A QIP Course on Technology: Smart Grid Protocols

Ankush Sharma Assistant Professor Dept. of EE, IIT Kanpur E-mail: [email protected] Contents

Various Smart Grid Protocols

IEC 61850 Protocol

Tele-Control Protocols

DLMS/COSEM Protocols Smart Grid Protocols and Standards

- IEEE C37.118:IEEE Standard for Synchrophasor - IEC 61850: Power Utility Automation Measurements for Power Systems - IEC 61968: Common Information Model (CIM) / - IEC 61970: Common Information Model (CIM) / Distribution Management Energy Management - IEC 62056: Data exchange for meter reading, - IEC 60870-6: Inter-Control Center tariff and load control Communications Protocol - DNP 3.0: Interoperability between substation - IEC 60870-5-104: Network access for IEC 60870- computers, RTUs, IEDs and master stations 5-101 using standard transport profiles

Major Smart Grid Protocols/ Standards

- IEC 62351: Security - IEC 62325: Deregulated energy market communications standards - IEC 61508: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/ programmable electronic - AS 4777: Grid connection of energy systems safety-related systems via inverters - IEEE 1588: Standard for a Precision Clock - AS 4577: Framework for the control of electrical Synchronization Protocol for Networked devices for DRM Measurement and Control Systems Smart Grid Protocols and Standards

Other Smart Grid Protocols/ Standards –

Green Button - Initiative to provide utility customers with easy and secure access to their energy usage information in a consumer-friendly and computer-friendly format

MultiSpeak -The specification is a standard for the exchange of data among enterprise application software commonly applied in utilities

SunSpec - Open interoperability specifications and information models to achieve plug-and-play interoperability between Distributed Energy Resource (DER) components and smart grid applications

SEP 2.0 - Standard for applications that enable home energy management via wired and wireless devices that support Protocol IEC 61850 IEC 61850 Before IEC 61850 -  Power substations were mostly managed by substation automation systems that -  Utilize simple, straightforward and highly specialized communication protocols  Less concerned about the semantics of the exchanged data  Devices from different manufacturers used different substation automation protocols, disabling them to talk to each other  Utilities were paying enormous money and time to configure the devices to work together in a substation  Hence, device manufacturers recognized the need for a unified international standard to support seamless cooperation among products from different vendors  The IEC 61850 international standard, drafted by substation automation domain experts from 22 countries IEC 61850

 Takes advantage of a comprehensive object-oriented data model and the technology  Part 1 to Part 3 - general ideas about the standard  Part 4 – defining the project and management requirements in an IEC 61850 enabled substation  Part 5 - specifying the required parameters for physical implementation  Part 6 - defining an XML based language for IED configuration  Part 7 - elaborating on the logical concepts  Part 8 – mapping of the internal objects to the presentation layer and to the Ethernet link layer  Part 9 - mapping from sampled measurement value (SMV) to point-to-point Ethernet IEC 61850 – Substation Architecture

IEC 61850 based Substation Architecture IEC 61850 – System Overview

Source: ABB IEC 61850 - Virtualization

Logical Representation of Device in IEC 61850- IEC 61850 – Object Naming

Anatomy of an IEC61850 Object Name

V A Functional Constraint MX MX

Logical Nodes

MMXU1 MMXU2

Logical Device (e.g. Relay1)

“MMXU2$MX$A” = Physical Device Feeder #2 Current Measurements (network address) IEC 61850 – Object Naming Logical node groups

M Metering and measurement L System LN S Sensor and monitoring P Protection X Switchgear R Protection related T Instrument transformers C Control Y Power transformers G Generic Z Further power system I Interfacing and archiving equipment Examples:A Automatic control (4) PDIF: Differential protection CSWI: Switch controller RBRF: Breaker failure MMXU: Measurement unit XCBR: Circuit breaker YPTR: Power transformer IEC 61850 – Communication Profile IEC 61850 Communication Profile Domain Application Stack Communication Communication IEC 61850 – Communication Profile IEC 61850 Communication

Source: ABB IEC 61850 Interface Model

Source: ABB IEC 61850 - ACSI

Abstract Communications Service Interface - ACSI

 Defines a set of Objects

 Defines a set of Services to manipulate and access those objects

 Defines a base set of data types for describing objects

 Example ACSI services – GetDataSetValue, CreateDataSet, DetDataDirectory IEC 61850 - SMV Sampled Measured Values (SMV) IEC 61850 - GOOSE IEC61850 Generic Object Oriented Substation Event - GOOSE

 Device to multi-device GOOSE Header: communication – Local or Wide Area • Multicast Address • Name  Bridgeable but Non-routable • Time Until Next GOOSE  User-defined Dataset sent in an Ethernet Multicast message • Etc.  Message sent on change of state as well periodically to enable detection of device failure User-Defined Dataset  Reliability effected through message • Status Information repeat • Analog Values • Data Quality • Time IEC 61850 – GOOSE Messaging IEC 61850 – GSSE/MMS

Generic Substation State Events (GSSE)  Only Status data can be exchanged through GSSE and it uses a status list (string of bits) rather than a dataset as is used in GOOSE  GSSE messages are transmitted directly over IEC/ISO 8802-2 and 8802-3 (IEEE 802.3) using a similar mechanism to GOOSE messages  As the GSSE format is simpler than GOOSE it is handled faster in some devices.  GSSE is being progressively superseded by the use of GOOSE and support for it may eventually disappear Manufacturing Message Specification (MMS) It is a messaging system for transferring real time process data and supervisory control information between networked devices and/or computer applications. MMS Defines the following -  A set of standard objects which must exist in every device, on which operations like read, write, event signaling etc. can be executed.  A set of standard messages exchanged between a client and a server stations for the purpose of monitoring and/or controlling these objects.  A set of encoding rules for mapping these messages to bits and bytes when transmitted. IEC 61850 - SCL SCL – Substation Configuration Language

 Description language for communication in electrical substations related to the IEDs

 XML based language that allows a formal description of - – Substation automation system and the switchyard and the relation between them – IED configuration – IEC 61850 language used in the XML files is called SCL language IEC 61850 - SCL SCL File Types

SSD: System Specification Description.  XML description of the entire system. SCD: Substation Configuration Description.  XML description of a single substation. ICD: IED Capability Description.  XML description of items supported by an IED. CID: Configured IED Description.  XML configuration for a specific IED. IEC 61850 - SCL SCL File Sample

SSD: System Specification Description.  XML description of the entire system. SCD: Substation Configuration Description.  XML description of a single substation. ICD: IED Capability Description.  XML description of items supported by an IED. CID: Configured IED Description.  XML configuration for a specific IED. IEC 61850: The SCL language (IED Modelling) IEC 61850: The SCL language (IED modelling)

SCL Bay A Bay Unit (IED)

PTRC (Trip, Operate) IEC 61850: The SCL language (IED modelling) SCL SCL It is possible to “structure” the Logical Nodes, and group them under different Logical Devices. The “rules” of this structure are described in the XML file. IEC 61850: Services (IED modelling) The SCL file also describes what the IED can do (services). In this case it seems that the IED cannot offer upload of disturbance recorder file, as the “FileHandling Service” is not listed:

While this IED allows to upload the disturbance recorder files (FileHandling Service” is listed): IEC 61850 - CID CID File Generation IEC 61850 - CID CID File Generation IEC 61850 - SSD SSD File IEC 61850-90-5: Mapping with C37.118 IEC 61850-90-5: Mapping with C37.118 IEC 61850 Benefits of IEC 61850

• IEC 61850 normally uses the approach of common information model (CIM) of real devices in terms of logical nodes (LN) for standardization • High‐level services enable self‐describing devices & automatic object discovery saving money and effort in configuration and maintenance • Standardized naming conventions with power system context eliminates device dependencies and tag mapping • Standardized configuration file formats enables seamless exchange of device configuration • Higher performance multi‐cast messaging for inter‐relay communications enables functions not possible with hard wires • Multi‐cast messaging enables sharing of transducer (CT/PT) signals Tele‐Control Protocols Tele-Control Protocols for SCADA

 IEC 60870‐5‐101 protocol (Serial mode communication from RTU to Control Center)

 IEC 60870‐5‐104 protocol (network mode communication from RTU to Control Center)

 IEC 60870‐6‐502 ( ICCP) protocol (between two Control Canters)

 IEC 60870‐5‐103 protocol (for communication between IEDs in a Substation)

 DNP 3.0 Protocol (Serial)

 DNP 3.0 Protocol (TCP/IP) Communication Channel for Information flow

RLDC

Wide Band Commn (MW / FO) SLDC SLDC Wide Band Commn

Area-LDC Area-LDC Wide Band / PLCC Commn

RTU RTU RTU Three of the most important part of a SCADA system: Master Station, Remote Terminal (RTU, PLC, IED), and communication between them

Remote Terminal Unit

 A microprocessor‐controlled electronic device that interfaces objects in the physical world to an SCADA system

 Transmits telemetry data to a master SCADA system, and control connected objects based on SCADA Command.

 SCADA master station gets status of a certain circuit breaker from the mapped status point of an RTU.

 SCADA protocols consist of two message sets or pairs –

 Master protocol, containing the valid statements for master station initiation or response

 RTU protocol, containing the valid statements an RTU can initiate and respond to

 the message pairs are considered a poll or request for information exchange RTU Dataflow RTU Communication

 Standard polling The master station continuously requests the real‐time data values.  Exception reporting The RTU is polled but only reports values that have changed since the prior poll  Push Communications The RTU initiates messages on an event or time basis.  Peer to peer communications RTUs can communicate with the master station and also with each other if there is a communication path. RTU Connectivity Options

LAN-B Normal RTU LAN-B Critical RTU

LAN-A LAN-A

CFE CFE CFE CFE

S M M M

M M M

RTU RTU IEC 60870-5 Protocol

 Based on the reduced communication reference model called Enhanced Performance Architecture (EPA)  Companion standards IEC 60870‐5‐101 and IEC 60870‐5‐104 are derived from the IEC 60870‐5 protocol standard definition  EPA includes three layers of the OSI model –   Data Link layer  Physical layer 101 104

* The ITU ( International Telecommunication Union ) Telecommunication Standardization (ITU-T) Protocol Structure 7‐Layer 3‐Layer

Application Application Presentation Session Transport Network Data Link Data Link Physical Physical OSI EPA

Reason for 3‐Layered Structure of EPA ‐ 1) Short Reaction Time 2) Reduced Transmission Bandwidth IEC 60870-5-101

 Supports unbalanced (master initiated message) & balanced (master/slave initiated message) modes of data transfer  supports point‐to‐point and multidrop communication links carrying serial‐bit low‐bandwidth data communications  Link address and application service data unit (ASDU) addresses are provided for classifying the end station and sectors under same n/w  Data is classified into different information objects and each information object is provided with a specific address  Facility to classify the data into high priority (class‐1) and low priority (class‐2) and transfer the same using separate mechanisms  Possibility of classifying the data into different groups (1‐16) to get the data according to the group by issuing specific group interrogation commands from the master  Cyclic & Spontaneous data updating schemes are provided  Facility for time synchronization schemes for transfer of files IEC 60870-5-101 Layers Physical Layer : Data Link Layer Information (data) bit : 8 bit Standard Frame Format : FT 1.2 (frame format Start bit:1 , Stop bit : 1 of IEC 101 which is suitable for asynchronous communication) Parity bit : Even Data Transmission at Link Layer ( Station address field Length : 1 or 2 bytes ) Unbalanced Mode : Transmitted messages are categorized on two priority classes( Class 1 & Class 2 ) Balanced Mode : All the messages are sent, No categorization of Class 1 and Class 2 Network Layer : Not defined as 870‐5‐101 as it is not IP based

Application Layer Selection of ASDUs ASDU 1 : Single point information Length of header fields of data structure are: ASDU 2 : Single point information with time tag ASDU 3 : Double point information ‐ Station address 1 or 2 byte ( User defined ) ASDU 4 : Double point information with time tag ASDU 9 : Measured value, Normalized value ‐ ASDU Address : 1 or 2 bytes ASDU 10 : Measured value, Normalized value with time tag ‐ Information Object address : 2 bytes ASDU 11 : Measured Value, Scaled value ‐ Cause of Transmission : 1 byte ASDU 12 : Measured value, Scaled value with time tag ASDU 100 : Interrogation Command ASDU 103 : Clock Synchronization Command ASDU 120 ‐ 126 : File transfer Command IEC 60870-5-101 Data Frame

Frame Length

Control Field

Address

• As balanced communications are point‐to‐point the link address is redundant, but may be included for security • ASDU contains address of the controlling station in the ‘control direction’, and the address of the controlled station in the ‘monitoring direction’ • Unique address for each data element IEC 60870-5-101 Data Exchange

Link Layer Balanced Transmission Link Layer Unbalanced Transmission

 At the link layer, all devices are equal  Only Master device can transmit primary frames  restricted to point‐to‐point and to multiple point‐to‐point configurations  Collision avoidance is not necessary since slave device cannot initiate exchange  Collision avoidance by‐  If the slave device responds with NACK:  Full duplex point to point connection (requested data not available) the master (RS232 or four wire RS485) will try again until it gets data, or a  Designated master polls slaves on n/w response time‐out occurs IEC 60870-5-104

 Based on data transmission via Ethernet (TCP/IP)  An extension of IEC 101 protocol with the changes in transport, network, link & physical layer services to suit the complete network access  Application layer of IEC 104 is same as that of IEC 101 with some of the data types and facilities not used  offers considerable benefits compared with the serial data transmission ‐  Higher level safety  Flexible network layout  Numerous network utilities  Simplified management of connected devices  Reduced time and cost for maintenance and servicing  The security of IEC 104, by design has been proven to be problematic IEC 60870-5-104

 Operation of the lower layers of IEC 60870‐5‐104 is completely different from that of the IEC 60870‐5‐101.  These layers correspond to all the layers below the application layer,  Architectures of these layers are concerned with how message transports happen. ICCP Protocol

• Inter‐Control Center Communications Protocol (ICCP or IEC 60870‐6‐502) • Toprovidedataexchangeoverwideareanetworks(WANs)betweenutility control centers, utilities, power pools, regional control centers, and Non‐ Utility Generators. ICCP Protocol Associations An application Association needs to be established between two ICCP instances before any data exchange can take place. Associations can be Initiated, Concluded or Aborted by the ICCP instances. Bilateral Agreement and Table for Access Control A Bilateral Agreement between two control‐centers (say A and B) for data access. A Bilateral Table is a digital representation of the Agreement. Data Values Data Values are objects that represent the values of control‐center objects including points (Analog, Digital, and Controls) or data structures. Data Sets Data Sets are ordered‐lists of Data Value objects that can be created locally by an ICCP server or on request by an ICCP client Information Messages Information Message objects are used to exchange text or other data between Control Centers. Transfer Sets Transfer Set objects are used for complex data exchange schemes to transferDataSets(all elements or a subset of the Data set elements) etc. Devices Devices are the ICCP objects that represent controllable objects in the control center. ICCP Protocol Conformance Blocks • ICCP divides the entire ICCP functionality into 9 conformance block subsets • Implementations can declare the blocks that they provide support for • Specify the level of ICCP supported by the implementation • Any ICCP implementation must necessarily support Block 1 Block 1 – Basic Services Status and analogue points, quality flags, time‐stamp, protection events, association, data set Block 2 – Extended Data Set Condition Monitoring Provides report on exception of the data types that block 1 is able to transfer periodically Block 3 – Blocked Transfers Provides a means of transferring Block 1 and Block 2 data types as block transfers instead of point by point Block 4 – Information Message Information Message objects, Simple text and binary files Block 5 – Device Control Control requests: on/off, trip/close, raise/lower etc. and digital setpoints Block 6 ‐ Program Control Allows an ICCP client to remote control programs executing on an ICCP server Block 7 ‐ Event Reporting Extended reporting to a client of error conditions and device state changesataserver. Block 8 ‐ Additional User Objects Scheduling, accounting, outage and other plant information. Block 9 ‐ Time Series Data Allows client to request server a report of historical time series data between start & end date Secure ICCP Protocol

• Secure ICCP is an extension of the existing standard ICCP. • Security (TLS) is inserted into the appropriate layer of the standard communications profile • TLS is a certificate‐based cryptographic protocol that provides encryption and authentication • Secure ICCP provides application layer authentication and message encryption between ICCP servers. DNP 3 Protocol

 Distributed Network Protocol (DNP), an open protocol, used between components in process automation systems  Based on Enhanced Performance architecture ( EPA) model  Primarily used for communications between a master station and IEDs or RTUs  Supports multiple‐slave, peer‐to‐peer and multiple‐master communications  DNP contains Application and Data Link Layers, with a pseudo‐transport layer  DNP protocol is simply encapsulated within TCP/IP  widely used over a variety of physical layers, including RS‐232, RS‐422, RS‐ 485, and TCP/IP  Supports the operational modes of polled and quiescent operation DNP 3 Protocol

 Pseudo‐transport layer(OSI Layer 4) used to build application data messages larger than a single data link frame  Uses FT3 frame format  Can request and respond with multiple data types in single messages  segment messages into multiple frames to ensure excellent error detection and recovery  designed to optimize the transmission of data acquisition information and control commands from one computer to another  Respond without request (unsolicited)  provides interoperability between different vendor’s equipment  provides multiplexing, data fragmentation, error checking, link control, prioritization, and layer 2 addressing services for user data  not designed to be secure from attacks by hackers DNP 3 Protocol Layers

The pseudo‐transport layer • To allow for the transmission of larger blocks of data • Network functions for routing and flow control of data packets over networks. • Transport functions provide network transparent end‐to‐end delivery of messages • Disassembly and reassembly, and error correction of messages. DNP 3 Message Buildup DNP 3 Protocol - FT3 frame format

• 10 byte header, followed optionally by up to 16 data blocks • Overall message size limited to 292 bytes, maximum data capacity of 250 bytes • Fully packed frame will comprise the header plus 16 data blocks, with the last block containing 10 data bytes • START - 2 bytes: Start of frame • LENGTH - Count of user data in bytes • CONTROL - Frame control byte • DESTINATION - 2 byte destination address (LSB, MSB) • SOURCE - 2 byte source address (LSB, MSB) • CRC - 2 byte cyclic redundancy check code DNP 3 - Message Communication

• In SCADA, some stations may be identified as master stations, and others as slave stations • There may be some devices that act both as slave stations and master stations • Master/slave distinction applies at the application level • At the data link level, the terms balanced and unbalanced • In ‘unbalanced’ systems, only master stations will initiate communications • The DNP3 protocol supports balanced communications at the data link level to provide greater flexibility by allowing non‐master stations to initiate communications • In DNP3 any station can be an originator or primary station (Not necessary to be master) • Master/Slave used at the link level for setting of a message direction bit, the DIR bit. DNP 3 Vs. IEC 60870-5-101

DNP 3.0 IEC 60870‐5‐101 Standard Open Standard IEC Standard Dominant Market North America Europe Architecture 4‐layer architecture supports 3‐layer EPA architecture TCP/IP Application Layer messages encapsulated in Application functions specified in a function data link frames data link layer message Frames application layer message Single application function require consist of many data link several messages to be sent to frames complete function Transmission Only balanced Balanced and unbalanced Device pairs of devices may swap pairs of devices will not swap Addressing master and slave roles master and slave roles Frame Format FT3 FT1.2 Protocols IS 16444

IS 16444 was adopted by the BIS in 2015 and consists of Two parts –

IS 16444 (Part 1): 2015 • Static Watthour direct connected meters consisting of measuring element(s), time of use register (s), display, load switch, and built in / plug in type bidirectional communication module all integral with the meter housing. • Smart meter for indoor use & capable of forward (import) or both forward (import) and reverse (export) energy measurement. • Covers the general requirements and tests for a.c. static direct connected Watthour smart meter, class 1 & 2.

IS 16444 (Part 2): 2017 • Transformer operated static watt-hour meters & Var-Hour meters consisting of measuring element(s), time of use register(s), display and built in / plug in type bidirectional communication module all integral with the meter housing. • Smart meter for indoor use & capable of forward (import) or import and export energy measurement. • Covers the general requirements and tests for a.c. Static Transformer operated Watthour & Var-Hour Smart Meters, Class 0.2S, 0.5S & 1.0S. IEC 62056 • Set of Protocols for electricity metering data exchange (IEC TC13WG14) • International version of DLMS (Device Language Message Specification)/COSEM (Companion Specification for Energy Metering) • COSEM contains set of specifications that define the Transport and Application layer of DLMS protocol • DLMS users association defines protocol into set of 4 specification documents – . Green Book – DLMS/COSEM Architecture and Protocols . Blue Book ‐ COSEM interface classes and OBIS (Object Identification System) . Yellow Book ‐ DLMS/COSEM Conformance Testing Process . White Book ‐ Glossary of Terms • Not only applicable to electricity metering, it is equally applicable to water, gas, and heating metering systems also • All the data in electronic meters and associated devices are represented by means of mapping them to appropriate classes and attributes • Specifies an interface model and communication protocols for data exchange with metering equipment DLMS/COSEM

The DLMS/COSEM specification follows a three‐step approach: • Step 1, Modelling: Covers the interface model of metering equipment and rules for data identification; • Step 2, Messaging: Covers the services for mapping the interface model to application layer protocol data units (APDU) and the encoding of this APDUs. • Step 3, Transporting: Covers the transportation of the messages through the communication channel.

Source: DLMS/COSEM Green Book DLMS/COSEM Communication Model HDLC ‐ High‐level Data Link Control Client Server Model LLC ‐ Logical Link Control (Sublayer) SAP ‐ Service Access Point MAC ‐ Medium Access Control UDP ‐ User Datagram Protocol TCP ‐ Transmission Control Protocol

• Uses the concepts of OSI model to model information exchange between meters and data collection systems (DCS) • Application functions of meters & DCS are modelled by application processes (APs). • Communication between APs is modelled by communication between application entities (AEs) • AE represents the communication

functions of an AP. Source:Source: DLMS/COSEM DLMS/COSEM Green Green Book Book Connection oriented operation • The DLMS/COSEM AL is connection oriented • A communication session consists of three phases: . First, an application level connection, called Application Association (AA), is established between a client and a server Application Entities (AE) . Once the AA is established, message exchange can take place . At the end of the data exchange, the AA is released. • Servers cannot initiate the establishment of an AA • A COSEM logical device may support one or more AAs, each with a different client • Each AA determines the contexts in which information exchange takes place. Source: DLMS/COSEMGreen Book DLMS/COSEM Server Model ACSE ‐ Association Control Service Element ASE ‐ Application Service Element CO ‐ Connection‐oriented DLMS/COSEM Client Model