DOCSLIB.ORG

Lentil Anthracnose CP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lentil Anthracnose CP Contingency Plan – Colletotrichum truncatum (Lentil anthracnose) Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Grains Industry Threat Specific Contingency Plan Lentil anthracnose Colletotrichum truncatum Prepared by Dr Trevor Bretag and Plant Health Australia August 2008 Disclaimer: The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Page 1 of 25 Contingency Plan – Colletotrichum truncatum (Lentil anthracnose) 1 Purpose of this Contingency Plan................................................................................................... 4 2 Pest information/status .................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Pest Details .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 General information ......................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Life cycle........................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Dispersal........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Affected Hosts ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Host range ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.2 Geographic distribution .................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Symptoms ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Entry, establishment and spread................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Diagnostic information ................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.1 Diagnostic protocol .......................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Response checklist ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.5.1 Checklist ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.6 Delimiting survey and epidemiology study ................................................................................. 10 2.6.1 Sampling method ........................................................................................................... 11 2.6.2 Epidemiological study .................................................................................................... 12 2.6.3 Models of spread potential ............................................................................................ 12 2.6.4 Pest Free Area (PFA) guidelines .................................................................................. 13 2.7 Availability of control methods ..................................................................................................... 13 2.7.1 General procedures for control...................................................................................... 13 2.7.2 Control if small areas are affected ................................................................................ 14 2.7.3 Control if large areas are affected ................................................................................. 14 2.7.4 Cultural control ............................................................................................................... 14 2.7.5 Host plant resistance ..................................................................................................... 14 2.7.6 Chemical control ............................................................................................................ 14 2.7.7 Mechanical control ......................................................................................................... 15 2.7.8 Biological control ............................................................................................................ 15 3 Course of Action – Eradication Methods ...................................................................................... 15 3.1 Destruction strategy ..................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Destruction protocols ..................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Decontamination protocols ............................................................................................ 16 3.1.3 Priorities .......................................................................................................................... 16 Page 2 of 25 Contingency Plan – Colletotrichum truncatum (Lentil anthracnose) 3.1.4 Plants, by-products and waste processing ................................................................... 17 3.1.5 Disposal issues .............................................................................................................. 17 3.2 Quarantine and movement controls ............................................................................................ 17 3.2.1 Quarantine priorities....................................................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Movement control for people, plant material and machinery ....................................... 17 3.3 Zoning........................................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.1 Destruction zone ............................................................................................................ 18 3.3.2 Quarantine zone............................................................................................................. 18 3.3.3 Buffer zone ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.4 Restricted Area .............................................................................................................. 18 3.3.5 Control Area ................................................................................................................... 19 3.4 Decontamination and farm clean up ........................................................................................... 19 3.4.1 Decontamination procedures ........................................................................................ 19 3.4.2 General safety precautions............................................................................................ 19 3.5 Surveillance and tracing .............................................................................................................. 19 3.5.1 Surveillance .................................................................................................................... 19 3.5.2 Survey regions ............................................................................................................... 20 3.5.3 Post-eradication surveillance ........................................................................................ 21 4 References..................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Websites ....................................................................................................................................... 23 5 Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 23 Appendix 1. Standard diagnostic protocols ....................................................................................... 23 Appendix 2. Experts, resources and facilities ................................................................................... 23 Appendix 3. Communications strategy .............................................................................................. 25 Appendix 4. Market access impacts .................................................................................................. 25 Page 3 of 25 Contingency Plan – Colletotrichum truncatum (Lentil anthracnose) 1 Purpose of this Contingency Plan This Contingency Plan provides background information on the pest biology and available control measures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 716–784 By: P.W
    Fungal Planet description sheets: 716–784 By: P.W. Crous, M.J. Wingfield, T.I. Burgess, G.E.St.J. Hardy, J. Gené, J. Guarro, I.G. Baseia, D. García, L.F.P. Gusmão, C.M. Souza-Motta, R. Thangavel, S. Adamčík, A. Barili, C.W. Barnes, J.D.P. Bezerra, J.J. Bordallo, J.F. Cano-Lira, R.J.V. de Oliveira, E. Ercole, V. Hubka, I. Iturrieta-González, A. Kubátová, M.P. Martín, P.-A. Moreau, A. Morte, M.E. Ordoñez, A. Rodríguez, A.M. Stchigel, A. Vizzini, J. Abdollahzadeh, V.P. Abreu, K. Adamčíková, G.M.R. Albuquerque, A.V. Alexandrova, E. Álvarez Duarte, C. Armstrong-Cho, S. Banniza, R.N. Barbosa, J.-M. Bellanger, J.L. Bezerra, T.S. Cabral, M. Caboň, E. Caicedo, T. Cantillo, A.J. Carnegie, L.T. Carmo, R.F. Castañeda-Ruiz, C.R. Clement, A. Čmoková, L.B. Conceição, R.H.S.F. Cruz, U. Damm, B.D.B. da Silva, G.A. da Silva, R.M.F. da Silva, A.L.C.M. de A. Santiago, L.F. de Oliveira, C.A.F. de Souza, F. Déniel, B. Dima, G. Dong, J. Edwards, C.R. Félix, J. Fournier, T.B. Gibertoni, K. Hosaka, T. Iturriaga, M. Jadan, J.-L. Jany, Ž. Jurjević, M. Kolařík, I. Kušan, M.F. Landell, T.R. Leite Cordeiro, D.X. Lima, M. Loizides, S. Luo, A.R. Machado, H. Madrid, O.M.C. Magalhães, P. Marinho, N. Matočec, A. Mešić, A.N. Miller, O.V. Morozova, R.P. Neves, K. Nonaka, A. Nováková, N.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Colletotrichum – Names in Current Use
    Online advance Fungal Diversity Colletotrichum – names in current use Hyde, K.D.1,7*, Cai, L.2, Cannon, P.F.3, Crouch, J.A.4, Crous, P.W.5, Damm, U. 5, Goodwin, P.H.6, Chen, H.7, Johnston, P.R.8, Jones, E.B.G.9, Liu, Z.Y.10, McKenzie, E.H.C.8, Moriwaki, J.11, Noireung, P.1, Pennycook, S.R.8, Pfenning, L.H.12, Prihastuti, H.1, Sato, T.13, Shivas, R.G.14, Tan, Y.P.14, Taylor, P.W.J.15, Weir, B.S.8, Yang, Y.L.10,16 and Zhang, J.Z.17 1,School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chaing Rai, Thailand 2Research & Development Centre, Novozymes, Beijing 100085, PR China 3CABI, Bakeham Lane, Egham, Surrey TW20 9TY, UK and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK 4Cereal Disease Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1551 Lindig Street, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 5CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands 6School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada 7International Fungal Research & Development Centre, The Research Institute of Resource Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Bailongsi, Kunming 650224, PR China 8Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand 9BIOTEC Bioresources Technology Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, NSTDA, 113 Thailand Science Park, Paholyothin Road, Khlong 1, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand 10Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou 550006 PR China 11Hokuriku Research Center, National Agricultural Research Center,
    [Show full text]
  • Colletotrichum: a Catalogue of Confusion
    Online advance Fungal Diversity Colletotrichum: a catalogue of confusion Hyde, K.D.1,2*, Cai, L.3, McKenzie, E.H.C.4, Yang, Y.L.5,6, Zhang, J.Z.7 and Prihastuti, H.2,8 1International Fungal Research & Development Centre, The Research Institute of Resource Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Bailongsi, Kunming 650224, PR China 2School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Thasud, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand 3Novozymes China, No. 14, Xinxi Road, Shangdi, HaiDian, Beijing, 100085, PR China 4Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand 5Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou 550006 PR China 6Department of Biology and Geography, Liupanshui Normal College. Shuicheng, Guizhou 553006, P.R. China 7Institute of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Kaixuan Rd 258, Hangzhou 310029, PR China 8Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University, Malang 65145, Indonesia Hyde, K.D., Cai, L., McKenzie, E.H.C., Yang, Y.L., Zhang, J.Z. and Prihastuti, H. (2009). Colletotrichum: a catalogue of confusion. Fungal Diversity 39: 1-17. Identification of Colletotrichum species has long been difficult due to limited morphological characters. Single gene phylogenetic analyses have also not proved to be very successful in delineating species. This may be partly due to the high level of erroneous names in GenBank. In this paper we review the problems associated with taxonomy of Colletotrichum and difficulties in identifying taxa to species. We advocate epitypification and use of multi-locus phylogeny to delimit species and gain a better understanding of the genus. We review the lifestyles of Colletotrichum species, which may occur as epiphytes, endophytes, saprobes and pathogens.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Australian Capsicum Industry from Incursions of Colletotrichum Pathogens
    Protecting the Australian Capsicum industry from incursions of Colletotrichum pathogens Dilani Danushika De Silva ORCID identifier 0000-0003-4294-6665 Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences The University of Melbourne January 2019 1 2 Declaration I declare that this thesis comprises only my original work towards the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used. This thesis does not exceed 100,000 words and complies with the stipulations set out for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by the University of Melbourne. Dilani De Silva January 2019 i Acknowledgements I am truly grateful to my supervisor Professor Paul Taylor for his immense support during my PhD, his knowledge, patience and enthusiasm was key for my success. Your passion and knowledge on plant pathology has always inspired me to do more. I appreciate your time and the effort you put in to help me with my research as well as taking the time to understand and help me cope during the most difficult times of my life. This achievement would not have been possible without your guidance and encouragement. I am blessed to have a supervisor like you and I could not have imagined having a better advisor for my PhD study. I sincerely thank Dr. Peter Ades whose great advice, your vast knowledge in statistical analysis, insightful comments and encouragement is what incented me to widen my research to various perspectives. I extend my gratitude to my external supervisor Professor Pedro Crous for his invaluable contribution in taxonomy and phylogenetic studies of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Colletotrichum Truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & W.D
    -- CALIFORNIA D EPAUMENT OF cdfa FOOD & AGRICULTURE ~ California Pest Rating Proposal for Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & W.D. Moore 1935 Soybean anthracnose Current Pest Rating: Q Proposed Pest Rating: B Domain: Eukaryota, Kingdom: Fungi, Phylum: Ascomycota, Subphylum: Pezizomycotina, Class: Sordariomycetes, Subclass: Sordariomycetidae, Family: Glomerellaceae Comment Period: 02/02/2021 through 03/19/2021 Initiating Event: In 2003, an incoming shipment of Jatropha plants from Costa Rica was inspected by a San Luis Obispo County agricultural inspector. The inspector submitted leaves showing dieback symptoms to CDFA’s Plant pest diagnostics center for diagnosis. From the leaf spots, CDFA plant pathologist Timothy Tidwell identified the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum capsici, which was not known to be present in California, and assigned a temporary Q rating. In 2015, a sample was submitted by Los Angeles County agricultural inspectors from Ficus plants shipping from Florida. Plant Pathologist Suzanne Latham diagnosed C. truncatum, a species that was synonymized with C. capsisi in 2009, from the leaf spots. She was able to culture the fungus from leaf spots and confirm its identity by PCR and DNA sequencing. Between 2016 and 2020, multiple samples of alfalfa plants from Imperial County with leafspots and dieback were submitted to the CDFA labs as part of the PQ seed quarantine program with infections from C. truncatum. Seed mother plants must be free-from specific disease of quarantine significance in order to be given phytosanitary certificates for export. Although not a pest of concern for alfalfa, C. truncatum is on the list for beans grown for export seed. The risk to California from C.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthracnose Fungi with Curved Conidia, Colletotrichum Spp
    JARQ 49 (4), 351 - 362 (2015) http://www.jircas.affrc.go.jp Anthracnose Fungi with Curved Conidia, Colletotrichum spp. belonging to Ribosomal Groups 9-13, and Their Host Ranges in Japan Toyozo SATO1*, Jouji MORIWAKI2 and Shigeru KANEKO1 1 Genetic Resources Center, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan) 2 Horticulture Research Division, NARO Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (Kurume, Fukuoka 839-8503, Japan) Abstract Ninety fungal strains with falcate conidia belonging to Colletotrichum spp. classified into the ribosomal groups 9-13 (the RG 9-13 spp.) and preserved at the NIAS Genebank, Japan were re-identified based on molecular phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA gene, sequences of the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, chitin synthase 1, histone3, and actin genes, and partial sequences of β-tubulin-2 (TUB2) genes, or by BLASTN searches with TUB2 gene sequences. Seventy strains were reclassified into nine recently revised species, C. chlorophyti, C. circinans, C. dematium sensu stricto, C. lineola, C. liriopes, C. spaethianum, C. tofieldiae, C. trichel- lum and C. truncatum, whereas 20 strains were grouped into four unidentified species. RG 9, 10 and 12 corresponded to the C. spaethianum, C. dematium and C. truncatum species complex, respectively, while RG 11 and 13 agreed with C. chlorophyti and C. trichellum, respectively. Phylograms derived from a six-locus analysis and from TUB2 single-locus analysis were very similar to one another with the exception of the association between C. dematium s. str. and C. lineola. Thus, TUB2 partial gene sequences are proposed as an effective genetic marker to differentiate species of RG 9-13 in Japan except for C.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Currently Accepted Species of Colletotrichum
    Mycosphere 7(8) 1192-1260(2016) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/si/2c/9 Copyright © Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Notes on currently accepted species of Colletotrichum Jayawardena RS1,2, Hyde KD2,3, Damm U4, Cai L5, Liu M1, Li XH1, Zhang W1, Zhao WS6 and Yan JY1,* 1 Institute of Plant and Environment Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, People’s Republic of China 2 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand 3 Key Laboratory for Plant Biodiversity and Biogeography of East Asia (KLPB), Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China 4 Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany 5State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China 6Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China. Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Damm U, Cai L, Liu M, Li XH, Zhang W, Zhao WS, Yan JY 2016 – Notes on currently accepted species of Colletotrichum. Mycosphere 7(8) 1192–1260, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/si/2c/9 Abstract Colletotrichum is an economically important plant pathogenic genus worldwide, but can also have endophytic or saprobic lifestyles. The genus has undergone numerous revisions in the past decades with the addition, typification and synonymy of many species. In this study, we provide an account of the 190 currently accepted species, one doubtful species and one excluded species that have molecular data. Species are listed alphabetically and annotated with their habit, host and geographic distribution, phylogenetic position, their sexual morphs and uses (if there are any known).
    [Show full text]
  • The Colletotrichum Destructivum Species Complex – Hemibiotrophic Pathogens of Forage and field Crops
    available online at www.studiesinmycology.org STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 79: 49–84. The Colletotrichum destructivum species complex – hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops U. Damm1*, R.J. O'Connell2, J.Z. Groenewald1, and P.W. Crous1,3,4 1CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2UMR1290 BIOGER-CPP, INRA-AgroParisTech, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France; 3Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa; 4Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR), Laboratory of Phytopathology, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands *Correspondence: U. Damm, [email protected], Present address: Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany. Abstract: Colletotrichum destructivum is an important plant pathogen, mainly of forage and grain legumes including clover, alfalfa, cowpea and lentil, but has also been reported as an anthracnose pathogen of many other plants worldwide. Several Colletotrichum isolates, previously reported as closely related to C. destructivum, are known to establish hemibiotrophic infections in different hosts. The inconsistent application of names to those isolates based on outdated species concepts has caused much taxonomic confusion, particularly in the plant pathology literature. A multilocus DNA sequence analysis (ITS, GAPDH, CHS-1, HIS3, ACT, TUB2) of 83 isolates of C. destructivum and related species revealed 16 clades that are recognised as separate species in the C. destructivum complex, which includes C. destructivum, C. fuscum, C. higginsianum, C. lini and C. tabacum. Each of these species is lecto-, epi- or neotypified in this study. Additionally, eight species, namely C. americae- borealis, C. antirrhinicola, C. bryoniicola, C.
    [Show full text]
  • AFLP Characterization in Pathogenic and Coprophilous Fungi
    MYCOTAXON Volume 110, pp. 81–87 October–December 2009 AFLP characterization in pathogenic and coprophilous fungi Isabel E. Cinto1*, Alexandra M. Gottlieb2, Marcela Gally3, Maria E. Ranalli1 & Araceli M. Ramos1 *[email protected] 1 Lab 9, Departamento Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental Facultad de Cs. Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires Int. Güiraldes 2620 - C1428EHA - Buenos Aires - Argentina 2 LACyE, Departamento Ecología Genética y Evolución Facultad de Cs. Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires Int. Güiraldes 2620 - C1428EHA - Buenos Aires - Argentina 3 Cátedra de Fitopatología, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires Av. San Martín 4453 - C1417DSE - Buenos Aires - Argentina Abstract — The objective of this study was to ascertain the usefulness of the AFLP technique in assessing genetic diversity among 47 strains belonging to three Ascomycota genera and as a tool for solving taxonomic problems in related morphological species. Four MseI +1 primers were assayed in combination with two EcoRI +2 and four EcoRI +3 primers. In the present study both +2 and +3 EcoRI primers were informative, but EcoRI +2 produced profiles with high complexity. The addition of the extra selective nucleotide reduced the complexity of the banding patterns generating easily readable patterns to evaluate genetic diversity within and among species. Of the three ascomycetous genera assessed in this study, Colletotrichum (Glomerellaceae) presented the highest proportion of polymorphic AFLP loci, followed in order by Iodophanus (Pezizaceae) and Saccobolus (Ascobolaceae). Key words — ascomycetes, genetic characterization, molecular markers, taxonomy Introduction Morphological and biochemical characterization of microscopic fungi have usually led to uncertainties in identification when dealing with closely related species or nearly clonal fungal isolates (van Brummelen 1967, Kimbrough et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Colletotrichum: Biological Control, Bio- Catalyst, Secondary Metabolites and Toxins
    Mycosphere 7(8) 1164-1176(2016) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/si/2c/7 Copyright © Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Mycosphere Essay 16: Colletotrichum: Biological control, bio- catalyst, secondary metabolites and toxins Jayawardena RS1,2, Li XH1, Liu M1, Zhang W1 and Yan JY1* 1 Institute of Plant and Environment Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, People’s Republic of China 2 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research and School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand Jayawardena RS, Li XH, Liu M, Zhang W, Yan JY 2016 – Mycosphere Essay 16: Colletotrichum: Biological control, bio-catalyst, secondary metabolites and toxins. Mycosphere 7(8) 1164–1176, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/si/2c/7 Abstract The genus Colletotrichum has received considerable attention in the past decade because of its role as an important plant pathogen. The importance of Colletotrichum with regard to industrial application has however, received little attention from scientists over many years. The aim of the present paper is to explore the importance of Colletotrichum species as bio-control agents and as a bio-catalyst as well as secondary metabolites and toxin producers. Often the names assigned to the above four industrial applications have lacked an accurate taxonomic basis and this needs consideration. The current paper provides detailed background of the above topics. Key words – biotransformation – colletotrichin – mycoherbicide – mycoparasites – pathogenisis – phytopathogen Introduction Colletotrichum was introduced by Corda (1831), and is a coelomycete belonging to the family Glomerellaceae (Maharachchikumbura et al. 2015, 2016). Species of this genus are widely known as pathogens of economical crops worldwide (Cannon et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Name = Colletotrichum Truncatum and Its Synonyms
    19/9/2019 All data for a single taxon * **Tell us why you value the fungal databases*** Fungus-Host - 932 records were found using the criteria: name = Colletotrichum truncatum and its synonyms Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & W.D. Moore 1935 (Ascomycetes, Phyllachorales) ≡ Vermicularia truncata Schwein. 1832 ≡Colletotrichum dematium f. truncatum (Schwein.) Arx 1957 Note: As 'truncata'. = Vermicularia capsici Syd. 1913 ≡ Colletotrichum capsici (Syd.) E.J. Butler & Bisby 1931 ≡ Steirochaete capsici (Syd.) Sacc. 1921 = Colletotrichum curvatum Briant & E.B. Martyn 1929 = Colletotrichum indicum Dastur 1934 ≡ Vermicularia indica (Dastur) Vassiljevsky 1950 Notes: Roberts and Snow (1990) considered C. capcisi and C. indicum conspecific based on morphological and pathological studies. Distribution: Cosmopolitan. Substrate: Leaves, stems, flowers, fruit. Disease Note: Anthracnose, blight, dieback, leaf, fruit, and stem rots. Host: Multiple genera in multiple families; major pathogen of Jatropha curcas (Euphorbiaceae). Supporting Literature: Aktaruzzaman, M., Afroz, T., Lee, Y.-G., and Kim, B.-S. 2018. Post-harvest anthracnose of papaya caused by Colletotrichum truncatum in Korea. Eur. J. Pl. Pathol. 150(1): 259-265. Bahri, B.A., Saadani, M., Mechichi, G., and Rouissi, W. 2019. Genetic diversity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex associated with Citrus wither-tip of twigs in Tunisia using microsatellite markers. J. Phytopathol. 167(6): 351-362. Bi, Y., Guo, W., Zhang, G.J., Liu, S.C., and Chen, Y. 2017. First report of Colletotrichum truncatum causing anthracnose of strawberry in China. Pl. Dis. 101(5): 832. Cavalcante, G.R.S., Barguil, B.M., Vieira, W.A.S., Lima, W.G., Michereff, S.J., Doyle, V.P., and Camara, M.P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colletotrichum Destructivum Species Complex - Hemibiotrophic Pathogens of Forage and Field Crops U
    The Colletotrichum destructivum species complex - hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops U. Damm, Richard O’Connell, J. Z. Groenewald, P. W. Crous To cite this version: U. Damm, Richard O’Connell, J. Z. Groenewald, P. W. Crous. The Colletotrichum destructivum species complex - hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops. Studies in Mycology, Centraal- bureau voor Schimmelcultures, 2014, pp.49 - 84. 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.003. hal-02641019 HAL Id: hal-02641019 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02641019 Submitted on 28 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License available online at www.studiesinmycology.org STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 79: 49–84. The Colletotrichum destructivum species complex – hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops U. Damm1*, R.J. O'Connell2, J.Z. Groenewald1, and P.W. Crous1,3,4 1CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2UMR1290 BIOGER-CPP, INRA-AgroParisTech, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France; 3Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa; 4Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR), Laboratory of Phytopathology, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands *Correspondence: U.
    [Show full text]