ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY and OPACITY” • 3 Weeks Lecture Course • Textbook: ”Atomic Astrophysics and Spectroscopy” -A.K

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY and OPACITY” • 3 Weeks Lecture Course • Textbook: ”Atomic Astrophysics and Spectroscopy” -A.K ”ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY AND OPACITY” • 3 Weeks Lecture Course • Textbook: ”Atomic Astrophysics and Spectroscopy” -A.K. Pradhan and S.N. Nahar (Cambridge, 2011) SULTANA N. NAHAR Department of Astronomy The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USA Email: naharastronomy.ohio-state.edu Web: www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/∼nahar Physics Department Cairo University, Giza, Egypt February 16 - March 7, 2013 Support: DOE, NSF, OSC, Cairo University 1 ”ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY AND OPACITY” • 3 Weeks Lecture Course • Textbook: ”Atomic Astrophysics and Spectroscopy” (AAS) -A.K. Pradhan and S.N. Nahar (Cambridge, 2011) Lecture Topics: Week 1: • Physics and Astronomy Connection i) Elements and Spectroscopy ii) Opacity and Observations iii) The Sun and Evolution of Spectroscopy iv) Electron and Photon Distribution Functions v) The Plasma Universe • Atomic Structure and Spectroscopy i) Hydrogen - Single electron energy and wave functions ii) Quantum numbers n,l,m, s, parity iii) Spectral lines - Rydberg formula Week 2: • Atomic Structure, Computation with SUPERSTRUCTURE & Atomic Processes i) Multi-election Systems - Angular Sates ii) Angular Couplings, Quantum Defects iii) Hartee-Fock Approximation iv) Central Field Approximations v) Dirac Equation, Breit-Pauli Approximation, Dirac-Fock 2 Approximation vi) Atomic Processes of Plasma Opacity Week 3: • Plasma Opacity, R-matrix Calculations for Atomic Processes i) Autoionization and Resonances and Opacity ii) Plasma Opacity iii) Close-Coupling Approximation and R-matrix Method iv) R-matrix Calculations 3 i) Elements and Spectroscopy: ELEMENTS (Key Information) • Periodic TableP E R I O D ofI C T elements A B L E (Ref. NIST) Group 1 Atomic Properties of the Elements 18 IA VIIIA 2S 1S 1 1/2 Frequently used fundamental physical constants Physics Standard Reference 2 0 For the most accurate values of these and other constants, visit physics.nist.gov/constants Laboratory Data Group 1 H 1 second = 9 192 631 770 periods of radiation corresponding to the transition physics.nist.gov www.nist.gov/srd He Hydrogen 133 Helium 1.00794 between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of Cs 4.002602 -1 2 1s 2 speed of light in vacuum c 299 792 458 m s (exact) Solids 13 14 15 16 17 1s -34 13.5984 IIA Planck constant h 6.6261 × 10 J s ( /2 ) IIIA IVA VA VIA VIIA 24.5874 -19 Liquids 2S 1S elementary charge e 1.6022 × 10 C 2P° 3P 4S° 3P 2P° 1S 3 1/2 4 0 -31 Gases 5 1/2 6 0 7 3/2 8 2 9 3/2 10 0 electron mass me 9.1094 × 10 kg 2 Li Be mec 0.5110 MeV Artificially B C N O F Ne 2 Lithium Beryllium -27 Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon proton mass mp 1.6726 × 10 kg Prepared 6.941 9.012182 10.811 12.0107 14.0067 15.9994 18.9984032 20.1797 2 2 2 fine-structure constant 1/137.036 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 4 2 2 5 2 2 6 -1 1s 2s 2p 1s 2s 1s 1s 2s 1s 2s 1s 2s 1s 2s Rydberg constant R 10 973 732 m 2p 2s 2p 1s 2s 2p 2p 2p 5.3917 9.3227 8.2980 11.2603 14.5341 13.6181 17.4228 21.5645 R c 3.289 842 × 1015 Hz 2S 1S 2P 3P 4S 3P 2P 1S 11 1/2 12 0 R hc 13.6057 eV 13 1/2° 14 0 15 3/2° 16 2 17 3/2° 18 0 - - Na Mg Boltzmann constant k 1.3807 × 10 23 J K 1 Al Si P S Cl Ar 3 Sodium Magnesium Aluminum Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon 22.989770 24.3050 26.981538 28.0855 30.973761 32.065 35.453 39.948 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 [Ne]3s [Ne]3s [Ne]3s 3p [Ne]3s 3p [Ne]3s 3p [Ne]3s 3p [Ne]3s 3p [Ne]3s 3p 5.1391 7.6462 IIIB IVB VB VIB VIIB VIII IB IIB 5.9858 8.1517 10.4867 10.3600 12.9676 15.7596 2 1 2 3 4 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 19 S1/2 20 S0 21 D3/2 22 F2 23 F3/2 24 S3 25 S5/2 26 D4 27 F9/2 28 F4 29 S1/2 30 S0 31 P1/2° 32 P0 33 S3/2° 34 P2 35 P3/2° 36 S0 K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr 4 Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton 39.0983 40.078 44.955910 47.867 50.9415 51.9961 54.938049 55.845 58.933200 58.6934 63.546 65.409 69.723 72.64 74.92160 78.96 79.904 83.798 Period 2 2 2 2 3 2 5 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 10 10 2 10 2 10 2 2 10 2 3 10 2 4 10 2 5 10 2 6 [Ar]4s [Ar]4s [Ar]3d4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s [Ar]3d 4s 4p [Ar]3d 4s 4p [Ar]3d 4s 4p [Ar]3d 4s 4p [Ar]3d 4s 4p [Ar]3d 4s 4p 4.3407 6.1132 6.5615 6.8281 6.7462 6.7665 7.4340 7.9024 7.8810 7.6398 7.7264 9.3942 5.9993 7.8994 9.7886 9.7524 11.8138 13.9996 2 1 2 3 6 7 6 5 4 1 2 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 37 S1/2 38 S0 39 D3/2 40 F2 41 D1/2 42 S3 43 S5/2 44 F5 45 F9/2 46 S0 47 S1/2 48 S0 49 P1/2° 50 P0 51 S3/2° 52 P2 53 P3/2° 54 S0 Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te I Xe 5 Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon 85.4678 87.62 88.90585 91.224 92.90638 95.94 (98) 101.07 102.90550 106.42 107.8682 112.411 114.818 118.710 121.760 127.60 126.90447 131.293 2 2 2 2 4 5 5 2 7 8 10 10 10 2 10 2 10 2 2 10 2 3 10 2 4 10 2 5 10 2 6 [Kr]5s [Kr]5s [Kr]4d5s [Kr]4d 5s [Kr]4d 5s [Kr]4d 5s [Kr]4d 5s [Kr]4d 5s [Kr]4d 5s [Kr]4d [Kr]4d 5s [Kr]4d 5s [Kr]4d 5s 5p [Kr]4d 5s 5p [Kr]4d 5s 5p [Kr]4d 5s 5p [Kr]4d 5s 5p [Kr]4d 5s 5p 4.1771 5.6949 6.2173 6.6339 6.7589 7.0924 7.28 7.3605 7.4589 8.3369 7.5762 8.9938 5.7864 7.3439 8.6084 9.0096 10.4513 12.1298 2 1 3 4 5 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 55 S1/2 56 S0 72 F2 73 F3/2 74 D0 75 S5/2 76 D4 77 F9/2 78 D3 79 S1/2 80 S0 81 P1°/2 82 P0 83 S3°/2 84 P2 85 P3°/2 86 S0 Cs Ba Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn 6 Cesium Barium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon 132.90545 137.327 178.49 180.9479 183.84 186.207 190.23 192.217 195.078 196.96655 200.59 204.3833 207.2 208.98038 (209) (210) (222) 2 14 2 2 14 3 2 14 4 2 14 5 2 14 6 2 14 7 2 14 9 14 10 14 10 2 2 3 4 5 6 [Xe]6s [Xe]6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Xe]4f 5d 6s [Hg]6p [Hg]6p [Hg]6p [Hg]6p [Hg]6p [Hg]6p 3.8939 5.2117 6.8251 7.5496 7.8640 7.8335 8.4382 8.9670 8.9588 9.2255 10.4375 6.1082 7.4167 7.2855 8.414 10.7485 2 1 3 87 S1/2 88 S0 104 F2 ? 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 114 116 Fr Ra Rf Db Sg Bh Hs Mt Uun Uuu Uub Uuq Uuh 7 Francium Radium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Ununnilium Unununium Ununbium Ununquadium Ununhexium (223) (226) (261) (262) (266) (264) (277) (268) (281) (272) (285) (289) (292) 2 14 2 2 [Rn]7s [Rn]7s [Rn]5f 6d 7s ? 4.0727 5.2784 6.0 ? 2 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 Atomic Ground-state s 57 D3/2 58 G°4 59 I9/2° 60 I4 61 H°5/2 62 F0 63 S°7/2 64 D°2 65 H°15/2 66 I8 67 I15/2° 68 H6 69 F°7/2 70 S0 71 D3/2 Number Level e d i n 1 a La Ce Pr Nd Pm Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu h Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Symbol 58 G°4 t n 138.9055 140.116 140.90765 144.24 (145) 150.36 151.964 157.25 158.92534 162.500 164.93032 167.259 168.93421 173.04 174.967 a 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 7 2 9 2 10 2 11 2 12 2 13 2 14 2 14 2 L [Xe]5d6s [Xe]4f5d6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 5d6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 6s [Xe]4f 5d6s Name Ce 5.5769 5.5387 5.473 5.5250 5.582 5.6437 5.6704 6.1498 5.8638 5.9389 6.0215 6.1077 6.1843 6.2542 5.4259 Cerium 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 89 D3/2 90 F2 91 K11/2 92 L°6 93 L11/2 94 F0 95 S7/2° 96 D°2 97 H°15/2 98 I8 99 I15/2° 100 H6 101 F°7/2 102 S0 103 P°1/2? 140.116 s Atomic e † 2 d Weight [Xe]4f5d6s i n Ac Th Pa U Np Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr i 5.5387 t Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium c (227) 232.0381 231.03588 238.02891 (237) (244) (243) (247) (247) (251) (252) (257) (258) (259) (262) A 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 6 2 7 2 7 2 9 2 10 2 11 2 12 2 13 2 14 2 14 2 Ground-state Ionization [Rn]6d7s [Rn]6d 7s [Rn]5f 6d7s [Rn]5f 6d7s [Rn]5f 6d7s [Rn]5f 7s [Rn]5f 7s [Rn]5f 6d7s [Rn]5f 7s [Rn]5f 7s [Rn]5f 7s [Rn]5f 7s [Rn]5f 7s [Rn]5f 7s [Rn]5f 7s 7p? Configuration Energy (eV) 5.17 6.3067 5.89 6.1941 6.2657 6.0260 5.9738 5.9914 6.1979 6.2817 6.42 6.50 6.58 6.65 4.9 ? † Based upon 12C.
Recommended publications
  • Lecture 5. Interstellar Dust: Optical Properties
    Lecture 5. Interstellar Dust: Optical Properties 1. Introduction 2. Extinction 3. Mie Scattering 4. Dust to Gas Ratio 5. Appendices References Spitzer Ch. 7, Osterbrock Ch. 7 DC Whittet, Dust in the Galactic Environment (IoP, 2002) E Krugel, Physics of Interstellar Dust (IoP, 2003) B Draine, ARAA, 41, 241, 2003 1. Introduction: Brief History of Dust Nebular gas long accepted but existence of absorbing interstellar dust controversial. Herschel (1738-1822) found few stars in some directions, later extensively demonstrated by Barnard’s photos of dark clouds. Trumpler (PASP 42 214 1930) conclusively demonstrated interstellar absorption by comparing luminosity distances & angular diameter distances for open clusters: • Angular diameter distances are systematically smaller • Discrepancy grows with distance • Distant clusters are redder • Estimated ~ 2 mag/kpc absorption • Attributed it to Rayleigh scattering by gas Some of the Evidence for Interstellar Dust Extinction (reddening of bright stars, dark clouds) Polarization of starlight Scattering (reflection nebulae) Continuum IR emission Depletion of refractory elements from the gas Dust is also observed in the winds of AGB stars, SNRs, young stellar objects (YSOs), comets, interplanetary Dust particles (IDPs), and in external galaxies. The extinction varies continuously with wavelength and requires macroscopic absorbers (or “dust” particles). Examples of the Effects of Dust Extinction B68 Scattering - Pleiades Extinction: Some Definitions Optical depth, cross section, & efficiency: ext ext ext τ λ = ∫ ndustσ λ ds = σ λ ∫ ndust 2 = πa Qext (λ) Ndust nd is the volumetric dust density The magnitude of the extinction Aλ : ext I(λ) = I0 (λ) exp[−τ λ ] Aλ =−2.5log10 []I(λ)/I0(λ) ext ext = 2.5log10(e)τ λ =1.086τ λ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic and Molecular Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy of Selected Pharmaceuticals
    Article Atomic and Molecular Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy of Selected Pharmaceuticals Pravin Kumar Tiwari 1,2, Nilesh Kumar Rai 3, Rohit Kumar 3, Christian G. Parigger 4 and Awadhesh Kumar Rai 2,* 1 Institute for Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat-382428, India 2 Laser Spectroscopy Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj-211002, India 3 CMP Degree College, Department of Physics, University of Allahabad, Pragyagraj-211002, India 4 Physics and Astronomy Department, University of Tennessee, University of Tennessee Space Institute, Center for Laser Applications, 411 B.H. Goethert Parkway, Tullahoma, TN 37388-9700, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +91-532-2460993 Received: 10 June 2019; Accepted: 10 July 2019; Published: 19 July 2019 Abstract: Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) of pharmaceutical drugs that contain paracetamol was investigated in air and argon atmospheres. The characteristic neutral and ionic spectral lines of various elements and molecular signatures of CN violet and C2 Swan band systems were observed. The relative hardness of all drug samples was measured as well. Principal component analysis, a multivariate method, was applied in the data analysis for demarcation purposes of the drug samples. The CN violet and C2 Swan spectral radiances were investigated for evaluation of a possible correlation of the chemical and molecular structures of the pharmaceuticals. Complementary Raman and Fourier-transform-infrared spectroscopies were used to record the molecular spectra of the drug samples. The application of the above techniques for drug screening are important for the identification and mitigation of drugs that contain additives that may cause adverse side-effects. Keywords: paracetamol; laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; cyanide; carbon swan bands; principal component analysis; Raman spectroscopy; Fourier-transform-infrared spectroscopy 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Essay on Optics
    Essay on Optics by Émilie du Châtelet translated, with notes, by Bryce Gessell published by LICENSE AND CITATION INFORMATION 2019 © Bryce Gessell This work is licensed by the copyright holder under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Published by Project Vox http://projectvox.org How to cite this text: Du Châtelet, Emilie. Essay on Optics. Translated by Bryce Gessell. Project Vox. Durham, NC: Duke University Libraries, 2019. http://projectvox.org/du-chatelet-1706-1749/texts/essay-on-optics This translation is based on the copy of Du Châtelet’s Essai sur l’Optique located in the Universitätsbibliothek Basel (L I a 755, fo. 230–265). The original essay was transcribed and edited in 2017 by Bryce Gessell, Fritz Nagel, and Andrew Janiak, and published on Project Vox (http://projectvox.org/du-chatelet-1706-1749/texts/essai-sur-loptique). 2 This work is governed by a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You may share or adapt the work if you give credit, link to the license, and indicate changes. You may not use the work for commercial purposes. See creativecommons.org for details. CONTENTS License and Citation Information 2 Editor’s Introduction to the Essay and the Translation 4 Essay on Optics Introduction 7 Essay on Optics Chapter 1: On Light 8 Essay on Optics Chapter 2: On Transparent Bodies, and on the Causes of Transparence 11 Essay on Optics Chapter 3: On Opacity, and on Opaque Bodies 28 Essay on Optics Chapter 4: On the Formation of Colors 37 Appendix 1: Figures for Essay on Optics 53 Appendix 2: Daniel II Bernoulli’s Note 55 Appendix 3: Figures from Musschenbroek’s Elementa Physicae (1734) 56 Appendix 4: Figures from Newton’s Principia Mathematica (1726) 59 3 This work is governed by a CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirac Equation - Wikipedia
    Dirac equation - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation Dirac equation From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In particle physics, the Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation derived by British physicist Paul Dirac in 1928. In its free form, or including electromagnetic interactions, it 1 describes all spin-2 massive particles such as electrons and quarks for which parity is a symmetry. It is consistent with both the principles of quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity,[1] and was the first theory to account fully for special relativity in the context of quantum mechanics. It was validated by accounting for the fine details of the hydrogen spectrum in a completely rigorous way. The equation also implied the existence of a new form of matter, antimatter, previously unsuspected and unobserved and which was experimentally confirmed several years later. It also provided a theoretical justification for the introduction of several component wave functions in Pauli's phenomenological theory of spin; the wave functions in the Dirac theory are vectors of four complex numbers (known as bispinors), two of which resemble the Pauli wavefunction in the non-relativistic limit, in contrast to the Schrödinger equation which described wave functions of only one complex value. Moreover, in the limit of zero mass, the Dirac equation reduces to the Weyl equation. Although Dirac did not at first fully appreciate the importance of his results, the entailed explanation of spin as a consequence of the union of quantum mechanics and relativity—and the eventual discovery of the positron—represents one of the great triumphs of theoretical physics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Three Equations: Breit, Eddington-Gaunt, and Two-Body
    View metadata, citation and similarA Tale papers of at Three core.ac.uk Equations: Breit, Eddington-Gaunt, and Two-Body Dirac brought to you by CORE Peter Van Alstine provided by CERN Document Server 12474 Sunny Glenn Drive, Moorpark, Ca. 90125 Horace W. Crater The University of Tennessee Space Institute Tullahoma,Tennessee 37388 G.Breit’s original paper of 1929 postulates the Breit equation as a correction to an earlier defective equation due to Eddington and Gaunt, containing a form of interaction suggested by Heisenberg and Pauli. We observe that manifestly covariant electromagnetic Two-Body Dirac equations previously obtained by us in the framework of Relativistic Constraint Mechanics reproduce the spectral results of the Breit equation but through an interaction structure that contains that of Eddington and Gaunt. By repeating for our equation the analysis that Breit used to demonstrate the superiority of his equation to that of Eddington and Gaunt, we show that the historically unfamiliar interaction structures of Two-Body Dirac equations (in Breit-like form) are just what is needed to correct the covariant Eddington Gaunt equation without resorting to Breit’s version of retardation. 1 I. INTRODUCTION Three score and seven years ago, Gregory Breit extended Dirac’s spin-1/2 wave equation to a system of two charged particles [1]. He formed his equation by summing two free-particle Dirac Hamiltonians with an interaction obtained by substituting Dirac α~’s for velocities in the semi-relativistic electrodynamic interaction of Darwin:. α 1 EΨ= α~ ·p~ +β m +α~ ·p~ +β m − [1 − (α~ · α~ + α~ · r~ˆ α ·rˆ)] Ψ.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Hep-Ph/9412261V1 8 Dec 1994
    IPNO/TH 94-85 How to obtain a covariant Breit type equation from relativistic Constraint Theory J. Mourad Laboratoire de Mod`eles de Physique Math´ematique, Universit´ede Tours, Parc de Grandmont, F-37200 Tours, France H. Sazdjian Division de Physique Th´eorique∗, Institut de Physique Nucl´eaire, Universit´eParis XI, F-91406 Orsay Cedex, France arXiv:hep-ph/9412261v1 8 Dec 1994 October 1994 ∗Unit´ede Recherche des Universit´es Paris 11 et Paris 6 associ´ee au CNRS. 1 Abstract It is shown that, by an appropriate modification of the structure of the interaction po- tential, the Breit equation can be incorporated into a set of two compatible manifestly covariant wave equations, derived from the general rules of Constraint Theory. The com- plementary equation to the covariant Breit type equation determines the evolution law in the relative time variable. The interaction potential can be systematically calculated in perturbation theory from Feynman diagrams. The normalization condition of the Breit wave function is determined. The wave equation is reduced, for general classes of poten- tial, to a single Pauli-Schr¨odinger type equation. As an application of the covariant Breit type equation, we exhibit massless pseudoscalar bound state solutions, corresponding to a particular class of confining potentials. PACS numbers : 03.65.Pm, 11.10.St, 12.39.Ki. 2 1 Introduction Historically, The Breit equation [1] represents the first attempt to describe the relativistic dynamics of two interacting fermion systems. It consists in summing the free Dirac hamiltonians of the two fermions and adding mutual and, eventually, external potentials. This equation, when applied to QED, with one-photon exchange diagram considered in the Coulomb gauge, and solved in the linearized approximation, provides the correct spectra to order α4 [1, 2] for various bound state problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Opacities: Means & Uncertainties
    OPACITIES: MEANS & Previously... UNCERTAINTIES Christopher Fontes Computational Physics Division Los Alamos National Laboratory ICTP-IAEA Advanced School and Workshop on Modern Methods in Plasma Spectroscopy Trieste, March 16-27, 2015 Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Slide 1 Before moving on to the topic of mean opacities, let’s look at Al opacities at different temperatures 19 -3 • Our main example is kT = 40 eV and Ne = 10 cm with <Z> = 10.05 (Li-like ions are dominant) • Consider raising and lowering the temperature: – kT = 400 eV (<Z> = 13.0; fully ionized) – kT = 20 eV (<Z> = 6.1; nitrogen-like stage is dominant) Slide 2 Slide 3 Slide 4 Slide 5 Slide 6 Slide 7 Road map to mean opacities Mean (gray) opacities In order of most to least refined • Under certain conditions, the need to transport a with respect to frequency resolution: frequency-dependent radiation intensity, Iν, can be relaxed in favor of an integrated intensity, I, given by ∞ κν (monochromatic) I = I dν ∫0 ν • Applying this notion of integrated quantities to each term of the radiation transport equation results in a new set of MG κ (multigroup) equations, similar to the original, frequency-dependent formulations • Frequency-dependent absorption terms that formerly (gray) contained will instead contain a suitably averaged κ κν “mean opacity” or “gray opacity” denoted by κ Slide 8 Slide 9 Mean opacities (continued) Types of mean opacities • The mean opacity κ represents, in a single number, the • Two most common types of gray opacities
    [Show full text]
  • Solvable Two-Body Dirac Equation As a Potential Model of Light Mesons?
    Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 4 (2008), 048, 19 pages Solvable Two-Body Dirac Equation as a Potential Model of Light Mesons? Askold DUVIRYAK Institute for Condensed Matter Physics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1 Svientsitskii Str., UA–79011 Lviv, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Received October 29, 2007, in final form May 07, 2008; Published online May 30, 2008 Original article is available at http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/2008/048/ Abstract. The two-body Dirac equation with general local potential is reduced to the pair of ordinary second-order differential equations for radial components of a wave function. The class of linear + Coulomb potentials with complicated spin-angular structure is found, for which the equation is exactly solvable. On this ground a relativistic potential model of light mesons is constructed and the mass spectrum is calculated. It is compared with experimental data. Key words: two body Dirac equation; Dirac oscillator; solvable model; Regge trajectories 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 81Q05; 34A05 1 Introduction It is well known that light meson spectra are structured into Regge trajectories which are approximately linear and degenerated due to a weak dependence of masses of resonances on their spin state. These features are reproduced well within the exactly solvable simple relativistic oscillator model (SROM) [1, 2, 3] describing two Klein–Gordon particles harmonically bound. Actually, mesons consist of quarks, i.e., spin-1/2 constituents. Thus potential models based on the Dirac equation are expected to be more appropriate for mesons spectroscopy. In recent years the two body Dirac equations (2BDE) in different formulations1 with various confining potentials are used as a relativistic constituent quark models [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26].
    [Show full text]
  • Dirac-Exact Relativistic Methods: the Normalized Elimination of the Small Component Method† Dieter Cremer,∗ Wenli Zou and Michael Filatov
    Advanced Review Dirac-exact relativistic methods: the normalized elimination of the small component method† Dieter Cremer,∗ Wenli Zou and Michael Filatov Dirac-exact relativistic methods, i.e., 2- or 1-component methods which exactly reproduce the one-electron energies of the original 4-component Dirac method, have established a standard for reliable relativistic quantum chemical calculations targeting medium- and large-sized molecules. Their development was initiated and facilitated in the late 1990s by Dyall’s development of the normalized elimination of the small component (NESC). Dyall’s work has fostered the conversion of NESC and related (later developed) methods into routinely used, multipurpose Dirac- exact methods by which energies, first-order, and second-order properties can be calculated at computational costs, which are only slightly higher than those of nonrelativistic methods. This review summarizes the development of a generally applicable 1-component NESC algorithm leading to the calculation of reliable energies, geometries, electron density distributions, electric moments, electric field gradients, hyperfine structure constants, contact densities and Mossbauer¨ isomer shifts, nuclear quadrupole coupling constants, vibrational frequencies, infrared intensities, and static electric dipole polarizabilities. In addition, the derivation and computational possibilities of 2-component NESC methods are discussed and their use for the calculation of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) effects in connection with spin-orbit splittings and SOC-corrected
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Astronomy
    Edition of 2013 HANDBOOK ON RADIO ASTRONOMY International Telecommunication Union Sales and Marketing Division Place des Nations *38650* CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Fax: +41 22 730 5194 Printed in Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 730 6141 Geneva, 2013 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 978-92-61-14481-4 Edition of 2013 Web: www.itu.int/publications Photo credit: ATCA David Smyth HANDBOOK ON RADIO ASTRONOMY Radiocommunication Bureau Handbook on Radio Astronomy Third Edition EDITION OF 2013 RADIOCOMMUNICATION BUREAU Cover photo: Six identical 22-m antennas make up CSIRO's Australia Telescope Compact Array, an earth-rotation synthesis telescope located at the Paul Wild Observatory. Credit: David Smyth. ITU 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. - iii - Introduction to the third edition by the Chairman of ITU-R Working Party 7D (Radio Astronomy) It is an honour and privilege to present the third edition of the Handbook – Radio Astronomy, and I do so with great pleasure. The Handbook is not intended as a source book on radio astronomy, but is concerned principally with those aspects of radio astronomy that are relevant to frequency coordination, that is, the management of radio spectrum usage in order to minimize interference between radiocommunication services. Radio astronomy does not involve the transmission of radiowaves in the frequency bands allocated for its operation, and cannot cause harmful interference to other services. On the other hand, the received cosmic signals are usually extremely weak, and transmissions of other services can interfere with such signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Spectroscopy
    Atomic Spectroscopy Reference Books: 1) Analytical Chemistry by Gary D. Christian 2) Principles of instrumental Analysis by Skoog, Holler, Crouch 3) Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry by Skoog 4) Basic Concepts of analytical Chemistry by S. M. Khopkar We consider two types of optical atomic spectrometric methods that use similar techniques for sample introduction and atomization. The first is atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), which for half a century has been the most widely used method for the determination of single elements in analytical samples. The second is atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS), which since the mid-1960s has been studied extensively. By contrast to the absorption method, atomic fluorescence has not gained widespread general use for routine elemental analysis. Thus, although several instrument makers have in recent years begun to offer special- purpose atomic fluorescence spectrometers, the vast majority of instruments are still of the atomic absorption type. Sample Atomization Techniques We first describe the two most common methods of sample atomization encountered in AAS and AFS, flame atomization, and electrothermal atomization. We then turn to three specialized atomization procedures used in both types of spectrometry. Flame Atomization In a flame atomizer, a solution of the sample is nebulized by a flow of gaseous oxidant, mixed with a gaseous fuel, and carried into a flame where atomization occurs. As shown in Figure, a complex set of interconnected processes then occur in the flame. The first step is desolvation, in which the solvent evaporates to produce a finely divided solid molecular aerosol. The aerosol is then volatilized to form gaseous molecules. Dissociation of most of these molecules produces an atomic gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Eigenvalues of the Breit Equation
    Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013, 063B03 (13 pages) DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptt041 Eigenvalues of the Breit equation Yoshio Yamaguchi1,† and Hikoya Kasari2,∗ 1Nishina Center, RIKEN, 350-0198 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, Japan 2Department of Physics, School of Science, Tokai University 259-1292 4-1-1 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan ∗E-mail: [email protected] Received January 9, 2013; Accepted April 12, 2013; Published June 1, 2013 ............................................................................... Eigenvalues of the Breit equation Downloaded from e2 (α p + β m)αα δββ + δαα (−α p + β M)ββ − δαα δββ αβ = Eαβ , 1 1 2 2 r in which only the static Coulomb potential is considered, have been found. Here a detailed 1 discussion of the simple cases, S0, m = M, and m = M, is given, deriving the exact energy eigenvalues. An α2 expansion is used to find radial wave functions. The leading term is given by http://ptep.oxfordjournals.org/ the classical Coulomb wave function. The technique used here can be applied to other cases. ............................................................................... Subject Index B87 1. Introduction and the Breit equation at CERN LIBRARY on June 21, 2013 1.1. Introduction The Breit equation [1–3] has traditionally [4] been considered to be singular, and no attempt has ever been made to solve it. Instead, the Pauli approximation or a generalized Foldy–Wouthuysen trans- formation has been applied to derive the effective Hamiltonian Heff, consisting of the Schrödinger Hamiltonian 1 1 1 e2 H =− + p2 − 0 2 m M r and many other relativistic correction terms [4–6]. The perturbation method was then used to evaluate the eigenvalues (binding energies) in a power series with α as high as possible (or as high as necessary for experimental verification of quantum electrodynamics).
    [Show full text]