DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources Biennial Report January 15, 2011 Pursuant to: M.S. 116P.09, Subd. 7 Please return this document to the LCCMR office: Room 65 State Office Building LEGISLATIVE-CITIZEN COMMISSION ON MINNESOTA RESOURCES (LCCMR) 2009-10 Biennial Report Overview Overview: January 1, 2009—December 31, 2010 Special points of interest: During the period between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 the Legislative-Citizen Com- New logo for the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund mission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR): introduced in 2009. Submitted and received passage of two fund- $51.6 million was recommended ing recommendations bills—one each to the and approved to go toward 134 2009 Legislature and 2010 Legislature— individual projects around the state providing $51.6 million to 134 natural re- (ML 2009, ML 2010). sources projects around the state. For FY 2012-13, $51.4 million is Issued two Requests for Proposal (RFP) to being recommended to fund 92 conduct selection process for funding recom- individual projects around the state. mendations to the 2010 Legislature and 2011 During 2009-2010, LCCMR pro- Legislature (the process for recommendations vided administration and oversight to the 2009 Legislature was conducted prior for 398 individual projects,, repre- to January 1, 2009). senting approximately $163 million Western prairie-fringed orchid (Platanthera praeclara) in appropriations, in various stages Received, reviewed, and evaluated 481 pro- growing on Touch the Sky Northern Tallgrass Prairie Na- tional Wildlife Refuge near Luverne, MN—ENRTF Project of their timelines, ranging from posals replying to the 2010 and 2011-12 RFPs. developing work plans in prepara- Kickoff Event, 07/10/10 140 proposals (163 individual projects) were tion to begin to reaching completion (2), and 2010 (1). and submitting final reports. selected for recommendation. Visited natural resources sites in northeastern Finalized recommendations to the 2011 Legis- LCCMR heard from numerous MN, the Twin Cities metro area, and the Min- public and private sector environ- lature of $51.4 million to 92 projects around nesota River Valley in Central MN. ment and natural resources experts the state (bill introduction after December 31, and visited natural resource sites 2010). Collaborated with the Minnesota Lottery to around the state. create and launch a new logo for the Environ- Conducted peer review process for 39 re- ment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. search projects recommended for funding. Heard from numerous natural resources ex- Administered 398 open projects, representing perts from both the public and private sector. approximately $163 million in appropria- tions, in various stages of their timelines, 144 Continued support for activities protecting Contents: of which reached completion in 2009-10, and enhancing Minnesota’s natural resources including projects begun in 2003 (1), 2005 and providing benefit over an extended pe- (11), 2006 (4), 2007 (76), 2008 (53), 2009 riod of time. MN’s Environment and 2 Natural Resources Trust Fund LCCMR Process 2011: 2 The LCCMR makes funding rec- and natural resources projects The LCCMR has oversight over Project Recommendations ommendations to the MN legisla- that could provide multiple eco- projects funded. Projects must ture for special environment and logical and other public benefits have a work program approved, 2010: 2 natural resources projects, pri- to Minnesota. provide ongoing project updates, Projects Funded and deliver a final report upon marily from the Environment The LCCMR reviews, evaluates, and Natural Resources Trust project completion. 2009: 3 and ranks all proposals submit- Projects Funded Fund. These recommendations ted. A selection of the highest For the recommendations to the are the product of a competitive, ranked proposals are invited to 2011 Legislature, a total of 241 Highlights of Projects 3 multi-step proposal and selection present before the LCCMR. Fi- proposals requesting a combined Completed or Underway process. nally, based on the total dollars $162 million were received in Each funding cycle, a Request for available, a subset of the propos- response to the 2011-12 RFP and, 3 2011-2012: Proposal (RFP) is issued for als are chosen to recommend to from those, a total of 92 propos- Request for Proposal (RFP) funding priorities determined by the legislature for funding. als were recommended for some portion of the $50.6 million the Commission based on its 6- The funding recommendations About LCCMR 4 available. year strategic plan and ongoing go before the MN House and information gathering activities, Senate in the form of a bill, and The LCCMR is made up of 17 including expert-led issue semi- 2009: 4 upon passage the bill goes to the members: 5 Senators, 5 Repre- Information Gathering nars and visits to natural re- Governor to be signed into law. sentatives, 5 citizens appointed source sites around the state. Funding becomes available to by the governor, 1 citizen ap- The RFP is open to everyone with projects beginning July 1 of the pointed by the House, and 1 citi- innovative ideas for environment next fiscal year. zen appointed by the Senate. Page 2 LEGISLATIVE-CITIZEN COMMISSION ON MINNESOTA RESOURCES (LCCMR) About MN’s Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund The Environment and Natural water, land, fish, wildlife, and contributions and investment Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) other natural resources." income. Forty percent of the net is a permanent fund in the state The ENRTF was created to pro- proceeds from the Minnesota treasury established in the Min- vide a long-term, consistent, and State Lottery, or ~7 cents of nesota Constitution through stable source of funding for in- every dollar spent playing the voter approval in 1988. novative activities directed at lottery, are contributed to the It holds assets that can be ap- protecting and enhancing Min- ENRTF each year. Once depos- propriated by law, "for the pub- nesota's environment and natu- ited, contributions become part lic purpose of protection, con- ral resources. of the principal balance and are invested in a combination of servation, preservation, and The money in the ENRTF origi- stocks and bonds. enhancement of the state's air, nates from a combination of ML 2011: Project Recommendations (to begin July 1, 2011) Approximately $50.6 million is bination of fee title (1,766 acres) cies protection, ecosystem con- being recommended to fund 92 and conservation easements servation, bioenergy, water individual projects around the (1,310 acres). quality and conservation, for- state to begin July 1, 2011. Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitat estry, invasive species, pollution, Natural Resource Inventory, Restoration, Enhancement, and and sustainable building. Monitoring, Mapping, and Improvement: ~$2.4 million for Environmental Education, Out- Planning: ~$11.1 million to ob- restoration, enhancement, and reach, Demonstration, and tain critical information and improvement activities on Technical Assistance: ~$6.3 guide relevant decisions and ~6,141 acres. million for efforts that will edu- efforts, including acceleration of Parks and Trails Acquisition: cate Minnesotans on topics in- County Biological Survey, ~$6.5 million for acquisition of cluding energy conservation, County Geologic Atlas, State- ~770 acres in state parks and water conservation, natural wide Soil Survey, Wetlands In- trails and regional parks and resource science, and outdoor ventory, water quality monitor- trails. recreation; demonstrate options ing, springshed mapping, local for energy efficiency; and pro- Parks and Trails Development: conservation planning, state- vide training and technical assis- ~$4.2 million for infrastructure owned lands management, and tance on pollution prevention development in Lake Vermilion recommended guidelines for and natural resource conserva- State Park and regional parks prairie management, forest tion and management. and trails. management, and energy and Other: ~$1.4 million for FY 2012 Natural Resource Research and water conservation -2013 LCCMR administration Analysis: ~$7 million to ad- Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitat ($1,182,000) and DNR contract vance our knowledge and pro- Acquisition: ~$12.5 million for management of projects by non- vide recommendations for ad- acquisition of an estimated state entities ($220,000). dressing issues relating to spe- 3,076 acres of habitat in a com- ML 2010: Projects Funded (MN Laws 2010, Chapter 362) Approximately $26 million was Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitat aquatic contaminants, ground- appropriated to fund 73 individ- Acquisition: ~$7.1 million for water, invasive species, pollina- ual projects around the state. acquisition of an estimated tor decline, carbon sequestra- Natural Resource Inventory, 2,900 acres of land and habitat tion, unique ecosystems, and Monitoring, Mapping, and in a combination of fee title (590 energy production. Planning: ~$3.6 million to allow acres) and conservation ease- Environmental Education, Out- for efforts to obtain critical in- ments (2,309 acres). reach, Demonstration, and formation and guide relevant Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitat Technical Assistance: ~$5.6 decisions and efforts, including Restoration and Improvement: million for efforts that will edu- acceleration of County Geologic ~$2.4 million for restoration cate Minnesotans on topics in- Atlas; Wetlands Inventory; and improvement activities on cluding climate change, wildlife, Fraconia Bluffs Scientific and Natural
Recommended publications
  • Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85

    Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85

    1​ MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020​ 85.011​ CHAPTER 85​ DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION​ STATE PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES​ 85.06​ SCHOOLHOUSES IN CERTAIN STATE PARKS.​ 85.011​ CONFIRMATION OF CREATION AND​ 85.20​ VIOLATIONS OF RULES; LITTERING; PENALTIES.​ ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE PARKS, STATE​ 85.205​ RECEPTACLES FOR RECYCLING.​ RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.21​ STATE OPERATION OF PARK, MONUMENT,​ 85.0115​ NOTICE OF ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS.​ RECREATION AREA AND WAYSIDE FACILITIES;​ 85.012​ STATE PARKS.​ LICENSE NOT REQUIRED.​ 85.013​ STATE RECREATION AREAS AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.22​ STATE PARKS WORKING CAPITAL ACCOUNT.​ 85.014​ PRIOR LAWS NOT ALTERED; REVISOR'S DUTIES.​ 85.23​ COOPERATIVE LEASES OF AGRICULTURAL​ 85.0145​ ACQUIRING LAND FOR FACILITIES.​ LANDS.​ 85.0146​ CUYUNA COUNTRY STATE RECREATION AREA;​ 85.32​ STATE WATER TRAILS.​ CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL.​ 85.33​ ST. CROIX WILD RIVER AREA; LIMITATIONS ON​ STATE TRAILS​ POWER BOATING.​ 85.015​ STATE TRAILS.​ 85.34​ FORT SNELLING LEASE.​ 85.0155​ LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL.​ TRAIL PASSES​ 85.0156​ MISSISSIPPI WHITEWATER TRAIL.​ 85.40​ DEFINITIONS.​ 85.016​ BICYCLE TRAIL PROGRAM.​ 85.41​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI PASSES.​ 85.017​ TRAIL REGISTRY.​ 85.42​ USER FEE; VALIDITY.​ 85.018​ TRAIL USE; VEHICLES REGULATED, RESTRICTED.​ 85.43​ DISPOSITION OF RECEIPTS; PURPOSE.​ ADMINISTRATION​ 85.44​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI TRAIL GRANT-IN-AID​ 85.019​ LOCAL RECREATION GRANTS.​ PROGRAM.​ 85.021​ ACQUIRING LAND; MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL.​ 85.45​ PENALTIES.​ 85.04​ ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMPLOYEES.​ 85.46​ HORSE
  • The Campground Host Volunteer Program

    The Campground Host Volunteer Program

    CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM THE CAMPGROUND HOST VOLUNTEER PROGRAM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION Introduction This packet is designed to give you the information necessary to apply for a campground host position. Applications will be accepted all year but must be received at least 30 days in advance of the time you wish to serve as a host. Please send completed applications to the park manager for the park or forest campground in which you are interested. Addresses are listed at the back of this brochure. General questions and inquiries may be directed to: Campground Host Coordinator DNR-Parks and Recreation 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4039 651-259-5607 [email protected] Principal Duties and Responsibilities During the period from May to October, the volunteer serves as a "live in" host at a state park or state forest campground for at least a four-week period. The primary responsibility is to assist campers by answering questions and explaining campground rules in a cheerful and helpful manner. Campground Host volunteers should be familiar with state park and forest campground rules and should become familiar with local points of interest and the location where local services can be obtained. Volunteers perform light maintenance work around the campground such as litter pickup, sweeping, stocking supplies in toilet buildings and making emergency minor repairs when possible. Campground Host volunteers may be requested to assist in the naturalist program by posting and distributing schedules, publicizing programs or helping with programs. Volunteers will set an example by being model campers, practicing good housekeeping at all times in and around the host site, and by observing all rules.
  • Minnesota State Parks.Pdf

    Minnesota State Parks.Pdf

    Table of Contents 1. Afton State Park 4 2. Banning State Park 6 3. Bear Head Lake State Park 8 4. Beaver Creek Valley State Park 10 5. Big Bog State Park 12 6. Big Stone Lake State Park 14 7. Blue Mounds State Park 16 8. Buffalo River State Park 18 9. Camden State Park 20 10. Carley State Park 22 11. Cascade River State Park 24 12. Charles A. Lindbergh State Park 26 13. Crow Wing State Park 28 14. Cuyuna Country State Park 30 15. Father Hennepin State Park 32 16. Flandrau State Park 34 17. Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park 36 18. Fort Ridgely State Park 38 19. Fort Snelling State Park 40 20. Franz Jevne State Park 42 21. Frontenac State Park 44 22. George H. Crosby Manitou State Park 46 23. Glacial Lakes State Park 48 24. Glendalough State Park 50 25. Gooseberry Falls State Park 52 26. Grand Portage State Park 54 27. Great River Bluffs State Park 56 28. Hayes Lake State Park 58 29. Hill Annex Mine State Park 60 30. Interstate State Park 62 31. Itasca State Park 64 32. Jay Cooke State Park 66 33. John A. Latsch State Park 68 34. Judge C.R. Magney State Park 70 1 35. Kilen Woods State Park 72 36. Lac qui Parle State Park 74 37. Lake Bemidji State Park 76 38. Lake Bronson State Park 78 39. Lake Carlos State Park 80 40. Lake Louise State Park 82 41. Lake Maria State Park 84 42. Lake Shetek State Park 86 43.
  • Comprehensive Land

    Comprehensive Land

    2016 Updated by: The Murray County Comprehensive Planning Advisory Committee With Assistance from: The Southwest Regional Development Commission Adopted: December 27, 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURPOSE The County has a responsibility to protect its cultural, economic, and natural environments. Because of this, the Murray County Comprehensive Plan will identify goals, objectives, policies, and implementation strategies designed to appropriately reflect the needs of the County’s citizens and natural environment. This plan will emphasize the importance of proper planning ensuring that decisions made are best for the citizens of the County as well as the environment. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Bill Post Larry Dahl Duane Spartz Bob Sandhurst Pam Schreier Doug Stewart Brian Hamilton Ralph Knapp Keith Hakeneis Burend Cuperus Ryan Verlinde Roger Steinman Craig Bangasser Todd Miller Gary Runkle Jamie Thomazin Tom Hey Troy Wehking Jason Schreier Kevin Vickerman Dale Bergman Dave Dorpinghaus AGENCY REPREPRESENTATIVES 2016 Cathi Fouchi, Minnesota DNR Planning Becky Balk, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Marcy Barritt, Murray County Assessor Jon Bloemendaal, Murray County Ag & Solid Waste Jean Christoffels, Murray County Planning & Zoning Randy Groves, Murray County Highway Department Amy Rucker, Murray County Economic Development Randy Hukriede, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Craig Christensen, Murray County SWCD Chris Hansen, Murray County Water Resources Heath Landsman, Murray County Emergency Management Janet Timmerman, Murray
  • Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota Arw of 1862

    Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota Arw of 1862

    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History Fall 12-14-2011 Reconciling Memory: Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota arW of 1862 Julie A. Anderson Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Julie A., "Reconciling Memory: Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/28 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECONCILING MEMORY: LANDSCAPES, COMMEMORATIONS, AND ENDURING CONFLICTS OF THE U.S.-DAKOTA WAR OF 1862 by JULIE HUMANN ANDERSON Under the Direction of Clifford M. Kuhn ABSTRACT The U.S.-Dakota War of 1862 resulted in the deaths of more than 500 Minnesota settlers, the expulsion of the Dakota people from their homeland, and the largest mass execution in U.S. history. For more than a century, white Minnesotans declared themselves innocent victims of Indian brutality and actively remembered this war by erecting monuments, preserving historic landscapes, publishing first-person narratives, and hosting anniversary celebrations. However, as the centennial anniversary approached, new awareness for the sufferings of the Dakota both before and after the war prompted retellings of the traditional story that gave the status of victimhood to the Dakota as well as the white settlers.
  • Campground Host Program

    Campground Host Program

    Campground Host Program MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF PARKS AND TRAILS Updated November 2010 Campground Host Program Introduction This packet is designed to give you the information necessary to apply for a campground host position. Applications will be accepted all year but must be received at least 30 days in advance of the time you wish to serve as a host. Please send completed applications to the park manager for the park or forest campground in which you are interested. You may email your completed application to [email protected] who will forward it to your first choice park. General questions and inquiries may be directed to: Campground Host Coordinator DNR-Parks and Trails 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4039 Email: [email protected] 651-259-5607 Principal Duties and Responsibilities During the period from May to October, the volunteer serves as a "live in" host at a state park or state forest campground for at least a four-week period. The primary responsibility is to assist campers by answering questions and explaining campground rules in a cheerful and helpful manner. Campground Host volunteers should be familiar with state park and forest campground rules and should become familiar with local points of interest and the location where local services can be obtained. Volunteers perform light maintenance work around the campground such as litter pickup, sweeping, stocking supplies in toilet buildings and making emergency minor repairs when possible. Campground Host volunteers may be requested to assist in the naturalist program by posting and distributing schedules, publicizing programs or helping with programs.
  • Of 1 Agenda Item: 05 ENRTF ID: 009-A / Subd

    Of 1 Agenda Item: 05 ENRTF ID: 009-A / Subd

    Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Additional Information / Feedback ID Subd. Title Organization Program Manager Prairie Butterfly Conservation, Research and 009‐A 03c Breeding ‐ Phase 2 Minnesota Zoological Garden Erik Runquist Techniques for Water Storage Estimates in Central 018‐A 04i Minnesota U of MN John Neiber Restoring Native Mussels for Cleaner Streams and 036‐B 04c Lakes MN DNR Mike Davis 037‐B 04a Tracking and Preventing Harmful Algal Blooms Science Museum of Minnesota Daniel Engstrom Assessing the Increasing Harmful Algal Blooms in U of MN ‐ St. Anthony Falls 038‐B 04b Minnesota Lakes Laboratory Miki Hondzo Assessment of Surface Water Quality With Satellite 047‐B 04j Sensors U of MN Jacques Finlay Surface Water Bacterial Treatment System Pilot Vadnais Lake Area Water 088‐B 04u Project Management Organization Brian Corcoran Improving Outdoor Classrooms for Education and 091‐C 05b Recreation MN DNR Amy Kay Kerber Hydrogen Fuel from Wind Produced Renewable 141‐E 07f Ammonia U of MN Will Northrop Center for Energy and 144‐E 07d Geotargeted Distributed Clean Energy Initiative Environment Carl Nelson Utilization of Dairy Farm Wastewater for 148‐E 07g Sustainable Production U of MN Bradley Heins Solar Energy Utilization for Minnesota Swine Farms U of MN ‐ West Central Research 149‐E 07h – Phase 2 and Outreach Center Lee Johnston Establishment of Permanent Habitat Strips Within 154‐F 08c Row Crops Science Museum of Minnesota Shawn Schottler 174‐G 09a State Parks and State Trails Land Acquisitions MN DNR Jennifer Christie 180‐G 09e Wilder Forest Acquisition Minnesota Food Association Hilary Otey Wold Lincoln Pipestone Rural Water System Acquisition Lincoln Pipestone Rural Water 181‐G 09f for Well Head Protection System Jason Overby Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item: 05 ENRTF ID: 009-A / Subd.
  • Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives

    Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives

    Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives In the Matter of the Application of North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC for a Certificate of Need for the Sandpiper Pipeline Project in Minnesota Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Docket CN-13-473 Minnesota Department of Commerce Energy Environmental Review and Analysis | December 2014 Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives Abstract North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC (NDPC) is proposing to construct the Sandpiper Project, a 565 to 608-mile long pipeline and associated facilities from the Tioga, North Dakota, through Minnesota to Superior, Wisconsin. On November 8, 2013, NDPC filed two applications with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission): the first for a Certificate of Need (CN) and the second for a pipeline route permit for the project. The CN rules at Minn. R. 7853.0130 require, in determining if a certificate of need should be granted, that consideration be paid to the “natural and socioeconomic environments compared to the effects of reasonable alternatives,” and “the effect of the proposed facility, or a suitable modification of it, upon the natural and socioeconomic environments compared to the effect of not building the facility.” For the Sandpiper Project, the Commission concluded that an environmental analysis of six system alternatives, which were identified in the Route Permit docket, and six alternatives to the proposed project identified by NDPC in its CN application would provide it with valuable information to be weighed along with other information while making its need decision. This document is intended to provide that analysis. It is intended for the use of any party who chooses to advocate for or against consideration of an alternative in the certificate of need docket.
  • State of the Trails Final Report February 2017

    State of the Trails Final Report February 2017

    STATE OF THE TRAILS FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2017 ParksCounCil of & Minn TrailsESoTA CONTENTS 3 Key Findings 4 Project Overview STATE OF THE TRAILS 6 Experiental Ratngs 7 Trail Roughness Index 8 DNR Investment Groups 10 Overview of State Trail Pavement Conditons 13 Segment-by-Segment Ratngs 13 Alex Laveau State Trail 29 Harmony Preston State Trail 14 Blazing Star State Trail 31 Heartland State Trail 15 Brown’s Creek State Trail 34 Luce Line State Trail 16 Casey Jones State Trail 36 Mill Towns State Trail 17 Central Lakes State Trail 36 Preston-Forestville State Trail 20 Cuyuna Lakes State Trail 37 Minnesota Valley State Trail 21 Douglas State Trail 38 Paul Bunyan State Trail 22 Gateway State Trail 44 Root River State Trail 23 Gitchi-Gami State Trail 47 Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail 24 Glacial Lakes State Trail 49 Shootng Star State Trail 27 Goodhue Pioneer State Trail 51 Willard Munger State Trail 28 Great River Ridge State Trail RECOMMENDATIONS 54 Consistent State Trail Rehabilitaton 57 Create a State Trail Capital Improvement Plan METHODOLOGY 59 How to Understand Our Ratngs 61 Important Caveats 63 Acknowledgments Vector artwork on cover designed by Freepik 2 www.parksandtrails.org KEY FINDINGS STATE TRAIL CONDITIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS: • Minnesota State Trails are currently in good • Lawmakers and the DNR should commit to conditon. Our inventory found 79% of state rehabilitatng an average of 20 state trail miles trail miles are in either excellent or good per year, which is the level needed to maintain conditon. Minnesota State Trails long term. • Only 26 miles of Minnesota State Trails are • Lawmakers should commit to funding state currently in poor conditon, and 90 miles are in trail rehabilitaton through consistent state fair conditon.
  • Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails District 1 – Northeast Strategic Plan

    Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails District 1 – Northeast Strategic Plan

    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp GREATER MINNESOTA REGIONAL PARKS AND TRAILS DISTRICT 1 – NORTHEAST STRATEGIC PLAN GREATER MINNESOTA REGIONAL PARKS AND TRAILS COMMISSION DISTRICT 2 – NORTHWEST DISTRICT 3 – WEST CENTRAL DISTRICT 4 – EAST CENTRAL DISTRICT 5 – SOUTHWEST DISTRICT 6 – SOUTHEAST Adoption Date: June 25, 2014 IT IS THE INTENT OF THE COMMISSION THAT THIS STRATEGIC PLAN BE A DYNAMIC WORKING DOCUMENT THAT WILL EVOLVE OVER TIME. THIS ADOPTED PLAN SHALL BE USED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 PLANNING PURPOSES. Adoption Date: June 25, 2014 Introduction and Enabling Legislation Under 2013 Minnesota Statutes 85.536, the Minnesota State Legislature created the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (Commission). Under the statute, the Commission “is created to undertake system planning and provide recommendations to the legislature for grants funded by the parks and trails fund to counties and cities outside of the seven-county metropolitan area for parks and trails of regional significance.” The commission includes 13 members appointed by the governor, with two members from each of the six regional parks and trails districts. Through the adoption of this plan, the Commission fulfills it obligation to “develop a strategic plan and criteria for determining parks and trails of regional significance that are eligible for funding from the parks and trails fund and meet the criteria under
  • People Saving Special Places

    People Saving Special Places

    People Saving Special Places Parks & Trails Council of Minnesota Annual Report 2006 Dear Friends innesotans treasure our parks and trails because they give us Maccess to the state’s most outstanding natural, cultural and scenic resources. They are special places where we recreate, interact with nature and enjoy peaceful solitude. Since 1954, the Parks & Trails Council has protected, enhanced and expanded these great outdoor places for generations upon generations of people to enjoy. On the pages of this annual report you will find evidence that the Parks & Trails Council continues to excel in fulfilling our mission. You will also find examples of how we have helped make Minnesota’s park and trail systems the envy of the nation. Clearly, we could not do the important work we do without the generous support of our members and donors, and for that we thank each and every one of you who has made contributions to our wonderful organization. Always determined and forward thinking, the Parks & Trails Council headed into the 2006 legislative session armed with a comprehensive agenda that helped secure nearly $25 million for state park and trail acquisition, development and rehabilitation. The impact of these investments can be felt in nearly every corner of the state. Grant Merritt Our efforts at the Capitol were successful because of the strong bonds we’ve formed with more than 100 grassroots citizen groups around the state. We continued to cultivate these partnerships in 2006 by hosting events such as our biennial conference, our annual Day on the Hill and the first-ever North Shore Parks and Trails Leadership Summit with workshops designed to both energize and educate parks and trails advocates about the important issues of the day.
  • Thursday, March 25, 2004 the Senate Met at 9:00 A.M

    Thursday, March 25, 2004 the Senate Met at 9:00 A.M

    STATE OF MINNESOTA Journal of the Senate EIGHTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE ________________ SEVENTY-NINTH DAY St. Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, March 25, 2004 The Senate met at 9:00 a.m. and was called to order by the President. CALL OF THE SENATE Senator Betzold imposed a call of the Senate. The Sergeant at Arms was instructed to bring in the absent members. Prayer was offered by the Chaplain, Rev. John Estrem. The roll was called, and the following Senators answered to their names: Anderson Frederickson Koering Nienow Sams Bachmann Gaither Kubly Olson Saxhaug Bakk Hann Langseth Ortman Scheid Belanger Higgins LeClair Ourada Senjem Berglin Hottinger Limmer Pappas Skoe Betzold Johnson, D.E. Lourey Pariseau Skoglund Chaudhary Johnson, D.J. Marko Pogemiller Solon Cohen Jungbauer Marty Ranum Sparks Day Kelley McGinn Reiter Stumpf Dibble Kierlin Metzen Rest Tomassoni Dille Kiscaden Michel Robling Vickerman Fischbach Kleis Moua Rosen Wergin Foley Knutson Murphy Ruud Wiger The President declared a quorum present. The reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the Journal, as printed and corrected, was approved. EXECUTIVE AND OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS The following communications were received. March 19, 2004 The Honorable James P. Metzen President of the Senate Dear President Metzen: On behalf of the people of Minnesota, I am honored to inform you that I have received, approved, signed and deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State, S.F. Nos. 2182, 1799 and 1814. Sincerely, Tim Pawlenty, Governor 3000 JOURNAL OF THE SENATE [79TH DAY March 22, 2004 The Honorable Steve Sviggum Speaker of the House of Representatives The Honorable James P.