoulders. Overall muscled, athletic appearance. BODY ...... 40 points Males are proportionally larger than females. Torso ...... 10 Legs: Medium in length, back legs longer than front. Tail ...... 10 Feet: Medium to large, rounded with large knuckles. Boning ...... 8 Longhair (HD) must have toe tufts. Musculature ...... 7 Tail: Short and thick. Bone length must be a minimum Legs/Feet ...... 5 of one inch in adults with proportional length in COAT/COLOR/PATTERN 20 points kittens. Should not extend past the hock. Kinks and Length ...... 6 curls are allowed. Texture ...... 6 Boning: Moderately heavy and substantial. Pattern ...... 4 Musculature: Well-muscled. Color ...... 4 COAT/COLOR/PATTERN: CATEGORY: All. Length: (HGS) Short, dense and resilient. Length: (HG) Longhair up to 2½ inches with shaggy DIVISION: Solid, Tortie, Tabby, Silver/Smoke belly hair that is longer than the rest of the coat. Texture: There will be texture variations depending COLORS: All. upon the color and coat length of the cat. Pattern: Tabby: All tabby patterns are allowed PERMISSIBLE OUTCROSSES: Pointed: Expression of the underlying tabby pattern is Domestic longhair/shorthair, not a member of a desirable.. recognized breed. OTHER: HEAD: Balance: All parts of the body in proportion. Shape: Wide, inverted pear shaped head with Condition: Should reflect excellent health, good substantial width to the muzzle. muscle tone. Eyes: Medium to large sized, set far apart. Set on a Temperament: Must be unchallenging. slight bias. Slightly flattened or hooded oval in shape. Eye color is independent of coat color except in the GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Highlander is a pointed and mink category. muscular, athletic cat. Highlander cats come in both Ears: Medium to large, wide at the base, set as much shorthair and longhair. Physical characteristics on the top of the head as on the side, as erect as include a straight to slightly convex forehead and wide possible. Ears must be firm at the base, flexible at the nose, with the nose and muzzle forming a blunt look tips. Loose relaxed curl of no more than 90º, allowing in profile. The curled ear is seen in profile as a loose, the tips of the ears to be visible in a frontal view. No relaxed curl. The ears are wide-based, open and preference given to the direction the ear tips point in. stand tall. Ear furnishings and ear tufts are desired but not required. Kittens may have a greater degree of curl LOCKETS: Withhold all awards but not more than 90º by adulthood. Muzzle: Full, wide, strong with a definite break. ALLOWANCES: Tarnishing in silvers. Prominent whisker pads should make the muzzle appear squared. . Muzzle length makes head appear PENALIZE: Ears that are not open or wide based, longer than wide. ears too small or low set. Tail too long. Excessive dip Chin: Strong and deep. Must align with the top of the in the nose. jaw. Profile: Rounded back skull, straight to slightly convex DISQUALIFY: Ears not erect. Tail too short or docked. Polydactyl feet.

73 Comments on Highlander Standard Changes

Rules

(BT) A comment...... the standard that allows poly....probably should have something under feet describing what is allowed and if there are a limit to the number of toes.

Genetics

(ML) If my opinion on polydactilism is requested as a Genetics Committee member, then I am against. Polydactilism, as many skeletal deformations, is a potential source of malfunctioning and pain. I do not see any reason to accept it in new breeds. The fact that the breeders like it is not enough. We should think of health and functionality of cats.

(HL) Pixibobs allow polydactyly so we already allow it in TICA. It depends on the genetic nature of the polydactyly. In the most common forms it cause no problem for the cats. On occasion it can cause problems with partial toes with nails that grow very oddly. I have known of a polydacty HHP that needed to be declawed because of it. OTOH the typical extra toe or two are not a problem.

Minks do need to have different eye color. You are not going to get gold or copper-eyed Minks.

(EC) I am of the opinion that we never should have accepted poly in the PB, so no on the poly for the highlanders

Agree with Heather that both mink and pointed for eye color

74 2013-2014 Show Season Counts Report Printed 12/11/2013 Page 1 (by Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

Region Shows Entries AB SP HHP BRD AAASIA 48 2453 132 78 0 0 GLGREAT LAKES 29 3733 100 49 0 26 MAMID ATLANTIC 7 873 36 10 0 0 MPMID PACIFIC 3 331 9 3 0 0 NENORTHEAST 18 2049 60 25 0 4 ENNORTHERN EUROPE 39 4202 133 46 0 28 NWNORTHWEST 27 2842 70 54 0 0 SASOUTH AMERICA 26 2042 55 27 0 0 SCSOUTH CENTRAL 30 3386 107 54 0 0 SESOUTHEAST 28 2885 97 45 0 1 ESSOUTHERN EUROPE 31 3324 109 35 0 15 SWSOUTHWEST 24 3207 85 37 0 3 EWWESTERN EUROPE 20 2129 63 36 0 10

Totals 330 33456 1056 499 0 87

75 (entry counts may include transfers) Report = sh_show_recap 2013-2014 Show Season Detail Report Printed 12/11/2013 (for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52) Page 1

Show Ring Counts Reg Show Date Club Name Count ABSP HHP BRD

ES 05/04/13 AUSTRIAN CATS UNITED 2 8 2 0 4 GL 05/04/13 PRAIRIE STATE CAT CLUB 2 010 0 0 NW 05/04/13 INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY CLUB 2 6 6 0 0 SC 05/11/13 ENCHANTED CAT CLUB 4 7 8 0 0 EN 05/18/13 KLUB KOTA X-TREME 2 8 2 0 1 ES 05/18/13 MACSKAMANIA CAT CLUB 2 6 4 0 0 SA 05/18/13 TICADELPLATA 4 5 3 0 0 SE 05/18/13 SKYWAY CAT CLUB OF TAMPA BAY 3 8 4 0 1 SW 05/18/13 SOCAL EXOTICA 2 6 4 0 0 AA 05/19/13 CLOUD 9 CAT CLUB 2 6 2 0 0 EN 05/25/13 VIKING CATS 3 6 3 0 0 EW 05/25/13 TIRNATICA 4 4 5 0 0 GL 05/25/13 GLASS CITICATS 2 6 6 0 6 EW 06/01/13 TICARUS 2 6 6 0 2 SC 06/01/13 FT WORTH FELINE FANCIERS, INC. 2 6 4 0 0 GL 06/08/13 WISCONSIN-ILLINOIS CAT FANCIERS 2 9 3 010 NW 06/08/13 COMMENCEMENT CAT FANCIERS 4 8 8 0 0 SA 06/08/13 CLUB DO GATO DO PARANA 3 6 3 0 0 SW 06/08/13 AMERICA'S FINEST FELINES 3 6 7 0 0 AA 06/09/13 BRILLIANT CAT FANCIERS 2 4 4 0 0 SA 06/15/13 CLUB FELINO DEL URUGUAY AFU-ARU 3 6 3 0 0 SE 06/15/13 NORTH ALABAMA FELINE FANCIERS 3 6 6 0 0 ES 06/22/13 SHADOW AND LIGHT 2 8 0 0 0 GL 06/22/13 GLASS CITICATS 3 6 6 0 0 NW 06/22/13 GARDEN CITY CAT CLUB 4 8 8 0 0 SA 06/22/13 FELIS CATUS CRIADORES ASSOCIADOS 3 8 4 0 0 AA 06/23/13 C.A.T. CREDO 1 6 2 0 0 AA 06/29/13 FOREST CAT JAPAN 4 8 8 0 0 EN 06/29/13 KOTOK CAT CLUB 2 6 2 0 4 SC 06/29/13 COMPADRES CAT CLUB 2 11 3 0 0 EW 06/30/13 TICKEDTICA CAT CLUB 2 0 6 0 0 EN 07/06/13 TICA CLUB JETCAT 2 6 2 0 2 SA 07/06/13 CRIADORES FELINOS COLOMBIANOS 3 8 4 0 0 SE 07/06/13 KUDZU KAT CLUB 2 4 6 0 0 AA 07/07/13 SHONAN CAT CLUB 2 6 4 0 0 GL 07/13/13 BUCKEYE OHIO ROLLERS CAT CLUB 2 8 4 0 0 NW 07/13/13 NW FELINE FRIENDS 2 8 4 0 0 SC 07/13/13 MAINE COON CONNECTION OF TEXAS, THE 2 12 4 0 0 MA 07/19/13 KEESTONE KATZ INC 3 13 3 0 0 SW 07/19/13 JAZZY VEGAS 3 14 4 0 0 EW 07/20/13 NATURALLYTICA 2 10 2 0 0 AA 07/26/13 TAIWAN CAT LOVERS CLUB 2 4 0 0 0 SE 07/27/13 HURRICANE CAT CLUB 2 9 3 0 0 AA 07/28/13 ENJOY CAT CLUB 2 4 4 0 0 SC 08/02/13 EVANGELINE COUNTRY CAT FANCIER 3 15 3 0 0 SA 08/03/13 CLUB FELINO DE ANTIOQUIA-CCFA 3 8 4 0 0 GL 08/09/13 WISCONSIN-ILLINOIS CAT FANCIERS 3 17 3 0 0 SW 08/10/13 KAT KNAPPERS CAT CLUB 3 6 7 0 0 EW 08/17/13 ONEFORALL CAT CLUB 2 8 2 0 0 NE 08/17/13 NAUTICATS 2 8 4 0 0 SE 08/17/13 SKYWAY CAT CLUB OF TAMPA BAY 2 9 3 0 0 EN 08/24/13 CRYSTAL 2 8 4 0 0 SC 08/24/13 YELLOW ROSE CAT CLUB 2 8 4 0 0 AA 08/31/13 KCAT (KOREA CAT ALL TOGETHER) 2 4 0 0 0 NW 08/31/13 EVERGREEN CAT FANCIERS, THE 1 10 2 0 0 EN 09/07/13 BE TICACATS CLUB 2 8 2 0 3 76 Report = sh_show_cnt 2013-2014 Show Season Detail Report Printed 12/11/2013 (for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52) Page 2

Show Ring Counts Reg Show Date Club Name Count ABSP HHP BRD

NE 09/07/13 CATS ON THE BEACH 2 9 5 0 0 AA 09/14/13 ENJOY CAT CLUB 2 8 8 0 0 EN 09/14/13 BEST BY CATS 4 11 3 0 2 EW 09/14/13 RAGTIMETICA 2 11 3 0 0 NW 09/14/13 THE CALGARY CAT ASSOCIATION 4 8 8 0 0 SC 09/14/13 KANSASKATZ INC 3 5 7 0 0 SE 09/14/13 CATTYSHACK CATS 2 7 5 0 0 AA 09/21/13 TAO TAO CAT CLUB 2 4 4 0 0 AA 09/21/13 FOREST CAT JAPAN 4 10 6 0 0 EN 09/21/13 CATS UNLIMITED GERMAN-AM CAT CLUB 2 10 2 0 3 GL 09/21/13 CATS RULE CAT CLUB 2 8 2 0 0 SA 09/21/13 TICADELPLATA 4 6 2 0 0 SC 09/22/13 MEXICAN CAT CLUB 1 2 0 0 0 EN 09/28/13 KLUB KOTA X-TREME 2 4 6 0 0 EN 09/28/13 PURR PURR 4 8 4 0 0 ES 09/28/13 EURO-CAT 2 8 2 0 0 NW 09/28/13 EDMONTON CAT FANCIERS 4 6 6 0 0 SE 09/28/13 CENTRAL FLORIDA CAT FANCIERS 2 8 4 0 0 SW 09/28/13 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CAT FANCIERS 2 8 2 0 0 AA 09/29/13 C.A.T. CREDO 2 6 2 0 0 SW 10/04/13 JAZZY VEGAS 3 13 4 0 3 EN 10/05/13 TICA CLUB JETCAT 2 12 0 0 0 EW 10/05/13 BENGAL CAT CLUB OF GREAT BRITAIN 2 8 4 0 3 SC 10/05/13 AUSTIN CAT FANCIERS 3 10 2 0 0 SE 10/05/13 SOUTHERN SOPHISTICATS 2 9 3 0 0 AA 10/12/13 CATS PARADISE PARTY 2 10 6 0 0 EN 10/12/13 BELGIAN TICA FRIENDS 2 12 0 0 0 ES 10/12/13 CATS FRENCH LOVERS 2 8 4 0 2 ES 10/12/13 NICA 2 0 6 0 0 GL 10/12/13 PRAIRIE STATE CAT CLUB 2 8 2 0 0 AA 10/19/13 BRILLIANT CAT FANCIERS 4 8 4 0 0 EN 10/19/13 FELIMUR 2 6 2 0 3 ES 10/19/13 AUSTRIAN CATS UNITED 2 12 0 0 0 GL 10/19/13 GREAT LAKES AREA CAT ENTHUSIASTS 4 9 3 0 4 NE 10/19/13 BOSCAT 4 11 4 0 2 NE 10/19/13 LES CHATS SUR LE ST-LAURENT 4 12 4 0 0 SC 10/19/13 RED RIVER RASCALS 2 4 8 0 0 SE 10/19/13 BLACK JACK CAT CLUB 3 10 2 0 0 SW 10/19/13 PURR POURRI OF KATS 2 8 2 0 0 EN 10/26/13 TICACATS 2 8 6 0 4 EW 10/26/13 CATTICA ALL BREEDS CAT CLUB 2 8 4 0 0 MP 10/26/13 WINE COUNTRY CAT CLUB 3 9 3 0 0 NW 10/26/13 CAT FANCIERS OF B. C. 4 8 8 0 0 SC 10/26/13 ENCHANTED CAT CLUB 2 10 2 0 0 AA 10/27/13 JAPAN GRAND CAT FANCIERS 2 4 4 0 0 SW 11/01/13 COATIMONDI CAT CLUB 3 15 3 0 0 AA 11/02/13 ALL JAPAN CAT CLUB 2 6 4 0 0 EN 11/02/13 CATS AND TULIPS 2 8 2 0 4 ES 11/02/13 ALL ABOUT CATS 2 4 4 0 4 ES 11/02/13 BREIZ CAT'S BAND 2 10 0 0 1 MA 11/02/13 KEESTONE KATZ INC 2 11 3 0 0 NE 11/02/13 LES CHATS SUR LE ST-LAURENT 4 12 4 0 0 AA 11/09/13 ENJOY CAT CLUB 2 8 4 0 0 EN 11/09/13 VIKING CATS 2 8 2 0 2 ES 11/09/13 CATIMINI CLUB 2 12 0 0 0 GL 11/09/13 GREAT LAKES FRIENDS OF FELINES 2 8 2 0 0 77 Report = sh_show_cnt 2013-2014 Show Season Detail Report Printed 12/11/2013 (for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52) Page 3

Show Ring Counts Reg Show Date Club Name Count ABSP HHP BRD

SE 11/09/13 VOLUNTEER CAT CLUB 3 8 4 0 0 AA 11/10/13 KOREA CAT CLUB 2 6 0 0 0 GL 11/15/13 BUCKEYE OHIO ROLLERS CAT CLUB 3 13 4 0 0 SA 11/15/13 CLUB FELINO DE ANTIOQUIA-CCFA 3 8 4 0 0 ES 11/16/13 MALTA CAT CLUB 3 3 3 0 0 ES 11/16/13 SHADOW AND LIGHT 2 7 1 0 0 EW 11/16/13 TICKEDTICA CAT CLUB 2 8 4 0 5 SC 11/16/13 ECONO CAT CLUB, INC 2 6 6 0 0 SE 11/16/13 SKYWAY CAT CLUB OF TAMPA BAY 2 9 3 0 0 SW 11/16/13 AMERICA'S FINEST FELINES 3 9 4 0 0 AA 11/17/13 TOKYO CAT CLUB 1 4 2 0 0 EN 11/23/13 THE FINTICAT CLUB 2 4 4 0 0 ES 11/23/13 MACSKAMANIA CAT CLUB 2 6 2 0 2 ES 11/23/13 GALLIC CAT, THE 2 7 3 0 0 NE 11/23/13 WESTCHESTER FELINE CLUB 2 8 4 0 2 SC 11/23/13 TURKISH VAN CAT CONNECTION 2 11 3 0 0 AA 11/24/13 SHONAN CAT CLUB 2 6 4 0 0 AA 11/30/13 FOREST CAT JAPAN 4 10 6 0 0 ES 11/30/13 BLUE DANUBE CAT CLUB 2 10 4 0 2 NW 11/30/13 THE MAINE EVENT 2 8 4 0 0 SE 11/30/13 ATLANTA FANTASTICATS 2 10 2 0 0 GL 12/07/13 WISCONSIN-ILLINOIS CAT FANCIERS 2 8 4 0 6 MA 12/07/13 CHRISTMAS CITY CAT CLUB 2 12 4 0 0

Totals 330 1056 499 0 87

78 Report = sh_show_cnt Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by AA Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

ASIA Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/19/13 CLOUD 9 CAT CLUB JAPAN 2 6 2 0 0 06/09/13 BRILLIANT CAT FANCIERS JAPAN 2 4 4 0 0 06/23/13 C.A.T. CREDO JAPAN 1 6 2 0 0 06/29/13 FOREST CAT JAPAN JAPAN 4 8 8 0 0 07/07/13 SHONAN CAT CLUB JAPAN 2 6 4 0 0 07/26/13 TAIWAN CAT LOVERS CLUB TAIWAN 2 4 0 0 0 07/28/13 ENJOY CAT CLUB JAPAN 2 4 4 0 0 08/31/13 KCAT (KOREA CAT ALL TOGETHER) SOUTH KOREA 2 4 0 0 0 09/14/13 ENJOY CAT CLUB JAPAN 2 8 8 0 0 09/21/13 TAO TAO CAT CLUB CHINA 2 4 4 0 0 09/21/13 FOREST CAT JAPAN JAPAN 4 10 6 0 0 09/29/13 C.A.T. CREDO JAPAN 2 6 2 0 0 10/12/13 CATS PARADISE PARTY JAPAN 2 10 6 0 0 10/19/13 BRILLIANT CAT FANCIERS JAPAN 4 8 4 0 0 10/27/13 JAPAN GRAND CAT FANCIERS JAPAN 2 4 4 0 0 11/02/13 ALL JAPAN CAT CLUB JAPAN 2 6 4 0 0 11/09/13 ENJOY CAT CLUB JAPAN 2 8 4 0 0 11/10/13 KOREA CAT CLUB SOUTH KOREA 2 6 0 0 0 11/17/13 TOKYO CAT CLUB JAPAN 1 4 2 0 0 11/24/13 SHONAN CAT CLUB JAPAN 2 6 4 0 0 11/30/13 FOREST CAT JAPAN JAPAN 4 10 6 0 0

Totals 48 132 78 0 0

79 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by EN Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

NORTHERN EUROPE Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/18/13 KLUB KOTA X-TREME POLAND 2 8 2 0 1 05/25/13 VIKING CATS DENMARK 3 6 3 0 0 06/29/13 KOTOK CAT CLUB UKRAINE 2 6 2 0 4 07/06/13 TICA CLUB JETCAT RUSSIA 2 6 2 0 2 08/24/13 CRYSTAL RUSSIA 2 8 4 0 0 09/07/13 BE TICACATS CLUB BELGIUM 2 8 2 0 3 09/14/13 BEST BY CATS BELARUS 4 11 3 0 2 09/21/13 CATS UNLIMITED GERMAN-AM CAT CLUB GERMANY 2 10 2 0 3 09/28/13 KLUB KOTA X-TREME POLAND 2 4 6 0 0 09/28/13 PURR PURR RUSSIA 4 8 4 0 0 10/05/13 TICA CLUB JETCAT RUSSIA 2 12 0 0 0 10/12/13 BELGIAN TICA FRIENDS BELGIUM 2 12 0 0 0 10/19/13 FELIMUR RUSSIA 2 6 2 0 3 10/26/13 TICACATS GERMANY 2 8 6 0 4 11/02/13 CATS AND TULIPS THE NETHERLANDS 2 8 2 0 4 11/09/13 VIKING CATS DENMARK 2 8 2 0 2 11/23/13 THE FINTICAT CLUB FINLAND 2 4 4 0 0

Totals 39 133 46 0 28

80 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by ES Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

SOUTHERN EUROPE Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/04/13 AUSTRIAN CATS UNITED AUSTRIA 2 8 2 0 4 05/18/13 MACSKAMANIA CAT CLUB HUNGARY 2 6 4 0 0 06/22/13 SHADOW AND LIGHT FRANCE 2 8 0 0 0 09/28/13 EURO-CAT FRANCE 2 8 2 0 0 10/12/13 CATS FRENCH LOVERS FRANCE 2 8 4 0 2 10/12/13 NICA ISRAEL 2 0 6 0 0 10/19/13 AUSTRIAN CATS UNITED AUSTRIA 2 12 0 0 0 11/02/13 ALL ABOUT CATS AUSTRIA 2 4 4 0 4 11/02/13 BREIZ CAT'S BAND FRANCE 2 10 0 0 1 11/09/13 CATIMINI CLUB FRANCE 2 12 0 0 0 11/16/13 MALTA CAT CLUB MALTA 3 3 3 0 0 11/16/13 SHADOW AND LIGHT FRANCE 2 7 1 0 0 11/23/13 MACSKAMANIA CAT CLUB HUNGARY 2 6 2 0 2 11/23/13 GALLIC CAT, THE FRANCE 2 7 3 0 0 11/30/13 BLUE DANUBE CAT CLUB AUSTRIA 2 10 4 0 2

Totals 31 109 35 0 15

81 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by EW Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

WESTERN EUROPE Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/25/13 TIRNATICA IRELAND 4 4 5 0 0 06/01/13 TICARUS ENGLAND 2 6 6 0 2 06/30/13 TICKEDTICA CAT CLUB ENGLAND 2 0 6 0 0 07/20/13 NATURALLYTICA ENGLAND 2 10 2 0 0 08/17/13 ONEFORALL CAT CLUB ENGLAND 2 8 2 0 0 09/14/13 RAGTIMETICA ENGLAND 2 11 3 0 0 10/05/13 BENGAL CAT CLUB OF GREAT BRITAIN ENGLAND 2 8 4 0 3 10/26/13 CATTICA ALL BREEDS CAT CLUB ENGLAND 2 8 4 0 0 11/16/13 TICKEDTICA CAT CLUB ENGLAND 2 8 4 0 5

Totals 20 63 36 0 10

82 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by GL Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

GREAT LAKES Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/04/13 PRAIRIE STATE CAT CLUB USA 2 010 0 0 05/25/13 GLASS CITICATS USA 2 6 6 0 6 06/08/13 WISCONSIN-ILLINOIS CAT FANCIERS USA 2 9 3 010 06/22/13 GLASS CITICATS USA 3 6 6 0 0 07/13/13 BUCKEYE OHIO ROLLERS CAT CLUB USA 2 8 4 0 0 08/09/13 WISCONSIN-ILLINOIS CAT FANCIERS USA 3 17 3 0 0 09/21/13 CATS RULE CAT CLUB USA 2 8 2 0 0 10/12/13 PRAIRIE STATE CAT CLUB USA 2 8 2 0 0 10/19/13 GREAT LAKES AREA CAT ENTHUSIASTS USA 4 9 3 0 4 11/09/13 GREAT LAKES FRIENDS OF FELINES USA 2 8 2 0 0 11/15/13 BUCKEYE OHIO ROLLERS CAT CLUB USA 3 13 4 0 0 12/07/13 WISCONSIN-ILLINOIS CAT FANCIERS USA 2 8 4 0 6

Totals 29 100 49 0 26

83 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by MA Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

MID ATLANTIC Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

07/19/13 KEESTONE KATZ INC USA 3 13 3 0 0 11/02/13 KEESTONE KATZ INC USA 2 11 3 0 0 12/07/13 CHRISTMAS CITY CAT CLUB USA 2 12 4 0 0

Totals 7 36 10 0 0

84 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by MP Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

MID PACIFIC Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

10/26/13 WINE COUNTRY CAT CLUB USA 3 9 3 0 0

Totals 3 9 3 0 0

85 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by NE Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

NORTHEAST Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

08/17/13 NAUTICATS USA 2 8 4 0 0 09/07/13 CATS ON THE BEACH USA 2 9 5 0 0 10/19/13 BOSCAT USA 4 11 4 0 2 10/19/13 LES CHATS SUR LE ST-LAURENT CANADA 4 12 4 0 0 11/02/13 LES CHATS SUR LE ST-LAURENT CANADA 4 12 4 0 0 11/23/13 WESTCHESTER FELINE CLUB USA 2 8 4 0 2

Totals 18 60 25 0 4

86 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by NW Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

NORTHWEST Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/04/13 INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY CLUB USA 2 6 6 0 0 06/08/13 COMMENCEMENT CAT FANCIERS USA 4 8 8 0 0 06/22/13 GARDEN CITY CAT CLUB CANADA 4 8 8 0 0 07/13/13 NW FELINE FRIENDS USA 2 8 4 0 0 08/31/13 EVERGREEN CAT FANCIERS, THE USA 1 10 2 0 0 09/14/13 THE CALGARY CAT ASSOCIATION CANADA 4 8 8 0 0 09/28/13 EDMONTON CAT FANCIERS CANADA 4 6 6 0 0 10/26/13 CAT FANCIERS OF B. C. CANADA 4 8 8 0 0 11/30/13 THE MAINE EVENT USA 2 8 4 0 0

Totals 27 70 54 0 0

87 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by SA Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

SOUTH AMERICA Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/18/13 TICADELPLATA ARGENTINA 4 5 3 0 0 06/08/13 CLUB DO GATO DO PARANA BRAZIL 3 6 3 0 0 06/15/13 CLUB FELINO DEL URUGUAY AFU-ARU URUGUAY 3 6 3 0 0 06/22/13 FELIS CATUS CRIADORES ASSOCIADOS BRAZIL 3 8 4 0 0 07/06/13 CRIADORES FELINOS COLOMBIANOS COLOMBIA 3 8 4 0 0 08/03/13 CLUB FELINO DE ANTIOQUIA-CCFA COLOMBIA 3 8 4 0 0 09/21/13 TICADELPLATA ARGENTINA 4 6 2 0 0 11/15/13 CLUB FELINO DE ANTIOQUIA-CCFA COLOMBIA 3 8 4 0 0

Totals 26 55 27 0 0

88 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by SC Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

SOUTH CENTRAL Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/11/13 ENCHANTED CAT CLUB USA 4 7 8 0 0 06/01/13 FT WORTH FELINE FANCIERS, INC. USA 2 6 4 0 0 06/29/13 COMPADRES CAT CLUB USA 2 11 3 0 0 07/13/13 MAINE COON CONNECTION OF TEXAS, THE USA 2 12 4 0 0 08/02/13 EVANGELINE COUNTRY CAT FANCIER USA 3 15 3 0 0 08/24/13 YELLOW ROSE CAT CLUB USA 2 8 4 0 0 09/14/13 KANSASKATZ INC USA 3 5 7 0 0 09/22/13 MEXICAN CAT CLUB MEXICO 1 2 0 0 0 10/05/13 AUSTIN CAT FANCIERS USA 3 10 2 0 0 10/19/13 RED RIVER RASCALS USA 2 4 8 0 0 10/26/13 ENCHANTED CAT CLUB USA 2 10 2 0 0 11/16/13 ECONO CAT CLUB, INC USA 2 6 6 0 0 11/23/13 TURKISH VAN CAT CONNECTION USA 2 11 3 0 0

Totals 30 107 54 0 0

89 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by SE Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

SOUTHEAST Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/18/13 SKYWAY CAT CLUB OF TAMPA BAY USA 3 8 4 0 1 06/15/13 NORTH ALABAMA FELINE FANCIERS USA 3 6 6 0 0 07/06/13 KUDZU KAT CLUB USA 2 4 6 0 0 07/27/13 HURRICANE CAT CLUB USA 2 9 3 0 0 08/17/13 SKYWAY CAT CLUB OF TAMPA BAY USA 2 9 3 0 0 09/14/13 CATTYSHACK CATS USA 2 7 5 0 0 09/28/13 CENTRAL FLORIDA CAT FANCIERS USA 2 8 4 0 0 10/05/13 SOUTHERN SOPHISTICATS USA 2 9 3 0 0 10/19/13 BLACK JACK CAT CLUB USA 3 10 2 0 0 11/09/13 VOLUNTEER CAT CLUB USA 3 8 4 0 0 11/16/13 SKYWAY CAT CLUB OF TAMPA BAY USA 2 9 3 0 0 11/30/13 ATLANTA FANTASTICATS USA 2 10 2 0 0

Totals 28 97 45 0 1

90 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Printed 12/11/2013 2013-2014 Show Season Regional Detail Report Page 1 (by SW Region for complete show season weekends 1 thru 52)

SOUTHWEST Show Ring Counts Show Date Club Name Country Count ABSP HHP BRD

05/18/13 SOCAL EXOTICA USA 2 6 4 0 0 06/08/13 AMERICA'S FINEST FELINES USA 3 6 7 0 0 07/19/13 JAZZY VEGAS USA 3 14 4 0 0 08/10/13 KAT KNAPPERS CAT CLUB USA 3 6 7 0 0 09/28/13 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CAT FANCIERS USA 2 8 2 0 0 10/04/13 JAZZY VEGAS USA 3 13 4 0 3 10/19/13 PURR POURRI OF KATS USA 2 8 2 0 0 11/01/13 COATIMONDI CAT CLUB USA 3 15 3 0 0 11/16/13 AMERICA'S FINEST FELINES USA 3 9 4 0 0

Totals 24 85 37 0 3

91 Report = sh_show_cnt_reg Show Ring Counts Count ABSP HHP BRD Report Totals for Audit 330 1056 499 0 87

92 Printed 12/11/2013 (Catalog list by weekend with title status) 2014 Show Season Page 1

Catalog Club Name Start Title Catalog Club Name Start Title ES0114 Austrian Cats United 05/04/2013 Y SW0314 Jazzy Vegas 07/19/2013 Y GL0114 Prairie State Cat Club 05/04/2013 Y Week 12 - Show Count 3 Title Confirmation Sent 08/28/2013 NW0114 International Specialty Club 05/04/2013 Y AA0614Enjoy Cat Club 07/28/2013 Y Week 01 - Show Count 3 Title Confirmation Sent 06/04/2013 AA0714Taiwan Cat Lovers Club 07/26/2013 Y SC0114Enchanted Cat Club 05/11/2013 Y SE0414Hurricane Cat Club 07/27/2013 Y Week 02 - Show Count 1 Title Confirmation Sent 06/04/2013 Week 13 - Show Count 3 Title Confirmation Sent 08/28/2013 AA0114Cloud 9 Cat Club 05/19/2013 Y SA0614Club Felino De Antioquia-ccfa 08/03/2013 Y EN0114Klub Kota X-treme 05/18/2013 Y SC0514Evangeline Country Cat Fancier 08/02/2013 Y ES0214Macskamania Cat Club 05/18/2013 Y Week 14 - Show Count 2 Title Confirmation Sent 08/28/2013 SA0114Ticadelplata 05/18/2013 Y GL0614Wisconsin-illinois Cat Fanciers 08/09/2013 Y SE0114Skyway Cat Club Of Tampa Bay 05/18/2013 Y SW0414Kat Knappers Cat Club 08/10/2013 Y SW0114Socal Exotica 05/18/2013 Y Week 15 - Show Count 2 Title Confirmation Sent 08/28/2013 Week 03 - Show Count 6 Title Confirmation Sent 07/20/2013 EW0514Oneforall Cat Club 08/17/2013 Y EN0214Viking Cats 05/25/2013 Y NE0114Nauticats 08/17/2013 Y EW0114Tirnatica 05/25/2013 Y SE0514Skyway Cat Club Of Tampa Bay 08/17/2013 Y GL0214Glass Citicats 05/25/2013 Y Week 16 - Show Count 3 Title Confirmation Sent 09/21/2013 Week 04 - Show Count 3 Title Confirmation Sent 07/20/2013 EN0514Crystal 08/24/2013 Y EW0214Ticarus 06/01/2013 Y SC0614Yellow Rose Cat Club 08/24/2013 Y SC0214Ft Worth Feline Fanciers, Inc. 06/01/2013 Y Week 17 - Show Count 2 Title Confirmation Sent 09/21/2013 Week 05 - Show Count 2 Title Confirmation Sent 07/20/2013 AA0814Kcat (korea Cat All Together) 08/31/2013 Y AA0214Brilliant Cat Fanciers 06/09/2013 Y NW0514Evergreen Cat Fanciers, The 08/31/2013 Y GL0314Wisconsin-illinois Cat Fanciers 06/08/2013 Y Week 18 - Show Count 2 Title Confirmation Sent 09/21/2013 NW0214Commencement Cat Fanciers 06/08/2013 Y SA0214Club Do Gato Do Parana 06/08/2013 Y EN0614Be Ticacats Club 09/07/2013 Y SW0214America's Finest Felines 06/08/2013 Y NE0214Cats On The Beach 09/07/2013 Y Week 06 - Show Count 5 Title Confirmation Sent 07/20/2013 Week 19 - Show Count 2 Title Confirmation Sent 10/17/2013 SA0314Club Felino Del Uruguay Afu-aru 06/15/2013 Y AA0914Enjoy Cat Club 09/14/2013 Y SE0214North Alabama Feline Fanciers 06/15/2013 Y EN0714Best By Cats 09/14/2013 Y Week 07 - Show Count 2 Title Confirmation Sent 07/20/2013 EW0614Ragtimetica 09/14/2013 Y NW0614The Calgary Cat Association 09/14/2013 Y AA0314C.a.t. Credo 06/23/2013 Y SC0714Kansaskatz Inc 09/14/2013 Y ES0314Shadow And Light 06/22/2013 Y SE0614Cattyshack Cats 09/14/2013 Y GL0414Glass Citicats 06/22/2013 Y Week 20 - Show Count 6 Title Confirmation Sent 10/17/2013 NW0314Garden City Cat Club 06/22/2013 Y SA0414Felis Catus Criadores Associados 06/22/2013 Y AA1014Tao Tao Cat Club 09/21/2013 Y Week 08 - Show Count 5 Title Confirmation Sent 08/07/2013 AA1114Forest Cat Japan 09/21/2013 Y EN0814Cats Unlimited German-am Cat Club 09/21/2013 Y AA0414Forest Cat Japan 06/29/2013 Y GL0714Cats Rule Cat Club 09/21/2013 Y EN0314Kotok Cat Club 06/29/2013 Y SA0714Ticadelplata 09/21/2013 Y EW0314Tickedtica Cat Club 06/30/2013 Y SC0814Mexican Cat Club 09/22/2013 Y SC0314Compadres Cat Club 06/29/2013 Y Week 21 - Show Count 6 Title Confirmation Sent 10/17/2013 Week 09 - Show Count 4 Title Confirmation Sent 08/07/2013 AA1214C.a.t. Credo 09/29/2013 Y AA0514Shonan Cat Club 07/07/2013 Y EN0914Klub Kota X-treme 09/28/2013 Y EN0414Tica Club Jetcat 07/06/2013 Y EN1014Purr Purr 09/28/2013 Y SA0514Criadores Felinos Colombianos 07/06/2013 Y ES0414Euro-cat 09/28/2013 Y SE0314Kudzu Kat Club 07/06/2013 Y NW0714Edmonton Cat Fanciers 09/28/2013 Y Week 10 - Show Count 4 Title Confirmation Sent 08/07/2013 SE0714Central Florida Cat Fanciers 09/28/2013 Y GL0514Buckeye Ohio Rollers Cat Club 07/13/2013 Y SW0514San Gabriel Valley Cat Fanciers 09/28/2013 Y NW0414Nw Feline Friends 07/13/2013 Y Week 22 - Show Count 7 Title Confirmation Sent 11/15/2013 SC0414Maine Coon Connection Of Texas, The 07/13/2013 Y EN1114Tica Club Jetcat 10/05/2013 Y Week 11 - Show Count 3 Title Confirmation Sent 08/07/2013 EW0714Bengal Cat Club Of Great Britain 10/05/2013 Y EW0414Naturallytica 07/20/2013 Y SC0914Austin Cat Fanciers 10/05/2013 Y MA0114Keestone Katz Inc 07/19/2013 Y SE0814Southern Sophisticats 10/05/2013 Y 93 Report = title_weekend_list Printed 12/11/2013 (Catalog list by weekend with title status) 2014 Show Season Page 2

Catalog Club Name Start Title Catalog Club Name Start Title SW0614 Jazzy Vegas 10/04/2013 Y ES1414 Gallic Cat, The 11/23/2013 Y Week 23 - Show Count 5 Title Confirmation Sent 11/15/2013 NE0614 Westchester Feline Club 11/23/2013 N SC1314 Turkish Van Cat Connection 11/23/2013 N AA1314Cats Paradise Party 10/12/2013 Y Week 30 - Show Count 6 EN1214Belgian Tica Friends 10/12/2013 Y ES0514Cats French Lovers 10/12/2013 Y AA2114 Forest Cat Japan 11/30/2013 N ES0614Nica 10/12/2013 Y ES1514 Blue Danube Cat Club 11/30/2013 N GL0814Prairie State Cat Club 10/12/2013 Y NW0914 The Maine Event 11/30/2013 N Week 24 - Show Count 5 Title Confirmation Sent 11/15/2013 SE1214 Atlanta Fantasticats 11/30/2013 N Week 31 - Show Count 4 AA1414Brilliant Cat Fanciers 10/19/2013 Y EN1314Felimur 10/19/2013 Y ENXX14 Ticacats 12/06/2013 N ES0714Austrian Cats United 10/19/2013 Y GL1214 Wisconsin-illinois Cat Fanciers 12/07/2013 N GL0914Great Lakes Area Cat Enthusiasts 10/19/2013 Y MA0314 Christmas City Cat Club 12/07/2013 N NE0314Boscat 10/19/2013 Y Week 32 - Show Count 3 NE0414Les Chats Sur Le St-laurent 10/19/2013 Y AAXX14 C.a.t. Credo 12/15/2013 N SC1014Red River Rascals 10/19/2013 Y ENXX14 Crystal 12/14/2013 N SE0914Black Jack Cat Club 10/19/2013 Y EWXX14 The Spoticat Club 12/13/2013 N SW0714Purr Pourri Of Kats 10/19/2013 Y SAXX14 Allegro Cat Club 12/14/2013 N Week 25 - Show Count 9 Title Confirmation Sent 11/15/2013 SCXX14 International Feline Showcase, The 12/13/2013 N AA1514Japan Grand Cat Fanciers 10/27/2013 Y SWXX14 Kat Knappers Cat Club 12/14/2013 N EN1414Ticacats 10/26/2013 Y Week 33 - Show Count 6 EW0814Cattica All Breeds Cat Club 10/26/2013 Y AAXX14 Cats Paradise Party 12/22/2013 N MP0114Wine Country Cat Club 10/26/2013 Y Week 34 - Show Count 1 NW0814Cat Fanciers Of B. C. 10/26/2013 Y SC1114Enchanted Cat Club 10/26/2013 Y EWXX14 Tickedtica Cat Club 01/05/2014 N Week 26 - Show Count 6 Title Confirmation Sent 11/15/2013 MPXX14 Jazzy Cats Cat Club 01/03/2014 N SEXX14 First In Flight Cat Club 01/03/2014 N AA1614All Japan Cat Club 11/02/2013 Y Week 36 - Show Count 3 EN1514Cats And Tulips 11/02/2013 Y ES0814All About Cats 11/02/2013 Y ENXX14 Best By Cats 01/11/2014 N ES0914Breiz Cat's Band 11/02/2013 Y GLXX14 Great Lakes Friends Of Felines 01/11/2014 N MA0214Keestone Katz Inc 11/02/2013 Y MAXX14 Central Jersey Cat Fanciers 01/10/2014 N NE0514Les Chats Sur Le St-laurent 11/02/2013 Y Week 37 - Show Count 3 SW0814Coatimondi Cat Club 11/01/2013 Y EWXX14 Tirnatica 01/18/2014 N Week 27 - Show Count 7 SEXX14 Florida Sun Cats 01/17/2014 N AA1714 Enjoy Cat Club 11/09/2013 Y SWXX14 Socal Exotica 01/18/2014 N AA1814 Korea Cat Club 11/10/2013 Y Week 38 - Show Count 3 EN1614 Viking Cats 11/09/2013 Y MPXX14 New Culture Club, The 01/24/2014 N ES1014 Catimini Club 11/09/2013 Y Week 39 - Show Count 1 GL1014 Great Lakes Friends Of Felines 11/09/2013 Y AAXX14 Enjoy Cat Club 02/01/2014 N SE1014 Volunteer Cat Club 11/09/2013 Y SEXX14 Party Cats 02/01/2014 N Week 28 - Show Count 6 Week 40 - Show Count 2 AA1914 Tokyo Cat Club 11/17/2013 Y ESXX14 Estheticat 02/08/2014 N ES1114 Malta Cat Club 11/16/2013 Y MAXX14 Karousel Kats 02/07/2014 N ES1214 Shadow And Light 11/16/2013 Y NWXX14 Evergreen Cat Fanciers, The 02/08/2014 N EW0914 Tickedtica Cat Club 11/16/2013 Y Week 41 - Show Count 3 GL1114 Buckeye Ohio Rollers Cat Club 11/15/2013 Y SA0814 Club Felino De Antioquia-ccfa 11/15/2013 N AAXX14 Japan Grand Cat Fanciers 02/23/2014 N SC1214 Econo Cat Club, Inc 11/16/2013 Y ENXX14 Major 02/22/2014 N SE1114 Skyway Cat Club Of Tampa Bay 11/16/2013 Y ESXX14 Ticat 02/22/2014 N SW0914 America's Finest Felines 11/16/2013 Y NEXX14 Salty Cats 02/22/2014 N Week 29 - Show Count 9 Week 43 - Show Count 4 AA2014 Shonan Cat Club 11/24/2013 N EWXX14 Tickedtica Cat Club 03/07/2014 N EN1714 The Finticat Club 11/23/2013 N Week 45 - Show Count 1 ES1314 Macskamania Cat Club 11/23/2013 N 94 Report = title_weekend_list Printed 12/11/2013 (Catalog list by weekend with title status) 2014 Show Season Page 3

Catalog Club Name Start Title ENXX14 Cats 4 Us 03/29/2014 N SEXX14 Vision Cat Club 03/30/2014 N Week 48 - Show Count 2

Annual Show Count 165

95 Report = title_weekend_list Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 AA ASIA Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone ACT CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active JURI YAWATA [email protected] (336)727-838 ALL JAPAN CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active KINUE KAWAHASHI (052)691-9729 BRILLIANT CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active KAORU KURODA (482)813-106 C.A.T. CREDO 05/01/2014 Active HARUYO TOMONARI [email protected] (028)366-2326 CATS PARADISE PARTY 05/01/2014 Active HISAE TASAKI [email protected] CLOUD 9 CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active YUMEKO KATOH (028)623-6013 DANCE WITH CATS CLUB 05/01/2014 Active ENJOY CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active MOTOKO OIZUMI [email protected] (148)642-5907 FOREST CAT JAPAN 05/01/2014 Active MITSUKO SHONO (093)761-5766 FOUR LEAF CLOVER CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active OSAMU ISODA [email protected] (136)220-1212 GLOBAL CAT UNION 05/01/2014 Active NAHOKO KAIZUKA [email protected] (129)748-0874 I BOQ CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active SHEIKH GADAFFI [email protected] (+60)199-8546 JAPAN CAT LOVERS 05/01/2014 Active MIMI TSURUOKA [email protected] (358)105-166 JAPAN GRAND CAT FANCIERS 05/14/2014 Active TOSHIKO OHNISHI [email protected] (182)246-0347 KCAT (KOREA CAT ALL TOGETHER) 05/01/2014 Active CHUE HEE NOH [email protected] (010)717-4747 KINGDOM CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active IKUO SHINDO [email protected] (092)892-6460 KOREA CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active SANG WON PARK [email protected] (011)292-5262 SHONAN CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active RYOKO DOI [email protected] (146)725-0843 TAIWAN CAT LOVERS CLUB 05/01/2014 Active YU RONG HUNG TAO TAO CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active CHANGQING LI [email protected] (136)031-6188 THE THREE C 05/01/2014 Active MARIKO KIKUCHI [email protected] (033)290-7057 TOKYO CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active ERIKO ODAKA [email protected] (033)761-1020

Club Count 22

96 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 EN NORTHERN EUROPE Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone BE TICACATS CLUB 05/01/2014 Active GERALDINE TESSENS [email protected] (049)963-2034 BELGIAN TICA FRIENDS 05/01/2014 Active WILLEM STRAETMANS [email protected] BELGIUM CAT LOVERS 05/01/2014 Active MARCEL LOUWYCK [email protected] (323)458-4885 BEST BY CATS 05/01/2014 Active OLGA STAROVOITOVA [email protected] (+37)529-7788 CATS 4 US 05/01/2014 Active RALF WEBER [email protected] CATS AND TULIPS 05/01/2014 Active MIRIAM MULLER [email protected] CATS UNLIMITED GERMAN-AM CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active CLAUS-PETER KUCZERA [email protected] CRYSTAL 05/01/2014 Active OLGA MURASHKO [email protected] FELIMUR 05/01/2014 Active SVETLANA ZHIVANOVA [email protected] KLUB KOTA X-TREME 05/01/2014 Active JAROSLAW KLOSINSKI [email protected] KOTOK CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active MYKHAYLO TIMENKO [email protected] MAJOR 05/01/2014 Active ALEXANDER TREKIN [email protected] MOSCOW CAT CLUB GOLDEN DOMES 05/01/2014 Active SERGEY GRISHIN (095)430-6873 NORTICATS 05/01/2014 Active ANITA H ENGEBAKKEN [email protected] (475)538-0996 PURR PURR 05/01/2014 Active VITALY ABINYAKIN [email protected] RAGDOLL ARBEITS GEMEINSCHAFT E V 05/01/2014 Active GUDRUN KIPPE [email protected] (972)168-9711 THE FINTICAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active JENNI TOIVONIEMI [email protected] (840)740-2752 TICA CLUB JETCAT 05/01/2014 Active ANNA KARPOVA [email protected] TICACATS 05/01/2014 Active AMY STADTER [email protected] (626)291-6127 VIKING CATS 05/01/2014 Active JENNY-MARGRETHE VEJ [email protected]

Club Count 20

97 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 ES SOUTHERN EUROPE Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone ALL ABOUT CATS 05/01/2014 Active MONIKA DANY [email protected] (650)235-7588 AUSTRIAN CATS UNITED 05/01/2014 Active ROBERT KOLAR JUN [email protected] AZUR CATS 05/01/2014 Active NICOLE CHANIEL BLUE DANUBE CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active KATHARINA KRENN [email protected] BREIZ CAT'S BAND 05/01/2014 Active CATHERINE LE TRIONNAIRE [email protected] (029)756-8035 CATIMINI CLUB 05/01/2014 Active PATRICK LETERRIER [email protected] (+33)238-7524 CATS FRENCH LOVERS 05/01/2014 Active PASCAL REMY [email protected] ESTHETICAT 05/01/2014 Active ANTONIA ALEKSOVA [email protected] EURO-CAT 05/01/2014 Active CLAUDE-HELENE JEULIN (238)767-502 FELIS SERBICA 05/01/2014 Active MILAN BISENIC GALLIC CAT, THE 05/01/2014 Active MARTINE CAILLARD [email protected] (324)821-0204 MACSKAMANIA CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active BELA ARADI [email protected] (361)420-5585 MALTA CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active MARVIC ATTARD GIALANZE [email protected] NICA 05/01/2014 Active VIKTORIA STARODUBTSEVA [email protected] SHADOW AND LIGHT 05/01/2014 Active MARIE FRANCE DENDAUW [email protected] (014)132-0280 ST HELEN'S & APHRODITE'S CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active ELENI PAPALEONTIOU [email protected] TICAT 05/01/2014 Active EMANUELA PREVITALI [email protected] (036)537-6952

Club Count 17

98 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 EW WESTERN EUROPE Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone BENGAL CAT CLUB OF GREAT BRITAIN 05/01/2014 Active PETER EDWARDS [email protected] (174)671-0498 CATTICA ALL BREEDS CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active POPPI CLEMENTS [email protected] (143)468-4520 CELTICAT 05/01/2014 Active JONATHAN KENNEDY [email protected] NATURALLYTICA 05/01/2014 Active DELSA RUDGE [email protected] (170)989-2077 ONEFORALL CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active TONY YATES [email protected] (165)265-6039 RAGTIMETICA 05/01/2014 Active TERESA CORNWELL [email protected] THE SPOTICAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active LINDSEY WRIGHT [email protected] (125)676-1835 TICARUS 05/01/2014 Active JEANNINE PARFITT [email protected] (186)577-4432 TICKEDTICA CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active VALERIE DAVIDSON [email protected] (163)457-2181 TIRNATICA 05/01/2014 Active ROBERT DUNNE [email protected] VAN TICA 05/01/2014 Active JASON LOMBARD-JORDAN [email protected] (012)966-8228

Club Count 11

99 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 GL GREAT LAKES Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone BUCKEYE OHIO ROLLERS CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active HEATHER LORIMER [email protected] (330)792-3677 CAT CHAT CLUB, THE 05/01/2014 Active J G WILLIAMS (204)728-4245 CATS RULE CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active MARGARET KARPEN [email protected] (414)383-4241 CMC CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active CLAIRE VUCETICH [email protected] (708)453-0867 FLYING FELINES 05/01/2014 Active CHRISTINA UNANGST [email protected] (919)671-1197 GLASS CITICATS 05/01/2014 Active MIGUEL VASQUEZ [email protected] (419)343-9854 GREAT LAKES AREA CAT ENTHUSIASTS 05/01/2014 Active SUSAN LEE [email protected] (517)332-2184 GREAT LAKES CAT CONSORTIUM, INC. 05/01/2014 Active JAMIE E CHRISTIAN [email protected] GREAT LAKES FRIENDS OF FELINES 05/01/2014 Active WILLIAM L LEE [email protected] (517)332-2184 PRAIRIE STATE CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active SHERRI SKINNER [email protected] (262)886-2962 WISCONSIN-ILLINOIS CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active NIKKI CRANDALL-SEIBERT [email protected] (815)633-6104

Club Count 11

100 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 MA MID ATLANTIC Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone CENTRAL JERSEY CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active GLORIA ADLER [email protected] (570)620-1599 CHRISTMAS CITY CAT CLUB 05/01/2079 Active THERESA VOGEL [email protected] (484)505-9382 JERSEY STATE FELINE FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active LINDA SWIERCZYNSKI [email protected] (856)753-9115 KAROUSEL KATS 05/01/2014 Active BARBARA KISSINGER [email protected] (484)554-3627 KEESTONE KATZ INC 05/01/2079 Active GLADYS DINUNZIO [email protected] (410)620-0250 LEHIGH VALLEY CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active SUSAN ADLER [email protected] (570)620-1599

Club Count 6

101 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 MP MID PACIFIC Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone EAST OF EDEN CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2079 Active CAROL BARTON [email protected] (831)375-0801 JAZZY CATS CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active WAYNE MAHAN (209)745-6302 NEW CULTURE CLUB, THE 05/01/2014 Active CONNIE HAZEL [email protected] (503)256-1684 SILVER CATS, THE 05/01/2014 Active MICHELE LANI [email protected] (775)835-8545 WINE COUNTRY CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active BETH BEARRY [email protected] (209)223-3040

Club Count 5

102 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 NE NORTHEAST Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone BOSCAT 05/01/2014 Active JAMES P REARDON [email protected] (617)939-4795 CATS ON THE BEACH 05/01/2014 Active MELISSA ALEXANDER [email protected] (774)275-1420 CITY LIGHTS KITTKATT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active DAVID NUDLEMAN [email protected] (516)599-1708 LES CHATS SUR LE ST-LAURENT 05/01/2014 Active BARBARA GARNEAU [email protected] (514)349-9159 NAUTICATS 05/01/2014 Active DONNA MADISON [email protected] (207)831-6369 SALTY CATS 05/01/2014 Active MELISSA ALEXANDER [email protected] (774)275-1420 WESTCHESTER FELINE CLUB 05/01/2014 Active MICHAEL DENTICO [email protected] (845)429-9553

Club Count 7

103 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 NW NORTHWEST Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone CAN-AM CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active YVONNE PATRICK [email protected] (604)823-4777 CAT FANCIERS OF B. C. 05/01/2014 Active GILLIAN HUBER [email protected] (250)475-0963 COMMENCEMENT CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active ELLEN V CROCKETT [email protected] (360)385-9635 EDMONTON CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active KATHY BYRAM [email protected] (780)903-1766 EVERGREEN CAT FANCIERS, THE 05/01/2014 Active MICHELE MISLANG [email protected] (425)290-7522 GARDEN CITY CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active MARILYN MCCORKINDALE [email protected] (250)642-2915 INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY CLUB 05/01/2014 Active ELAINE WEITZ [email protected] (206)920-9214 NEW CULTURE CLUB NW, THE 05/01/2014 Active CONNIE HAZEL [email protected] (503)256-1684 NW FELINE FRIENDS 05/01/2014 Active MICHAEL PFISTER [email protected] (253)653-1572 OKANAGAN VALLEY CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active MUNIRA MURREY [email protected] (250)764-4052 PACIFIC NORTHWEST OUTLAWS 05/01/2014 Active SHIRLEY DELONG [email protected] (206)498-4147 THE CALGARY CAT ASSOCIATION 05/01/2014 Active MAUREEN DAVIES [email protected] (403)239-9519 THE MAINE EVENT 05/01/2014 Active ELAINE WEITZ [email protected] (206)920-9214 WHITE HATTERS CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2079 Active ELLEN V CROCKETT [email protected] (360)385-9635

Club Count 14

104 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 SA SOUTH AMERICA Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone ALLEGRO CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active ANA CLAUDIA DE SOUZA ANDRADE [email protected] ARGENTICATS 05/01/2014 Active CRISTIAN JAVIER ABOITIZ [email protected] CLUB DO GATO DO PARANA 05/01/2014 Active VERA GABARDO [email protected] CLUB FELINO DE ANTIOQUIA-CCFA 05/01/2014 Active CECILIA MOSSOS LEYVA [email protected] CLUB FELINO DEL URUGUAY AFU-ARU 05/01/2014 Active MAGELA ALONSO [email protected] CRIADORES FELINOS COLOMBIANOS 05/01/2014 Active JUAN MANUEL JEREZ SALAMANCA [email protected] (320)891-2938 FELIS CATUS CRIADORES ASSOCIADOS 05/01/2014 Active VIRGINIA LOPES ARAUJO (551)332-7674 SPRINGCAT CLUB FELINO 05/01/2014 Active ALVARO SAAVEDRA GONZALEZ [email protected] (574)444-2335 TICADELPLATA 05/01/2014 Active CARLOS DANIEL LOPEZ [email protected] (114)862-0986 UNIGAT-BR 05/01/2014 Active JULIANA MACHADO BATISTA DA SILVA [email protected]

Club Count 10

105 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 SC SOUTH CENTRAL Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone ARKLATEX CAT SOCIETY 05/01/2014 Active CINDY COLBERT [email protected] (318)949-2058 AUSTIN CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2079 Active ALLAN M SEILS [email protected] (512)441-6575 BIG TEX CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active MARICIA MUNDEN [email protected] (972)867-0683 COMPADRES CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active SUE CAROL BECKNELL [email protected] (915)584-5798 ECONO CAT CLUB, INC 05/01/2014 Active DIANE SWABBY-CAHILL [email protected] (303)576-6800 ENCHANTED CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active PAT HARDING [email protected] (505)298-4513 EVANGELINE COUNTRY CAT FANCIER 05/01/2079 Active STEVEN PAUL SAVANT [email protected] (337)989-0085 FT WORTH FELINE FANCIERS, INC. 05/01/2014 Active AUBREY JOE EDWARDS SR [email protected] (817)926-7822 HIGH ON CATS 05/01/2014 Active BRENDA MILLER [email protected] (719)395-9479 INTERNATIONAL FELINE SHOWCASE, THE 05/01/2014 Active JAMES ARMEL [email protected] (832)423-6586 KANSASKATZ INC 05/01/2014 Active RICHARD HUMMEL [email protected] (316)619-5938 MAINE COON CONNECTION OF TEXAS, THE 05/01/2014 Active CAROL S HALE [email protected] (713)666-3333 MEXICAN CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active JOSE LUIS PAYRO (555)513-0455 MISSION CITY CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active EDWINA LOTT [email protected] (210)843-1336 NEKO JUNIOR ACHIEVERS CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active LANNA K EDMONDS [email protected] (817)774-5660 RED RIVER RASCALS 05/01/2014 Active CAMELIA DRAKE [email protected] (940)937-2669 SOUTH CENTRAL ANNUAL TEAM 2008 05/01/2014 Active D'ANN E KOVIC [email protected] (972)867-0683 TEXAS MAINE COONFEDERACY CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active CAROL S HALE [email protected] (713)666-3333 THUNDERKATZ, INC 05/01/2014 Active CHARLES NELL [email protected] (405)324-2783 TURKISH VAN CAT CONNECTION 05/01/2014 Active BARBARA LINDSEY [email protected] (903)527-2357 YELLOW ROSE CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active JACKIE ROSE [email protected] (303)819-9818

Club Count 21

106 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 SE SOUTHEAST Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone ALABAMA PAWS & CLAWS 05/01/2014 Active HONEY GILMORE [email protected] (205)833-0834 ALLCATS CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active SUZANNE HANSEN [email protected] (904)641-1809 ATLANTA FANTASTICATS 05/01/2014 Active ALISA C COFFEY [email protected] (770)390-9772 ATLANTA MANX BREEDERS SOCIETY 05/01/2079 Active JAY HAWKINS (404)457-1715 BLACK JACK CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active MARIANNE LAWRENCE [email protected] (828)433-7905 CATTYSHACK CATS 05/01/2014 Active ELIZABETH D FLYNN [email protected] (404)860-1521 CENTRAL FLORIDA CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active RACHEL R ROBINSON-ZIMMER [email protected] (386)304-2810 DESTINY CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active KIM TOMLIN [email protected] (334)508-0082 FIRST IN FLIGHT CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active CHRISTINA UNANGST [email protected] (919)671-1197 FLORIDA SUN CATS 05/01/2014 Active SUZANNE HANSEN [email protected] (904)641-1809 HURRICANE CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active ROBERT I SELISKAR [email protected] (813)968-5342 KITT FLICKS PRODUCTIONS INC 05/01/2014 Active WENDELL PATTON [email protected] (803)754-9975 KUDZU KAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active CHARLOTTE SWANSON [email protected] (828)327-2441 MYSTICAL MOON CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active CLINTON KNAPP [email protected] (860)267-0496 NORTH ALABAMA FELINE FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active LYNNE SHERER [email protected] (901)372-3394 PARTY CATS 05/01/2014 Active JUDITH JOHNSON [email protected] (678)858-8505 PEACHTREE PURRFECT PAWS 05/01/2014 Active JOHN F SOKOL [email protected] (770)364-5565 SANDY CLAWS CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active STEVEN LAWSON [email protected] (941)751-9495 SKYWAY CAT CLUB OF TAMPA BAY 05/01/2014 Active THERESA KEMPTON [email protected] (727)289-1989 SOUTHERN SOPHISTICATS 05/01/2014 Active LAURA HEINECK [email protected] (706)374-4216 VISION CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active VANADIS CRAWFORD [email protected] (919)870-8624 VOLUNTEER CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active STEPHANIE SMITH [email protected] (423)261-2049

Club Count 22

107 Report = club_active Active TICA Clubs Printed 12/11/2013 SW SOUTHWEST Page 1

Club Name Club Exp Status Contact Name, eMail, Phone AMERICA'S FINEST FELINES 05/01/2014 Active ALEXANDRA CHISHOLM [email protected] (760)788-0562 CATS AND SIN CITY 05/01/2014 Active SUSANNA SHON [email protected] (702)448-3941 COATIMONDI CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active BOBBIE TULLO [email protected] (928)978-0487 JAZZY VEGAS 05/01/2014 Active GLORIA MAHAN [email protected] (209)745-6302 KAT KNAPPERS CAT CLUB 05/01/2014 Active DONALD WRIGHT [email protected] (562)697-2389 PURR POURRI OF KATS 05/01/2014 Active ANNE RITZINGER [email protected] (949)427-3194 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CAT FANCIERS 05/01/2014 Active BONNIE WILSON [email protected] (949)388-5883 SOCAL EXOTICA 05/01/2014 Active CHARLES PEALER [email protected] (951)776-2045

Club Count 8

108 Report = club_active