DOCSLIB.ORG

Elte Law Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Law_journal_1hasab_:press 2014.02.20. 15:35 Page 1 ELTE LAW JOURNAL 2013/1 ELTE LJ Budapest, 2014 Law_journal_1hasab_:press 2014.02.20. 15:35 Page 2 This issue was published with the support of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. ELTE Law Journal, published twice a year under the auspices of ELTE Faculty of Law since 2013 President of the Editorial Board • Miklós Király Editor in Chief • Ádám Fuglinszky Editors • Balázs J. Gellér (Criminal Law) • Attila Menyhárd (Private Law) • Pál Sonnevend (Public International Law and European Public Law) • Réka Somssich (Private International law and European Commercial Law) • István Varga (Dispute Resolution) • Attila Vincze (Constitutional and Administrative Law) Advisory Board • Armin von Bogdandy (Heidelberg) • Adrian Briggs (Oxford) • Marcin Czepelak (Krakow) • Bénédicte Fauvarque-Cosson (Paris) • Erik Jayme (Heidelberg) • Herbert Küpper (Regensburg) • Ulrich Magnus (Hamburg) • Russel Miller (Lexington, Va) • Olivier Moreteau (Baton Rouge, LA) • Marianna Muravyeva (Oxford) • Ken Oliphant (Bristol) • Helmut Rüssmann (Saarbrücken) • Luboš Tichy (Prague) • Emőd Veress (Kolozsvár/Cluj) • Reinhard Zimmermann (Hamburg) Contact • [email protected] Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Law • 1053 Budapest, Egyetem tér 1-3, Hungary For submission check out our submission guide at www.eltelawjournal.hu All rights reserved. Material on these pages is copyright of Eötvös University Press or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be used for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way or transmitted to others (unless explicitly stated otherwise) without the written permission of Eötvös University Press. Recommended abbreviation for citations: ELTE LJ ISSN 2064 4965 Editorial work • Eötvös University Press 1053 Budapest, Királyi Pál utca 18, Hungary www.eotvoskiado.hu Executive Publisher: András Hunyady, ELTE Eötvös University Press Layout: Tibor Anders Cover: Ildikó Csele Kmotrik Printed by: Multisztolg Bt. Law_journal_1hasab_:press 2014.02.20. 15:35 Page 3 Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................5 Nóra Chronowski – Erzsébet Csatlós Judicial Dialogue or National Monologue? The International Law and Hungarian Courts ................................................................................7 Balázs J. Gellér Some Thoughts on the Changing Faces of Human Dignity in Criminal Law ........................29 András Koltay Elements of Protecting the Reputation of Public Figures in European Legal Systems ........53 Helmut Koziol Harmonising Tort Law in the European Union: Advantages and Difficulties........................73 Kurt Siehr Unidroit Convention of 1995 and Unclaimed Cultural Property without Provenance........89 Kinga Timár The Legal Relationship between the Parties and the Arbitral Institution ............................103 Law_journal_1hasab_:press 2014.02.20. 15:35 Page 4 Law_journal_1hasab_:press 2014.02.20. 15:35 Page 5 Contents Foreword When we try to sketch the intellectual coordinate system of our new legal periodical, ELTE Law Journal, several important dates may come into our mind, especially 1667, 1990 and 2004. The Faculty of Law of Eötvös Loránd University was established in 1667, almost 350 years ago. This is the oldest institution of this kind in Hungary and has preserved its leading role and academic excellence over the centuries. No other Hungarian Faculty of Law has a longer uninterrupted record, and it ranks well among the most venerable of Central Europe’s law schools in terms of distinction. This is the tradition and legacy which certainly determines our work in the future too. In 1990, the collapse of communist dictatorship and the former socialist block, the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, the crisis in the state-controlled economy and the regained freedom created not only a new political and economic situation in Hungary but also brought new legal challenges: the historic task of creating a firm system of rule of law and providing the modern legal infrastructure for a smoothly functioning market economy. The first part of this mission was completed; the “revolution through law” – as the late President of the Republic, Ferenc Mádl, referred to the sweeping changes – was successful. However, the fine-tuning and maintenance of this system requires further attention and independent reflection from scholars as well. As the classical proverb warns us, eternal vigilance is the price of freedom. As a result of the transition, the European dream has come true as well. In 2004 – after long years of careful preparation – Hungary voluntarily joined the European Union. The tide of EU rules has reached the Hungarian legal system - even beyond the impact of the approximation of laws in the EU. Hungarian law has to be interpreted very often in the context of European rules. These dates – 1667, 1990, 2004 – and the related events clearly symbolise our main goals: launching a new legal periodical which is based on the tradition and outstanding quality of our University, offering a forum for studies reflecting the problems of contemporary law in modern democracies and devoting special attention to the European and international dimension of legal development. In other words, ELTE Law Journal sets out to contribute to the free movement of legal ideas in the European legal space and to support the full re-integration of Hungarian legal science into the mainstream of legal thinking. The establishment of ELTE Law Journal is part of a broader strategy of internationalisation, too. Our Faculty maintains wide-ranging international relations, primarily with universities in Europe, and is proud to be involved in educational and research projects with similar institutions abroad. In recent years we have placed special emphasis on consolidating ties with universities in neighbouring countries to promote intensive regional cooperation in legal education. We are proud to announce that in September 2013 the Faculty launched Hungary’s first LL.M. programme in European and International Business Law. These efforts are backed by a new generation of colleagues at our Faculty, many of whom completed their PhD or LL.M abroad. 5 Law_journal_1hasab_:press 2014.02.20. 15:35 Page 6 ELTE LAW JOURNAL • FOREWORD Remembering the incipient stage of this journal, and the months and days filled with many challenges, the Editorial Board would like to express its special thanks to Diána Mecsi, Krisztina Stump and Balázs Tőkey for their commitment to their work that proved invaluable to the Editor in Chief. The very first issue of ELTE Law Journal starts strongly, publishing papers with a characteristic cross-border approach: Balázs J. Gellér presents his thoughts on the changing faces of human dignity in criminal law in a comparative study. Helmut Koziol offers a paper on harmonising tort law in the European Union, while Kurt Siehr has written on the Unidroit Convention of 1995 and unclaimed cultural property without provenance. Both professors are honorary doctors and professors of Eötvös Loránd University. Nóra Chronowski and Erzsébet Csatlós meditate on the interface between International Law and Hungarian courts, András Koltay delivers an analysis on protecting the reputation of public figures in the European legal systems and our young colleague Kinga Timár reviews a number of arbitration laws and rules while investigating the relationship between the parties and arbitral institutions. With the abundant wealth of legal ideas reflected by this short overview, the editors launch ELTE Law Journal, asking for the benign interest and support of our dear readers. Budapest, 6 December, 2013. Ádám Fuglinszky Miklós Király István Varga Editor in Chief President of the Editorial Board Editor Dean of ELTE Faculty of Law Vice Dean for Scientific Affairs 6 Law_journal_1hasab_:press 2014.02.20. 15:35 Page 7 Contents Nóra Chronowski* – Erzsébet Csatlós** Judicial Dialogue or National Monologue? The International Law and Hungarian Courts*** I Introduction The focus of this study is the application of international law by the Hungarian Constitutional Court and ordinary courts. The purpose of the paper is to reveal whether there is any judicial dialogue or just a national monologue in this field. To achieve this aim, after an overview of the constitutional and legal framework (II), the application of the international treaties (III), international customary law and other sources of international law (IV) will be analysed, and also the interpretation of domestic law in the light of international obligations will be investigated (V) with special regard to ‘judicial dialogue’ (VI). The importance of the question is underpinned by the fact that the Hungarian constitutional system has been – again – in transition since 2010 and the common standards of the international community – such as rule of law, protection of fundamental rights and democracy – seem to be at risk because of the permanent revision and changes of legal norms, amendments to the constitution and legal uncertainty. However, it may be presupposed that the judicial practice on the application of international law and the judicial dialogue with international courts could balance the aforementioned process, if judges are aware of its significance and are open to international law. Common values of the European constitutional states governed by the rule of law are enshrined in international
Recommended publications
  • The Fundamentals of Hungarian Private Law

    The Fundamentals of Hungarian Private Law

    UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCES Department of Private Law ____________________________________________________________________ THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HUNGARIAN PRIVATE LAW Edited by JÓZSEF BENKE THIS WORK WAS SUPPORTED BY PROJECT NO. EFOP-3.4.3-16-2016-00005 ISBN 978-963-429-484-9 (PDF) PÉCS 2020 2 SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS BENKE, JÓZSEF: THE GENERAL PART OF HUNGARIAN PRIVATE LAW (HISTORICAL AND DOCTRINAL FOUNDATIONS) 1. A CONCISE HISTORY OF HUNGARIAN PRIVATE LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE 2. BASIC DOCTRINES OF HUNGARIAN PRIVATE LAW NOCHTA, TIBOR: FUNDAMENTALS OF THE LAW OF PERSONS 1. GENERAL RULES OF LEGAL PERSONS 2. THE RULES OF PARTICULAR LEGAL PERSONS BENKE, JÓZSEF: FUNDAMENTALS OF LAW OF RIGHTS IN REM 1. GENERAL PART 1.1. The Doctrine of Norms of the ‘Law of Rights In Rem’ 1.2. The Doctrine of In Rem Legal Relationships 2. SPECIAL PART 2.1. The Law of Possession 2.2. The Law of Ownership Rights 2.3. The Law of Limited Rights In Rem 2.4. The Law of Public Registers of Rights In Rem CHAPTERS FROM THE LAW OF OBLIGATIONS I. BENKE, JÓZSEF: Basic Issues of Obligation and Law of Obligations II. MOHAI, MÁTÉ: Settlement of the Obligation III. FABÓ, TIBOR: The Formation of contracts IV. BÉRCESI, ZOLTÁN—HARCI-KOVÁCS, KOLOS: Invalidity of the Contracts V. BENKE, JÓZSEF: Ineffectiveness of Contracts VI. MOHAI, MÁTÉ: Performance of the Contract VII. NOCHTA, TIBOR: Breach of Contract VIII. FABÓ, TIBOR: Confirmation of Contract IX. FABÓ, TIBOR: Contracts Transferring Ownership Rights X. NOCHTA, TIBOR: Contracts for Professional Services XI. FABÓ, TIBOR: Contracts of Carriage XII.
  • The Right to Resist in the World's Constitutions Tom Ginsburg

    The Right to Resist in the World's Constitutions Tom Ginsburg

    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers Working Papers 2012 When to Overthrow Your Government: The Right to Resist in the World's Constitutions Tom Ginsburg Daniel Lansberg-Rodriguez Mila Versteeg Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ public_law_and_legal_theory Part of the Law Commons Chicago Unbound includes both works in progress and final versions of articles. Please be aware that a more recent version of this article may be available on Chicago Unbound, SSRN or elsewhere. Recommended Citation Tom Ginsburg, Daniel Lansberg-Rodriguez & Mila Versteeg, "When to Overthrow Your Government: The Right to Resist in the World's Constitutions" (University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 406, 2012). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Working Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. When to Overthrow your Government: The Right to Resist in the World’s Constitutions Tom Ginsburg Daniel Lansberg-Rodriguez Mila Versteeg UCLA LAW REVIEW UCLA LAW ABSTRACT An On December 17, 2010, a young Tunisian street vendor protesting an abusive police o!cial set o" a wave of democratic uprisings throughout the Arab world. In rising up against their governments, the peoples of the Arab countries were confronting an age-old problem in political theory: When is it acceptable to rise up against an unjust authority? #is question is not only of great importance to the peoples of the Middle East today but was also of profound interest to the American founders and, through them, has informed the very basis of modern constitutionalism.
  • Filling Lacunae by Judicial Engagement with Constitutional Values and Comparative Methods

    Filling Lacunae by Judicial Engagement with Constitutional Values and Comparative Methods

    Filling Lacunae by Judicial Engagement with Constitutional Values and Comparative Methods Francois Venter* One’s understanding of what a legal lacuna is will be determined by one’s understanding of how the law works. Before coming to gap-filling by means of constitutional interpretation, attention will be drawn to the questions what a lacuna is, when they are filled and if interpretation amounts to gap-filling. Adjudication in legal orders operating under supreme constitutions (recently exponentially growing in numbers) is often associated with creative problem solving. Two important instruments used by constitutional courts for the resolution of the issues requiring adjudication are constitutionalized values and comparative consideration of foreign and international law. The use of these instruments in the process of the filling of lacunae by courts with the authority to determine the meaning and implications of supreme constitutions is the theme of this Article. I. THE PHENOMENON “LACUNA” .......................................................... 79 II. CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION AS GAP-FILLING....................... 83 III. CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES AS INTERPRETATIVE TOOLS ................... 88 IV. CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON AS INTERPRETATIVE TOOL ............ 93 V. CONCLUSION: THE VALUE OF CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES AND COMPARISON IN THE PROCESS OF FILLING LACUNAE ............... 99 I. THE PHENOMENON “LACUNA” The law deals with the social and individual life of human beings, a very complex affair, not least because it is in constant flux, evolving for many reasons, some of which relate to the ever-changing circumstances surrounding the human condition. The law simply cannot provide for every eventuality and, thankfully one might say, is not intended to do so. By definition the law therefore occasionally exhibits a casus omissus, deficiencies, inadequacies, incompleteness, open territory, voids, lacunae—that has been the case for centuries and should remain so.
  • Session 4: Constitution, Fundamental Rights and Law of Enforcement

    Session 4: Constitution, Fundamental Rights and Law of Enforcement

    Session 4: Constitution, Fundamental Rights and Law of Enforcement 4.2. The Conflicts between the Fundamental Rights of the Creditor and the Debtor General Reporter Prof. Á lvaro PEREZ-RAGONE, University of Cologne, Germany and LL.M., Civil Procedure Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile National Reporters (* Speaker) National Report: Argentina - Prof. Eduardo OTEIZA, Derecho Procesal Universidad de la Plata, Argentina National Report: Australia - William VAN_CAENEGEM and Kim WEINERT. Bond University National Report: Brasil- Prof. Luiz Guilherme MARINONI*, Sérgio Cruz ARENHART AND Gustavo OSNA , Procedural Law Universidad Federal de Paraná, Curitiba, Brasil National Report: Chile- Prof. Maite AGUIRREZÁ BAL, University Los Andes and Macarena VARGAS, Profesor University Diego Portales, Chile National Report: China - Fu YULIN*. Peking University Law School, Cao ZHIXUN. Ph.D. Candidate, Peking University Law School and Han JINGRU. Ph.D. Candidate, Peking University Law School, China National Report: Colombia- Prof. Jairo PARRA QUIJANO, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Colombia National Report: Croatia- Alan UZELAC. Chair Civil Procedure Law, Zagreb University, Croatia National Report: England - Prof. Neil ANDREWS, Profesor University of Cambridge, England National Report: France - Prof. Emmanuel JEULAND, University Paris 1, La Soborne, France National Report: Philippines - Prof. Pedro José F. BERNARDO. Partner, Kelvin Chia Partnership Adjunct Professor of Law, Ateneo Law School, Philippines National Report: Finland - Prof. Laura ERVO*. Professor of procedural law, University of Ö rebro, Sweden. Docent (Adjunct Professor) in procedural law at the Finnish Universities of Turku, Helsinki and Eastern Finland National Report: Germany (two national Reports) - Prof. Christoph A. KERN, Private and Procedural Law University of Lausanne and University of Heidelberg and Nikolaj A.
  • The Significance of the Rule of Law and Its Implications for the European Union and the United States

    The Significance of the Rule of Law and Its Implications for the European Union and the United States

    THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RULE OF LAW AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES Ricardo Gosalbo-Bono* Table of Contents Introduction............................................... 231 The Rule of Law in Domestic Law............................. 232 I. The Common European and American Heritage. 232 II. The Differing National Conceptions in Europe. 240 (i) The German Rechtsstaat............................ 241 (ii) The French Etat de Droit............................ 246 (iii) The English Rule of Law............................ 251 (iv) The supranational pan-European concept. 259 (a) The Rule of Law in the European Union. 259 (b) The Rule of Law under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights. 269 (c) Assessment: The Added Value of the Pan-European Rule of Law. ................................ 271 III. The Rule of Law in American Law. 272 (i) The Natural Rights of Man.......................... 272 (ii) Due Process under the Fifth Amendment. 274 (iii) Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment. 276 (iv) The Supreme Court as the guarantor of the American Rule of Law.......................................... 278 IV. The Rule of Law in China and the Rest of Asia.. 280 V. The Socialist Rule of Law. .............................. 284 VI. The Rule of Law in Islam................................ 285 VII. The Rule of Law in Latin America and Africa.. 287 VIII. Elements for a Universal Definition of the Rule of Law. 288 The Rule of Law in International Law.. 290 * Director, Legal Service, Council of the European Union, Professor of Law, Free University Brussels (VUB), Doctor of Laws (Spain), PhD (Cantab). The opinions expressed and the approach taken in this paper are personal to the author and in no way do they reflect the position of or engage the Legal Service of the Council or the Council itself.
  • Socialism and Legal History

    Socialism and Legal History

    Routledge Research in Legal History SOCIALISM AND LEGAL HISTORY THE HISTORIES AND HISTORIANS OF LAW IN SOCIALIST EAST CENTRAL EUROPE Edited by Ville Erkkilä and Hans-Peter Haferkamp Socialism and Legal History This book focuses on the way in which legal historians and legal scientists used the past to legitimize, challenge and explain the socialist legal orders, which were backed by dictatorial governments. The volume studies legal historians and legal histories written in Eastern European countries during the socialist era after the Second World War. The book investigates whether there was a unified form of socialist legal historiography and, if so, what can be said of its common features. The individual chapters of this volume concentrate on the regimes that are situated between the Russian, and later Soviet, legal culture and the area covered by the German Civil Code. Hence, the geographical focus of the book is on East Germany, Russia, the Baltic states, Poland, and Hungary. The approach is transnational, focusing on the interaction and intertwinement of the then hegemonic communist ideology and the ideas of law and justice as they appeared in the writings of legal historians of the socialist legal orders. Such an angle enables concentration on the dynamics between politics and law as well as identities and legal history. Studying the socialist interpretations of legal history reveals the ways in which legal scholars, situated between legal renewal and political guidance, gave legitimacy to, struggled to come to terms with, and sketched the future of the socialist legal orders. The book will be a valuable resource for academics and researchers working in the areas of legal history, jurisprudence, philosophy of law and European Studies.
  • Comparison on the Rights, Limitations and Procedures Related to Public Gatherings and Demonstrations Across Europe

    Comparison on the Rights, Limitations and Procedures Related to Public Gatherings and Demonstrations Across Europe

    COMPARISON ON THE RIGHTS, LIMITATIONS AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO PUBLIC GATHERINGS AND DEMONSTRATIONS ACross EUROPE prepared for THE HELSINKI COMMITTEE (APADOR-CH) THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND EXPRESSION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE .............................................................03 – 05 AUSTRIA ............................................................................................................................................................... 06 – 08 CZECH REPUBLIC ..............................................................................................................................................09 – 11 FRANCE .................................................................................................................................................................12 – 15 GERMANY .............................................................................................................................................................16 – 20 HUNGARY.............................................................................................................................................................21 – 23 ITALY .......................................................................................................................................................................24 – 27 POLAND ................................................................................................................................................................28 – 31 SPAIN ......................................................................................................................................................................32
  • State of the Rule of Law in the European Union Reports From

    State of the Rule of Law in the European Union Reports From

    State of the rule of law in the European Union Reports from National Human Rights Institutions 2021 ennhri.org @ennhri ENNHRI 1 Table of contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Overview of trends and challenges ............................................................................................. 22 Further strengthening EU and national rule of law and human rights frameworks through NHRIs’ engagement: Key Recommendations to the EU .......................................40 Country reports ................................................................................................................................ 50 Austria ...........................................................................................................................................................50 Belgium ........................................................................................................................................................53 Bulgaria ........................................................................................................................................................63 Croatia .......................................................................................................................................................... 76 Cyprus